Fermionic structure of form factors. Fedor Smirnov.. p.1/21

Similar documents
Conformal field theory on the lattice: from discrete complex analysis to Virasoro algebra

Finite temperature form factors in the free Majorana theory

A new perspective on long range SU(N) spin models

Baker-Akhiezer functions and configurations of hyperplanes

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 20 Oct 1993

Quantum Gravity in 2+1 Dimensions I

4 Uniform convergence

Single particle Green s functions and interacting topological insulators

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 2 Jul 1998

Generalized string equations for Hurwitz numbers

Integrability of Conformal Fishnet Theory

Conformal blocks in nonrational CFTs with c 1

1 Unitary representations of the Virasoro algebra

A FEW ELEMENTARY FACTS ABOUT ELLIPTIC CURVES

Inverse scattering technique in gravity

1 Quantum field theory and Green s function

A class of trees and its Wiener index.

Virasoro and Kac-Moody Algebra

Abelian and non-abelian Hopfions in all odd dimensions

Roots of Unity, Cyclotomic Polynomials and Applications

Partitions into Values of a Polynomial

Construction of latin squares of prime order

Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras. and affine Kac Moody algebras

MAGNETIC BLOCH FUNCTIONS AND VECTOR BUNDLES. TYPICAL DISPERSION LAWS AND THEIR QUANTUM NUMBERS

Truncations of Haar distributed matrices and bivariate Brownian bridge

Citation for published version (APA): Halbersma, R. S. (2002). Geometry of strings and branes. Groningen: s.n.

1 Canonical quantization conformal gauge

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 15 Jul 2005

Classical Lie algebras and Yangians

MA 412 Complex Analysis Final Exam

Zeta Functions and Regularized Determinants for Elliptic Operators. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

Towards the construction of local Logarithmic Conformal Field Theories

Quantum field theory and Green s function

Integrable structure of various melting crystal models

Each is equal to CP 1 minus one point, which is the origin of the other: (C =) U 1 = CP 1 the line λ (1, 0) U 0

Entanglement entropy in a holographic model of the Kondo effect

Fusion Rules and the Verlinde Formula

6.1 Polynomial Functions

D-modules Representations of Finite Superconformal Algebras and Constraints on / 1 Su. Superconformal Mechanics

Holomorphic Bootstrap for Rational CFT in 2D

Explicit realization of affine vertex algebras and their applications

Spectral Functions for Regular Sturm-Liouville Problems

Applications of AdS/CFT correspondence to cold atom physics

A complete criterion for convex-gaussian states detection

Tutorial on Differential Galois Theory III

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

5. Atoms and the periodic table of chemical elements. Definition of the geometrical structure of a molecule

Letting be a field, e.g., of the real numbers, the complex numbers, the rational numbers, the rational functions W(s) of a complex variable s, etc.

HIGHER SPIN CORRECTIONS TO ENTANGLEMENT ENTROPY

La mesure de Mahler supérieure et la question de Lehmer

Indecomposability parameters in LCFT

(x 1, y 1 ) = (x 2, y 2 ) if and only if x 1 = x 2 and y 1 = y 2.

20. The pole diagram and the Laplace transform

Breakdown and restoration of integrability in the Lieb-Liniger model

NONINTEGER FLUXES, DOLBEAULT COMPLEXES, AND SUPERSYMMETRIC QUANTUM MECHANICS. based on [ ] and [ ] Hannover, August 1, 2011

THE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS

Quantum Grand Canonical Ensemble

Fractional Quantum Hall States with Conformal Field Theories

Proof by Contradiction

Einstein-Hilbert action on Connes-Landi noncommutative manifolds

2D CFT and the Ising Model

RIEMANN SURFACES. max(0, deg x f)x.

2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics

PHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix

8.334: Statistical Mechanics II Problem Set # 4 Due: 4/9/14 Transfer Matrices & Position space renormalization

Planar QED in Magnetic or Electric Solitonic Backgrounds

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Complex Homework Summer 2014

SSH Model. Alessandro David. November 3, 2016

Strictly Positive Definite Functions on the Circle

Finite Temperature Field Theory


Proof of a conjecture by Ðoković on the Poincaré series of the invariants of a binary form

2.1 Calculation of the ground state energy via path integral

On Flux Quantization in F-Theory

LECTURE 3: Quantization and QFT

Math 213br HW 1 solutions

1 Introduction. or equivalently f(z) =

Topological Phases in One Dimension

Variations on a Theme: Fields of Definition, Fields of Moduli, Automorphisms, and Twists

Very quick introduction to the conformal group and cft

Computation of the Dimensions of Symmetry Classes of Tensors Associated with the Finite two Dimensional Projective Special Linear Group

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 15 May 1996

On the Theory of Metals.

