Fracture models for elasto-plastic materials as limits of gradient damage models coupled with plasticity: the antiplane case

Similar documents
EXISTENCE FOR CONSTRAINED DYNAMIC GRIFFITH FRACTURE WITH A WEAK MAXIMAL DISSIPATION CONDITION

Some results on the mathematical analysis of crack problems with forces applied on the fracture lips

MHA042 - Material mechanics: Duggafrågor

Models for dynamic fracture based on Griffith s criterion

The variational approach to fracture: Jean-Jacques Marigo

FATIGUE EFFECTS IN ELASTIC MATERIALS WITH VARIATIONAL DAMAGE MODELS: A VANISHING VISCOSITY APPROACH

Coupled second order singular perturbations for phase transitions

MODELING OF CONCRETE MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES. Kaspar Willam. Uniaxial Model: Strain-Driven Format of Elastoplasticity

Local minimization as a selection criterion

GRIFFITH THEORY OF BRITTLE FRACTURE REVISITED: MERITS AND DRAWBACKS

Continuation methods for non-linear analysis

Thermodynamically-Consistent Phase Field Models of Fracture: Variational Principles and Multi-Field FE Implementations

Lecture notes Models of Mechanics

Variational phase field model for dynamic brittle fracture

Elements of Continuum Elasticity. David M. Parks Mechanics and Materials II February 25, 2004

VARIATIONAL MODELING OF MICRO-CRACKING AND FAILURE IN FIBER-REINFORCED CONCRETES

Delamination and fracture of thin films

Micro-mechanics in Geotechnical Engineering

Global Existence for Rate-Independent Gradient Plasticity

Cohesive Band Model: a triaxiality-dependent cohesive model inside an implicit non-local damage to crack transition framework

On the characterization of drilling rotation in the 6 parameter resultant shell theory

Comparison of Models for Finite Plasticity

Cohesive band model: a triaxiality-dependent cohesive model for damage to crack transition in a non-local implicit discontinuous Galerkin framework

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.


SOIL MODELS: SAFETY FACTORS AND SETTLEMENTS

Engineering Sciences 241 Advanced Elasticity, Spring Distributed Thursday 8 February.

The Finite Element Method for the Analysis of Non-Linear and Dynamic Systems. Prof. Dr. Eleni Chatzi Lecture ST1-19 November, 2015

Heterogeneous Elasto-plasticity

Linearized theory of elasticity

1.050 Engineering Mechanics. Lecture 22: Isotropic elasticity

FEM for elastic-plastic problems

STRAIN LOCALIZATION AS BIFURCATION ELASTO-PLASTIC SOFTENING MATERIALS

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 2: Continuum mechanics

θ = θ (s,υ). (1.4) θ (s,υ) υ υ

Lecture #6: 3D Rate-independent Plasticity (cont.) Pressure-dependent plasticity

20. Rheology & Linear Elasticity

Towards Efficient Finite Element Model Review Dr. Richard Witasse, Plaxis bv (based on the original presentation of Dr.

Moving layers and interfaces : a thermodynamical approach of Wear Contact

Cracking in Quasi-Brittle Materials Using Isotropic Damage Mechanics

NDT&E Methods: UT. VJ Technologies CAVITY INSPECTION. Nondestructive Testing & Evaluation TPU Lecture Course 2015/16.

Card Variable MID RO E PR ECC QH0 FT FC. Type A8 F F F F F F F. Default none none none 0.2 AUTO 0.3 none none

HÅLLFASTHETSLÄRA, LTH Examination in computational materials modeling

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. EQUATIONS AND THEOREMS

ICES REPORT June The Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712

Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Elementary Viscous Flow

Integration of Rousselier s continuous ductile damage model

CRACK-TIP DRIVING FORCE The model evaluates the eect of inhomogeneities by nding the dierence between the J-integral on two contours - one close to th

Measurement of deformation. Measurement of elastic force. Constitutive law. Finite element method

Hypoplastic Cam-clay model

THE CAHN-HILLIARD EQUATION WITH A LOGARITHMIC POTENTIAL AND DYNAMIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

A hierarchy of higher order and higher grade continua Application to the plasticity and fracture of metallic foams

Summary of the Equations of Fluid Dynamics

Mathematical Background

Modelling the excavation damaged zone in Callovo-Oxfordian claystone with strain localisation

Numerical Simulation of Delamination in Composites via Incremental Energy Minimization

Stress analysis of a stepped bar

Fracture Mechanics, Damage and Fatigue Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics - Energetic Approach

ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOUR OF NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS ON VARYING DOMAINS

1.033/1.57 Mechanics of Material Systems (Mechanics and Durability of Solids I)

Continuum mechanics V. Constitutive equations. 1. Constitutive equation: definition and basic axioms

On a weighted total variation minimization problem

Mechanics of materials Lecture 4 Strain and deformation

and BV loc R N ; R d)

Waveform inversion and time-reversal imaging in attenuative TI media

MODELLING MIXED-MODE RATE-DEPENDENT DELAMINATION IN LAYERED STRUCTURES USING GEOMETRICALLY NONLINEAR BEAM FINITE ELEMENTS

STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION BY THE LEVEL SET METHOD

F7. Characteristic behavior of solids

Frequently Asked Questions

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 3: The elastic wave equation

Laboratory and Numerical Study of Sinkhole Collapse Mechanisms

Approximation of inverse boundary value problems by phase-field methods

Dipartimento di Matematica

Damage Mechanics-Based Models for High-Cycle Fatigue Life Prediction of Metals

Alternative numerical method in continuum mechanics COMPUTATIONAL MULTISCALE. University of Liège Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering

EQUIVALENT FRACTURE ENERGY CONCEPT FOR DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF PROTOTYPE RC GIRDERS

Powerful Modelling Techniques in Abaqus to Simulate

Singular integro-differential equations for a new model of fracture w. curvature-dependent surface tension

Mechanics PhD Preliminary Spring 2017

Experimentally Calibrating Cohesive Zone Models for Structural Automotive Adhesives

Weak Convergence Methods for Energy Minimization

16.21 Techniques of Structural Analysis and Design Spring 2005 Unit #8 Principle of Virtual Displacements

A MULTISCALE APPROACH IN TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION

Intro to Soil Mechanics: the what, why & how. José E. Andrade, Caltech

3. The linear 3-D elasticity mathematical model

RHEOLOGY & LINEAR ELASTICITY

THE STOKES SYSTEM R.E. SHOWALTER

Calculus of Variations Summer Term 2014

Symmetric Bending of Beams

Cracks Jacques Besson

1 Nonlinear deformation

Lecture Notes #10. The "paradox" of finite strain and preferred orientation pure vs. simple shear

Consider an elastic spring as shown in the Fig.2.4. When the spring is slowly

3D and 2D Formulations of Incremental Stress-Strain Relations for Granular Soils

Curvature-dependent energies: The elastic case

Module 2 Stresses in machine elements

12. Stresses and Strains

Chapter 5 Structural Elements: The truss & beam elements

THE TRENCH FLEXURE PROBLEM and

TIME-DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR OF PILE UNDER LATERAL LOAD USING THE BOUNDING SURFACE MODEL

Transcription:

Fracture models for elasto-plastic materials as limits of gradient damage models coupled with plasticity: the antiplane case Gianni Dal Maso, Gianluca Orlando (SISSA) Rodica Toader (Univ. Udine) R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 0 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity The starting point of our analysis is a gradient damage model coupled with plasticity, recently proposed by Alessi, Marigo, and Vidoli. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 1 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity The starting point of our analysis is a gradient damage model coupled with plasticity, recently proposed by Alessi, Marigo, and Vidoli. The relevant variables are the displacement u, R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 1 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity The starting point of our analysis is a gradient damage model coupled with plasticity, recently proposed by Alessi, Marigo, and Vidoli. The relevant variables are the displacement u, the elastic and plastic parts of the strain e and p, and R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 1 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity The starting point of our analysis is a gradient damage model coupled with plasticity, recently proposed by Alessi, Marigo, and Vidoli. The relevant variables are the displacement u, the elastic and plastic parts of the strain e and p, and the damage variable α. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 1 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity The starting point of our analysis is a gradient damage model coupled with plasticity, recently proposed by Alessi, Marigo, and Vidoli. The relevant variables are the displacement u, the elastic and plastic parts of the strain e and p, and the damage variable α. We consider the case of antiplane shear for an isotropic and homogeneous material: the reference configuration is a bounded open set in R n (n = 2 for three-dimensional bodies), R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 1 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity The starting point of our analysis is a gradient damage model coupled with plasticity, recently proposed by Alessi, Marigo, and Vidoli. The relevant variables are the displacement u, the elastic and plastic parts of the strain e and p, and the damage variable α. We consider the case of antiplane shear for an isotropic and homogeneous material: the reference configuration is a bounded open set in R n (n = 2 for three-dimensional bodies), u and α are scalar functions defined on, R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 1 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity The starting point of our analysis is a gradient damage model coupled with plasticity, recently proposed by Alessi, Marigo, and Vidoli. The relevant variables are the displacement u, the elastic and plastic parts of the strain e and p, and the damage variable α. We consider the case of antiplane shear for an isotropic and homogeneous material: the reference configuration is a bounded open set in R n (n = 2 for three-dimensional bodies), u and α are scalar functions defined on, e and p are vector functions from into R n. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 1 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity small strain elasto-plasticity: additive decomposition u = e + p. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 2 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity small strain elasto-plasticity: additive decomposition u = e + p. α min α 1, with α min ]0, 1[. α = 1 represents the sound material; α = α min is the maximum possible damage; R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 2 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity small strain elasto-plasticity: additive decomposition u = e + p. α min α 1, with α min ]0, 1[. α = 1 represents the sound material; α = α min is the maximum possible damage; constitutive relation: σ = αe elastic energy: Q(e, α) := 1 2 σ e dx = 1 2 α e 2 dx R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 2 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity small strain elasto-plasticity: additive decomposition u = e + p. α min α 1, with α min ]0, 1[. α = 1 represents the sound material; α = α min is the maximum possible damage; constitutive relation: σ = αe elastic energy: Q(e, α) := 1 σ e dx = 1 α e 2 dx 2 2 stress constraint: σ κ(α), κ: [0, 1] R is a continuous nondecreasing function, 0 κ(0) κ(1) = 1 and κ(α) > 0 for α > 0 plastic potential: H(p, α) := κ(α) p dx R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 2 / 10

Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity small strain elasto-plasticity: additive decomposition u = e + p. α min α 1, with α min ]0, 1[. α = 1 represents the sound material; α = α min is the maximum possible damage; constitutive relation: σ = αe elastic energy: Q(e, α) := 1 σ e dx = 1 α e 2 dx 2 2 stress constraint: σ κ(α), κ: [0, 1] R is a continuous nondecreasing function, 0 κ(0) κ(1) = 1 and κ(α) > 0 for α > 0 plastic potential: H(p, α) := κ(α) p dx energy dissipated by the damage process: W(α) := b W(α) dx + l α 2 dx b, l > 0, W : [0, 1] R is a continuous decreasing function with W(1) = 0. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 2 / 10

The minimum problem The model proposed by Alessi, Marigo, and Vidoli is based on the minimization of the total energy E(e, p, α) := Q(e, α) + H(p, α) + W(α), defined for e L 2 (; R n ), p L 1 (; R n ), and α H 1 (; [α min, 1]), with the constraint e + p = u for some u W 1,1 () satisfying prescribed boundary conditions. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 3 / 10

Dependence on ε We study the asymptotic behavior of the functional E(e, p, α) when the minimum problem forces the damage to be concentrated along sets of codimension one. This means that α must be close to 1 on great part of the domain and can be close to 0 just on sets of codimension one. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 4 / 10

Dependence on ε We study the asymptotic behavior of the functional E(e, p, α) when the minimum problem forces the damage to be concentrated along sets of codimension one. This means that α must be close to 1 on great part of the domain and can be close to 0 just on sets of codimension one. To force this behavior we assume that the three constants α min, b, l depend on a small parameter ε > 0 in a precise way: α min = δ ε, b = 1/ε, and l = ε, with δ ε /ε 0 as ε 0. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 4 / 10

Dependence on ε We study the asymptotic behavior of the functional E(e, p, α) when the minimum problem forces the damage to be concentrated along sets of codimension one. This means that α must be close to 1 on great part of the domain and can be close to 0 just on sets of codimension one. To force this behavior we assume that the three constants α min, b, l depend on a small parameter ε > 0 in a precise way: α min = δ ε, b = 1/ε, and l = ε, with δ ε /ε 0 as ε 0. Then E(e, p, α) becomes E ε (e, p, α) := Q(e, α) + H(p, α) + W ε (α) where Q(e, α) := 1 α e 2 dx, H(p, α) = κ(α) p dx, and 2 W ε (α) := 1 W(α) dx + ε α 2 dx. ε R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 4 / 10

The reduced functional We extend H to p M b (; R n ) which has better compactness properties, by setting H(p, α) := κ(α)d p. Therefore u BV() and e + p = Du = ul n + D s u. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 5 / 10

The reduced functional We extend H to p M b (; R n ) which has better compactness properties, by setting H(p, α) := κ(α)d p. Therefore u BV() and e + p = Du = ul n + D s u. We consider the functional F ε (u, α) defined for u BV() and α H 1 () by F ε (u, α):= min e,p {E ε(e, p, α):e L 2 (; R n ), p M b (; R n ), e + p=du} if δ ε α 1 and F ε (u, α):= + otherwise. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 5 / 10

The reduced functional We extend H to p M b (; R n ) which has better compactness properties, by setting H(p, α) := κ(α)d p. Therefore u BV() and e + p = Du = ul n + D s u. We consider the functional F ε (u, α) defined for u BV() and α H 1 () by F ε (u, α):= min e,p {E ε(e, p, α):e L 2 (; R n ), p M b (; R n ), e + p=du} if δ ε α 1 and F ε (u, α):= + otherwise. F ε represents the energy of the optimal additive decomposition of the displacement gradient (the minimum is achieved at a unique pair (e, p)). R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 5 / 10

The reduced functional The functional F ε (u, α) can be written in an integral form as F ε (u, α) := f ε (α, u ) dx + κ(α)d D s u + W ε (α), { 1 where f(α, t) := min 0 s t 2 αs2 + κ(α)(t s)} and f ε (α, t) := f(α, t) if δ ε α 1 f ε (α, t) := + otherwise. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 6 / 10

The reduced functional The functional F ε (u, α) can be written in an integral form as F ε (u, α) := f ε (α, u ) dx + κ(α)d D s u + W ε (α), { 1 where f(α, t) := min 0 s t 2 αs2 + κ(α)(t s)} and f ε (α, t) := f(α, t) if δ ε α 1 f ε (α, t) := + otherwise. The asymptotic behavior of the functionals F ε (u, α) is described by their Γ -limit as ε 0 in the space L 1 () L 1 (). We set F ε (u, α) = + if u / BV() or α / H 1 (). R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 6 / 10

The limit problem The limit problem is given by the functional F(u) := f(1, u ) dx + κ(1) D c u () + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1, J u defined for u in the space GBV() of generalized functions of bounded variation, where J u is the jump set of u, R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 7 / 10

The limit problem The limit problem is given by the functional F(u) := f(1, u ) dx + κ(1) D c u () + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1, J u defined for u in the space GBV() of generalized functions of bounded variation, where J u is the jump set of u, [u] is the difference between the traces of u on both sides of J u, R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 7 / 10

The limit problem The limit problem is given by the functional F(u) := f(1, u ) dx + κ(1) D c u () + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1, J u defined for u in the space GBV() of generalized functions of bounded variation, where J u is the jump set of u, [u] is the difference between the traces of u on both sides of J u, D c u is the Cantor part of Du, R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 7 / 10

The limit problem The limit problem is given by the functional F(u) := f(1, u ) dx + κ(1) D c u () + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1, J u defined for u in the space GBV() of generalized functions of bounded variation, where J u is the jump set of u, [u] is the difference between the traces of u on both sides of J u, D c u is the Cantor part of Du, R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 7 / 10

The limit problem The limit problem is given by the functional F(u) := f(1, u ) dx + κ(1) D c u () + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1, J u defined for u in the space GBV() of generalized functions of bounded variation, where J u is the jump set of u, [u] is the difference between the traces of u on both sides of J u, D c u is the Cantor part of Du, 1 2 f(1, t) = t2 if t κ(1) for every t 0, and κ(1)t κ(1)2 2 if t κ(1) R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 7 / 10

The limit problem The limit problem is given by the functional F(u) := f(1, u ) dx + κ(1) D c u () + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1, J u defined for u in the space GBV() of generalized functions of bounded variation, where J u is the jump set of u, [u] is the difference between the traces of u on both sides of J u, D c u is the Cantor part of Du, 1 2 f(1, t) = t2 if t κ(1) for every t 0, and κ(1)t κ(1)2 Ψ(t) := min 2 if t κ(1) { γ W (0), min 0<α 1 with γ W (α) defined by γ W (α) := 4 1 α [ κ(α)t + γ W (α)] }, W(s) ds for every α [0, 1]. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 7 / 10

The purely elastic problem Under the constraint p = 0 (i.e., e = u), which corresponds formally to κ(α) = + for every α min α 1, this problem has been studied by Ambrosio and Tortorelli. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 8 / 10

The purely elastic problem Under the constraint p = 0 (i.e., e = u), which corresponds formally to κ(α) = + for every α min α 1, this problem has been studied by Ambrosio and Tortorelli. In this case F ε (u, α) := 1 2 α u 2 dx + W ε (α). R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 8 / 10

The purely elastic problem Under the constraint p = 0 (i.e., e = u), which corresponds formally to κ(α) = + for every α min α 1, this problem has been studied by Ambrosio and Tortorelli. In this case The limit functional is F ε (u, α) := 1 2 F(u) := 1 2 α u 2 dx + W ε (α). u 2 dx + γ W (0)H n 1 (J u ), if u GSBV() (i.e., D c u = 0), while F(u) = + if D c u 0. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 8 / 10

The fracture term In our case F(u) := f(1, u ) dx + κ(1) D c u () + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1 with J [ u Ψ(t) := min {γ W (0), min 0<α 1 κ(α)t + γ W (α)] } for every t 0. γ W (0) κ(1)t Ψ(1)t 0 1 Ψ is concave; R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 9 / 10

The fracture term In our case F(u) := f(1, u ) dx + κ(1) D c u () + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1 with J [ u Ψ(t) := min {γ W (0), min 0<α 1 κ(α)t + γ W (α)] } for every t 0. γ W (0) κ(1)t Ψ(1)t 0 1 Ψ is concave; Ψ(1)t Ψ(t) t if t is small; R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 9 / 10

The fracture term In our case F(u) := f(1, u ) dx + κ(1) D c u () + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1 with J [ u Ψ(t) := min {γ W (0), min 0<α 1 κ(α)t + γ W (α)] } for every t 0. γ W (0) κ(1)t Ψ(1)t 0 1 Ψ is concave; Ψ(1)t Ψ(t) t if t is small; Ψ (0) = κ(1); R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 9 / 10

The fracture term In our case F(u) := f(1, u ) dx + κ(1) D c u () + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1 with J [ u Ψ(t) := min {γ W (0), min 0<α 1 κ(α)t + γ W (α)] } for every t 0. γ W (0) κ(1)t Ψ(1)t 0 1 Ψ is concave; Ψ(1)t Ψ(t) t if t is small; Ψ (0) = κ(1); Ψ(t) = γ W (0) if κ(0)t γ W (0); R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 9 / 10

The fracture term In our case F(u) := f(1, u ) dx + κ(1) D c u () + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1 with J [ u Ψ(t) := min {γ W (0), min 0<α 1 κ(α)t + γ W (α)] } for every t 0. γ W (0) κ(1)t Ψ(1)t 0 1 Ψ is concave; Ψ(1)t Ψ(t) t if t is small; Ψ (0) = κ(1); Ψ(t) = γ W (0) if κ(0)t γ W (0); lim t + Ψ(t) = γ W (0). R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 9 / 10

Theorem [Dal Maso-Orlando-T. 2015] The functionals F ε Γ -converge in L 1 () L 1 () to the functional F 0 : L 1 () L 1 () [0, + ] defined by { F(u) if u GBV() and α = 1 L n -a.e. in, F 0 (u, α) = + otherwise. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 10 / 10

Theorem [Dal Maso-Orlando-T. 2015] The functionals F ε Γ -converge in L 1 () L 1 () to the functional F 0 : L 1 () L 1 () [0, + ] defined by { F(u) if u GBV() and α = 1 L n -a.e. in, Moreover, F 0 (u, α) = F(u) = min e,p + otherwise. { 1 2 } e 2 dx + κ(1) p ( \ J u ) + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1, J u where the infimum is taken among all e L 2 (; R n ), p M b (; R n ) such that Du = e + p as measures on \ J u. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 10 / 10

Theorem [Dal Maso-Orlando-T. 2015] The functionals F ε Γ -converge in L 1 () L 1 () to the functional F 0 : L 1 () L 1 () [0, + ] defined by { F(u) if u GBV() and α = 1 L n -a.e. in, Moreover, F 0 (u, α) = F(u) = min e,p + otherwise. { 1 2 } e 2 dx + κ(1) p ( \ J u ) + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1, J u where the infimum is taken among all e L 2 (; R n ), p M b (; R n ) such that Du = e + p as measures on \ J u. Hence F can be interpreted as the total energy of an elasto-plastic material with a cohesive fracture. R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 10 / 10

Theorem [Dal Maso-Orlando-T. 2015] The functionals F ε Γ -converge in L 1 () L 1 () to the functional F 0 : L 1 () L 1 () [0, + ] defined by { F(u) if u GBV() and α = 1 L n -a.e. in, Moreover, F 0 (u, α) = F(u) = min e,p + otherwise. { 1 2 } e 2 dx + κ(1) p ( \ J u ) + Ψ( [u] ) dh n 1, J u where the infimum is taken among all e L 2 (; R n ), p M b (; R n ) such that Du = e + p as measures on \ J u. Hence F can be interpreted as the total energy of an elasto-plastic material with a cohesive fracture. G. Dal Maso, G. Orlando, R. T.: Fracture models for elasto-plastic materials as limits of gradient damage models coupled with plasticity: the antiplane case. http://cvgmt.sns.it/paper/2677/ R. Toader (Univ. Udine) Fracture in elasto-plastic materials December 17, 2015 10 / 10