Research Article Entire Solutions of an Integral Equation in R 5

Similar documents
Non-radial solutions to a bi-harmonic equation with negative exponent

Research Article Remarks on the Regularity Criterion of the Navier-Stokes Equations with Nonlinear Damping

Research Article Fixed Point Theorems of Quasicontractions on Cone Metric Spaces with Banach Algebras

Research Article Some Monotonicity Properties of Gamma and q-gamma Functions

Research Article The Dirichlet Problem on the Upper Half-Space

Research Article On Behavior of Solution of Degenerated Hyperbolic Equation

Research Article Existence for Elliptic Equation Involving Decaying Cylindrical Potentials with Subcritical and Critical Exponent

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Spring 2018 Professor: Jared Speck

Laplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas

Research Article On Global Solutions for the Cauchy Problem of a Boussinesq-Type Equation

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Fall 2011 Professor: Jared Speck

Research Article Cyclic Iterative Method for Strictly Pseudononspreading in Hilbert Space

Research Article Generalized Derivations of BCC-Algebras

Research Article Global Existence and Boundedness of Solutions to a Second-Order Nonlinear Differential System

u( x) = g( y) ds y ( 1 ) U solves u = 0 in U; u = 0 on U. ( 3)

SYMMETRY OF POSITIVE SOLUTIONS OF SOME NONLINEAR EQUATIONS. M. Grossi S. Kesavan F. Pacella M. Ramaswamy. 1. Introduction

Research Article Strong Convergence of a Projected Gradient Method

Research Article Existence and Uniqueness of Homoclinic Solution for a Class of Nonlinear Second-Order Differential Equations

Research Article Remarks on Asymptotic Centers and Fixed Points

Class Meeting # 9: Poisson s Formula, Harnack s Inequality, and Liouville s Theorem

Elliptic PDEs of 2nd Order, Gilbarg and Trudinger

Research Article Some Generalizations of Fixed Point Results for Multivalued Contraction Mappings

Research Article The Solution Set Characterization and Error Bound for the Extended Mixed Linear Complementarity Problem

Research Article Circle-Uniqueness of Pythagorean Orthogonality in Normed Linear Spaces

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces

SYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS. Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S. L. Yadava. 1. Introduction

Uniqueness of ground state solutions of non-local equations in R N

Research Article Existence and Localization Results for p x -Laplacian via Topological Methods

Research Article Quasilinearization Technique for Φ-Laplacian Type Equations

Research Article Parametric Evaluations of the Rogers-Ramanujan Continued Fraction

Research Article Ulam-Hyers-Rassias Stability of a Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equation

Research Article Existence of Periodic Positive Solutions for Abstract Difference Equations

Research Article Uniqueness of Weak Solutions to an Electrohydrodynamics Model

Minimal Surfaces: Nonparametric Theory. Andrejs Treibergs. January, 2016

CHAPTER 3. Analytic Functions. Dr. Pulak Sahoo

Research Article On the Blow-Up Set for Non-Newtonian Equation with a Nonlinear Boundary Condition

Research Article A Generalization of a Class of Matrices: Analytic Inverse and Determinant

NPTEL web course on Complex Analysis. A. Swaminathan I.I.T. Roorkee, India. and. V.K. Katiyar I.I.T. Roorkee, India

Research Article New Oscillation Criteria for Second-Order Neutral Delay Differential Equations with Positive and Negative Coefficients

Research Article Some New Fixed-Point Theorems for a (ψ, φ)-pair Meir-Keeler-Type Set-Valued Contraction Map in Complete Metric Spaces

Research Article A New Roper-Suffridge Extension Operator on a Reinhardt Domain

arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 25 Jul 2012

Research Article On New Wilker-Type Inequalities

MATH 425, FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS

HARMONIC ANALYSIS. Date:

Research Article Localization and Perturbations of Roots to Systems of Polynomial Equations

Research Article Exact Evaluation of Infinite Series Using Double Laplace Transform Technique

Research Article Coefficient Conditions for Harmonic Close-to-Convex Functions

Liouville Theorems for Integral Systems Related to Fractional Lane-Emden Systems in R N +

Fifth Abel Conference : Celebrating the Mathematical Impact of John F. Nash Jr. and Louis Nirenberg

Exercises - Chapter 1 - Chapter 2 (Correction)

Separable functions: symmetry, monotonicity, and applications

Research Article r-costar Pair of Contravariant Functors

Class Meeting # 9: Poisson s Formula, Harnack s Inequality, and Liouville s Theorem

Research Article On a Quasi-Neutral Approximation to the Incompressible Euler Equations

Research Article A Characterization of E-Benson Proper Efficiency via Nonlinear Scalarization in Vector Optimization

Research Article Another Aspect of Triangle Inequality

Research Article Multiple-Decision Procedures for Testing the Homogeneity of Mean for k Exponential Distributions

Research Article Hermite Wavelet Method for Fractional Delay Differential Equations

A Dirichlet problem in the strip

Research Article Wave Scattering in Inhomogeneous Strings

Research Article A New Class of Meromorphic Functions Associated with Spirallike Functions

1 Integration in many variables.

Research Article Modulus of Convexity, the Coeffcient R 1,X, and Normal Structure in Banach Spaces

Variational Theory of Solitons for a Higher Order Generalized Camassa-Holm Equation

On Aleksandrov-Bakelman-Pucci Type Estimates For Integro-Differential Equations

u xx + u yy = 0. (5.1)

Research Article Uniqueness Theorems on Difference Monomials of Entire Functions

Research Article On Prime Near-Rings with Generalized Derivation

Research Article Two Different Classes of Wronskian Conditions to a (3 + 1)-Dimensional Generalized Shallow Water Equation

Research Article A Note about the General Meromorphic Solutions of the Fisher Equation

Research Article Product of Extended Cesàro Operator and Composition Operator from Lipschitz Space to F p, q, s Space on the Unit Ball

Classification of Solutions for an Integral Equation

Research Article Translative Packing of Unit Squares into Squares

Research Article Nonlinear Conjugate Gradient Methods with Wolfe Type Line Search

Research Article Domination Conditions for Families of Quasinearly Subharmonic Functions

Research Article Some Surfaces with Zero Curvature in H 2 R

NONHOMOGENEOUS ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS INVOLVING CRITICAL SOBOLEV EXPONENT AND WEIGHT

Research Article He s Variational Iteration Method for Solving Fractional Riccati Differential Equation

Research Article Sufficient Conditions for λ-spirallike and λ-robertson Functions of Complex Order

Research Article Hybrid Algorithm of Fixed Point for Weak Relatively Nonexpansive Multivalued Mappings and Applications

Research Article Approximation of Analytic Functions by Bessel s Functions of Fractional Order

On semilinear elliptic equations with nonlocal nonlinearity

Research Article On the System of Diophantine Equations

Some lecture notes for Math 6050E: PDEs, Fall 2016

MINIMAL GRAPHS PART I: EXISTENCE OF LIPSCHITZ WEAK SOLUTIONS TO THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH C 2 BOUNDARY DATA

Research Article The Existence of Fixed Points for Nonlinear Contractive Maps in Metric Spaces with w-distances

CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN ELLIPTIC CURVES IN EDWARDS-BERNSTEIN AND WEIERSTRASS FORMS

Research Article A New Fractional Integral Inequality with Singularity and Its Application

MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9

In this chapter we study elliptical PDEs. That is, PDEs of the form. 2 u = lots,

ELLIPTIC PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS EXERCISES I (HARMONIC FUNCTIONS)

Suggested Solution to Assignment 7

Research Article Identifying a Global Optimizer with Filled Function for Nonlinear Integer Programming

Research Article Nonnormal Edge-Transitive Cubic Cayley Graphs of Dihedral Groups

Radial Symmetry of Minimizers for Some Translation and Rotation Invariant Functionals

Research Article Equivalent Lagrangians: Generalization, Transformation Maps, and Applications

Sobolev Spaces. Chapter 10

Research Article On Maps of Period 2 on Prime and Semiprime Rings

Derivations on Trellises

Transcription:

ISRN Mathematical Analysis Volume 03, Article ID 3839, 7 pages http://dx.doi.org/0./03/3839 Research Article Entire Solutions of an Integral Equation in Xin Feng and Xingwang Xu Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Block S7 (SOC), 0 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 9076 Correspondence should be addressed to Xingwang Xu; matxuxw@nus.edu.sg Received 9 May 03; Accepted 7 June 03 Academic Editors: G. Gripenberg, M. McKibben, and M. Winter Copyright 03 X. Feng and X. Xu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We will study the entire positive C 0 solution of the geometrically and analytically interesting integral equation: u(x) = / x y u q (y)dy with 0<qin. We will show that only when q=, there are positive entire solutions which are given by the closed form u(x) = c( + x ) / up to dilation and translation. The paper consists of two parts. The first part is devoted to showing that q must be equal to if there exists a positive entire solution to the integral equation. The tool to reach this conclusion is the wellknown Pohozev identity. The amazing cancelation occurred in Pohozev s identity helps us to conclude the claim. It is this exponent which makes the moving sphere method work. In the second part, as normal, we adopt the moving sphere method based on the integral form to solve the integral equation.. Introduction In this paper, we will study a very special type of the integral equation. From an analytical point of view, such equation is interesting to be studied. We should point out that even forradiuscase,theanalysisoftheequationhasbeenalready difficult. The method of moving planes has become a very powerful tool in the study of nonlinear elliptic equations; see Alexandrov [], Serrin [], Gidas et al. [3], and others. The moving plane method can be applied to prove the radial symmetry of solutions,andthenoneonlyneedstoclassifyradialsolutions. The method of moving planes in the integral form has been developed by Chen and Li []. This technique requires not only to prove that the solutions are radially symmetric, but also to take care of a possible singularity at origin. We note that in [], Li and Zhang have given different proofs to some previous established Liouville type theorems based on the method of moving sphere. It is this method that we applied to the integral equation to capture the solutions directly. As usual, in order for such a method to work, Pohozev s identity is a must. In our argument, we derive and use this powerful identity to conclude that the negative exponent q =. Then it is the method of moving spheres in the integral form which helps us to deduce the exact solution to the integral equation in this paper, instead of only getting radius solutions orprovingradialsymmetryofsolutions. The organization of the paper is as follows. In Section, we prove that q=. In this part, we use integration by parts to derive Pohozev s identity in the form Δ 3 u=u q.itiseasy to observe that if u solves our integral equation, then u also solves the differential equation Δ 3 u=u q.thuswecanput the integral form into Pohozev s identity to calculate every term. It turns out that the boundary integral term tends to zero which forces q=unless u + which is not allowed. In the third section, we adopt the moving sphere method in the integral form to solve the integral equation with q=.. q= Themainpurposeinthissectionistoshowthefollowing theorem. It is this exact exponent that makes the moving sphere workable for the integral equation. Notice that it is not hard to see that every C 0 positive solution of the integral equation is C 6. Thus in the following, we mainly assume that the solution is in C 6 ( ). Theorem. Suppose that u is a C 6 entire positive solution of the integral equation u (x)= x y u q (y) dy in, =ω with q>0,thenq=. ()

ISRN Mathematical Analysis Lemma. If u(x) satisfies (),thenδ 3 u(x) = u q (x). Proof. By direct calculation, we have Δ x u (x) = Δ x ( x y )u q (y) dy = x y u q (y) dy; Δ x u (x) = Δ C x ( x y )u q (y) dy = 8 x y 3 u q (y) dy. Since K(r) = (/ 3ω )r 3 is the fundamental solution of Laplace equation in,itfollowsthat Δ 3 8 xu (x) = ( 3ω ) Δ x ( 3ω x y 3 )u q (y) dy = ω u q (x) =u q (x). Thusthelemmaistrue. () (3) I = (x Br (0) u)q(x)u q (x)dx; I = Br (x u) (0) Δ 3 x u(x). First, rewrite I as I = [x ( u q (x) )] Q (x) dx. (8) q Using integration by parts, we have I = q u q (x) Q (x) rdδ q (Q + x Q) u q (x) dx. Now, the Second Green identity implies that I = [(x u) Δ u (Δ u) r + Δ (x u) Δ udx = (x u) ]dδ r (9) [r u Δ u (Δ u) r r r (r u r )]dδ+i 3 +I, (0) I 3 = Br (0) ΔuΔ udx; I = Br (0) x (Δu)Δ udx. As for I,sinceΔ(x u) = Δu + x Δu and by the Second Green identity again, we obtain Lemma 3. If u>0is the solution of the equation Δ 3 x u (x) =Q(x) u q (x) in, () then the following Pohozev identity holds: ( + q ) Qu q dx + P (u, r) = q rqu q dδ q (x Q) u q dx, () P (u, r)= [r u Δ u Δ u r r r (r u r )+ r( Δu r ) Δu r (r Δu r )+ rδuδ u + u r Δ u u u Δ r ] dδ. (6) Proof. Multiplying x uon the both sides of () and integrating over the ball,onehas 0= (x u)[δ 3 x u (x) Q(x) u q (x)]dx=i I, (7) I = Δ [x Δu] Δu dx + [x Δu Δu r = [Δ u+x Δ u] Δu dx Hence, + [r( Δu r ) I =I 3 + x Δ uδu dx + [r( Δu r ) Observe that I + x Δ uδu dx = x (ΔuΔ u) dx (x Δu) Δu] dδ r r (r Δu )Δu] dδ. r r (r Δu )Δu] dδ. r = rδuδ udδ ΔuΔ udx = rδuδ udδ I 3 ; () () (3)

ISRN Mathematical Analysis 3 that is, I = rδuδ udδ I 3. () Combining ()and(), we have I = 3 I 3 + [r( Δu r ) r (r Δu r )Δu+rΔuΔ u] dδ. () Thus I = I 3+ [r u Δ u Δ u r r r (r u r )+ r( Δu r ) Δu r (r Δu r )+ rδuδ u] dδ. (6) To deal with I 3, we observe that if multiplying u on both sides of () and integrating over the ball,onehas 0= u[δ 3 u Q(x) u q ]dx. (7) Thus, with the help of the Second Green identity, one obtains Q (x) u q dx = uδ 3 udx = ΔuΔ udx+ [u Δ u u r r Δ u] dδ. Therefore, we get I 3 = ΔuΔ udx (8) = Q (x) u q dx + [ u r Δ u u Δ u r ] dδ. (9) Put it into (6)toconcludethat I = Qu q dx + [r u Δ u Δ u r r r (r u r )+ r( Δu r ) Δu r (r Δu r )+ rδuδ u + u r Δ u u u Δ r ] dδ. (0) Put I and I into the equation I I =0and rearrange the terms; then we get the desired identity. Thus the lemma holds. Lemma. If u is an entire solution of the integral equation (), then q=. Proof. Define d = (/ ) u q (y)dy, d = (/ ) y u q (y)dy.thenitfollowsthat u (x) = x y u q (y) dy x u q (y) dy + y u q (y) dy = x d+d. If 0<q 6,then d =u(0) = y u q (y) dy y ( y d+d ) q (y) dy = ω + r (rd + d C ) q dr 0 =, () () which contradicts the assumption that u is an entire solution. Therefore, we only consider the case q>6. Rewrite the equation as u (x) =d x +β (x), (3) β (x) = [ x y x ]u q (y) dy. () Clearly, we have β (x) y u q (y) dy = d. () And, by (), one has u r = x (x y) r x y u q (y) dy = u q (y) dy+ := d + β (x), r [ (x y) x y x r ]u q (y) dy (6) β (x) = (x y) x r x y x y u q (y) dy. (7)

ISRN Mathematical Analysis Note that β (x) canbecontrolledasfollows: β (x) = [ x y x ] x y +y (x y) x y u q (y) dy y u q (y) dy =d. (8) Clearly, with the definition of β (x), thefollowingholds true: r u r =dr+β (x). (9) Then differentiate it to get r (r u r ) =d+ [ (x y) x y x (x y)(x y) x y 3 x x ] := d + β 3 (x), x r u q (y) dy β 3 (x) = [( x x y ) One observes that x β 3 (x) = [ x ( x x y M 3, u q (y) dy x y (30) x (x y)y (x y) r x y 3 ]u q (y) dy. (3) x y u q (y) dy ) x (x y)y (x y) x y 3 ] (3) for a constant independent of x and for x sufficiently large. Here we have used the assumption that q > 6 and u(x) = d x + β (x), β (x) is bounded by a constant. The integral over canbecontrolledasfollows: x y x y u q (y) dy = + ) x y (A A x y u q (y) dy =S +S, (33) A ={y : x y x /}, A ={y : x y x /}. Then S = A x y x y u q (y) dy A y u q (y) dy d. (3) As for S, y A implies that y x + x y (3/) x and y x x y (/) x. Therefore S = A x y x y u q (y) dy q [ min u(y)] [ x / y / A x y dy] q =[ min u(y)] x / y / [ min u(y)] qω 6 x / y / 7. x / [ω r 3 dr] 0 (3) Since u(x) = O( x ) and q>6,soi is bounded for x R 0 when R 0 is large enough. It follows that x β 3 (x) is bounded for x R 0 when R 0 is large enough. Now we deal with the higher order derivatives. First Δu (x) = x y u q (y) dy = x d+β (x), (36) β (x) = [ x y x ]u q (y) dy. (37) For a constant M independent of x, when x is large enough, it is easy to see that x β (x) = x [ x x y x x y ]u q (y) dy M, by the estimation in β 3. x y x y u q (y) dy (38)

