Variations in Tremor Activity and Implications for Lower Crustal Deformation Along the Central San Andreas Fault

Similar documents
Slow Slip and Tremor Along San Andreas fault system

Locating nonvolcanic tremors beneath the San Andreas Fault using a station pair double difference location method

MIGRATING SWARMS OF BRITTLE-FAILURE EARTHQUAKES IN THE LOWER CRUST BENEATH MAMMOTH MOUNTAIN, CALIFORNIA

High frequency identification of non volcanic tremor triggered by regional earthquakes

Array-analysis of Tremors in Shikoku Triggered by the 2012 Sumatra Earthquake

Depth-dependent slip regime on the plate interface revealed from slow earthquake activities in the Nankai subduction zone

Tidal triggering of low frequency earthquakes near Parkfield, California: Implications for fault mechanics within the brittle-ductile transition

Article in Proof. 2. Data and Method LXXXXX

The San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth: Recent Site Characterization Studies and the 2.2-Km-Deep Pilot Hole

Regional deformation and kinematics from GPS data

Estimating the rupture extent of low frequency. earthquakes near Parkfield, CA

The Non-volcanic tremor observation in Northern Cascadia. Hsieh Hsin Sung 3/22

Slip acceleration generates seismic tremor like signals in friction experiments

Time Dependence of Postseismic Creep Following Two Strike-Slip Earthquakes. Gerasimos Michalitsianos

The Earthquake Cycle Chapter :: n/a

Earthquake Stress Drops in Southern California

Short Note Temporal Variations in Crustal Scattering Structure near Parkfield, California, Using Receiver Functions

Evidence for postseismic deformation of the lower crust following the 2004 Mw6.0 Parkfield earthquake

Velocity contrast along the Calaveras fault from analysis of fault zone head waves generated by repeating earthquakes

Lecture 20: Slow Slip Events and Stress Transfer. GEOS 655 Tectonic Geodesy Jeff Freymueller

Central Coast Seismicity Locations. Jeanne Hardebeck US Geological Survey Menlo Park, CA

Volcano Seismicity and Tremor. Geodetic + Seismic

Tremor patches in Cascadia revealed by seismic array analysis

of other regional earthquakes (e.g. Zoback and Zoback, 1980). I also want to find out

Focused Observation of the San Andreas/Calaveras Fault intersection in the region of San Juan Bautista, California

Limitations of Earthquake Triggering Models*

Recent and on-going MT studies of the San Andreas Fault zone in Central California

Two ways to think about the dynamics of earthquake ruptures

Plate Boundary Observatory Working Group for the Central and Northern San Andreas Fault System PBO-WG-CNSA

Scaling of small repeating earthquakes explained by interaction of seismic and aseismic slip in a rate and state fault model

Effect of an outer-rise earthquake on seismic cycle of large interplate earthquakes estimated from an instability model based on friction mechanics

What allows seismic events to grow big?: Insights from fault roughness and b-value analysis in stick-slip experiments

Detection and location of non-volcanic tremor beneath the Central Range in Taiwan

Supporting Information for Break of slope in earthquake-size distribution reveals creep rate along the San Andreas fault system

Measurements in the Creeping Section of the Central San Andreas Fault

Earthquake and Volcano Deformation

Friction can increase with hold time. This happens through growth and increasing shear strength of contacts ( asperities ).

An autocorrelation method to detect low frequency earthquakes within tremor

Dynamic Triggering Semi-Volcanic Tremor in Japanese Volcanic Region by The 2016 Mw 7.0 Kumamoto Earthquake

Geodesy (InSAR, GPS, Gravity) and Big Earthquakes

Remote triggering of tremor along the San Andreas Fault in central California

Earthquake stress drop estimates: What are they telling us?

Spatio-temporal variation in slip rate on the plate boundary off Sanriku, northeastern Japan, estimated from small repeating earthquakes

Seismic and aseismic processes in elastodynamic simulations of spontaneous fault slip

Does Aftershock Duration Scale With Mainshock Size?

Unlocking the Secrets of Slow Slip in Cascadia Using Low- Frequency Earthquakes. Justin R. Sweet. A dissertation

Spatial and temporal stress drop variations in small earthquakes near Parkfield, California

Frictional Properties on the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California, Inferred from Models of Afterslip following the 2004 Earthquake

to: Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San

The Solid Earth Chapter 4 Answers to selected questions. (1) Love waves involve transverse motion, generally arrive before Rayleigh waves.

