An introduction to discrete Morse theory

Similar documents
CELLULAR HOMOLOGY AND THE CELLULAR BOUNDARY FORMULA. Contents 1. Introduction 1

Perfect Discrete Morse Functions on Triangulated 3-Manifolds

7.3 Singular Homology Groups

Chapter 3: Homology Groups Topics in Computational Topology: An Algorithmic View

Perfect discrete Morse functions

Algebraic Topology II Notes Week 12

CW-complexes. Stephen A. Mitchell. November 1997

3-manifolds and their groups

Handlebody Decomposition of a Manifold

Solution: We can cut the 2-simplex in two, perform the identification and then stitch it back up. The best way to see this is with the picture:

(iv) Whitney s condition B. Suppose S β S α. If two sequences (a k ) S α and (b k ) S β both converge to the same x S β then lim.

6 Axiomatic Homology Theory

The Classification of (n 1)-connected 2n-manifolds

Rewriting Systems and Discrete Morse Theory

Birth and death in discrete Morse theory

Math 6510 Homework 11

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 25 Jun 2014

Morse homology. Michael Landry. April 2014

Sheaf theory August 23, 2016

Discrete Morse functions on infinite complexes

A Brief History of Morse Homology

Introduction (Lecture 1)

An introduction to cobordism

Topological Simplification in 3-Dimensions

Bjorn Poonen. Cantrell Lecture 3 University of Georgia March 28, 2008

C n.,..., z i 1., z i+1., w i+1,..., wn. =,..., w i 1. : : w i+1. :... : w j 1 1.,..., w j 1. z 0 0} = {[1 : w] w C} S 1 { },

Math Homotopy Theory Hurewicz theorem

A Primer on Homological Algebra

Part II. Algebraic Topology. Year

MONDAY - TALK 4 ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE ON COHOMOLOGY

Simplicial Homology. Simplicial Homology. Sara Kališnik. January 10, Sara Kališnik January 10, / 34

Math 440 Project Assignment

ALGEBRAICALLY TRIVIAL, BUT TOPOLOGICALLY NON-TRIVIAL MAP. Contents 1. Introduction 1

Coxeter Groups and Artin Groups

Persistent Homology. 128 VI Persistence

Manifolds and Poincaré duality

Persistence in discrete Morse theory

A Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds

Algebraic Topology exam

Topological Data Analysis - Spring 2018

A duality on simplicial complexes

Topology Hmwk 6 All problems are from Allen Hatcher Algebraic Topology (online) ch 2

Math 6510 Homework 10

Diffeomorphism Groups of Reducible 3-Manifolds. Allen Hatcher

Homework 4: Mayer-Vietoris Sequence and CW complexes

4 dimensional analogues of Dehn s lemma

MATH 215B HOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS

CONSTRUCTING PIECEWISE LINEAR 2-KNOT COMPLEMENTS

EXCLUDED HOMEOMORPHISM TYPES FOR DUAL COMPLEXES OF SURFACES

MATH 215B HOMEWORK 4 SOLUTIONS

The Cheeger-Müller theorem and generalizations

Morse-Forman-Conley theory for combinatorial multivector fields

Summer School. Novikov Morse Theory for Closed 1-Forms

THE POINCARE-HOPF THEOREM

Classification of (n 1)-connected 2n-dimensional manifolds and the discovery of exotic spheres

2.5 Excision implies Simplicial = Singular homology

An Outline of Homology Theory

Minimal free resolutions that are not supported by a CW-complex.

The A-B slice problem

MATH8808: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY

Exercise: Consider the poset of subsets of {0, 1, 2} ordered under inclusion: Date: July 15, 2015.

Lecture 2. Smooth functions and maps

Metric Thickenings of Euclidean Submanifolds

Math 530 Lecture Notes. Xi Chen

Pseudo-Anosov braids with small entropy and the magic 3-manifold

Algebraic Topology Homework 4 Solutions

121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY. Contents. 6. Poincaré Duality

Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions

Combinatorial Models for M (Lecture 10)

Course notes in algebraic topology

Morse Theory for Lagrange Multipliers

MORSE THEORY DAN BURGHELEA. Department of Mathematics The Ohio State University

Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics

Homotopy types of the complements of hyperplane arrangements, local system homology and iterated integrals

LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM

Equivalence of the Combinatorial Definition (Lecture 11)

ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY IV. Definition 1.1. Let A, B be abelian groups. The set of homomorphisms ϕ: A B is denoted by

Discrete Vector Fields and Fundamental Algebraic Topology.

