Pole-Placement Design A Polynomial Approach

Similar documents
Pole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 3

LABORATORY OF AUTOMATION SYSTEMS Analytical design of digital controllers

CBE507 LECTURE III Controller Design Using State-space Methods. Professor Dae Ryook Yang

EECE 460 : Control System Design

FRTN 15 Predictive Control

10/8/2015. Control Design. Pole-placement by state-space methods. Process to be controlled. State controller

Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems

Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems

Digital Control Systems

Lecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control

Linear Control Systems

Optimal Polynomial Control for Discrete-Time Systems

EE451/551: Digital Control. Chapter 3: Modeling of Digital Control Systems

Control Design. Lecture 9: State Feedback and Observers. Two Classes of Control Problems. State Feedback: Problem Formulation

Discrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture

Pole Placement Design

DIGITAL CONTROLLER DESIGN

Recursive, Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) Digital Filters:

Control Systems. Root Locus & Pole Assignment. L. Lanari

1. Partial Fraction Expansion All the polynomials in this note are assumed to be complex polynomials.

ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1

SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015

D(s) G(s) A control system design definition

Process Modelling, Identification, and Control

Chapter 7 - Solved Problems

Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems. Stability of Linear Systems. Sven Laur University of Tartu

4.0 Update Algorithms For Linear Closed-Loop Systems

Video 5.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh

Control Systems Lab - SC4070 Control techniques

Identification of ARX, OE, FIR models with the least squares method

EEE 184: Introduction to feedback systems

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY

State Observers and the Kalman filter

Lecture 6: Deterministic Self-Tuning Regulators

Lecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30

Digital Control: Summary # 7

Classify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.

Representation of standard models: Transfer functions are often used to represent standard models of controllers and signal filters.

Lecture 04: Discrete Frequency Domain Analysis (z-transform)

Chapter 13 Digital Control

Module 9: State Feedback Control Design Lecture Note 1

Trajectory tracking control and feedforward

Lecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design.

Digital Control System Models. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada

Damped Oscillators (revisited)

The loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2)

Time Response of Systems

Z - Transform. It offers the techniques for digital filter design and frequency analysis of digital signals.

Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications

Chapter 15 - Solved Problems

EE 422G - Signals and Systems Laboratory

Control System Design

APPLICATION OF ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER TO WATER HYDRAULIC SERVO CYLINDER

Roundoff Noise in Digital Feedback Control Systems

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design

CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES

Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control

Process Modelling, Identification, and Control


Subsets of Euclidean domains possessing a unique division algorithm

Chapter 3 Data Acquisition and Manipulation

Filtered-X LMS vs repetitive control for active structural acoustic control of periodic disturbances

Chapter 7. Digital Control Systems

Lifted approach to ILC/Repetitive Control

Tradeoffs and Limits of Performance

Part IB Paper 6: Information Engineering LINEAR SYSTEMS AND CONTROL. Glenn Vinnicombe HANDOUT 5. An Introduction to Feedback Control Systems

Problem 2 (Gaussian Elimination, Fundamental Spaces, Least Squares, Minimum Norm) Consider the following linear algebraic system of equations:

1 Loop Control. 1.1 Open-loop. ISS0065 Control Instrumentation

i;\-'i frz q > R>? >tr E*+ [S I z> N g> F 'x sa :r> >,9 T F >= = = I Y E H H>tr iir- g-i I * s I!,i --' - = a trx - H tnz rqx o >.F g< s Ire tr () -s

Exam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time

Control System Design

Root Locus. Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples. School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Root Locus - 1

Steady State Errors. Recall the closed-loop transfer function of the system, is

Review: transient and steady-state response; DC gain and the FVT Today s topic: system-modeling diagrams; prototype 2nd-order system

Introduction to Digital Control. Week Date Lecture Title

Discrete-time models and control

School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by:

Control System Design

Additional Closed-Loop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 14)

Lecture 1: Introduction to System Modeling and Control. Introduction Basic Definitions Different Model Types System Identification

