CVEEN Table of Contents

Similar documents
2D Embankment and Slope Analysis (Numerical)

CVEEN 7330 Modeling Exercise 2c

CVEEN Table of Contents

Numerical Modeling in Geotechnical Engineering October 17,

Earth Pressure Theory

Dynamic Analysis Contents - 1

1D Nonlinear Numerical Methods

Recent Research on EPS Geofoam Seismic Buffers. Richard J. Bathurst and Saman Zarnani GeoEngineering Centre at Queen s-rmc Canada

1 Slope Stability for a Cohesive and Frictional Soil

7 Uniaxial Compressive Strength of a Jointed Rock Sample

13 Plastic Flow in a Punch Problem

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PILES IN SAND BASED ON SOIL-PILE INTERACTION

1 Slope Stability for a Cohesive and Frictional Soil

8 Displacements near the Face of an Advancing Shaft

Design Procedures For Dynamically Loaded Foundations

10 Slope Stability Analysis of a Rock Slope

13 Dewatered Construction of a Braced Excavation

13 Step-Path Failure of Rock Slopes

Effect of structural design on fundamental frequency of reinforced-soil retaining walls

Dynamics Manual. Version 7

Figure A7 22: Micrograph of PX (a) before and (b) after heat treatment to 50ºC

ON THE PREDICTION OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FROM TWO PILE TESTS UNDER FORCED VIBRATIONS

4 Undrained Cylindrical Cavity Expansion in a Cam-Clay Medium

NONLINEAR CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PILE-SOIL SYSTEM UNDER VERTICAL VIBRATION

Introduction to structural dynamics

Lab Practical - Discontinuum Analysis & Distinct Element Method

15 Drained and Undrained Triaxial Compression Test on a Cam-Clay Sample

Dynamic modelling in slopes using finite difference program

10 Steady-State Fluid Flow with a Free Surface

Lab Practical - Discontinuum Analysis & Distinct Element Method

3 Cylindrical Hole in an Infinite Mohr-Coulomb Medium

1 STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

2D Liquefaction Analysis for Bridge Abutment

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

Geotechnical Modeling Issues

1-160 Dynamic Analysis

T1 T e c h n i c a l S e c t i o n

Dynamics of structures

Site Response Analysis with 2D-DDA

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

Dynamic Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Structure Using Plasticity and Interface Damage Models

Dynamic Response of EPS Blocks /soil Sandwiched Wall/embankment

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

Numerical Modelling of Dynamic Earth Force Transmission to Underground Structures

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

Example-3. Title. Description. Cylindrical Hole in an Infinite Mohr-Coulomb Medium

1 DYNAMIC ANALYSIS DYNAMIC ANALYSIS Overview

Lateral Earth Pressure

Static Pile Head Impedance using 3D Nonlinear FEM Analysis

Prob. 1 SDOF Structure subjected to Ground Shaking

DYNAMIC RESPONSE APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

USER S MANUAL. 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example. University of California: San Diego.

Lecture 9: Harmonic Loads (Con t)

Dynamic Soil Pressures on Embedded Retaining Walls: Predictive Capacity Under Varying Loading Frequencies


Example Application 12. Embankment Loading on a Cam-Clay Foundation

Model tests and FE-modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction

Appendix G: UDEC Code. ;UDEC V6 Code to generate 15m tall by 10 m wide pillar with steel platen.

Reciprocal of the initial shear stiffness of the interface K si under initial loading; reciprocal of the initial tangent modulus E i of the soil

Dynamic behavior of turbine foundation considering full interaction among facility, structure and soil

The... of a particle is defined as its change in position in some time interval.

INFLUENCE OF SOIL NONLINEARITY AND LIQUEFACTION ON DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF PILE GROUPS

Role of hysteretic damping in the earthquake response of ground

CHAPTER 6: ASSESSMENT OF A COMPREHENSIVE METHOD FOR PREDICTING PERFORMANCE

Computational Simulation of Dynamic Response of Vehicle Tatra T815 and the Ground

Analysis of Planar Truss

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

4 Cylindrical Hole in an Infinite Hoek-Brown Medium

QUAKE/W ProShake Comparison

Chapter 13. Simple Harmonic Motion

Using the Timoshenko Beam Bond Model: Example Problem

4.4 1) 단순지지된깊은보 선형동적해석검증예제 ANALYSIS REFERENCE. REFERENCE NAFEMS 1 Beam elements, solid elements

Soil Dynamics Prof. Deepankar Choudhury Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

