LOCAL CLOSURE FUNCTIONS IN IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

Similar documents
On β-i-open Sets and a Decomposition of Almost-I-continuity

CONNECTEDNESS IN IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

Heyam H. Al-Jarrah Department of Mathematics Faculty of science Yarmouk University Irdid-Jordan

Takashi Noiri, Ahmad Al-Omari, Mohd. Salmi Md. Noorani WEAK FORMS OF OPEN AND CLOSED FUNCTIONS

-HYPERCONNECTED IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

1. Introduction. Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 38, No. 2, 2008, E. Ekici 1, S. Jafari 2, M. Caldas 3 and T. Noiri 4

On Pre-γ-I-Open Sets In Ideal Topological Spaces

ON UPPER AND LOWER WEAKLY I-CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTIONS

A DECOMPOSITION OF CONTINUITY IN IDEAL BY USING SEMI-LOCAL FUNCTIONS

J. Sanabria, E. Acosta, M. Salas-Brown and O. García

A Note on Modifications of rg-closed Sets in Topological Spaces

Role of Ψ Operator in Ideal Supra Topological Spaces

Totally supra b continuous and slightly supra b continuous functions

Upper and Lower α I Continuous Multifunctions

Ideal - Weak Structure Space with Some Applications

On supra b open sets and supra b-continuity on topological spaces

Idealization of some weak separation axioms

On I s g-continuous Functions in Ideal Topological Spaces

P p -Open Sets and P p -Continuous Functions

ON A FINER TOPOLOGICAL SPACE THAN τ θ AND SOME MAPS. E. Ekici. S. Jafari. R.M. Latif

g ωα-separation Axioms in Topological Spaces

Contra Pre-I-Continuous Functions

Contra θ-c-continuous Functions

ON UPPER AND LOWER CONTRA-CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTIONS

ON UPPER AND LOWER CONTRA-ω-CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTIONS

CHARACTERIZATIONS OF RARELY g-continuous MULTIFUNCTIONS

F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I

On z-θ-open Sets and Strongly θ-z-continuous Functions

On Generalized Topology and Minimal Structure Spaces

PAijpam.eu REGULAR WEAKLY CLOSED SETS IN IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

ON γ-s-urysohn CLOSED AND γ-s-regular CLOSED SPACES

N αc Open Sets and Their Basic Properties in Topological Spaces

Some results on g-regular and g-normal spaces

Somewhere Dense Sets and ST 1 -Spaces

COUNTABLY S-CLOSED SPACES

A Note on Mathematical Structures. Key Words: Topology, Generalized topology, Hereditary class, Filter, Semigroup. Contents

AND RELATION BETWEEN SOME WEAK AND STRONG FORMS OF Τ*-OPEN SETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

Supra β-connectedness on Topological Spaces

ON PC-COMPACT SPACES

ON PRE-I-OPEN SETS, SEMI-I-OPEN SETS AND b-i-open SETS IN IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES 1. Erdal Ekici

On bτ-closed sets. Maximilian Ganster and Markus Steiner

PREOPEN SETS AND RESOLVABLE SPACES

Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 6, 2012, no. 21,

Available at: pocetna.html ON A GENERALIZATION OF NORMAL, ALMOST NORMAL AND MILDLY NORMAL SPACES II

Decomposition of continuity via b-open set. Contents. 1 introduction Decompositions of continuity 60

Unification approach to the separation axioms between T 0 and completely Hausdorff

S p -Separation Axioms

OF TOPOLOGICAL SPACES. Zbigniew Duszyński. 1. Preliminaries

Maximilian GANSTER. appeared in: Soochow J. Math. 15 (1) (1989),

On A Weaker Form Of Complete Irresoluteness. Key Words: irresolute function, δ-semiopen set, regular open set. Contents.

