Intercollegiate post-graduate course in High Energy Physics. Paper 1: The Standard Model

Similar documents
752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

Particle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet

The path integral for photons

Quantum Field Theory 2 nd Edition

QED and the Standard Model Autumn 2014

Maxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density

The Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology

Cornell University, Department of Physics

Quantum Field Theory. and the Standard Model. !H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS MATTHEW D. SCHWARTZ. Harvard University

Quantum Electrodynamics Test

Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I

Physics 217 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Fall u(p,λ) by any method of your choosing.

Derivation of Electro Weak Unification and Final Form of Standard Model with QCD and Gluons 1 W W W 3

The Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local Gauge Transformations Dynamics of Field Ten

Lecture 10. September 28, 2017

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 8: Lectures 15, 16

Lecture 8. September 21, General plan for construction of Standard Model theory. Choice of gauge symmetries for the Standard Model

Dr Victoria Martin, Spring Semester 2013

Quantum Field Theory Spring 2019 Problem sheet 3 (Part I)

5 Infrared Divergences

Loop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51

Feynman Diagrams of the Standard Model Sedigheh Jowzaee

MSci EXAMINATION. Date: XX th May, Time: 14:30-17:00

Solution set #7 Physics 571 Tuesday 3/17/2014. p 1. p 2. Figure 1: Muon production (e + e µ + µ ) γ ν /p 2

Lecture 6:Feynman diagrams and QED

Fundamental Interactions (Forces) of Nature

Introduction to gauge theory

Scattering amplitudes and the Feynman rules

SISSA entrance examination (2007)

Introduction to particle physics Lecture 6

Unitarity, Dispersion Relations, Cutkosky s Cutting Rules

Lecture 3. Experimental Methods & Feynman Diagrams

2 Feynman rules, decay widths and cross sections

OUTLINE. CHARGED LEPTONIC WEAK INTERACTION - Decay of the Muon - Decay of the Neutron - Decay of the Pion

Vacuum Energy and Effective Potentials

L = 1 2 µφ µ φ m2 2 φ2 λ 0

LSZ reduction for spin-1/2 particles

REVIEW REVIEW. A guess for a suitable initial state: Similarly, let s consider a final state: Summary of free theory:

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

Quantum Field Theory Example Sheet 4 Michelmas Term 2011

Lagrangian. µ = 0 0 E x E y E z 1 E x 0 B z B y 2 E y B z 0 B x 3 E z B y B x 0. field tensor. ν =

Fermi s Golden Rule and Simple Feynman Rules

4. The Standard Model

Theory toolbox. Chapter Chiral effective field theories

Part I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

Physics 582, Problem Set 1 Solutions

2.4 Parity transformation

Outline. Charged Leptonic Weak Interaction. Charged Weak Interactions of Quarks. Neutral Weak Interaction. Electroweak Unification

Outline. Charged Leptonic Weak Interaction. Charged Weak Interactions of Quarks. Neutral Weak Interaction. Electroweak Unification

Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books

Standard Model & Beyond

Symmetry Groups conservation law quantum numbers Gauge symmetries local bosons mediate the interaction Group Abelian Product of Groups simple

Beyond Feynman Diagrams Lecture 2. Lance Dixon Academic Training Lectures CERN April 24-26, 2013

Weak interactions and vector bosons

Chiral Anomaly. Kathryn Polejaeva. Seminar on Theoretical Particle Physics. Springterm 2006 Bonn University

REVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II

Quantum Field Theory II

Review of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10

Quantum Electrodynamics and the Higgs Mechanism

Particle Physics Lecture 1 : Introduction Fall 2015 Seon-Hee Seo

Particles and Deep Inelastic Scattering

1 The muon decay in the Fermi theory

Part III. Interacting Field Theory. Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)

2P + E = 3V 3 + 4V 4 (S.2) D = 4 E

PAPER 305 THE STANDARD MODEL

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

QFT Perturbation Theory

PAPER 45 THE STANDARD MODEL

Decays of the Higgs Boson

Beta functions in quantum electrodynamics

SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course. Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C C4: PARTICLE PHYSICS

1. a) What does one mean by running of the strong coupling, and by asymptotic freedom of QCD? (1p)

Textbook Problem 4.2: We begin by developing Feynman rules for the theory at hand. The Hamiltonian clearly

New Model of massive spin-2 particle

Particle Physics WS 2012/13 ( )

On the QCD of a Massive Vector Field in the Adjoint Representation

QFT Perturbation Theory

Quantum ElectroDynamics III

Goldstone Bosons and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in QCD

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 30 Oct 2002

Introduction to string theory 2 - Quantization

Spin one matter elds. November 2015

Pion Lifetime. A. George January 18, 2012

QFT Dimensional Analysis

Theory of Elementary Particles homework XI (July??)

