arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 11 Nov 2005

Similar documents
Qutrit Entanglement. Abstract

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation

Lie Algebra and Representation of SU(4)

PHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix

Notes on SU(3) and the Quark Model

Physics 129B, Winter 2010 Problem Set 4 Solution

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 3

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Lie Theory in Particle Physics

Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 2

Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 768 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators.

Kähler configurations of points

2. Introduction to quantum mechanics

The following definition is fundamental.

Algebraic Theory of Entanglement

Qudit Entanglement. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA. The University of Queensland, QLD 4072 Australia.

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 30 Dec 2018

Linear Algebra Massoud Malek

Geometry of the Special Unitary Group

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 26 Mar 1998

Linear Algebra using Dirac Notation: Pt. 2

Ph 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006

Supplementary Information

1 More on the Bloch Sphere (10 points)

Spectral Theorem for Self-adjoint Linear Operators

Is Weak Pseudo-Hermiticity Weaker than Pseudo-Hermiticity?

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 16 Oct 2006

Part IA. Vectors and Matrices. Year

Algebra I Fall 2007

CLASSICAL GROUPS DAVID VOGAN

arxiv: v2 [math-ph] 2 Jun 2014

Quantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects

The Solovay-Kitaev theorem

Introduction to Group Theory

Quantum Entanglement: Detection, Classification, and Quantification

The quantum state as a vector

Group Theory - QMII 2017

The tilde map can be rephased as we please; i.e.,

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Some Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Structured Hadamard matrices and quantum information

Notes on basis changes and matrix diagonalization

Density Matrices and Geometric Phases for n-state Systems

4. Killing form, root space inner product, and commutation relations * version 1.5 *

CHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups

Categories and Quantum Informatics: Hilbert spaces

Particles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Lecture 1: Systems of linear equations and their solutions

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 27 Jul 2005

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: so(2n), so(2n+1), symplectic algebra sp(2n)

Linear Algebra Review

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule

Journal Club: Brief Introduction to Tensor Network

Lecture 3: Hilbert spaces, tensor products

Lecture 19 (Nov. 15, 2017)

Qubits vs. bits: a naive account A bit: admits two values 0 and 1, admits arbitrary transformations. is freely readable,

Physics 239/139 Spring 2018 Assignment 6

Topics in Representation Theory: Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and the Exponential Map

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 24 Aug 2006

Functional determinants

Pseudo-Hermiticity and Generalized P T- and CP T-Symmetries

Linear Algebra Review. Vectors

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2004 Assignment 3

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 17 Jun 1996

Degenerate Perturbation Theory

Valerio Cappellini. References

Introduction to quantum information processing

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 24 May 2011

Diagonalizing Matrices

Lecture If two operators A, B commute then they have same set of eigenkets.

Unitary Transformations in 3-D Vector Representation of Qutrit States

Operator Quantum Error Correcting Codes

ELEMENTARY MATRIX ALGEBRA

Killing Vector Fields of Constant Length on Riemannian Normal Homogeneous Spaces

Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 1

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

The Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology

Math Linear Algebra II. 1. Inner Products and Norms

Linear Algebra (Review) Volker Tresp 2018

Topological Qubit Design and Leakage

In a D-dimensional Hilbert space, a symmetric informationally complete POVM is a

Chapter 2 The Density Matrix

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

Physics 557 Lecture 5

DECAY OF SINGLET CONVERSION PROBABILITY IN ONE DIMENSIONAL QUANTUM NETWORKS

Group Theory in Particle Physics

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

An Introduction to Quantum Computation and Quantum Information

Review of Linear Algebra

INSTITUT FOURIER. Quantum correlations and Geometry. Dominique Spehner

G : Quantum Mechanics II

Short Course in Quantum Information Lecture 2

Quantum Entanglement and the Bell Matrix

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 23 Mar 2001

Transcription:

On the SU() Parametrization of Qutrits arxiv:quant-ph/5v Nov 5 A. T. Bölükbaşı, T. Dereli Department of Physics, Koç University 445 Sarıyer, İstanbul, Turkey Abstract Parametrization of qutrits on the complex projective plane CP = SU()/U() is given explicitly. A set of constraints that characterize mixed state density matrices is found. Many recent ideas of quantum information theory are based on the notion of qubits. A qubit may be represented by a point on the Poincaré sphere S that is homeomorhic to the complex projective line H () = CP = SU()/U(). A similar parametrization in the case of higher dimensional quantum systems is desirable both from theoretical [] and technical points of view [], []. A qutrit may be represented by a point on the complex projective plane H () = CP = SU()/U(). Such a representation is given explicitly in terms of Gell-Mann matrices [4]. We determine a set of constraints that characterize mixed states of qutrits below. A qutrit ψ >= α > +α > +α >where α,α,α C, α + α + α =, is a state vector in the Hilbert space of states H () of a -level system. It is spanned by an orthonormal basis { >, >, >} which in matrix notation reads >, >, > Therefore ψ > α α α C R 6. Since α + α + α = and since ψ > is determined up to a multiplicative phase factor, dimh () = 4. Paper presented at The th Central European Workshop on Quantum Optics, 6-9 June 5, Ankara, Turkey. E.mail: abolukbasi@ku.edu.tr E.mail: tdereli@ku.edu.tr

