Ph12b Solution Set 4

Similar documents
1 Heisenberg Representation

Free rotation of a rigid body 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon Physics 611, Theoretical Mechanics 5 November 2012

Designing Information Devices and Systems II Spring 2018 J. Roychowdhury and M. Maharbiz Discussion 2A

Representation theory of SU(2), density operators, purification Michael Walter, University of Amsterdam

Physics 504, Lecture 10 Feb. 24, Geometrical Fiber Optics. Last Latexed: February 21, 2011 at 15:11 1

Euler equations for multiple integrals

Homework 3 - Solutions

Schrödinger s equation.

Conservation Laws. Chapter Conservation of Energy

Quantum Mechanics Basic Principles

Differential Geometry of Surfaces

1. At time t = 0, the wave function of a free particle moving in a one-dimension is given by, ψ(x,0) = N

Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions

Hyperbolic Moment Equations Using Quadrature-Based Projection Methods

The derivative of a function f(x) is another function, defined in terms of a limiting expression: f(x + δx) f(x)

Rank, Trace, Determinant, Transpose an Inverse of a Matrix Let A be an n n square matrix: A = a11 a1 a1n a1 a an a n1 a n a nn nn where is the jth col

Determinant and Trace

Math 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan

Robust Forward Algorithms via PAC-Bayes and Laplace Distributions. ω Q. Pr (y(ω x) < 0) = Pr A k

Physics 505 Electricity and Magnetism Fall 2003 Prof. G. Raithel. Problem Set 3. 2 (x x ) 2 + (y y ) 2 + (z + z ) 2

Diagonalization of Matrices Dr. E. Jacobs

Chapter 2 Canonical Correlation Analysis

Problem set 2: Solutions Math 207B, Winter 2016

Example Linear Algebra Competency Test

LeChatelier Dynamics

QUANTUM MECHANICS I PHYS 516. Solutions to Problem Set # 5

Vectors and Matrices

6. Friction and viscosity in gasses

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 9 Jan 2012

Ordinary Differential Equations: Homework 2

MAT 545: Complex Geometry Fall 2008

3. Mathematical Properties of MDOF Systems

SOLUTIONS for Homework #3

Kinematics of Rotations: A Summary

Composition of Haar Paraproducts

Quivers. Virginia, Lonardo, Tiago and Eloy UNICAMP. 28 July 2006

10 Lorentz Group and Special Relativity

Introduction to Quantum Computing

Reflections and Rotations in R 3

Simple Derivation of the Lindblad Equation

8.04 Spring 2013 March 12, 2013 Problem 1. (10 points) The Probability Current

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 10 Apr 2012

State-Space Model for a Multi-Machine System

Anomalous Light Scattering by Topological PT -symmetric Particle Arrays: Supplementary Information

Density matrix equation for a bathed small system and its application to molecular magnets

1 Math 285 Homework Problem List for S2016

The Three-dimensional Schödinger Equation

Linear Algebra Review. Vectors

Composition of Haar Paraproducts

1.3.3 Basis sets and Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization

On a limit theorem for non-stationary branching processes.

Jointly continuous distributions and the multivariate Normal

CHAPTER 1 : DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. 1.1 The definition of a differentiable manifold

Linear First-Order Equations

A Note on Exact Solutions to Linear Differential Equations by the Matrix Exponential

Invariant Extended Kalman Filter: Theory and application to a velocity-aided estimation problem

Lecture 1b. Differential operators and orthogonal coordinates. Partial derivatives. Divergence and divergence theorem. Gradient. A y. + A y y dy. 1b.

Lecture XII. where Φ is called the potential function. Let us introduce spherical coordinates defined through the relations

Linear Algebra (Review) Volker Tresp 2017

3.6. Let s write out the sample space for this random experiment:

The Singular Value Decomposition

Applications of the Wronskian to ordinary linear differential equations

Logarithms. For example:

Summation Formulas. Math Review. Let N > 0, let A, B, and C be constants, and let f and g be any functions. Then: S1: factor out constant

Expansion formula using properties of dot product (analogous to FOIL in algebra): u v 2 u v u v u u 2u v v v u 2 2u v v 2

Sample Solutions from the Student Solution Manual

5-4 Electrostatic Boundary Value Problems

Let N > 0, let A, B, and C be constants, and let f and g be any functions. Then: S2: separate summed terms. S7: sum of k2^(k-1)

Lecture 10: Eigenvectors and eigenvalues (Numerical Recipes, Chapter 11)

Math 19 Sample Final Exam Solutions

Linear Algebra (Review) Volker Tresp 2018

6, Quantum theory of Fluorescence

Potentially useful reading Sakurai and Napolitano, sections 1.5 (Rotation), Schumacher & Westmoreland chapter 2

arxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 8 May 2014

Chapter 6: Energy-Momentum Tensors

Module 9: Further Numbers and Equations. Numbers and Indices. The aim of this lesson is to enable you to: work with rational and irrational numbers

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 3 Feb 1993

1 Parametric Bessel Equation and Bessel-Fourier Series

Math 1271 Solutions for Fall 2005 Final Exam

The Ehrenfest Theorems

Vectors in two dimensions

EC5555 Economics Masters Refresher Course in Mathematics September 2013

Noether s theorem applied to classical electrodynamics

Fall TMA4145 Linear Methods. Exercise set Given the matrix 1 2

Lie symmetry and Mei conservation law of continuum system

MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation

3.7 Implicit Differentiation -- A Brief Introduction -- Student Notes

Basic Calculus Review

Full-State Feedback Design for a Multi-Input System

CKM Matrix I. V ud V us V ub d. d s b

This property turns out to be a general property of eigenvectors of a symmetric A that correspond to distinct eigenvalues as we shall see later.

