Ocean & Sea Ice SAF. Validation of ice products January March Version 1.1. May 2005

Similar documents
Ocean & Sea Ice SAF. Validation of ice products January September Version 1.0. September 2004

A New Global Ice Analysis System

The importance of long-term Arctic weather station data for setting the research stage for climate change studies

Canadian Ice Service

Floating Ice: Progress in Addressing Science Goals

Produced by Canadian Ice Service of. 2 December Seasonal Outlook Gulf of St Lawrence and East Newfoundland Waters Winter

Satellites, Weather and Climate Module??: Polar Vortex

Exemplar for Internal Achievement Standard. Mathematics and Statistics Level 3

OSI SAF Sea Ice products

Freeze-Up Studies of the Alaskan Beaufort and Chukchi Seas: through Coastal Frontiers Corporation Vaudrey & Associates, Inc.

Agricultural Science Climatology Semester 2, Anne Green / Richard Thompson

Loitering of the Retrea1ng Sea Ice Edge in the Arc1c Seas

APPENDIX B PHYSICAL BASELINE STUDY: NORTHEAST BAFFIN BAY 1

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE FORECAST BRIEFING. October 27, 2017 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region

Modeling of the sea ice and the ocean in the Nares Strait

Current status and plans for developing sea ice forecast services and products for the WMO Arctic Regional Climate Centre Sea Ice Outlook

Making a Climograph: GLOBE Data Explorations

SST measurements over the Arctic based on METOP data

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

Sea ice concentration off Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica

OSI SAF Sea Ice Products

Changing Marine Access in the Arctic Ocean: The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment Panama Canal Authority 11 January 2005

Climatic Conditions Around Greenland 1993

J8.4 TRENDS OF U.S. SNOWFALL AND SNOW COVER IN A WARMING WORLD,

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING. December 22, 2017 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region

Bugs in JRA-55 snow depth analysis

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 24 September 2012

Use and impact of ATOVS in the DMI-HIRLAM regional weather model

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 11 November 2013

Sea Ice Forecast Verification in the Canadian Global Ice Ocean Prediction System

Causes of high PM 10 values measured in Denmark in 2006

Second Session of the Pan-Arctic Regional Climate Outlook Forum (PARCOF-2), virtual forum, October 2018

2015 Fall Conditions Report

Prepared by the North American Ice Service. 4 December Seasonal Outlook Great Lakes Winter

SEA ICE PREDICTION NETWORK (SIPN) Template for Pan-Arctic Sea Ice Outlook Core Contributions August 2015 Report

Polar Portal Season Report 2013

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE FORECAST BRIEFING. December 15, 2014 Rick Thoman NWS Alaska Region ESSD Climate Services

Third Grade Math and Science DBQ Weather and Climate/Representing and Interpreting Charts and Data - Teacher s Guide

Third Grade Math and Science DBQ Weather and Climate/Representing and Interpreting Charts and Data

MAIN ATTRIBUTES OF THE PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS DEVELOPED BY THE HYDROLOGY SAF PROJECT RESULTS OF THE VALIDATION IN HUNGARY

Polar Lows and other High Latitude Weather Systems. John Turner and Tom Bracegirdle British Antarctic Survey Cambridge, UK

8.1 Attachment 1: Ambient Weather Conditions at Jervoise Bay, Cockburn Sound

Climatology of Surface Wind Speeds Using a Regional Climate Model

Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for the OSI SAF Global Sea Ice Edge and Type Product

Changing predictability characteristics of Arctic sea ice in a warming climate

US Drought Status. Droughts 1/17/2013. Percent land area affected by Drought across US ( ) Dev Niyogi Associate Professor Dept of Agronomy

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE FORECAST BRIEFING. January 23, 2015 Rick Thoman ESSD Climate Services

Characterization of the Present-Day Arctic Atmosphere in CCSM4

Great Lakes Update. Volume 188: 2012 Annual Summary

Summary The present report describes one possible way to correct radiometric measurements of the SSM/I (Special Sensor Microwave Imager) at 85.5 GHz f

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 5 August 2013

Climate reanalysis and reforecast needs: An Ocean Perspective

Evaluation of the sea ice forecast at DMI

ANNUAL CLIMATE REPORT 2016 SRI LANKA

Indonesian seas Numerical Assessment of the Coastal Environment (IndoNACE) Executive Summary

Whither Arctic sea ice? A clear signal of decline regionally, seasonally and extending beyond the satellite record

Regional Sea Ice Outlook for Greenland Sea and Barents Sea - based on data until the end of May 2013

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 15 July 2013

UPDATE OF REGIONAL WEATHER AND SMOKE HAZE (December 2017)

Some NOAA Products that Address PSTG Satellite Observing Requirements. Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Madison, Wisconsin USA