Notes on Equidistribution

Week 11 Reading material from the books

Entanglement in Topological Phases

MATH 452. SAMPLE 3 SOLUTIONS May 3, (10 pts) Let f(x + iy) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) be an analytic function. Show that u(x, y) is harmonic.

Ambitwistor Strings beyond Tree-level Worldsheet Models of QFTs

b c a Permutations of Group elements are the basis of the regular representation of any Group. E C C C C E C E C E C C C E C C C E

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory More about the Gamma function

Oberwolfach Preprints

Some New Properties of Wishart Distribution

1.7 Plane-wave Solutions of the Dirac Equation

Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime

Future Self-Guides. E,.?, :0-..-.,0 Q., 5...q ',D5', 4,] 1-}., d-'.4.., _. ZoltAn Dbrnyei Introduction. u u rt 5,4) ,-,4, a. a aci,, u 4.

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Symmetric Jack polynomials and fractional level WZW models

Microstates of AdS black holes and supersymmetric localization

Transcription:

Fermionic structure of form factors Fedor Smirnov p1/21

Preliminaries We consider sg model A sg = {[ 1 16π ( µϕ(x)) 2 + µ2 sinπβ 2e iβϕ(x)] + µ2 sinπβ 2eiβϕ(x)} d 2 x We shall use the parameter = 1 β 2, We are interested in local fields which do not change the topological charge, namely in the primary fields Φ α (z, z) = e iα 2 1 ϕ(z, z), and their descendants For irrational α, β the correspondence with CFT fields is fixed by dimensional considerations We shall consider only the fundamental particles: solitons and antisolitons p2/21

S-matrix Let β j be rapidities We shall use The two soliton S-matrix is given by and B j = e β j, b j = e 2 1 β j, q = e πi 1 1 S i,j (β i β j ) = S 0 (β i β j ) S i,j (b i /b j ), sin(2kβ) sinh((2 1)πk) S 0 (β) = exp i kcosh(πk)sinh(π(1 )k) dk, 0 S i,j (b i /b j ) = 1 2 (I i I j +σ 3 i σ 3 j)+ b i b j b i q 1 b j q 1 2 (I i I j σ 3 i σ 3 j) + b i b j q 1 q b i q 1 b j q (σ+ i σ j +σ i σ + j ) p3/21

Form factor axioms Symmetry axiom S j,j+1 (β j β j+1 )f Oα (β 1,,β j,β j+1,,β 2n ) = f Oα (β 1,,β j+1,β j,,β 2n ) Riemann-Hilbert problem axiom f Oα (β 1,,β 2n 1,β 2n +2πi) = e πi 1 ασ3 2n foα (β 2n,β 1,,,β 2n 1 ) Residue axiom 2πi res β2n =β 2n 1 +πif Oα (β 1,,β 2n 2,β 2n 1,β 2n ) = ( ) 1 e πi 1 ασ3 2n S2n 1,1 (β 2n 1 β 1 ) S 2n 1,2n 2 (β 2n 1 β 2n 2 ) f Oα (β 1,,β 2n 2 ) (e + 2n 1 e 2n +e 2n 1 e+ 2n ) p4/21

Important observation: The form factor equations for all the fields with α+2m 1 coincide The structure of the form factor: f Oα (β 1,,β 2n ) = w ǫ 1,,ǫ 2n (β 1,,β 2n ) F Oα,n(β I β I+ ), ǫ 1,,ǫ 2n =± where I ± = {j 1 j 2n, ǫ j = ±}, and the sum over ǫ j s is such that (I + ) = (I ), β I = {β i1,,β in } The basis satisfies S i,i+1 (β i β i+1 )w ǫ 1,,ǫ i,ǫ i+1,,ǫ 2n (β 1,,β i,β i+1,,β 2n ) =w ǫ 1,,ǫ i+1,ǫ i,,ǫ 2n (β 1,,β i+1,β i,,β 2n ) p5/21

Integrals We introduce integration variable σ We use the notations S = e σ, B j = e β j, Q = e πi1, A = e πiα s = e 2 1 σ, b j = e 2 1 β j, q = e πi 1 1, a = e πi 1 α Introduce the function χ(σ β 1,,β 2n ) which satisfies where χ(σ +2πi)p(sq 4 ) = χ(σ)p(sq 2 ) χ(σ + 1 πi)p(sq) = χ(σ)p( S), P(S) = 2n (S B j ), p(s) = 2n (s b j ) For β j R no singularities in the strip 0 > Im(σ) > π p6/21

