Form Factor Fit for e + e π + π π + π

Similar documents
Experimental Study of ρ π 0 π 0 γ and ω π 0 π 0 γ Decays

ISR physics at BABAR

Strong and electromagnetic J/ψ and ψ(2s) decays into pion and kaon pairs *

V cb. Determination of. and related results from BABAR. Masahiro Morii, Harvard University on behalf of the BABAR Collaboration

Low mass dileptons from Pb + Au collisions at 158 A GeV

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 1 Feb 2000

The Radiative Return at Φ- and B-Meson Factories

Jefferson Lab, May 23, 2007

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 30 Oct 2002

Determination of the scalar glueball mass in QCD sum rules

Dilepton Production from Coarse-grained Transport Dynamics

The Radiative Return at Φ- and B-Meson Factories

HADRONIC CROSS SECTION MEASUREMENTS AT SND

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 9 Jan 2007

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 16 Jun 2004

Recent Results on J/ψ, ψ and ψ Decays from BESII

Tetraquark interpretation of e + e ϒπ + π Belle data and e + e b b BaBar data

BABAR Results on Hadronic Cross Sections with Initial State Radiation (ISR)

CharmSpectroscopy from B factories

Spectroscopy and Decay properties of D and D s mesons with Martin-like confinement potential in Dirac formalism

Overview and Status of Measurements of F 3π at COMPASS

Physik Department, Technische Universität München D Garching, Germany. Abstract

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 11 May 2000

Babar anomaly and the pion form factors

Review of ISR physics at BABAR

Pion Form Factor Measurement at BESIII

Rho Resonance Parameters from Lattice QCD

Vector meson dominance, axial anomaly and mixing

Axial anomaly, vector meson dominance and mixing

Study of e + e annihilation to hadrons at low energies at BABAR

Novosibirsk hadronic currents for τ 4π channels of τ decay library TAUOLA

Effective field theory estimates of the hadronic contribution to g 2

Dalitz Plot Analyses of B D + π π, B + π + π π + and D + s π+ π π + at BABAR

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 12 Mar 1998

Recent Progress on Charmonium Decays at BESIII

Low lying axial-vector mesons as dynamically generated resonances

arxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 30 Oct 2018

Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering and Muon g 2: Dispersive Approach

Cracking the Unitarity Triangle

Adrian Bevan Department of Physics Liverpool University Liverpool, United Kingdom (from the BABAR Collaboration.)

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 25 Feb 2002

Study of the process e + e π + π π + π π 0 with CMD-2 detector

arxiv: v3 [hep-ex] 11 Feb 2013

Recent results from SND detector

BABAR Status & Physics Reach in Coming Years

A meson-exchange model for π N scattering up to energies s. Shin Nan Yang National Taiwan University

e + e hadrons via ISR: light quarks spectroscopy

Rho-rho production in two-photon collisions

Nicolas Berger SLAC, Menlo Park, California, U.S.A.

arxiv:hep-ph/ v4 18 Nov 1999

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 22 Dec 2000

Charmonium and -like states from Belle

Measuring the phase between strong and EM J/ψ decay amplitudes HADRON 2011

Regge phenomenology forπ 0,η, andη photoproduction

KLOE results on Scalar Mesons (II)

Study of the Electromagnetic Dalitz decay of J/ψ e + e - π 0

B decays to charm states at BABAR.

