Michigan Results. For 9/21/2012-9/22/2012. Contact: Doug Kaplan,

Similar documents
45.6% 2.5% Likely Obama

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE JUNE WAVE 1

CSSS/STAT/SOC 321 Case-Based Social Statistics I. Levels of Measurement

Module 4 Practice problem and Homework answers

BIOS 625 Fall 2015 Homework Set 3 Solutions

Rama Nada. -Ensherah Mokheemer. 1 P a g e

Ecological inference with distribution regression

Definition. A matrix is a rectangular array of numbers enclosed by brackets (plural: matrices).

Introduction to Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 7: The Chi-Square Distribution

NOWCASTING THE OBAMA VOTE: PROXY MODELS FOR 2012

Chapter 18: Sampling Distributions

(c) Interpret the estimated effect of temperature on the odds of thermal distress.

Appendix A: Topline questionnaire

Date: Wed 12 July 2017 Reference Number: FOI Category: Stats - Crime

Marketing Research Session 10 Hypothesis Testing with Simple Random samples (Chapter 12)

15: CHI SQUARED TESTS

Math 138 Summer Section 412- Unit Test 1 Green Form, page 1 of 7

Energy and U.S. Consumers

Tables and Figures to Accompany

MA : Introductory Probability

The Causal Inference Problem and the Rubin Causal Model

Research Methods in Political Science I

How to Use the Internet for Election Surveys

Introduction to Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 4: Sampling

ASSOCIATED PRESS-WEATHER UNDERGROUND WEATHER SURVEY CONDUCTED BY KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS January 28, 2011

Inferences About Two Proportions

Sociology Exam 2 Answer Key March 30, 2012

STA 303 H1S / 1002 HS Winter 2011 Test March 7, ab 1cde 2abcde 2fghij 3

13.1 Categorical Data and the Multinomial Experiment

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Equality and Diversity Workforce Monitoring Report

Polling and sampling. Clement de Chaisemartin and Douglas G. Steigerwald UCSB

ON A CONJECTURE OF WILLIAM HERSCHEL

Linear Algebra Application~ Markov Chains MATH 224

1. Capitalize all surnames and attempt to match with Census list. 3. Split double-barreled names apart, and attempt to match first half of name.

and the Sample Mean Random Sample

Forecasting: Intentions, Expectations, and Confidence. David Rothschild Yahoo! Research, Economist December 17, 2011

EconS Nash Equilibrium in Games with Continuous Action Spaces.

Three-Way Contingency Tables

Are data normally normally distributed?

Can a Pseudo Panel be a Substitute for a Genuine Panel?

The Uncertain Quality of Popular Opinion About Arkansas Delegate Selection Format

Events A and B are said to be independent if the occurrence of A does not affect the probability of B.

Harrison Drury and Co Limited. IT/HR/other corporate

Carolyn Anderson & YoungShil Paek (Slide contributors: Shuai Wang, Yi Zheng, Michael Culbertson, & Haiyan Li)

Chapter 8. The analysis of count data. This is page 236 Printer: Opaque this

Spring Break Assignment- 3 of 3. Question 1.

Political Science Fall 2018

Advanced Quantitative Research Methodology Lecture Notes: January Ecological 28, 2012 Inference1 / 38

Weather and Elections: Who prays for rain?

UC Berkeley Math 10B, Spring 2015: Midterm 2 Prof. Sturmfels, April 9, SOLUTIONS

Forecasting the 2012 Presidential Election from History and the Polls

Chi square test of independence

Generative classifiers: The Gaussian classifier. Ata Kaban School of Computer Science University of Birmingham

Chi square test of independence

1988 Chilean Elections

ST3241 Categorical Data Analysis I Multicategory Logit Models. Logit Models For Nominal Responses

Conditional Probability Solutions STAT-UB.0103 Statistics for Business Control and Regression Models

STA 4504/5503 Sample Exam 1 Spring 2011 Categorical Data Analysis. 1. Indicate whether each of the following is true (T) or false (F).

STP 226 EXAMPLE EXAM #3 INSTRUCTOR:

Nicole Dalzell. July 3, 2014

1 MA421 Introduction. Ashis Gangopadhyay. Department of Mathematics and Statistics. Boston University. c Ashis Gangopadhyay

Dummies and Interactions

3) A flagpole casts a shadow that is 21 m long when the angle between the sun s rays and

Solutions: Monday, October 22

Chapter 8: Confidence Interval Estimation: Further Topics

Recovering Social Networks by Observing Votes

2003 National Name Exchange Annual Report

Chi-Square. Heibatollah Baghi, and Mastee Badii

Statistics, continued

Ever since elections for office have been held, people. Accuracy of Combined Forecasts for the 2012 Presidential Election: The PollyVote FEATURES

