Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Similar documents
Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

Analysis of a single pile settlement

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Spread footing settlement and rotation analysis

Clayey sand (SC)

Axially Loaded Piles

Stress Analysis Lecture 3 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

Entrance exam Master Course

Deep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

T2. VIERENDEEL STRUCTURES

Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000

Assignment 1 - actions

Creation and modification of a geological model Program: Stratigraphy

Rock slope rock wedge stability

Module 6. Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

Creation and modification of a geological model Program: Stratigraphy

ANALYSES OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION BASED ON VERTICAL LOAD TESTS OF DISPLACEMENT PILES

EN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.

Analysis of Pile Foundation Subjected to Lateral and Vertical Loads

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership

OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises. CONTENTS

O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix)

Chapter 5 Torsion STRUCTURAL MECHANICS: CE203. Notes are based on Mechanics of Materials: by R. C. Hibbeler, 7th Edition, Pearson

GATE SOLUTIONS E N G I N E E R I N G

Erratum. Chapter 4 - Earth and water pressure 26. Chapter Area loads. q a. c+d ϕ'/2. Piling Handbook, 9th edition (2016)

Mechanics of Solids. Mechanics Of Solids. Suraj kr. Ray Department of Civil Engineering

2D Liquefaction Analysis for Bridge Abutment

Evolution Group 7 - Pile Design

cyclic loading in Germany

RELIABILITY ASPECTS OF DESIGN OF COMBINED PILED-RAFT FOUNDATIONS (CPRF)

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

Influence of micropile inclination on the performance of a micropile network

University of Sheffield The development of finite elements for 3D structural analysis in fire

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

Dynamic Response of EPS Blocks /soil Sandwiched Wall/embankment

Mechanical Behaviors of Cylindrical Retaining Structures in Ultra-deep Excavation

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS

EXTENDED ABSTRACT. Combined Pile Raft Foundation

Talić Z. et al: Geotechnical characteristics... Archives for Technical Sciences 2014, 11(1), 33-39

Finite Element Investigation of the Interaction between a Pile and a Soft Soil focussing on Negative Skin Friction

Copyright. magazine. bearing capacity and modulus of subgrade reaction? Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (Ks)

Leaf Spring (Material, Contact, geometric nonlinearity)

1.3 Working temperature T 200,0 1.4 Working environment. F... Guided seating. Light service. Cold formed springs. Music wire ASTM A228

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Seismic design of bridges

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA SCIENCE FOR TECHNICIANS OUTCOME 1 - STATIC AND DYNAMIC FORCES TUTORIAL 3 STRESS AND STRAIN

EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS with SAP2000

Structural Analysis I Chapter 4 - Torsion TORSION

OP-023. INTERPRETATION OF INSTRUMENTED TEST PILE RESULT

BOOK OF COURSE WORKS ON STRENGTH OF MATERIALS FOR THE 2 ND YEAR STUDENTS OF THE UACEG

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

THEME IS FIRST OCCURANCE OF YIELDING THE LIMIT?

Software Verification

A Pile Pull Out Test

Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Recent Load History on the Behaviour of Steel Piles under Horizontal Loading

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Bored piles in clay and Codes of Practice. Malcolm Bolton

PLAXIS 3D FOUNDATION Validation Manual. version 1.5

1. A pure shear deformation is shown. The volume is unchanged. What is the strain tensor.

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Engineering Science OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Monopile design

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design

UNIT 1 STRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS 1. Define stress. When an external force acts on a body, it undergoes deformation.

Project data Project name Project number Author Description Date 26/04/2017 Design code AISC dome anchor. Material.

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt

SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA

Chapter a. Spring constant, k : The change in the force per unit length change of the spring. b. Coefficient of subgrade reaction, k:

Appraisal of Soil Nailing Design

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1

Improving fire resistance of existing concrete slabs by concrete topping

Fig Example 8-4. Rotor shaft of a helicopter (combined torsion and axial force).

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING )

Dynamic behavior of turbine foundation considering full interaction among facility, structure and soil

Regupol. Vibration

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Worked examples. Dr. Bernd Schuppener German Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute, Karlsruhe Past Chairman of CEN TC250/SC 7

Regufoam. Vibration 270 Plus.

