Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 768 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871

Similar documents
Introduction to quantum information processing

Quantum Nonlocality Pt. 4: More on the CHSH Inequality

Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann

MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation

Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 768 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871

Introduction to Quantum Computing

Quantum decoherence. Éric Oliver Paquette (U. Montréal) -Traces Worshop [Ottawa]- April 29 th, Quantum decoherence p. 1/2

Quantum Computing Lecture 3. Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Anuj Dawar

Spin Dynamics Basic Theory Operators. Richard Green SBD Research Group Department of Chemistry

Quantum state discrimination with post-measurement information!

Homework 3 - Solutions

Ph 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006

Short Course in Quantum Information Lecture 2

Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 768 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871

Chapter 2 The Density Matrix

Information quantique, calcul quantique :

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

Lecture: Quantum Information

Lecture 14: Quantum information revisited

The Stern-Gerlach experiment and spin

1 Readings. 2 Unitary Operators. C/CS/Phys C191 Unitaries and Quantum Gates 9/22/09 Fall 2009 Lecture 8

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators.

b) (5 points) Give a simple quantum circuit that transforms the state

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

The tilde map can be rephased as we please; i.e.,

S.K. Saikin May 22, Lecture 13

The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1

Structure of Unital Maps and the Asymptotic Quantum Birkhoff Conjecture. Peter Shor MIT Cambridge, MA Joint work with Anand Oza and Dimiter Ostrev

Quantum Measurements: some technical background

Mathematical Methods for Quantum Information Theory. Part I: Matrix Analysis. Koenraad Audenaert (RHUL, UK)

C/CS/Phys 191 Quantum Gates and Universality 9/22/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 8. a b b d. w. Therefore, U preserves norms and angles (up to sign).

CS286.2 Lecture 15: Tsirelson s characterization of XOR games

The Framework of Quantum Mechanics

Richard Cleve David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science Institute for Quantum Computing University of Waterloo

In a D-dimensional Hilbert space, a symmetric informationally complete POVM is a

The Bloch Sphere. Ian Glendinning. February 16, QIA Meeting, TechGate 1 Ian Glendinning / February 16, 2005

Lecture 4: Postulates of quantum mechanics

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 6 Solutions 3/23/05

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

CS/Ph120 Homework 1 Solutions

Ensembles and incomplete information

1 More on the Bloch Sphere (10 points)

Quantum Computation. Alessandra Di Pierro Computational models (Circuits, QTM) Algorithms (QFT, Quantum search)

2. Introduction to quantum mechanics

Non-Completely Positive Maps: Properties and Applications

The query register and working memory together form the accessible memory, denoted H A. Thus the state of the algorithm is described by a vector

Topics in Quantum Foundations: Ontological Models, and Distinguishability as a Resource

PHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix

4. Two-level systems. 4.1 Generalities

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 17 Aug 2017

Graduate Quantum Mechanics I: Prelims and Solutions (Fall 2015)

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 3

Geometry of a qubit. Maris Ozols (ID ) December 22, 2007

Lecture 2: Linear operators

1. Basic rules of quantum mechanics

forms Christopher Engström November 14, 2014 MAA704: Matrix factorization and canonical forms Matrix properties Matrix factorization Canonical forms

Quantum Entanglement and Error Correction

Any pure quantum state ψ (qubit) of this system can be written, up to a phase, as a superposition (linear combination of the states)

Qudit Entanglement. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA. The University of Queensland, QLD 4072 Australia.

Chapter 5. Density matrix formalism

Introduction to quantum information processing

EXERCISES ON DETERMINANTS, EIGENVALUES AND EIGENVECTORS. 1. Determinants

AQI: Advanced Quantum Information Lecture 6 (Module 2): Distinguishing Quantum States January 28, 2013

. The following is a 3 3 orthogonal matrix: 2/3 1/3 2/3 2/3 2/3 1/3 1/3 2/3 2/3

Schur s Triangularization Theorem. Math 422

Quantum Information & Quantum Computing

1 Recall what is Spin

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

Unitary Transformations in 3-D Vector Representation of Qutrit States

The Convex Hull of Spin Coherent States

CS286.2 Lecture 13: Quantum de Finetti Theorems

Qubits vs. bits: a naive account A bit: admits two values 0 and 1, admits arbitrary transformations. is freely readable,

j=1 u 1jv 1j. 1/ 2 Lemma 1. An orthogonal set of vectors must be linearly independent.