202 Index. failure, 26 field equation, 122 force, 1

Protection of Pipelines and Buried Structures Using EPS Geofoam. Campus Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84112;

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

Engineering Science OUTCOME 2 - TUTORIAL 3 FREE VIBRATIONS

Numerical Modeling of Interface Between Soil and Pile to Account for Loss of Contact during Seismic Excitation

16 Rainfall on a Slope

1D Analysis - Simplified Methods

Dr.Vinod Hosur, Professor, Civil Engg.Dept., Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3

Elasticity: Term Paper. Danielle Harper. University of Central Florida

Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

Numerical simulation of inclined piles in liquefiable soils

Application of pseudo-symmetric technique in dynamic analysis of concrete gravity dams

8 Lined Circular Tunnel in an Elastic Medium with Anisotropic Stresses

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

Behavior of Concrete Dam under Seismic Load

Bending Load & Calibration Module

Effect of Dynamic Interaction between Train Vehicle and Structure on Seismic Response of Structure

Foundation Engineering Dr. Priti Maheshwari Department Of Civil Engineering Indian Institute Of Technology, Roorkee

6. NON-LINEAR PSEUDO-STATIC ANALYSIS OF ADOBE WALLS

Numerical model comparison on deformation behavior of a TSF embankment subjected to earthquake loading

1.8 Unconfined Compression Test

1D Ground Response Analysis

The effect of stope inclination and wall rock roughness on backfill free face stability

Chapter 14: Periodic motion

Influences of material dilatancy and pore water pressure on stability factor of shallow tunnels

Transcription:

CVEEN 7330 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 1 Objectives... 2 ackground... 2 Model Setup and Analysis Input... 2 Data for Interfaces... 5 Required Outputs from FLAC... 10 Required Calculations and Discussion... 10 FLAC Solution:... 10 Discussion... 15 FISH Code for model... 15

Objectives In this exercise, the student develops a FLAC model to replicate the dynamic behavior of geofoam embankment for the case of a rectangular geofoam mass resting on a soil foundation with sliding allowed in the geofoam under horizontal sinusoidal input motion only. The lump mass (load distribution slab, untreated base course and concrete pavement) is placed atop the geofoam and bonded to the top layer, so slippage is not allowed at this interface. ackground Dynamic sliding is one mode of failure and can be explored using interface elements in FLAC and the appropriate friction angle for the interfaces. Model Setup and Analysis Input 1. Model Type: Elastic 2. Elastic material properties ρ (kg/m 3 ) γ (lb/ft 3 ) E (MPa) v K (MPa) G (MPa) Soil 2000 115.00 500 0.35 555.6 185.2 Goafoam 20 1.25 10 0.103 4.20 4.53 UTC 2241 140.00 570 0.35 633.3 211.1 LDS & PCCP 2401 150.00 30000 0.18 15625.0 12711.9 Foundation soil properties (Vs = 1000 ft/s and = 0.35) prop bulk 500e6 shear 185e6 den 2000 Geofoam properties prop bulk 4.198e6 shear 4.53e6 den 20 Concrete mass above geofoam properties prop bulk 15625e6 shear 12712 den 2305

3. Geometry (Figure 1 below) 4. oundary Conditions a. Static conditions with gravity on see Figure 2. b. Dynamic conditions with horizontal velocity wave - see Figure 3. JO TITLE :. FLAC (Version 5.00) LEGEND 1.400 24-Apr-08 7:54 step 6907-1.111E+00 <x< 2.111E+01-5.611E+00 <y< 1.661E+01 6 5 1.000 Grid plot 4 0 5E 0 interface id#'s Fixed Gridpoints -direction oth directions 3 2 1 0.600 0.200-0.200 Steven artlett University of Utah 0.200 0.600 1.000 1.400 1.800 Figure 1. Geofoam/Soil model and boundary conditions for static loading under gravity.

JO TITLE :. FLAC (Version 5.00) LEGEND 1.400 24-Apr-08 7:57 step 6907-1.111E+00 <x< 2.111E+01-5.611E+00 <y< 1.661E+01 6 5 1.000 shear_mod 4.530E+06 1.850E+08 1.270E+10 Fixed Gridpoints -direction oth directions Grid plot 0 5E 0 interface id#'s 4 3 2 1 0.600 0.200-0.200 Steven artlett University of Utah 0.200 0.600 1.000 1.400 1.800 Figure 2. Plot of shear modulus for model. JO TITLE :. FLAC (Version 5.00) LEGEND 1.400 24-Apr-08 8:11 step 102725 Dynamic Time 4.0000E+00-1.067E+00 <x< 2.116E+01-5.586E+00 <y< 1.664E+01 shear_mod 4.530E+06 1.850E+08 1.270E+10 Fixed Gridpoints -direction oth directions Grid plot 0 5E 0 interface id#'s 6 5 4 3 2 1 1.000 0.600 0.200-0.200 Steven artlett University of Utah 0.200 0.600 1.000 1.400 1.800 Figure 3. oundary conditions for dynamic sliding case.