Accuracy of Combined Forecasts for the 2012 Presidential Election: The PollyVote

AP Stats MOCK Chapter 7 Test MC

STAT:5100 (22S:193) Statistical Inference I

Political Cycles and Stock Returns. Pietro Veronesi

Exploratory Data Analysis

Psych 230. Psychological Measurement and Statistics

Sample Profile Report

Lecture 41 Sections Mon, Apr 7, 2008

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE EXAMINATION. ST3241 Categorical Data Analysis. (Semester II: ) April/May, 2011 Time Allowed : 2 Hours

Quantitative Introduction ro Risk and Uncertainty in Business Module 5: Hypothesis Testing

CHAPTER 1: Preliminary Description of Errors Experiment Methodology and Errors To introduce the concept of error analysis, let s take a real world

MN 400: Research Methods. CHAPTER 7 Sample Design

Discrete Distributions

Confidence Intervals for the Mean of Non-normal Data Class 23, Jeremy Orloff and Jonathan Bloom

S o c i o l o g y E x a m 2 A n s w e r K e y - D R A F T M a r c h 2 7,

Lecture 3: Vectors. In Song Kim. September 1, 2011

Section 4. Test-Level Analyses

Supplemental Material for Policy Deliberation and Voter Persuasion: Experimental Evidence from an Election in the Philippines

Formalizing Probability. Choosing the Sample Space. Probability Measures

URP4273 FINAL PROJECT

R I A H O U S E THE SUPPLY SIDE OF THE ON-LINE COMMERICAL SEX MARKET IN MASSACHUSETTS: A DATA MINING STUDY J

Variables and Variable De nitions

Supplementary Information: Network Structure Explains the Impact of Attitudes on Voting Decisions

Confidence Intervals for the Sample Mean

Lesson 19: Understanding Variability When Estimating a Population Proportion

Identify the scale of measurement most appropriate for each of the following variables. (Use A = nominal, B = ordinal, C = interval, D = ratio.

Econ 325: Introduction to Empirical Economics

BBC Olympics Legacy Survey

Exam 1 Solutions. Problem Points Score Total 145

Transcription:

Michigan Results For 9/21/2012-9/22/2012 Contact: Doug Kaplan, 407-242-1870 Executive Summary On the afternoon and evenings of September 21 22, 2012, Gravis Marketing, a non-partisan research firm, and Capitol Correspondent conducted a survey of 1,036 potential voters in Likely Voters, presidential race All potential voters, presidential race 60% 40% 20% 0% Very likely Obama Likely Obama Undecided Somewhat likely Romney Likely Romney Very likely Romney % of Total 43.4% 6.6% 3.8% 2.8% 6.6% 36.8% % of Total 60% 40% 20% 0% 44.5% 6.8% Very likely Obama Likely Obama Somewhat likel.. Undecided 1.4% Somewhat likely Romney Likely Romney Very likely Romney 6.2% 2.1% 4.8% 34.2% Presidential race, overall Presidential race, likely voters % of Total 60% 40% 20% 0% Obama Other 52.7% Romney 6.2% 41.1% 60% 40% 20% 0% Obama Other Romney % of Total 50.0% 3.8% 46.2% 1

Michigan regarding their likely vote for a given presidential candidate. Of the 1,036 potential voters, 804 classified themselves as somewhat likely, likely, or very likely to vote in November. The poll carries a margin of error of 3.3%. A full list of the questions, summaries of the responses, and the cross tabulations follow. The poll asked whether individuals are very likely, somewhat likely, likely, very unlikely, somewhat unlikely, or unlikely to vote for a given candidate. The results shown above contain both effects of keeping unlikely and likely voters and eliminating any participant who indicated very unlikely, likely, and somewhat unlikely to vote. Overall, among likely voters, Obama holds a 50.0% to 46.2% lead. When looking at the presidential election through the lens of all potential voters, Obama holds a 52.7% to 41.1% advantage, with 6.2% undecided. Interestingly, when eliminating individuals that self-identify as unlikely, somewhat unlikely, or very unlikely to vote, the race narrows from 11.6% to 3.8%. Additionally, the group of undecided potential voters decline by about 39% from 6.2% to 3.8%. Switching to the senate race, Stabenow holds a 53.5% to 39.6% lead among likely voters and a 54.0% to 36.7% lead among all potential voters. The same pattern of narrowing holds for the senate race as it does for the presidential race, although the narrowing effect in the senate race is of a much lesser magnitude. 2

Likely voters, senate race All potential voters, senate race % of Total 40% 20% 0% 43.6% 5.0% 5.0% 6.9% 3.0% 5.0% 31.7% % of Total 40% 20% 0% 38.8% 7.9% 7.2% 9.4% 2.2% 4.3% 30.2% Very likely Stabenow Likely Stabeno.. Somewhat likely Stabenow Undecided Somewhat likely Hoekstra Likely Hoekstra Very likely Hoekstra Very likely Stabenow Likely Stabeno.. Somewhat likely Stabenow Undecided Somewhat likely Hoekstra Likely Hoekstra Very likely Hoekstra, likely voters, overall 60% 53.5% 60% 54.0% % of Total 40% 20% % of Total 40% 20% 36.7% 9.4% 0% Stabenow Hoekstra Other 0% Stabenow Hoekstra Other 39.6% 6.9% A summary of the results and the crosstabs is presented in the following pages. Data Summary Party affiliation Democrat 33.6% Other 38.4% Republican 27.9% Race Black 11.9% Other 4.2% White 83.9% Religious affiliation Catholic 27.7% Jewish 1.3% 3