ICE DRIFT IN THE FRAM STRAIT FROM ENVISAT ASAR DATA

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

Climate Outlook and Review

SEPTEMBER 2013 REVIEW

Distribution and Variability of Icebergs in the Eastern Davis Strait 63 N to 68 N

Determine the trend for time series data

This is version v0.2 of this report issued together with the SIT and SIV data sets at the ICDC ESA-CCI- Projekt web page

KING EDWARD POINT OBSERVATORY MAGNETIC DATA

2018 Annual Review of Availability Assessment Hours

Sea Ice Concentration Climate Data Record Validation Report

Correction to Evaluation of the simulation of the annual cycle of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice coverages by 11 major global climate models

Champaign-Urbana 2001 Annual Weather Summary

Half-Yearly Operations Report

The Climate of Payne County

Ice and Ocean Mooring Data Statistics from Barrow Strait, the Central Section of the NW Passage in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago

Life Cycle of Convective Systems over Western Colombia

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 23 April 2012

Polar Portal Season Report 2016

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

QUALITY INFORMATION DOCUMENT For Arctic Ice Extent Indicator. ARC_SEAICE_INDEX_002

The Climate of Murray County

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2017

Additional Wind and Stability Observations at S6mastaoageroi in Reyoarfiorour Il

Road Weather Modelling System: Verification for Road Weather Season

Seasonal Variations of Sea Ice Extent in the Davis Strait-Labrador Sea Area and Relationships with Synoptic-Scale Atmospheric Circulation

The Climate of Texas County

Climatic Conditions Around Greenland 1995

1.4j interpret simple shadow stick data to determine local noon and observer s longitude

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

1. Introduction. 2. Verification of the 2010 forecasts. Research Brief 2011/ February 2011

NatGasWeather.com Daily Report

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 25 February 2013

The Climate of Marshall County

SURFACE TEMPERATURE ANOMALIES IN THE CENTRAL NORTH PACIFIC, JANUARY 1957-MAY 1958

Investigation of Arctic ice cover variance using XX century historical ice charts information and last decades microwave data

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING. November 16, 2018 Rick Thoman Alaska Center for Climate Assessment and Policy

KING EDWARD POINT OBSERVATORY MAGNETIC DATA

Multivariate Regression Model Results

Sea Ice Motion: Physics and Observations Ron Kwok Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA

A summary of the weather year based on data from the Zumwalt weather station

Transcription:

Ocean & Sea Ice SAF Validation of ice products January 2002 - March 2005 Version 1.1 May 2005 Morten Lind, Keld Q. Hansen, Søren Andersen

1 INTRODUCTION... 3 2 PRODUCTS VALIDATION METHODS... 3 3 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GREENLAND SEA ICE COVER 2002-2004... 4 4 VALIDATION STATISTICS... 5 4.1 DAILY VALIDATION OF THE SAF PRODUCTS... 5 Ice concentration... 5 Ice edge... 6 Ice type... 6 4.2 WEEKLY COMPARISON OF SAF PRODUCT WITH THE DMI ICE ANALYSES... 7 Ice concentration... 7 Ice edge... 9 5 COMMENTS TO VALIDATION STATS... 10 APPENDIX A... 13 APPENDIX B... 15 APPENDIX C... 21

1 Introduction Validation takes a prominent position in the definition of the Ocean & Sea Ice SAF products. For the sea ice products, quality assurance involves the comparison of the automatic SAF sea ice analyses to navigational ice analyses as well as weekly overview ice charts issued by the ice centres in Denmark and Norway (DMI and DNMI). For the background and the technical specifications of these products, please see the sea ice product manual available at http://www.osi-saf.org This report describes the quality of the O&SI SAF sea ice products covering the period 1. January 2002 1. April 2005 (51 months). 2 Products Validation methods For most advantageous utilisation of operational Ice Centre products and experience it was decided to validate the O&SI products west of 0º E/W in two separate ways: 1) Daily O&SI products compared visually / subjectively with the operationally prepared navigation ice charts or other relevant information using 3 categories, defined like: ICE CONCENTRATION: Good: SAF product average deviation better than 10%. Acceptable: Average deviation 10-30%. Bad: Average deviation more than 30% or major error ICE EDGE: Good: Acceptable: Bad: SAF product average deviation better than 10 km Average deviation 10-50 km Average deviation more than 50 km or major error ICE TYPE: Good: Acceptable: Bad: Determines the correct ice type in most ice areas Correct ice type in about 35-65% of ice covered areas Correct ice type in less than 35% of ice covered areas or major error

