Oklahoma Earthquakes: Trends and Underlying Causes. Jeremy Boak, Oklahoma Geological Survey October 21, 2016

Similar documents
4D Integrated Study Using Geology, Geophysics, Reservoir Modeling & Rock Mechanics to Develop Assessment Models for Potential Induced Seismicity Risk

Earthquakes. Earthquake Magnitudes 10/1/2013. Environmental Geology Chapter 8 Earthquakes and Related Phenomena

Plotting Earthquake Epicenters*

Rall Walsh and Mark Zoback

I. Locations of Earthquakes. Announcements. Earthquakes Ch. 5. video Northridge, California earthquake, lecture on Chapter 5 Earthquakes!

8. Integrated Rock Mechanics Studies Technology Transfer Activities Gravimetric Determination of Basement Geologic Structure 41

Earthquakes Earth, 9th edition, Chapter 11 Key Concepts What is an earthquake? Earthquake focus and epicenter What is an earthquake?

Julie Shemeta, MEQ Geo Inc., WCEE Webinar 1/13/2016 1/14/2016

BAD VIBRATIONS (Earthquakes/Tsunamis)

What is an Earthquake?

Earthquakes and Earth s Interior

Earthquakes.

DATA MINING THE KNOWN UNKNOWNS OF OKLAHOMA S CLASS II UIC DATA TO IMPROVE INJECTION INDUCED SEISMICITY STUDIES

Recent Earthquakes in Oklahoma. and Potential for Induced Seismicity Austin Holland Oklahoma State Seismologist

Elastic rebound theory

Unraveling the Mysteries of Seismicity in Oklahoma. A Story Map

Earthquakes and Earthquake Hazards Earth - Chapter 11 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

How to Use This Presentation

Potential Injection-Induced Seismicity Associated With Oil & Gas Development

Part 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard. Earthquake Environment

Earthquakes. Building Earth s Surface, Part 2. Science 330 Summer What is an earthquake?

FAQs - Earthquakes Induced by Fluid Injection

An entire branch of Earth science, called, is devoted to the study of earthquakes.

Earthquake. What is it? Can we predict it?

Earthquakes!! Be sure to fill in your notes sheet as you go through the power point!

Once you have opened the website with the link provided choose a force: Earthquakes

Earthquakes.

Earthquakes & Volcanoes

What s Shaking in the Barnett Shale? STEP Dallas, August 11, 2015

Earthquakes in Ohio? Teacher Directions and Lesson

Earthquake Lab Introduction: Purpose: Method: Equipment needed: Fundamental Concepts and Key Terms:

Great earthquakes and new insights into subduction seismogenesis

Magnitude 7.9 SE of KODIAK, ALASKA

Aftershock From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

EARTHQUAKES. Bruce A. Bolt. Fifth Edition. W. H. Freeman and Company New York. University of California, Berkeley

1 of 5 12/10/2018, 2:38 PM

Earthquakes Chapter 19

New USGS Maps Identify Potential Ground- Shaking Hazards in 2017

Earthquakes How and Where Earthquakes Occur

Magnitude 7.8 SCOTIA SEA

Earthquakes and Faulting

The Size of an Earthquake. Intensity of Shaking (Robert Mallet, 1857) Calculation of Earthquake Magnitude (Charles Richter, 1935)

Dynamic Crust Regents Review

Module 7: Plate Tectonics and Earth's Structure Topic 4 Content : Earthquakes Presentation Notes. Earthquakes

Section Forces Within Earth. 8 th Grade Earth & Space Science - Class Notes

New Madrid and Central U.S. Region Earthquake Hazard

Earthquakes. Photo credit: USGS

Table One: Induced seismicity since 2011 in five previously aseismic Ohio counties. Locality County Year Induced Recorded Reference

Challenges and Strategies for Monitoring Induced Seismic Activity

Magnitude 6.3 SOUTH ISLAND OF NEW ZEALAND

Kansas Underground Injection Control Program & Induced Seismicity. By: Benjamin Busboom Stinson Leonard Street

I. What are Earthquakes?

Earthquakes and Earth s Chapter. Interior

GROUND-WATER LEVEL CHANGES IN U.S. AQUIFERS AS POTENTIAL TRIGGERS FOR EARTHQUAKES JUNE Jean Antonides

Section 19.1: Forces Within Earth Section 19.2: Seismic Waves and Earth s Interior Section 19.3: Measuring and Locating.

Magnitude 8.2 NORTHWEST OF IQUIQUE, CHILE

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

Earthquakes. Forces Within Eartth. Faults form when the forces acting on rock exceed the rock s strength.

