Evolutionarily Stable Dispersal Strategies in Heterogeneous Environments

Similar documents
Evolutionary Convergence to Ideal Free Dispersal Strategies and Coexistence

The Role of Advection in a Two-Species Competition Model: A Bifurcation Approach. Isabel Averill King-Yeung Lam 1 Yuan Lou 2

Investigating advection control in parabolic PDE systems for competitive populations

Interacting population models with nonlinear diffusions in ecology

King-Yeung Lam (Adrian)

THE PRINCIPLE OF PARTIAL CONTROL IN REACTION-DIFFUSION MODELS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF DISPERSAL. Lee Altenberg

A REMARK ON THE GLOBAL DYNAMICS OF COMPETITIVE SYSTEMS ON ORDERED BANACH SPACES

Does movement toward better environments always benefit a population?

COMPETITION OF FAST AND SLOW MOVERS FOR RENEWABLE AND DIFFUSIVE RESOURCE

A PDE MODEL OF INTRAGUILD PREDATION WITH CROSS-DIFFUSION. Robert Stephen Cantrell

EVOLUTION OF NATAL DISPERSAL IN SPATIALLY HETEROGENOUS ENVIRONMENTS

ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF THE PRINCIPAL EIGENVALUE FOR COOPERATIVE ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS

Spreading-vanishing dichotomy in a diffusive epidemic model with Stefan condition

Mathematical analysis of tumour invasion model with proliferation and re-establishment

Two-Species Migration and Clustering in Two-Dimensional Domains

A Semilinear Equation with Large Advection in Population Dynamics

EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE AND CONVERGENT STABLE STRATEGIES IN REACTION-DIFFUSION MODELS FOR CONDITIONAL DISPERSAL

Module BIO- M1- S06 Evolu-onary ecology. Adaptive dynamics. David Claessen Ins-tut de Biologie de l ENS Equipe Eco- Evolu-on Mathéma-que

GLOBAL ATTRACTIVITY IN A CLASS OF NONMONOTONE REACTION-DIFFUSION EQUATIONS WITH TIME DELAY

Analysis of a Chemotaxis Model for Multi-Species Host-Parasitoid Interactions

Population Modeling for Resource Allocation and Antimicrobial Stewardship

NON-CONSTANT POSITIVE STEADY STATES FOR A STRONGLY COUPLED NONLINEAR REACTION-DIFFUSION SYSTEM ARISING IN POPULATION DYNAMICS

Traveling Waves and Steady States of S-K-T Competition Model

An analogue of Rionero s functional for reaction-diffusion equations and an application thereof

DYNAMICS IN 3-SPECIES PREDATOR-PREY MODELS WITH TIME DELAYS. Wei Feng

The ideal free distribution: A review and synthesis of the game-theoretic perspective

Adaptive evolution : a population approach Benoît Perthame

Adaptive dynamics in an individual-based, multi-resource chemostat model

UPPER AND LOWER SOLUTIONS FOR A HOMOGENEOUS DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH NONLINEAR DIFFUSION AND THE PRINCIPLE OF LINEARIZED STABILITY

Mathematical analysis of tumour invasion with proliferation model and simulations

On Evolutionary Stability in Predator-Prey Models with Fast Behavioral Dynamics

Natal versus breeding dispersal: Evolution in a model system

Loops and Branches of Coexistence States in a Lotka-Volterra Competition Model

Coupled second order singular perturbations for phase transitions

Evolutionary game theory: ESS, convergence stability, and NIS

EVOLUTIONARY STABILITY OF IDEAL FREE DISPERSAL STRATEGIES: A NONLOCAL DISPERSAL MODEL

Regularity of Weak Solution to Parabolic Fractional p-laplacian

Non-Turing patterns in models with Turing-type instability

SINGULARITY THEORY OF STRATEGY FUNCTIONS UNDER DIMORPHISM EQUIVALENCE

The Ideal Free Distribution: from hypotheses to tests

Principal eigenvalue for an elliptic problem with indefinite weight on cylindrical domains

Computational Evolutionary Game Theory and why I m never using PowerPoint for another presentation involving maths ever again

Long-term adaptive diversity in Levene-type models

EVOLUTIONARY GAMES AND LOCAL DYNAMICS

Game Theory -- Lecture 4. Patrick Loiseau EURECOM Fall 2016

Resolvent Positive Linear Operators Exhibit the Reduction Phenomenon

Chemotaxis-induced spatio-temporal heterogeneity in multi-species host-parasitoid systems

OPTIMALITY AND STABILITY OF SYMMETRIC EVOLUTIONARY GAMES WITH APPLICATIONS IN GENETIC SELECTION. (Communicated by Yang Kuang)

Fitness Dependent Dispersal in Intraguild Predation Communities

Global Properties for Virus Dynamics Model with Beddington-DeAngelis Functional Response

Physics: spring-mass system, planet motion, pendulum. Biology: ecology problem, neural conduction, epidemics

Adaptive evolution : A population point of view Benoît Perthame

VITA EDUCATION. Arizona State University, , Ph.D. Huazhong Univ. of Sci. and Tech., , M.S. Lanzhou University, , B.S.