From Matrix to Tensor. Charles F. Van Loan

6 General properties of an autonomous system of two first order ODE

Sturm-Liouville Theory

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. The Virial Theorem and The Poisson Bracket-1

PHYSICS 234 HOMEWORK 2 SOLUTIONS. So the eigenvalues are 1, 2, 4. To find the eigenvector for ω = 1 we have b c.

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 3

Linear Algebra using Dirac Notation: Pt. 2

Quantum Mechanics C (130C) Winter 2014 Assignment 7

22m:033 Notes: 7.1 Diagonalization of Symmetric Matrices

Transcription:

Ph Solution Set 4 Feruary 5, 00 The state ψ S un E is transforme to p ψ S un E + p a 0 S γ E + S η E Since γ E an η E aren t mutually orthogonal, we can t use this equation irectly to compute the new ensity operator. Instea, we must change to an orthonormal system, as suggeste in the hint. One way to o this is to keep γ E an to take δ E as the secon asis vector, where δ E is etermine y η E ɛ γ E + ɛ ɛ δ E Sustituting into, we get that the new state is p ψ S un E + pa 0 S + ɛ S γ E + p ɛ ɛ S δ E 3 Rememer that if we have a state ψ i S f i E i with f i E normalize an mutually orthogonal, then we calculate the ensity operator y the formula ˆρ i ψ i S ψ i S Working in the asis 0 S, S of S, we have p ψ S a p a p a 0 S + ɛ S p ɛ p ɛ ɛ S p 0 ɛ ɛ

so from 3 we get that the new ensity operator is ˆρ p a a + p a ɛ a ɛ a pɛ a pɛa Comparing this to the original ensity operator ˆρ ψ S ψ S a a a a a lets us rea off that λ pɛ. + pɛ ɛ 0 0 a We egin y analysing the evolution of a single term of the form ψ ψ. If at time t we have ψt ψt, then at time t + t we have ψt + t ψt + t ψt iωt e e ψt ψt + iωt ψt e e ψt ψt iωt e e ψt ψt + iωt ψt ψt e e + ω t e e ψt ψt e e Notice that the right han sie is linear in ψt ψt. Since a ensity operator is a linear comination of ψ i t ψ i t terms, y summing the previous equation over such terms, for an aritrary ensity operator ˆρt we have ˆρt + t ˆρt iωt e e ˆρt + iωtˆρt e e + ω t e e ˆρt e e Now taking the limit of ˆρt+t ˆρt t as t 0 gives ˆρ iω e e ˆρ + iω ˆρ e e 4 t as require. In the asis { g, e }, we have e 0 so e e an Eq. 4 ecomes ρgg ρ iω ge t ρ eg ρ ee 0 ρ eg ρ ee 0 iωρge iωρ eg 0 + iω Componentwise, we get the 4 ifferential equations t ρ gg 0 t ρ ge iωρ ge t ρ eg iωρ eg t ρ ee 0 0 ρ eg ρ ee 0

The solutions of these equations, in terms of initial conitions at t 0, are ρ gg t ρ gg 0 ρ ge t e iωt ρ ge 0 ρ eg t e iωt ρ eg 0 ρ ee t ρ ee 0 so in terms of components of ˆρ0, ˆρt is given y ρgg 0 e ˆρt iωt ρ ge 0 e iωt ρ eg 0 ρ ee 0 c Using the same approach as in part a, if at time t we ha a pure state ˆρt ψt ψt, then at time t + t we have the ensity operator ˆρt + t g g ψt + Γt e e ψt ψt g g + Γt ψt e e + Γt g e ψt Γt ψt e g which can e rewritten as ˆρt + t g g ˆρt g g + Γt e e ˆρt g g + Γt g g ˆρt e e + Γt e e ˆρt e e + Γt g e ˆρt e g Moreover, since this equation is linear in ˆρt, it will still hol for an aritrary mixture of states. Since g, e form an orthonormal asis of the atom s Hilert space, we have g g + e e which we use with the previous equation to get ˆρt + t ˆρt t Γt Γt e e ˆρt g g + g g ˆρt e e t t Γ e e ˆρt e e + Γ g e ˆρt e g an taking the limit t 0, this ecomes ρ t Γ e e ˆρ g g Γ g g ˆρ e e Γ e e ˆρ e e + Γ g e ˆρ e g Again using g g + e e, this can e simplifie to ρ t Γ e e ˆρ Γ ˆρ e e + Γ g e ˆρ e g 5 proving the atom s master equation. 3