Results from BES: cc Decays

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 20 Oct 2011

The light Scalar Mesons: σ and κ

Sébastien Descotes-Genon

PoS(EPS-HEP 2009)057. Bottomonium Studies at BaBar. Veronique Ziegler. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 22 Jul 2000

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 10 Nov 2000

Measurements of e + e hadrons at VEPP-2M

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 7 Aug 2000

R value Measurement with BESII and BESIII

The hadronic vacuum polarisation contribution to the muon g 2

Charmonium(-like) and Bottomonium(-like) States Results from Belle and BaBar

Measurements of. Jiangchuan Chen. (for BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing , P.R. China

Charmonium decays at the BESIII experiment

ub + V cd V tb = 0, (1) cb + V td V

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 5 Sep 2006

V cb : experimental and theoretical highlights. Marina Artuso Syracuse University

Popat Patel (McGill University) On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration The Lomonosov XIV Conference Moscow (2009/08/24)

e e with ISR and the Rb Scan at BaBar

Hadronic decays of the omega meson measured with WASA-at-COSY

Hiroyuki Sagawa KEK OHO 1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 5 May 2003

! gluonic content from V"P! and J/"" VP decays

Implications of G p E(Q 2 )/G p M(Q 2 ).

Particle Physics with Electronic Detectors

Study of the ISR reactions at BaBar!

Centrifugal Barrier Effects and Determination of Interaction Radius

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 16 Oct 2016

Recent results on CKM/CPV from Belle

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 24 Oct 2005

Light Meson Decays at BESIII

Review of Standard Tau Decays from B Factories

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 30 Oct 2002

Stephane Ghozzi and Fred Jegerlehner Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron Platanenallee 6, D Zeuthen, Germany. Abstract

new measurements of sin(2) & cos(2) at BaBar

A Theoretical View on Dilepton Production

arxiv: v2 [hep-ex] 8 Aug 2013

Andreas Nyffeler. Chiral Dynamics 2012, August 6-10, 2012 Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA, USA

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 30 Jun 2006

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 7 Jul 2015

Scalar mesons at KLOE

New Physics search in penguin B-decays

Transcription:

Form Factor Fit for e + e π + π π + π Y. Weng H. Hu Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing 00049 China arxiv:hep-ex/0505v3 4 Jul 006 February 7 008 Abstract The cross section of e + e π + π π + π has been measured by BABAR collaboration. We apply the theoretical cross section deduced from the extended VMD (Vector Meson Dominance) model to fit these experimental data. The relevant parameters and the isovector form factor are obtained. Introduction Since 988 ρ(600) was replaced by two new resonances: ρ(450) and ρ(700) in PDG. It is suggested that this possibility can be explained by a theoretical analysis on the consistency of π and 4π electromagnetic form factors. Furthermore detailed experimental data on the cross section of e + e π + π π + π make possible the accurate determination of the parameters of ρ-meson and its radial recurrencies. Therefore it is meaningful to fit these parameters simultaneously and compare current theoretical model with the experimental data. Recently VMD model has been developed which not only includes the contribution of the lowest-lying vector-mesons but also includes those of their high-mass recurrencies [][]. The experimental results of the cross section of e + e π + π π + π can be used to demonstrate the above theoretical model. This paper aims to adopt the cross section of e + e π + π π + π derived from the extended VMD model to fit the experimental data from BABAR collaboration. e-mail:wengy@ihep.ac.cn

Expression of the cross section The cross section of e + e π + π π + π can be described generally in terms of the extended VMD model[] which takes into account the mixing of the resonances ρ(770) ρ ρ in the frame work of the field theory-inspired approach based on the summation of the loop corrections to the propagators of the unmixed states. The cross section can be written as follows [][] σ(s) = (4πα) F s 3/ ρ 0 π + π (s) W π + π π + π (s) () in which s is the total center-of-mass energy squared α /37 is the fine structure factor and W π + π π + π is the final state factor. According to the vector current conservation the relation 0 ρ 0 π + π = gρππ [] can be considered as a guide for the corresponding coupling constant. So the expression of the isovector form factor can be written as ( ) F ρ 0 π + π (s) = G (s) m ρ f ρ m ρ f ρ gρ 0 ππ ρ0 π + π ρ0 π + π + in which the leptonic coupling constants f ρi is The matrix of inverse propagators is G(s) = m ρ f ρ () Γ ρi e + e = 4πα 3f ρ i m ρi. (3) D ρ Π ρρ Π ρρ Π ρρ D ρ Π ρ ρ Π ρρ Π ρ ρ D ρ. (4) It consists of the inverse propagators of the unmixed states ρ i = ρ(770) ρ and ρ D ρi D ρi (s) = m ρ i s i sγ ρi (s) (5) where Γ ρi (s) = g ρ i ππ 6πs q3 ππ + g ρ i ωπ π (q3 ωπ + q3 K K + 3 q3 ρη ) + 3 g ρ i ρ 0 π + π W π + π π + π (s) + gρ i ρ + ρ W π + π π 0 π0(s) (6)

