NSP Electric - Minnesota Annual Report Peak Demand and Annual Electric Consumption Forecast

Similar documents
RD1 - Page 469 of 578

Multivariate Regression Model Results

LOADS, CUSTOMERS AND REVENUE

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *

Introduction to Forecasting

Demand Forecasting Models

Design of a Weather-Normalization Forecasting Model

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * *

Abram Gross Yafeng Peng Jedidiah Shirey

peak half-hourly New South Wales

As included in Load Forecast Review Report (Page 1):

From Sales to Peak, Getting It Right Long-Term Demand Forecasting

peak half-hourly Tasmania

2013 Weather Normalization Survey. Itron, Inc El Camino Real San Diego, CA

SHORT TERM LOAD FORECASTING

Statement of indicative wholesale water charges and charges scheme

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

Gorge Area Demand Forecast. Prepared for: Green Mountain Power Corporation 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, Vermont Prepared by:

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GREGORY TEPLOW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Interstate Power & Light (IPL) 2013/2014

Winter Season Resource Adequacy Analysis Status Report

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

SMART GRID FORECASTING

March 5, British Columbia Utilities Commission 6 th Floor, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3

2018 Annual Review of Availability Assessment Hours

Chapter 3. Regression-Based Models for Developing Commercial Demand Characteristics Investigation

2013 WEATHER NORMALIZATION SURVEY. Industry Practices

Load Forecasting Technical Workshop. January 30, 2004

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

REVISED UPDATED PREPARED DIRECT SAFETY ENHANCEMENT COST ALLOCATION TESTIMONY OF GARY LENART SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND

Short-Term Job Growth Impacts of Hurricane Harvey on the Gulf Coast and Texas

Variables For Each Time Horizon

2006 IRP Technical Workshop Load Forecasting Tuesday, January 24, :00 am 3:30 pm (Pacific) Meeting Summary

Page No. (and line no. if applicable):

2015 Summer Readiness. Bulk Power Operations

Design of a Weather- Normalization Forecasting Model

Lecture Prepared By: Mohammad Kamrul Arefin Lecturer, School of Business, North South University

Normalization of Peak Demand for an Electric Utility using PROC MODEL

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OREGON UE 294. Load Forecast PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. Direct Testimony and Exhibits of

Table 01A. End of Period End of Period End of Period Period Average Period Average Period Average

Outage Coordination and Business Practices

TRANSMISSION BUSINESS LOAD FORECAST AND METHODOLOGY

MISO Independent Load Forecast Update

Distributed Generation. Retail Distributed Generation

WEATHER NORMALIZATION METHODS AND ISSUES. Stuart McMenamin Mark Quan David Simons

peak half-hourly South Australia

Use of Normals in Load Forecasting at National Grid

Into Avista s Electricity Forecasts. Presented by Randy Barcus Avista Chief Economist Itron s Energy Forecaster s Group Meeting

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR NIGERIA

MONTE CARLO SIMULATION RISK ANALYSIS AND ITS APPLICATION IN MODELLING THE INCLEMENT WEATHER FOR PROGRAMMING CIVIL ENGINEERING PROJECTS

WRF Webcast. Improving the Accuracy of Short-Term Water Demand Forecasts

Estimation of Energy Demand Taking into Account climate change in Southern Québec

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: May 5, 2017

Operations Management

Forecasting Product Sales for Masters Energy Oil and Gas Using. Different Forecasting Methods

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: October 21, 2016

Euro-indicators Working Group

PROJECT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: August 17, 2018

APPENDIX 7.4 Capacity Value of Wind Resources

FORECASTING COARSE RICE PRICES IN BANGLADESH

The Dayton Power and Light Company Load Profiling Methodology Revised 7/1/2017

Determine the trend for time series data

Taking the garbage out of energy modeling through calibration

Ontario Demand Forecast

U.S. Outlook For October and Winter Thursday, September 19, 2013

Lecture Prepared By: Mohammad Kamrul Arefin Lecturer, School of Business, North South University

2013 FORECAST ACCURACY BENCHMARKING SURVEY AND ENERGY

Four Basic Steps for Creating an Effective Demand Forecasting Process

Time Series Model of Photovoltaic Generation for Distribution Planning Analysis. Jorge Valenzuela

2001 ANNUAL REPORT on INTERBASIN TRANSFERS for RTP South and the Towns of Cary, Apex, and Morrisville

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: September 23, 2016

Proposed Changes to the PJM Load Forecast Model

Defining Normal Weather for Energy and Peak Normalization

Seasonality in macroeconomic prediction errors. An examination of private forecasters in Chile

