Categorical tori and their representations A report on work in progress

Similar documents
The program falls into two parts: 1. constructing categorical groups and 2. studying their actions as refined symmetries.

Higher Descent. 1. Descent for Sheaves. 2. Cosimplicial Groups. 3. Back to Sheaves. Amnon Yekutieli. 4. Higher Descent: Stacks. 5.

Formal Homotopy Quantum Field Theories and 2-groups.

Supercategories. Urs July 5, Odd flows and supercategories 4. 4 Braided monoidal supercategories 7

CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS. Contents. 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R)

Thus we get. ρj. Nρj i = δ D(i),j.

Loop Groups and Lie 2-Algebras

Quantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras

LOOP GROUPS AND CATEGORIFIED GEOMETRY. Notes for talk at Streetfest. (joint work with John Baez, Alissa Crans and Urs Schreiber)

The Fundamental Gerbe of a Compact Lie Group

Realization problems in algebraic topology

The Kervaire Invariant One Problem, Talk 0 (Introduction) Independent University of Moscow, Fall semester 2016

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander

Symbol Index Group GermAnal Ring AbMonoid

An Introduction to Kuga Fiber Varieties

The Structure of Compact Groups

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP

9 Artin representations

LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES

Braid group actions on categories of coherent sheaves

NilBott Tower of Aspherical Manifolds and Torus Actions

REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEK 4

Deformation theory of representable morphisms of algebraic stacks

Cohomology and Base Change

Paolo Stellari STABILITY CONDITIONS ON GENERIC K3 SURFACES

A Taxonomy of 2d TQFTs

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

DERIVED HAMILTONIAN REDUCTION

The Nori Fundamental Group Scheme

A QUICK NOTE ON ÉTALE STACKS

Representations and Linear Actions

Lectures on Galois Theory. Some steps of generalizations

Twisted Higher Rank Graph C*-algebras

Two subgroups and semi-direct products

On 2-Representations and 2-Vector Bundles

RAPHAËL ROUQUIER. k( )

2-Gerbes and 2-Tate Spaces

Gauge Theory and Mirror Symmetry

PART II.1. IND-COHERENT SHEAVES ON SCHEMES

LECTURE NOTES IN EQUIVARIANT ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY. Spec k = (G G) G G (G G) G G G G i 1 G e

THE CREMONA GROUP: LECTURE 1

Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces

VECTOR BUNDLES ON THE PROJECTIVE LINE AND FINITE DOMINATION OF CHAIN COMPLEXES

DEFINITION OF ABELIAN VARIETIES AND THE THEOREM OF THE CUBE

Math 210C. Weyl groups and character lattices

THE TATE MODULE. Seminar: Elliptic curves and the Weil conjecture. Yassin Mousa. Z p

Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology

Finite Depth and a Galois Correspondence. Lars Kadison

Real and p-adic Picard-Vessiot fields

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n

Categorical techniques for NC geometry and gravity

NOTES ON RESTRICTED INVERSE LIMITS OF CATEGORIES

Lecture 15: Duality. Next we spell out the answer to Exercise It is part of the definition of a TQFT.

Notes on Langlands proof of local Langlands in the abelian case.

Lie 2-algebras and Higher Gauge Theory. Danny Stevenson Department of Mathematics University of California, Riverside

The Kervaire Invariant One Problem, Lecture 9, Independent University of Moscow, Fall semester 2016

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS JEROEN SIJSLING

FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS OF TOPOLOGICAL STACKS WITH SLICE PROPERTY

Math 210C. The representation ring

Groupoids and Orbifold Cohomology, Part 2

Logarithmic geometry and moduli

Contents. Chapter 3. Local Rings and Varieties Rings of Germs of Holomorphic Functions Hilbert s Basis Theorem 39.

On the modular curve X 0 (23)

Notes on p-divisible Groups

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

LOCAL VS GLOBAL DEFINITION OF THE FUSION TENSOR PRODUCT

Topological K-theory, Lecture 3

A Primer on Homological Algebra

Modules over the noncommutative torus, elliptic curves and cochain quantization

Derived Morita theory and Hochschild Homology and Cohomology of DG Categories

Half the sum of positive roots, the Coxeter element, and a theorem of Kostant

Equivariantly Twisted Cohomology Theories

TCC Homological Algebra: Assignment #3 (Solutions)

(E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger)

Categories and functors

Algebraic aspects of Hadamard matrices

MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA

On the affine homotopy invariance of G-torsors

Tunisian Journal of Mathematics an international publication organized by the Tunisian Mathematical Society

Difference sets and Hadamard matrices

Exercises on chapter 1

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory

PARABOLIC SHEAVES ON LOGARITHMIC SCHEMES

Frobenius Green functors

A SIMPLE PROOF OF BURNSIDE S CRITERION FOR ALL GROUPS OF ORDER n TO BE CYCLIC

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

Beilinson s conjectures I

THERE IS NO Sz(8) IN THE MONSTER

Patrick Iglesias-Zemmour

BERTRAND GUILLOU. s G q+r

A classification of equivariant gerbe connections

Construction of M B, M Dol, M DR

On finite simple braces

Hadamard matrices, difference sets and doubly transitive permutation groups

GALOIS DESCENT AND SEVERI-BRAUER VARIETIES. 1. Introduction

Extended groups and representation theory

Transcription:

Categorical tori and their representations A report on work in progress Nora Ganter Workshop on Infinite-dimensional Structures in Higher Geometry and Representation Theory Hamburg, February 2015

Crossed modules and categorical groups following Noohi (Strict) categorical groups are (strict) monoidal groupoids G 1 s t G 0 with invertible objects (w.r.t. ). A crossed module (G, H, ψ) encodes a strict categorical group G H pr 1 pr 1 ψ group multiplication gives and (gψ(k), h) (g, k) = (g, hk). G Crossed modules consist of groups G and H, a right action of G on H by automorphisms and a homomorphism ψ : H G with ψ(h g ) = g 1 ψ(h)g k ψ(h) = h 1 kh. The crossed module of the categorical group G above is G = G 0 H = ker(s) h g = g 1 h g ψ = t.