Muslim 1.9% Other 16.4% Protestant/Other Christian 52.8% Age group 18-29 19.0% 30-49 36.6% 50-64 27.5% 65+ 17.0% Sex Female 51.6% Male 48.4% L Obama 6.8% L Romney 4.8% SL Obama 1.4% SL Romney 2.1% Undecided 6.2% VL Obama 44.5% VL Romney 34.2% L Hoekstra 4.3% L Stabenow 7.9% SL Hoekstra 2.2% SL Stabenow 7.2% Undecided 9.4% VL Hoekstra 30.2% VL Stabenow 38.8% 4

Survey Questions 1. Are you registered to vote? (Yes, No) 2. How likely are you to vote in this year s presidential elections? (Very unlikely, Unlikely, Somewhat unlikely, Somewhat likely, Likely, Very likely) 3. In which party are you either registered to vote or do you consider yourself a member of? (Democrat, Republican, independent or minority party) 4. What race do you identify yourself as? (White/Caucasian, African-American, Hispanic, Asian, Other) 5. Which of the following best represents your religious affiliation? (Roman Catholic, Protestant/other non-denominational Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Other/no affiliation) 7. What is your Gender? (Male, Female) 8. If the presidential election were held today, whom would you vote for? (Very likely Obama, Likely Obama, Somewhat likely Obama, Undecided, Somewhat likely Romney, Likely Romney, Very likely Romney) 9. If the election for U.S. Senate were held today, whom would you vote for (Very likely Debbie Stabenow, Likely Stabenow, Somewhat likely Stabenow, Undecided, Somewhat likely Pete Hoekstra, Likely Hoekstra, Very likely Hoekstra) Note: the statistical methodology comprised weighing sex and age for anticipated voting proportions for the 2012 General Election. 5

Thursday September 27 17:11:53 2012 Page 1 All Potential Voters log type: smcl opened on: 27 Sep 2012, 17:10:21. tab2 likelihoodtovote party race religiousaffiliation agegroup sex preside ntialelection senaterace, cell chi2 lrchi2 nofreq - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by party Party vote Democrat Other Republica Total Somewhat likely 0.00 1.31 0.00 1.31 Somewhat unlikely 1.75 0.87 1.31 3.93 Unlikely 0.87 2.62 0.00 3.49 Very likely 19.65 24.45 23.14 67.25 Very unlikely 11.35 9.17 3.49 24.02 Total 33.62 38.43 27.95 100.00 Pearson chi2( 8) = 20.9727 Pr = 0.007 likelihood-ratio chi2( 8) =. - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by race Race vote Black Other White Total Somewhat unlikely 0.60 0.00 4.76 5.36 Unlikely 1.79 0.00 1.79 3.57 Very likely 4.76 4.17 60.71 69.64 Very unlikely 4.76 0.00 16.67 21.43 Total 11.90 4.17 83.93 100.00 Pearson chi2( 6) = 17.2718 Pr = 0.008 likelihood-ratio chi2( 6) =. - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by religiousaffiliation Religious affiliation vote Catholic Jewish Muslim Other Protestan Total Somewhat unlikely 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.77 4.40 Unlikely 0.63 0.00 0.00 2.52 0.63 3.77 Very likely 23.27 0.00 1.26 11.32 36.48 72.33 Very unlikely 3.14 1.26 0.63 2.52 11.95 19.50 Total 27.67 1.26 1.89 16.35 52.83 100.00 Pearson chi2( 12) = 26.0184 Pr = 0.011 likelihood-ratio chi2( 12) =. - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by agegroup

Thursday September 27 17:11:54 2012 Page 2 Age group vote 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+ Total Somewhat unlikely 3.27 0.65 0.00 0.00 3.92 Unlikely 2.61 0.00 0.00 1.31 3.92 Very likely 10.46 30.72 21.57 9.80 72.55 Very unlikely 2.61 5.23 5.88 5.88 19.61 Total 18.95 36.60 27.45 16.99 100.00 Pearson chi2( 9) = 36.0042 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 9) =. - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by sex All Potential Voters Sex vote Female Male Total Somewhat unlikely 0.65 3.27 3.92 Unlikely 0.65 3.27 3.92 Very likely 37.91 34.64 72.55 Very unlikely 12.42 7.19 19.61 Total 51.63 48.37 100.00 Pearson chi2( 3) = 7.5365 Pr = 0.057 likelihood-ratio chi2( 3) = 8.0433 Pr = 0.045 - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by presidentialelection vote L Obama L Romney SL Obama SL Romney Undecided VL Obama VL Romney Total Somewhat unlikely 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 2.05 2.74 Unlikely 0.00 0.00 1.37 0.00 2.05 0.68 0.00 4.11 Very likely 4.79 4.79 0.00 2.05 2.74 31.51 26.71 72.60 Very unlikely 2.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 12.33 5.48 20.55 Total 6.85 4.79 1.37 2.05 6.16 44.52 34.25 100.00 Pearson chi2( 18) = 83.1173 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 18) =. - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by senaterace vote L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided V L Hoekst VL Staben Total Somewhat unlikely 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 1.44 0.00 2.16 Unlikely 0.00 0.72 0.00 2.88 0.72 0.00 0.00 4.32 Very likely 3.60 3.60 2.16 3.60 5.04 23.02 31.65 72.66 Very unlikely 0.72 3.60 0.00 0.00 3.60 5.76 7.19 20.86