Bifurcation Diagrams of Population Models with Nonlinear Diffusion

ON THE INTERPLAY OF PREDATOR SWITCHING AND PREY EVASION IN DETERMINING THE STABILITY OF PREDATOR PREY DYNAMICS

NONSTANDARD NUMERICAL METHODS FOR A CLASS OF PREDATOR-PREY MODELS WITH PREDATOR INTERFERENCE

Shape of a Travelling Wave in a Time-Discrete Reaction-Diffusion Equation

Chapter 7: Bounded Operators in Hilbert Spaces

ON THE EXISTENCE OF THREE SOLUTIONS FOR QUASILINEAR ELLIPTIC PROBLEM. Paweł Goncerz

SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH GENERALIZED CUBIC NONLINEARITIES. Junping Shi. and Ratnasingham Shivaji

Determination of thin elastic inclusions from boundary measurements.

Topics in evolutionary dynamics Lecture 2: Phenotypic models

Evolutionary Games and Periodic Fitness

Breakdown of Pattern Formation in Activator-Inhibitor Systems and Unfolding of a Singular Equilibrium

Complexity in social dynamics : from the. micro to the macro. Lecture 4. Franco Bagnoli. Lecture 4. Namur 7-18/4/2008

EVOLUTIONARY GAMES WITH GROUP SELECTION

A PDE approach to studying evolutionary and spatial dynamics in cancer cell populations

Complex Population Dynamics in Heterogeneous Environments: Effects of Random and Directed Animal Movements

Evolution of motivations and behavioral responses! Integrating the proximate and ultimate causes of behavior!

A Stochastic Viral Infection Model with General Functional Response

A converse to the Ambrosetti-Prodi theorem

Kalle Parvinen. Department of Mathematics FIN University of Turku, Finland

Starvation driven diffusion as a survival strategy of biological organisms

Evolutionary Games in Space

A Model of Evolutionary Dynamics with Quasiperiodic Forcing

Symmetric competition as a general. model for single-species adaptive. dynamics

Other Equilibrium Notions

Uniqueness of limit cycles of the predator prey system with Beddington DeAngelis functional response

LORENTZ ESTIMATES FOR ASYMPTOTICALLY REGULAR FULLY NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS

Boundary-value Problems in Rectangular Coordinates

Biological Applications of Game Theory

Calculating the coevolved dispersal distances

A Game-Theoretic Model for Punctuated Equilibrium: Species Invasion and Stasis through Coevolution

Antagonistic and Synergistic Interactions Among Predators

A Stability Analysis on Models of Cooperative and Competitive Species

A mechanistic model for seed dispersal

Investigating seed dispersal and natural. moment methods

Mathematical Biology. Spreading speed and linear determinacy for two-species competition models. Mark A. Lewis Bingtuan Li Hans F.

Ordinary Differential Equations

arxiv: v2 [math.pr] 20 Sep 2014

Determining selection across heterogeneous landscapes: a perturbation-based method and its application to modeling evolution in space

Pattern formation in three species food web model in spatiotemporal domain with Beddington DeAngelis functional response

Brownian Motion and the Dirichlet Problem

First order differential equations

Evolutionarily Stable Strategies and Dynamics Tutorial, Example, and Open Problems

SMR/ Summer College on Plasma Physics. 30 July - 24 August, Introduction to Magnetic Island Theory.

Homogenization and Multiscale Modeling

Spatiotemporal pattern formation in a prey-predator model under environmental driving forces

Non-Constant Stable Solutions to Reaction- Diffusion Equations in Star-Shaped Domains

Gains in evolutionary dynamics. Dai ZUSAI

Transcription:

Evolutionarily Stable Dispersal Strategies in Heterogeneous Environments Yuan Lou Department of Mathematics Mathematical Biosciences Institute Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210, USA Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 1 / 43

Talk Outline 1 Unbiased dispersal 2 Balanced dispersal 3 Biased dispersal 4 Fitness-dependent dispersal Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 2 / 43

Evolution of Dispersal Unbiased dispersal How should organisms move optimally" in heterogeneous environments? Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 3 / 43

Previous works Unbiased dispersal Levin 76; Hastings 83; Holt 85; McPeek and Holt 92; Holt and McPeek 1996; Dockery et al. 1998; Kirkland et al. 2006; Abrams 2007; Armsworth and Roughgarden 2008; Amarasekare 2010 Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 4 / 43

