= A + A 1. = ( A 2 A 2 ) 2 n 2. n = ( A 2 A 2 ) n 1. = ( A 2 A 2 ) n 1. We start with the skein relation for one crossing of the trefoil, which gives:

Similar documents
Generell Topologi. Richard Williamson. May 29, 2013

Generell Topologi. Richard Williamson. May 28, 2013

Temperley Lieb Algebra I

Twist Numbers of Links from the Jones Polynomial

Polynomials in knot theory. Rama Mishra. January 10, 2012

Generalized Knot Polynomials and An Application

The Satellite crossing number conjecture for cables of knots

Vassiliev Invariants, Chord Diagrams, and Jacobi Diagrams

An Introduction to Mathematical Knots

AN OVERVIEW OF KNOT INVARIANTS

CHERN-SIMONS THEORY AND LINK INVARIANTS! Dung Nguyen! U of Chicago!

Virtual Crossing Number and the Arrow Polynomial

Knot Theory and Khovanov Homology

Knot Theory and the Jones Polynomial

Surface invariants of finite type

The Three-Variable Bracket Polynomial for Reduced, Alternating Links

Surface invariants of finite type

Advancement to Candidacy. Patterns in the Coefficients of the Colored Jones Polynomial. Katie Walsh Advisor: Justin Roberts

MA3002 Generell Topologi Revision Checklist

The Enhanced Linking Number

Knots, polynomials and triangulations. Liam Hernon Supervised by Dr Norm Do and Dr Josh Howie Monash university

arxiv: v2 [math.gt] 2 Nov 2018

From Tangle Fractions to DNA

QUASI-ALTERNATING LINKS AND POLYNOMIAL INVARIANTS

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 2 Jun 2016

A brief Incursion into Knot Theory. Trinity University

ABSTRACT A STUDY OF PROJECTIONS OF 2-BOUQUET GRAPHS. A new field of mathematical research has emerged in knot theory,

Patterns and Stability in the Coefficients of the Colored Jones Polynomial. Katie Walsh Advisor: Justin Roberts

STATE MODELS AND THE JONES POLYNOMIAL

QUANTUM COMPUTATION OF THE JONES POLYNOMIAL

Tutte Polynomials with Applications

Factorizing Algebraic Expressions

6-3 Solving Systems by Elimination

1 The fundamental group Topology I

arxiv: v2 [math.gt] 10 Sep 2014

Quantum Algorithms: Problem Set 1

Knot Floer Homology and the Genera of Torus Knots

Quantum Groups and Link Invariants

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 22 Oct 2017

Knot Theory from the Combinatorial Point of View Highlights of ideas/topics/results

Classification of Four-Component Rotationally Symmetric Rose Links

Lecture 17: The Alexander Module II

ON CALCULATION OF THE WITTEN INVARIANTS OF 3-MANIFOLDS

SJÄLVSTÄNDIGA ARBETEN I MATEMATIK

The Knot Quandle. Steven Read

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 22 Jan 2019

PENGYU LIU, YUANAN DIAO AND GÁBOR HETYEI

COMPOSITE KNOT DETERMINANTS

RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RIMS The state sum invariant of 3-manifolds constructed from the E 6 linear skein.

A picture of some torus knots and links. The first several (n,2) links have dots in their center. [1]

Knots and Physics. Lifang Xia. Dec 12, 2012

A Survey of Quantum Enhancements

The state numbers of a knot

Manifestations of Symmetry in Polynomial Link Invariants

KNOT THEORY. Louis Kauffman

Why should anyone care about computing with anyons? Jiannis K. Pachos

Knots and links of disclination lines in chiral nematic colloids

BRAID GROUPS ALLEN YUAN. 1. Introduction. groups. Furthermore, the study of these braid groups is also both important to mathematics

Knots and Physics. Louis H. Kauffman

arxiv: v6 [math.gt] 3 Jun 2016

arxiv: v5 [math.gt] 4 Mar 2018

Hyperbolic Knots and the Volume Conjecture II: Khov. II: Khovanov Homology

A SKEIN APPROACH TO BENNEQUIN TYPE INEQUALITIES

KNOT CLASSIFICATION AND INVARIANCE

Figure 1 The term mutant was coined by Conway, and refers to the following general construction.

Do Super Cats Make Odd Knots?

THE UNIVERSITY of EDINBURGH

arxiv: v2 [math.gt] 24 Jul 2012

Self-Directed Course: Transitional Math Module 4: Algebra

ON THE DEGREE OF THE BRANDT-LICKORISH-MILLETT-HO POLYNOMIAL OF A LINK

Local unitary representations of the braid group and their applications to quantum computing

The algebraic crossing number and the braid index of knots and links

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 20 May 2004

ADEQUACY OF LINK FAMILIES. Slavik Jablan, Ljiljana Radović, and Radmila Sazdanović

10. Noether Normalization and Hilbert s Nullstellensatz

Knot Theory and the Alexander Polynomial

Ch6 Addition Proofs of Theorems on permutations.