An example of a scheme used through the operational validation period are shown in Appendix A. 2) Once a week the O&SI products compared statistically to the weekly DMI ice analysis for the entire Greenland area. The weekly ice analysis compile all available satellite data, including Radarsat SAR and NOAA-AVHRR for a weekly reference date at 12 UTC (± 24 hours). No additional ice products are believed to have a better accuracy compared with coverage. The Greenland weekly ice analysis for operational use is available at http://www.dmi.dk/dmi/index/gronland/iskort.htm All ice analyses used for validation are available in the DMI archives. The resolution of the data grid extracted from the weekly analysis and the O&SI SAF products is 10 km. There were a few events of data errors and technical problems causing minor data delivery break downs, however these events did not disturb the overall results of the validation. 3 General characteristics of the Greenland sea ice cover 2002-2005 Winter 2001/02 Greenland West Greenland South Greenland East Normal freeze-up (normal ice cover through the ice season) Late arrival of MY-ice from north Summer 2002 Early break-up (2-4 weeks) MY ice clearance in early August (normal) Winter 2002/03 Late Freeze-up (2-3 weeks) (less than normal ice cover through the ice season) Very late arrival of MY-ice from north Summer 2003 Early break-up (2-4 weeks) MY ice clearance in late June (5-6 weeks earlier than normal Winter 2003/04 Late Freeze-up (2-3 weeks) (less than normal ice cover through the ice season) Normal arrival of MY-ice from north Summer 2004 Early break-up (2-4 weeks) MY ice clearance in late August (3 weeks later than normal) Normal or slightly lighter than normal MY ice retreat to 79ºN (record low, normal 70ºN) Normal or slightly lighter than normal MY ice retreat to 74ºN (lighter than normal) Normal or slightly lighter than normal MY ice retreat to 74ºN (lighter than normal) Fall 2004 Freeze up close to normal No MY ice MY ice cover below normal Winter 2004/05 Less than normal ice cover throughout the ice season Very late arrival of MY-ice from north (app. 3 months) In general lighter ice cover than normal, but due to wind conditions ice cover above normal in the Denmark Strait inbetween Greenland and Iceland

4 Validation statistics 4.1 Daily validation of the SAF products The following three figures summarise the result of the daily validation for the O&SI SAF ice concentration, ice edge and ice type products for the period of January 2002 - March 2005. Ice concentration Ice concentration (daily validation) fraction of IA's (%) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Jan 2002 Mar 2002 May 2002 July 2002 Sep 2002 Nov 2002 Jan 2003 Mar 2003 May 2003 July 2003 Sep 2003 Nov 2003 Jan 2004 Mar 2004 May 2004 July 2004 Sep 2004 Nov 2004 Jan 2005 Mar 2005 Good (1/10) Acceptable (1-3/10) date Bad (>3/10) No data Figure Feil! Ukjent bryterargument.: Bar graph showing the daily validation of the SAF ice concentration product.

Ice edge Ice edge (daily validation) fraction of IA's (%) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Jan 2002 Mar 2002 May 2002 July 2002 Sep 2002 Nov 2002 Jan 2003 Mar 2003 May 2003 July 2003 Sep 2003 Nov 2003 Jan 2004 Mar 2004 May 2004 July 2004 Sep 2004 Nov 2004 Jan 2005 Mar 2005 date Good (1/10) Acceptable (1-3/10) Bad (>3/10) No data Figure Feil! Ukjent bryterargument.: Bar graph showing the daily validation of the SAF ice edge product. Ice type Ice type (daily validation) fraction of IA's (%) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Jan 2002 Mar 2002 May 2002 July 2002 Sep 2002 Nov 2002 Jan 2003 Mar 2003 May 2003 July 2003 Sep 2003 Nov 2003 Jan 2004 Mar 2004 May 2004 July 2004 Sep 2004 Nov 2004 Jan 2005 Mar 2005 Good Acceptable datebad No data

Figure Feil! Ukjent bryterargument.: Bar graph showing the daily validation of the SAF ice type product.

4.2 Weekly comparison of SAF product with the DMI ice analyses The following figures show the results of the weekly comparison between the SAF ice concentration/edge products and the weekly DMI ice analyses. The statistics that founds the basis for the following two figures can be found in appendix B. Ice concentration Sea Ice Concentration (weekly charts) 100 90 fraction of grid points (%) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 06-01-02 06-04-02 06-07-02 06-10-02 06-01-03 06-04-03 06-07-03 06-10-03 06-01-04 06-04-04 06-07-04 06-10-04 06-01-05 06-04-05 Match +/- 20 % Match +/- 10 % Figure Feil! Ukjent bryterargument.: Comparison between ice concentrations from the weekly DMI ice analysis and the SAF concentration product. 'Match +/- 10 %' corresponds to those gridpoints where concentration deviates within the range of +/-10 %. Each vertical line indicates one comparison. Situations where vertical lines are missing indicates missing DMI ice analyses.