IMPROVING THE ACCURACY OF RUNWAY ALLOCATION IN AIRCRAFT NOISE PREDICTION

CAISO Participating Intermittent Resource Program for Wind Generation

Average 175, , , , , , ,046 YTD Total 1,098,649 1,509,593 1,868,795 1,418, ,169 1,977,225 2,065,321

Average 175, , , , , , ,940 YTD Total 944,460 1,284,944 1,635,177 1,183, ,954 1,744,134 1,565,640

Sales Analysis User Manual

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Global Climates. Name Date

A FACILITY MANAGER S INTRODUCTION TO WEATHER CORRECTION FOR UTILITY BILL TRACKING. John Avina, Director Abraxas Energy Consulting

Virginia Basis Tables for Corn, Soybeans, and Wheat

In the Matter of Oter Tail Power Company s 2005 Integrated Resource Plan Compliance Filing Docket No. E-017/RP

Sections 01, 02, & 04 (Bressoud and Ehren) 9 October, 2015

SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 2013 TRIENNIAL COST ALLOCATION PROCEEDING (A ) (DATA REQUEST DRA-MPS-2)

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

CHAPTER 5 - QUEENSLAND FORECASTS

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: July 20, 2018

2016 Meteorology Summary

Corn Basis Information By Tennessee Crop Reporting District

BUSI 460 Suggested Answers to Selected Review and Discussion Questions Lesson 7

Battery Energy Storage

Monthly Sales Weather Normalization and Estimating Unbilled Sales. Al Bass Kansas City Power & Light EFG Meeting Las Vegas, NV April 2-3, 2014

Public Disclosure Copy

Statistics for IT Managers

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Transcription:

Page 1 of 5 7610.0320 - Forecast Methodology NSP Electric - Minnesota Annual Report Peak Demand and Annual Electric Consumption Forecast OVERALL METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK Xcel Energy prepared its forecast by major customer class and jurisdiction, using a variety of statistical and econometric techniques. The NSP System serves five jurisdictions. Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota are served by Northern States Power Company. Wisconsin and Michigan are served by Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation (NSPW). The overall methodological framework is "model oriented". The NSP and NSPW Systems operate as an integrated system. The forecast is referred to as the 2012 Budget (Spring 2011). SPECIFIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES 1. Econometric Analysis. Xcel Energy used econometric analysis to develop jurisdictional MWh sales forecasts at the customer meter for the following sectors: a. Residential without Space Heating; b. Residential with Space Heating; c. Small Commercial and Industrial; d. Large Commercial and Industrial (excluding South Dakota and Michigan); e. Public Street and Highway Lighting (excluding Michigan); f. Other Sales to Public Authorities (only Minnesota). Xcel Energy also used econometric analysis to develop the total system MW demand forecast. 2. Trend analysis was used for all other sectors, which includes South Dakota and Michigan Large Commercial and Industrial, Michigan Public Street and Highway Lighting, Other Sales to Public Authorities (excluding Minnesota), Interdepartmental sales, and Municipals (firm Wholesale). 3. Loss Factor Methodology. Loss factors by jurisdiction were used to convert the sales forecasts into system energy requirements (at the generator). 4. Judgment. Judgment is inherent to the development of any forecast. Whenever possible, Xcel Energy used quantitative models to structure its judgment in the forecasting process. The sales forecasts are estimates of LgWh levels measured at the customer meter. They do not include line or other losses. The various jurisdictional class forecasts are summed to yield the total system sales forecast. Native energy requirements are measured at the generator and include line and other losses. Xcel Energy creates native energy requirements based on the sales forecasts. A system loss factor for each jurisdiction, developed based on average historical losses, is applied to the sales forecast to calculate total losses. The sum of the MWh sales and losses equals native energy requirements. The native energy requirements, along with peak producing weather and binary variables, are then used as independent variables within an econometric model to forecast MW peak demand for the Xcel Energy North System. 1Forecast Documentation Page 1 of 5