Lecture 4: Purifications and fidelity

Introduction to Quantum Computing

Moore-Penrose Conditions & SVD

conventions and notation

Lecture 20: Bell inequalities and nonlocality

Geometry of the Special Unitary Group

Ph 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 3 November 2006

On the Relation between Quantum Discord and Purified Entanglement

1 Linear Algebra Problems

Computational Algebraic Topology Topic B Lecture III: Quantum Realizability

CS257 Discrete Quantum Computation

Quantum Information Types

Algebraic Theory of Entanglement

Single-Particle Interference Can Witness Bipartite Entanglement

Probabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling. Abstract

Valerio Cappellini. References

An Introduction to Quantum Computation and Quantum Information

Lecture notes on Quantum Computing. Chapter 1 Mathematical Background

Lecture If two operators A, B commute then they have same set of eigenkets.

Semiconductors: Applications in spintronics and quantum computation. Tatiana G. Rappoport Advanced Summer School Cinvestav 2005

Lecture 10: Eigenvectors and eigenvalues (Numerical Recipes, Chapter 11)

I. Multiple Choice Questions (Answer any eight)

Unitary rotations. October 28, 2014

Entanglement in bipartite and tripartite quantum systems

Quantum Noise. Michael A. Nielsen. University of Queensland

QUANTUM MECHANICS. Lecture 5. Stéphane ATTAL

Qutrit Entanglement. Abstract

Transcription:

Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 768 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871 Lecture 9 (2017) Jon Yard QNC 3126 jyard@uwaterloo.ca http://math.uwaterloo.ca/~jyard/qic710 1

More state distinguishing problems 2

More state distinguishing problems Which of these states are distinguishable? Divide them into equivalence classes: 1. 0 + 1 2. 0 1 3. 0 with prob. ½ 1 with prob. ½ 4. 0 + 1 with prob. ½ 0 1 with prob. ½ 5. 0 with prob. ½ 0 + 1 with prob. ½ 6. 0 with prob. ¼ 1 with prob. ¼ 0 + 1 with prob. ¼ 0 1 with prob. ¼ 7. The first qubit of 01 10 This is a probabilistic mixed state Answers later on... 3

Density matrix formalism 4

Density matrices (1) Until now, we ve represented quantum states as vectors (e.g. ψ, and all such states are called pure states). An alternative way of representing quantum states is in terms of density matrices (a.k.a. density operators). The density matrix of a pure state ψ is the matrix ρ = ψ ψ Example: the density matrix of α0 + β1 is ρ = α β α β = α 2 αβ α β β 2 5

Density matrices (2) How do quantum operations work using density matrices? Effect of a unitary operation on a density matrix Applying U to ρ yields UρU. This is because the modified state is U ψ ψ U. Effect of a measurement on a density matrix Measuring state ρ with respect to the basis φ 1, φ 2,, φ d yields the kth outcome with probability φ k ρ φ k. This is because φ k ρ φ k = φ k ψ ψ φ k = φ k ψ 2. After the measurement, the state collapses to φ k φ k. 6

Density matrices (3) A probability distribution on pure states is called a mixed state: (( ψ 1, p 1 ), ( ψ 2, p 2 ), ( ψ m, p m )) The density matrix associated with such a mixed state is m ρ = k=1 p k ψ k ψ k Example: the density matrix for ((0, 1/2 ), (1, 1/2 )) is ρ = 1 2 1 0 0 0 + 1 2 0 0 0 1 = 1/2 0 0 1/2. Question: what is the density matrix of ((0 + 1, 1/2 ), (0 1, 1/2 ))? 7

Density matrices (4) How do quantum operations work for these mixed states? Effect of a unitary operation on a density matrix: applying U to ρ still gives UρU. This is because the modified state is m k=1 p k U ψ k ψ k U = U m k=1 p k ψ k ψ k U = UρU. Effect of a measurement on a density matrix: measuring state ρ with respect to the basis φ 1, φ 2,, φ d, still yields the k th outcome with probability φ k ρ φ k. Why? 8

Recap: density matrices Quantum operations in terms of density matrices: Applying U to ρ gives UρU Measuring state ρ with respect to the basis φ 1, φ 2,, φ d yields: k th outcome with probability φ k ρ φ k and causes the state to collapse to φ k φ k. Since these are expressible in terms of density matrices alone (independent of any specific probabilistic mixtures), states with identical density matrices are operationally indistinguishable 9