and the nondiagonal polarization operators Π ρi ρ j = ReΠ ρi ρ j + iimπ ρi ρ j. The real parts are still unknown and may be supposed to be some constants at the same time the imaginary parts could be deduced from the unitarity relatoin as ImΠ ρi ρ j = s[ i ππj ππ qππ 3 6πs + i ωπ π (q3 ωπ + q3 K K + 3 q3 ρη ) + 3 i ρ 0 π + π j ρ 0 π + π W π + π π + π (s) + i ρ + ρ j ρ + ρ W π + π π 0 π0(s)]. (7) 3 The procedure of form factor fit The cross section of e + e π + π π + π has been studied and measured by many experiments. BABAR collaboration has measured this cross section in the center-of-mass energies from 0.6 to 4.5 GeV considering a hard photo radiated from the initial state. Because of the wide energy range and the relatively small errors we use the expression described in Eq.() to fit the undressed (without vacuum polarization) cross sections [3]. The fit is carried out through minimum χ-square n χ (α) = ( σ i σ the (x i α) ) (8) i= σ i where σ i is the experimental cross section; σ the (x i α) is the corresponding theoretical expressions; α is the vector of free parameters which are required to be fitted; and σ i is the measurement error of the individual cross section. Then Minuit package [4] has been chosen as the tool to find the minimum value of the multi-parameter function Eq.(8) and analyzes the shape of this function around the minimum. The Minuit processor MIGRAD which is considered to be the best minimizer for nearly all functions is used to perform the fit. The fit results are successful for describing the shape of the cross section and the form factor of e + e π + π π + π. A good minimum has already been found and the parameter errors taking into account the parameter correlations have been calculated. But it seems difficult to use MINOS another Minuit processor to calculate the the errors taking into account both parameter correlations and non-linearities. As we know Eq.() consists of an integral through three dimensions (taking into account initial state radiative correction) and fit for χ is sensitive to some parameters. As 3

a result the possibility of calculating the parameter errors by MINOS is reduced by these effects. The fit parameters are m ρi i π + π i ρ 0 π + π i ρ + ρ f ρ i ReΠ ρi ρ j. The mass of ρ i have been measured relatively well so in the fit they are fixed to the values in the PDG [5]: m ρ0 = 0.7758GeV m ρ =.465GeV m ρ =.70GeV. Meanwhile according to the analysis in [] the real parts of nondiagonal polarization operators ReΠ ρρ and ReΠ ρρ are set to zero. The parameter 0 ωπ has been obtained from the measurement of e + e ωπ and its value is fixed to 4.3 [7]. The physical strong coupling constant 0 ρ + ρ is set to 6.05 according to [6]. f ρ0 is calculated from Eq.(3) and it is fixed to 5.. Considering 0 ρ 0 π + π = g ρππ and 0 ρ + ρ = 0 π + π [] we set 0 ρ 0 π + π and 0 ρ + ρ to be 73.05 and 6.05 respectively. 4 The fit results and the discussion The values of the parameters and their errors in the fit are presented in Table. The cross section and the form factor of e + e π + π π + π measured by BABAR and the curves predicted by the extended VMD model are shown in Figure and. Compared with the preceding work by N.N.ACHASOV who used diverse experimental data from different channels to carry out the fit respectively our work focuses on the possibility to fit the parameters simultaneously. We have tried many groups of initial input values and obtained lots of agreeable results. The final values in the Table are the most proper one in our work because most values of the parameters are in the limit range in []. Meanwhile the χ /n d.o.f is near. However there are some differences between the values from our work and those from the previous work. In Figure the dash line only takes into account the contribution of ρ(770). The VMD model estimate in this case is [] F ρ0 π + π (s) = ππm ρ m ρ s. (9) The fitted lines agree with the experimental data relatively well above 0.98Gev. 5 Conclusion From the fit values and errors of the parameters are obtained. Furthermore the isovector form factor is also similar to the previous work. Considering that some parameters may have a strong correlation and fit for χ 4