RELATIONS BETWEEN UNION AND INTERSECTION OF IDEALS AND THEIR CORRESPONDING IDEAL TOPOLOGIES 1

ON COUNTABLE FAMILIES OF TOPOLOGIES ON A SET

Upper and Lower Rarely α-continuous Multifunctions

On p-closed spaces. Julian Dontchev, Maximilian Ganster and Takashi Noiri

Contra Pre Generalized b - Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces

ON UPPER AND LOWER ALMOST CONTRA-ω-CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTIONS

Semi-Topological Groups

More on sg-compact spaces

ON µ-compact SETS IN µ-spaces

The Journal of Nonlinear Science and Applications

Topological properties defined in terms of generalized open sets

F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I

1. Introduction. Murad Özkoç and Gülhan Aslım. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Volume 40(6) (2011),

On Preclosed Sets and Their Generalizations

Contra-Pre-Semi-Continuous Functions

A new class of generalized delta semiclosed sets using grill delta space

α (β,β) -Topological Abelian Groups

OPERATION-SEPARATION AXIOMS IN BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES

ON GENERALIZED CLOSED SETS

Slightly γ-continuous Functions. Key words: clopen, γ-open, γ-continuity, slightly continuity, slightly γ-continuity. Contents

N. Karthikeyan 1, N. Rajesh 2. Jeppiaar Engineering College Chennai, , Tamilnadu, INDIA 2 Department of Mathematics

On Decompositions of Continuity and α-continuity

Dimension and Continuity on T 0 -Alexandroff Spaces

-θ-semiopen Sets and

Smarandachely Precontinuous maps. and Preopen Sets in Topological Vector Spaces

A New Kupka Type Continuity, λ-compactness and Multifunctions

M. Caldas and S. Jafari. ON SEMI δs-irresolute FUNCTIONS. 1. Introduction and preliminaries

PROPERTIES OF 5-CLOSED SPACES

sb* - Separation axioms

in Topological Spaces

CHARACTERIZATIONS OF HARDLY e-open FUNCTIONS

REGULAR GENERALIZED CLOSED SETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 9(3), 2016, pp

NEUTROSOPHIC NANO IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL STRUCTURES M. Parimala 1, M. Karthika 1, S. Jafari 2, F. Smarandache 3, R. Udhayakumar 4

Nano P S -Open Sets and Nano P S -Continuity

M. Suraiya Begum, M. Sheik John IJSRE Volume 4 Issue 6 June 2016 Page 5466

rgα-interior and rgα-closure in Topological Spaces

SOME NEW SEPARATION AXIOMS. R. Balaji 1, N. Rajesh 2. Agni College of Technology Kancheepuram, , TamilNadu, INDIA 2 Department of Mathematics

Topological groups with dense compactly generated subgroups

Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology SJST R1 Al Ghour. L-open sets and L^*-open sets

On a Question of Maarten Maurice

ON SPACES IN WHICH COMPACT-LIKE SETS ARE CLOSED, AND RELATED SPACES

On Almost Continuity and Expansion of Open Sets

THE NON-URYSOHN NUMBER OF A TOPOLOGICAL SPACE

Generalized Near Rough Connected Topologized Approximation Spaces

Introduction to generalized topological spaces

Separation Spaces in Generalized Topology

ON PRE GENERALIZED B-CLOSED SET IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES. S. Sekar 1, R. Brindha 2

Topology. Xiaolong Han. Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA address:

ON MAXIMAL, MINIMAL OPEN AND CLOSED SETS

Transcription:

Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 43, No. 2, 2013, 139-149 LOCAL CLOSURE FUNCTIONS IN IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES Ahmad Al-Omari 1 and Takashi Noiri 2 Abstract. In this paper, (X, τ, I) denotes an ideal topological space. Analogously to the local function [2], we define an operator Γ(A)(I, τ) called the local closure function of A with respect to I and τ as follows: Γ(A)(I, τ) = {x X : A Cl(U) / I for every U τ(x)}. We investigate properties of Γ(A)(I, τ). Moreover, by using Γ(A)(I, τ), we introduce an operator Ψ Γ : P(X) τ satisfying Ψ Γ(A) = X Γ(X A) for each A P(X). We set σ = {A X : A Ψ Γ(A)} and σ 0 = {A X : A Int(Cl(Ψ Γ(A)))} and show that τ θ σ σ 0. AMS Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 54A05, 54C10 Key words and phrases: ideal topological space, local function, local closure function 1. Introduction and preliminaries Let (X, τ) be a topological space with no separation properties assumed. For a subset A of a topological space (X, τ), Cl(A) and Int(A) denote the closure and the interior of A in (X, τ), respectively. An ideal I on a topological space (X, τ) is a non-empty collection of subsets of X which satisfies the following properties: 1. A I and B A implies that B I. 2. A I and B I implies A B I. An ideal topological space is a topological space (X, τ) with an ideal I on X and is denoted by (X, τ, I). For a subset A X, A (I, τ) = {x X : A U / I for every open set U containing x} is called the local function of A with respect to I and τ (see [1], [2]). We simply write A instead of A (I, τ) in case there is no chance for confusion. For every ideal topological space (X, τ, I), there exists a topology τ (I), finer than τ, generating by the base β(i, τ) = {U J : U τ and J I}. It is known in Example 3.6 of [2] that β(i, τ) is not always a topology. When there is no ambiguity, τ (I) is denoted by τ. Recall that A is said to be -dense in itself (resp. τ -closed, -perfect) if A A (resp. A A, A = A ). For a subset A X, Cl (A) and Int (A) will denote the closure and the interior of A in (X, τ ), respectively. In 1968, Veličko [6] introduced the class of θ-open sets. A set A is said to be θ-open [6] if every point of A 1 Al al-bayt University, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Mathematics P.O. Box 130095, Mafraq 25113, Jordan, e-mail: omarimutah1@yahoo.com 2 2949-1 Shiokita-cho, Hinagu, Yatsushiro-shi, Kumamoto-ken, 869-5142 Japan, e-mail: t.noiri@nifty.com

140 Ahmad Al-Omari, Takashi Noiri has an open neighborhood whose closure is contained in A. The θ-interior [6] of A in X is the union of all θ-open subsets of A and is denoted by Int θ (A). Naturally, the complement of a θ-open set is said to be θ-closed. Equivalently, Cl θ (A) = {x X : Cl(U) A ϕ for every U τ(x)} and a set A is θ-closed if and only if A = Cl θ (A). Note that all θ-open sets form a topology on X which is coarser than τ, and is denoted by τ θ and that a space (X, τ) is regular if and only if τ = τ θ. Note also that the θ-closure of a given set need not be a θ-closed set. In this paper, analogously to the local function A (I, τ), we define an operator Γ(A)(I, τ) called the local closure function of A with respect to I and τ as follows: Γ(A)(I, τ) = {x X : A Cl(U) / I for every U τ(x)}. We investigate properties of Γ(A)(I, τ). Moreover, we introduce an operator Ψ Γ : P(X) τ satisfying Ψ Γ (A) = X Γ(X A) for each A P(X). We set σ = {A X : A Ψ Γ (A)} and σ 0 = {A X : A Int(Cl(Ψ Γ (A)))} and show that τ θ σ σ 0. 2. Local closure functions Definition 2.1. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. For a subset A of X, we define the following operator: Γ(A)(I, τ) = {x X : A Cl(U) / I for every U τ(x)}, where τ(x) = {U τ : x U}. In case there is no confusion Γ(A)(I, τ) is briefly denoted by Γ(A) and is called the local closure function of A with respect to I and τ. Lemma 2.2. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. Γ(A)(I, τ) for every subset A of X. Then A (I, τ) Proof. Let x A (I, τ). Then, A U / I for every open set U containing x. Since A U A Cl(U), we have A Cl(U) / I and hence x Γ(A)(I, τ). Example 2.3. Let X = {a, b, c, d}, τ = {ϕ, X, {a, c}, {d}, {a, c, d}}, and I = {ϕ, {c}}. Let A = {b, c, d}. Then Γ(A) = {a, b, c, d} and A = {b, d}. Example 2.4. Let (X, τ) be the real numbers with the left-ray topology, i.e. τ = {(, a) : a X} {X, ϕ}. Let I f be the ideal of all finite subsets of X. Let A = [0, 1]. Then Γ(A) = {x X : A Cl(U) = A / I f for every U τ(x)} = X and 1 / A which shows A Γ(A). Lemma 2.5. Let (X, τ) be a topological space and A be a subset of X. Then 1. If A is open, then Cl(A) = Cl θ (A). 2. If A is closed, then Int(A) = Int θ (A). Theorem 2.6. Let (X, τ) be a topological space, I and J be two ideals on X, and let A and B be subsets of X. Then the following properties hold: 1. If A B, then Γ(A) Γ(B).

