March 18, 2014 Academic Year 2013/14

Similar documents
NAME (pinyin/italian)... MATRICULATION NUMBER... SIGNATURE

Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Modeling, Dynamics and Control III Spring 2002

Bogoliubov Transformation in Classical Mechanics

into a discrete time function. Recall that the table of Laplace/z-transforms is constructed by (i) selecting to get

Solutions. Digital Control Systems ( ) 120 minutes examination time + 15 minutes reading time at the beginning of the exam

ME 375 FINAL EXAM Wednesday, May 6, 2009

ME2142/ME2142E Feedback Control Systems

Given the following circuit with unknown initial capacitor voltage v(0): X(s) Immediately, we know that the transfer function H(s) is

Chapter 13. Root Locus Introduction

Feedback Control Systems (FCS)

Linear System Fundamentals

EE Control Systems LECTURE 6

MATH 251 Examination II April 6, 2015 FORM A. Name: Student Number: Section:

ME 375 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Friday December 17, 2004

CONTROL SYSTEMS. Chapter 5 : Root Locus Diagram. GATE Objective & Numerical Type Solutions. The transfer function of a closed loop system is

Question 1 Equivalent Circuits

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Lecture 8 - SISO Loop Design

Function and Impulse Response

SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY School of Engineering Science ENSC 320 Electric Circuits II. Solutions to Assignment 3 February 2005.

EE Control Systems LECTURE 14

1 Routh Array: 15 points

MM1: Basic Concept (I): System and its Variables

ME 375 EXAM #1 Tuesday February 21, 2006

Digital Control System

Figure 1 Siemens PSSE Web Site

Design of Digital Filters

Stability. ME 344/144L Prof. R.G. Longoria Dynamic Systems and Controls/Lab. Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin

CHAPTER 8 OBSERVER BASED REDUCED ORDER CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR LARGE SCALE LINEAR DISCRETE-TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS

The Root Locus Method

G(s) = 1 s by hand for! = 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 rad/sec.

MATEMATIK Datum: Tid: eftermiddag. A.Heintz Telefonvakt: Anders Martinsson Tel.:

Control Systems Engineering ( Chapter 7. Steady-State Errors ) Prof. Kwang-Chun Ho Tel: Fax:

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Root Locus Analysis

Sociology 376 Exam 1 Spring 2011 Prof Montgomery

Root Locus Diagram. Root loci: The portion of root locus when k assume positive values: that is 0

7.2 INVERSE TRANSFORMS AND TRANSFORMS OF DERIVATIVES 281

Analysis of Stability &

MAE140 Linear Circuits Fall 2012 Final, December 13th

Lecture 4. Chapter 11 Nise. Controller Design via Frequency Response. G. Hovland 2004

MA 266 FINAL EXAM INSTRUCTIONS May 2, 2005

Lecture 8. PID control. Industrial process control ( today) PID control. Insights about PID actions

Lecture #9 Continuous time filter

Homework #7 Solution. Solutions: ΔP L Δω. Fig. 1

Mathematical modeling of control systems. Laith Batarseh. Mathematical modeling of control systems

Chapter #4 EEE8013. Linear Controller Design and State Space Analysis. Design of control system in state space using Matlab

Lecture 21. The Lovasz splitting-off lemma Topics in Combinatorial Optimization April 29th, 2004

Chapter 7. Root Locus Analysis

What lies between Δx E, which represents the steam valve, and ΔP M, which is the mechanical power into the synchronous machine?

Chapter 4 Interconnection of LTI Systems

Control Systems Analysis and Design by the Root-Locus Method

Spring 2014 EE 445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Laboratory. Homework #0 Solutions on Review of Signals and Systems Material

376 CHAPTER 6. THE FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN METHOD. D(s) = we get the compensated system with :

Design By Emulation (Indirect Method)

Lecture 10 Filtering: Applied Concepts

A Constraint Propagation Algorithm for Determining the Stability Margin. The paper addresses the stability margin assessment for linear systems

Chapter 4. The Laplace Transform Method

The state variable description of an LTI system is given by 3 1O. Statement for Linked Answer Questions 3 and 4 :

Automatic Control Systems. Part III: Root Locus Technique

Stability Criterion Routh Hurwitz

Singular perturbation theory

Solutions to homework #10

5.5 Application of Frequency Response: Signal Filters

Problem Set 8 Solutions

MODERN CONTROL SYSTEMS

Homework 12 Solution - AME30315, Spring 2013

ECE 3510 Root Locus Design Examples. PI To eliminate steady-state error (for constant inputs) & perfect rejection of constant disturbances