Asymptotic behaviour for σ ± : χ(σ β 1,,β 2n ) σ e 2n 1 1 σ, χ(σ β 1,,β 2n ) σ = 1 Our main tool is the integral I α (β 1,,β 2n ) = R i0 χ(σ β 1,,β 2n )e α 1 σ dσ This integral converges for 0 < Re(α) < 2n, and can be continued analytically with respect to α The result is a meromorphic function in C with simple poles at α = 2(n+m)+(2n+l) 1, l,m 0; α = 2m 1 l, l,m 0 p7/21

Definition Consider two Laurent polynomials l(s) and L(S) We define their pairing(l,l) α by the following two requirements: 1 The pairing is bilinear 2 If l(s) = s m,l(s) = S l then q-exact forms and Q-exact forms (l,l) α = I α+2m+ 1 l For D a [z](s) = a 2 p(s)z(s) p(sq 2 )z(sq 4 ), (D a [z],l) α = 0, L For D A [Z](S) = Z(S)P(S) AZ(SQ)P( S), (l,d A [Z]) α = 0, l p8/21

For antisymmetric Laurent polynomials of k variables: l (k) (s 1, s k ) = ( l 1 l k ) (s1, s k ), define L (k) (S 1,,S k ) = ( L 1 L k )(S 1,,S k ) (l (k),l (k) ) α = det((l i,l j ) α ) i,,,k Form factors and BBS fermions We need F(β I,β I +) Introduce c I I +(t,s) = p I +(q 2 t)p I (s) ( a 1 q 2 ) t q 2 t s a 1 t t s +p I (t)p I +(q 2 s) + at t q 2 s p(q2 s) a 1 q 2 n 1 t q 2 t s p(s) := (q 2 t) n i l I I +,i(s), i=0 and ( a 1 t t s at ) t q 2 s l (n) I I + (s 1,,s n ) = ( l I I +,0 l I I +,n 1) (s1,,s n ) p9/21

Then the Riemann-Hilbert axiom is satisfied if F Oα,n(β I β I +) = (l (n) I I +, L (n) ) α, where L (n) = L (n) (S 1,,S n B 1,,B 2n ) is an arbitrary Laurent polynomial which is anti-symmetric in S i s and symmetric in B j s Definition of tower Polynomials constitute a tower if L ( ) = {L (n) (S 1,,S n B 1,,B 2n )} L (n) (S 1,,S n 1,B B 1,,B 2n 2,B, B) = ( 1) c B (B 2 Sp) L 2 (n 1) (S 1,,S n 1 B 1,,B 2n 2 ) n 1 p=1 p10/21

Every tower of charge 0 defines a local operator Descendants of the local integrals are obtained multiplying by i 2k 1 = C k M 2k 1 B 2k 1 j, ī 2k 1 = C k M 2k 1 B (2k 1) j The primary field Φ α corresponds to the tower M (n) 0 (S 1,,S n ) = Φ α S S 3 S 2n 1 It is possible to pass to odd degrees only introducing the polynomials C ±,n (S 1,S 2 ) = 1 2 ǫ 1,ǫ 2 =± ǫ 1 ǫ 2 P n (ǫ 1 S 1 )P n (ǫ 2 S 2 )τ ± (ǫ 2 S 2 /ǫ 1 S 1 ), where τ + (x) = l=0 ( x) l i 2 cot π 2 (α+ l ), τ (x) = 1 l= ( x) l i 2 cot π 2 (α+ l ) p11/21

Then the towers are created by action of four fermions ψ (Z) = ψ (Z) = Z 2j+1 ψ2j 1, χ (X) = X 2j+1 χ 2j 1, Z 2j 1 ψ 2j 1, χ (X) = X 2j 1 χ 2j 1 ( ψ (Z 1 ) ψ (Z p ) ψ (Z p+1 ) ψ (Z k ) χ (X k ) χ (X q+1 )χ (X q ) χ (X 1 )M (n) ) 0 (S1,,S n ) = Φ α ( ) 1 kk k k A B C D Pn (Z j )P n ( Z j ) Pn (X j )P n ( X j ), where A, B, C, D are respectively k k, k n, n k, n n matrices p12/21

C + (Z 1,S 1 ) C + (Z 1,S n ) B = C + (Z p,s 1 ) C + (Z p,s n ) C (Z p+1,s 1 ) C (Z p+1,s n ) C (Z k,s 1 ) C (Z k,s n ), C = X 1 X k X1 2n 1 X 2n 1 k, D = S 1 S n S1 2n 1 Sn 2n 1 χ (X k ), χ (X k ) create holes, ψ (Z k ), ψ (Z k ) crate particles p13/21