Local closure functions in ideal topological spaces 141 2. If I J, then Γ(A)(I) Γ(A)(J ). 3. Γ(A) = Cl(Γ(A)) Cl θ (A) and Γ(A) is closed. 4. If A Γ(A) and Γ(A) is open, then Γ(A) = Cl θ (A). 5. If A I, then Γ(A) =. Proof. (1) Suppose that x / Γ(B). Then there exists U τ(x) such that B Cl(U) I. Since A Cl(U) B Cl(U), A Cl(U) I. Hence x / Γ(A). Thus X \ Γ(B) X \ Γ(A) or Γ(A) Γ(B). (2) Suppose that x / Γ(A)(I). There exists U τ(x) such that A Cl(U) I. Since I J, A Cl(U) J and x / Γ(A)(J ). Therefore, Γ(A)(J ) Γ(A)(I). (3) We have Γ(A) Cl(Γ(A)) in general. Let x Cl(Γ(A)). Then Γ(A) U for every U τ(x). Therefore, there exists some y Γ(A) U and U τ(y). Since y Γ(A), A Cl(U) / I and hence x Γ(A). Hence we have Cl(Γ(A)) Γ(A) and hence Γ(A) = Cl(Γ(A)). Again, let x Cl(Γ(A)) = Γ(A), then A Cl(U) / I for every U τ(x). This implies A Cl(U) for every U τ(x). Therefore, x Cl θ (A). This shows that Γ(A)(I) = Cl(Γ(A)) Cl θ (A). (4) For any subset A of X, by (3) we have Γ(A) = Cl(Γ(A)) Cl θ (A). Since A Γ(A) and Γ(A) is open, by Lemma 2.5, Cl θ (A) Cl θ (Γ(A)) = Cl(Γ(A)) = Γ(A) Cl θ (A) and hence Γ(A) = Cl θ (A). (5) Suppose that x Γ(A). Then for any U τ(x), A Cl(U) / I. But since A I, A Cl(U) I for every U τ(x). This is a contradiction. Hence Γ(A) =. Lemma 2.7. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. If U τ θ, then U Γ(A) = U Γ(U A) Γ(U A) for any subset A of X. Proof. Suppose that U τ θ and x U Γ(A). Then x U and x Γ(A). Since U τ θ, then there exists W τ such that x W Cl(W ) U. Let V be any open set containing x. Then V W τ(x) and Cl(V W ) A / I and hence Cl(V ) (U A) / I. This shows that x Γ(U A) and hence we obtain U Γ(A) Γ(U A). Moreover, U Γ(A) U Γ(U A) and by Theorem 2.6 Γ(U A) Γ(A) and U Γ(U A) U Γ(A). Therefore, U Γ(A) = U Γ(U A). Theorem 2.8. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A, B any subsets of X. Then the following properties hold: 1. Γ( ) =. 2. Γ(A) Γ(B) = Γ(A B). Proof. (1) The proof is obvious. (2) It follows from Theorem 2.6 that Γ(A B) Γ(A) Γ(B). To prove the reverse inclusion, let x / Γ(A) Γ(B). Then x belongs neither to Γ(A) nor to Γ(B). Therefore there exist U x, V x τ(x) such that Cl(U x ) A I and