Previous works Unbiased dispersal Levin 76; Hastings 83; Holt 85; McPeek and Holt 92; Holt and McPeek 1996; Dockery et al. 1998; Kirkland et al. 2006; Abrams 2007; Armsworth and Roughgarden 2008; Amarasekare 2010 Surveys: Johnson and Gaines 1990; Clobert et al. 2001; Levin, Muller-Landau, Nathan and Chave 2003; Bowler and Benton 2005; Holyoak et al. 2005; Amarasekare 2008 Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 4 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Evolution game theory Game theory: John von Neumann (28), John Nash (50) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 5 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Evolution game theory Game theory: John von Neumann (28), John Nash (50) Evolutionary game theory: John Maynard Smith and Price (73) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 5 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Evolution game theory Game theory: John von Neumann (28), John Nash (50) Evolutionary game theory: John Maynard Smith and Price (73) Evolutionary stable strategy (ESS): A strategy such that, if all the members of a population adopt it, no mutant strategy can invade Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 5 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Evolution game theory Game theory: John von Neumann (28), John Nash (50) Evolutionary game theory: John Maynard Smith and Price (73) Evolutionary stable strategy (ESS): A strategy such that, if all the members of a population adopt it, no mutant strategy can invade Optimal" movement strategy: Dispersal strategies that are evolutionarily stable Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 5 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Unbiased dispersal Hastings (TPB, 83); Dockery et al. (JMB, 98) u t = u[m(x) u v] in Ω (0, ), v t = v[m(x) u v] in Ω (0, ), (1) u(x, t), v(x, t): densities at x Ω R N Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 6 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Unbiased dispersal Hastings (TPB, 83); Dockery et al. (JMB, 98) u t = u[m(x) u v] in Ω (0, ), v t = v[m(x) u v] in Ω (0, ), (1) u(x, t), v(x, t): densities at x Ω R N m(x): intrinsic growth rate of species Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 6 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Unbiased dispersal Hastings (TPB, 83); Dockery et al. (JMB, 98) u t = d 1 u + u[m(x) u v] in Ω (0, ), v t = d 2 v + v[m(x) u v] in Ω (0, ), (1) u(x, t), v(x, t): densities at x Ω R N m(x): intrinsic growth rate of species d 1, d 2 : dispersal rates (strategies) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 6 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Unbiased dispersal Hastings (TPB, 83); Dockery et al. (JMB, 98) u t = d 1 u + u[m(x) u v] v t = d 2 v + v[m(x) u v] in Ω (0, ), in Ω (0, ), (1) u n = v n = 0 on Ω (0, ). u(x, t), v(x, t): densities at x Ω R N m(x): intrinsic growth rate of species d 1, d 2 : dispersal rates (strategies) No-flux boundary condition Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 6 / 43

Hasting s approach Unbiased dispersal Suppose that u (resident species) is at equilibrium: d 1 u + u [m(x) u ] = 0 in Ω, u n = 0 on Ω. (2) Question. Can mutant v grow when it is rare? Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 7 / 43

Hasting s approach Unbiased dispersal Suppose that u (resident species) is at equilibrium: d 1 u + u [m(x) u ] = 0 in Ω, u n = 0 on Ω. (2) Question. Can mutant v grow when it is rare? Stability of (u, v) = (u, 0): Let Λ(d 1, d 2 ) denote the smallest eigenvalue of d 2 ϕ + (m u )ϕ + λϕ = 0 in Ω, ϕ n = 0 on Ω. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 7 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Evolution of slow dispersal Theorem (Hastings 1983) Suppose that m(x) is non-constant, positive and continuous in Ω. If d 1 < d 2, then (u, 0) is stable; if d 1 > d 2, (u, 0) is unstable. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 8 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Evolution of slow dispersal Theorem (Hastings 1983) Suppose that m(x) is non-constant, positive and continuous in Ω. If d 1 < d 2, then (u, 0) is stable; if d 1 > d 2, (u, 0) is unstable. Λ(d 1, d 1 ) = 0 Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 8 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Evolution of slow dispersal Theorem (Hastings 1983) Suppose that m(x) is non-constant, positive and continuous in Ω. If d 1 < d 2, then (u, 0) is stable; if d 1 > d 2, (u, 0) is unstable. Λ(d 1, d 1 ) = 0 Λ(d 1, d 2 ) is increasing in d 2 Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 8 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Evolution of slow dispersal Theorem (Hastings 1983) Suppose that m(x) is non-constant, positive and continuous in Ω. If d 1 < d 2, then (u, 0) is stable; if d 1 > d 2, (u, 0) is unstable. Λ(d 1, d 1 ) = 0 Λ(d 1, d 2 ) is increasing in d 2 No dispersal rate is evolutionarily stable: Any mutant with a smaller dispersal rate can invade! Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 8 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Ideal free distribution (IFD) Fretwell and Lucas (70) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 9 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Ideal free distribution (IFD) Fretwell and Lucas (70) How should organisms distribute in heterogeneous habitat? Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 9 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Ideal free distribution (IFD) Fretwell and Lucas (70) How should organisms distribute in heterogeneous habitat? Assumption 1: Animals are "ideal" in assessment of habitat Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 9 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Ideal free distribution (IFD) Fretwell and Lucas (70) How should organisms distribute in heterogeneous habitat? Assumption 1: Animals are "ideal" in assessment of habitat Assumption 2: Animals are capable of moving "freely" Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 9 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Ideal free distribution (IFD) Fretwell and Lucas (70) How should organisms distribute in heterogeneous habitat? Assumption 1: Animals are "ideal" in assessment of habitat Assumption 2: Animals are capable of moving "freely" Prediction: Animals aggregate proportionately to the amount of resources Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 9 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Ideal free distribution (IFD) Milinski (79) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 10 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Ideal free distribution (IFD) Milinski (79) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 10 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Unbiased dispersal Logistic model u t = d u + u [m(x) u] in Ω (0, ) u n = 0 on Ω (0, ) (3) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 11 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Unbiased dispersal Logistic model u t = d u + u [m(x) u] in Ω (0, ) u n = 0 on Ω (0, ) (3) If u(x, 0) is positive, u(x, t) u (x) as t Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 11 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Unbiased dispersal Logistic model u t = d u + u [m(x) u] in Ω (0, ) u n = 0 on Ω (0, ) (3) If u(x, 0) is positive, u(x, t) u (x) as t Does u reach an IFD at equilibrium? That is, m(x) u (x) = constant? Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 11 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Heterogeneous environment Logistic model d u + u (m(x) u ) = 0 in Ω, (4) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 12 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Heterogeneous environment Logistic model d u + u (m(x) u ) = 0 in Ω, u n = 0 on Ω (4) No ideal free distribution: m/u constant. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 12 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Heterogeneous environment Logistic model d u + u (m(x) u ) = 0 in Ω, u n = 0 on Ω (4) No ideal free distribution: m/u constant. Integrating (4) in Ω, u (m u ) = 0. Ω Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 12 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Heterogeneous environment Logistic model d u + u (m(x) u ) = 0 in Ω, u n = 0 on Ω (4) No ideal free distribution: m/u constant. Integrating (4) in Ω, u (m u ) = 0. If m/u were a constant, then m u. Ω Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 12 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Heterogeneous environment Logistic model d u + u (m(x) u ) = 0 in Ω, u n = 0 on Ω (4) No ideal free distribution: m/u constant. Integrating (4) in Ω, u (m u ) = 0. If m/u were a constant, then m u. By (4), Ω m = 0 in Ω, m n = 0 on Ω, which implies that m must be a constant. Contradiction! Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 12 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Two competing species Dockery et al. (98) u t = d 1 u + u(m u v) v t = d 2 v + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ), in Ω (0, ), (5) u n = v n = 0 on Ω (0, ). Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 13 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Two competing species Dockery et al. (98) u t = d 1 u + u(m u v) v t = d 2 v + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ), in Ω (0, ), (5) u n = v n = 0 on Ω (0, ). Theorem If d 1 < d 2, (u, 0) is globally asymptotically stable. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 13 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Two competing species Dockery et al. (98) u t = d 1 u + u(m u v) v t = d 2 v + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ), in Ω (0, ), (5) u n = v n = 0 on Ω (0, ). Theorem If d 1 < d 2, (u, 0) is globally asymptotically stable. Evolution of slow dispersal: Why? Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 13 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Why smaller dispersal rate? Logistic model (6) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 14 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Why smaller dispersal rate? Logistic model d u + u (m(x) u ) = 0 in Ω, u n = 0 on Ω. (6) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 14 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Why smaller dispersal rate? Logistic model It can be shown that d u + u (m(x) u ) = 0 in Ω, u n = 0 on Ω. (6) m(x) lim d 0 u (x) = 1. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 14 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Why smaller dispersal rate? Logistic model It can be shown that d u + u (m(x) u ) = 0 in Ω, u n = 0 on Ω. (6) m(x) lim d 0 u (x) = 1. The smaller d is, the closer m/u to constant; i.e., the distribution of the species is closer to IFD for smaller dispersal rate Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 14 / 43

