News in jet algorithms:

Similar documents
Defining jets at the dawn of the LHC

Jets: where from, where to?

Joint ICTP-INFN-SISSA Conference: Topical Issues in LHC Physics. 29 June - 2 July, Jet Physics at the LHC

Jets in QCD, an introduction

Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC

Standard Model Handles and Candles WG (session 1)

Towards Jetography. Gavin Salam. LPTHE, CNRS and UPMC (Univ. Paris 6)

Jets at LHCb. Gavin Salam. LHCb, CERN, 21 January CERN, Princeton & LPTHE/CNRS (Paris)

Jet reconstruction in heavy-ion collisions

Jets (and photons) at the LHC. J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010

Vivian s Meeting April 17 th Jet Algorithms. Philipp Schieferdecker (KIT)

Theoretical aspects of jet-finding

Towards Jetography. Gavin P. Salam. LPTHE, UPMC Univ. Paris 6, CNRS UMR 7589, Paris 05, France. Abstract

A practical Seedless Infrared-Safe Cone jet algorithm

Jets, and Reconstruction with FastJet

Jet-finding for LHC. Gavin Salam work with M. Cacciari and (in progress) G. Soyez. LPTHE, Universities of Paris VI and VII and CNRS

Jets and jet definitions

Review of jet reconstruction algorithms

Jet reconstruction with FastJet

Jet Reconstruction Algorithms in Deep Inelastic Scattering

Recent QCD results from ATLAS

July 8, 2015, Pittsburgh. Jets. Zoltan Nagy DESY

Lecture 5. QCD at the LHC Joey Huston Michigan State University

Nikos Varelas. University of Illinois at Chicago. CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 20, Nikos Varelas. CTEQ Meeting Nov 20, 2009

Non-perturbative effects for QCD jets at hadron colliders

QCD Jet Physics with CMS LHC

LHC Heavy Ion Physics Lecture 5: Jets, W, Z, photons

QCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking. Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve

QCD at CDF. Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration

QCD at hadron colliders Lecture 2: Showers, Jets and fixed-order predictions

Jet reconstruction. What are jets? How can we relate the measured jets to the underlying physics process? Calibration of jets Tagging of jets

Jet reconstruction with first data in ATLAS

Introduction to Jets. Hsiang nan Li ( 李湘楠 ) Academia Sinica, Taipei. July. 11, 2014

Experiences on QCD Monte Carlo simulations: a user point of view on the inclusive jet cross-section simulations

The inclusive jet cross section, jet algorithms, underlying event and fragmentation corrections. J. Huston Michigan State University

Diphoton production at LHC

Implementing Jet Algorithms: A Practical Jet Primer

Jet Physics. Yazid Delenda. 1st Jijel Meeting on Theoretical Physics. Jijel, October 29-31, University Batna 1

Factorization for Jet Substructure. Andrew Larkoski Reed College

Zhong-Bo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory

Power corrections to jet distributions at hadron colliders

Don Lincoln. QCD Results from the Tevatron

QCD Jets at the LHC. Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago. on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations

Jet Substructure. Adam Davison. University College London

Measurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC. Michele Cascella

Measurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the ATLAS detector

Jets, underlying event and HIC

Jets, UE and early LHC data

Hadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18

Physics at LHC. lecture one. Sven-Olaf Moch. DESY, Zeuthen. in collaboration with Martin zur Nedden

Comparing different Jet-Algorithms for photoproduction Monte Carlo data

Results on QCD jet production at the LHC (incl. Heavy flavours)

Exploring Jet Properties in p+p Collisions at 200 GeV with STAR

On QCD jet mass distributions at LHC

Double- & multi-parton scatterings in p-a collisions at the LHC

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 2 Nov 2017

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 21 Aug 2011

Top production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC

Azimuthal decorrelations between jets in QCD

Precision QCD at the Tevatron. Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations

Jets Lecture 1: jet algorithms Lecture 2: jet substructure

Future Perspectives in HEP Jet Physics and Precision Tests of QCD

QCD Phenomenology at High Energy

Pino and Power Corrections: from LEP to LHC

Moriond QCD. Latest Jets Results from the LHC. Klaus Rabbertz, KIT. Proton Structure (PDF) Proton Structure (PDF) Klaus Rabbertz

QCD dijet analyses at DØ

Lecture 2. QCD at the LHC Joey Huston Michigan State University

Miguel Villaplana Università degli Studi e INFN Milano. on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration. September 11, 2017