142 Ahmad Al-Omari, Takashi Noiri Cl(V x ) B I. Since I is additive, (Cl(U x ) A) (Cl(V x ) B) I. Moreover, since I is hereditary and (Cl(U x ) A) (Cl(V x ) B) = [(Cl(U x ) A) Cl(V x )] [(Cl(U x ) A) B] = (Cl(U x ) Cl(V x )) (A Cl(V x )) (Cl(U x ) B) (A B) Cl(U x V x ) (A B), Cl(U x V x ) (A B) I. Since U x V x τ(x), x / Γ(A B). Hence (X \ Γ(A)) (X \ Γ(B) X \ Γ(A B) or Γ(A B) Γ(A) Γ(B). Hence we obtain Γ(A) Γ(B) = Γ(A B). Lemma 2.9. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A, B be subsets of X. Then Γ(A) Γ(B) = Γ(A B) Γ(B). Proof. We have by Theorem 2.8 Γ(A) = Γ[(A B) (A B)] = Γ(A B) Γ(A B) Γ(A B) Γ(B). Thus Γ(A) Γ(B) Γ(A B) Γ(B). By Theorem 2.6, Γ(A B) Γ(A) and hence Γ(A B) Γ(B) Γ(A) Γ(B). Hence Γ(A) Γ(B) = Γ(A B) Γ(B). Corollary 2.10. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A, B be subsets of X with B I. Then Γ(A B) = Γ(A) = Γ(A B). Proof. Since B I, by Theorem 2.6 Γ(B) =. By Lemma 2.9, Γ(A) = Γ(A B) and by Theorem 2.8 Γ(A B) = Γ(A) Γ(B) = Γ(A) 3. Closure compatibility of topological spaces Definition 3.1. [4] Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. We say the τ is compatible with the ideal I, denoted τ I, if the following holds for every A X, if for every x A there exists U τ(x) such that U A I, then A I. Definition 3.2. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. We say the τ is closure compatible with the ideal I, denoted τ Γ I, if the following holds for every A X, if for every x A there exists U τ(x) such that Cl(U) A I, then A I. Remark 3.3. If τ is compatible with I, then τ is closure compatible with I. Theorem 3.4. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space, the following properties are equivalent: 1. τ Γ I; 2. If a subset A of X has a cover of open sets each of whose closure intersection with A is in I, then A I; 3. For every A X, A Γ(A) = implies that A I;