Thursday September 27 17:11:54 2012 Page 3 Total 4.32 7.91 2.16 7.19 9.35 30.22 38.85 100.00 Pearson chi2( 18) = 52.6039 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 18) =. - tabulation of party by race Race Party Black Other White Total Democrat 7.14 0.00 29.17 36.31 Other 3.57 2.98 25.60 32.14 Republican 1.19 1.19 29.17 31.55 Total 11.90 4.17 83.93 100.00 Pearson chi2( 4) = 12.6579 Pr = 0.013 likelihood-ratio chi2( 4) =. - tabulation of party by religiousaffiliation al All Potential Voters Religious affiliation Party Catholic Jewish Muslim Other Protestan Tot Democrat 6.92 1.26 0.63 9.43 16.35 34. 59 Other 9.43 0.00 1.26 6.29 16.98 33. 96 Republican 11.32 0.00 0.00 0.63 19.50 31. 45 00 Total 27.67 1.26 1.89 16.35 52.83 100. Pearson chi2( 8) = 19.7584 Pr = 0.011 likelihood-ratio chi2( 8) =. - tabulation of party by agegroup Age group Party 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+ Total Democrat 5.23 12.42 11.76 3.27 32.68 Other 9.15 5.88 10.46 9.80 35.29 Republican 4.58 18.30 5.23 3.92 32.03 Total 18.95 36.60 27.45 16.99 100.00 Pearson chi2( 6) = 23.1355 Pr = 0.001 likelihood-ratio chi2( 6) = 23.7091 Pr = 0.001 - tabulation of party by sex Sex Party Female Male Total Democrat 15.69 16.99 32.68 Other 14.38 20.92 35.29 Republican 21.57 10.46 32.03 Total 51.63 48.37 100.00

Thursday September 27 17:11:54 2012 Page 4 Pearson chi2( 2) = 7.6746 Pr = 0.022 likelihood-ratio chi2( 2) = 7.8016 Pr = 0.020 - tabulation of party by presidentialelection Party L Obama L Romney SL Obama SL Romney Undecided VL Obam a VL Romney Total Democrat 2.74 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.68 27.4 0 2.74 34.25 Other 3.42 3.42 0.68 0.00 4.79 13.7 0 6.16 32.19 Republican 0.68 1.37 0.00 2.05 0.68 3.4 2 25.34 33.56 Total 6.85 4.79 1.37 2.05 6.16 44.5 2 34.25 100.00 Pearson chi2( 12) = 88.7399 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 12) =. - tabulation of party by senaterace All Potential Voters Party L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided VL Hoeks t VL Staben Total Democrat 0.00 3.60 0.00 1.44 2.16 2.8 8 24.46 34.53 Other 0.72 4.32 2.16 5.04 3.60 5.7 6 10.07 31.65 Republican 3.60 0.00 0.00 0.72 3.60 21.5 8 4.32 33.81 Total 4.32 7.91 2.16 7.19 9.35 30.2 2 38.85 100.00 Pearson chi2( 12) = 75.6689 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 12) =. - tabulation of race by religiousaffiliation al 95 40 65 00 Religious affiliation Race Catholic Jewish Muslim Other Protestan Tot Black 3.14 0.00 0.00 3.77 5.03 11. Other 0.00 0.00 1.26 0.00 3.14 4. White 24.53 1.26 0.63 12.58 44.65 83. Total 27.67 1.26 1.89 16.35 52.83 100. Pearson chi2( 8) = 35.0147 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 8) =.