Relativistic Heavy Ions III - Hard Probes and Jet Quenching

Double & multi parton scatterings in p-a collisions at the LHC

Event shapes in hadronic collisions

QCD at hadron colliders

W/Z production with 2b at NLO

Phenomenology of hadronic collisions

Hard And Soft QCD Physics In ATLAS

Jet structures in New Physics and Higgs searches

Studies on hadronic top decays

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 18 Jan 2016

QCD and Top physics studies in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV centre-of-mass energy with the ATLAS detector

High p T physics at the LHC Lecture III Standard Model Physics

Measurements of jet rates with the anti-k T and SISCone algorithms at LEP with the OPAL detector

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 1 Oct 2006

Colin Jessop. University of Notre Dame

Recent Results on Jet Physics and α s

from Klaus Rabbertz, KIT Proton Structure (PDF) Proton Structure (PDF) Klaus Rabbertz Status of αs Determinations Mainz, Germany,

4/ Examples of PDF Uncertainty. May 2005 CTEQ Summer School 25

Recent Advances in QCD Event Generators

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 14 Oct 2013

Transverse Energy-Energy Correlation on Hadron Collider. Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron

JET FRAGMENTATION DENNIS WEISER

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)309. Electroweak Physics at LHCb

Atlas results on diffraction

QCD, top and LHC Lecture II: QCD, asymptotic freedom and infrared safety

Gavin Salam. CERN, Princeton & LPTHE/CNRS (Paris) Work performed with Mathieu Rubin and Sebastian Sapeta, arxiv:

Inclusive spectrum of charged jets in central Au+Au collisions at s NN = 200 GeV by STAR

QCD Studies at the Tevatron

Introduction to Perturbative QCD

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 24 Oct 2017

IRC Safety vs. Calculability

K-factors and jet algorithms. J. Huston

Transcription:

News in jet algorithms: SISCone and anti-k t Grégory Soyez Brookhaven National Laboratory G.P. Salam, G. Soyez, JHEP 5 (7) 86 [arxiv:74.292] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam, G. Soyez, JHEP 4 (8) 63 [arxiv:82.1189] Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 1/15

Jet definitions Aim: Study hard processes QCD backgrounds, top quark physics Higgs, physics beyond the standard model Define jets: parton jet But: partons are ambiguous Hence: Multiple definitions of a jet? Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 2/15

Two classes of algorithms Class 1: recombination Cass 2: cone Successive recombinations of the find directions of energy flow closest (a) pair of particle stable cones (b) Nice perturbative behaviour Small sensitivity to soft radiation (UE,PU) Often used in e ± e ±, e ± p Often used in pp (a) Distance: k t : d i,j = min(kt,i 2, k2 t,j )( φ2 i,j + y2 i,j ) Aachen/Cam.: d i,j = φ 2 i,j + y2 i,j (b) stable cones (radius R) such that: the total momentum of its contents points in the direction of its centre Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 3/15

How the cone works... Seeded (iterative) approaches: iterate from an initial position until stable seed = initial particle seed = midpoint between stable cones found at first step One has to deal with overlapping stable cones: 2 subclasses Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 4/15

How the cone works... Seeded (iterative) approaches: iterate from an initial position until stable seed = initial particle seed = midpoint between stable cones found at first step Class 2(a): cone with split-merge (ex.: JetClu, Atlas, MidPoint): p t,shared > f p t,min p t,shared f p t,min Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 4/15

How the cone works... Seeded (iterative) approaches: iterate from an initial position until stable seed = initial particle seed = midpoint between stable cones found at first step Class 2(a): cone with split-merge (ex.: JetClu, Atlas, MidPoint): p t,shared > f p t,min p t,shared f p t,min Class 2(b): cone with progressive removal (ex.: Iterative Cone) iterate from the hardest seed remove the stable cone as a jet and start again Idea: regular/circular jets Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 4/15

SNOWMASS accords SNOWMASS, Tevatron 199 (i.e. old!): i.e. usable by theoreticians (e.g. finite perturbative results) and experimentalists (e.g. fast enough) This talk: Seeded cone algorithms miss stable cones theoretical problems That can be solved keeping experimental usefulness Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 5/15

QCD divergences QCD probability for gluon bremsstrahlung at angle θ and -mom. k t : Two divergences: θ dp α s dθ θ dk t k t p t Collinear Soft k t p t Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 6/15

