Connections and geodesics in the space of metrics The exponential parametrization from a geometric perspective

Similar documents
arxiv: v3 [gr-qc] 9 Nov 2015

Observer dependent background geometries arxiv:

A solution in Weyl gravity with planar symmetry

GRAVITATION F10. Lecture Maxwell s Equations in Curved Space-Time 1.1. Recall that Maxwell equations in Lorentz covariant form are.

Problem Set #4: 4.1, 4.3, 4.5 (Due Monday Nov. 18th) f = m i a (4.1) f = m g Φ (4.2) a = Φ. (4.4)

Chapter 7 Curved Spacetime and General Covariance

matter The second term vanishes upon using the equations of motion of the matter field, then the remaining term can be rewritten

Inequivalence of First and Second Order Formulations in D=2 Gravity Models 1

Übungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.

PAPER 52 GENERAL RELATIVITY

PAPER 309 GENERAL RELATIVITY

Theoretical Cosmology and Astrophysics Lecture notes - Chapter 7

Massive gravitons in arbitrary spacetimes

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

THE RENORMALIZATION GROUP AND WEYL-INVARIANCE

Extended Space for. Falk Hassler. bases on. arxiv: and in collaboration with. Pascal du Bosque and Dieter Lüst

On asymptotic safety in matter-gravity systems

Notes on General Relativity Linearized Gravity and Gravitational waves

Asymptotic Safety in the ADM formalism of gravity

Gravitation: Tensor Calculus

Continuity Equations and the Energy-Momentum Tensor

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES

Lecturer: Bengt E W Nilsson

Causal RG equation for Quantum Einstein Gravity

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

Gravitation: Gravitation

Week 1. 1 The relativistic point particle. 1.1 Classical dynamics. Reading material from the books. Zwiebach, Chapter 5 and chapter 11

A note on the principle of least action and Dirac matrices

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Quantum Field Theory Notes. Ryan D. Reece

Physics 236a assignment, Week 2:

Gravitation: Special Relativity

Chapter 1 LORENTZ/POINCARE INVARIANCE. 1.1 The Lorentz Algebra

General Relativity (j µ and T µν for point particles) van Nieuwenhuizen, Spring 2018

Asymptotically Safe Gravity connecting continuum and Monte Carlo

Connection Variables in General Relativity

Exercise 1 Classical Bosonic String

Lorentzian elasticity arxiv:

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

The l.h.s. of this equation is again a commutator of covariant derivatives, so we find. Deriving this once more we find

WICK ROTATIONS AND HOLOMORPHIC RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

Emergent space-time and gravity in the IIB matrix model

Review of General Relativity

Variational Principle and Einstein s equations

Global aspects of Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy

UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN

Graviton Corrections to Maxwell s Equations. arxiv: (to appear PRD) Katie E. Leonard and R. P. Woodard (U. of Florida)

Notes on torsion. Arkadiusz Jadczyk. October 11, 2010

Diffeomorphism Invariant Gauge Theories

Light Propagation in the Averaged Universe. arxiv:

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

Solvable Lie groups and the shear construction

OBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES

Non-Abelian and gravitational Chern-Simons densities

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.

GENERAL RELATIVITY: THE FIELD THEORY APPROACH

Geometry of almost-product (pseudo-)riemannian manifold. manifolds and the dynamics of the observer. Aneta Wojnar

Outline 1. Introduction 1.1. Historical Overview 1.2. The Theory 2. The Relativistic String 2.1. Set Up 2.2. The Relativistic Point Particle 2.3. The

CHAPTER 4 INFLATIONARY MODEL BUILDING. 4.1 Canonical scalar field dynamics. Non-minimal coupling and f(r) theories

CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARIES

Relativistic Mechanics

Physics 411 Lecture 7. Tensors. Lecture 7. Physics 411 Classical Mechanics II

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Running Couplings in Topologically Massive Gravity