Since g 0 an e 0, we can rewrite Eq. 5 in the matrix form as t ρ eg ρ ee Γ Γ 0 ρ eg ρ ee 0 ρgg ρ + Γ ge ρ eg ρ ee Γρee Γ ρ ge Γ ρ eg Γρ ee 0 Componentwise, we get the 4 ifferential equations t ρ gg Γρ ee t ρ ge Γ ρ ge t ρ eg Γ ρ eg t ρ ee Γρ ee ρ eg ρ ee 0 The one for ρ gg is couple with ρ ee, so we start y solving the other three, ρ ge t e Γt/ ρ ge 0 ρ eg t e Γt/ ρ eg 0 ρ ee t e Γt ρ ee 0 Now integrating the equation for ρ gg /t from 0 to t we get ρ gg t ρ gg 0 + e Γt ρ ee 0 so in terms of components of ˆρ0, ˆρt is given y ρgg 0 + e ˆρt Γt ρ ee 0 e Γt/ ρ ge 0 e Γt/ ρ eg 0 e Γt ρ ee 0 e Comining the two ifferential equations gives a new ifferential equation, an we can comine them at the componentwise level, getting t ρ gg Γρ ee t ρ ge Γ + iω ρ ge t ρ eg Γ iω ρ eg t ρ ee Γρ ee 4

As in part, we start y solving the uncouple ifferential equations, getting ρ ge t e Γ +iωt ρ ge 0 ρ eg t e Γ iωt ρ eg 0 ρ ee t e Γt ρ ee 0 after which we integrate the equation for ρ gg, getting ρ gg t ρ gg 0 + e Γt ρ ee 0 To summarize, in terms of components of ˆρ0, ˆρt is given y ρ ˆρt gg 0 + e Γt ρ ee 0 e Γ +iωt ρ ge 0 e Γ iωt ρ eg 0 e Γt ρ ee 0 3 a Since we have / proaility for each of the states ψ H, ψ T, the ensity operator is ˆρ ψ H ψ H + ψ T ψ T 0 + / / / 0 / 3/4 /4 /4 /4 Eigenvalues λ of ˆρ satisfy the characteristic equation which has the solutions 3 4 λ 4 λ 4 4 0 λ ± ± 8 6 c From the equation 3/4 λ± /4 u± 0 /4 /4 λ ± v ± we get u ± + v ± 0. If we focus on normalize eigenvectors, u ± + v±, an comining these two equations gives, after some algera, u± ± / v ± ± / 5

By comparing these with the values of cosπ/8, sinπ/8 which you can calculate using the half-angle formulas, you may notice that u+ cosπ/8 v + sinπ/8 u sinπ/8 v cosπ/8 Another reason to suspect that the angle π/8 woul have something to o with the solution is just y noticing that ψ H, ψ T are vectors with phases 0 an π/4, an since they contriute equally to the ensity operator, it is to e expecte that the ensity operator has some sort of symmetry aroun the axis with angle π/8. 4 a Let M e the matrix ψ a N a,. By the singular value ecomposition, there exist unitary matrices U u ai N a,i an V v j N j, such that M UDV with D ij N i,j a iagonal real N N matrix with nonnegative eigenvalues. In componentwise notation, M UDV ecomes ψ a u ai ij v j i,j which we can use to express ψ as ψ a, a,i,j, ψ a e a f u ai ij v j e a f N N ij u ai e a v j f i,j a Now we use the conition that U an V are unitary. Rememer that unitary matrices correspon to transformations from one orthonormal asis to another. Treating U as a unitary matrix acting on H A, we see that e i u ai e a a efines a new orthonormal asis of H A, an treating V as a unitary matrix acting on H B, we see that f j 6 v j f

efines a new orthonormal asis of H B note that here the summation is in the secon inex of v j, so this transform actually correspons to V T, ut that is irrelevant ecause the transpose of a unitary matrix is again unitary. With these new ases for H A an H B, the state ψ is represente as ψ ij e i f j i,j But rememer that D is a iagonal real matrix with nonnegative eigenvalues! Thus, ij 0 for i j. Denote also p i ii. Then the previous equation ecomes ψ pi e i f i 7 i Since we know that the state is normalize, ψ ψ, which can, y the formula given in the prolem, e expresse componentwise as p i i Thus, N i p i. From Eq. 7, since f i are orthonormal vectors, we get ˆρ A p i e i e i 8 i Since { e i } form an orthonormal asis, in that asis ˆρ a is a iagonal matrix, p 0 0 0 p 0 ˆρ A..... 9. p N Analogously, the ensity operator for system B can e written in asis { f i } as p 0 0 ˆρ B p i f i f i 0 p 0. i.... 0. p N c Since from part we have representations of ˆρ A an ˆρ B as iagonal matrices, their eigenvalues are just the elements on the iagonal. Thus, reaing off from Eqs. 9 an 0 we see that ˆρ A an ˆρ B have the same eigenvalues p, p,..., p N. 7