The Earthquake of Padang, Sumatra of 30 September 2009 scientific information and update

EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS AT SLAC. This note summarizes some recently published information relevant

Earthquakes, an overview. Christa G. von Hillebrandt-Andrade Puerto Rico Seismic Network University of PR-Mayagüez

Earthquakes. Pt Reyes Station 1906

Released Science Inquiry Task Location Grade 11

Addressing the risks of induced seismicity in sub-surface energy operations

#13 Earthquake Prediction

Leveraging Cross-Disciplinary Science for Induced Seismicity Risk Management

Magnitude 7.6 HONDURAS

Magnitude 7.6 & 7.4 SOLOMON ISLANDS

Environmental Groups Warn Oklahoma Fracking Operators of Potential Legal Action

What We Know (and don t know)

Measuring EQ, Tsunamis

San Andreas Movie Can It Happen?

Earthquakes and Seismic Waves Lesson 4 2

Magnitude 7.6 & 7.6 PERU

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

Earthquakes. Earthquakes and Plate Tectonics. Earthquakes and Plate Tectonics. Chapter 6 Modern Earth Science. Modern Earth Science. Section 6.

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

Magnitude 6.9 GULF OF CALIFORNIA

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

Forces in Earth s Crust

Determining the Earthquake Epicenter: Japan

INTRODUCTION TO EARTHQUAKES

Induced Seismicity Risks

How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?

The San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth: Recent Site Characterization Studies and the 2.2-Km-Deep Pilot Hole

Measuring the Size of an Earthquake

Magnitude 6.5 OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Identifying the causes and effects of earthquakes

The Earthquake Cycle Chapter :: n/a

Science Starter. Describe in your own words what an Earthquake is and what causes it. Answer The MSL

Seismicity and the SWD-C4A well: An ongoing UIC case study in the Denver Basin, Colorado

Internal Layers of the Earth

Chapter 13 EARTHQUAKES AND EARTH STRUCTURE. FIGURE 13.1 The elastic rebound theory explains the earthquake cycle. [Photo by G. K. Gilbert/USGS.

Chapter 15. Earthquakes and Plate Tectonics. what s the connection? At the boundaries friction causes plates to stick together.

Seismic Hazard Abatement Program

Earthquakes. Chapter Test A. Multiple Choice. Write the letter of the correct answer on the line at the left.

Earthquakes Modified

Magnitude 7.6 SOUTH OF IQUIQUE, CHILE

Magnitude 7.2 OAXACA, MEXICO

Transcription:

Oklahoma Earthquakes: Trends and Underlying Causes Jeremy Boak, Oklahoma Geological Survey jboak@ou.edu October 21, 2016 1

The Oklahoma Geological Survey is a state agency for research and public service located on the Norman Campus of the University of Oklahoma and affiliated with the OU College of Earth and Energy. The Survey is chartered in the Oklahoma Constitution and is charged with investigating the state's land, water, mineral, and energy resources and disseminating the results of those investigations to promote the wise use of Oklahoma's natural resources consistent with sound environmental practices. We are not a regulatory authority 2

Acknowledgments OGS Staff Engaged on the Seismicity Issue Seismology: Jefferson Chang, Fernando Ferrer, Noorulann Ghouse, Junjun Hu, Andrew Thiel, Isaac Woelfel Hydrogeology, Geology, Geophysics: Kyle Murray, Richard Andrews, Kevin Crain, Steve Holloway, Jordan Williams Publications & Outreach: Ted Satterfield

OGS Uses about 40 Stations to Locate Oklahoma Earthquakes

Measuring an Earthquake Magnitude - a scaled estimate of energy released as seismic waves, proportional to rupture area Magnitude measured multiple ways (M L, m b, M w, M o, M s ) Magnitude estimates rarely the same between different methods All magnitude measures are uncertain Magnitude scales logarithmic (+1 unit of magnitude = ~10 times shaking & ~32 times the energy release) Earthquake Intensity is a qualitative estimate (using Modified Mercalli scale ranging from I-XII) 5

Earthquake Magnitude & Frequency Magnitude Earthquakes Energy Equivalents Richter Scale (logarithmic) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Largest recorded earthquakes Vast destruction Massive loss of life Great earthquake Severe impact Large loss of life Strong earthquake Damage in $Billions Some loss of life Moderate earthquake Property damage Light earthquake Some property damage Minor earthquake Felt by humans Injection induced earthquakes Typical <3.5 (Highest recorded = 5.6) Chile (1960) Alaska (1964) Sumatra (2004) Chile (2010) New Madrid (1812) San Francisco (1906) Charleston SC (1886) Haiti (2010) Loma Prieta (1989) Northridge (1994) Long Island (1884) <1 1 18 150 1,500 10,000 100,000 Krakatoa eruption Frequency of Occurrence Avg. per year (est.) World s largest nuclear test (USSR) Mount St Helens eruption Hiroshima atomic bomb Average Tornado Average tornado Large Lightning Bolt Large lightning bolt Oklahoma city bombing Moderate lightning bolt Magnitude 2.0 and below = typical micro-seismic events