Geodesic Equivalence in sub-riemannian Geometry

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions

Self-Dual Gravity. or On a class of (modified) gravity theories motivated by Plebanski s self-dual formulation of GR

A sky without qualities

Gravitational Waves. Basic theory and applications for core-collapse supernovae. Moritz Greif. 1. Nov Stockholm University 1 / 21

Recovery of anisotropic metrics from travel times

The existence of light-like homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous Lorentzian manifolds. Sao Paulo, 2013

Going with the flow: A study of Lagrangian derivatives

Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

Multi-disformal invariance of nonlinear primordial perturbations

A CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSVERSE SUBMANIFOLDS

A loop of SU(2) gauge fields on S 4 stable under the Yang-Mills flow

Symmetric Spaces Toolkit

Towards a manifestly diffeomorphism invariant Exact Renormalization Group

Choice of Riemannian Metrics for Rigid Body Kinematics

CHAPTER 3. Gauss map. In this chapter we will study the Gauss map of surfaces in R 3.

A Method of Successive Approximations in the Framework of the Geometrized Lagrange Formalism

Solving the Geodesic Equation

First structure equation

The Einstein field equations

Snyder noncommutative space-time from two-time physics

LECTURE 9: MOVING FRAMES IN THE NONHOMOGENOUS CASE: FRAME BUNDLES. 1. Introduction

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

Cosmology and Gravitational Bags via Metric-Independent Volume-Form Dynamics

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY CLASS NOTES INSTRUCTOR: F. MARQUES. September 25, 2015

EE731 Lecture Notes: Matrix Computations for Signal Processing

THE MAXWELL LAGRANGIAN IN PURELY AFFINE GRAVITY

LOCAL EXISTENCE THEORY OF THE VACUUM EINSTEIN EQUATIONS

Gravitational Renormalization in Large Extra Dimensions

arxiv:gr-qc/ v3 10 Nov 1994

Overthrows a basic assumption of classical physics - that lengths and time intervals are absolute quantities, i.e., the same for all observes.

Introduction to General Relativity

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

UV completion of the Standard Model

Constraints on Fluid Dynamics From Equilibrium Partition Func

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. Fall Last updated: November 26, (Under construction.)

Transcription:

Connections and geodesics in the space of metrics The exponential parametrization from a geometric perspective Andreas Nink Institute of Physics University of Mainz September 21, 2015 Based on: M. Demmel and A.N., arxiv:1506.03809

The exponential metric parametrization g µν = ḡ µρ ( e h ) ρ ν (ḡ µν : background metric, h µν = h νµ : symmetric tensor field) Use in literature Kawai et al. ( 1993): Perturbative QG in d = 2 + ǫ Eichhorn (2013 and 2015): Unimodular QG A.N. (2014): Single & bi-metric EH truncations Codello and D Odorico (2014): Scaling exponents and KPZ Percacci and Vacca (2015): Scalar tensor models Falls (2 2015): Gauge independent EA at one-loop Labus, Percacci and Vacca (2015): Scalar tensor models Ohta and Percacci (2015): Conformal gravity Ohta, Percacci and Vacca (2015): f (R) gravity Gies, Knorr and Lippoldt (2015): Analysis of parametrization dependence 2 / 38

The exponential metric parametrization g µν = ḡ µρ ( e h ) ρ ν (ḡ µν : background metric, h µν = h νµ : symmetric tensor field) Why is it used? Up to now: viewed as appropriate choice of coordinate system Easy separation of conformal factor trace of fluctuations h µν = ĥµν + 1 d ḡµνφ, easy volume element g = ḡ e 1 2 φ Avoid unphysical singularities in flow equations Reproduce central charge c = 25 3 / 38

Why do we care about parametrizations? Because ḡ µρ ( e h ) ρ ν is a metric h µν while ḡ µν + h µν is not! ḡ µρ ( e h ) ρ ν is symmetric and has the same signature as ḡ µν ḡ µν + h µν is symmetric, but can have wrong signature, in particular it can be degenerate (e.g. for h µν = ḡ µν ) Question: path integral Dh over valid metrics only? Exponential parametrization respects nonlinear structure of space of metrics, Dh involves only valid metrics Linear split (without further restrictions on h µν ): Dh captures degenerate metrics, too Exp linear not a reparametrization! No on-shell equivalence!? 4 / 38