Page 2 of 5 MODELS USED 1. Residential Econometric Models. Sales to the residential sectors represent 28.8% of its total NSP System electric sales in 2010. Residential sales are divided into with space heating and without space heating customer classes for the Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota jurisdictions. Ordinary Least Squares models using historical data are developed for each residential sector. A variety of independent variables are used in the models, including: Number of customers; Gross Metro or State Product for respective jurisdiction; Actual heating and temperature humidity index (THI) degree days; Number of monthly billing days. 2. Small Commercial and Industrial Econometric Models. The small commercial and industrial sector represents 42.2% of NSP System electric sales in 2010. The models are ordinary least squares regressions using historical data. The models include a combination of variables, including the following: Number of small commercial and industrial customers; Gross Metro or State Product for respective jurisdiction; Employment for respective jurisdiction; Actual heating and temperature humidity index (THI) degree days; Number of monthly billing days. 3. Large CommerciaI and IndustriaI Econometric ModeIs. Sales to the large commercial and industrial sector represent 26.4 % of NSP System electric sales in 2010. The models are OLS regressions using historical data and a combination of variables, including the following: Industrial Production for respective jurisdiction; Employment for respective jurisdiction; Number of monthly billing days; Indicator variables such as CI reclassification. 4. Others. Sales to the "Others" sector represent 0.7 % of NSP System electric sales in 2010. This sector includes Public Street and Highway Lighting (PSHL), Sales to Public Authorities (OSPA) and Interdepartmental (IDS) sales. The Street Lighting sector forecasts are developed using OLS regressions using historical data and Population or Households, along with seasonal variables. Because the Sales to Public Authorities class and the Interdepartmental class represent a very small portion of the total sales, trend analysis is used and very little growth is forecast for these two classes. 5. Municipals. Sales to the Municipal utility sector represent 2.0 % of NSP System electric sales in 2010. The municipal class is forecast using separate trend analysis at the individual customer level for NSP and NSPW. The forecast of these municipal customers only includes fwm wholesale customer usage. 6. Peak Demand ModeI. An econometric model is developed to forecast base peak demand for the entire planning period. The model includes a combination of variables, including the following: Weather normalized native energy requirements Peak producing weather by month Binary variables. 2Forecast Documentation Page 2 of 5

Page 3 of 5 METHODOLOGY STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES The strength of the process Xcel Energy used for this forecast is the richness of the information obtained during the analysis. Xcel Energy s econometric forecasting models are based on sound economic and statistical theory. Historical modeling and forecast drivers are based on economic and demographic variables that are easily measured and analyzed. The use of models by class and jurisdiction gives greater insight into how the NSP System is growing, thereby providing better information for decisions to be made in the areas of generation, transmission, marketing, conservation, and load management. With respect to accuracy, forecasts of this duration are inherently uncertain. Planners and decision makers must be keenly aware of the inherent risk that accompanies long-term forecasts. They must also develop plans that are robust over a wide range of future outcomes. DATA FOR FORECASTS Xcel Energy used internal and external data to create its MWh sales and MW peak demand forecast. Historical MWh sales are taken from Xcel Energy s internal company records, fed by its billing system. Historical coincident net peak demand data is obtained through company records. The load management estimate is added to the net peak demand to derive the base peak demand. Through 2007 weather data (dry bulb temperature and dew points) were collected from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for the Minneapolis/St. Paul, Fargo, Sioux Fails, and Eau Claire areas. Beginning in 2008 weather data has been collected from weatherunderground.com for the same locations. The heating degree-days and THI degreedays were calculated internally based on this weather data. Economic and demographic data was obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Commerce, and the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Typically they are accessed from Global Insight, Inc. data banks, and reflect the most recent values of those series at the time of modeling. DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS The regression model results for the residential and commercial and industrial classes are reduced to account for the expected incremental impacts of demand-side management ("DSM") programs. The forecast of the impact of new DSM programs (excluding Saver s Switch) is developed by Xcel Energy s DSM Regulatory Strategy and Planning Department. The impacts are converted by class from calendar month energy to billing month sales volumes. The resulting sales volumes are used to reduce the class level sales forecasts that result from the regression modeling process. Impacts from all program installations through 2010 are assumed to be imbedded in the historical data, so only new program installations are included in the DSM adjustment. 3Forecast Documentation Page 3 of 5