5. Fish code for sliding interfaces within geofoam (Fig. 1) a. Generate grid b. Declare model type (note: gaps in model type are left for interfaces) c. Assign elastic properties d. Assign grid to coordinate space (with generate command) e. Create interfaces for sliding planes f. Assign interface properties sand-geofoam interface friction = 31 degrees geofoam-geofoam interface friction = 32 degress normal and shear spring constants 1. Normal Stiffness = 10(K+4/3G)/Δzmin, normal 2. Shear Stiffness = 10(K+4/3G)/Δzmin, normal Data for Interfaces int Normal Stiffness = kn = ks (MPa) Friction Cohesion Dilation z Geofoam-soil 1-2 102 35 0 6 1 Geof-Geof 3-10 102 32 0 0 1 Geofoam-lds 21 102 glued 0 0 1 lds-utbc 22-23 15247 glued 0 0 0.6 utbc-pccp 23-24 15247 glued 0 0 0.6 **Use least stiff of two adjacent layers for kn and ks FLAC code for Step 5 generation of grid grid 20 17 declare model type model elastic j 1 5 model elastic i 6 15 j 7 model elastic i 6 15 j 9 model elastic i 6 15 j 11 model elastic i 6 15 j 13 model elastic i 6 15 j 15 model elastic i 6 15 j 17

assign elastic properties prop bulk 500e6 shear 185e6 den 2000 i 1 20 j 1 5 foundation properties vs = 1000 ft/s prop bulk 4.20e6 shear 4.53e6 den 20 i 6 15 j 7 geofoam properties prop bulk 4.20e6 shear 4.53e6 den 20 i 6 15 j 9 geofoam properties prop bulk 4.20e6 shear 4.53e6 den 20 i 6 15 j 11 geofoam properties prop bulk 4.20e6 shear 4.53e6 den 20 i 6 15 j 13 geofoam properties prop bulk 4.20e6 shear 4.53e6 den 20 i 6 15 j 15 geofoam properties prop bulk 15625e6 shear 12712e6den 2305 i 6 15 j 17 mass above geofoam Assign grid to coordinate space gen 0 0 0 5 20 5 20 0 i 1 21 j 1 6 gen 5 5 5 6 15 6 15 5 i 6 16 j 7 8 gen 5 6 5 7 15 7 15 6 i 6 16 j 9 10 gen 5 7 5 8 15 8 15 7 i 6 16 j 11 12 gen 5 8 5 9 15 9 15 8 i 6 16 j 13 14 gen 5 9 5 10 15 10 15 9 i 6 16 j 15 16 gen 5 10 5 11 15 11 15 10 i 6 16 j 17 18 create interfaces int 1 Aside from 6,6 to 16,6 side from 6,7 to 16,7 int 2 Aside from 6,8 to 16,8 side from 6,9 to 16,9 int 3 Aside from 6,10 to 16,10 side from 6,11 to 16,11 int 4 Aside from 6,12 to 16,12 side from 6,13 to 16,13 int 5 Aside from 6,14 to 16,14 side from 6,15 to 16,15 int 6 Aside from 6,16 to 16,16 side from 6,17 to 16,17 assign inteface properties int 1 kn 102e6 ks 102e6 friction = 35 coh = 0 dilation = 6 tbond=0 bslip on int 2 kn 102e6 ks 102e6 friction = 32 coh = 0 dilation = 0 tbond=0 bslip on int 3 kn 102e6 ks 102e6 friction = 32 coh = 0 dilation = 0 tbond=0 bslip on int 4 kn 102e6 ks 102e6 friction = 32 coh = 0 dilation = 0 tbond=0 bslip on int 5 kn 102e6 ks 102e6 friction = 32 coh = 0 dilation = 0 tbond=0 bslip on int 6 glue kn 102e6 ks 102e6 6. Perform static analysis a. Turn gravity on b. Establish boundary conditions c. Turn off dynamic module d. Make history of unbalanced forces (his 20) e. Solve for static case by stepping 9000 steps FLAC code for Step 6 GRAVIT ON FOR STATIC FORCES set grav 9.81