Overview View h µν as tangent vector and exponential parametrization as geodesics in the space of metrics derive connection Show fundamental geometric origin of the connection Attention with Lorentzian signatures! Compare with Levi-Civita and Vilkovisky-DeWitt connection Covariance and geometric effective action 5 / 38

Derive connection in the space F of metrics Connection s.t. geodesics in F are parametrized by ḡ µρ ( e t h ) ρ ν Geodesic t g µν (t) with BC g µν (0) = ḡ µν and g µν (1) = g µν αβ ρσ g µν (t) + Γµν ġ αβ (t)ġ ρσ (t) = 0 ( ) In Taylor series g µν (t) = ( t n d n n=0 n! dt g n µν (t) ) t=0 replace all higher derivatives in terms of ġ µν (t) by eq. ( ) with h µν = ġ µν (0): g µν = g µν (t = 1) = ḡ µν + h µν 1 2 Γ αβ ρσ µν h αβ h ρσ + O(h 3 ) where Γ αβ ρσ αβ ρσ µν Γµν (ḡ) 6 / 38

Derive connection in the space F of metrics Compare this with direct expansion of g µν = ḡ µρ ( e h ) ρ ν g µν = ḡ µν + h µν + 1 2 h µρh ρ ν + O(h 3 ) = ḡ µν + h µν + 1 2 δ(α (µ ḡβ)(ρ δ σ) ν) h αβh ρσ + O(h 3 ) where indices embraced by round brackets are symmetrized. From 2nd order we read off (spacetime dependence restored): αβ ρσ Γµν (x, y, z) = δ (α (µ gβ)(ρ δ σ) ν) δ(x y)δ(x z) 7 / 38

Derive connection in the space F of metrics Yet to be proven: equality of expansions at all orders (1) Insert new connection Γαβ ρσ µν = δ (α (µ gβ)(ρ δ σ) ν) in geodesic equation: g µν g αρ ġ µα ġ ρν = 0 (2) Multiply with g νσ, rewrite derivatives: d dt (ġ µνg νσ ) = 0 ġ µν g νσ = const (3) This is a 1st order ODE: ġ µν (t) = c σ µ g σν (t) (4) Initial conditions: g µν (0) = ḡ µν and ġ µν (0) = c σ µ ḡ σν = h µν (5) Unique solution: matrix exponential g µν (t) = ḡ µρ ( e t h ) ρ ν (6) Setting t = 1 proves the equality 8 / 38

The fundamental geometric origin of the connection Pointwise character of geodesics (and Γαβ ρσ µν δ(x y)δ(x z)) Discussion reduces to 1 (arbitrary) spacetime point! Locally metrics are symmetric matrices of prescribed signature: M { A GL(d) } A T = A, A has signature (p, q) For now: Euclidean signature (symmetric positive definite matrices) Agenda Show that M is base space of some principal bundle Principal bundle induces canonical connection 9 / 38

Illustration of the bundle H O(d) G = GL(d) g o π : G M M G/H 10 / 38

Relation between G = GL(d) and M b 1 b 3 Fix metric, say η, by declaring some frame B = (b 1 b 2... b d ) to be orthonormal: η(b i, b j ) η µν (b i ) µ (b j ) ν = δ ij b 2 In matrix form: B T ηb = 1, B GL(d) η = (B 1 ) T 1 B 1 But: invariance under B BR 1 with R O(d) coset space structure M GL(d)/ O(d) 11 / 38