Bias of ice concentration 15 10 bias (% ice concentration) 5 0-5 Water Ice Total -10-15 06-01-02 06-03-02 06-05-02 06-07-02 06-09-02 06-11-02 06-01-03 06-03-03 06-05-03 06-07-03 06-09-03 06-11-03 06-01-04 06-03-04 06-05-04 06-07-04 06-09-04 06-11-04 06-01-05 06-03-05 date Figure Feil! Ukjent bryterargument.: Bias of ice concentration for three categories, i.e. water, ice and both. No estimates are available before 1st January 2005. Std. dev. of ice concentration 20 15 std. dev. (% ice concentration) 10 Water Ice Total 5 0 06-01-02 06-03-02 06-05-02 06-07-02 06-09-02 06-11-02 06-01-03 06-03-03 06-05-03 06-07-03 06-09-03 06-11-03 06-01-04 06-03-04 06-05-04 06-07-04 06-09-04 06-11-04 06-01-05 06-03-05 date Figure Feil! Ukjent bryterargument.: Standard deviation of ice concentration for three categories: water, ice and total. No estimates available before 1st January 2005.

Ice edge Sea Ice Edge (weekly charts) 100 90 fraction of grid points (%) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 06-01-02 06-04-02 06-07-02 06-10-02 06-01-03 06-04-03 06-07-03 06-10-03 06-01-04 06-04-04 06-07-04 06-10-04 Match (ice-ice) SAF underestimates (water-ice) SAF overestimates (ice-water) 06-01-05 06-04-05 Figure Feil! Ukjent bryterargument.: Area graph showing the comparison between the weekly DMI ice analysis and the SAF edge product. 'SAF underestimates' means grid points where the SAF product indicated water and the DMI ice analysis indicated ice and vice versa for 'SAF overestimates'. Each vertical line indicates one weekly comparison.

5 Comments to validation stats Each of the three parameters, ice type, ice concentration and ice edge were validated individually but the ice type parameter is hard to evaluate due to lack of direct measurements of the sea ice thickness. Sea ice concentration On a weekly basis the O&SI SAF grid was compared with the related weekly ice analysis grid and the quantitative ice concentration match (number of grid points) ± 10% and ± 20% was determined (see Appendix C for an example of the weekly statistics). Outside the melt season the match ± 10% is generally 60-80% and for ± 20% it is 80-90%, see Figure Feil! Ukjent bryterargument.. In melt season, Mid-June to Early September the match decreases dramatically. Average Match, Summary ± 10% ± 20% Concentration, Oct-May 72% 84% Concentration, June-Sept 54% 69% Table Feil! Ukjent bryterargument.: The average no. of grid points that match within +/- 10% and +/- 20% on a seasonal basis. Predominately the SAF product underestimates the sea ice concentration Through the operational validation it was found that the concentration of Baffin Bay / Davis Strait sea ice is estimated better than for sea ice at the Greenland East coast. Sea ice edge Through the entire period the ice edge product proved high quality and stability, see Feil! Ukjent bryterargument. and Feil! Ukjent bryterargument.. From Figure Feil! Ukjent bryterargument. it is evident that underestimation and overestimation is of the same magnitude during winter time (October - May). This indicates that the bias is insignificant. During summer there is a bias towards underestimation, i.e. the SAF product tends to estimate water when ice analysis estimates ice. The match between the weekly ice analysis grid and SAF product grid is calculated as a fraction Number of matching grid points (ice-ice) matching grid points (ice-ice) + grid points(ice-water) + grid points(water-ice) The summary of the weekly statistics is shown in the table below Average Match, Summary IA Ice SAF Ice edge, Oct-May 93%

Ice edge, June-Sept 79% Table Feil! Ukjent bryterargument.: No. of grid points that matches ice in both the SAF edge product and the DMI ice analysis. Sea ice type The SAF product is generally able to classify the sea ice type (first year ice) correctly in Baffin Bay / Davis Strait but it underestimates the amount of multi-year ice in the East Greenland Current. However, the general sense of this product is that it does not give operational information on top of basic sea ice climatic knowledge.

Appendix

APPENDIX A DMI SAF Ice edge validation Month Date Good Acc Bad Comments Report to SAF manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30 31