OUNDAR CONDITIONS FOR STATIC CASE fix right side of soil box fix x i 1 fix left side of soil box fix x i 21 fix x i 6 j 7 18 (don't fix x in geofoam for static case) fix x i 16 j 7 18 (don't fix x in geofoam for static case) fix base fix y j 1 fix x j 1 STATIC LOADING set dyn off his 20 unbal solve 7. Turn on dynamic mode and establish large strain conditions and damping properties. (Note that no damping other than Rayleigh damping has been used for the soil.) (Note hysteretic damping has been used for geofoam using sigmoidal model.) set dyn on set large set dy_damp rayl 0.05 15 j 1 5 damping in geofoam ini dy_damp=hyst sig3 1-0.45.3 j 7 ini dy_damp=hyst sig3 1-0.45.3 j 9 ini dy_damp=hyst sig3 1-0.45.3 j 11 ini dy_damp=hyst sig3 1-0.45.3 j 13 ini dy_damp=hyst sig3 1-0.45.3 j 15 Calculations of hysteretic damping using sigmoidal model a = 1 b = -0.45 x o = 0.3 Geofoam (lab) Geofoam (sig3 model) L Ms g L Ms 0.0001-4 1 0.0001-4 0.999929 0.0003-3.52288 1 0.0003-3.52287875 0.999796 0.001-3 1 0.001-3 0.999347 0.003-2.52288 1 0.003-2.52287875 0.998117 0.01-2 1 0.01-2 0.994007 0.03-1.52288 0.98 0.03-1.52287875 0.98289 0.1-1 0.95 0.1-1 0.947294 0.3-0.52288 0.88 0.3-0.52287875 0.861597 1 0 0.69 1 0 0.660756 3 0.477121 0.41 3 0.47712125 0.40285 10 1 0.18 10 1 0.174285

G/Gmax L = log 10 Ms = G/Gmax 1.2 1 Clay (Seed and Sun) Geofoam (Lab) Geofoam (sig3 model) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 Shear strain (percent) Figure 4. Sigmodial 3 model fit to geofoam data

8. Establish boundary conditions for dynamic case ESTALISH OUNDARIES FOR DNAMIC CASE free x free y OUNDAR CONDITIONS FOR DNAMIC CASE for horizontal wave only fix y j 1 6 fix x j 1 9. Create horizontal wave (1 g amplitude wave at fundamental frequency of geofoam) a. Horizontal velocity wave amplitude = 0.65 m/s for 1 g acceleration. b. Horizontal wave period = 0.41 s (fundamental period of geofoam) CREATE WAVES wave 1 is horizontal wave def wave1 for free vibration wave1=amp1*cos(2*pi/period1*dytime)/(dytime+1)^10 for forced vibration wave1=amp1*cos(2*pi/period1*dytime) end set amp1 = 0.65 for 10 m/s2 accel at base set period1 = 0.41 period1 of 0.41 s is resonant frequency 10. Input waves into bottom of model FOR HOR. WAVE apply xvel 1 hist=wave1 j=1 11. Establish locations for dynamic histories (See Fig. 3) HISTORIES his 1 dytime his 2 wave1 his 3 xvel j 1 i 11 his 4 xdisp j 1 i 11 his 5 xvel j 6 i 11 his 6 xdisp j 6 i 11 his 7 xvel j 18 i 11 his 8 xdisp j 18 i 11 his 10 yvel j 1 i 11

his 11 ydisp j 1 i 11 his 12 yvel j 6 i 11 his 13 ydisp j 6 i 11 his 14 yvel j 18 i 11 his 15 ydisp j 18 i 11 his 16 xacc j 1 i 11 his 17 xacc j 6 i 11 his 18 xacc j 18 i 11 12. Reset displacements to start dynamic case ini xdisp = 0 ydisp = 0 13. Solve for dynamic case for 4 seconds solve dytime 4.0 Required Outputs from FLAC 1. Plot of the following at the resonant period for a duration t = 5 s. Make all plots at the middle (centerline) of the model: a. Unbalanced forces from static and dynamic loading b. displacement at bottom of soil c. displacement at top of soil d. displacement top of pavement e. acceleration at bottom of soil f. acceleration at top of soil g. acceleration at top of pavement h. Final vector displacement pattern at time = 4 seconds 2. Animation of displacement vectors using an increment of 500 steps for t = 4 s. Required Calculations and Discussion 1. Discuss how the change in the amplitude of the horizontal wave affects the displacement at the top of the geofoam and the sliding within the geofoam. Use graphs or figures to do this. FLAC Solution: