6D SCFTs and Group Theory. Tom Rudelius Harvard University

Similar documents
6D SCFTs and Group Theory. Tom Rudelius IAS

6d theories and nilpotent orbits in Lie algebras

SCFTs, Compact CY 3-folds, and Topological Strings

5d SCFTs and instanton partition functions

Web of threefold bases in F-theory and machine learning

6d SCFTs and Tao diagrams

Prarit Agarwal (Seoul National University) International winter school : "Partition Functions and Automorphic Forms", 2018

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 20 Jun 2018

Spectral Networks and Their Applications. Caltech, March, 2012

Surface Defects and the BPS Spectrum of 4d N=2 Theories

Rigid Holography and 6d N=(2,0) Theories on AdS 5 xs 1

Dualities and 5-Brane Webs for 5d rank 2 SCFTs

On Flux Quantization in F-Theory

Topological reduction of supersymmetric gauge theories and S-duality

Current Algebra Constraints on Supersymmetric Quantum Field Theories

Little strings and T-duality

The Toric SO(10) F-theory Landscape

Solution Set 8 Worldsheet perspective on CY compactification

Techniques for exact calculations in 4D SUSY gauge theories

Flux Compactification of Type IIB Supergravity

Half BPS solutions in type IIB and M-theory

Introduction to defects in Landau-Ginzburg models

THE MASTER SPACE OF N=1 GAUGE THEORIES

2d-4d wall-crossing and hyperholomorphic bundles

Generalized Global Symmetries

E 6 Yukawa couplings in F-theory as D-brane instanton effects

Symmetries of K3 sigma models

Heterotic Brane World

Elements of Topological M-Theory

Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee

Looking Beyond Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds. Work in progress with Hans Jockers, Joshua M. Lapan, Maurico Romo and David R.

Algebraic structure of the IR limit of massive d=2 N=(2,2) theories. collaboration with Davide Gaiotto & Edward Witten

Aspects of (0,2) theories

Dynamics of Multiple Kaluza-Klein Monopoles in M- and String Theory

N = 2 CHERN-SIMONS MATTER THEORIES: RG FLOWS AND IR BEHAVIOR. Silvia Penati. Perugia, 25/6/2010

String Theory and Generalized Geometries

Instantons and Donaldson invariants

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 10 Jun 2015

Non-Geometric Calabi- Yau Backgrounds

Exercises on chapter 1

BPS States in N=4. Ashoke Sen. Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India

F-theory and the classification of elliptic Calabi-Yau manifolds

Some Issues in F-Theory Geometry

Anomalies and Remnant Symmetries in Heterotic Constructions. Christoph Lüdeling

What ideas/theories are physicists exploring today?

Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models

Four Lectures on Web Formalism and Categorical Wall-Crossing. collaboration with Davide Gaiotto & Edward Witten

BPS states, Wall-crossing and Quivers

Three-Charge Black Holes and ¼ BPS States in Little String Theory

Web Formalism and the IR limit of massive 2D N=(2,2) QFT. collaboration with Davide Gaiotto & Edward Witten

Cascading to the MSSM. The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.

Stringy Instantons, Backreaction and Dimers.

Generalized N = 1 orientifold compactifications

6d Superconformal Field Theories

Emergent Quantum Criticality

A Classification of 3-Family Grand Unification in String Theory I. The SO(10) and E 6 Models. Abstract

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

Knot Contact Homology, Chern-Simons Theory, and Topological Strings

arxiv:hep-th/ v3 25 Aug 1999

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Supercurrents. Nathan Seiberg IAS

The Langlands dual group and Electric-Magnetic Duality

Knots and Mirror Symmetry. Mina Aganagic UC Berkeley

A Chern-Simons Pandemic

Sphere Partition Functions, Topology, the Zamolodchikov Metric

The global gauge group structure of F-theory compactifications with U(1)s

F-theory effective physics via M-theory. Thomas W. Grimm!! Max Planck Institute for Physics (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut)! Munich

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER

Classification of complete N =2 supersymmetric theories in 4 dimensions

Brane Tilings: NSVZ Beta Function

Instanton effective action in - background and D3/D(-1)-brane system in R-R background

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 3 Jul 2015

A Landscape of Field Theories

Gauge Theory and Mirror Symmetry

Aspects of SCFTs and their susy deformations

Fun with 2-Group Symmetry. Po-Shen Hsin California Institute of Technology October 13, Benini, Córdova, PH

Some Tools for Exploring Supersymmetric RG Flows

Deconstructing the BPS sector of (2,0) Theories

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

A Supergravity Dual for 4d SCFT s Universal Sector

Lecture 25 Superconformal Field Theory

F-theory and Particle Physics

Direct generation of a Majorana mass for the Neutron from exotic instantons!