ISRN Mathematical Analysis Δu r Then, by computation, one gets = [ (x y) x x y 3 x ]u q (y) dy = x d+ [ (x y) x x y 3 x + x ]u q (y) dy = x d+β (x), r (39) β (x) = (x y) x [ x y 3 + x ]u q (y) dy. (0) And as usual, we observe that x β (x) = [ (x y) x x x y 3 + x ]u q (y) dy = x x y 3 x (x y) x x y 3 u q (y) dy = x [ x y (x y)(x y) x x (x y)] x y 3 u q (y) dy = x [( x y x )x (x y) x y y (x y)] x y 3 u q (y) dy A ={y : x y x /}, A ={y : x y x /}. Then S 3 = A x y x y u q (y) dy A y u q (y) dy d. (3) As for S, y A implies that y x + x y (3/) x and y x x y (/) x. Therefore S = A x y x y u q (y) dy q 3 [ min u(y)] [ x / y / A x y dy] q 3 =[ min u(y)] x / y / x [ min u(y)] qω 6 x / y /. x / [ω r dr] 0 () Since u(x) = O( x ) and q>6,sos is bounded for x R 0 when R 0 is large enough. It follows that x β (x) is bounded for x R 0 when R 0 is large enough. Since r( Δu/ r) = (/ x )d + β (x),weobtain r (r Δu r )= x d+β 6 (x), () [ x y x y + x y x y ]u q (y) dy. Similarly, we have the following estimation: x y x y u q (y) dy + ) x y =(A A x y u q (y) dy =S 3 +S, () () β 6 (x) = r β (x) = (x y) x [ x y 3 + x ] x x u q (y) dy = [ (x y) x y 3(x y) x(x y) x y x x 3 ] x x u q (y) dy

6 ISRN Mathematical Analysis = { x x y [3 x y (x y) x u q (y) dy +3y (x y)(x y) x x (x y) x y x x y ] x } = [ (x y) x x x y 3 + 3y (x y)(x y) x x x y x x y 3 x ]u q (y) dy. As before, we can estimate β 6 (x) as x 3 β 6 (x) = [ (x y) x x x y 3 x x y 3 x ]u q (y) dy = [( (x y) x x x y 3 x x y 3 ) [ x x y x y 3 (x y) x x +( x y 3 x ) (6) + 3y (x y)(x y) x x x y + 3y (x y)(x y) x x x y ]u q (y) dy +(( x x (x y) x x y x (x y) + x x y y (x y)) ( x y 3 ) ) + 3y (x y)(x y) x x x y ]u q (y) dy x 3 y x y 3 u q (y) dy+ x y x y u q (y) dy + M 6, x y x y u q (y) dy+ x 3 y x y 3 u q (y) dy (7) for a constant independent of x and for x sufficiently large. We have proved that the first integral is bounded in the previous estimation. The second integral over can be controlled as follows: x 3 y x y 3 u q (y) dy + ) x 3 y =(A A x y 3 u q (y) dy =S +S 6, (8) A ={y : x y x /}, A ={y : x y x /}. Then S = A x 3 y x y 3 u q (y) dy 8A y u q (y) dy 8d. (9) As for S 6, y A implies that y x + x y (3/) x and y x x y (/) x. Therefore S 6 = A x 3 y x y 3 u q (y) dy q [ min u(y)] [ x / y / A x y 3 dy] q =[ min u(y)] x / y / [ min u(y)] qω 6 x / y /. x / [ω rdr] 0 (0) Since u(x) = O( x ) and q>6,sos 6 is bounded for x R 0 when R 0 is large enough. It follows that x 3 β 6 (x) is bounded for x R 0 when R 0 is large enough. Once again, calculation shows that Δ u (x) = 8 x y 3 u q (y) dy = 8 x 3 d+β 7 (x), () β 7 (x) = 8 [ x 3 x y 3 ]u q (y) dy. ()

ISRN Mathematical Analysis 7 We still need to control β 7 (x) which can be done as follows: x β 7 (x) = 8 [ x x x y 3 ]u q (y) dy = 8 x R x y ( x x y+ y ) x x y 3 u q (y) dy = 8 x 3 [ R x y x ]+ x x y ( x y + y ) x y 3 u q (y) dy 8 x 3 y x y 3 u q (y) dy + 8 x y x y u q (y) dy + 8 x y x y u q (y) dy M 7, (3) for a constant independent of x and for x sufficiently large. Now, the third integral over can be controlled as follows: x y x y u q (y) dy = x y y x y x y u q (y) dy x y x y [ x y + x x y ]u q (y) dy x y x y u q (y) dy + x y x y u q (y) dy. () The two integrals are bounded as we have shown before. It follows that x β 7 (x) is bounded for x R 0 when R 0 is large enough. Finally, by computation, one obtains Δ u r = (x y) x x y x u q (y) dy = x d+β 8 (x), () β 8 (x) = [ (x y) x x y x x ] u q (y) dy. (6) The estimate on β 8 (x) can proceed as follows: x β 8 (x) = [ (x y) x x x y x ]u q (y) dy = x (x y) x x x y x y u q (y) dy = (([ x 3 R x y 3 ] x x (x y)+ x x y 3 y (x y))( x y 3 y (x y)) ) u q (y) dy [ x 3 x y ( x x y+ y )] x R x y + u q (y) dy x y x y u q (y) dy [ x y 3 x y + x y x y 3 + x y x y 3 ]u q (y) dy + M 8, x y x y u q (y) dy (7) for a constant independent of x and for x sufficiently large. As before, the aforementioned first integral can be controlled as follows: x y x y u q (y) dy =(A + A ) x y x y u q (y) dy =S 7 +S 8, (8) A ={y : x y x /}, A ={y : x y x /}.