σe + e π + π π + π (nb) 30 5 0 5 0 5 BaBar 0.5.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Ecm (GeV) Figure : The energy dependence of the e + e π + π π + π cross section obtained from BABAR data in comparison with that from the result of fitting. Total errors are shown. Fρ 0 π + π 8 0 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 BaBar pure VDM 3 0 0 0-0 - 0.5.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Ecm (GeV) Figure : The ρπ + π form factor squared. The data are recalculated from the cross section data of BABAR. 5

Table : The values of the parameters are resulted from fitting with data BABAR. Parameter BABAR m ρ 0(GeV) 0.7758 m (GeV) ῤ.4650 m (GeV).700 ῤ f ρ 0 5. f ρ 0.44±0.053 f ρ 0.333±0.003 0 π + π 6.05 0 ωπ 4.3 0 ρ 0 π + π 73.05 0 ρ + ρ 6.05 π+ π -3.754±.078 ωπ -4.58±.57 ρ0 π + π 9.69±4.85 ρ+ ρ -4.454±0.803 π+ π 9.4±.77 ωπ 9.998±.565 ρ0 π + π -40.53±5.78 ρ+ ρ -0.50±.67 ReΠ ρρ 0 ReΠ ρρ 0 ReΠ ρ -6.070±0.385 ρ χ /n d.o.f 3.89/30 is sensitive to some parameters the results of our work may differ from those which are gained by respectively fitting different experimental data from different channels. References [] N.N.Achasov and A.A.Kozhevnikov Phys.Rev. D55. 663(997). [] N.N.Achasov and A.A.Kozhevnikov hep-ph/990436. [3] BABAR Collaboration B.Aubert et al. Phys. Rev. D7. 0500(005). 6

[4] CERN Program Library entry D506 [5] Particle Data Group Phys.Rev (004) [6] Hai-Yang Cheng et al Phys.Rev. D7. 04030(005) [7] S.I.Dolinsky et.al. Phys. Rep. 0 99(99) 7

Form Factor Fit for e + e π + π π + π Y. Weng H. Hu Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing 00049 China arxiv:hep-ex/0505v3 4 Jul 006 February 7 008 Abstract The cross section of e + e π + π π + π has been measured by BABAR collaboration. We apply the theoretical cross section deduced from the extended VMD (Vector Meson Dominance) model to fit these experimental data. The relevant parameters and the isovector form factor are obtained. Introduction Since 988 ρ(600) was replaced by two new resonances: ρ(450) and ρ(700) in PDG. It is suggested that this possibility can be explained by a theoretical analysis on the consistency of π and 4π electromagnetic form factors. Furthermore detailed experimental data on the cross section of e + e π + π π + π make possible the accurate determination of the parameters of ρ-meson and its radial recurrencies. Therefore it is meaningful to fit these parameters simultaneously and compare current theoretical model with the experimental data. Recently VMD model has been developed which not only includes the contribution of the lowest-lying vector-mesons but also includes those of their high-mass recurrencies [][]. The experimental results of the cross section of e + e π + π π + π can be used to demonstrate the above theoretical model. This paper aims to adopt the cross section of e + e π + π π + π derived from the extended VMD model to fit the experimental data from BABAR collaboration. e-mail:wengy@ihep.ac.cn