Unbiased dispersal Q: Are there dispersal strategies that can produce ideal free distribution? Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 15 / 43

Single species Balanced dispersal Cantrell, Cosner, L (MBE, 10) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 16 / 43

Single species Balanced dispersal Cantrell, Cosner, L (MBE, 10) u t = d 1 [ u u P(x)] + u[m(x) u] in Ω (0, ) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 16 / 43

Single species Balanced dispersal Cantrell, Cosner, L (MBE, 10) u t = d 1 [ u u P(x)] + u[m(x) u] in Ω (0, ) [ u u P(x)] n = 0 on Ω (0, ) (7) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 16 / 43

Single species Balanced dispersal Cantrell, Cosner, L (MBE, 10) u t = d 1 [ u u P(x)] + u[m(x) u] in Ω (0, ) [ u u P(x)] n = 0 on Ω (0, ) (7) P(x) = ln m(x) can produce ideal free distribution Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 16 / 43

Balanced dispersal Balanced dispersal If P(x) = ln m(x), then u m is a positive solution of Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 17 / 43

Balanced dispersal Balanced dispersal If P(x) = ln m(x), then u m is a positive solution of d 1 [ u u P(x)] + u[m(x) u] = 0 [ u u P(x)] n = 0 on Ω in Ω (8) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 17 / 43

Balanced dispersal Balanced dispersal If P(x) = ln m(x), then u m is a positive solution of d 1 [ u u P(x)] + u[m(x) u] = 0 [ u u P(x)] n = 0 on Ω Ideal free distribution: m u in Ω (8) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 17 / 43

Balanced dispersal Balanced dispersal If P(x) = ln m(x), then u m is a positive solution of d 1 [ u u P(x)] + u[m(x) u] = 0 [ u u P(x)] n = 0 on Ω Ideal free distribution: m u in Ω (8) Balanced dispersal": McPeek and Holt 1992 u u P = m m (ln m) = 0 Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 17 / 43

Balanced dispersal Balanced dispersal If P(x) = ln m(x), then u m is a positive solution of d 1 [ u u P(x)] + u[m(x) u] = 0 [ u u P(x)] n = 0 on Ω Ideal free distribution: m u in Ω (8) Balanced dispersal": McPeek and Holt 1992 u u P = m m (ln m) = 0 Is the strategy P = ln m an ESS? Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 17 / 43

Two species model Balanced dispersal u t = d 1 [ u u P] + u(m u v) in Ω (0, ) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 18 / 43

Two species model Balanced dispersal u t = d 1 [ u u P] + u(m u v) in Ω (0, ) v t = d 2 [ v v Q] + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 18 / 43

Two species model Balanced dispersal u t = d 1 [ u u P] + u(m u v) in Ω (0, ) v t = d 2 [ v v Q] + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ) (9) [ u u P] n = [ v v Q] n = 0 on Ω (0, ) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 18 / 43

Two species model Balanced dispersal u t = d 1 [ u u P] + u(m u v) in Ω (0, ) v t = d 2 [ v v Q] + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ) (9) [ u u P] n = [ v v Q] n = 0 on Ω (0, ) If P = ln m, (m, 0) is a steady state. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 18 / 43

Two species model Balanced dispersal u t = d 1 [ u u P] + u(m u v) in Ω (0, ) v t = d 2 [ v v Q] + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ) (9) [ u u P] n = [ v v Q] n = 0 on Ω (0, ) If P = ln m, (m, 0) is a steady state. Is (m, 0) asymptotically stable? ( Is P = ln m an ESS?) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 18 / 43

Stability of (m, 0) Balanced dispersal Original system: u t = d 1 [ u u ln m] + u(m u v), v t = d 2 [ v v Q] + v(m u v). (10) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 19 / 43

Stability of (m, 0) Balanced dispersal Original system: u t = d 1 [ u u ln m] + u(m u v), v t = d 2 [ v v Q] + v(m u v). (10) Perturbation of (m(x), 0): (u, v) = (m, 0) + (ɛϕ(x)e λt, ɛψ(x)e λt ) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 19 / 43

Stability of (m, 0) Balanced dispersal Original system: u t = d 1 [ u u ln m] + u(m u v), v t = d 2 [ v v Q] + v(m u v). (10) Perturbation of (m(x), 0): (u, v) = (m, 0) + (ɛϕ(x)e λt, ɛψ(x)e λt ) Equations for (ϕ, ψ, λ): d 1 [ ϕ ϕ ln m] mϕ mψ = λϕ, d 2 [ ψ ψ Q] = λψ. (11) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 19 / 43

Stability of (m, 0) Balanced dispersal Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 20 / 43

Stability of (m, 0) Balanced dispersal Eigenvalue problem for the stability of (m, 0): d 2 [ ψ ψ Q] = λψ in Ω, [ ψ ψ Q] = 0 on Ω. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 20 / 43

Stability of (m, 0) Balanced dispersal Eigenvalue problem for the stability of (m, 0): d 2 [ ψ ψ Q] = λψ in Ω, [ ψ ψ Q] = 0 on Ω. (λ, ψ) = (0, e Q ) is a solution Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 20 / 43

Stability of (m, 0) Balanced dispersal Eigenvalue problem for the stability of (m, 0): d 2 [ ψ ψ Q] = λψ in Ω, [ ψ ψ Q] = 0 on Ω. (λ, ψ) = (0, e Q ) is a solution Bad news: Zero is the smallest eigenvalue; i.e., (m, 0) is neutrally stable Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 20 / 43

Balanced dispersal Evolutionary stable strategy Cantrell et. al (10); Averill, Munther, L (JBD, 2012) Theorem Suppose that m C 2 ( Ω), is non-constant and positive in Ω. If P = ln m and Q ln m is non-constant, then (m, 0) is globally stable. P = lnm is an ESS: It can resist the invasion of any other strategy Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 21 / 43

Balanced dispersal Evolutionary stable strategy Cantrell et. al (10); Averill, Munther, L (JBD, 2012) Theorem Suppose that m C 2 ( Ω), is non-constant and positive in Ω. If P = ln m and Q ln m is non-constant, then (m, 0) is globally stable. P = lnm is an ESS: It can resist the invasion of any other strategy It can displace any other strategy Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 21 / 43

Proof Balanced dispersal Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 22 / 43

Proof Balanced dispersal Define E(t) = Ω [u(x, t) + v(x, t) m(x) ln u(x, t)] dx. Then de/dt 0 for all t 0. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 22 / 43

Proof Balanced dispersal Define E(t) = Ω [u(x, t) + v(x, t) m(x) ln u(x, t)] dx. Then de/dt 0 for all t 0. Three or more competing species: Gejji et al. (BMB 2012); Munther and L. (DCDS-A 2012) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 22 / 43

Balanced dispersal Other dispersal strategies which can produce ideal free distribution: (Mark Lewis) ( u ) u t = d + u[m(x) u] (12) m Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 23 / 43

Balanced dispersal Other dispersal strategies which can produce ideal free distribution: (Mark Lewis) ( u ) u t = d + u[m(x) u] (12) m (Dan Ryan) [ ( u )] u t = d mf (m, m) + u[m(x) u], (13) m where f (m(x 1 ), m(x 2 )) is the probability moving from x 1 to x 2 which satisfies D 2 f (m, m) D 1 f (m, m) = f (m, m) m. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 23 / 43

Single species Balanced dispersal Cosner, Davilla and Martinez (JBD, 11) u t = k(x, y)u(y, t) dy u(x, t) k(y, x) dy + u[m(x) u] (14) Ω Ω Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 24 / 43

Single species Balanced dispersal Cosner, Davilla and Martinez (JBD, 11) u t = k(x, y)u(y, t) dy u(x, t) k(y, x) dy + u[m(x) u] (14) Ω Ω Definition: k(x, y) is an ideal free dispersal strategy if k(x, y)m(y) dy = m(x) k(y, x) dy, x Ω. (15) Ω Ω Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 24 / 43

Single species Balanced dispersal Cosner, Davilla and Martinez (JBD, 11) u t = k(x, y)u(y, t) dy u(x, t) k(y, x) dy + u[m(x) u] (14) Ω Ω Definition: k(x, y) is an ideal free dispersal strategy if k(x, y)m(y) dy = m(x) k(y, x) dy, x Ω. (15) Ω Ω Example: k(x, y) = m τ (x)m τ 1 (y). Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 24 / 43