QCD divergences QCD probability for gluon bremsstrahlung at angle θ and -mom. k t : Two divergences: θ dp α s dθ θ dk t k t p t Collinear Soft k t p t For pqcd to make sense, the (hard) jets (or stable cones) should not change when one has a collinear splitting i.e. replaces one parton by two at the same place (η, φ) one has a soft emission i.e. adds a very soft gluon Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 6/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ -1 1 2 3 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ -1 1 2 3 Stable cones: Midpoint: {1,2} & {3} {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} Seedless: {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} φ Jets: (f =.5) Midpoint: {1,2} & {3} {1,2,3} Seedless: {1,2,3} {1,2,3} Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ -1 1 2 3 Stable cones: Midpoint: {1,2} & {3} {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} Seedless: {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} φ Jets: (f =.5) Midpoint: {1,2} & {3} {1,2,3} Seedless: {1,2,3} {1,2,3} Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ -1 1 2 3 Stable cones: Midpoint: {1,2} & {3} {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} Seedless: {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} φ Jets: (f =.5) Midpoint: {1,2} & {3} {1,2,3} Seedless: {1,2,3} {1,2,3} Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

IR unsafety of the Midpoint alg -1 1 2 3 φ -1 1 2 3 Stable cones: Midpoint: {1,2} & {3} {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} Seedless: {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} {1,2} & {3} & {2,3} φ Jets: (f =.5) Midpoint: {1,2} & {3} {1,2,3} Seedless: {1,2,3} {1,2,3} Stable cone missed IR unsafety of the midpoint algorithm Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 7/15

Solution: SISCone Solution: use a seedless approach, find ALL stable cones Naive approach: check stability of each subset of particle Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 8/15

Solution: SISCone Solution: use a seedless approach, find ALL stable cones Naive approach: check stability of each subset of particle Complexity is O ( N2 N) definitely unrealistic: 1 17 years for N = Midpoint complexity: O ( N 3) Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 8/15

Solution: SISCone Solution: use a seedless approach, find ALL stable cones Midpoint complexity: O ( N 3) Idea: use geometric arguments Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 8/15

Solution: SISCone Solution: use a seedless approach, find ALL stable cones Midpoint complexity: O ( N 3) Idea: use geometric arguments (a) (b) (c) Each enclosure can be moved (in any direction) until it touches a point... then rotated until it touches a second one Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 8/15

Solution: SISCone Solution: use a seedless approach, find ALL stable cones Midpoint complexity: O ( N 3) Idea: use geometric arguments Enumerate all pairs of particles with 2 circle orientations and 4 possible inclusion/exclusion find all enclosures Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 8/15

Solution: SISCone Solution: use a seedless approach, find ALL stable cones Midpoint complexity: O ( N 3) Idea: use geometric arguments Enumerate all pairs of particles with 2 circle orientations and 4 possible inclusion/exclusion find all enclosures Complexity: O ( N 3), with improvements: O ( N 2 log(n) ) Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 8/15

Solution: SISCone Solution: use a seedless approach, find ALL stable cones Midpoint complexity: O ( N 3) Idea: use geometric arguments Enumerate all pairs of particles with 2 circle orientations and 4 possible inclusion/exclusion find all enclosures Complexity: O ( N 3), with improvements: O ( N 2 log(n) ) C++ implementation: Seedless Infrared-Safe Cone algorithm (SISCone) G.Salam, G.S., JHEP 4 (7) 86; http://projects.hepforge.org/siscone NB.: also available from FastJet [M.Cacciari, G.Salam, G.S.]; http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ salam/fastjet Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 8/15

Physical impact Execution timings: 1 CDF midpoint (s= GeV) CDF midpoint (s=1 GeV) PxCone SISCone Random hard & soft partons fraction with hard hard+soft 1 JetClu 5.1% run time (s).1 MidPoint 16.4% PxCone 9.3%.1 < 1-9 Seedless [SM-p t ] SISCone 1.6%.1 N at least as fast as midpoint cones 1-5 1-4 1-3 1-2 1-1 1 Fraction of hard events failing IR safety test IR safe JetClu,ATLAS cone: 5% failure MidPoint: 15% failure Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 9/15