Example: the crossed module of a categorical torus Two ingredients: A lattice Λ and a bilinear form J on Λ. From this, we form the crossed module Λ U(1) ψ t := Λ Z R (m, z) m, where the action of x t on Λ U(1) is given by (m, z) x = (m, z e(j(m, x))). Here and throughout the talk, we use the notation e(r) := e 2πir, r R.

Categorical tori The categorical torus T is the strict monoidal category with objects: t, arrows: composition: x z x + m, the obvious one, x t, m Λ, z U(1), multiplication: addition on objects and on arrows z w zw e(j(m, y)) (x x + m) (y y + n) = (x + y x + y + m + n).

Classification Schommer-Pries, Wagemann-Wockel, Carey-Johnson-Murray-Stevenson-Wang Up to equivalence, the categorical torus T only depends on the even symmetric bilinear form More precisely, I (m, n) = J(m, n) + J(n, m). I Bil ev (Λ, Z) S 2 = H 4 (BT ; Z) = H 3 gp(t ; U(1)) classifies the equivalence class of the extension Examples: pt /U(1) T T. 1. T max G maximal torus of a simple and simply connected compact Lie group, Λ coroot lattice, I bas basic bilinear form, 2. (Λ Leech, I ) or another Niemeyer lattice.

Aussie-rules Lie group cohomology Hgp(T 3 ; U(1)) = Ȟ3 (BT ; U(1)) and I corresponds to the Čech-simplicial 3-cocycle T T T 1 d = 3 T T e( J(m, y)) d = 2 T t d (t Λ ) d (t Λ Λ ) d 1 d = 1 where the non-trivial entry is short for ((x, m), (y, n)) e( J(m, y)).

Autoequivalences of the category of coherent sheaves T = Hom(T, U(1)) T C = spec C[ T ] CohT C C[ T ] mod fin 1Aut(CohT C ) ( ) Bimod fin C[ T [Deligne]. ] Inside 1Aut(Coh(T C )), we have the full subcategory of direct image functors f of variety automorphisms f. This categorical group belongs to the crossed module C[ T ] 1 Aut var (T C ), where f acts on C[ T ] by precomposition, ϕ ϕ f.

The basic representation of a categorical torus The basic representation of T is the strict monoidal functor ϱ bas : T 1Aut(Coh(T C )). induced by the map of crossed modules (m, z) z e 2πiJ(m, ) Λ U(1) C[ T ] r bas : ψ 1 t Aut var (T C ) x mult exp(x).

The involution ι The involution ι of T, sending t to t 1 lifts to an involution of T, given by the map of crossed modules (m, z) ( m, z) Λ U(1) Λ U(1) ι: ψ 1 t x t x. This gives rise to an action of the group {±1} by (strict monoidal) functors on the category T.

Extraspecial categorical 2-groups The fixed points of ι on T form the elementary abelian 2-group T {±1} = T [2] = Λ / 2Λ. The categorical fixed points (or equivariant objects) of ι on T form an extension pt /U(1) T {±1} T [2] of the extraspecial 2-group T [2] with Arf invariant φ(m) = 1 2 I (m, m) mod 2Λ. Example: In the example of the Leech lattice, T [2] is the subgroup of the Monster that is usually denoted 2 1+24.

1Automorphisms of the basic representation Let T C {±1} be the categorical group of the crossed module Λ C t C {±1} (m, z) (m, 1), where 1 acts on everything by ι. Extend the basic representation to ϱ bas : T C {±1} 1Aut(Coh(T C )), by setting r bas ( 1) := ι. So, ϱ bas ( 1) := ι. Theorem: The 1automorphisms of this ϱ bas form the extraspecial categorical 2-group T {±1} C.

Normalizers Let ϱ : H G = GL(V ) be a representation of a group H on some vector space. Then Aut(ϱ) = C(ϱ) = {g G c g ϱ = ϱ} is the centralizer of (the image of) ϱ in G. Here c g is conjugation by g. Definition [Dror Farjoun, Segev]: The injective normalizer of ϱ is the subgroup of Aut(H) G defined as N(ϱ) = {(f, g) c g ϱ = ϱ f }. If ϱ is injective, this is the normalizer of its image.

Towards the refined Monster? (In progress) Theorem: The 1automorphisms of T form an extension pt /Λ 1Aut(T ) O(Λ, I ). Here O(Λ, I ) is the group of linear isometries of (Λ, I ). Example: the Conway group O(Λ Leech, I ) = Co 0. In spirit, the subgroup of the Monster, known as 2 1+24.Co 1 = T [2] (Co 0 / {±id}) wants to parametrize the isomorphism classes of some categorical variant of normalizer of ϱ bas : T C {±1} 1Aut(Coh(T C )).