Evaluation of Triangle Diagrams

The hadronization into the octet of pseudoscalar mesons in terms of SU(N) gauge invariant Lagrangian

Lecture 03. The Standard Model of Particle Physics. Part II The Higgs Boson Properties of the SM

FYSH300 Particle physics 2. half-course exam (2. välikoe) : 4 problems, 4 hours.

Lattice Quantum Chromo Dynamics and the Art of Smearing

Feynman Rules of Non-Abelian Gauge Theory

lattice QCD and the hadron spectrum Jozef Dudek ODU/JLab

Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6

Theory of Elementary Particles homework VIII (June 04)

A short Introduction to Feynman Diagrams

Lectures on Chiral Perturbation Theory

Lecture 19. November 2, Comments on HW3. Introduction to EWK symmetry breaking. Hydro Model of a Quark-Gluon Plasma Tianyu Dai

Anomaly. Kenichi KONISHI University of Pisa. College de France, 14 February 2006

Transcription:

Brunel University Queen Mary, University of London Royal Holloway, University of London University College London Intercollegiate post-graduate course in High Energy Physics Paper 1: The Standard Model Monday, 10 February 014 Time allowed for Examination: 3 hours Answer ALL questions Books and notes may be consulted 1

The Standard Model and beyond part 1. Elastic electron-proton scattering. (a) Draw the Feynman diagram for the lowest order (electromagnetic) process contributing to electron-proton scattering. [3] The matrix element squared for the lowest order electromagnetic electron-proton scattering (under the assumption of the proton being a structureless, point-like Dirac particle) with given four-momenta, can be written ( e M = q e (p i ) + p (P i ) e (p f ) + p (P f ), ) [ 1 4 Tr pf / + m m γµ p i / + m m γν ] [ Pf / + M Tr M γ P/ i + M µ M where q = p f p i = P i P f, with m denoting the electron's mass, and M that of the proton. (b) Evaluate the Dirac traces here to give M = e 4 m M q 4 [ (pf.p f ) (p i.p i ) + (p f.p i ) (p i.p f ) M (p f.p i ) m (P f.p i ) + m M ]. γ ν ], [8] (c) Assuming four-vectors p i = (E, p), p f = (E, p ), P i = (M, 0), P f = (E f, P f ), show that, in the limit m E, energy-momentum conservation implies E E M = q M. [5] (d) Hence show that the cross section, dσ dω = m 4π E /E 1 + (E/M) sin θ/ M,

where M = 16π α EE m q 4 [1 + q 4EE ( ) 1 + E E + m M EE ( )] E E M can be simplied, in the limit E m but E M, to dσ dω = α cos θ 4E sin 4 θ, where θ is the angle between the outgoing and incoming electron. [4] CONTINUED 3

. Collinear factorisation of matrix elements. Throughout this question one should take the on-shell quark and gluon masses to be zero: p = g = 0. Consider an n + 1 particle process, with amplitude M (n+1), in which a quark and a gluon are produced; the momenta of the quark and the gluon are denoted p and g respectively, likewise their colour indices are i and a. In the limit that the quark and gluon momenta are collinear (p.g = E p E g (1 cos θ pg ) 0) the amplitude is dominated by diagrams involving propagators of the form 1/ (p + g), i.e. it is dominated by graphs in which the gluon is radiated by the quark leg coming out of the n particle process. This is depicted in gure 1, where the right-hand side represents the sum of all graphs involving a quark of momentum P = p + g and colour j branching to the collinear quark-gluon pair. lim p.g 0 n- n-1 M (n+1) 1 p, i g, a n- n-1 (n) M P, j p, i j 1 g, a Figure 1: Collinear limit (p + g) 0 for an arbitrary n + 1 particle process involving the production of a quark and gluon. Neglecting terms that are nite as p.g 0, using standard Feynman rules, in the collinear limit, the amplitude may then be written M (n+1) = ɛ (g) µ u (p) ( ig s T a ijγ µ ) i (p/ + g/) (p + g) M(n) j, where M (n) j denotes all contributions to the n + 1 particle amplitude, except the q (p + g, j) q (p, i) + g (g, a) branching, g s is the strong coupling constant and Tij a is a Gell-Mann matrix. (a) Derive the complex conjugate amplitude: M (n+1) = gs p.g T a j i M(n) j γ 0 (p/ + g/) γ ν u (p) ɛ (g) ν. [5] 4