Thursday September 27 17:11:54 2012 Page 5 - tabulation of race by agegroup Age group Race 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+ Total Black 3.92 3.27 3.92 0.00 11.11 Other 1.31 3.27 0.00 0.00 4.58 White 13.73 30.07 23.53 16.99 84.31 Total 18.95 36.60 27.45 16.99 100.00 Pearson chi2( 6) = 12.9639 Pr = 0.044 likelihood-ratio chi2( 6) =. - tabulation of race by sex Sex Race Female Male Total Black 2.61 8.50 11.11 Other 1.31 3.27 4.58 White 47.71 36.60 84.31 Total 51.63 48.37 100.00 Pearson chi2( 2) = 8.1360 Pr = 0.017 likelihood-ratio chi2( 2) = 8.4285 Pr = 0.015 - tabulation of race by presidentialelection Race L Obama L Romney SL Obama SL Romney Undecided VL Obam a VL Romney Total Black 2.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.05 4.1 1 3.42 11.64 Other 0.00 1.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 1.37 White 4.79 3.42 1.37 2.05 4.11 40.4 1 30.82 86.99 Total 6.85 4.79 1.37 2.05 6.16 44.5 2 34.25 100.00 Pearson chi2( 12) = 49.2928 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 12) =. - tabulation of race by senaterace All Potential Voters Race L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided VL Hoeks t VL Staben Total Black 0.00 1.44 0.00 2.16 0.00 4.3 2 4.32 12.23 Other 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 1.44 White 2.88 6.47 2.16 5.04 9.35 25.9 0 34.53 86.33 Total 4.32 7.91 2.16 7.19 9.35 30.2 2 38.85 100.00

Thursday September 27 17:11:54 2012 Page 6 All Potential Voters Pearson chi2( 12) = 51.1175 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 12) =. - tabulation of religiousaffiliation by agegroup Age group Religious affiliation 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+ Tot al Catholic 5.88 5.88 11.11 5.23 28. 10 Jewish 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.31 1. 31 Muslim 1.31 0.65 0.00 0.00 1. 96 Other 5.88 7.84 1.31 0.65 15. 69 Protestant/Other Chri 5.88 22.22 15.03 9.80 52. 94 00 Total 18.95 36.60 27.45 16.99 100. Pearson chi2( 12) = 34.4975 Pr = 0.001 likelihood-ratio chi2( 12) =. - tabulation of religiousaffiliation by sex Sex Religious affiliation Female Male Total Catholic 14.38 13.73 28.10 Jewish 1.31 0.00 1.31 Muslim 0.00 1.96 1.96 Other 3.92 11.76 15.69 Protestant/Other Chri 32.03 20.92 52.94 Total 51.63 48.37 100.00 Pearson chi2( 4) = 14.4432 Pr = 0.006 likelihood-ratio chi2( 4) =. - tabulation of religiousaffiliation by presidentialelection Religious affiliation L Obama L Romney SL Obama SL Romney Undecide d VL Obama VL Romney Total Catholic 2.05 0.00 0.68 0.00 2.7 4 9.59 14.38 29.45 Jewish 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 1.37 0.00 1.37 Muslim 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0.68 0.00 0.68 Other 1.37 2.05 0.00 0.00 2.0 5 10.27 0.68 16.44 Protestant/Other Chri 3.42 2.74 0.68 2.05 1.3 7 22.60 19.18 52.05 Total 6.85 4.79 1.37 2.05 6.1 6 44.52 34.25 100.00

Thursday September 27 17:11:55 2012 Page 7 Pearson chi2( 24) = 28.3091 Pr = 0.247 likelihood-ratio chi2( 24) =. - tabulation of religiousaffiliation by senaterace Religious affiliation L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecide d VL Hoekst VL Staben Total Catholic 0.72 2.16 0.00 2.88 0.0 0 14.39 9.35 29.50 Jewish 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.4 4 0.00 0.00 1.44 Other 0.00 2.16 2.16 2.16 0.7 2 0.72 9.35 17.27 Protestant/Other Chri 3.60 3.60 0.00 2.16 7.1 9 15.11 20.14 51.80 Total 4.32 7.91 2.16 7.19 9.3 5 30.22 38.85 100.00 Pearson chi2( 18) = 57.4006 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 18) =. - tabulation of agegroup by sex Sex Age group Female Male Total 18-29 5.23 13.73 18.95 30-49 20.26 16.34 36.60 50-64 13.07 14.38 27.45 65+ 13.07 3.92 16.99 Total 51.63 48.37 100.00 Pearson chi2( 3) = 13.9556 Pr = 0.003 likelihood-ratio chi2( 3) = 14.5694 Pr = 0.002 - tabulation of agegroup by presidentialelection Age group L Obama L Romney SL Obama SL Romney Undecided VL Obam a VL Romney Total 18-29 1.37 0.00 0.68 0.00 2.05 6.1 6 6.85 17.12 30-49 1.37 3.42 0.00 2.05 1.37 11.6 4 16.44 36.30 50-64 3.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.74 15.7 5 6.85 28.77 65+ 0.68 1.37 0.68 0.00 0.00 10.9 6 4.11 17.81 Total 6.85 4.79 1.37 2.05 6.16 44.5 2 34.25 100.00 Pearson chi2( 18) = 31.3151 Pr = 0.026 likelihood-ratio chi2( 18) =. - tabulation of agegroup by senaterace All Potential Voters