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

Software Verification

STATICALLY INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES

Piles and Pile Foundations

Lesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

B.Tech. Civil (Construction Management) / B.Tech. Civil (Water Resources Engineering)

Dynamics Manual. Version 7

Gapping effects on the lateral stiffness of piles in cohesive soil

Software Verification

Transcription:

Engineering manual No. 36 Update 02/2018 Verification of a Micropile Foundation Program: File: Pile Group Demo_manual_en_36.gsp The objective of this engineering manual is to explain the application of the GEO5 Pile Group program for verification of micropile foundation. Assignment: Analyse a micropile foundation under a tower crane according to EN 1997 DA2. In Figure 1, a scheme of the micropile foundation is shown. The coordinates and the inclination of individual micropiles are shown in Table 1. The micropiles are made of steel (S355) and the TK 108 x 20 profile is used. The overall length of the micropiles is 7.0 m and they are divided into three parts. The bottom part is the root with diameter of 0.3 m and the length of 3.0 m. The next part is the free length of the micropile with length 3.0 m and the last part is connection micropile with a pile cap of length 1.0 m. The geological profile of this task is shown in Table 2. The ground water is not considered. To calculate 3 the vertical springs along the root of a micropile, the Shear modulus of reaction k v 45.00 MN/ m, which will be constant along the root of micropile, and the stiffness of Spring on the base k p 5.00 MN/ m will be used. The average limit skin friction for the verification of the root of the micropiles was determined by a geological survey to be q sav 280. 00 kpa. Figure 1 Scheme of the micropile foundation Micropile No. X Y Inclination [m] [m] [ ] 1-0.77-1.57 0.00 1

2 0.77-1.57 0.00 3-1.57-0.77 0.00 4 0.00-0.92 0.00 5 1.57-0.77 0.00 6-0.92 0.00 0.00 7 0.92 0.00 0.00 8-1.57 0.77 0.00 9 0.00 0.92 0.00 10 1.57 0.77 0.00 11-0.77 1.57 0.00 12 0.77 1.57 0.00 13-1.57-1.57 15.00 14 1.57-1.57 15.00 15 1.57 1.57 15.00 16-1.57 1.57 15.00 Table 1 Coordinates and inclination of the micropiles Soil Soil 1 (CL, CI) Soil 2 (ML, MI) Soil 3 (G-F) Profile [m] [kn/m 3 ] ef [ ] c ef [kpa] [-] E def [MPa] k [MN/m 3 ] 0.00 1.90 21.00 19.00 30.00 0.40 10.00 150.00 9.50 1.90 3.10 20.00 21.00 12.00 0.40 4.00 200.00 10.50 3.10 4.90 19.00 35.50 0.00 0.25 95.00 250.00 12.75 β [ ] Soil 4 (GP) 4.90 6.50 20.00 38.50 0.00 0.20 210.00 320.00 19.25 Soil 5 (CH, CV, CE) > 6.50 20.50 15.00 5.00 0.42 3.00 60.00 7.50 Table 2 Soil properties characteristic effective values The service load used to calculate the rotation and settlement of the pile cap is shown in Table 3. The design load is shown in Table 4. The loads are considered in the middle of the top side of the pile cap. The design load from self-weight of the pile cap with dimensions 4.0 m x 4.0 m x 1.2 m is calculated automatically. 2

Load N [kn] M x [knm] M y [knm] H x [kn] Value 609.00 2111.00 2111.00 47.00 47.00 Table 3 Service load H y [kn] Load N [kn] M x [knm] M y [knm] H x [kn] Value 822.00 2850.00 2850.00 63.00 63.00 Table 4 Design load H y [kn] Solution: To solve this problem, we will use the GEO5 Pile Group program. We will analyse the effect of the load on each micropile in the group and then we will assess the most loaded micropile. In the text below we will describe the solution to this task step by step. We will analyse the micropile group using the so-called Spring Method, which models individual micropiles as beams on an elastic bed. Each micropile is internally divided into ten sections, for which the values of the horizontal and vertical springs are computed. The pile cap (base slab) is considered to be infinitely stiff. The solution itself is carried out using the deformation variant of the Finite Element Method. In the Settings frame we will click on the Setting list button and then choose the Standard EN 1997 DA2 calculation settings. Dialog window Settings list The next step is changing the analysis type to Spring method micropiles. We will consider the connection of the micropiles to the pile cap to be fixed. The last step in this frame is setting the Modulus of subsoil reaction, which will describe the behavior of the micropiles in the horizontal 3

direction. In this case, the Linear modulus of subsoil reaction is considered (it will be calculated according to the Bowles s method). For more information visit HELP (F1 key). Frame Settings In the Structure frame we will choose the general shape option for the top view of the pile cap. The cap overlap with value o 0. 38 m will be set. Now, we can add each micropile according to Table 1 by clicking on Add button. Frame Structure 4

pile cap. Note: The cap overlap o is the distance from the outer edge of the micropile to the edge of After clicking on the add button, the dialog window New point will appear. In this window we will input coordinates x and y and the inclination of the micropile. The coordinates and the inclination of each micropile are shown in Table 1. A new micropile will be added by clicking on the add button. Dialog window New point (micropile no. 16) The profile of the micropile will be defined in the Catalogue of profiles. In the section Profile class we will choose the Seamless tube circular cross-section and then in the section Profile the profile TK 108x20 will be chosen. Dialog window Catalogue of profiles 5