R10. IV B.Tech II Semester Regular Examinations, April/May DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEMS JNTUK

21.4. Engineering Applications of z-transforms. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

Second Order and Higher Order Systems

CONTROL OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS

Properties of Open-Loop Controllers

Systems Analysis and Control

Pole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2

Ch. 7: Z-transform Reading

YTÜ Mechanical Engineering Department

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems

Direct adaptive suppression of multiple unknown vibrations using an inertial actuator

Module 6: Deadbeat Response Design Lecture Note 1

Discrete-time Controllers

YTÜ Mechanical Engineering Department

Automatic Control Systems (FCS) Lecture- 8 Steady State Error

1. Cancellation of Left Half Plane Poles with Zeros

sc Control Systems Design Q.1, Sem.1, Ac. Yr. 2010/11

Nonlinear System Identification Using MLP Dr.-Ing. Sudchai Boonto

Transcription:

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 1 Pole-Placement Design A Polynomial Approach Overview A Simple Design Problem The Diophantine Equation More Realistic Assumptions

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 2 A Simple Design Problem System: A(q)y[k] = B(q)u[k] (1) Assumptions: A = q n a + a 1 q na 1 + + a na 1q + a na is monic deg A > deg B Disturbances are widely spread impulses Specifications are given by the closed-loop characteristic polynomial, and the controller may have certain properties, for example, integral action General linear controller (u c : command signal, y: measured output, u: control signal): R(q)u[k] = T(q)u c [k] S(q)y[k] (2)

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 3 R(q) is chosen to be monic Feedforward part: H ff (z) = T(z) R(z) (3) Feedback part: H fb (z) = S(z) R(z) (4) Goal: Causal controller with no time-delay deg R = deg S (5)

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 4 Solving the design process Eliminating u[k] between the process model (1) and the controller (2) gives (A(q)R(q) + B(q)S(q)) y[k] = B(q)T(q)u c [k] (6) Closed-loop characteristic polynomial: A cl (z) = A(z)R(z) + B(z)S(z) (7) The pole-placement design is to find polynomials S and R that satisfy Eq (7) for given A, B, and A cl Eq (7) is called Diophantine Equation Factorising the A cl polynomial: A cl (z) = A c (z)a o (z) (8)

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 5 We call A c (z) the controller polynomial and A o (z) the observer polynomial In order to determine the polynomial T, we calculate the pulse-transfer function from the command signal to the output: Y (z) = B(z)T(z) A cl (z) U c(z) = B(z)T(z) A c (z)a o (z) U c(z) (9) Zeros of the open-loop system are also zeros of the closed-loop system (unless B(z) and A cl (z) have common factors) Let s choose the polynomial T so that is cancels the observer polynomial A o : The response to command signals is then given by T(z) = t 0 A o (z) (10) Y(z) = t 0B(z) A c (z) U c(z) (11) where t 0 is chosen to obtain a desired static gain for the system (eg, for unit gain: t 0 = A c (1)/B(1))

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 6 The Diophantine Equation - Minimal-Degree Solution: The equation A cl (z) = A(z)R(z) + B(z)S(z) (12) has a solution only if the greatest common divisor of A and B divides A cl Number of controller parameters when deg R = deg S: n p = 2(deg R + 1) = 2 deg R + 2 (13) Degree of A cl (remind that deg(ar) > deg(bs)): deg(a cl ) = max(deg(ar), deg(bs)) = deg(ar) = deg(a) + deg(r) (14) Number of equations (coefficients of A cl ): n e = deg(a cl ) + 1 = deg(a) + deg(r) + 1 (15)

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 7 Unique minimal solution: n e = n p (16) deg A + deg R + 1 = 2 deg R + 2 (17) deg R = deg A 1 (18) Degree of the closed-loop polynomial for the minimum-degree solution: deg A cl = 2 deg(a) 1 (19)

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 8 The Diophantine equation can be solved using matrix calculations (n = n a > n b ): a 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 a 1 a 0 0 0 b 1 b 0 0 0 r 0 a 2 a 1 a 0 0 b 2 b 1 b 0 0 r 1 a n a n 1 a n 2 a 0 b n b n 1 b n 2 b 0 r na 1 0 a n a n 1 a 1 0 b n b n 1 b 1 s 0 0 0 a n a 2 0 0 b n b 2 s na 1 = a cl,0 a cl,1 a cl,2 a cl,n a cl,n+1 a cl,n+2 0 0 0 a n 0 0 0 b n a cl,2n 1 B = b 0 q n + b 1 q n 1 + + b n 1 q + b n = b 0 q n b + b 1 q n b 1 + + b nb 1q + b nb (21) A = a 0 q n + a 1 q n 1 + + a n 1 q + a n = 1q n a + a 1 q n a 1 + + a na 1q + a na (22)

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 9 More Realistic Assumptions Cancellations of Poles and Zeros Factorisation of A and B: A = A + A (23) B = B + B (24) A + and B + are stable (well damped) factors that can be cancelled (both should be chosen monic) Poles that shall be cancelled must be controller zeros and zeros that must be cancelled must be controller poles: R = B + R d R (25) S = A + S d S (26) where R d and S d are fixed pre-determined parts of the controller (see next subsection)

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 10 Closed-loop polynomial: A cl = AR + BS = A + B + (R d RA + S d SB ) = A + B + A cl (27) Cancelled zeros and poles are part of the closed-loop polynomial and must therefore be well damped! Cancelling the common factors we find that the polynomials R and S must satisfy: RR d A + SS d B = A cl (28) Minimal-degree solution: n e = n p (29) deg A cl + 1 = deg R + deg S + 2 (30) max(deg RR d A, deg SS d B ) + 1 = deg R + deg S + 2 (31) For deg RR d A > deg SS d B we obtain: deg S = deg A + deg R d 1 (32) deg(rr d A ) = max(deg A cl, deg SS d B ) = deg A cl (33)

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 11 deg A + deg R d 1 }{{} deg S deg A cl deg A deg R d }{{} deg R Solving this equation for deg A cl yields: + deg S d + deg A + = deg S = deg R (34) + deg R d + deg B + (35) deg A cl = 2 deg A + deg R d + deg S d deg B + deg A + 1 (36) deg A cl = 2 deg A + deg R d + deg S d 1 (37)

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 12 In order to solve Eq (28) we create polynomials A and B with deg A = deg B = n = max(deg(a R d ), deg(b S d )): A = A R d (38) B = B S d (39) deg A cl + 1 a deg A a deg A 1 b deg B a deg B 1 0 a deg A 0 b deg B }{{}}{{} deg R+1 deg S+1 r 0 s 0 = a cl0 a cl1 (40)

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 13 Handling disturbances x = y = u = BT AR + SB u c + BT AR + SB u c + AT AR + SB u c BR AR + SB v BR AR + SB v + BS AR + SB v BS AR + SB e AR AR + SB e AS AR + SB e

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 14 To avoid steady-state errors due to constant load disturbances the static gain from the disturbance v to y must be zero: B(1)R(1) = 0 If B(1) 0 then we must require that R(1) = 0 This means that R d = z 1 is a factor of R(z) or that the controller is required to have integral action Elimination of periodic load disturbances (with period n ) by using R d = z n 1: v((k + n) ) v(k ) = (q n 1)v(k ) = 0 Elimination of sinusoidal load disturbances with frequency ω 0 : R d = z 2 + z cos(ω 0 ) + 1 Eliminating the effect of measurement noise at Nyquist frequency: S d = z + 1

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 15 Pre-filter revisited Let us factorise the polynomial A cl = A + A }{{} o B + A }{{} c A o A c Let s choose the polynomial T so that is cancels the observer polynomial A o : T(z) = t 0 A o (z) (41) The response to command signals is then given by Y(z) = t 0B(z) A c (z) U c(z) = H m (z)u c (z) (42) where t 0 is chosen to obtain a desired static gain for the system (eg, for unit gain: t 0 = A c (1)/B(1))