APPENDIX B Ice edge IA SAF Concentration dato Ice_ice Ice-water water ice water water Match % Match ice >=20 exact10 exact20 <=20 Match 10% Match 20% 06-01 2002 16698 782 168 30126 98,0 94,6 8859 7580 12286 18 46,1 74,7 13-01 2002 14484 254 2285 29406 94,5 85,1 4618 9089 11878 82 65,9 86,1 20-01 2002 19208 529 392 29163 98,1 95,4 4403 13851 16588 230 74,9 89,7 27-01 2002 19978 650 233 28392 98,2 95,8 7690 11246 15939 133 59,0 83,6 03-02 2002 19388 527 215 28394 98,5 96,3 6277 12009 15707 231 64,9 84,8 10-02 2002 19371 516 601 28801 97,7 94,5 4398 13580 16015 494 73,5 86,7 17-02 2002 19864 1099 377 27915 97,0 93,1 6736 12486 16216 281 64,0 83,1 24-02 2002 20211 1602 134 27332 96,5 92,1 7377 12567 16769 374 61,9 82,5 03-03 2002 20473 798 828 27116 96,7 92,6 5932 13737 17239 117 69,4 87,1 10-03 2002 21463 696 276 26772 98,0 95,7 5003 15302 18617 364 74,0 90,1 17-03 2002 21707 713 243 26537 98,1 95,8 5509 14971 18663 310 72,0 89,8 24-03 2002 21911 529 308 26623 98,3 96,3 5005 15517 18274 361 74,3 87,5 31-03 2002 20446 469 300 28009 98,4 96,4 3345 15442 17323 619 79,6 89,3 07-04 2002 19972 341 515 28456 98,3 95,9 4413 13968 16538 404 74,4 88,0 15-04 2002 19633 340 840 28487 97,6 94,3 2834 15045 17202 646 81,2 92,9 21-04 2002 19472 308 575 29082 98,2 95,7 4343 13492 15873 435 73,8 86,9 28-04 2002 18816 948 687 28820 96,7 92,0 3390 14334 15900 594 78,3 86,8 05-05 2002 18427 452 748 29747 97,6 93,9 2117 14568 15932 753 83,5 91,4 12-05 2002 19089 499 670 29577 97,7 94,2 3235 14273 15985 794 78,0 87,3 19-05 2002 18887 704 481 29754 97,6 94,1 5425 12478 14879 472 67,9 81,0 26-05 2002 17262 529 845 31183 97,2 92,6 3593 12307 13964 533 74,9 85,0 02-06 2002 16750 863 663 31497 96,9 91,7 4278 11644 13095 457 71,1 80,0 09-06 2002 15935 1295 605 31615 96,2 89,3 5216 10449 12141 291 65,5 76,1 16-06 2002 15268 1247 649 32612 96,2 89,0 6813 8459 10827 130 54,9 70,3 23-06 2002 14479 1812 447 32956 95,5 86,5 6738 8001 10008 128 53,8 67,3 30-06 2002 12844 3064 306 33499 93,2 79,2 9070 5555 7223 130 37,6 49,0 07-07 2002 #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T 14-07 2002 9261 4354 239 34974 90,6 66,8 9087 3488 4976 0 27,7 39,6

21-07 2002 8258 6108 227 35178 87,3 56,6 9291 4007 4852 0 30,1 36,5 28-07 2002 6561 3857 637 40394 91,3 59,3 6991 2668 4514 53 27,5 46,5 04-08 2002 6450 1602 672 40971 95,4 73,9 4750 2754 4995 34 36,5 66,3 11-08 2002 6250 1437 595 41879 95,9 75,5 3571 3539 4802 82 49,2 66,8 18-08 2002 5713 1402 453 42649 96,3 75,5 6287 325 1348 10 4,9 20,4 25-08 2002 5649 2035 500 43245 95,1 69,0 4829 2344 4167 0 32,7 58,1 01-09 2002 5615 1212 520 44099 96,6 76,4 3472 2968 4154 51 45,7 64,0 08-09 2002 5856 546 630 44420 97,7 83,3 1624 4429 4960 34 72,8 81,5 15-09 2002 5868 705 616 44304 97,4 81,6 3207 3040 4463 66 48,2 70,7 22-09 2002 6269 597 684 43928 97,5 83,0 2328 4183 5470 40 63,9 83,5 29-09 2002 6745 192 587 43245 98,5 89,6 1344 5276 5873 70 78,9 87,8 06-10 2002 5834 44 623 43115 98,7 89,7 2646 2910 4063 73 51,7 72,2 13-10 2002 6210 66 525 42897 98,8 91,3 1946 4019 5168 59 66,7 85,8 20-10 2002 7429 205 547 42149 98,5 90,8 1497 5764 6551 59 78,7 89,5 27-10 2002 7916 134 1090 41231 97,6 86,6 815 6826 7179 65 88,6 93,2 03-11 2002 8953 340 638 39710 98,0 90,2 1286 7404 7962 80 84,4 90,8 10-11 2002 8831 609 851 39353 97,1 85,8 2874 5956 6831 68 66,9 76,8 17-11 2002 10571 259 547 38095 98,4 92,9 3063 6894 8131 268 67,4 79,5 24-11 2002 11996 142 692 36582 98,3 93,5 3041 8381 9609 27 73,2 83,9 01-12 2002 12586 471 511 35966 98,0 92,8 4618 7694 9443 22 62,4 76,6 08-12 2002 13238 481 689 35112 97,6 91,9 6443 6429 8767 14 49,9 68,0 15-12 2002 14459 110 995 33972 97,8 92,9 5823 7738 10642 52 56,8 78,2 22-12 2002 15449 309 432 32876 98,5 95,4 6629 8069 11909 13 54,8 80,9 29-12 2002 15127 408 582 33135 98,0 93,9 6043 8370 10847 0 58,1 75,3 05-01 2003 16477 358 794 31640 97,7 93,5 6327 9263 12350 12 59,4 79,2 12-01 2003 16678 672 378 31385 97,9 94,1 8425 7317 11533 75 46,3 72,9 19-01 2003 17946 313 697 30225 97,9 94,7 7592 9483 13586 21 55,5 79,5 26-01 2003 18040 554 306 29957 98,2 95,4 6415 10975 14628 64 62,9 83,8 02-02 2003 18022 586 516 29670 97,7 94,2 7745 9509 12572 54 54,9 72,6 09-02 2003 17782 442 490 30067 98,1 95,0 5076 11694 14210 25 69,6 84,6 16-02 2003 18140 762 411 29911 97,6 93,9 6709 10760 13848 24 61,5 79,2 23-02 2003 18859 371 428 29581 98,4 95,9 6417 11390 14873 0 64,0 83,5 02-03 2003 16588 238 655 29228 98,1 94,9 5438 10191 13506 219 64,3 85,2