Any density matrix can be written as ρ = (I + n λ) where nisareal8-vector, andcomponentsof λarethe(hermitian, traceless) Gell-Mann matrices i λ =, λ = i, λ 4 =, λ 5 = i i λ =, λ 6 =, λ 8 =, λ 7 = The product of two Gell-Mann matrices is given by i i, λ j λ k = δ jk + l d jkl λ l +i l f jkl λ l where j,k =,,...,8. The f-symbols (structure constants of the Lie algebra su()) are totally anti-symmetric : f =,f 458 = f 678 =, f 47 = f 46 = f 57 = f 45 = f 56 = f 67 =, and the d-symbols are totally symmetric: d 8 = d 8 = d 8 = d 888 =, d 448 = d 558 = d 668 = d 778 =, d 46 = d 57 = d 47 = d 56 = d 44 = d 55 = d 66 = d 77 =. Given two real 8-vectors a and b, we define their Euclidean inner product a b = k a k b k,

skew-symmetric vector -product ( a b) j = k,l f jkl a k b l, and symmetric vector -product ( a b) j = k,l d jkl a k b l. The pure states that satisfy ρ = ρ are therefore characterized by n = and n n = n. Suppose that ρ = (I + n λ) is the density matrix of a mixed state. It is Hermitian, positive with trace equal to. Therefore all the eigenvalues x,x,x arepositiveandaddtoone: x +x +x =. TheCayley-Hamilton equation satisfied by ρ reads ρ ρ +(x x +x x +x x )ρ x x x I =. The following inequalities hold: x x +x x +x x, 7 x x x. Starting from these, a straightforward computation shows that the necessary and sufficient conditions for ρ = (I + n λ) to be a density matrix of a mixed state are given by n and n n ( n n). An arbitrary diagonal density matrix of a -level system will be ρ = (I + (n λ +n 8 λ 8 )). In this case, the mixed-state density matrix constraints reduce to n +n 8 and n 8 6n n 8 +n +n 8. The region in the n n 8 -plane where both the constraints are satisfied is bound by an equilateral triangle with vertices at the points (n,n 8 ) R = (, ),(n,n 8 ) B = (, ),

(n,n 8 ) G = (, ). Vertices of the above triangle correspond to three mutually orthogonal purestates. We labeled them Red, Blue, Green in analogy with colored quarks []. In fact two pure-state vectors ψ > and ψ > are orthogonal if and only if < ψ ψ >=, so that Tr(ρρ ) =. This implies n n =. Then arccos( n n ) = ± π. This is equal to the geodesic distance between two orthogonal pure-states as measured by the standard Fubini-Study metric on CP. Points on the edges of the triangle correspond to mixing of two orthogonal pure-states of qutrits. In particular, at mid-points where bi-sectors intersect with the edges we have (n,n 8 ) C = (, ) (n,n 8 ) A = (,(n,n 8 ) B = (, 4 ) 4, 4 ), 4

Triply mixed-states correspond to points inside the triangle. In particular the origin (n,n 8 ) O = (,) corresponds to the maximally mixed state. For -level systems, the orbit of any diagonal density matrix of qubits ρ = ( ) +n (,,n n ) under the action of the unitary group SU(), ρ UρU where U SU() (i.e. adjoint representation of SU(), which is SO() applied on n ) sweeps the whole Poincaré sphere S. Adjoint representation Ad of a given U SU() is explicitly Ad(U) ij = Tr(σ iuσ j U ) SO(), so that n j Ad(U) jk n k. In a similar way, for -level systems the orbit of each point (n,n 8 ) of the above triangle under the unitary action of SU() (i.e. adjoint representation of SU()) will provide a generalization of the Poincaré sphere to -level systems. Adjoint representation Ad of a given U SU() is found as follows: so that Ad(U) ij = Tr(λ iuλ j U ) SO(8) n j Ad(U) jk n k. In fact Ad(SU()) is an 8-parameter subgroup of the 8-parameter rotation group SO(8). We also consider the entropy of mixing of ρ defined as E(ρ) = x log (x ) x log (x ) x log (x ). Since in diagonal form ρ = + n +n 8 n +n 8 5 n 8,

the entropy of mixing of ρ becomes E(ρ) = ( + n +n 8 )log ( + n +n 8 ) ( n +n 8 ( n 8 )log ( n 8 ). The equi-mixing curves in the n n 8 -plane are shown on the following diagram: )log ( n +n 8 ) Acknowledgement We thank Professor A. Shumovsky for bringing Ref.[] to our attention and Professor V. Manko for comments. References [] C. M. Caves, G. J. Milburn, Opt. Commun. 79, 49 () [] A. V. Burlankov, D. N.Klyshko, JETP Letters 69, 89 (999) [] M. V. Chekova, L. A. Krivitsky, S. P. Kulik, G. A. Maslennikov, Phys. Rev. A7, 58 (4) [4] G. Khanna, S. Mukhopadhyay, R. Simon, N. Mukunda, Ann. Phys. 5,55 (997) 6