A Description of the Initial Value Formulation of. Mark Miller, Syracuse University. October 10, 1994

Similar documents
From An Apple To Black Holes Gravity in General Relativity

General Relativity. Einstein s Theory of Gravitation. March R. H. Gowdy (VCU) General Relativity 03/06 1 / 26

has a lot of good notes on GR and links to other pages. General Relativity Philosophy of general relativity.

Collapse of Kaluza-Klein Bubbles. Abstract. Kaluza-Klein theory admits \bubble" congurations, in which the

Cosmology on Simplicial Complexes

A873: Cosmology Course Notes. II. General Relativity

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 2. General Relativity

Review Special Relativity. February 3, Absolutes of Relativity. Key Ideas of Special Relativity. Path of Ball in a Moving Train

2 General Relativity. 2.1 Curved 2D and 3D space

carroll/notes/ has a lot of good notes on GR and links to other pages. General Relativity Philosophy of general

Curved Spacetime III Einstein's field equations

Initial-Value Problems in General Relativity

ASTR 200 : Lecture 30. More Gravity: Tides, GR, and Gravitational Waves

Inertial Frames. (These remarks are largely based on Rob DiSalle s entry on inertial frames in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

ASTR 200 : Lecture 31. More Gravity: Tides, GR, and Gravitational Waves

Non Linear Dynamics in Einstein-Friedman Equations

Class 16. Prof J. Kenney October 31, Relativity

Einstein Toolkit Workshop. Joshua Faber Apr

Black Holes. Jan Gutowski. King s College London

Introduction to Numerical Relativity I. Erik Schnetter, Pohang, July 2007

Classical Field Theory

Scott Hughes 12 May Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics Spring 2005

Chapter S3 Spacetime and Gravity Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter S3 Spacetime and Gravity. Agenda. Distinguishing Crackpots

Solving Einstein s Equation Numerically III

Scott A. Hughes, MIT SSI, 28 July The basic concepts and properties of black holes in general relativity

Astronomy 182: Origin and Evolution of the Universe

= m(v) X B = m(0) 0 + m(v) x B m(0) + m(v) u = dx B dt B. m + m(v) v. 2u 1 + v A u/c 2 = v = 1 + v2. c 2 = 0

7/5. Consequences of the principle of equivalence (#3) 1. Gravity is a manifestation of the curvature of space.

Lecture: Lorentz Invariant Dynamics

Dynamics of star clusters containing stellar mass black holes: 1. Introduction to Gravitational Waves

The interpretation is that gravity bends spacetime and that light follows the curvature of space.

Modern Physics notes Paul Fendley Lecture 35. Born, chapter III (most of which should be review for you), chapter VII

Geometric Modelling Summer 2016

Theory. V H Satheeshkumar. XXVII Texas Symposium, Dallas, TX December 8 13, 2013

DISCRETE SCALE RELATIVITY

BLACKHOLE WORMHOLE THEORY

The Schwarzschild Metric

Accelerated Observers

5.5 Energy-momentum tensor

Relativity. Class 16 Prof J. Kenney June 18, boss

Gravity and Spacetime: Why do things fall?

16. Einstein and General Relativistic Spacetimes

ASTR 200 : Lecture 21. Stellar mass Black Holes

carroll/notes/ has a lot of good notes on GR and links to other pages. General Relativity Philosophy of general

Ask class: what is the Minkowski spacetime in spherical coordinates? ds 2 = dt 2 +dr 2 +r 2 (dθ 2 +sin 2 θdφ 2 ). (1)

LIGHT SPEED CANNOT BE A UNIVERSAL CONSTANT

A brain teaser: The anthropic principle! Last lecture I said Is cosmology a science given that we only have one Universe? Weak anthropic principle: "T

Solving Einstein s Equations: PDE Issues

Relativity, Gravitation, and Cosmology

Curved spacetime and general covariance

Classical Oscilators in General Relativity

Lecture 9: Schwarzschild solution

Geometric inequalities for black holes

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Exploring Black Holes General Relativity and Astrophysics Spring 2003