Single species Balanced dispersal Cosner, Davilla and Martinez (JBD, 11) u t = k(x, y)u(y, t) dy u(x, t) k(y, x) dy + u[m(x) u] (14) Ω Ω Definition: k(x, y) is an ideal free dispersal strategy if k(x, y)m(y) dy = m(x) k(y, x) dy, x Ω. (15) Ω Ω Example: k(x, y) = m τ (x)m τ 1 (y). m(x) is an equilibrium of (14) k(x, y) satisfies (15). Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 24 / 43

Two species model Balanced dispersal Cantrell, Cosner, L and Ryan (Canadian Appl. Math. Quart., in press) u t = v t = Ω Ω k(x, y)u(y, t) dy u(x, t) Ω k (x, y)v(y, t) dy v(x, t) Ω k(y, x) dy + u[m(x) u v], k (y, x) dy + v[m(x) u v]. (16) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 25 / 43

Two species model Balanced dispersal Cantrell, Cosner, L and Ryan (Canadian Appl. Math. Quart., in press) u t = v t = Ω Ω k(x, y)u(y, t) dy u(x, t) Ω k (x, y)v(y, t) dy v(x, t) Ω k(y, x) dy + u[m(x) u v], k (y, x) dy + v[m(x) u v]. (16) Theorem Suppose that both k and k are continuous and positive in Ω Ω, k is an ideal free dispersal strategy and k is not an ideal dispersal strategy. Then, (m(x), 0) of (16) is globally stable in C( Ω) C( Ω) for all positive initial data. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 25 / 43

A key ingredient Balanced dispersal Let h : Ω Ω [0, ) be a continuous function. Then the following two statements are equivalent: Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 26 / 43

A key ingredient Balanced dispersal Let h : Ω Ω [0, ) be a continuous function. Then the following two statements are equivalent: i h(x, y) dy = Ω Ω h(y, x) dy for all x Ω. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 26 / 43

A key ingredient Balanced dispersal Let h : Ω Ω [0, ) be a continuous function. Then the following two statements are equivalent: i h(x, y) dy = Ω Ω h(y, x) dy for all x Ω. ii Ω Ω f (x) f (y) h(x, y) dx dy 0 for any f C(Ω), f > 0 on Ω. f (y) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 26 / 43

Summary Balanced dispersal Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 27 / 43

Summary Balanced dispersal Balanced dispersal strategies are generally evolutionarily stable Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 27 / 43

Summary Balanced dispersal Balanced dispersal strategies are generally evolutionarily stable What happens if dispersal strategies are unbalanced? Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 27 / 43

Single species Biased dispersal Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 28 / 43

Single species Biased dispersal Biased dispersal: Organisms can sense and respond to local environmental cues Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 28 / 43

Single species Biased dispersal Biased dispersal: Organisms can sense and respond to local environmental cues Belgacem and Cosner (Canadian Appl. Math Quart. 1995) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 28 / 43

Single species Biased dispersal Biased dispersal: Organisms can sense and respond to local environmental cues Belgacem and Cosner (Canadian Appl. Math Quart. 1995) u t = d 1 [ u αu m] + u(m u) in Ω (0, ), Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 28 / 43

Single species Biased dispersal Biased dispersal: Organisms can sense and respond to local environmental cues Belgacem and Cosner (Canadian Appl. Math Quart. 1995) u t = d 1 [ u αu m] + u(m u) in Ω (0, ), [ u αu m] n = 0 on Ω (0, ) (17) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 28 / 43

Biased vs unbiased Biased dispersal Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 29 / 43

Biased vs unbiased Biased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner and L. (Math. Bios., 06) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 29 / 43

Biased vs unbiased Biased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner and L. (Math. Bios., 06) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 29 / 43

Biased vs unbiased Biased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner and L. (Math. Bios., 06) u t = d 1 [ u αu m] + u(m u v) in Ω (0, ), Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 29 / 43

Biased vs unbiased Biased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner and L. (Math. Bios., 06) u t = d 1 [ u αu m] + u(m u v) in Ω (0, ), v t = d 2 v + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ), Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 29 / 43

Biased vs unbiased Biased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner and L. (Math. Bios., 06) u t = d 1 [ u αu m] + u(m u v) in Ω (0, ), v t = d 2 v + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ), [ u αu m] n = v n = 0 on Ω (0, ) (18) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 29 / 43

Weak advection Biased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner and L. (Proc. Roy Soc. Edin, 07) Theorem Suppose that m C 2 ( Ω), positive, non-constant. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 30 / 43

Weak advection Biased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner and L. (Proc. Roy Soc. Edin, 07) Theorem Suppose that m C 2 ( Ω), positive, non-constant. If d 1 = d 2, α > 0 small and Ω is convex, (u, 0) is globally stable Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 30 / 43

Weak advection Biased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner and L. (Proc. Roy Soc. Edin, 07) Theorem Suppose that m C 2 ( Ω), positive, non-constant. If d 1 = d 2, α > 0 small and Ω is convex, (u, 0) is globally stable For some non-convex Ω and m(x), (0, v ) is globally stable Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 30 / 43

Strong advection Biased dispersal Cantrell et al. (07); Chen, Hambrock, L (JMB, 08) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 31 / 43

Strong advection Biased dispersal Cantrell et al. (07); Chen, Hambrock, L (JMB, 08) Theorem Suppose that m C 2 ( Ω), positive, non-constant. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 31 / 43