(b) Summing over gluon polarizations and colour indices (a and i) gives ( ) pol,col M(n+1) M (n+1) = g sc F η µν + gµ n ν +n µ g ν δ (p.g) n.g jj u (p)γ µ (p/ + g/) M (n) j M (n) j γ 0 (p/ + g/) γ ν u (p), where η µν here denotes the usual metric tensor, and n is an unphysical gauge vector arising in the sum over gluon polarizations: n is a light-like four-vector, n = 0, which is arbitrary except for the constraints n.p 0 and n.g 0. Perform a further sum over the external quark spins in this expression to give the full spinpolarization- and colour-summed squared amplitude as ( ) M (n+1) M (n+1) = g sc F η µν + gµ n ν +n µ g ν δ (p.g) n.g jj [ Tr M (n) j ] γ 0 (p/ + g/) γ ν p/γ µ (p/ + g/) M (n) j. [5] (c) After straightforward Dirac algebra this matrix element simplies further to yield [ ] M (n+1) M (n+1) = g sc F δ jj Tr M (n) (p.g)(n.g) j γ 0 (n. (p + g) (p/ + g/) + n.pp/ p.gn/) M (n) j. Keeping only the dominant O (1/p.g) terms, one can replace in the trace and the 1/n.g part of the denominator p = zp, g = (1 z) P, where z is the momentum fraction of the daughter quark with respect to the parent with momentum P (i.e. z is just a scalar number). Using these momentum relations write M (n+1) M (n+1) in the form M (n+1) M (n+1) = g s P p.g qq (z) Tr [ M (n) j ] γ 0 P/ δ jj M (n) j, recording explicitly the form you obtain for the function P qq (z). [5] (d) Using the completeness relation for a fermion with (light-like) momentum P, uj (P ) u j (P ) = P/ δ jj, derive the factorized form of the spin- and coloursummed squared matrix element for the n + 1 particle process, in terms of the n particle one: M (n+1) M (n+1) = g s P P qq (z) M (n) M (n) 5

where M (n) is the amplitude for the n particle process, related to M (n) by M (n) j = u j (P ) M (n) j, and (hence) M (n) j = M (n) j γ 0 u j (P ). Comment on whether this result is interesting. [5] CONTINUED 6

3. Spontaneous breaking of global symmetry in a complex scalar eld theory. The Lagrangian density for a complex scalar (φ) eld theory is given by L = ( µ φ) ( µ φ ) m φ φ λ (φ φ). (a) Show that the ground/vacuum state eld conguration φ 0 satises i) φ 0 = 0 for m m > 0 and ii) φ 0 = for λ m < 0. [6] (b) Comment briey on the dierence in the vacuum state obtained for m < 0 with respect to that found for m > 0. [] (c) Assuming m < 0 and taking as the vacuum state for φ m φ 0 = φ 0, φ 0 = λ, determine the Lagrangian density in terms of two real scalar elds, φ 1 and φ, reparameterizing φ as φ = φ 0 + 1 (φ 1 + iφ ). [8] (d) Comment on the nature of the various terms in the Lagrangian that results in terms of φ 1 and φ, in particular, comment on the masses of φ 1 and φ and whether or not these are what you might have expected them to be, based on what you know of spontaneous symmetry breaking. [4] CONTINUED 7