Expression of the cross section The cross section of e + e π + π π + π can be described generally in terms of the extended VMD model[] which takes into account the mixing of the resonances ρ(770) ρ ρ in the frame work of the field theory-inspired approach based on the summation of the loop corrections to the propagators of the unmixed states. The cross section can be written as follows [][] σ(s) = (4πα) F s 3/ ρ 0 π + π (s) W π + π π + π (s) () in which s is the total center-of-mass energy squared α /37 is the fine structure factor and W π + π π + π is the final state factor. According to the vector current conservation the relation 0 ρ 0 π + π = gρππ [] can be considered as a guide for the corresponding coupling constant. So the expression of the isovector form factor can be written as ( ) F ρ 0 π + π (s) = G (s) m ρ f ρ m ρ f ρ gρ 0 ππ ρ0 π + π ρ0 π + π + in which the leptonic coupling constants f ρi is The matrix of inverse propagators is G(s) = m ρ f ρ () Γ ρi e + e = 4πα 3f ρ i m ρi. (3) D ρ Π ρρ Π ρρ Π ρρ D ρ Π ρ ρ Π ρρ Π ρ ρ D ρ. (4) It consists of the inverse propagators of the unmixed states ρ i = ρ(770) ρ and ρ D ρi D ρi (s) = m ρ i s i sγ ρi (s) (5) where Γ ρi (s) = g ρ i ππ 6πs q3 ππ + g ρ i ωπ π (q3 ωπ + q3 K K + 3 q3 ρη ) + 3 g ρ i ρ 0 π + π W π + π π + π (s) + gρ i ρ + ρ W π + π π 0 π0(s) (6)

and the nondiagonal polarization operators Π ρi ρ j = ReΠ ρi ρ j + iimπ ρi ρ j. The real parts are still unknown and may be supposed to be some constants at the same time the imaginary parts could be deduced from the unitarity relatoin as ImΠ ρi ρ j = s[ i ππj ππ qππ 3 6πs + i ωπ π (q3 ωπ + q3 K K + 3 q3 ρη ) + 3 i ρ 0 π + π j ρ 0 π + π W π + π π + π (s) + i ρ + ρ j ρ + ρ W π + π π 0 π0(s)]. (7) 3 The procedure of form factor fit The cross section of e + e π + π π + π has been studied and measured by many experiments. BABAR collaboration has measured this cross section in the center-of-mass energies from 0.6 to 4.5 GeV considering a hard photo radiated from the initial state. Because of the wide energy range and the relatively small errors we use the expression described in Eq.() to fit the undressed (without vacuum polarization) cross sections [3]. The fit is carried out through minimum χ-square n χ (α) = ( σ i σ the (x i α) ) (8) i= σ i where σ i is the experimental cross section; σ the (x i α) is the corresponding theoretical expressions; α is the vector of free parameters which are required to be fitted; and σ i is the measurement error of the individual cross section. Then Minuit package [4] has been chosen as the tool to find the minimum value of the multi-parameter function Eq.(8) and analyzes the shape of this function around the minimum. The Minuit processor MIGRAD which is considered to be the best minimizer for nearly all functions is used to perform the fit. The fit results are successful for describing the shape of the cross section and the form factor of e + e π + π π + π. A good minimum has already been found and the parameter errors taking into account the parameter correlations have been calculated. But it seems difficult to use MINOS another Minuit processor to calculate the the errors taking into account both parameter correlations and non-linearities. As we know Eq.() consists of an integral through three dimensions (taking into account initial state radiative correction) and fit for χ is sensitive to some parameters. As 3