Earthquakes 2009-2015 Alfalfa Grant Woods Noble Pawnee Garfield Payne Logan Lincoln Okfuskee Oklahoma Seminole 7

Earthquakes 2015-2016 Alfalfa Grant Woods Noble Pawnee Garfield Payne Logan Lincoln Okfuskee Oklahoma Seminole 8

Source: https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20161035

USGS 1-Year Projection Validated 10

Pawnee Earthquake (M5.8-76% of 2016 Seismic Energy) 11

Galena Township Fault 15% of 2016 Seismic Energy Oklahoma Geological Survey Dr. Jeremy Boak, Director 11 July 2016 M4+ aftershocks in Woods County Time: 2016 July 08 21:04:27.5 (CDT) Magnitude: 4.4 Mw Epicenter: 36.465, -98.756 Depth: 7.1 km Time: 2016 July 08 17:29:38.0 (CDT) Magnitude: 4.2 Mw 6 Epicenter: 36.475, -98.74 Depth: 6.4 km The recent M4.2, M4.2, and M4.4 that occurred on 2016 July 08 are considered aftershocks of the M5.1 earthquake that happened on 2016 Feb 13. This sequence brings the total of M4 or greater aftershocks on the Galena Township Fault Zone (GTFZ) up to eight. Empirical relations from global observations suggest that a few more aftershocks of M4+ are expected to occur on the GTFZ, as the crust adjusts to the displacement done by the M5.1 mainshock. Clustered aftershocks of similar magnitude are not uncommon in seismically active regions. The duration of aftershock sequences is typically longer in mid-continental settings than along plate boundaries. We derived three focal plane solutions (FPS or beachball diagrams) from each event that indicate strike-slip displacement dominated the motion along the fault. In case of further seismicity, we urge the public to protect themselves from falling objects: (1) drop to the ground; (2) cover your head and neck; and (3) hold on to any sturdy cover. Time: 2016 July 08 16:31:57.7 (CDT) Magnitude: 4.2 Mw Epicenter: 36.476, -98.739 Depth: 7.3 km 12

Earthquakes Occur in Basement, on Optimally Aligned Faults Number of Earthquakes 2000 1500 1000 500 2015 Earthquakes Ave. = 5.4±1. 6 Active Fault Orientations 2014 Maximum Horizontal Stress 0 0 2 4 6 8 1012 1416 Depth (km) OGS OF1-2015 13

Oklahoma M2.8+ Earthquakes Earthquakes per Day 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 M2.8+ Earthquakes 30 Day Mov. Avg. 180 Day Mov. Avg. 1 0 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17 14

Human Activity Can Induce Earthquakes Fluid Pressure increase from injection Figure modified from: http://www.earthmagazine.org/article/ground-shaking-research-howhumans-trigger-earthquakes 15

Underground Injection Control (UIC) Class II Injection Salt Water Disposal (SWD) Wells Murray 2014, OGS OF5-2015 16

Earthquake Activity Occurs Where Deep Injection Increases Substantially Source: Walsh, F. R., and Zoback, M. D. (2015) Oklahoma s recent earthquakes and saltwater disposal. Sci. Adv. 2015; 1:e1500195, 18 June 2015 17

Areas of Lower SWD Show Lower Earthquake Activity Source: Walsh, F. R., and Zoback, M. D. (2015) Oklahoma s recent earthquakes and saltwater disposal. Sci. Adv. 2015; 1:e1500195, 18 June 2015 18

SWD Includes Very Little Flowback Water from Hydraulic Fracturing Source: Walsh, F. R., and Zoback, M. D. (2015) Oklahoma s recent earth-quakes and saltwater disposal. Sci. Adv. 2015; 1:e1500195, 18 June 2015 19

6.000 5.000 Earthquakes per Day 4.000 3.000 2.000 Earthquakes, Oil and Water M2.8+ Earthquakes 684 Arbuckle Well Injection Oklahoma Oil Production 6 Month Moving Average 3 2 1 Daily Injection/Production (Millions of barrels) 1.000 0.000 0 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17 20

