SEA ICE PREDICTION NETWORK (SIPN) Pan-Arctic Sea Ice Outlook Core Contributions June 2015 Report

Similar documents
SEA ICE OUTLOOK 2016 Report

2014 September Arctic Sea Ice Outlook

SEA ICE OUTLOOK 2016 Report

CNRM pan-arctic sea ice outlook for September 2016 sea ice extent initialized in early July Matthieu Chevallier, Constantin Ardilouze, Lauriane Batté

SEA ICE OUTLOOK 2016 Report

SEA ICE PREDICTION NETWORK (SIPN) Pan-Arctic Sea Ice Outlook Core Contributions July 2015 Report

The Northern Hemisphere Sea ice Trends: Regional Features and the Late 1990s Change. Renguang Wu

Outline: 1) Extremes were triggered by anomalous synoptic patterns 2) Cloud-Radiation-PWV positive feedback on 2007 low SIE

Current status and plans for developing sea ice forecast services and products for the WMO Arctic Regional Climate Centre Sea Ice Outlook

We greatly appreciate the thoughtful comments from the reviewers. According to the reviewer s comments, we revised the original manuscript.

Second Session of the Pan-Arctic Regional Climate Outlook Forum (PARCOF-2), virtual forum, October 2018

SEA ICE PREDICTION NETWORK (SIPN) Template for Pan-Arctic Sea Ice Outlook Core Contributions August 2015 Report

Sea ice outlook 2010

Advancements and Limitations in Understanding and Predicting Arctic Climate Change

Arctic sea ice falls below 4 million square kilometers

This is version v0.2 of this report issued together with the SIT and SIV data sets at the ICDC ESA-CCI- Projekt web page

Seasonal forecasting of climate anomalies for agriculture in Italy: the TEMPIO Project

Climate Outlook for October 2017 March 2018

Graphing Sea Ice Extent in the Arctic and Antarctic

Multi-Model Calibrated Probabilistic Seasonal Forecasts of Regional Arctic Sea Ice Coverage

On Modeling the Oceanic Heat Fluxes from the North Pacific / Atlantic into the Arctic Ocean

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING. June 22, 2018 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region

Uncertainty in Ocean Surface Winds over the Nordic Seas

Sea ice outlook 2011

Impact of Eurasian spring snow decrement on East Asian summer precipitation

on climate and its links with Arctic sea ice cover

Canadian Ice Service

Sea ice thickness. Ed Blanchard-Wrigglesworth University of Washington

Climate Prediction Center Research Interests/Needs

Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover

3.6 The Sea Ice Outlook

Sea ice outlook 2012

Observed rate of loss of Arctic ice extent is faster than IPCC AR4 predictions

Seasonal predictions of ice extent in the Arctic Ocean

The role of sea-ice in extended range prediction of atmosphere and ocean

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING. July 20, 2018 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region

A Thin Ice Cover, a Strong Summer Cyclone, and the Record Minimum Arctic Sea Ice Extent in 2012

The increase of snowfall in Northeast China after the mid 1980s

Prospects for subseasonal forecast of Tropical Cyclone statistics with the CFS

The ECMWF prototype for coupled reanalysis. Patrick Laloyaux

Sea-Ice Prediction in the GFDL model framework

June Report: Outlook Based on May Data Regional Outlook: Beaufort and Chuckchi Seas, High Arctic, and Northwest Passage

Antarctic sea ice changes natural or anthropogenic? Will Hobbs

Expansion of Climate Prediction Center Products

The Antarctic Dipole and its Predictability

Interannual Climate Prediction at IC3

A Markov Model for Seasonal Forecast of Antarctic Sea Ice *

Correction to Evaluation of the simulation of the annual cycle of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice coverages by 11 major global climate models

2013 ATLANTIC HURRICANE SEASON OUTLOOK. June RMS Cat Response

September 2016 Arctic Sea Ice Outlook June Report (Using May Data)

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING. December 22, 2017 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region