Exact Solutions of 2d Supersymmetric gauge theories

4D Quiver Gauge theory combinatorics and 2D TFTs

Heterotic Standard Models

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 12 Dec 1996

Free fields, Quivers and Riemann surfaces

Hilbert Series and Its Applications to SUSY Gauge Theories

Deformations and rigidity of lattices in solvable Lie groups

The Classification of Automorphism Groups of Rational Elliptic Surfaces With Section

Fixing all moduli in F-theory and type II strings

David R. Morrison. String Phenomenology 2008 University of Pennsylvania 31 May 2008

Instantons in string theory via F-theory

Mapping 6D N=1 supergravities to F-theory

Varieties of Characters

Self-Dual Strings of Six-Dimensional SCFTs

Representations and Linear Actions

Difference Painlevé equations from 5D gauge theories

Transcription:

6D SCFTs and Group Theory Tom Rudelius Harvard University

Based On 1502.05405/hep-th with Jonathan Heckman, David Morrison, and Cumrun Vafa 1506.06753/hep-th with Jonathan Heckman 1601.04078/hep-th with Jonathan Heckman, Alessandro Tomasiello 1605.08045/hep-th with David Morrison 1612.06399/hep-th with Noppadol Mekareeya, Alessandro Tomasiello work in progress with Fabio Apruzzi, Jonathan Heckman

Outline I. Classification of 6D SCFTs i. Tensor Branches/Strings ii. Gauge Algebras/Particles II. 6D SCFTs and Homomorphisms i. su(2)! g ADE ii. ADE! E 8 III. 6D SCFTs and Automorphism Groups i. Automorphism Groups ii. Geometric Phases

The Big Picture Group Theory 6D SCFTs Geometry

What is a 6D SCFT? S=supersymmetric (8 or 16 supercharges)! C=conformal symmetry! FT=Field theory in 5+1 dimensions

Classification of 6D SCFTs

Classification of 6D SCFTs 6D SCFTs can be classified via F-theory Nearly all F-theory conditions can be phrased in field theory terms 6D SCFTs = Generalized Quivers

Classification of 6D SCFTs Looks like chemistry Atoms Radicals n 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2

What is F-theory? Vafa 96 IIB: R 9,1 with position-dependent coupling = C 0 + ie T 2 R 9,1

All known 6D theories have F-theory avatar

n

Dirac Pairing for String Charge Lattice Intersection Matrix! Dirac Pairing 4 1 4 IJ negative definite, Curves contractible

Blow-down Operations m n n m 1 n 1 n 1

Coarse Classification of Bases* Heckman, Morrison, Vafa 13 (2,0) SCFT, SU(2) (1,0) SCFT ) U(2) *Bases related by blow-downs/blow-ups have same U(2)

Coarse Classification of Bases Heckman, Morrison, Vafa 13 x 1 x 2 x 3 x r p q = x 1 1 x 2... 1 x r :(z 1,z 2 ) 7! (e 2 i/p z 1,e 2 iq/p z 2 ) B 2 = C 2 /

Complete Classification of Bases

n

Minimal Gauge Algebras su 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 12 f 4 e 8

Fiber Enhancements 3 + 8v, 8s, 8c 4 + 2 fundamentals 3 + 2 spinors su 3 3 4 + 2 fundamentals 4

6D SCFTs and Homomorphisms

6D SCFTs and Homomorphisms Large classes of 6D SCFTs have connections to structures in group theory The correspondence has been verified explicitly Hom(su 2, g ADE ) Hom( ADE,E 8 ) M5-brane theories T 2 -fibered CY3

M5-Branes Probing C 2 / ADE N M5s C 2 / ADE 10 g g g g g 2 2 2 2 {z } N 1 g

M5-Branes Probing C 2 / ADE A k 1 : su k su k su k su k su k 2 2 2 D k : so 2k so 2k so 2k 2 2 so 2k sp k 4 so 2k sp k 4 so 2k sp k 4 so 2k 1 4 1 4 1 so 2k E 6 : e 6 e 6 2 e 6 su 3 su 3 1 3 1 6 1 3 1 e 6 e 6

Nilpotent Deformations Matrix of normal deformations characterizes positions of 7-branes View intersection points of CP 1 in base as marked points Let adjoint field have singular behavior at marked points ) Hitchin system coupled to defects: @ A = X p µ (p) C (p) F +[, ]= X p µ (p) R (p)

Nilpotent Deformations Split µ C = µ s + µ n, consider nilpotent part, get su 2 algebra:!! J + = µ C J = µ C Adjoint vevs µ C dz z J 3 = µ R ) Classified by Hom(su(2), g) (equivalently, by nilpotent orbits J + ) µ n

6D SCFTs and Hom(su(2),A k 1 ) Hom(su(2),A k 1 ) labeled by partitions of k: su 4 su 4 su 4 su 4 2 2 2 su 2 su 3 su 4 su 3 su 4 su 4 2 2 2 su 2 2 2 2 su 2 su 3 su 2 su 4 su 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 su 2