4. Abelian gauge invariance for a complex scalar eld theory. The Lagrangian density for a complex scalar (φ) eld theory is given by L = ( µ φ) ( µ φ ) V (φ, φ ) V (φ, φ ) = m φ φ λ (φ φ). (a) Determine how the potential V (φ, φ ) changes under a local U (1) symmetry transformations φ Uφ, U = e iqλ, Λ = Λ (x). [3] (b) Determine how the derivative term µ φ changes under the same U (1) transformation. [4] (c) Dening the covariant derivative as D µ = µ + iqa µ, with A µ transforming as A µ A µ = UA µ U + i q ( µ U) U = A µ µ Λ, determine the result of the same U (1) transformation applied to D µ φ. [6] (d) Hence show that L gauged = (D µ φ) ( D µ φ ) V (φ, φ ) 1 4 F µνf µν, where F µν = µ A ν ν A ν. is U (1) gauge invariant. [7] CONTINUED 8

5. Euler-Lagrange eld equations and symmetry transformations. (a) Consider a Lagrangian density L ( φ (i), µ φ (i)) and the corresponding action, S = d 4 x L ( φ (i), µ φ (i)), where (i) labels various elds; i = 1,..., N. Consider small variations of the elds φ (i) (x, t) φ (i) (x, t) + δφ (i) (x, t), the variations δφ (i) all being zero at space-time innity (the boundary of the action integral). Applying the variational principle, in particular, by imposing the action be extremised with respect to the eld variations (δs = 0) derive the Euler- Lagrange dierential equations obeyed by the elds φ (i). [10] (b) Suppose that L, the Lagrangian density itself, is invariant under some symmetry transformation group. Under an innitesimal transformation associated with the `ath' generator of this symmetry group we denote the change in the elds and their derivatives naturally as φ (i) φ (i) + δ a φ (i), ν φ (i) ν φ (i) + ν δ a φ (i), where the subscript a on δ a is simply there to clarify that the innitesimal change δ is to be associated with a `rotation' by the `ath' generator of the group only. Assuming that the elds φ (i) and their derivatives ν φ (i) satisfy the Euler-Lagrange eld equations, compute the change in the Lagrangian density δl and show that invariance of the Lagrangian implies the conservation of four-vector currents: ν J ν a = 0 where J ν a = i L ( ν φ (i) ) δ aφ (i). [10] CONTINUED 9

. Goldstone propagator. p p p m + iϵ 3. Ghost propagator. 6. Computation of the width for Higgs boson decay to i fermion-antifermion pairs. = p p ξm + iϵ 4. W bosonsince propagator. the Higgs boson is a scalar particle, rather than associating a polarization vector or spinor to its presence as an external particle ig in µnu amplitudes (as would be the case if = it were a vector boson or a fermion), p instead p one msimply + iϵ associates a trivial factor `1' to each external Higgs boson in the amplitude. 1.4. 3-Vertices 1. Higgs-fermion-fermion-vertex The Feynman rule [PS95b]. for a Higgs For quarks boson coupling one should to a multiply fermion iswith depicted an additional in Fig.. δ AB (A, B color indices) to ensure color-charge conservation: h 0 f f = i p ξm + iϵ = i m f v = ie sinθ w (9) (10) (11) m f m W (1) Figure : The vertex Feynman rule for a Higgs boson coupling to a fermion; e is the electric charge and θ w the Weinberg angle, while m f and m W are, respectively, the mass of the fermion and the W boson. (a) Denoting the fermion momentum by p and the anti-fermion momentum by k, write down the amplitude for a Higgs boson decaying into a fermion anti-fermion pair. [5] (b) Compute the amplitude squared for a Higgs boson decaying into a fermion pair, summed over nal-state fermion spins and colours, averaged over incoming polarizations, eliminating all momenta in terms of m h (the Higgs boson mass) and m f. Do not neglect the fermion mass. [8] (c) Using the expression for the two-body Lorentz invariant phase space dlips = 1 4π p 4m h dω, where p is the three-momentum of either decay product in the Higgs boson rest frame, and dω is the solid angle, compute the width for a Higgs boson decaying into a fermion anti-fermion pair, again, eliminating all momenta in terms of m h and m f. Do not neglect the fermion mass. [7] END OF PAPER 10