8 ISRN Mathematical Analysis Then Also we have S 7 = A x y x y u q (y) dy 6A y u q (y) dy (9) [r u Δ u Δ u r r r (r u r ) + r( Δu r ) Δu r (r Δu r ) 6d. As for S 8, y A implies that y x + x y (3/) x and y x x y (/) x. Therefore S 8 = A x y x y u q (y) dy q [ min u(y)] dy] x / y / [A q =[ min u(y)] x / y / [ min u(y)] qω 6 x / y /, x / [ω dr] 0 (60) which is bounded, since u(x) = O( x ) and q>6,soi 8 is bounded for x R 0 when R 0 is large enough. Besides, y x x y 3 u q (y) dy = x y x y y x y u q (y) dy x y x y u q (y) dy + x 3 y x y 3 u q (y) dy, (6) andthetwointegralshavebeenshowntobeboundedbefore. It follows that x β 8 (x) is bounded for x R 0 when R 0 is large enough. Combining these estimates, we can see that () x β (x)β 8 (x) 0 as x ; () x β 3 (x)β 7 (x) 0 as x ; (3) x 3 β (x) 0as x ; + rδuδ u+ u r Δ u u u Δ r ] =r[d+ β (x) ][ r x d+β 8 (x)] [d+β 3 (x)][ 8 x 3 d+β 7 (x)] + r[ x d+β (x) r ] [ x d+β 6 (x)][ x d+β (x)] + r[ x d+β (x)][ 8 x 3 d+β 7 (x)] + [d + β (x) ][ 8 r x 3 d+β 7 (x)] [d x +β (x)][ x d+β 8 (x)] =d[ x β (x) + 0 x β (x) + 8 x 3 β 3 (x) + 6 x β (x) + x β (x) + x β 6 (x) + 3 β 7 (x) + x β 8 (x)] +[β (x) β 8 (x) β 3 (x) β 7 (x) + r β (x) β (x) β 6 (x) + rβ (x) β 7 (x)+ r β (x) β 7 (x) β (x) β 8 (x)]. (6) Observe that x [β (x) β 8 (x) β 3 (x) β 7 (x)+ r β (x) () x β (x)β 6 (x) 0 as x ; () x β (x)β 7 (x) 0 as x ; (6) x 3 β (x)β 7 (x) 0 as x ; (7) x β (x)β 8 (x) 0 as x. β (x) β 6 (x) + rβ (x) β 7 (x) + r β (x) β 7 (x) β (x) β 8 (x)] 0 as x. (63)

ISRN Mathematical Analysis 9 The coefficient of d is given by [ x β (x) + 0 x β (x) + 8 x 3 β 3 (x) + 6 x β (x) + x β (x) + x β 6 (x) + 3 β 7 (x) + x β 8 (x)] =[ x ( 3β (x) +β (x))+ 8 x 3 β 3 (x) x (3β (x) +β (x)) x β 6 (x) + 3 β 7 (x) + x β 8 (x)] = [( x y x +(8 x x y 8 x 3 (x y) x +0 x x y 8 x 3 ) 8 x (x y)y (x y) x x y 3 ) +( x x y +8 x 3 +6(x y) x x y 3 x ) +( 6 (x y) x x y 3 x y (x y)(x y) x x x y +8 x y 3 +8 x 3 ) +( x 3 x y 3 ) +( (x y) x x y x 3 )] u q (y) dy = { x x y [ 3 x y 6 +(x y) x x y x x y x (x y)y (x y) x y 6y (x y)(x y) x x x x y +3 (x y) x x ]} S = [ 3 x y 6 +(x y) x x y x x y x (x y)y (x y) x y 6y (x y)(x y) x x x x y +3(x y) x x ] =[x (x y) x y +3y (x y) x y x x y x (x y)+ x x y y (x y) x (x y)y (x y) x y 6y (x y)(x y) x x + x x (x y)+ x y (x y)] =x (x y)[ x y x x y + x ] +y (x y)[3 x y + x x y x And directly calculation gives (x y) x y 6x (x y) x + x ]. (6) [3 x y + x x y x (x y) x y 6x (x y) x + x ] =x (x y) x y + x x y 6x (x y) x + x 3y (x y) x y =(x y) +y (x y)[x (x y)+ x 3y (x y)]. (66) By substitution, we have S = x (x y) [y (x y) y (x y) + (x y) y (x y)+(x y) ] +y (x y)(x y) [y (x y)] [x (x y)+ x 3y (x y)] u q (y) dy = { x x y S} u q (y) dy, (6) = x (x y)[y (x y)] +(x y)x (x y)y (x y) x x[y (x y)] +(x y) x (x y) +y (x y)(x y) +3[y (x y)] 3

0 ISRN Mathematical Analysis =y (x y) [ x (x y)+ y (x y) y (x y)] +(x y) x (x y)+y (x y) (x y) +3[y (x y)] 3 = x (x y)y (x y)+(x y) x (x y) +y (x y)[6 x y (x y) +3[y (x y)] ] y (x y)y (x y) =8 x y (x y) 6 x y 0 y (x y) + y (x y) 3 y 6. Hence [ x ( 3β (x)+β (x))+ 8 x 3 β 3 (x) x (3β (x)+β (x)) x β 6 (x)+ 3 β 7 (x)+ x β 8 (x)] = { x x y [8 x y (x y) 6 x y (67) 0 y (x y) + y (x y) 3 y 6 ]u q (y)}dy. (68) Now, integrate it over with r= x,andweobtain that A:= { x x y [8 x y (x y) 6 x y 0 y (x y) + y (x y) 3 y 6 ] u q (y)}dydδ = ( + ) y < x y > x { x x y [8 x y (x y) 8 x y + x y 0 y (x y) + y (x y) 3 y 6 ] u q (y) dδ} dy := I +I +I 3 +II +II +II 3, (69) I = y < x x x y [8 x y (x y) 8 x y ] u q (y) dy dδ 3 = y y < x x u q (y) [ (x y) y x y dδ] dy. (70) It is clear that Δ x [(x y) y ]=0, by Poisson representation formula for harmonic function, the previous integral equals 3 I = y y < x x u q (y) [ x ω x y (y y y )] dy =0. (7) Similarly, calculation gives Δ x [ x y 0 y (x y) ]= 0 y 0 y =0, and then Poisson representation formula implies that I = y < x x x y = y < x x u q (y) [ x y 0 y (x y) ]u q (y) dy dδ x y 0 y (x y) x y dδ dy = y < x x u q (y) [ x ω x y ( y 6 0 y 6 )] dy = y < x x u q (y) [ x ω x y ( 8 y 6 )] dy. (7)