Page 4 of 5 An additional adjustment was made to the current forecast to account for recent code modifications in air conditioning standards for businesses. This effect was included as it significantly reduced the potential conservation for business cooling measures identified in the 2010 Statewide Potential Study performed by Summit Blue Consulting when compared to previous potential studies using the former code. The result was a significantly lower peak demand reduction from conservation scenarios than previous sales forecasts included. Allocation of demand and energy by month based on load shape used for Business Cooling in 2010-2012 DSM Plan. The Company s Saver s Switch program results in short-term interruptions of service designed to reduce system capacity requirements rather than permanent reductions in energy use, so it is not considered here. DATA ADJUSTMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS 1. Weather Adjustments. Xcel Energy adjusted its monthly weather data to reflect billing schedules. Therefore, the monthly weather data corresponds exactly with the billing month schedule. 2. Economic Adjustments. All price data and related economic series were deflated to constant dollars., Demand Forecast Wholesale Adjustment. An adjustment to account for terminating firm wholesale customer contracts was incorporated into the development of the peak demand forecast. Estimated coincident peak demand and energy for wholesale customers whose contracts terminated in 2009 and 2010 were added to the regression model data to create a consistent data series for both demand and energy. The estimated demand adjustment was then removed from the demand forecast. A further adjustment was made to the forecast period for additional knmvn contracts with firm wholesale customers that will terminate after December 2010. ASSUMPTIONS AND SPECIAL INFORMATION Xcel Energy believes that its process is a reasonable and workable one to use as a guide for its future energy and load requirements. The underlying assumptions used to prepare Xcel Energy s median forecast are as follows: Demographic Assumption. Population or household projections are essential in the development of the long-range forecast. The forecasts of customers are derived from population and household projections provided by Global Insight, Inc., and reviewed by Xcel Energy staff. Xcel Energy customer growth mirrors demographic growth over the forecast period. 2. Weather Assumption. Xcel Energy assumed "normal" weather in the forecast horizon. Normal weather is defined as the average weather pattern over the 20-year period from 1991-2010. The variability of weather is an important source of uncertainty. Xcel Energy s energy forecasts are based on the assumption that the normal weather conditions will prevail in the forecast horizon. Weather-related demand uncertainties are not treated explicitly in this forecast. 4Forecast Documentation Page 4 of 5

Page 5 of 5 3. Loss Factor Assumptions. The loss factors are important to convert the sales forecast to energy requirements. Xcel Energy uses a historical average loss factor for each jurisdiction, and assumes it will not change in the future. FORECAST COORDINATION Xcel Energy reports its forecast to the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin as part of its Strategic Energy Assessment (SEA) process. In this process, the Wisconsin portion of the total Xcel Energy system load is combined with other Wisconsin electric utilities to form a statewide Wisconsin forecast. 5Forecast Documentation Page 5 of 5

Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation Environmental Improvement Rider Sales Volume - State of Minnesota (April 2011 Forecast Vintage) 2012 EIR Petition Attachment 6, Schedule 2 Page 1 of 1 Billing Month Mwh Sales Sep-ll Oct-ll Nov-11 Dec-11 Sept - Dec 2011 Total Retail Sales Non-Demand Demand Demand Mwh Mwh Mwh kw 2,604,758 762,986 1,841,772 4,424,735 2,547,773 732,537 1,815,236 4,834,596 2,522,348 781,759 1,740,589 4,639,377 2,673,063 906,982 1,766,081 4,222,338 10,347,942 3,184,264 7,163,677 18,121,047 Total Retail Sales Non-Demand Demand Demand Mwh Mxvh Mwh kw Jan-12 2,715,813 942,814 1,772,999 4,093,834 Feb-12 2,478,938 802,989 1,675,950 4,183,756 Ma>12 2,605,125 807,364 1,797,760 4,521,996 Apt-12 2,368,873 682,125 1,686,748 4,240,882 May-12 2,484,822 682,766 1,802,057 4,852,918 Jun-12 2,764,100 877,768 1,886,332 5,015,926 jul-12 3,093,837 1,052,989 2,040,848 5,335,149 Aug-12 3,052,870 981,255 2,071,615 5,479,229 Sep-12 2,613,697 762,820 1,850,877 4,446,610 Oct-12 2,567,964 739,456 1,828,509 4,869,946 Nov-12 2,529,067 782,557 1,746,510 4,655,160 Dec-12 2,685,077 915,229 1,769,848 4,231,346 Annual 2012 31,960,183 10,030,130 21,930,053 55,926,752 Total Retail Sales Non-Demand Demand Demand Mwh Mwh Mwh kw Jan-13 2,738,847 954,656 1,784,191 4,119,676 Feb-13 2,466,029 808,397 1,657,632 4,138,030 Mar-13 2,617,550 813,913 1,803,637 4,536,779 Apt-13 2,391,298 690,023 1,701,275 4,277,405 May-13 2,497,691 689,900 1,807,792 4,868,363 Jun-13 2,784,768 884,908 1,899,860 5,051,901 Jttl-13 3,111,268 1,059,806 2,051,462 5,362,895 Aug-13 3,069,105 987,920 2,081,185 5,504,540 Sep-13 2,634,370 768,325 1,866,045 4,483,051 Oct-13 2,589,310 743,760 1,845,550 4,915,332 Nov-13 2,551,575 785,833 1,765,742 4,706,419 Dec-13 2,696,582 919,886 1,776,696 4,247,718 Annual 2013 32,148,393 10,107,327 22,041,066 56,212,107