Strong advection Biased dispersal Cantrell et al. (07); Chen, Hambrock, L (JMB, 08) Theorem Suppose that m C 2 ( Ω), positive, non-constant. For any d 1 and d 2, if α is large, both (u, 0) and (0, v ) are unstable, and system (18) has a stable positive steady state. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 31 / 43

Strong advection Biased dispersal Cantrell et al. (07); Chen, Hambrock, L (JMB, 08) Theorem Suppose that m C 2 ( Ω), positive, non-constant. For any d 1 and d 2, if α is large, both (u, 0) and (0, v ) are unstable, and system (18) has a stable positive steady state. Strong advection can induce coexistence of competing species Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 31 / 43

Aggregation Biased dispersal Theorem Let (u, v) be a positive steady state of system (18). As α, v(x) v and { } u(x) = e α[m(x 0) m(x)] 2 N 2 [m(x0 ) v (x 0 )] + o(1), where x 0 is a local maximum of m such that m(x 0 ) v (x 0 ) > 0. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 32 / 43

Aggregation Biased dispersal Theorem Let (u, v) be a positive steady state of system (18). As α, v(x) v and { } u(x) = e α[m(x 0) m(x)] 2 N 2 [m(x0 ) v (x 0 )] + o(1), where x 0 is a local maximum of m such that m(x 0 ) v (x 0 ) > 0. Chen and L (Indiana Univ. Math J, 08): m has a unique local maximum Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 32 / 43

Aggregation Biased dispersal Theorem Let (u, v) be a positive steady state of system (18). As α, v(x) v and { } u(x) = e α[m(x 0) m(x)] 2 N 2 [m(x0 ) v (x 0 )] + o(1), where x 0 is a local maximum of m such that m(x 0 ) v (x 0 ) > 0. Chen and L (Indiana Univ. Math J, 08): m has a unique local maximum Lam and Ni (DCDS-A, 10): m finite many local maxima, N = 1 Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 32 / 43

Aggregation Biased dispersal Theorem Let (u, v) be a positive steady state of system (18). As α, v(x) v and { } u(x) = e α[m(x 0) m(x)] 2 N 2 [m(x0 ) v (x 0 )] + o(1), where x 0 is a local maximum of m such that m(x 0 ) v (x 0 ) > 0. Chen and L (Indiana Univ. Math J, 08): m has a unique local maximum Lam and Ni (DCDS-A, 10): m finite many local maxima, N = 1 Lam (SIMA, 12): m finite many local maxima, N 1 Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 32 / 43

Biased dispersal Consider u t = d [ u αu m] + u(m u v) in Ω (0, ), v t = d [ v βv m] + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ), (19) [ u αu m] n = [ v βv m] n = 0 on Ω Question. Can we find some advection rate which is evolutionarily stable? Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 33 / 43

Biased dispersal Hasting s approach revisited Suppose that species u is at equilibrium: d [ u αu m] + u [m(x) u ] = 0 in Ω, [ u αu m] n = 0 on Ω. (20) Question. Can species v grow when it is rare? Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 34 / 43

Biased dispersal Hasting s approach revisited Suppose that species u is at equilibrium: d [ u αu m] + u [m(x) u ] = 0 in Ω, [ u αu m] n = 0 on Ω. (20) Question. Can species v grow when it is rare? Stability of (u, v) = (u, 0): Let Λ(α, β) denote the smallest eigenvalue of d [ ϕ βϕ m] + (m u )ϕ + λϕ = 0 in Ω, [ ϕ βϕ m] n = 0 on Ω. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 34 / 43

Adaptive Dynamics Biased dispersal Question: Is there an ESS? That is, there exists some α > 0 such that Λ(α, β) > 0, β α Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 35 / 43

Adaptive Dynamics Biased dispersal Question: Is there an ESS? That is, there exists some α > 0 such that Λ(α, β) > 0, β α Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 35 / 43

Adaptive Dynamics Biased dispersal Question: Is there an ESS? That is, there exists some α > 0 such that Λ(α, β) > 0, β α Step 1. Find α such that Λ β (α, α ) = 0. Such α is called evolutionarily singular strategy. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 35 / 43

Adaptive Dynamics Biased dispersal Question: Is there an ESS? That is, there exists some α > 0 such that Λ(α, β) > 0, β α Step 1. Find α such that Λ β (α, α ) = 0. Such α is called evolutionarily singular strategy. Step 2. If α is an evolutionarily singular strategy, determine the sign of 2 Λ β 2 (α, α ) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 35 / 43

K.-Y. Lam and L. (2012) Biased dispersal Theorem Suppose that m > 0, C 2 ( Ω), 1 < max Ω m min Ω m 3 + 2 2. Given any γ > 0, if d is small, there exists exactly exactly one evolutionarily singular strategy, denoted as α, in (0, γ]. As d 0, α η, where η is the unique positive root of e ηm (1 ηm)m m 2 = 0. Ω For some functions m satisfying max Ω m min Ω m > 3 + 2 2, there are at least 3 evolutionarily singular strategies. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 36 / 43

Biased dispersal Theorem Suppose that Ω is convex and ln(m) L α 0 diam(ω), where α 0 0.814, then for small d, α = α, β α and β α, (u, 0) is asymptotically stable. max Ω m min Ω m eα 0 2.257 < 3 + 2 2. For some function m satisfying max Ω m min Ω m > 3 + 2 2, there exists some evolutionarily singular strategy which is not an ESS. Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 37 / 43