09-03 2003 16893 558 655 29414 97,4 93,3 7632 8646 12325 62 52,9 75,4 16-03 2003 17444 1090 541 28467 96,6 91,4 8760 8607 12858 0 49,6 74,0 23-03 2003 17827 818 573 28248 97,1 92,8 7017 10532 14439 9 60,0 82,2 30-03 2003 22872 888 449 27931 97,4 94,5 6224 15276 18967 484 69,5 86,3 06-04 2003 22273 825 400 28644 97,7 94,8 6682 14375 17015 236 67,5 79,9 13-04 2003 21894 1210 464 28590 96,8 92,9 5803 15102 17440 519 70,5 81,4 20-04 2003 21587 1367 549 28628 96,3 91,8 8386 12446 15767 368 58,7 74,4 27-04 2003 #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T 04-05 2003 19355 479 2542 29754 94,2 86,5 3598 14434 16523 513 77,8 89,1 11-05 2003 19707 415 2276 29762 94,8 88,0 3013 14823 16545 756 79,7 89,0 18-05 2003 19985 785 1766 29562 95,1 88,7 3713 14573 16646 991 75,6 86,4 25-05 2003 20542 1380 554 29664 96,3 91,4 7310 12879 15207 244 63,0 74,4 01-06 2003 17215 583 616 31031 97,6 93,5 5940 10380 13080 191 62,9 79,2 08-06 2003 18024 1475 484 32163 96,2 90,2 7352 10534 12850 229 58,1 70,9 15-06 2003 16879 2407 434 32411 94,6 85,6 7174 10642 12529 118 59,3 69,9 22-06 2003 13458 2908 438 33743 93,4 80,1 7080 7672 9178 93 51,7 61,8 29-06 2003 12242 3724 279 34734 92,1 75,4 7158 7601 9166 254 50,6 61,1 06-07 2003 11954 2828 378 35597 93,7 78,9 8429 5055 8545 135 37,1 62,7 13-07 2003 10095 1733 324 37524 95,9 83,1 4938 5839 7875 14 54,1 73,0 20-07 2003 9476 4032 371 38151 91,5 68,3 6013 6442 7225 5 51,7 58,0 27-07 2003 8421 2272 370 39281 94,8 76,1 6656 3560 5854 2 34,8 57,3 03-08 2003 7969 2430 487 40833 94,4 73,2 7810 2110 4410 47 21,2 44,2 10-08 2003 7002 2535 556 41852 94,0 69,4 6366 2789 4293 0 30,5 46,9 17-08 2003 6258 2363 508 42060 94,4 68,6 5307 2904 3303 13 35,3 40,2 24-08 2003 6002 2643 898 42504 93,2 62,9 4669 3706 5798 14 44,2 69,1 31-08 2003 6803 1781 514 43033 95,6 74,8 3905 4350 5641 26 52,5 68,1 07-09 2003 6438 1419 559 43559 96,2 76,5 2688 4917 5623 3 64,6 73,9 14-09 2003 6576 1467 522 43528 96,2 76,8 3695 4054 5297 17 52,2 68,2 21-09 2003 7298 1063 548 43166 96,9 81,9 3278 4756 5885 8 59,1 73,2 28-09 2003 7979 773 668 42670 97,2 84,7 2964 5442 6546 2 64,7 77,9 05-10 2003 8436 524 634 42451 97,8 87,9 2754 5869 6482 16 67,9 75,0 12-10 2003 8474 218 968 42267 97,7 87,7 1866 6461 7005 0 77,6 84,1 19-10 2003 9581 228 785 41502 98,1 90,4 1847 7456 8306 19 80,0 89,1