Special Theory of Relativity Prof. Shiva Prasad Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 15 Momentum Energy Four Vector

Brane Gravity from Bulk Vector Field

Covariant Formulation of Electrodynamics

General Relativity and Gravity. Exam 2 Results. Equivalence principle. The Equivalence Principle. Experiment: throw a ball. Now throw some light

A non-strictly hyperbolic system for the Einstein equations with arbitrary lapse and shift

PHYM432 Relativity and Cosmology 17. Cosmology Robertson Walker Metric

The Laser-Interferometric Gravitational Compass

EXCISION TECHNIQUE IN CONSTRAINED FORMULATIONS OF EINSTEIN EQUATIONS

A100 Exploring the Universe: Black holes. Martin D. Weinberg UMass Astronomy

Classification theorem for the static and asymptotically flat Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton spacetimes possessing a photon sphere

GTR is founded on a Conceptual Mistake And hence Null and Void

The Problem of Slowing Clocks in Relativity Theory

Chapter 11. Special Relativity

Time-Dependent Statistical Mechanics 5. The classical atomic fluid, classical mechanics, and classical equilibrium statistical mechanics

Announcements. Lecture 6. General Relativity. From before. Space/Time - Energy/Momentum

Today in Astronomy 102: Einstein studies gravity

Lecture 23 (Gravitation, Potential Energy and Gauss s Law; Kepler s Laws) Physics Spring 2017 Douglas Fields

Pedagogical Strategy

General Relativity I - Geometry

Lecture: Principle of Equivalence

Relativity SPECIAL, GENERAL, AND COSMOLOGICAL SECOND EDITION. Wolfgang Rindler. Professor of Physics The University of Texas at Dallas

Physics 114A Introduction to Mechanics (without calculus)

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Physics 8.286: The Early Universe October 27, 2013 Prof. Alan Guth PROBLEM SET 6

Physics 209 Fall 2002 Notes 5 Thomas Precession

Orbital Motion in Schwarzschild Geometry

Inverse scattering technique in gravity

Einstein s Relativity and Black Holes

Syllabus. May 3, Special relativity 1. 2 Differential geometry 3

Lecture 10: General Relativity I

Figure 1: Doing work on a block by pushing it across the floor.

Lecture IX: Field equations, cosmological constant, and tides

2.1 Basics of the Relativistic Cosmology: Global Geometry and the Dynamics of the Universe Part I

1 The role of gravity The view of physics that is most generally accepted at the moment is that one can divide the discussion of the universe into

Today HW#4 pushed back to 8:00 am Thursday Exam #1 is on Thursday Feb. 11

THE INITIAL VALUE FORMULATION OF GENERAL RELATIVITY

Fundamental Cosmology: 4.General Relativistic Cosmology

1.4 LECTURE 4. Tensors and Vector Identities

LECTURE 3: SPACETIME AND GEOMETRY: AN INTRODUCTION TO SPECIAL RELATIVITY. AS204 February

Programming with General Relativity. Michael. C. Ryan

Research & Reviews: Journal of Pure and Applied Physics

PROBLEM SET 6 EXTRA CREDIT PROBLEM SET

Overview of Gravitational Radiation

PHYS 340 ( From Atoms to the Universe ): SECTION A

Relativity Discussion

Charge, geometry, and effective mass

Transcription:

A Description of the Initial Value Formulation of Vacuum General Relativity for the Non-Specialist 1 Mark Miller, Syracuse University October 10, 1994 1 Work supported by NSF ASC 93 18152/PHY 93 18152 (ARPA supplemented)

1 Introduction In any specialized scientic endeavor, the workers in that specic area develop their own language, or jargon, that can be confusing for the nonspecialist (and, at times, for the specialist, too!). This makes it dicult for scientists to \latch{on" to elds that are outside their area of expertise. General Relativity is certainly no exception. In light of the Computational Grand Challenge Program \Black Hole Binaries: Coalescence and Gravitational Radiation," there is a need for a \jargonless" description of the formulation of General Relativity that is used in computer simulations (i.e. its initial value formulation). This paper is an attempt at meeting this need. It should be stressed, however, that the main goal of this paper is to give a precise mathematical statement (sans jargon) of the initial value formulation of general relativity. The rst section of the paper introduces the reader to a few major conceptual issues in General Relativity. In no way does this paper attempt to give a full physical interpretation of General Relativity. Interested readers are referred elsewhere [1, 2]. Note: This paper itself is a work in progress, and can be added to/revised at any time. (Date of last revision: Oct 10, 1994).