Thursday September 27 17:11:55 2012 Page 8 Age group L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided VL Hoeks t VL Staben Total 18-29 0.00 1.44 0.00 2.16 0.72 6.4 7 5.76 16.55 30-49 3.60 2.16 2.16 0.72 2.16 14.3 9 11.51 36.69 50-64 0.72 2.16 0.00 2.88 0.72 5.7 6 15.83 28.06 65+ 0.00 2.16 0.00 1.44 5.76 3.6 0 5.76 18.71 Total 4.32 7.91 2.16 7.19 9.35 30.2 2 38.85 100.00 Pearson chi2( 18) = 39.9328 Pr = 0.002 likelihood-ratio chi2( 18) =. - tabulation of sex by presidentialelection Sex L Obama L Romney SL Obama SL Romney Undecided VL Obam a VL Romney Total Female 1.37 4.79 0.68 2.05 3.42 22.6 0 19.18 54.11 Male 5.48 0.00 0.68 0.00 2.74 21.9 2 15.07 45.89 Total 6.85 4.79 1.37 2.05 6.16 44.5 2 34.25 100.00 Pearson chi2( 6) = 13.5517 Pr = 0.035 likelihood-ratio chi2( 6) =. - tabulation of sex by senaterace All Potential Voters Sex L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided VL Hoeks t VL Staben Total Female 2.88 0.72 2.16 4.32 7.91 17.9 9 20.86 56.83 Male 1.44 7.19 0.00 2.88 1.44 12.2 3 17.99 43.17 Total 4.32 7.91 2.16 7.19 9.35 30.2 2 38.85 100.00 Pearson chi2( 6) = 17.2055 Pr = 0.009 likelihood-ratio chi2( 6) =. - tabulation of presidentialelection by senaterace

Thursday September 27 17:11:55 2012 Page 9 Presidenti al election L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided VL Hoeks t VL Staben Total L Obama 0.00 4.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.7 2 0.00 5.04 L Romney 1.44 0.00 2.16 0.00 1.44 0.0 0 0.00 5.04 SL Obama 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 1.44 SL Romney 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.16 0.0 0 0.00 2.16 Undecided 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.76 0.00 0.0 0 0.72 6.47 VL Obama 0.00 2.88 0.00 0.00 4.32 0.0 0 38.13 45.32 VL Romney 2.88 0.00 0.00 0.72 1.44 29.5 0 0.00 34.53 Total 4.32 7.91 2.16 7.19 9.35 30.2 2 38.85 100.00 Pearson chi2( 36) = 398.7500 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 36) =.. All Potential Voters log type: smcl closed on: 27 Sep 2012, 17:11:20

Thursday September 27 17:16:59 2012 Page 1 ONLY LIKELY VOTERS log type: smcl opened on: 27 Sep 2012, 17:15:40. tab2 likelihoodtovote party race religiousaffiliation agegroup sex preside ntialelection senaterace, cell chi2 lrchi2 nofreq - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by party Party vote Democrat Other Republica Total Somewhat likely 0.00 1.91 0.00 1.91 Very likely 28.66 35.67 33.76 98.09 Total 28.66 37.58 33.76 100.00 Pearson chi2( 2) = 5.0801 Pr = 0.079 likelihood-ratio chi2( 2) =. - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by race Race vote Black Other White Total Very likely 6.84 5.98 87.18 100.00 Total 6.84 5.98 87.18 100.00 - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by religiousaffiliation Religious affiliation vote Catholic Muslim Other Protestan Total Very likely 32.17 1.74 15.65 50.43 100.00 Total 32.17 1.74 15.65 50.43 100.00 - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by agegroup Age group vote 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+ Total Very likely 14.41 42.34 29.73 13.51 100.00 Total 14.41 42.34 29.73 13.51 100.00 - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by sex Sex vote Female Male Total Very likely 52.25 47.75 100.00 Total 52.25 47.75 100.00 - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by presidentialelection

Thursday September 27 17:16:59 2012 Page 2 ONLY LIKELY VOTERS vote L Obama L Romney SL Romney Undecided VL Obama VL Romney Total Very likely 6.60 6.60 2.83 3.77 43.40 36.79 100.00 Total 6.60 6.60 2.83 3.77 43.40 36.79 100.00 - tabulation of likelihoodtovote by senaterace vote L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided VL Hoekst VL Staben Total Very likely 4.95 4.95 2.97 4.95 6.93 31.68 43.56 100.00 Total 4.95 4.95 2.97 4.95 6.93 31.68 43.56 100.00 - tabulation of party by race Race Party Black Other White Total Democrat 3.42 0.00 26.50 29.91 Other 2.56 4.27 25.64 32.48 Republican 0.85 1.71 35.04 37.61 Total 6.84 5.98 87.18 100.00 Pearson chi2( 4) = 8.4826 Pr = 0.075 likelihood-ratio chi2( 4) =. - tabulation of party by religiousaffiliation Religious affiliation Party Catholic Muslim Other Protestan Total Democrat 8.70 0.00 8.70 12.17 29.57 Other 11.30 1.74 6.09 13.91 33.04 Republican 12.17 0.00 0.87 24.35 37.39 Total 32.17 1.74 15.65 50.43 100.00 Pearson chi2( 6) = 16.3003 Pr = 0.012 likelihood-ratio chi2( 6) =. - tabulation of party by agegroup Age group Party 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+ Total Democrat 5.41 10.81 9.91 0.90 27.03 Other 5.41 8.11 12.61 8.11 34.23 Republican 3.60 23.42 7.21 4.50 38.74 Total 14.41 42.34 29.73 13.51 100.00