Lecture 9: Shor s Algorithm

Correction for Simple System Example and Notes on Laplace Transforms / Deviation Variables ECHE 550 Fall 2002

S_LOOP: SINGLE-LOOP FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2004 Homework 4 Solution November 14,

11.2 Stability. A gain element is an active device. One potential problem with every active circuit is its stability

Chapter 5 Consistency, Zero Stability, and the Dahlquist Equivalence Theorem

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Social Studies 201 Notes for March 18, 2005

Lecture 17: Analytic Functions and Integrals (See Chapter 14 in Boas)

EE/ME/AE324: Dynamical Systems. Chapter 8: Transfer Function Analysis

Physics 741 Graduate Quantum Mechanics 1 Solutions to Final Exam, Fall 2014

What is automatic control all about? Welcome to Automatic Control III!! "Automatic control is the art of getting things to behave as you want.

( 1) EE 313 Linear Signals & Systems (Fall 2018) Solution Set for Homework #10 on Laplace Transforms

Chapter 2 Sampling and Quantization. In order to investigate sampling and quantization, the difference between analog

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Computers and Mathematics with Applications. Sharp algebraic periodicity conditions for linear higher order

CHAPTER 4 DESIGN OF STATE FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS AND STATE OBSERVERS USING REDUCED ORDER MODEL

online learning Unit Workbook 4 RLC Transients

Module 4: Time Response of discrete time systems Lecture Note 1

THE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL TWO-DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM SEMISTRONGLY STABILIZING CONTROLLERS. Tatsuya Hoshikawa, Kou Yamada and Yuko Tatsumi

Practice Problems - Week #7 Laplace - Step Functions, DE Solutions Solutions

An estimation approach for autotuning of event-based PI control systems

Notes on Phase Space Fall 2007, Physics 233B, Hitoshi Murayama

ROOT LOCUS. Poles and Zeros

SOME RESULTS ON INFINITE POWER TOWERS

Wolfgang Hofle. CERN CAS Darmstadt, October W. Hofle feedback systems

Linear Motion, Speed & Velocity

The Laplace Transform , Haynes Miller and Jeremy Orloff

Root Locus Contents. Root locus, sketching algorithm. Root locus, examples. Root locus, proofs. Root locus, control examples

These are practice problems for the final exam. You should attempt all of them, but turn in only the even-numbered problems!

Assessment of Performance for Single Loop Control Systems

Analysis and Design of a Third Order Phase-Lock Loop

Homework 7 Solution - AME 30315, Spring s 2 + 2s (s 2 + 2s + 4)(s + 20)

Transcription:

POLITONG - SHANGHAI BASIC AUTOMATIC CONTROL Exam grade March 8, 4 Academic Year 3/4 NAME (Pinyin/Italian)... STUDENT ID Ue only thee page (including the back) for anwer. Do not ue additional heet. Ue of any book, note, or other teaching material i not allowed. Write clearly and be explicit and concie in your anwer Subtitute [N] in the text with the number of letter of your firt (Pinyin/Italian) name EXERCISE Given the following dynamic ytem [N] x& x + u x& x y 5x 4x a) Claify it type. b) Compute it equilibrium tate when u [N] and determine their type and their tability. c) Compute the output at equilibrium. a) The ytem i continuou time, invariant, nonlinear, SISO, nd order. b) Setting the derivative to, we compute the unique equilibrium tate x x 4x y 5x + u x [ N]/ x ([ N]/ ) y 5x Which olve alo point c). /4 To determine the tability and type of the equilibrium, we have to linearize the ytem around the equilibrium condition f x x, u x 4 [ N] 4 x, u The matrix i triangular, o the eigenvalue can be immediately read on the main diagonal. They are - and -4. They are both real and negative, thu the equilibrium i aymptotically table and it i a nodal ink. March 8,4- POLITONG /4