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 2 Jun 2015

Hodge theory for combinatorial geometries

The Hurewicz Theorem

Optimal Decision Trees on Simplicial Complexes

Simplicial Complexes in Finite Groups. (Cortona. July 2000)

Smith theory. Andrew Putman. Abstract

On the Topology of Simplicial Complexes Related to 3-connected and Hamiltonian Graphs

On the non-existence of elements of Kervaire invariant one

Compact n-manifolds via (n + 1)-colored graphs: a new approach

From singular chains to Alexander Duality. Jesper M. Møller

Topological Data Analysis - II. Afra Zomorodian Department of Computer Science Dartmouth College

We have the following immediate corollary. 1

5. Persistence Diagrams

Ripser. Efficient Computation of Vietoris Rips Persistence Barcodes. Ulrich Bauer TUM

Introduction to surgery theory

Homology Theory, Morse Theory, and the Morse Homology Theorem

Exotic spheres. Overview and lecture-by-lecture summary. Martin Palmer / 22 July 2017

Geometric Topology. Harvard University Fall 2003 Math 99r Course Notes

DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY: MORSE THEORY AND THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC

LECTURE 3: RELATIVE SINGULAR HOMOLOGY

σ = (P 0 < P 1 <... < P k )

Division Algebras and Parallelizable Spheres, Part II

Transcription:

An introduction to discrete Morse theory Henry Adams December 11, 2013 Abstract This talk will be an introduction to discrete Morse theory. Whereas standard Morse theory studies smooth functions on a differentiable manifold, discrete Morse theory considers cell complexes equipped with a discrete function assigning a single value to each cell. Many results in Morse theory have discrete analogues, and I hope to explain these results by example. I will follow A User s Guide to Discrete Morse Theory by Robin Forman [1]. 0.1 Morse Theory Let M be a compact differentiable manifold and f : M R a Morse function (smooth with non-degenerate critical points, i.e. Hessions nonsingular) [2]. m 4 m 3 m 2 m 1 = = = Figure 1: Torus with Morse function given by height. The critical points of index 0, 1, 1, 2 show the torus has a CW decomposition with one 0-cell, two 1-cells, and one 2-cell. 1

Theorem 1. M is homotopy equivalent ( ) to a CW complex with one d-cell for each critical point of index d (number of directions in which f decreases). Proof. (Sketch). For t R let M(t) = f 1 (, t] be its sublevelset. No critical points with value in (s, t] M(t) M(s). Single critical point (index d) with value in (s, t] M(t) M(s) with a single d-cell added. 0.2 Discrete Morse Theory Let K be a simplicial complex (theory also holds for CW complexes). Definition 1. Function f : K R is discrete Morse if for every α (d) K, at most one β (d+1) α satisfies f(β) f(α) at most one γ (d 1) α satisfies f(γ) f(α). Figure 2: Not discrete Morse; discrete Morse. Lemma 1. For each α there are either no such β or no such γ. Proof. (Sketch). Figure 3: d = 1; d = 2. Definition 2. If there are no such β and no such γ, then α is critical. Let f : K R be discrete Morse. Theorem 2. K a CW complex with one d-cell for each critical simplex of dimension d. 2

Proof. (Sketch). For t R let K(t) be its sublevelset subcomplex (include faces of all simplices with f(α) t). No critical simplices with value in (s, t] K(t) K(s) (simplicial collapse). Single critical simplex α (d) with f(α) (s, t] K(t) K(s) with a single d-cell added. Figure 4: K(0) K(1) = K(2) K(3) = K(4) K For σ K, defining f(σ) = dim(σ) gives a trivial Morse function with all simplices critical. Often one wants to find a Morse function with as few critical simplices as possible. 0.3 Gradient Vector Fields Definition 3. A discrete vector field V on K is a collection of pairs α (d) β (d+1) such that each simplex is in at most one pair. Figure 5: A discrete vector field on the projective plane P 2. From a discrete Morse function f : K R we can produce a (negative) gradient vector field. Think of the arrows as simplicial collapses. 3