Partial Ordering of Nilpotent Orbits O µ O, Ōµ O, µ, P m i=1 µt i P m i=1 T i 8m > > > >

Renormalization Group Flows High Energy Short Distance T UV T IR Low Energy Long Distance

Partial Ordering of Theories Can define a partial ordering on theories using RG flows: T 1 T 2, 9 flow T 1 T 2

Nilpotent Orbit Ordering Matches RG Ordering! su 4 su 4 2 su 4 su 4 2 2 su 2 su 3 2 su 4 su 4 2 2 su 2 2 su 4 su 4 2 2 su 2 su 2 2 su 3 su 4 2 2 2 su 2 su 3 2 2

6D SCFTs and Hom(su(2),D k )

6D SCFTs and Hom(su(2),E 6 )

Nilpotent Orbits and Global Symmetries Consider nilpotent orbit O µ 2 g Let F (µ) be subgroup of G commuting with nilpotent element Claim: F (µ) is the global symmetry of the 6D SCFT associated with µ E.g. su 3 su 2 4 1 3 1 6 so 7 su 2 2 1 6

6D SCFTs and Hom( ADE,E 8 ) Consider M5-branes probing Horava-Witten wall and singularity!!! N! M5s E 8 Wall!! C 2 / ADE C 2 / ADE Boundary data ' flat E 8 connections on S 3 / ADE 10

6D SCFTs and Hom( ADE,E 8 ) For trivial boundary data, get 6D SCFT:!!!! e 8 g g g g 1 2 2 2 {z } N For non-trivial boundary data, global symmetry is broken to a subgroup g g g g g L 1 2 2 2 {z } N g g

6D SCFTs and Hom( ADE,E 8 ) Flat E 8 connections on S 3 / ADE, Hom( ADE,E 8 ) E.g. A 2, Hom(Z 3,E 8 ): su 2 su 3 su 3 e 8 1 2 2 2 2 su 2 su 3 su 3 su 3 e 7 1 2 2 2 2 su 2 su 3 su 3 su 3 su 3 so 14 1 2 2 2 2 su 3 su 3 su 3 su 3 e 6 1 2 2 2 2 su 3 su 9 su 3 su 3 su 3 su 3 su 3 1 2 2 2 2

6D SCFTs and Homomorphisms Large classes of 6D SCFTs have connections to structures in group theory The correspondence has been verified explicitly g L g g g g 2 2 2 2 g g L g g g g 1 2 2 2 g Hom(su(2), g) Hom( g,e 8 )

6D SCFTs and Automorphism Groups

6D SCFTs and Automorphism Groups The Dirac pairing of a 6D SCFT has an associated automorphism group Aut( ), which is calculable Elements of Aut( ) Green-Schwarz Couplings Geometric Phases of B2

Automorphism Groups Given 2 GL(n, Z), define Aut( ) by Aut( ) ={µ 2 GL(n, Z) µ T µ = }.

Automorphism Groups of 6D SCFTs For 6D SCFT, Dirac pairing, Aut( ) = Aut( end ) Aut(I k ) Dirac pairing after blowing down all -1 curves Dirac pairing associated with k blow-downs

E.g. Automorphism Groups of 6D SCFTs Aut( 4 1 4 ) = Aut( 3 3 ) Aut(I 1 ) Aut( 1 2 2 ) = Aut( 1 3 1 ) = Aut(I 3 )

Automorphism Groups of 6D SCFTs In general, n 1 n 2 n 3 Aut( 2 2 2 2 2 ) {z } {z } m 1 m 2 = Z 2 o S m1 +1 S m2 +1... Aut(I k )=S k o Z k 2

Outer Automorphisms For a symmetric endpoint, Aut( ) contains an additional factor associated with the quiver symmetry: Aut( 2 32 2 ) = Z 2 o (Z 2 o (S 2 S 2 )) Symmetry of quiver from left -2 curve from right -2 curve

Green-Schwarz Couplings Group elements label distinct choices!!!!! for Green-Schwarz coupling L 6 Z µ IJ B I ^ Tr(F J ^ F J ) I GS Tr(F I ^ F I )µ JI 1 JK µ KLTr(F L ^ F L ) µ IJ 2Aut( ), Dirac Quantization

(2,0) Automorphism Groups For a (2,0) SCFT, Aut( g ) = Aut(g) Group elements Permutations of M5-branes 1 2 3 4 1 3 4 2

Phases of 6D SCFTs For a general (1,0) SCFT, group!!! elements label tensor branch phases: X µ T IJ I > 0 These in turn correspond to geometric! phases of the base. I B 2

Summary So far 6D SCFTs have been classified There are remarkable relationships between 6D SCFTs and two classes of homomorphisms Phases of 6D SCFTs are labeled by automorphism groups of their Dirac pairing

Further Research In the future Can we classify full set of 6D RG Flows in terms of group theory data? Can we understand compactifications to lower dimensions? Can we understand these algebraic/geometric correspondences from a purely mathematical perspective?