Quantum Algorithms Lecture #3. Stephen Jordan

Enhanced Linking Numbers

KHOVANOV HOMOLOGY, ITS DEFINITIONS AND RAMIFICATIONS OLEG VIRO. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden POMI, St. Petersburg, Russia

KNOTS AND KNOT GROUPS

arxiv: v2 [math.gt] 15 Nov 2017

9.5 HONORS Determine Odd and Even Functions Graphically and Algebraically

Quantum Computing and the Jones Polynomial

ON CABLED KNOTS AND VASSILIEV INVARIANTS (NOT) CONTAINED IN KNOT POLYNOMIALS. A. Stoimenow

Knots and surfaces. Michael Eisermann. Universität Stuttgart 3. Juni 2014

GENERAL I ARTICLE. Knots. How To Distinguish Two Knots If You Must. v S Sunder

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 11 Aug 2008

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 8 Jun 2004

Skein invariants of links and their state sum models

Skein Invariants of Links and Their State Sum Models. Received: 19 September 2017; Accepted: 9 October 2017; Published: 13 October 2017

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 7 Nov 2017

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 23 May 2006

On links with cyclotomic Jones polynomials

CLASSICAL AND VIRTUAL PSEUDODIAGRAM THEORY AND NEW BOUNDS ON UNKNOTTING NUMBERS AND GENUS

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 20 Jan 1994

arxiv: v2 [math.gt] 26 Aug 2017

Lecture 2. The Simple Linear Regression Model: Matrix Approach

Classifying and Applying Rational Knots and Rational Tangles

Concordance of certain 3-braids and Gauss diagrams

Transcription:

Solutions to sheet 4 Solution to exercise 1: We have seen in the lecture that the Kauffman bracket is invariant under Reidemeister move 2. In particular, we have chosen the values in the skein relation accordingly (remember the knot algebra we did). With this, we can easily show the invariance of Reidemeister move 3 by: A + A 1 A + A 1 Note that in the last expression above, both diagrams can be rotated by 180 degree without changing them and hence, this shows invariance under Reidemeister move 3. Solution to exercise 2: We have the rules 1 and L ( A 2 A 2 ) L, so that Solution to exercise 3: n ( A 2 A 2 ) n 1 ( A 2 A 2 ) 2 n 2... ( A 2 A 2 ) n 1 ( A 2 A 2 ) n 1 We start with the skein relation for one crossing of the trefoil, which gives: A + A 1 Recall that the Kauffman bracket is not invariant under Reidemeister move 1. More precisely, we have to multiply the Kauffman bracket by A 3 when performing the Reidemeister move 1. Hence, the first bracket above is just ( A 3 )( A 3 ) times the bracket of the unknot, which is 1 by definition. So, we 1

have A A 7. Moreover, we have already seen in the lecture that the Kauffman bracket of the Hopf link is given by A 4 A 4, hence A 1 A 3 A 5. The Kauffman bracket of the trefoil is then A 7 A 3 A 5. Solution to exercise 4: (a) We have to show that the writhe is invariant under Reidemeister moves two (RII) and three (RIII). Let s start with RII: For any orientation of the strands we have two crossings with opposite signs before the move (i.e. that does not contribute to the writhe), and no crossing after the move. The writhe is therefore unchanged under RII. For RIII: For any orientation of the strands, the two crossings of the horizontal strand are replaced by two crossings with the same signs. The middle crossing is not affected, so the writhe is unchanged. (b) Let D be a link diagram with c crossings and denote by w the writhe of D. Let c 1 be the number of positive crossings (i.e. those which contribute +1 to the writhe) and c 2 the number of negative crossings (i.e. those which contribute 1 to the writhe). We have w c 1 c 2 and c c 1 + c 2. Combining those two equations give c w (c 1 + c 2 ) (c 1 c 2 ) 2c 2, which means that c and w are either both even or both odd. Solution to exercise 5: Let T (trefoil) and H (Hopf link) be the two diagrams. Let T be the diagram with reversed orientation and let H, H be the diagrams with one resp. two reversed components. We have: w(t ) w(t ) 3, w(h) w(h ) 2, w(h ) 2 2