ISRN Mathematical Analysis Once again, Δ x [ y (x y) 3 y 6 ]=0,andPoisson formula leads to I 3 = y < x x x y [ y (x y) 3 y 6 ]u q (y) dδ dy = y < x x u q (y) y (x y) 3 y 6 x y dδ dy = y < x x u q (y) [ x ω x y (8 y 6 )] dy. Notice that I +I 3 =0. Next, consider the following integral: II = y > x x x y [8 x y (x y) + y (x y)] u q (y) dδ dy = y > x x u q (y) [8 x y + y ] x y (73) x y dδ dy. (7) Setting z=( x y)/ y, the previous integral is equal to II = y > x x u q (y) [8 x y + y ] x ( x z/ z ) x ( x z/ z ) dδ dy = y > x x u q (y) [8 x y + y ] ( x / z )x z ( x / z ) dδ dy x z = y > x x u q (y) [8 x y + y ]( x 3 z ) x ω x z z zdy = u q (y) y > x Also, we have x [ 3ω [ y ( y x ) x +ω y y x ]dy. (7) II = y > x x x y [ 8 x y 3 y 6 ] u q (y) dδ dy = y > x x u q (y) [ 8 x y 3 y 6 ] x y dδ dy = y > x x u q (y) [ 8 x y 3 y 6 ] x ( x z/ z ) dδ dy = y > x x u q (y) [ 8 x y 3 y 6 ] ( x z ) dδ dy x z = y > x x u q (y) [ 8 x y 3 y 6 ] = y > x ( x z ) x ω x z dy u q (y) [ 3ω y x y x ω y 3 y x ]dy. (76) Finally, it follows from variable change and Poisson formula for the harmonic function ( 0 y (x y) + x y ) that II 3 = y > x x x y [ 0 y (x y) + x y ] u q (y) dδ dy

ISRN Mathematical Analysis = y y > x x u q (y) x ( x z/ z ) = y y > x x u q (y) [ 0(x x z z ) + x 6 z ]dδdy ( x / z ) x z = y y > x x [ 0( (x z) x z ) + x 6 z ]dδdy x y u q (y) 0(x z) + x z x z dδ dy = y x ω y > x x 3 u q (y) x z [8 z ]dy = 3ω u q (y) y > x x ( y x ) y dy. (77) Combining those previous calculations, we can conclude that A=I +I +I 3 +II +II +II 3 = u q (y) y > x + y > x [ x 3ω [ y ( y x ) +ω x y ] y dy x ] u q (y) [ 3ω y x y x ω y 3 y x ]dy 3ω u q (y) y > x = ω u q (y) y > x y dy 0, x ( y x ) y dy as x,sinceu(0) = u q (y) y dy < +. (78) What we have shown so far is that, if u is regular, that is, q>6,then P (u, r) 0 as r. (79) Setting Q=,whenq>6,wehave ru q dδ 0, (80) as x,sinceu(x) = O( x ) when x is large enough. Hence, let x, and we conclude that q=from (). 3. Moving Sphere Method This section is to run the method of moving sphere for the integral equation with the exact exponent q=. First, define V(x) = x u(x/ x ) and V (x) = u(x/ ); it is rather easy to see that V (x) = ( x /)υ(( x)/ x ). Lemma. If one sets ω (x) = υ(x) + υ (x), thenω (x) = B [G(x, z)ψ(z)ω (z)]dz, ψ = (/(υ υ )) ] 0; G(x, z) = [( z /) x (( z)/ z ) x z ] 0when x and z. Inparticular, ω (0) = B [ z ]ψ(z)ω (z)dz,whichbelongsto(0, + ). [ 0 i=0 υi υ 0 i Proof. Since u(x) = (/ ) x y u (y)dy, V (x) = x u( x x ) = x x x y u (y) dy = R y x = (I +I ), y y u (y) dy (8) I = B/ [ y x (y/ y ) u (y)]dy, I = R [ y x (y/ y ) u (y)]dy. /B / As for I,sety=z/ to obtain I = [ z B x z/ z/ u ( z )] d z = [ B z x ( z z ) u ( z )] dz. (8)