Aseismic slip and fault-normal strain along the central creeping section of the San Andreas fault

Low-velocity damaged structure of the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield from fault zone trapped waves

Elastic Rebound Theory

Modulation of Tremor Amplitudes by Tidal Stresses in Cascadia Amanda Klaus Manuscript for Master s project. Abstract

What We Know (and don t know)

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 24

Sendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March

Surface Rupture in Kinematic Ruptures Models for Hayward Fault Scenario Earthquakes

Earthquake prediction. Southwest BC: Our local dangerous fault zones

MAR110 Lecture #5 Plate Tectonics-Earthquakes

A hierarchy of tremor migration patterns induced by the interaction of brittle asperities mediated by aseismic slip transients

Seismic Imaging of Scatterer Migration Associated with the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake Using Waveform Data of Repeating Earthquakes and Active Sources

DCPP Seismic FAQ s Geosciences Department 08/04/2011 GM1) What magnitude earthquake is DCPP designed for?

Earthquakes and Seismotectonics Chapter 5

Aftershocks are well aligned with the background stress field, contradicting the hypothesis of highly heterogeneous crustal stress

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 5: 2014 South Napa earthquake GPS strain analysis student exercise

Afterslip, slow earthquakes and aftershocks: Modeling using the rate & state friction law

LETTERS. Low-frequency earthquakes in Shikoku, Japan, and their relationship to episodic tremor and slip

Separating Tectonic, Magmatic, Hydrological, and Landslide Signals in GPS Measurements near Lake Tahoe, Nevada-California

Megathrust Earthquakes

Predicted reversal and recovery of surface creep on the Hayward fault following the 1906 San Francisco earthquake

Transition from stick-slip to stable sliding: the crucial effect of asperities

Internal Layers of the Earth

Overview of Seismic Source Characterization for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant

Non-volcanic Tremor: A Window into the Roots of Fault Zones

Seismological Study of Earthquake Swarms in South-Eastern Puerto Rico

Characterization of Induced Seismicity in a Petroleum Reservoir: A Case Study

Physics and Chemistry of the Earth and Terrestrial Planets

EARTHSCOPE INSTITUTE: THE SPECTRUM OF FAULT SLIP BEHAVIORS

Overview of the Seismic Source Characterization for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station

Rheology III. Ideal materials Laboratory tests Power-law creep The strength of the lithosphere The role of micromechanical defects in power-law creep

3.3. Waveform Cross-Correlation, Earthquake Locations and HYPODD

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Nonvolcanic deep tremor associated with subduction in Southwest Japan. Kazushige Obara (NIED)

M 7.0 earthquake recurrence on the San Andreas fault from a stress renewal model

EQ Monitoring and Hazards NOTES.notebook. January 07, P-wave. S-wave. surface waves. distance

Creepmeter mini-proposal John Langbein, Evelyn Roeloffs, Mick Gladwin, Ross Gwyther

Complex nonvolcanic tremor near Parkfield, California, triggered by the great 2004 Sumatra earthquake

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Modeling Approaches That Reproduce a Range of Fault Slip Behaviors: What We Have and What We Need Nadia Lapusta. California Institute of Technology

Geophysical Journal International

Magnitude-Area Scaling of Strike-Slip Earthquakes. Paul Somerville, URS

Regional tectonic stress near the San Andreas fault in central and southern California

Peter Shearer 1, Robin Matoza 1, Cecily Wolfe 2, Guoqing Lin 3, & Paul Okubo 4

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 114, B07405, doi: /2008jb005748, 2009

Crustal Deformation Earth - Chapter Pearson Education, Inc.