Thursday September 27 17:16:59 2012 Page 3 Pearson chi2( 6) = 16.2222 Pr = 0.013 likelihood-ratio chi2( 6) = 17.1406 Pr = 0.009 - tabulation of party by sex Sex Party Female Male Total Democrat 12.61 14.41 27.03 Other 14.41 19.82 34.23 Republican 25.23 13.51 38.74 Total 52.25 47.75 100.00 Pearson chi2( 2) = 4.7954 Pr = 0.091 likelihood-ratio chi2( 2) = 4.8519 Pr = 0.088 - tabulation of party by presidentialelection Party L Obama L Romney SL Romney Undecided VL Obama VL Romne y Total Democrat 1.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.42 0.0 0 28.30 Other 4.72 4.72 0.00 3.77 12.26 5.6 6 31.13 Republican 0.00 1.89 2.83 0.00 4.72 31.1 3 40.57 Total 6.60 6.60 2.83 3.77 43.40 36.7 9 100.00 Pearson chi2( 10) = 85.7750 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 10) =. - tabulation of party by senaterace ONLY LIKELY VOTERS Party L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided VL Hoeks t VL Staben Total Democrat 0.00 2.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 25.74 28.71 Other 0.00 1.98 2.97 3.96 1.98 5.9 4 12.87 29.70 Republican 4.95 0.00 0.00 0.99 4.95 25.7 4 4.95 41.58 Total 4.95 4.95 2.97 4.95 6.93 31.6 8 43.56 100.00 Pearson chi2( 12) = 74.2460 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 12) =. - tabulation of race by religiousaffiliation

Thursday September 27 17:16:59 2012 Page 4 Religious affiliation Race Catholic Muslim Other Protestan Total Black 3.48 0.00 0.87 2.61 6.96 Other 0.00 1.74 0.00 4.35 6.09 White 28.70 0.00 14.78 43.48 86.96 Total 32.17 1.74 15.65 50.43 100.00 Pearson chi2( 6) = 36.0640 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 6) =. - tabulation of race by agegroup Age group Race 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+ Total Black 0.90 2.70 1.80 0.00 5.41 Other 1.80 4.50 0.00 0.00 6.31 White 11.71 35.14 27.93 13.51 88.29 Total 14.41 42.34 29.73 13.51 100.00 Pearson chi2( 6) = 6.9324 Pr = 0.327 likelihood-ratio chi2( 6) =. - tabulation of race by sex Sex Race Female Male Total Black 0.00 5.41 5.41 Other 1.80 4.50 6.31 White 50.45 37.84 88.29 Total 52.25 47.75 100.00 Pearson chi2( 2) = 9.0789 Pr = 0.011 likelihood-ratio chi2( 2) =. - tabulation of race by presidentialelection Race L Obama L Romney SL Romney Undecided VL Obama VL Romne y Total Black 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.89 3.7 7 5.66 Other 0.00 1.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 1.89 White 6.60 4.72 2.83 3.77 41.51 33.0 2 92.45 Total 6.60 6.60 2.83 3.77 43.40 36.7 9 100.00 Pearson chi2( 10) = 31.5726 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 10) =. - tabulation of race by senaterace ONLY LIKELY VOTERS

Thursday September 27 17:16:59 2012 Page 5 ONLY LIKELY VOTERS Race L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided VL Hoeks t VL Staben Total Black 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.9 6 1.98 5.94 Other 1.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 1.98 White 2.97 4.95 2.97 4.95 6.93 27.7 2 41.58 92.08 Total 4.95 4.95 2.97 4.95 6.93 31.6 8 43.56 100.00 Pearson chi2( 12) = 43.1694 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 12) =. - tabulation of religiousaffiliation by agegroup Age group Religious affiliation 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+ Tot al Catholic 4.50 8.11 13.51 6.31 32. 43 Muslim 1.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 80 Other 5.41 8.11 1.80 0.00 15. 32 Protestant/Other Chri 2.70 26.13 14.41 7.21 50. 45 00 Total 14.41 42.34 29.73 13.51 100. Pearson chi2( 9) = 31.2534 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 9) =. - tabulation of religiousaffiliation by sex Sex Religious affiliation Female Male Total Catholic 16.22 16.22 32.43 Muslim 0.00 1.80 1.80 Other 5.41 9.91 15.32 Protestant/Other Chri 30.63 19.82 50.45 Total 52.25 47.75 100.00 Pearson chi2( 3) = 5.8286 Pr = 0.120 likelihood-ratio chi2( 3) =. - tabulation of religiousaffiliation by presidentialelection