2 Conventions and Notation In this paper, standard index notation will be used. The convention will be that greek indices run from 0 to 3 (i.e. = 0; 1; 2; 3), and latin indices run from 1 to 3 (i.e. i = 1; 2; 3). For example, v i denotes the three numbers (v 1 ; v 2 ; v 3 ) (not v to the rst, second, and third power). Also, we will dierentiate between superscripted indices and subscripted indices ( v i does not equal v i in general). The \Einstein summation convention" will also be employed. This convention dictates that indices that are repeated, once as a superscript and once as a subscript, are summed over. For example, v i w i = v 1 w 1 + v 2 w 2 + v 3 w 3. Another example is the standard matrix equation M~x = ~ b, where M is a (4 x 4) matrix and ~x and ~ b are vectors. This equation, using index notation, reads M x = b. The speed of light, c, is set equal to 1. Therefore, the time coordinate, x 0 = t, is measured in meters. To convert to seconds, use the conversion dened by c = 1: 1 second = 3 10 8 meters).

3 1 The Spirit of General Relativity General Relativity is a theory of gravitational interaction. In a real sense, it is a more accuarate theory than Newtonian gravity (F g = G m 1m 2 r 2 12 ), because it has better agreement with observations. This is not to say that the Newtonian theory of gravity is a bad theory of gravity. It does very well in predicting how fast a rock should fall or predicting how long it should take the moon to circle the earth. In simple cases like these, the Newtonian theory of gravity and General Relativity agree to within obervational uncertainty. In fact, Newtonian gravity is the \weak-eld limit" of General Relativity. However, very accurate measurements of other gravitational phenomena reveal a deviation from the Newtonian theory of gravity. To date all of these deviations are explained by General Relativity [3]. In addition to explaining weak-eld deviations from Newtonian gravity, General Relativity has recently (in the past decades) passed a \strong-eld" test, that of the prediction of the rate of energy loss due to gravitational waves emitted from a binary neutron star system. Although Newtonian gravity and General Relativity are both theories of gravitational interaction, they are conceptually very dierent. Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation gives the magnitude of the mutual force between two point particles of mass m 1 and m 2 seperated by a distance of r 12 as F 12 = G m 1m 2 r 2 12 where G is a constant. If we think of 3 dimensional space as the surface of a at 2 dimensional table, the picture is as follows: In the diagram, note the clock on the wall. Its job is to keep track of \absolute time". In Newtonian gravity, time is seperate from space, and the wrist watches on all of the observers in space agree with the clock on the wall (absolute time). In contrast to Newtonian gravity, with General Relativity, there is no force due to gravity!! Also, the \table top" that the particles sit in is not at, nor is it simply 3 dimensional space. Pictorally, we can think of 4 dimensional spacetime as a stretched 2 dimensional rubber sheet. If we place a bowling ball on the sheet, the bowling ball deforms the rubber sheet:

4 r12 m2 m1 Table top represents 3 dimensional space Newtonian Gravity

5 Two-dimensional rubber sheet representing four-dimensional spacetime Just as the bowling ball deforms the rubber sheet, General Relativity says that mass (or energy) will deform, or curve, the spacetime around it. Also, there is no \absolute time" in General Relativity. Dierent observers will disagree as to how much time passes between events. Now, in addition to a bowling ball sitting on the rubber sheet, imagine a marble rolling along the rubber sheet. General Relativity says that there is no gravitational force between the marble and the bowling ball! The marble will therefore travel in a straight line, since there are no forces acting on it. But what does it mean to travel in a straight line when the spacetime you are sitting in is curved? In at space, a straight line between two points can be thought of as the unique path connecting the two points that has the shortest length. We take this concept of \extremal distance" over to the case of curved spacetime. We now say that the marble follows the path with extremal length (the path with shortest distance). These curves are called geodesics, and can be intuitively thought of as the \straightest possible path" in curved spacetimes.