From problem 3 we have the result T A 7 A 3 A 5 as well as the intermediate result H A 4 A 4 (from the lecture). We obtain the following X-polynomials X(T ) X(T ) ( A) 9 (A 7 A 3 A 5 ) A 16 + A 12 + A 4 X(H) X(H ) ( A) 6 ( A 4 A 4 ) A 2 A 10 X(H ) ( A) 6 ( A 4 A 4 ) A 10 A 2. Solution to exercise 6: Using the result of the previous problem we have V (3 1 ) X(3 1 ) At 1 4 A 16 + A 12 + A 4 At 1 4 t 4 + t 3 + t 1. Changing the orientation has no influence on V (3 1 ) by the previous problem. Solution to exercise 7: Let c be the number of crossings in a given diagram. (a) The writhe is minimal if all crossings are negative and maximal if all crossings are positive. Hence, c s c. (b) Same proof as in Exercise 4b). Solution to exercise 8: If D is an oriented knot diagram with reverse D then w(d) w(d ), since at every crossing, both directions change, i.e. every right-handed crossings stays right-handed and every left-handed crossing stays left-handed. Since the Kauffman bracket does not depend on orientations we have V (D) V (D ). Solution to exercise 9: The state sum formula is D s A s P sd 1 where P : A 2 A 2. Let s make the convention that a diagram without crossings has a single state s such that sd D and s0. (Recall that sd is the number of disjoint loops.) The above formula holds true when D is a diagram without crossings, i.e. the trivial link with n components (as seen in exercise 2). Now we can prove the formula for general diagrams by induction on the number of crossings. 3

Let D be a diagram which we resolve at the i-th crossing so that D A D + + A 1 D. By induction hypothesis we have the following equalities: A D + A A s P sd+ 1 + A s+1 P sd+ 1 + with s i a positive crossing Similar, we have A 1 D + A 1 A And hence A A s P sd 1 s P sd 1 s 1 P sd 1 with s i a negative crossing A s P sd 1 D A D + + A 1 D A s P sd 1 + A s P sd 1 with s i a positive crossing with s i a negative crossing A s P sd 1 which means that the state sum formula holds true for the diagram D. Solution to exercise 10: The Kauffman bracket of the figure-eight-knot is given by A 8 A 4 + 1 A 4 + A 8 and the writhe is zero. Substituting A t 1 4 gives the Jones polynomial V 41 (t) t 2 t 1 + 1 t + t 2 We use the skein relation t 1 V L+ (t) tv L (t) (t 1 2 t 1 2 )VL0 (t) 4

where L +, L and L 0 are chosen as L + 4 1 : L : L 0 : We know that V L 1, as it is an unknot and V L0 t 5/2 t 1/2 is the Hopf link (see exercise 11a)). Hence Solution to exercise 11: (a) We use the skein relation V (L + ) t 2 V (L ) + (t 3/2 t 1/2 )V (L 0 ) t 2 t 1 + 1 t + t 2. t 1 V L+ (t) tv L (t) (t 1 2 t 1 2 )VL0 (t) to calculate the Jones polynomial of the Hopf link L. We use L + L : L : and L 0 is the unknot. L is the unlink with two components, i.e. we have V L (t) ( t 1/2 t 1/2 ) (for any orientation of the components). So we obtain V L+ t 5/2 t 1/2 Since this polynomial is not invariant under t t 1 we deduce that the Hopf link is not equivalent to its mirror image. (b) Similarly, we can view the trefoil as L + and resolve one crossing to obtain L, which is the unknot and L 0, which is the negative Hopf link. We get: V (L + ) t 2 V (L ) + (t 3/2 t 1/2 )V (L 0 ) t + t 3 t 4. 5

Solution to exercise 12: (a) Let D 1, D 2 be oriented diagrams for K 1, K 2. Observe that every state s for D : D 1 #D 2 corresponds to a pair (s 1, s 2 ), where s i is a state for D i. We write s (s 1, s 2 ). We have s s 1 + s 2 and sd s 1 D 1 + s 2 D 2 1. We use these facts for the following computation, where P A 2 A 2 : D 1 #D 2 A s P sd 1 s A s 1+ s 2 P s1d + s2d 2 (s 1,s 2) (s 1,s 2) A s 1 P s1d 1 A s 2 P s2d 1 ( ) ( ) A s1 P s1d 1 A s2 P s2d 1 s 1 D 1 D 2. s 2 Now the fact that the writhe satisfies w(d 1 #D 2 ) w(d 1 ) + w(d 2 ) yields X(K 1 #K 2 ) ( A) 3w(K1#K2) K 1 #K 2 ( A) 3w(K1) K 1 ( A) 3w(K2) K 2 X(K 1 )X(K 2 ) and after the substitution A t 1/4 we have the desired identity. (b) The argument of part (a) needs only a slight modification in order to work here as well. Namely, for s (s 1, s 2 ) we now have sd sd 1 + sd 2. The result of the above computation then has an additional factor P A 2 A 2 t 1/2 t 1/2. Alternatively, one can apply the skein relation to a knot L for which L + L K 1 #K 2 and L 0 K 1 K 2. Solution to exercise 13: Choose an orientation for the diagram. We apply the skein relation to the crossing below the top crossing. This is a left-hand crossing, hence the given diagram is L +. One checks that L is the left-hand trefoil knot and L 0 is a negative Hopf link. Using results from previous problems we obtain V (L ) t 2 V (L + ) + (t 3/2 t 1/2 )V (L 0 ) t 2 ( t 4 + t 3 + t 1 ) + (t 3/2 t 1/2 )( t 5/2 t 1/2 ) t 6 + t 5 t 4 + 2t 3 t 2 + t 1. 6