ISRN Mathematical Analysis 3 As for I,ifwesety = z/ z,thenweobtain I = [ z B z [ x z/ z z/ z u ( z z ) ] ] = B [ z x z u ( z z )]dz. Similarly, one can write V (x) as V (x) =u( x ) d z z = x + )[ (B / /B / y u (y)] dy = (I 3 +I ). As for I 3,bysettingy=z/, one concludes that (83) (8) Now, since z x z z x z = z [ x x, z + z z ] [ x x, z + z ] = x z + z x = x ( z )+( z ) =( x )( z ) = ( x )( z ), (88) G(x, z) = [( z /) x ( z/ z ) x z ] 0when x and z. Put x=0to obtain I 3 = B [ x z u ( z )] dz. (8) For I,asbefore,sety = z/ z to get I = [ z 0 x z B z u ( z )]dz. (86) z Therefore, combining these previous calculations, we get ω (x) = [(I I )+(I I 3 )] = [ z x z B z = [ z B x z z [ υ (z) υ ω (z) x z ][V (z) V (z)]dz x z ] = B [G (x, z) ψ (z) ω (z)]dz, (z) ]ω (z) dz (87) ψ = [(υ (z) υ (z))/ω (z)] = (/υ υ ) ] 0and G = [( z /) x ( z/ z ) x z ]. [ 0 i=0 υi υ 0 i ω (0) = B [G (0, z) ψ (z) ω (z)]dz which belongs to (0, + ). Thuswecompletetheproof. = B [ z ] ψ (z) ω (z) dz, (89) Proposition 6. If >0is large enough, then ω (x) 0 for all x such that x. Proof. We prove that ω (x) 0 when >0is large enough by three steps. Step. There exists R 0 >0such that for R 0 x /, we have ω 0. It is clear to see that x/ x = / x /R 0 ; x/ / /R 0. When R 0 is large enough, ω (x) = x u( x x )+u(x ) = x [u (0) +O( )]+[u(0) +O( x x )] x u (0) >0. (90) Step. There exists an R >R 0 such that for R / x,wehaveδω 0and ω 0.

ISRN Mathematical Analysis First, we calculate Δω. In fact Δω = Δ(u(x/ )) + Δ( x u(x/ x )), Δ(u(x/ )) = (/ )(Δu)(x/ ) and Δ x u(x/ x ) = (Δ x )u(x/ x ) + (Δu(x/ x )) x + x u(x/ x ). To carry out the detail, forn =one observes that Δ x = x, x u( x x )= x 3 u i ( x x ) x i, Δu ( x )= x (Δu) ( x )+( 6) x x u i ( x x i= x ) x i. (9) Thus Δω = x [ x 3 (Δu) (x ) x (Δu) ( x x ) +8 x i= i= (9) u i ( x x ) x i V (x)]. x If R >,then x/ x =/ x /R if x R.Let C=max B u. Then 8 i= u i(x/ x ) (x i / x ) 8C/ x when R is large enough. Now let B=max B Δu. Hencewe have x 3 (Δu) ( x ) x (Δu) ( x x ) 3 B+ x B 3 B. (93) Notice that if x is sufficiently large, then V(x) (u(0)/ ) x. Therefore if >0is large enough, then Δω (x) 0 for R / x. Besides, ω (x) x = =0by definition, and ω (x) x =/ 0 by Step. Thus the maximal principle implies that ω (x) 0 on the domain R / x. Step 3. There exists an R R such that ω (x) 0 for x R 0 for large enough. On the one hand, when x is small, V(x) = x u(x/ x ) x c x/ x =c,andv is continuous on the rest of ball, so V is bounded for x R 0. On the other hand, the definition V (x) = u(x/ ) implies that V (x) (u(0)/) when is large enough. Therefore, ω (x) > 0 for 0< x R 0 when is large enough. Combining Steps to 3, we have ω (x) 0. Thuswecompletetheproofofthisproposition. Now, for any b, we denote u(x + b) by u b (x), V b (x) by x u b (x/ x ),andsetω,b (x) = V b (x) + (V b ) (x). By Proposition 6,if is large enough, then ω,b 0.Thus, we define b = inf{ > 0 : ω μ,b (x) 0 in B μ (0) for <μ< + }. Proposition 7. There exists b such that b >0. Proof. Suppose that the proposition is not true. Hence b =0 for all b; thatis,forallb and all >0,wealwayshave ω,b (x) 0 for all x B (0). Note that is, ω x,b (x) = V b (x) + x V b ( x x ) =0, = x ω x,b (rx) = V b (rx) +rv b ( x r ) 0 when 0<r<. (9) Therefore, it follows that (d/(dr))ω x,b (rx) r= 0;that V b (rx) x + V b ( x r )+r V b ( x r )( x r ) 0. (9) r= Simplifying this, we get ( V b ) x+v b (x) 0, (96) V b (x) = x u((x/ x )+b). Setting y = x/ x,bycalculationweget V b x= x u( x x +b)+ x ( u) ( x x +b) x x = x u(y+b) x ( u) (y + b) y. (97) Substituting (97)into(96)anddoingvariablechange,we obtain u(y)+( u) (y) (y b) 0. (98) Then both sides being divided by b and sending b to +,letb = b ω b,weget ( u) (y) (ω b ) 0. (99) Since the previous inequality holds for all b,so ( u) = 0. It implies that u is a constant which contradicts u(x) = (/ ) x y u (y)dy. Thus this proposition holds. Proposition 8. Suppose that there exists a point b such that b >0;thenω b,b 0for all x. Proof. Without loss of generality, we assume that b = 0. Suppose that the proposition is not true; then ω 0,0(x) 0. In order to complete the argument, we need to do some preparations. First of all, setting C 0 = min ω x B0 / 0,0(x) > 0,thenitis clear that ω 0 (x) C 0 >0 x B 0 /. (00)