Changing predictability characteristics of Arctic sea ice in a warming climate

Seasonal Outlook for Winter 2014/15 over China

Extreme, transient Moisture Transport in the high-latitude North Atlantic sector and Impacts on Sea-ice concentration:

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING. November 17, 2017 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region

EMC Probabilistic Forecast Verification for Sub-season Scales

SEASONAL CLIMATE FORECASTING TO BENEFIT BUSINESS AND SOCIETY

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE FORECAST BRIEFING. January 23, 2015 Rick Thoman ESSD Climate Services

NSIDC Sea Ice Outlook Contribution, 31 May 2012

IAP Dynamical Seasonal Prediction System and its applications

A Markov Model for Seasonal Forecast of Antarctic Sea Ice*

Atmospheric circulation analysis for seasonal forecasting

International Arctic Buoy Programme Report

El Niño, South American Monsoon, and Atlantic Niño links as detected by a. TOPEX/Jason Observations

Influence of changes in sea ice concentration and cloud cover on recent Arctic surface temperature trends

Improving numerical sea ice predictions in the Arctic Ocean by data assimilation using satellite observations

Empirical Orthogonal Functions and the Statistical Predictability of Sea Ice Extent

Estimate for sea ice extent for September, 2009 is comparable to the 2008 minimum in sea ice extent, or ~ km 2.

Weakening relationship between East Asian winter monsoon and ENSO after mid-1970s

Winter Forecast for GPC Tokyo. Shotaro TANAKA Tokyo Climate Center (TCC) Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)

Changes in seasonal cloud cover over the Arctic seas from satellite and surface observations

Modeling the Arctic Climate System

CMIP5-based global wave climate projections including the entire Arctic Ocean

July Forecast Update for North Atlantic Hurricane Activity in 2018

An Assessment of the Navy's Sea Ice Outlook Predictions for 2014

CHAPTER 2 DATA AND METHODS. Errors using inadequate data are much less than those using no data at all. Charles Babbage, circa 1850

Arctic Ocean-Sea Ice-Climate Interactions

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE FORECAST BRIEFING. October 27, 2017 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region

Twenty-five winters of unexpected Eurasian cooling unlikely due to Arctic sea-ice loss

Antarctic Sea Ice: Mean state and variability in CCSM control run. Laura Landrum, Marika Holland, Dave Schneider, Elizabeth Hunke

August Forecast Update for Atlantic Hurricane Activity in 2016

The ECMWF Extended range forecasts

Nonlinear atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss under different sea ice scenarios

Using Arctic Ocean Color Data in ocean-sea ice-biogeochemistry seasonal forecasting systems

Climate Change and Arctic Ecosystems

Special blog on winter 2016/2017 retrospective can be found here -

Regional Outlook for the Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort Seas Contribution to the 2018 Sea Ice Outlook

Changes in Frequency of Extreme Wind Events in the Arctic

JMA s Seasonal Prediction of South Asian Climate for Summer 2018

On the Association between Spring Arctic Sea Ice Concentration and Chinese Summer Rainfall: A Further Study

The Oceanic Component of CFSR

Balanced multivariate model errors of an intermediate coupled model for ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation

CERA: The Coupled ECMWF ReAnalysis System. Coupled data assimilation

The Atmospheric Circulation

Operational sea ice forecasting and navigation service for Chinese National Antarctic Research Expedition (CHINARE)

Dmitry Dukhovskoy and Mark Bourassa

T2.2: Development of assimilation techniques for improved use of surface observations

Causes of Changes in Arctic Sea Ice

Loitering of the Retrea1ng Sea Ice Edge in the Arc1c Seas

arxiv: v5 [physics.ao-ph] 12 Sep 2018

Transcription:

SEA ICE PREDICTION NETWORK (SIPN) Pan-Arctic Sea Ice Outlook Core Contributions June 2015 Report *REQUIRED 1. *Contributor Name(s)/Group how you would like your contribution to be labeled in the report (e.g., Wiggins et al.) Yuan et al. 2. *"Executive summary" about your Outlook contribution (max 300 words) Say in a few sentences what your Outlook contribution is and why. To the extent possible, use non-technical language. The prediction is made by statistical models, which are capable to predict Arctic sea ice concentrations at grid points 4-months in advance with reasonable skills. The models employ 34 years of monthly time series of sea ice, SST and atmospheric variables. The Pan Arctic SIE calculated from predicted ice concentration in September 2015 is projected to be 4.99 million square kilometers, lower than the observed extents in 2013 and 2014, but still above the historical low in 2012. The ice concentration is significantly below the 34-year climatology in the Beaufort Sea, Chukchi Sea, East Siberian Sea, Laptev Sea, Kara Sea and Barents Sea. 3. *Type of Outlook projection dynamic model _x statistical heuristic mixed or other: (specify) If you use a model, please specify: Model Name Linear Markov Model Components of the model: Atmosphere_x_, Ocean_x_, Ice_x, Land, For models lacking an atmosphere or ocean, please describe the forcing: 4. *September monthly average projection (extent in million square kilometers. To be consistent with the validating sea ice extent index from NSIDC, if possible please first compute the average concentration for the month and then compute the extent as the sum of area of all cells > 15%.) 4.99 5. *Short explanation of Outlook method (max 300 words) In addition, we encourage you to submit a more detailed Outlook, including discussions of uncertainties/probabilities, including any relevant figures, imagery, and references. If this is a model contribution, please include method of method of initialization and variable used. A Linear Markov model is used to predict monthly Arctic sea ice concentration at all grid points in the pan Arctic region. The model is a stochastic linear inverse model that was built in the multivariate EOF space and Sea Ice Prediction Network ARCUS June 2015

is capable of capturing the co-variability in the ocean-sea ice-atmosphere system. The model employs 6 variables (ice concentration, sea surface temperature, surface air temperature, 300mb height and wind vectors at 300mb) and 11 meof modes, and September SIE is calculated from predicted monthly mean ice concentrations. In addition, we also used a regional Markov model for the Pacific sector of the Arctic, which provides better skills than the pan Arctic model in this region. The results from the pan Arctic and regional models were then merged to produce the final prediction and predictive skill assessments. 6. Projection uncertainty/probability estimate for September extent (only required if available with the method you are using) The uncertainty is measured by RMS errors (RMSE) between predicted extent and observed extent. EMSE for September sea ice extent is 0.545 million square kilometers and the correlation is 0.8. 7. Short explanation/assessment of basis for the uncertainty estimate in #6 (1-2 sentences) The uncertainty is estimated based on the cross-validation experiments for four-month lead predictions of September ice concentration and sea ice extent using 34 years (1979-2012) of time series. The data used include SIC with a NASA Team algorithm, NCEP/NCAR reanalysis atmospheric variables and ERSST. Sea Ice Prediction Network ARCUS June 2015