Group action and isotropy groups Define group action of G on M φ o M φ : G M M, (g, o) φ(g, o) (g 1 ) T og 1 Consider fixed but arbitrary base point ō M ( origin ) with isotropy group (stabilizer) H { h R d d } h T ōh = ō H is stabilizer since φ(h, ō) = ō h H M is homogeneous space (i.e. coset space G/H without origin) 12 / 38

G as a principal bundle G Define canonical projection π : G M, g π(g) (g 1 ) T ōg 1 (G, π, M, H) is principal bundle π g 1 g 2 g 3 π o 1 o 2 M Tangent spaces: given by Lie algebras g = R d d { h = A R d d } A T ō = ōa (vertical direction) 13 / 38

The canonical connection What is horizontal in tangent space? What about projections? Projections depend on both coordinate axes! G M?? Distinguished definition of horizontal direction m = { A R d d } A T ō = ōa m is vector space complement of h in g: g = m h Both m and h are invariant under Ad(H) Homogeneous space M is reductive By dπ m we can identify m TōM Canonical connection determined by H g dl g m 14 / 38

Computation of the canonical connection Metric on M: γ(x, Y ) tr(ō 1 X ō 1 Y ) + c 2 tr(ō 1 X) tr(ō 1 Y ) with X, Y TōM (symmetric matrices), c an arbitrary constant γ is G-invariant, i.e. the group action is isometric Canonical connection on (G, π, M, H) induces connection on tangent bundle TM G Ad(H) m (G m)/h given by the Levi-Civita connection on TM w.r.t. γ: Γ(X, Y ) = 1 ( 2 Xō 1 Y + Y ō 1 X ) Index notation, Γ αβ ρσ µν X αβ Y ρσ Γ(X, Y ), base point ō = ḡ µν : Γ αβ ρσ µν = δ (α (µ ḡβ)(ρ δ σ) ν) 15 / 38

Geodesics in M M inherits exponential map from G = GL(d) (matrix exponential) expō X = π (e ) dπ 1 e X for X TōM. Inserting the canonical projection π: o = expō X = ō eō 1 X In index notation with o = g µν, ō = ḡ µν and X = h µν : g µν = ḡ µρ ( e h ) ρ ν Geodesics in M, right signature by construction! 16 / 38

Interim conclusion M is homogeneous space, M G/H G has principal bundle structure G Natural way of defining the horizontal direction canonical connection Geodesics in M w.r.t. canonical connection parametrized by g µν = ḡ µρ ( e h ) ρ ν M G/H Exponential parametrization: adapted to basic structure of space of metrics 17 / 38

Two important terms for classifying M t t Geodesic completeness: Every maximal geodesic is defined on the entire real line R Geodesics stay in M and do not run into singularities Exponential map defined on entire tangent space Geodesic connectedness: Any two points in M can be connected by a geodesic Note: Connectedness plus geodesic completeness does not imply geodesic connectedness! 18 / 38

Example 1: flat plane R 2 Geodesically complete and geodesically connected 19 / 38

Example 1: flat plane R 2 Geodesically complete and geodesically connected 20 / 38

Example 2: half plane Not geodesically complete but geodesically connected 21 / 38

Example 2: half plane Not geodesically complete but geodesically connected 22 / 38

Example 3: punctured plane R\{0} Neither geodesically complete nor geodesically connected 23 / 38

Example 3: punctured plane R\{0} Neither geodesically complete nor geodesically connected 24 / 38

Example 4: punctured plane, non-flat connection Geodesically complete but not geodesically connected 25 / 38

Example 4: punctured plane, non-flat connection Geodesically complete but not geodesically connected 26 / 38

Properties of M for different signatures (p, q) For all signatures (p, q) the set M is open ( one chart sufficient) non-compact path-connected geodesically complete For Euclidean signatures (p arbitrary, q = 0) M is geodesically connected simply connected For Lorentzian signatures (p 1, q 1) M is not geodesically connected not simply connected 27 / 38