Earthquakes. Earthquake Magnitudes 10/1/2013. Environmental Geology Chapter 8 Earthquakes and Related Phenomena

A Closer Look At Body Wave Magnitude & Introduction To Moment Magnitude

A mechanical model of the San Andreas fault and SAFOD Pilot Hole stress measurements

Transcription:

Variations in Tremor Activity and Implications for Lower Crustal Deformation Along the Central San Andreas Fault David R. Shelly USGS, Menlo Park Shelly and Hardebeck, GRL, 2010 Collaborators: Jeanne Hardebeck Zhigang Peng Gary Fuis Jessica Murray-Moraleda Bill Ellsworth Roland Bürgmann Bob Nadeau Greg Beroza

Tremor Under the San Andreas Nadeau and Dolenc, Science, 2005

1. Tremor Locations and Migration 2 simple tecniques: 1) Cross-correlation (multiplication) 2) Stacking (addition)

Template Waveforms 10 minutes 25 seconds

Scan template through continuous data, sum correlations Shelly et al., Nature, 2007

Stacked LFE Templates Single LFE template 100 LFE stack template stacking 6

Stacked Waveforms/Picks 8 Shelly and Hardebeck, GRL, 2010

Grid Search Location (3D) Shelly and Hardebeck, GRL, 2010 9

Parkfield Tremor Locations 88 stacked LFE templates Located by P and S arrivals on stacked waveforms, using a 3D velocity model. Sources extend 75 km both NE and SW of Parkfield Shelly and Hardebeck, GRL, 2010 10

Tremor Migration Shelly, Nature, 2010 12

What does it mean? (1) Conclusion 1.1: The San Andreas fault does not end at the base of the seismogenic zone. Tremor sources are located on the deep extension of the fault, in the lower crust. Migration suggests the fault exists as a through-going structure at this depth. Conclusion 1.2: At least some portions of the deep fault deform brittlely. Tremor contains seismic waves of 30+ Hz even with temperatures ~500-600C

Parkfield Tremor Catalog 9 years of data ~36 trillion cross-correlation measurements ~600,000 events detected since mid-2001 (3000-20,000 per family) Detectible tremor activity in some area every day Shelly and Hardebeck, GRL, 2010 14

2. Variations in recurrence patterns and amplitudes among tremor families

Event Recurrence Patterns San Simeon Parkfield EQ Shelly, Nature, 2010

Shelly, Nature, 2010 Cumulative Events

Shelly, Nature, 2010 Cumulative Events

Shallower sources have larger, less frequent bursts Cumulative events Cumulative events Cumulative events Cumulative events 1 year 1 year 1 year 1 year Shelly, in prep. 19

Amplitude potential Characterize source amplitude as peak ground velocity of 20 th largest event during 2001-2010. Avoids bias from large amplitude outliers (EQs/ noise) and large number of small amplitude events Shelly and Hardebeck, 2010 20

What does it mean? (2) Conclusion 2.1: The strength of the lower crust may vary with depth. Shallower tremor sources have larger, less frequent episodes compared to deeper sources. (But what s happening from 13-20 km depth?) Conclusion 2.2: Tremor amplitude varies coherently along strike. This implies a corresponding variation in geology (fluids???). Gap beneath Parkfield may reflect further amplitude variation.

3. Tremor response to nearby earthquakes 1) 2003 San Simeon (M 6.5) 2) 2004 Parkfield (M 6.0)

Coseismic Stresses 2003 M 6.5 San Simeon (after/before activity rates) Stress model from Johanson and Bürgmann, 2010 Nadeau and Guilhem, Science, 2009 23

Coseismic Stresses 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield (after/before activity rates) Nadeau and Guilhem, Science, 2009 24

Response to 2003 San Simeon and 2004 Parkfield Earthquakes 2003 San Simeon 2004 Parkfield 2004 Parkfield (rescaled) Shelly, in prep.

Comparison of Tremor and EQ response Shelly, in prep. 26

What does it mean? (3) Conclusion 3.1: The 2003 San Simeon earthquake produces a strong stress shadow effect for the northern tremor sources. Conclusion 3.2: Postseismic deformation following the 2004 Parkfield earthquake extends into the lower crust, probably as deep afterslip. Response is asymmetric, with a greater effect beneath creeping section NW of Parkfield.

Remaining Questions (Lots!) 1. How do you get brittle (seismic) deformation at 600ºC? (Extreme weakening of the fault???) 2. Why does the deep fault slip in lots of little tiny events rather than a single larger event? What controls the migration velocities? (Interplay between brittle and ductile deformation???) 3. What s happening in places between earthquakes and tremors (~13-20 km depth)? Does this zone slip every few months along with shallow tremor bursts?? Only in big (1857- type) earthquakes??? 4. Many more