Thursday September 27 17:16:59 2012 Page 6 Religious affiliation L Obama L Romney SL Romney Undecided VL Obam a VL Romney Total Catholic 1.89 0.00 0.00 3.77 12.2 6 16.04 33.96 Other 0.00 2.83 0.00 0.00 12.2 6 0.94 16.04 Protestant/Other Chri 4.72 3.77 2.83 0.00 18.8 7 19.81 50.00 Total 6.60 6.60 2.83 3.77 43.4 0 36.79 100.00 Pearson chi2( 10) = 28.9026 Pr = 0.001 likelihood-ratio chi2( 10) =. - tabulation of religiousaffiliation by senaterace Religious affiliation L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecide d VL Hoekst VL Staben Total Catholic 0.00 1.98 0.00 3.96 0.0 0 16.83 11.88 34.65 Other 0.00 0.99 2.97 0.00 0.0 0 0.99 11.88 16.83 Protestant/Other Chri 4.95 1.98 0.00 0.99 6.9 3 13.86 19.80 48.51 Total 4.95 4.95 2.97 4.95 6.9 3 31.68 43.56 100.00 Pearson chi2( 12) = 42.8492 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 12) =. - tabulation of agegroup by sex ONLY LIKELY VOTERS Sex Age group Female Male Total 18-29 2.70 11.71 14.41 30-49 26.13 16.22 42.34 50-64 12.61 17.12 29.73 65+ 10.81 2.70 13.51 Total 52.25 47.75 100.00 Pearson chi2( 3) = 14.7868 Pr = 0.002 likelihood-ratio chi2( 3) = 15.6543 Pr = 0.001 - tabulation of agegroup by presidentialelection

Thursday September 27 17:17:00 2012 Page 7 Age group L Obama L Romney SL Romney Undecided VL Obama VL Romne y Total 18-29 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.49 3.7 7 13.21 30-49 0.00 4.72 2.83 0.00 14.15 19.8 1 41.51 50-64 4.72 0.00 0.00 3.77 14.15 8.4 9 31.13 65+ 0.94 1.89 0.00 0.00 6.60 4.7 2 14.15 Total 6.60 6.60 2.83 3.77 43.40 36.7 9 100.00 Pearson chi2( 15) = 30.1844 Pr = 0.011 likelihood-ratio chi2( 15) =. - tabulation of agegroup by senaterace Age group L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided VL Hoeks t VL Staben Total 18-29 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.99 2.9 7 7.92 12.87 30-49 4.95 0.99 2.97 0.00 2.97 16.8 3 13.86 42.57 50-64 0.00 1.98 0.00 3.96 0.99 7.9 2 14.85 29.70 65+ 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.99 1.98 3.9 6 6.93 14.85 Total 4.95 4.95 2.97 4.95 6.93 31.6 8 43.56 100.00 Pearson chi2( 18) = 24.4088 Pr = 0.142 likelihood-ratio chi2( 18) =. - tabulation of sex by presidentialelection Sex L Obama L Romney SL Romney Undecided VL Obama VL Romne y Total Female 0.94 6.60 2.83 3.77 19.81 20.7 5 54.72 Male 5.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.58 16.0 4 45.28 Total 6.60 6.60 2.83 3.77 43.40 36.7 9 100.00 Pearson chi2( 5) = 17.7751 Pr = 0.003 likelihood-ratio chi2( 5) =. - tabulation of sex by senaterace ONLY LIKELY VOTERS

Thursday September 27 17:17:00 2012 Page 8 Sex L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided VL Hoeks t VL Staben Total Female 3.96 0.99 2.97 4.95 5.94 17.8 2 20.79 57.43 Male 0.99 3.96 0.00 0.00 0.99 13.8 6 22.77 42.57 Total 4.95 4.95 2.97 4.95 6.93 31.6 8 43.56 100.00 Pearson chi2( 6) = 13.8399 Pr = 0.031 likelihood-ratio chi2( 6) =. - tabulation of presidentialelection by senaterace Presidenti al election L Hoekstr L Stabeno SL Hoekst SL Staben Undecided VL Hoeks t VL Staben Total L Obama 0.00 3.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 3.96 L Romney 1.98 0.00 2.97 0.00 1.98 0.0 0 0.00 6.93 SL Romney 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.97 0.0 0 0.00 2.97 Undecided 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.96 0.00 0.0 0 0.00 3.96 VL Obama 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 43.56 44.55 VL Romney 2.97 0.00 0.00 0.99 1.98 31.6 8 0.00 37.62 Total 4.95 4.95 2.97 4.95 6.93 31.6 8 43.56 100.00 Pearson chi2( 30) = 358.0508 Pr = 0.000 likelihood-ratio chi2( 30) =.. ONLY LIKELY VOTERS log type: smcl closed on: 27 Sep 2012, 17:16:32 l