Physical impact (2) Inclusive (midpoint/siscone-1) Masses in 3-jet events pp s = 14 TeV dσ midpoint(1) /dp t / dσ SISCone /dp t 1.15.1.5. (b) Pythia 6.4 hadron-level (with UE) hadron-level (no UE) parton-level R=.7, f=.5, y <.7 rel. diff. for dσ/dm 2.5.4.3.2.1 NLOJet R=.7, f=.5 R 23 < 1.4 Mass spectrum of jet 2 midpoint() -- SISCone SISCone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 M (GeV) 5 15 p t [GeV] Inclusive cross-section: Effect of a few percents Less sensiticity to the UE More exclusive processes: effects 45% (Important for LHC!) Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 1/15

Coll. unsafety of the iterative cone -1 1 2 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 11/15

Coll. unsafety of the iterative cone -1 1 2 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 11/15

Coll. unsafety of the iterative cone -1 1 2 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 11/15

Coll. unsafety of the iterative cone -1 1 2 φ -1 1 2 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 11/15

Coll. unsafety of the iterative cone -1 1 2 φ -1 1 2 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 11/15

Coll. unsafety of the iterative cone -1 1 2 φ -1 1 2 φ Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 11/15

Coll. unsafety of the iterative cone -1 1 2 φ -1 1 2 φ Before collinear spliting: 1 jet After collinear spliting: 2 jets collinear unsafety of the iterative cone algorithm Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 11/15

Anti-k t Come back to recombination-type algorithms: d ij = min(k 2p t,i, k2p t,j ) ( ) φ 2 ij + ηij 2 p = 1: k t algorithm p = : Aachen/Cambridge algorithm Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 12/15

Anti-k t Come back to recombination-type algorithms: d ij = min(k 2p t,i, k2p t,j ) ( ) φ 2 ij + ηij 2 p = 1: k t algorithm p = : Aachen/Cambridge algorithm p = 1: anti-k t algorithm [M.Cacciari, G.Salam, G.S.,JHEP 4 (8) 63] Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 12/15

Anti-k t Come back to recombination-type algorithms: d ij = min(k 2p t,i, k2p t,j ) ( ) φ 2 ij + ηij 2 p = 1: k t algorithm p = : Aachen/Cambridge algorithm p = 1: anti-k t algorithm [M.Cacciari, G.Salam, G.S.,JHEP 4 (8) 63] Why should that be related to the iterative cone?!? large k t small distance i.e. hard partons eat everything up to a distance R i.e. circular/regular jets, jet borders unmodified by soft radiation infrared and collinear safe Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 12/15

anti-k t Hard event + homogeneous soft background anti-k t is soft-resilient more in Matteo Cacciari s talk... Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 13/15

anti-k t Execution timings: run time (s) 1 1.1.1 CDF midpoint (s= GeV) CDF midpoint (s=1 GeV) PxCone SISCone anti-k t (fastjet).1 N Distribution of hard jets area (π R 2 )/N dn/da 1 8 6 4 2 Pythia 6.4 p t,min =1 TeV 2 hardest jets y <2, R=1 SISCone Cambridge k t anti-k t (/1).5 1 1.5 2 2.5 area/(πr 2 ) hadron-level + pileup active area As fast as the (fast) k t ([M. Cacciari, G. Salam, 6]) Regular hard jets of area πr 2 Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 14/15

Conclusions Midpoint and the iterative cone IR or Collinear unsafe (at O(α 4 s)) Observable 1st miss cones at Last meaningful order Inclusive jet cross section NNLO NLO 3 jet cross section NLO LO (NLO in NLOJet) W/Z/H + 2 jet cross sect. NLO LO (NLO in MCFM) jet masses in 3 jets LO none (LO in NLOJet) The IR-unsafety issue will matter at LHC + We do not want the theoretical efforts to be wasted Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 15/15

Conclusions Midpoint and the iterative cone IR or Collinear unsafe (at O(α 4 s)) Observable 1st miss cones at Last meaningful order Inclusive jet cross section NNLO NLO 3 jet cross section NLO LO (NLO in NLOJet) W/Z/H + 2 jet cross sect. NLO LO (NLO in MCFM) jet masses in 3 jets LO none (LO in NLOJet) The IR-unsafety issue will matter at LHC + We do not want the theoretical efforts to be wasted JetClu ATLAS Cone MidPoint Iterative Cone SISCone Anti-k t as fast IRC safe regular IRC safe Both available from FastJet (http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ salam/fastjet) Grégory Soyez HERA-LHC 8, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, May 26-3 8 SISCone and the anti-k t p. 15/15