In the Geometry frame will be defined Depth from ground surface = 0.00 m, Thickness of pile cap t 1. 20 m, Length of micropiles l 6. 00 m, Diameter of root d r 0. 30 m, Root length l r 3. 00 m and finally it is possible to define the Resistance of the foundation soil but it won t be considered in this case. Therefore Resistance of foundation soil R 0. 00 kpa. Frame Geometry Note: The resistance of the foundation soil is very important and has a big influence on the results of the analysis. The magnitude of the resistance of the foundation subsoil depends on the type of the subsoil, the process of building the structure (new structure, reconstruction) and the history of loading. The force N R A R is subtracted from the entered load in all cases. In the Material frame the material properties of the structure are defined. For a pile cap, 3 the defined unit weight ( 23.00 kn/ m ) and concrete class C20/25 (for dimensioning) are set and for the micropiles the structural steel class EN 10210 1: S355 is set. The material classes for concrete and structural steel are available by clicking on the Catalog button. 6

Frame Material In the Load frame the loads will be added. The values of the service load are shown in Table 3 and the values of the design load are shown in Table 4. Frame Load 7

The geological profile is defined in the Profile, Soils and Assign frames. In the Profile frame, you will set the range of layers of the geological profile. In the Soils frame, you will define the soils and the last step is done in the Assign frame, where the soils are assigned to various layers of the geological profile. The geological profile with properties of each soil is shown in Table 2. In the dialog window Add new soils it is necessary to input values for the Determining modulus of subsoil reaction. The representative range of values of Coefficient k and the formula for determining the angle of dispersion are shown in HELP (F1 key), in the topic of Linear Modulus of Subsoil Reaction. Dialog window Add new soils 8

Frame Assign In the frame Vertical springs the behaviour of a micropile in the vertical direction is defined. The load from a micropile is transmitted to the soil through the base and the skin of the root. Frame Vertical springs 9

In the Analysis frame, the calculation of the task is done. The results (internal forces, displacements, etc.) are displayed for one or for of the all micropiles. On the right side of the window, the results for maximum internal forces (from all load cases) and results for maximum displacements (only from service load cases) of the whole structure are shown. In the figure below you can see the results for micropile no. 16. Frame Analysis The results of the analysis for initial settings (for maximum deformation) are as follows: - Maximum settlement 15.8 mm - Maximum horizontal displacement of a pile cap 10.6 mm - Maximum rotation of a pile cap 2.6E 01 In the Dimensioning frame the internal forces from the selected load case or the envelope of load cases are shown. The results can also be shown for any pile. The total internal forces are equal to the resultant forces calculated from the X and Y components. The following figure shows the internal forces from the envelope of load cases for all micropiles. 10

Frame Dimensioning To analyse the micropile cross-section and its root, it is necessary to open the GEO5 Micropile program by the clicking on the Bearing capacity frame. All results and data are automatically imported to this program. The verification of the steel cross-section of a micropile is in the Section verification frame. The results for the most loaded micropile are automatically calculated. Corrosion is not considered in this case because our micropile foundation is not a permanent structure. Boundary conditions are considered as: hinge fixed. Internal stability check: N crd 3646.39 kn Nmax 397. 09 kn The internal stability of the micropile section is SATISFACTORY Verification of the coupled section bearing capacity: f y, d 236.67 MPa s 171. 96 MPa The coupled section of the micropile is SATISFACTORY 11

Frame Section verification The verification of the root bearing capacity of the micropile is done in the frame Root Verification. The verification is done according to Lizzi theory and average skin friction is set as q sav=280 kpa. Note: The method of analysis for the verification of root bearing capacity can be changed in the Settings frame by editing the settings for Micropile. Verification of a compressive micropile: R s 633.35 kn Nmax 397. 09 kn -Shaft resistance R d 422.23 kn Nmax 397. 09 kn -Bearing capacity of the micropile root The bearing capacity of the compressive micropile is SATISFACTORY Verification of tensile micropile: R s 633.35 kn Nmax 213. 26 kn -Shaft resistance R d 422.23 kn Nmax 213. 26 kn -Bearing capacity of the micropile root The bearing capacity of the tensile micropile is SATISFACTORY 12

Frame Root Verification figure. The last step is saving the results by clicking the Exit and save button as shown in the previous Conclusion: The values for maximum settlement, maximum horizontal displacements and rotation of pile cap are within the allowable limits. The design of a micropile TK 108/20 made of structural steel EN 10210-1: S355 and its root are satisfactory according to EN 1997 DA2. 13