Earthquake Year-to-Year Comparison 1000 900 800 10/05/2016 2015 2014 903 250 200 10/05/16 2014 2015 220 M3.0+ Earthquakes 700 600 500 400 300 526 579 M3.5+ Earthquakes 150 100 148 101 200 50 100 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D J 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D J 21

Simplified Regional Grouping Northwest Grant Alfalfa Northwest North Central Woods Noble Pawnee Garfield Payne Logan Central Lincoln Okfuskee Oklahoma Seminole South 22

Three Large Quakes Dominate Energy Release 1,000,000 Seismic Moment by Region Seismic Moment (Trillion N-m) 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 M5.0+ Rest of OK North Central Northwest Central South 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 23

Earthquake Forecasting Probability of one or more earthquakes of magnitude (m) over the specified time Not a prediction, but a forecast Shorter the period, the more uncertain the estimate August 2016 Magnitude (M L ) Duration 3.0 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 4 Year 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.28 0.06 1 Year 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.24 0.06 6 months 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.59 0.19 0.05 30 days 1.00 0.76 0.25 0.06 0.01 0.002 10 days 1.00 0.35 0.08 0.02 0.003 0.001 Probabilities are expressed as values from 0 to 1. To transform probabilities to percent, multiply by 100.

Earthquake Forecasting Probability of one or more earthquakes of magnitude (m) over the specified time Not a prediction, but a forecast Shorter the period, the more uncertain the estimate October 10, 2016 Magnitude (M L ) Duration 3.0 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 4 Year 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.35 0.08 1 Year 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.26 0.06 6 months 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.41 0.11 0.02 30 days 1.00 0.65 0.19 0.04 0.01 0.002 10 days 1.00 0.37 0.09 0.02 0.004 0.001 Probabilities are expressed as values from 0 to 1. To transform probabilities to percent, multiply by 100.

Summary: Induced Seismicity in Oklahoma No documented case of induced seismicity comes close to the current earthquake rates or the area over which the earthquakes are occurring in Oklahoma The OGS considers it very likely that the majority of recent earthquakes, particularly those in central and north-central Oklahoma, are triggered by the injection of produced water in SWD wells. Hydraulic fracturing flowback water only contributes a small amount to the SWD apparently responsible for the observed rate of earthquakes The drop in earthquake frequency over the past year likely results from decreases in injection in the Area of Interest driven both by oil price and by Corporation Commission actions

Backup Material 27

Seismic Activity Shifts Regionally Through Time 900,000 Seismic Moment by Region Seismic Moment (Trillion N-m) 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 Rest of OK North Central Northwest Central South 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 28

Cumulative Seismic Moment (Energy) by Year 1,000,000 Cumulative Seismic Moment (Trillion N-m) 100,000 10,000 1,000 100 10 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 J F M A M J J A S O N D J 29

Oklahoma Earthquakes 2009-2016 100000 Cumulative Frequency 10000 1000 100 10 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Magnitude 30

Pattern of Larger Earthquakes 36 Lincoln County Earthquakes 37.2 Galena Township Fault Woods & Major 35.8 37 Galena Twp Fault 36.8 Latitude 35.6 35.4 Wellston Prague Lincoln 35.2-97.2-97 -96.8-96.6 Longitude Latitude 36.6 36.4 36.2 36-99 -98.8-98.6-98.4-98.2-98 Longitude 31

Lincoln County Earthquakes Cumulative Frequency 100000 10000 1000 100 Lincoln Prague Wellston 10 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Magnitude 32

Woods and Major County Earthquakes Cumulative Frequency 100000 10000 1000 100 10 Woods & Major Galena Twp Fault 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Magnitude (M L ) 33

Most Earthquakes Occurring in ~16% of the Area of the State Alfalfa Grant Woods Noble Pawnee Garfield Payne Logan Lincoln Oklahoma 34

Earthquake Capital of the U. S.? 10000 Oklahoma 2015 Cumulative Frequency 1000 100 10 Oklahoma 2014 Oklahoma 2011 California 2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 Magnitude 35

USGS 1% Hazard Map 36

Sources of Injection-Induced Seismicity 1. Produced-water disposal Water produced in conjunction with oil Typically, for every 1 bbl of oil, 5-10 bbl of water are produced (global est.) Water is salty and normally not useful Injection is optimal method for salt water disposal Re-use is becoming more attractive and popular especially in hydraulic fracturing 2. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) wells Rarely causes earthquakes because normally as much fluid is extracted as is injected but a few cases identified. PRODUCED-OIL vs WATER 5-10 1 Barrels Produced ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY WELLS Equal Amounts of Fluid In & Out