26-10 2003 10069 259 969 40814 97,6 89,1 1582 8125 8846 29 83,5 90,9 02-11 2003 11329 754 636 39346 97,3 89,1 3030 8388 9034 21 73,3 79,0 09-11 2003 12521 486 666 38409 97,8 91,6 5112 6984 8564 34 57,6 70,6 16-11 2003 13499 507 686 37121 97,7 91,9 4558 8542 9897 27 65,1 75,4 23-11 2003 14408 562 652 36495 97,7 91,9 4539 9342 10893 101 66,8 77,9 30-11 2003 15196 335 645 35938 98,1 93,7 4637 9807 11437 39 67,7 79,0 07-12 2003 4732 148 393 3816 94,0 88,9 968 3035 3370 40 75,1 83,4 14-12 2003 18463 822 331 32520 97,8 94,0 3601 13823 15451 295 78,0 87,2 21-12 2003 17697 482 644 32269 97,8 93,8 4110 12667 14386 35 75,3 85,6 28-12 2003 19495 901 620 31091 97,1 92,5 4704 14115 15977 203 74,2 84,0 04-01 2004 19020 461 689 30878 97,7 94,1 3348 14469 15589 193 80,3 86,6 11-01 2004 19622 434 539 30966 98,1 95,1 3670 14644 15750 120 79,4 85,4 18-01 2004 19660 232 807 31415 98,0 94,8 3129 14689 15827 440 80,5 86,7 25-01 2004 19791 445 1012 30879 97,2 92,8 3109 15159 16176 265 81,8 87,3 01-02 2004 20556 947 227 30382 97,7 94,5 3880 15585 17315 340 78,7 87,4 08-02 2004 21283 477 643 29539 97,8 94,9 3698 16059 17506 191 80,5 87,8 15-02 2004 21395 722 356 28371 97,9 95,1 5142 14983 16486 189 73,8 81,2 22-02 2004 21798 753 613 28019 97,3 93,9 7306 13190 15392 135 63,9 74,6 29-02 2004 21232 519 494 28240 98,0 95,3 3301 16320 17250 288 82,0 86,6 07-03 2004 22968 295 565 28300 98,4 96,3 3558 17762 19311 237 82,4 89,6 14-03 2004 22151 720 850 28302 97,0 93,1 6193 14526 17164 192 69,5 82,1 21-03 2004 22520 1347 687 27244 96,1 91,5 7253 14933 17907 175 66,8 80,1 28-03 2004 22093 1325 547 27970 96,4 92,0 9031 12647 15440 59 58,2 71,0 04-04 2004 21120 842 941 28693 96,5 91,9 6315 13950 16105 56 68,7 79,3 11-04 2004 20349 1087 900 29733 96,2 90,7 3483 15992 17246 192 81,3 87,7 18-04 2004 19560 682 1301 30576 96,2 90,2 2288 15710 16581 561 84,6 89,3 25-04 2004 19490 698 845 31077 97,0 92,4 2967 14360 16188 1035 78,2 88,2 02-05 2004 19402 507 1003 31204 97,1 92,4 2433 14422 16237 1293 79,5 89,5 09-05 2004 18391 528 1125 32091 96,8 91,3 2228 13083 15353 2002 75,6 88,7 16-05 2004 18117 557 1271 32186 96,5 90,2 2056 13323 14232 1651 78,2 83,6 23-05 2004 16994 340 2014 32752 95,5 86,4 1849 13594 14265 338 86,1 90,4 30-05 2004 17224 811 1385 32686 95,8 87,8 3178 13019 14215 319 78,8 86,1 06-06 2004 16895 822 1484 32937 95,6 87,0 3058 12932 14118 156 80,1 87,4