ISRN Mathematical Analysis Next, calculate ( G(x, z)/ η x ) x =0 as follows. Sincewehavetheformula which is because thus, ( z G (x, z) = z z x z z x z z = z = z ) = x z x x x z z,x z z [ x, x x, z + z z ] = z x x, z + = x =( x x z z [ z, z x, z + x x ] z x x ), x z = x Hence, by direct calculation, one obtains G(x, z) η x x =0 = ( x G (x, z) i i x i x ) x = 0 = = = i= i= i= [ z [( z [( z x x i ( z z x i x ] ) x i x i ( z i / z ) x ( z/ z ) x ] x i ( z i / z ) i= ( x / z ) z ( x/ x ) x = 0, (0) z x x (0) x z. (03) [( x i x z ) x i x ] x i z i x z ) x i x ] x i z i x z ) x = 0 = z 0 0 x z. (0) It clearly implies that whenever z. Therefore, by Lemma, ω 0 (x) η x B0 (0) G (x, z) 0 η (0) x B0 (0) = z 0 B 0 (0) 0 x z ψ (z) ω 0 (z) dz. (06) By the definition of 0 and our assumption that ω 0,0(x) 0,fromLemma, weseethatω 0 (x) > 0 inside the ball B 0 (0). Then, at every boundary point x,wehave ω 0 (x) η x B0 (0) <0. (07) Besides, the definition of 0 implies that there is a sequence k such that k 0, k < 0, inf ω k (x) <0. B k (0) (08) It follows from (08) that there exists x k B k (0) such that ω k (x k )= min (x) <0. B k (0) (09) Since ω k (x) 0 for x = k,wehave x k < k < 0.Clearly, x k has a convergent subsequence, still denoted by x k,witha limit point x 0.Also, ω k (x k )=0.Thenx 0 satisfies ω 0 (x 0 ) =0, ω 0 (x 0 ) 0. (0) Now consider the following two cases. Case ( x 0 < 0 ).Theconclusionω 0 (x 0 ) 0contradicts the fact that ω 0 (x 0 ) is strictly positive inside the ball B 0 (0). Case ( x 0 = 0 ). Then the fact that ω 0 (x 0 )=0contradicts (07). Hence, the proposition follows. Proposition 9. For all b,onehas b >0. Proof. It follows from Propositions 7 and 8 that there exists some b such that b >0and ω b (x) = 0;thatis,V b (x) = (V b (x)) ;thatis, x u b ( x x ) = b u b ( x ). () b Setting y = x/ x,weget y u b (y) = b u b ( y b y ). ()

6 ISRN Mathematical Analysis It follows that lim [ y y u b (y)] = b u b (0). (3) Suppose that there exists a point b such that b =0. Then ω,b (x) = V b (x) + (V b (x)) 0for all >0and x B (0)/{0}. That is, u b ( x / ) x u b (x/ x ) for all >0and x B (0)\{0}. Fixing > 0 and letting x 0, wehaveu b (0) b u b (0). Therefore, b u (b) u(b). () Letting go to 0,wehave0 u(b),whichcontradictsthe fact that u isapositiveentiresolution. Hence, this proposition holds. Proposition 0. If u > 0 satisfies u(x) = (/ ) x y u (y)dy, then there exist some x 0 and constants a, d such that u(x)=(a x x 0 +d) /. Proof. From Propositions 8 and 9,weknowthatforallb, we have ω b,b 0;thatis,V b (x) = ( x / b )V b ( b x/ x ). Using V(x) = x u(x/ x ),settingy=x/ b and μ b = b, we can rewrite it as follows: u(y+b)= y μ b u(μ b y y +b). () Now setting x=y+b,thenwehave u (x) =μ b x b u( μ b (x b) x b +b). (6) Itfollowsthatthelimitlim x x u(x) exists and is equal to μ b u(b) for all b R. Then set A=lim x x u(x) = μ b u(b). Case. If A=0,thenu 0whichisimpossibletobeapositive solution. Case. IfA =0, the definition of A implies that A > 0. Without loss of generality, we can assume that A=.Now for x large, u (x) = μ 0 u {u (0) + (0) μ 0 x i x x i x +o( )}, (7) x so the coefficient of x i is (μ 0 / x )( u/ x i )(0),and u (x) = μ b u {u (b) + (b) μ b (x i b i ) x b x i x b +o( x )} =μ x b [ x + i x ( b i ) +o( x )] [u(b) + u x i (b) μ b x x i +o( x )], (8) so the coefficient of x i is (/ x ) + ( u/ x i )(b)(μ b / x ). Comparing these two coefficients and A=,we obtain Then Thus, x + u (b) μ b x i x = μ 0 u (0). (9) x x i u b u x i (b) =u 0 u x i (0) +b i. (0) u = u + x. () x i (x)x=b x i (x)x=0 x i (x)x=b It gives u (x) x =C x i. () i x=b By solving the previous equation, we obtain u (x) = x +Cx+D= x C for some x 0,equivalentto Acknowledgments +E= x x 0 +d, (3) u (x) =a( x x 0 +d) /. () The paper is mainly taken from first author s master thesis at National University of Singapore. She is sincerely grateful to her family, friends, and all other people who helped her during the completion of the project. The research of the second author is supported through his NUS research Grant R6-000--7. References [] A. D. Alexandrov, Uniqueness theorems for surfaces in the large, American Mathematical Society Translations, vol.,pp. 6, 96. [] J. Serrin, A symmetry problem in potential theory, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis,vol.3,pp.30 38,97.

ISRN Mathematical Analysis 7 [3] B.Gidas,W.M.Ni,andL.Nirenberg, Symmetryandrelated properties via the maximum principle, Communications in Mathematical Physics,vol.68,no.3,pp.09 3,979. [] W. X. Chen and C. Li, A necessary and sufficient condition for the Nirenberg problem, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics,vol.8,no.6,pp.67 667,99. [] Y. Li and L. Zhang, Liouville-type theorems and Harnack-type inequalities for semilinear elliptic equations, Journal d Analyse Mathématique,vol.90,pp.7 87,003.

Advances in Operations Research Volume 0 Advances in Decision Sciences Volume 0 Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 0 Journal of Algebra Probability and Statistics Volume 0 The Scientific World Journal Volume 0 International Journal of Differential Equations Volume 0 Volume 0 Submit your manuscripts at International Journal of Advances in Combinatorics Mathematical Physics Volume 0 Journal of Complex Analysis Volume 0 International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Journal of Stochastic Analysis Abstract and Applied Analysis International Journal of Mathematics Volume 0 Volume 0 Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 0 Volume 0 Journal of Journal of Discrete Mathematics Journal of Volume 0 Applied Mathematics Journal of Function Spaces Volume 0 Volume 0 Volume 0 Optimization Volume 0 Volume 0