EXERCISE Determine, a preciely a poible, the output y(t) of the feedback ytem in the figure when u (t)tep(t) and u (t)5tep(t). u + + u + + y [N] We firt compute the two tranfer function: Y ( ) G ( ) + U [ ] ( ) N + + [ N] + + Y( ) + G( ) U ( ) [ N] + + [ N] + + A expected, they have the ame firt order denominator. Then, we take into account the two input by applying to them the Laplace tranform: L[u (t)]/ and L[u (t)]5/. Thank to the uperimpoition principle, the overall output will be the um of the effect of the individual input. We can examine them eparately, or compute Y()G ()U ()+G ()U (). The numerator of Y() depend on [N], but the denominator i alway (+). So we can antitraform Y() by etting it equal to the um of two term A B Y ( ) + which mean that A ( + [ N] + ) + B mut be equal to the numerator of + [ N] + Y(). Thi provide two equation that allow to determine A and B and then a traightforward antitraformation. Auming, for intance, [N]3, [N]+7 and we obtain A, B4. The final reult i thu L - [A/]tep(t), or for t, and L - [B/(+7)]4 exp(-7t)tep(t), or 4e -7t for t and thu y(t) + 4e -4t for t. Such a concluion can be verified by uing the initial and final value theorem (the lat can be applied becaue the feedback ytem i aymptotically table, ince the pole of G and G i negative). Clearly, uing only the theorem intead of the analytical antitranformation, one obtain ome information on y(t), but not the complete behavior. March 8, 4 - POLITONG /4

EXERCISE 3 I the following control ytem aymptotically table for any value of K? Why? Determine at leat one value of K for which the ytem i aymptotically table and the bandpa i at leat [,[N]/]. U + - K ( + ) ( +.) Y You can ue the chart below, if ueful. db Auming K i a real number (a tf would have been written K()), the open-loop tf of the ytem i c K L( ) ( + ) ( +.) While the cloed loop tf i K ( + ) ( +.) F( ) K + ( + ) ( +.) We cannot analye the tability of F() by phae looking at the eigenvalue ince it ha a third order denominator, but we can apply Nyquit and Bode -9 theorem that allow u to -8 ay omething on the tability of F() by -7 conidering only L(). The firt quetion can be anwered by imply conidering the Nyquit plot. Since L() i 3 rd order without zeroe, the Nyquit plot (ee figure) will terminate ( ) with a phae -7, thu it will certainly cro the negative real axi and, for a ufficiently high gain K, it will pa below -. So there are (high) value of K for which F() become untable. Imaginary Axi 3 Nyquit Diagram To anwer the econd quetion, one may ue the Bode plot. The aymptotic value for K are hown, while the real one are in the following page. - - -3 - -5 5 5 5 3 35 4 Real Axi March 8, 4 - POLITONG 3/4

5 Bode Diagram Magnitude (db) -5 - -5 Phae (deg) -9-8 -7-3 Frequency (rad/ec) A a firt approximation, the Bode plot of F() i equal to (db) till c and coincide with L() for frequencie higher than c. So, looking at the aymptotic Bode plot, it i eay to undertand that, for K, the bandpa i about 3 and the ytem i aymptotically table (the condition of the Bode theorem apply and the critical phae i till higher than -8, which mean a poitive phae margin). To be afer, we can decreae K, thu decreaing the bandpa, but increaing tability. If [N]<, even K. will atify the requirement (the bandpa of F() would be _ and the phae margin cloe to 9 ). March 8, 4 - POLITONG 4/4

EXERCISE 4 Anwer the following quetion, uing only the available pace and WRITING CLEARLY, pleae. a) Two DISCRETE TIME ytem have the following tate tranition matrice. Which i more table? Why?.5 A [.8] [N]/ A For dicrete time ytem, we have to compute the magnitude ( abolute value real + imaginary ) of the eigenvalue. The farther they are from the tability limit i, the more table the ytem i. Thu, auming for intance [N]7, we obtain, -.5±.9j and o,.95 which mean the econd ytem i more table. b) Can a LTI continuou ytem with the following matrice be tabilized ( made aymptotically table) with a direct tate feedback u(t)kx(t)+v(t)?.5 A [ ] B [N] C We can compute the reachability matrix R[B AB], which in thi cae i quare. So, if det(r) the rank of Rorder of the ytem and thu the eigenvalue can be arbitrarily fixed with a direct tate feedback. By the way, the ytem wa already table. c) What i the gain margin of a feedback control ytem? The gain margin i an indicator of the robutne of the ytem to gain uncertainty. It i -/x A where xa L(j π ) and π i the frequency at which arg(l(j))-8. d) What are the main problem of uing an open-loop tructure to control a LTI ytem? With an open-loop controller, we cannot modify the tability of the ytem, we cannot reduce the effect of diturbance and, to make it feaible (at leat proper), we have to limit the bandpa. March 8, 4 - POLITONG 5/4