September 2015 Arctic Sea Ice Prediction Based on May Observations: Pan Arctic Sea Ice Extent, Regional Ice Extent and Arctic Sea Ice Concentration Xiaojun Yuan, Cuihua Li, and YiFei Li Prediction model: Linear Markov model for Arctic Sea Ice Seasonal Prediction (Yuan et al., 2015). Pan-Arctic Sea Ice Extent (SIE) Prediction: Based on the observations of sea ice concentrations, SST and atmospheric variables in May, the model predicts that the Pac- Arctic Sea Ice Extent (SIE) will be 4.99 million square kilometers. Regional Sea Ice Concentration Prediction: Predicted September sea ice concentration anomalies and concentrations at grid point are displayed in figure 1. The negative anomalies of ice concentration are larger than 40% from the Beaufort Sea to the Laptev Sea. The concentration anomalies are relative to the climatology of 1979-2012. Method: A linear Markov model has been developed to predict the ice concentration in the pan Arctic region at the seasonal time scale, which represents an original effort of forecasting Arctic sea ice year around with a reduced-dimension statistical model (Yuan et al, 2015, Chen and Yuan, 2004). The model was built to capture co-variabilities in the atmosphere-ocean-sea ice system defined by sea ice concentration, sea surface and air temperature, geopotential height and winds at the 300mb level. Multivariate empirical orthogonal functions (meof) of these variables served as building blocks of the model. A series of model experiments were carried out to determine the dimensions of the model. Based on these experiments, we selected the first 11 meof modes to construct the model. A linear Markov process predicted principle components of these modes, one month at a time. The predicted principle components were then combined with corresponding eigenvectors to produce the final prediction (Yuan et al., 2015). To enhance the prediction in the Pacific sector of the Arctic, a similar linear Markov model was developed for the Pacific region (40-84 N, 120 W-120 E), which focuses on the regional dominant coupled relationships. The regional model significantly improves the season forecast skills in the region, compared to the pan Arctic model (Li et al., submitted). Both pan Arctic and Pacific regional models were developed using 34 years (1980-2012) of NASA team sea ice concentration, ERSST and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis atmospheric variables. The predictive skills of the models were evaluated in a crossvalidated fashion, which is measured by anomaly corrections between predicted and observed ice concentration anomalies and two-model merged results are shown in figure 2a. The models show considerable skills within the Arctic Basin at the end of summer. Particularly, predictive skills for September forecast at 4-month lead are above 0.6 in the Beaufort Sea and Eastern Siberian Sea, and the maximum skill reaches 0.93 north of the Chukchi Sea. The skill of predicting the September Arctic SIE is 0.8 at the 4-month lead time. Uncertainty: The uncertainty of the September Arctic SIE prediction, measured by RMS errors (RMSE), is 0.545 million square kilometers. The uncertainties of sea ice 1

concentration predictions, also measured by RMSE, are shown in figure 2b. Larger RMSE occurs in the marginal seas within the Arctic Basin, where RMSE ranges 20% to 30%. These uncertainties are based on cross-validated experiments using 34-year observations. Executive summary: The prediction is made by linear Markov models, which are capable to predict Arctic sea ice concentrations at grid points 4-month in advance with reasonable skills. The models employ 34 years of monthly time series of sea ice, SST and atmospheric variables. The Pan Arctic SIE calculated from predicted ice concentration in September 2015 is projected to be 4.99 million square kilometers, lower than the observed in 2013 and 2014, but still above the historical low in 2012. The ice concentration is significantly below the 34-year climatology in the Beaufort Sea, Chukchi Sea, East Siberian Sea, Laptev Sea, Kara Sea and Barents Sea. References: Yuan, X., D. Chen, C. Li and L. Wang, Arctic Sea Ice Seasonal Prediction by a Linear Markov Model. In revision. Chen, D. and X. Yuan, A Markov model for seasonal forecast of Antarctic sea ice. Journal of Climate, 17(16), 3156-3168, 2004. Li, Y., X. Yuan, D. Chen, Q. Zhang, C. Li, F. Niu. and Y. Sun, A Regional Model for Seasonal Sea Ice Prediction in the Pacific Sector of the Arctic. Submitted to JGR- Atmospheres. Figure 1. Four-month lead Prediction of September Sea ice concentration anomalies (a) and concentration (b) by the linear Markov model, initialized with May observations of 2

SIC, SST and geopotential heights and winds at 300mb surface. The units are in percentage in both (a) and (b). The results in the region between 120 W and 120 E and south of 84 N are derived from the Pacific regional Markov model and the results in the rest areas are from the pan Arctic model. Figure 2. Cross-validated model skills measured by correlations between model predictions and observations of Arctic sea ice concentration anomalies (a) and model RMSE (b) for four-month lead prediction of September sea ice concentration. Only the correlations that pass the 95% confidence level are shown in (a). The units in (b) are in percentages. The low correlations and low RMSE near the North Pole Hole (the satellite blind spot) are due to low ice variability. The results in the region between 120 W and 120 E and south of 84 N are derived from the Pacific regional Markov model, and the results in the rest areas are from the pan Arctic model. 3