Figure 6: Gradient vector fields When is a discrete vector field the gradient vector field of some discrete Morse function? Theorem 3. A discrete vector field V is the gradient vector field of a discrete Morse function there are no non-trivial closed V -paths. Definition 4. A V -path is a sequence with α i β i in V and with α i α i+1. α (d) 0 β (d+1) 0 α (d) 1 β (d+1) 1... β r (d+1) α (d) r+1 Figure 7: A V -path Fact. For V the gradient vector field of a discrete Morse function f, we have f(α 0 ) f(β 0 ) > f(α 1 ) f(β 1 ) >... f(β r ) > f(α r+1 ). For our P 2 example, there are no closed V -paths since all V -paths go to the boundary and there are no closed V -paths on the boundary. Hence Which one? P 2 CW complex with one 0-cell, one 1-cell, one 2-cell. 0.4 The Morse Complex K a simplicial complex with Morse function f. Let C d = C d (K, Z) (free abelian group generated by the d-simplices of K), and let M d C d be the span of the critical d-simplices. The chain complex gives ker( d )/ im( d+1 ) =: H d (K; Z).... d+1 C d d Cd 1 4 d 1...

Theorem 4. The chain complex... d+1 Md d Md 1 d 1... gives ker( d )/ im( d+1 ) = H d (K; Z). For β (d+1) critical, β = c α,β α, critical α (d) where c α,β is the sum of signs (±1) of all gradient paths from the boundary of β to α. Figure 8: Sign of a V -path from the boundary of β to α Proof. (Sketch). Since homotopy equivalent spaces have isomorphic homology, Theorem 2 gives all parts of this theorem except for the definition of. Hence Figure 9: A discrete vector field on the projective plane P 2. For our P 2 example, we have M 0 = M 1 = M 2 = Z (e) = (1 1)v 0 = 0 (t) = (1 + 1)e = 2e, giving 0.5 Evasiveness 0 Z 2 Z 0 Z 0. Z = 0 H (P 2 ; Z) = Z/2Z = 1 0 otherwise. Suppose K n = [v 0, v 1,... v n ] is known and σ n is not. 5

Figure 10: K 2 Goal is to determine if σ K by asking Is vertex v i σ? Answers can affect future questions. Win if you ask < n + 1 questions. Figure 11: Evaders are σ = v 2, [v 0, v 2 ]. Definition 5. K is nonevasive if there is a guessing algorithm deciding if σ K in < n + 1 questions for all σ. Else evasive. Theorem 5. The number of evaders in any guessing algorithm 2 dim H (K). Proof. (Sketch). Figure 12: Vector field V = { v 0, v 0 [v 0, v 1 ], v 2 [v 0, v 2 ], [v 1, v 2 ] [v 0, v 1, v 2 ]} on n induced by guessing algorithm. One critical simplex. Fact. V is a gradient vector field. Restrict V to K to get V K = {v 0 [v 0, v 1 ]}. Still no closed orbits. A pair of evaders for each extra critical simplex in V K. # evaders = 2(#critical simplices 1) 2 dim H (K). Theorem 6. If K is nonevasive then K simplicially collapses to a point. Proof. (Sketch). No evaders only one critical 0-simplex. Apply simplicial collapse part of Theorem 2. 6

0.6 Cancelling Critical Points Finding Morse function with fewest critical points is hard. Smooth case: Contains Poincaré conjecture (smooth manifold M d S d M = S d ) since spheres are those spaces with 2 critical points. Milnor presented Smale s proof for dim 5 using Morse theory. Roughly, let M S d. Pick smooth Morse function f. Cancel critical points in pairs until only two remain, implying M = S d. Theorem 7. Suppose f is a discrete Morse function on K with α (d), β (d+1) critical and exactly one gradient path from β to α. Then reversing the direction of this gradient path produces a discrete Morse function with α, β no longer critical. Figure 13: Cancelling critical points. Proof. Unique gradient path resulting gradient field has no closed orbits, hence corresponds to Morse function. Note α, β no longer critical while other simplices are unchanged. In smooth analogue, one must also smoothly adjust vectors near the gradient path (without creating closed orbits). 0.7 Homeomorphism type Definition 6. K is a combinatorial d-ball [resp. (d 1)-sphere] if K and d [resp. d ] have isomorphic subdivisions. Theorem 8. A combinatorial d-manifold (link of every vertex is a combinatorial (d 1) sphere or ball) with a discrete Morse function with two critical simplices is a combinatorial d-sphere. 0.8 Conclusion References [1] Robin Forman. A user s guide to discrete Morse theory. Sém. Lothar. Combin, 48:B48c, 2002. 7

[2] J. Milnor. Morse Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1965. 8