Geodesic So, General Relativity is not a law which gives the gravitational force between a bowling ball and a marble. Instead, it is a theory that predicts how the bowling ball curves the spacetime around it. The marble in \free fall" is simply following a geodesic (path of shortest distance) in this curved spacetime. Therefore, the dynamical variables in General Relativity are variables that determine the distance between any two (innitesimally) nearby points. These variables are referred to as \the metric." 2 Vacuum General Relativity Mathematically, the theory of vacuum General Relativity (General Relativity without matter) is a set of 10 coupled, nonlinear, second{order, partial dierential equations involving ten functions of 4 independent variables or coordinates. The coordinates, x, can be thought of as numbers labeling the \where" and \when" of events: x = ( t ) ; x; y; z {z} {z } when where The set of all events is the arena of General Relativity, and is referred to as \spacetime."

The dynamical variables of the theory can be thought of as functions arranged as entries in a symmetric 4x4 matrix: 2 4 g 00 (t; x; y; z) g 01 (t; x; y; z) g 02 (t; x; y; z) g 03 (t; x; y; z) g 01 (t; x; y; z) g 11 (t; x; y; z) g 12 (t; x; y; z) g 13 (t; x; y; z) g 02 (t; x; y; z) g 12 (t; x; y; z) g 22 (t; x; y; z) g 23 (t; x; y; z) g 03 (t; x; y; z) g 13 (t; x; y; z) g 23 (t; x; y; z) g 33 (t; x; y; z) where each entry is a function of the coordinates, x. In index notation, this matrix is referred to as g (its symmetric property can be stated as g = g ). In the literature, this matrix is known as \the metric," since it is used to calculate the distance between nearby points in the physical spacetime. Note that, although a 4x4 matrix has 1 entries, the matrix is symmetric so that there are only 10 independent functions. Remember, g is a function of the coordinates, x = (t; x; y; z). The Einstein eld equations are 10 coupled, nonlinear, second order, partial differential equations involving the metric, g. These equations would take tens of pages to explicitly list as derivatives of the metric. This fact partially explains the need for jargon in General Relativity (relativists refer to these equations as R = 0. Perhaps this is \jargon-overkill"). It should be stated that in General Relativity, one is free to use whatever coordinates (cartesian, spherical, hyperbolic, etc.) one wishes. However, the physical predictions of the theory are independent of the choice of coordinates. It is important to use this coordinate freedom to ones advantage when attacking a problem. In fact, this coordinate freedom introduces some ambiguity in the initial value formulation which must be dealt with. 3 General Relativity Admits an Initial Value Formulation The Einstein equations as described above are too complicated to solve directly, except in cases of high symmetry. In a realistic problem (i.e. the coalescence of spiraling black holes), what one requires is an initial value formulation of the theory. The analogy in classical mechanics is well known: once the position and velocity of each particle is known, Newton's second law (along with rules for the interaction between the particles) completely determines the trajectory of each particle. In that case, the initial data are the position and velocity of each particle at an instant of time, t 0. 3 5