The matrix A is needed in order to avoid interference between two chiralities A = 0 0 C + (Z 1,X q+1 ) C + (Z 1,X k ) 0 0 C + (Z p,x q+1 ) C + (Z p,x k ) C (Z p+1,x 1 ) C (Z p+1,x q ) 0 0 C (Z k,x 1 ) C (Z k,x q ) 0 0 Take large n The fermions χ and ψ are doing something at the right end of Fermi zone, while χ and ψ are doing something at the left end There is an important integer (weight) m = 1 2 (#(ψ ) #(χ )+#( χ ) #( ψ )) For given weight m we describe descendants of Φ α+2m 1 p14/21

In particular, ψ1 ψ2m 1 χ 2m 1 χ 1 M ( ) 0 Φ α m = Φ α+2m 1 ( i )m cot π 2 ψ 1 ψ 2m 1χ 2m 1 χ 1 M ( ) 0 Φ α m = Later we shall use Φ α 2m 1 ( i )m cot π 2 (α +(2j 1)) M( ) m, (α (2j 1)) M( ) m ψ(z) = χ(z) = Z 2j 1 ψ 2j 1, ψ(z) = Z 2j+1 ψ2j 1, Z 2j 1 χ 2j 1, χ(z) = Z 2j+1 χ 2j 1, p15/21

Null-vectors Something special happens when α = m 1 which means e α 1 = S m Consider the antisymmetric polynomial c(s 1,s 2 ) = p(s 1 ) Suppose s 2 q 2 s 1 q 2 s 2 p(q 2 s 1 ) s 2 s 1 q 2 p(s s 1 q 2 2 ) +p(q 2 s s 2 s 2 q 2 2 ) s 1 s 1 s 2 q 2 s 1 c(s 1,s 2 ) = n 1 (r i (s 2 )s i (s 1 ) r i (s 1 )s i (s 2 )) Pairing: r i r j = s i s j = 0, r i s j = δ i,j p16/21

Quantum Riemann bilinear identity It can be checked that (m 1 m 2,C ± ) 0 = 2πi(m 1 m 2 ) l I I +,i l I I +,j = 0, which implies vanishing of certain local operators In particular, if we define C even = ψ dd (D)χ(D) 2πiD 3, then for α = 1 C even ψ I + χ I M ( ) 0 0, #(I + ) = #(I ) 2 Simplest case: ψ 1χ 2m 1Φ (2m 1) 1 = 0 p17/21

Integrable structure of CFT We claim that the space m= V α+2m 1 V α+2m 1, is created by action on Φ α (0) of i 2j 1, ī2j 1 and fermionic creation operators: β 2j 1, γ 2j 1, β 2j 1, γ 2j 1 What do we know about descendants of these fermions to Virasoro descendants? For technical reasons exact formulae are known only on the quotient space by i 2j 1, ī2j 1 which can be realized as created by l 2k p18/21

Introduce the notations I + = {2i + 1 1,,2i+ p 1}, β I + = β 2i + 1 1 β 2i + p 1, etc Then if #(I + ) = #(I ), β I +γ I Φ α (0) = 2j 1 I + D 2j 1 (α) 2j 1 I D 2j 1 (2 α) [ P even I +,I ({l 2k } α,c)+d α P odd I +,I ({l 2k } α,c) ] Φ α (0), where i 2j 1 D 2j 1 (α) = Γ() (1 ) 2j 1 2 d α = 1 6 (25 c)(24 α +1 c) Γ ( α 2 + 1 2 (2j 1)) (j 1)!Γ ( α 2 + 1 2 (2j 1)), Similarly for other chirality changing α 2 α p19/21

Our main theorem Consider β (ζ) = β 2j 1(ζ µ) 2j 1 + β 2j 1(ζ/µ) 2j 1 etc Then β (ζ 1 ) β (ζ m )γ (ξ m ) γ (ξ 1 )Φ α (0) sg R Φ α (0) sg R = detω sg R (ζ i,ξ j α), and the function ωr sg (ζ,ξ α) can be described through the TBA data This allows to compare with previously introduced fermions and to conclude that β 2k 1 = ψ 2k 1,γ 2k 1 = χ 2k 1, β 2k 1 = ψ 2k 1, γ 2k 1 = χ 2k 1 p20/21

Back to null vectors In the simplest case we have the singular vectors: β 1γ 2m 1Φ 1,2m = 0 What can be checked with data at hand? For φ 1,2 not a lot β 1γ 1Φ 1,2 l 2 Φ 1,2 (mod left action of i 2j 1,ī2j 1) Actual null-vector is contains l 2 1, but l 1 = i 1 For m = 2 we have β 1γ 3Φ 1,4 = 0 On the other hand we have ( 2c 32 β 1γ 3Φ α l 2 2 + 9 2 ) +d α l 4 (mod left action of i 2j 1,ī2j 1) 3 For α = 3 1 this coincides with the CFT null-vector factorised by the left action of th integrals of motion! p21/21