Biased dispersal One ingredient of the proof is the following celebrated theorem of Payne and Weinberger: Theorem Suppose that Ω is a convex domain in R N. Let µ 2 denote the second eigenvalue of the Laplacian with Neumann boundary condition. Then ( ) π 2 µ 2. diam(ω) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 38 / 43

Single species Fitness-dependent dispersal Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 39 / 43

Single species Fitness-dependent dispersal Dispersal up the gradient of fitness: Armsworth and Roughgarden 2005, 2008; Abrams 2007; Amarasekare 2010 Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 39 / 43

Single species Fitness-dependent dispersal Dispersal up the gradient of fitness: Armsworth and Roughgarden 2005, 2008; Abrams 2007; Amarasekare 2010 Cosner (TPB 2005); Cantrell, Cosner, L. (JDE 2008); Cosner and Winkler (2013) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 39 / 43

Single species Fitness-dependent dispersal Dispersal up the gradient of fitness: Armsworth and Roughgarden 2005, 2008; Abrams 2007; Amarasekare 2010 Cosner (TPB 2005); Cantrell, Cosner, L. (JDE 2008); Cosner and Winkler (2013) u t = d [ u αu (m u)] + u(m u) in Ω (0, ), Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 39 / 43

Single species Fitness-dependent dispersal Dispersal up the gradient of fitness: Armsworth and Roughgarden 2005, 2008; Abrams 2007; Amarasekare 2010 Cosner (TPB 2005); Cantrell, Cosner, L. (JDE 2008); Cosner and Winkler (2013) u t = d [ u αu (m u)] + u(m u) in Ω (0, ), [ u αu (m u)] n = 0 on Ω (0, ) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 39 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Fitness-dependent vs unbiased dispersal Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 40 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Fitness-dependent vs unbiased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner, L. and Xie (JDE 2013); L. Tao and Winkler (2013) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 40 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Fitness-dependent vs unbiased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner, L. and Xie (JDE 2013); L. Tao and Winkler (2013) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 40 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Fitness-dependent vs unbiased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner, L. and Xie (JDE 2013); L. Tao and Winkler (2013) u t = d 1 [ u αu (m u v)] + u(m u v), Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 40 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Fitness-dependent vs unbiased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner, L. and Xie (JDE 2013); L. Tao and Winkler (2013) u t = d 1 [ u αu (m u v)] + u(m u v), v t = d 2 v + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ), Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 40 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Fitness-dependent vs unbiased dispersal Cantrell, Cosner, L. and Xie (JDE 2013); L. Tao and Winkler (2013) u t = d 1 [ u αu (m u v)] + u(m u v), v t = d 2 v + v(m u v) in Ω (0, ), [ u αu (m u v)] n = v n = 0 on Ω (0, ) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 40 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Recent developments Convergent stable strategy, evolution of two traits: Gejji et al, BMB, 2012 Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 41 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Recent developments Convergent stable strategy, evolution of two traits: Gejji et al, BMB, 2012 Directed movement in periodic environment: Kawasaki et al., BMB, 2012 Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 41 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Recent developments Convergent stable strategy, evolution of two traits: Gejji et al, BMB, 2012 Directed movement in periodic environment: Kawasaki et al., BMB, 2012 Multi-trophic level models: X.-F. Wang and Y.-P. Wu 2002; D. DeAngelis et al. Am. Nat, 2011; Wu and L, SIAP 2011 Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 41 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Recent developments Convergent stable strategy, evolution of two traits: Gejji et al, BMB, 2012 Directed movement in periodic environment: Kawasaki et al., BMB, 2012 Multi-trophic level models: X.-F. Wang and Y.-P. Wu 2002; D. DeAngelis et al. Am. Nat, 2011; Wu and L, SIAP 2011 Dispersal in random environments: Evans et al. JMB 2012; S. Schreiber, Am. Nat, in press Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 41 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Acknowledgment Collaborators: Steve Cantrell, Chris Cosner (University of Miami) Isabel Averill, Richard Hambrock Xinfu Chen (University of Pittsburgh) King-Yeung Lam (MBI) Dan Munther (York University) Dan Ryan (NIMBioS) Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 42 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal Acknowledgment Collaborators: Steve Cantrell, Chris Cosner (University of Miami) Isabel Averill, Richard Hambrock Xinfu Chen (University of Pittsburgh) King-Yeung Lam (MBI) Dan Munther (York University) Dan Ryan (NIMBioS) Support: NSF, Mathematical Biosciences Institute Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 42 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal MBI Emphasis Year on Cancer and Its Environment: 2014-15 Ecology and Evolution of Cancer Metastasis and Angiogenesis Cancer and the Immune System Tumor Heterogeneity and the Microenvironment Treatment, Clinical Trials, Resistance Targeting Cancer Cell Proliferation and Metabolism Networks Stem Cells, Development, and Cancer Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 43 / 43

Fitness-dependent dispersal MBI Emphasis Year on Cancer and Its Environment: 2014-15 Ecology and Evolution of Cancer Metastasis and Angiogenesis Cancer and the Immune System Tumor Heterogeneity and the Microenvironment Treatment, Clinical Trials, Resistance Targeting Cancer Cell Proliferation and Metabolism Networks Stem Cells, Development, and Cancer Thank you! Yuan Lou (Ohio State) NC State 2013 43 / 43