8 It turns out that General Relativity admits an initial value formulation that is similar in spirit to that in classical mechanics. What follows is a description of that formulation. The details of the calculations can be found in [1, 2]. In the initial value formulation, spacetime (x = (t; x; y; z)) is separated into space (x i = (x; y; z)) and time (x 0 = t). This \foliation" can be viewed pictorally as follows: t spacetime Foliation x z y t = 15 t = 10 t = 5 z t = 0 y x Space-time is sliced up into \spatial surfaces," and each dierent surface is labeled by the (continuous) parameter, t. These \spatial surfaces" can have any topology (R 3,T 3,S 2 R, etc.). For our purposes, we will assume that each surface is coordinatized by x i = (x; y; z). The 10 Einstein equations are then \projected" onto this foliation. What happens is that natural dynamical variables appear: the so{called 3{metric, q ij. Like the dynamical variables for the full Einstein equations g, q ij can be thought of as a symmetric matrix of functions: 2 4 q 11 (t; x; y; z) q 12 (t; x; y; z) q 13 (t; x; y; z) q 12 (t; x; y; z) q 22 (t; x; y; z) q 23 (t; x; y; z) q 13 (t; x; y; z) q 23 (t; x; y; z) q 33 (t; x; y; z) Unlike g, q ij is only a 3x3 symmetric matrix, so there are only independent functions. At rst glance, it might appear that the system is over-determined. Afterall, there are 10 independent equations for functions. A closer look reveals that 4 of the equations involve only rst{order time derivatives of 3 5

9 q ij. In the analogy with classical mechanics, these equations involve only positions and velocities. These equations are therefore constraints on the initial data. This leaves 10? 4 = equations left over, which are called the evolution equations. They completely determine the evolution of the dynamical variables, q ij. 4 Constraint equations for q s and q s 10 Einstein equations for g s Evolution equations for q s When working with second order dierential equations, it is usually convenient (in analytical work, as well as in numerical work) to write each second order (in time) dierential equation as two rst order (in time) differential equations, treating the time derivative of the dynamical variable as a separate dynamical variable. In our case, the new dynamical variable is K ij ; a symmetric 3x3 matrix of functions: 2 4 K 11 (t; x; y; z) K 12 (t; x; y; z) K 13 (t; x; y; z) K 12 (t; x; y; z) K 22 (t; x; y; z) K 23 (t; x; y; z) K 13 (t; x; y; z) K 23 (t; x; y; z) K 33 (t; x; y; z) and is called the \extrinsic curvature." It derives its name from its geometrical interpretation: it contains information on how each \spatial surface" is \embedded" in the spacetime. For our purposes, we will think of K ij as \the time derivative of q ij " (although, K ij does not strictly equal @ @t (q ij(t; x; y; z)), as we shall see explicitly). The picture so far looks like 3 5

10 this: 4 Constraint equations for q s and q s 4 Constraint equations for q s and K s 10 Einstein equations for g s Evolution equations for q s Evolution equations for q s Evolution equations for K s 4 The Final Step Before writing down the constraint and evolution equations, let's take a look back. The way we \slice up," or foliate, spacetime is quite arbitrary:

11 t spacetime Foliation #1 Foliation #2 z y x This is actually a restatement of the freedom to choose coordinates in General Relativity. This freedom results in ambiguity in the evolution equations for q ij and K ij. Specically, there are 4 undetermined functions in the evolution equations. These functions are given the names \lapse" (1 function) and \shift" (3 functions): Lapse: (t; x; y; z) (1 function) Shift: N i (t; x; y; z) (3 functions. Remember: i = 1; 2; 3) The geometrical interpretation of the lapse and shift is given in the picture below:

12 (t + t,x,y,z) t + t vector representing the flow of time α n, where n is the unit normal to spatial surface t t (t,x,y,z) shift vector, N As shown in the diagram, the shift functions (N i ) are the components of the vector that describe the \tangential shift" of coordinates as one moves from the t 0 spatial surface to the t 0 + t spatial surface. The lapse describes how much physical time elapses between the two spatial surfaces. It should be emphasized again that the physical predictions of the theory are completely independent of the choice of the lapse and shift. In numerical work, this freedom (if used wisely) can be used to accomplish one or more of the following: avoid singularities (regions of spacetime that generate innite answers to physical questions) keep numerical algorithm stable insure the consistency of the constraints 5 Summary The initial value formulation of general relativity consists of 12 rst order (in time), coupled, nonlinear dierential equations for the 12 dynamical variables, q ij (t; x; y; z) and K ij (t; x; y; z). The initial data for the theory is specied by q ij (t 0 ; x; y; z) and K ij (t 0 ; x; y; z) (that is, by assigning values