13-06 2004 16285 1335 998 33021 95,5 86,8 4628 11416 13020 153 70,5 80,4 20-06 2004 15834 1721 614 33471 95,5 86,7 5470 10459 12448 114 65,2 77,6 27-06 2004 14904 931 706 35122 96,8 89,7 3699 10598 11990 245 72,9 82,5 04-07 2004 13543 1113 600 35536 96,6 88,3 5666 7413 9463 151 56,0 71,5 11-07 2004 13030 1815 485 36310 95,5 84,5 5939 7524 9988 70 55,6 73,8 18-07 2004 10920 3423 365 36930 92,7 73,6 7702 5278 8531 95 40,4 65,2 25-07 2004 9469 3839 342 38001 91,9 68,6 6858 5024 7656 85 42,0 64,0 01-08 2004 7919 3825 298 39596 92,0 64,9 6980 3729 6499 69 34,6 60,3 08-08 2004 6867 2647 450 41685 94,0 67,4 3255 5624 7239 56 62,9 81,0 15-08 2004 5116 1080 844 42145 96,1 68,9 1615 4202 4519 0 72,2 77,7 22-08 2004 5923 1607 334 43776 96,2 74,2 2402 4704 5774 14 66,1 81,1 29-08 2004 5726 801 381 44747 97,7 81,9 2031 4057 4837 0 66,6 79,5 05-09 2004 5373 1491 282 44293 96,6 74,2 1891 4602 5164 15 70,7 79,4 12-09 2004 5640 733 332 44539 97,9 83,3 1381 4685 5163 0 77,2 85,1 19-09 2004 5639 322 407 44914 98,6 87,8 1093 4511 5224 41 79,9 92,5 26-09 2004 5710 229 627 44658 98,3 85,6 642 4717 5409 227 84,5 96,8 03-10 2004 5915 41 510 44536 98,9 90,7 1035 4608 5091 17 81,4 90,0 10-10 2004 6932 456 412 43606 98,3 88,3 929 5886 6458 164 84,3 92,5 17-10 2004 8156 487 373 43302 98,4 90,0 1693 6110 6982 167 76,7 87,6 24-10 2004 9081 674 397 42265 98,0 89,0 1322 6793 7632 884 75,5 84,8 31-10 2004 9509 281 740 41904 98,1 89,6 1320 7609 8325 138 83,9 91,8 07-11 2004 12394 390 593 39041 98,1 92,3 3857 7918 8780 71 66,8 74,1 14-11 2004 14142 368 1131 36753 97,1 89,7 1997 11131 12655 381 82,4 93,7 21-11 2004 15938 130 857 35514 98,1 93,9 2636 12012 13422 67 81,6 91,2 28-11 2004 16925 351 465 34718 98,4 95,3 2353 13181 14210 251 83,5 90,0 05-12 2004 17002 176 748 34368 98,2 94,6 2328 13311 14255 61 84,8 90,8 12-12 2004 17214 622 689 33639 97,5 92,6 3331 12590 13952 439 77,0 85,3 19-12 2004 18774 381 625 32660 98,1 94,7 3030 14307 15628 146 81,8 89,4 26-12 2004 18667 1097 522 32140 96,9 91,8 3893 14127 15399 82 78,0 85,1 02-01 2005 19721 646 737 31355 97,4 93,2 2741 15570 16524 231 84,0 89,1 09-01 2005 19833 260 664 31437 98,2 95,4 2219 15019 16287 609 84,2 91,3 16-01 2005 17397 134 675 31012 98,4 95,4 1471 13937 14598 304 88,7 92,9 23-01 2005 20392 235 607 30573 98,4 95,9 2215 15597 16976 531 85,0 92,6

30-01 2005 20322 994 703 30097 96,7 92,0 3037 8648 10210 532 70,8 83,6 06-02 2005 21391 328 995 29213 97,5 93,9 2523 11076 12821 891 76,4 88,5 13-02 2005 20622 636 438 30082 97,9 94,9 4534 14720 16392 165 75,8 84,4 20-02 2005 21412 702 375 29734 97,9 95,1 2881 5381 7046 960 58,3 76,4 27-02 2005 #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T 06-03 2005 17104 907 233 27560 97,5 93,7 4579 13129 15075 214 73,3 84,1 13-03 2005 17910 666 336 28069 97,9 94,6 3689 12650 14381 295 76,0 86,5 20-03 2005 #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T #I/T 27-03 2005 17911 465 408 28237 98,1 95,2 2204 8931 9837 248 78,5 86,4

APPENDIX C Example of the weekly statistics from the comparison of the SAF ice edge and ice concentration product with the DMI ice analysis. Reading IA Ice concentration comparison Importing SAF CT field Performing analysis Error from IA range IA NP <-20% >-20% >-10% exact <+10% <+20% >+20% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0-0 36423 1 0 0 96 2 1 1 0-10 43 47 0 0 0 0 35 19 10-30 3 33 0 0 0 0 0 67 30-50 96 3 1 23 55 16 2 0 50-70 569 89 11 1 0 0 0 0 70-90 1337 14 5 9 58 15 0 0 90-90 4651 43 20 23 0 13 0 0 90-100 6183 5 4 15 72 4 0 0 100-100 272 71 11 9 8 1 0 0 Total: 49577 7 3 4 81 4 1 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ice edge comparison Importing SAF CT field Performing analysis Ice edge stats IA\SAF Ice Water ------------------------------ Ice 13499 507 Water 686 37121 ------------------------------