Illustration for 2 2-matrices Parametrize symmetric matrices ( M) by ( ) z x y y Eigenvalues given by z + x λ 1,2 = z ± x 2 + y 2 Euclidean: λ 1, λ 2 > 0 z > x 2 + y 2 Lorentzian: λ 1 > 0, λ 2 < 0 x 2 + y 2 < z < x 2 + y 2 28 / 38

Illustration for 2 2-matrices Parametrize symmetric matrices ( M) by ) ( z x y Euclidean y Eigenvalues given by z + x λ 1,2 = z ± x 2 + y 2 2 1 z 0 M (1,1) M (2,0) Euclidean: λ 1, λ 2 > 0 z > x 2 + y 2 Lorentzian: λ 1 > 0, λ 2 < 0 1 2 2 1 M (0,2) 0 1 x 2 1 0 y 1 2 2 x 2 + y 2 < z < x 2 + y 2 Lorentzian 29 / 38

Geodesics in M (1,1) (Lorentzian signature) 2 1 z 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 x 1 2 2 0 1 y 30 / 38

Geodesics in M (1,1) (Lorentzian signature) 2 1 z 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 x 1 2 2 0 1 y 31 / 38

Region in M (1,1) that can be reached by geodesics 2 1 z 0 Effective shielding 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 x 1 0 1 2 2 y Lorentzian case: exponential map neither surjective nor injective! 32 / 38

From M to F Recall: we had metric γ in M. In index notation: metric G in F? γ µν ρσ = g µ(ρ g σ)ν + c 2 gµν g ρσ Yes. With correct spacetime dependence and density weight: G µν ρσ (x, y) = g(x) γ µν ρσ (g(x))δ(x y) This is the DeWitt metric. It is the unique metric that is ultra-local and diagonal in x-space gauge invariant (diffeomorphisms are isometric) 33 / 38

Connections on M and F Proportionality factor g entails further field dependence Levi-Civita connection on F contains additional terms: Γ (LC) ( F = Γ (LC) M )(x) + T δ(x y)δ(x z) General connection on F : every smooth bi-linear bundle homomorphism A defines a connection by Γ F = Γ (LC) F + A Choosing A = T cancels contributions from g and reproduces Γ F = Γ (LC) M (x) δ(x y)δ(x z) = δ (α (µ gβ)(ρ (x) δ σ) ν) δ(x y)δ(x z) 34 / 38

Connections on M and F Another famous choice is A = A (VDW) (Vilkovisky-DeWitt) adapted to gauge bundle structure of F A (VDW) involves generators of gauge group highly non-local! Summary: Γ F = Γ (LC) F + A 0 LC A = A (VDW) VDW T new derived from metric adapted to gauge bundle structure adapted to geometric structure of M geodesics still calculable complicated nonlocal geodesics very simple geodesics! 35 / 38

Covariance in field space F Employ condensed DeWitt notation: i (µν, x) Consider a functional Γ of g and ḡ Γ[g, ḡ] Parametrize g in terms of h by a geodesic: g g[h; ḡ] Define Γ[h; ḡ] Γ [ g[h; ḡ], ḡ ] From geodesic equation follows δ n h=0 δh i 1 δh i n Γ[h; ḡ] = D (i1 D in) Γ[g, ḡ] g=ḡ Simple derivatives w.r.t. h are covariant derivatives in F! 36 / 38

Covariance in field space F Consequences With the exponential parametrization, Γ (2) k (appearing e.g. in the flow equation) is automatically covariant in field space: δ 2 [ḡ Γ k e ḡ 1h, ḡ ] δh i δh j = D (i D j) Γ k [g, ḡ] h=0 g=ḡ Geometric formalism (for any connection) suited for computing covariant objects Allows for construction of reparametrization invariant geometric effective action Modified Nielsen identities: relate δγ k /δḡ δγ k /δg 37 / 38

Summary & conclusion Fundamental geometric structure M GL(d)/ O(p, q) Principal bundle induces canonical connection ( Geodesics parametrized by g µν = ḡ µρ e h ) ρ ν Produces only valid metrics! Attention with Lorentzian signatures 38 / 38