13 to q ij and K ij at an instant of time, t 0 ) that satisfy 4 constraint equations. The constraint equations are consistent in the sense that if they are solved on the initial spatial surface and that spatial surface is evolved via the evolution equations, then the constraints are solved automatically on any future spatial surface. In addition, the evolution equations contain 4 arbitrary functions, (lapse) and N i (shift). The physical predictions of General Relativity are independent of the choice of these functions. In the way of notation, I will dene q ij (note the superscripted indices) as the inverse of the 3{metric, q ij. That is, I will also dene 2 4 5.1 Constraints q 11 q 12 q 13 q 12 q 22 q 23 q 13 q 23 q 33 3 2 5 = 4? k ij = 1 2 qkm ( @q im @x j q 11 q 12 q 13 q 12 q 22 q 23 q 13 q 23 q 33 + @q jm @x i? @q ij @x m ) 3?1 The rst constraint, C, is called the scalar constraint (or sometimes the Hamiltonian constraint). It reads 0 = C = q ij ( @?k ij @x k? @? k jk @x i +? m ij? k mk??m jk? k im) + (K ij q ij ) 2? K ik K jm q ij q km The other 3 constraints, C i, are called the vector constraints (or sometimes the dieomorphism constraints). They read 5 0 = C i = q jk ( @K ik @x j 5.2 Evolution Equations? @K jk @x i + K jm? m ik? K im? m jk) The evolution equations for the q ij are @q ij @t = 2K ij + q jk ( @N k @x i The evolution equations for the K ij are + N m? k im) + q ik ( @N k @x j + N m? k jm) @K ij @t =?( @?k ij @x k? @? k jk @x i +? m ij?k km??m jk?k im ) + qkm (2K ik K jm? K km K ij ) + + @2 @x i @x j? @ @x k?k ij + N k @K ij @x k + K @N k jk @x i + K ik @N k @x j

14 Glossary of Terms Christoel symbol (? ) Mathematically, these are simply combinations of rst derivatives of the metric:? = 1 2 g ( @g @x + @g @x? @g @x ) Einstein equations The Einstein equations are 10 coupled, nonlinear, second order, partial dierential equations in the 10 metric functions: G = 8T where G is the Einstein tensor and T is the stress-energy tensor. Einstein tensor (G ) The Einstein tensor is dened as: G = R? 1 2 Rg where R is the Ricci tensor, R is the scalar curvature, and g is the metric. Geodesic Geodesics are paths in spacetimes that have \extremal distance". They can be thought of intuitively as the \straightest possible paths" in curved spacetime. Physically, geodesics are trajectories of particles in free-fall (no forces acting on the particles). Metric (g ) The metric is a set of 10 functions that can be thought of as entries in a symmetric matrix: 2 4 g 00 g 01 g 02 g 03 g 01 g 11 g 12 g 13 g 02 g 12 g 22 g 23 g 03 g 13 g 23 g 33 Physically, the metric determines the distance between (innitesimally) nearby points. All information concerning the geometry of the spacetime is contained in the metric, and it is therefore the metric that is the dynamical variable in General Relativity. Ricci tensor (R ) The Ricci tensor is a set of 10 independent functions of the coordinates. It is constructed by contracting the second and fourth indices of the Riemann tensor: R = R. 3 5

15 Riemann tensor (R ) Mathematically, The Riemann tensor is a set of 20 (not 25!!) independent functions of the coordinates that completely describe the curvature of the spacetime. (if R = 0, then the spacetime is said to be completely at.) It is constructed out of various rst and second derivatives of the metric. Scalar Curvature (R) The scalar curvature is a function of the coordinates obtained by contracting the Ricci tensor with the metric: R = R g. References [1] C. Misner, K. Thorne, and J. Wheeler, Gravitation (193). [2] R. Wald, General Relativity (1984). [3] C. M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (1993).