a result the possibility of calculating the parameter errors by MINOS is reduced by these effects. The fit parameters are m ρi i π + π i ρ 0 π + π i ρ + ρ f ρ i ReΠ ρi ρ j. The mass of ρ i have been measured relatively well so in the fit they are fixed to the values in the PDG [5]: m ρ0 = 0.7758GeV m ρ =.465GeV m ρ =.70GeV. Meanwhile according to the analysis in [] the real parts of nondiagonal polarization operators ReΠ ρρ and ReΠ ρρ are set to zero. The parameter 0 ωπ has been obtained from the measurement of e + e ωπ and its value is fixed to 4.3 [7]. The physical strong coupling constant 0 ρ + ρ is set to 6.05 according to [6]. f ρ0 is calculated from Eq.(3) and it is fixed to 5.. Considering 0 ρ 0 π + π = g ρππ and 0 ρ + ρ = 0 π + π [] we set 0 ρ 0 π + π and 0 ρ + ρ to be 73.05 and 6.05 respectively. 4 The fit results and the discussion The values of the parameters and their errors in the fit are presented in Table. The cross section and the form factor of e + e π + π π + π measured by BABAR and the curves predicted by the extended VMD model are shown in Figure and. Compared with the preceding work by N.N.ACHASOV who used diverse experimental data from different channels to carry out the fit respectively our work focuses on the possibility to fit the parameters simultaneously. We have tried many groups of initial input values and obtained lots of agreeable results. The final values in the Table are the most proper one in our work because most values of the parameters are in the limit range in []. Meanwhile the χ /n d.o.f is near. However there are some differences between the values from our work and those from the previous work. In Figure the dash line only takes into account the contribution of ρ(770). The VMD model estimate in this case is [] F ρ0 π + π (s) = ππm ρ m ρ s. (9) The fitted lines agree with the experimental data relatively well above 0.98Gev. 5 Conclusion From the fit values and errors of the parameters are obtained. Furthermore the isovector form factor is also similar to the previous work. Considering that some parameters may have a strong correlation and fit for χ 4

σe + e π + π π + π (nb) 30 5 0 5 0 5 BaBar 0.5.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Ecm (GeV) Figure : The energy dependence of the e + e π + π π + π cross section obtained from BABAR data in comparison with that from the result of fitting. Total errors are shown. Fρ 0 π + π 8 0 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 BaBar pure VDM 3 0 0 0-0 - 0.5.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Ecm (GeV) Figure : The ρπ + π form factor squared. The data are recalculated from the cross section data of BABAR. 5

Table : The values of the parameters are resulted from fitting with data BABAR. Parameter BABAR m ρ 0(GeV) 0.7758 m (GeV) ῤ.4650 m (GeV).700 ῤ f ρ 0 5. f ρ 0.44±0.053 f ρ 0.333±0.003 0 π + π 6.05 0 ωπ 4.3 0 ρ 0 π + π 73.05 0 ρ + ρ 6.05 π+ π -3.754±.078 ωπ -4.58±.57 ρ0 π + π 9.69±4.85 ρ+ ρ -4.454±0.803 π+ π 9.4±.77 ωπ 9.998±.565 ρ0 π + π -40.53±5.78 ρ+ ρ -0.50±.67 ReΠ ρρ 0 ReΠ ρρ 0 ReΠ ρ -6.070±0.385 ρ χ /n d.o.f 3.89/30 is sensitive to some parameters the results of our work may differ from those which are gained by respectively fitting different experimental data from different channels. References [] N.N.Achasov and A.A.Kozhevnikov Phys.Rev. D55. 663(997). [] N.N.Achasov and A.A.Kozhevnikov hep-ph/990436. [3] BABAR Collaboration B.Aubert et al. Phys. Rev. D7. 0500(005). 6

[4] CERN Program Library entry D506 [5] Particle Data Group Phys.Rev (004) [6] Hai-Yang Cheng et al Phys.Rev. D7. 04030(005) [7] S.I.Dolinsky et.al. Phys. Rep. 0 99(99) 7