Return to state distinguishing problems 10

State distinguishing problems (1) The density matrix of the mixed state (( ψ 1, p 1 ), ( ψ 2, p 2 ), ( ψ d, p m )) is ρ = p k ψ k ψ k Examples (from earlier in lecture): 1. & 2. 0 + 1 and 0 1 both have 3. 0 with prob. ½ 1 with prob. ½ 4. 0 + 1 with prob. ½ 0 1 with prob. ½ 6. 0 with prob. ¼ 1 with prob. ¼ 0 + 1 with prob. ¼ 0 1 with prob. ¼ ρ = 1 2 m k=1 ρ = 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 11

State distinguishing problems (2) Examples (continued): 5. 0 with prob. ½ 0 + 1 with prob. ½ has ρ = 1 2 1 0 0 0 + 1 2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 = 3/4 1/4 1/4 1/4 7. The first qubit of 01 10...? (later) 12

Characterizing density matrices Three properties of ρ: ρ = p k ψ k ψ k Trρ = 1 (TrM = M 11 + M 22 + + M dd ) k=1 ρ = ρ (i.e. ρ is Hermitian) φ ρ φ 0, for all states φ (i.e. ρ is positive semidefinite) Moreover, for any matrix ρ satisfying the above properties, there exists a probabilistic mixture whose density matrix is ρ m How do we show this? 13

Taxonomy of various normal matrices 14

Normal matrices Definition: A matrix M is normal if M M = MM Theorem: M is normal iff there exists a unitary U such that M = U DU, where D is diagonal (i.e. unitarily diagonalizable) D λ 0 0 1 0 λ 2 0 0 0 λ d Examples of abnormal matrices: 1 1 is not even 1 1 is diagonalizable, 0 1 diagonalizable 0 2 but not unitarily eigenvectors: 15

Unitary and Hermitian matrices Normal: M λ1 0 0 with respect to some 0 λ2 0 orthonormal basis 0 0 λ d Unitary: M M = I, which implies λ 2 k = 1, for all k. Hermitian: M = M which implies λ k R for all k. Question: Which matrices are both unitary and Hermitian? Answer: Reflections (λ k +1, 1 for all k). 16

Positive semidefinite Positive semidefinite: Hermitian and λ k 0 for all k. Theorem: M is positive semidefinite iff M is Hermitian and, for all φ, φ M φ 0. (Positive definite: λ k > 0 for all k) 17

Projections and density matrices Projector: Hermitian and M 2 = M, which implies that M is positive semidefinite and λ k {0,1}, for all k. Density matrix: positive semidefinite and Tr M = 1, so 1 d k 1 λ k Question: which matrices are both projections and density matrices? Answer: rank-1 projections (λ k = 1 if k = j, otherwise λ k = 0) 18

Taxonomy of normal matrices normal unitary Hermitian Reflection* *through hyperplane positive semidefinite projection density matrix rank one projection 19

Bloch sphere for qubits 20

Bloch sphere for qubits (1) Consider the set of all 2 2 density matrices They have a nice representation in terms of the Pauli matrices σ x = X = 0 1 1 0, σ y = Y = 0 i i 0, σ z = Z = 1 0 0 1. Note that these matrices, combined with I, form a basis for the vector space of all 2 2 matrices. We will express density matrices ρ in this basis. Note: Coefficient of I must be 1, since X, Y and Z are traceless. 2 21

Bloch sphere for qubits (2) We can express ρ = 1 2 (I + r xx + r y Y + r z Z). First consider the case of pure states ψ ψ, where, without loss of generality, ψ = cos θ/2 0 + e iφ sin θ/2 1 for 0 θ π, 0 φ < 2π (unique if θ 0, π). ρ = cos 2 (θ/2) e iφ cos θ/2 sin(θ/2) e iφ cos θ/2 sin(θ/2) sin 2 (θ/2) = 1 2 1 + cos θ e iφ sin(θ) e iφ sin(θ) 1 cos(θ) Therefore r = (sin θ cos φ, sin(θ)sin φ, cos(θ)) These are polar coordinates of a unit vector r R 3 22

Bloch sphere for qubits (3) 0 z y i + i + x + = 0 + 1 = 0 1 i = 0 + i1 i = 0 i1 1 Note that orthogonal corresponds to antipodal here. Pure states are on the surface ( r = 1), and mixed states are inside ( r < 1, being weighted averages of pure states). The maximally mixed state ρ = 1 2 I has r = 0. 23