Local closure functions in ideal topological spaces 143 4. For every A X, A Γ(A) I; 5. For every A X, if A contains no nonempty subset B with B Γ(B), then A I. Proof. (1) (2): The proof is obvious. (2) (3): Let A X and x A. Then x / Γ(A) and there exists V x τ(x) such that Cl(V x ) A I. Therefore, we have A {V x : x A} and V x τ(x) and by (2) A I. (3) (4): For any A X, A Γ(A) A and (A Γ(A)) Γ(A Γ(A)) (A Γ(A)) Γ(A) =. By (3), A Γ(A) I. (4) (5): By (4), for every A X, A Γ(A) I. Let A Γ(A) = J I, then A = J (A Γ(A)) and by Theorem 2.8(2) and Theorem 2.6(5), Γ(A) = Γ(J) Γ(A Γ(A)) = Γ(A Γ(A)). Therefore, we have A Γ(A) = A Γ(A Γ(A)) Γ(A Γ(A)) and A Γ(A) A. By the assumption A Γ(A) = and hence A = A Γ(A) I. (5) (1): Let A X and assume that for every x A, there exists U τ(x) such that Cl(U) A I. Then A Γ(A) =. Suppose that A contains B such that B Γ(B). Then B = B Γ(B) A Γ(A) =. Therefore, A contains no nonempty subset B with B Γ(B). Hence A I. Theorem 3.5. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. If τ is closure compatible with I, then the following equivalent properties hold: 1. For every A X, A Γ(A) = implies that Γ(A) = ; 2. For every A X, Γ(A Γ(A)) = ; 3. For every A X, Γ(A Γ(A)) = Γ(A). Proof. First, we show that (1) holds if τ is closure compatible with I. Let A be any subset of X and A Γ(A) =. By Theorem 3.4, A I and by Theorem 2.6 (5) Γ(A) =. (1) (2): Assume that for every A X, A Γ(A) = implies that Γ(A) =. Let B = A Γ(A), then B Γ(B) = (A Γ(A)) Γ(A Γ(A)) = (A (X Γ(A))) Γ(A (X Γ(A))) [A (X Γ(A))] [Γ(A) (Γ(X Γ(A)))] =. By (1), we have Γ(B) =. Hence Γ(A Γ(A)) =. (2) (3): Assume for every A X, Γ(A Γ(A)) =. A = (A Γ(A)) (A Γ(A)) Γ(A) = Γ[(A Γ(A)) (A Γ(A))] = Γ(A Γ(A)) Γ(A Γ(A)) = Γ(A Γ(A)). (3) (1): Assume for every A X, A Γ(A) = and Γ(A Γ(A)) = Γ(A). This implies that = Γ( ) = Γ(A).

144 Ahmad Al-Omari, Takashi Noiri Theorem 3.6. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space, then the following properties are equivalent: 1. Cl(τ) I =, where Cl(τ) = {Cl(V ) : V τ}; 2. If I I, then Int θ (I) = ; 3. For every clopen G, G Γ(G); 4. X = Γ(X). Proof. (1) (2): Let Cl(τ) I = and I I. Suppose that x Int θ (I). Then there exists U τ such that x U Cl(U) I. Since I I and hence = {x} Cl(U) Cl(τ) I. This is contrary to Cl(τ) I =. Therefore, Int θ (I) =. (2) (3): Let x G. Assume x / Γ(G), then there exists U x τ(x) such that G Cl(U x ) I and hence G U x I. Since G is clopen, by (2) and Lemma 2.5, x G U x = Int(G U x ) Int(G Cl(U x )) = Int θ (G Cl(U x )) =. This is a contradiction. Hence x Γ(G) and G Γ(G). (3) (4): Since X is clopen, then X = Γ(X). (4) (1): X = Γ(X) = {x X : Cl(U) X = Cl(U) / I for each open set U containing x}. Hence Cl(τ) I =. Theorem 3.7. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space, τ be closure compatible with I. Then for every G τ θ and any subset A of X, Cl(Γ(G A)) = Γ(G A) Γ(G Γ(A)) Cl θ (G Γ(A)). Proof. By Theorem 3.5(3) and Theorem 2.6, we have Γ(G A) = Γ((G A) Γ(G A)) Γ(G Γ(A)). Moreover, by Theorem 2.6, Cl(Γ(G A)) = Γ(G A) Γ(G Γ(A)) Cl θ (G Γ(A)). 4. Ψ Γ -operator Definition 4.1. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. An operator Ψ Γ : P(X) τ is defined as follows: for every A X, Ψ Γ (A) = {x X : there exists U τ(x) such that Cl(U) A I} and observe that Ψ Γ (A) = X Γ(X A). Several basic facts concerning the behavior of the operator Ψ Γ are included in the following theorem. Theorem 4.2. properties hold: Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. Then the following 1. If A X, then Ψ Γ (A) is open. 2. If A B, then Ψ Γ (A) Ψ Γ (B). 3. If A, B P(X), then Ψ Γ (A B) = Ψ Γ (A) Ψ Γ (B). 4. If A X, then Ψ Γ (A) = Ψ Γ (Ψ Γ (A)) if and only if Γ(X A) = Γ(Γ(X A)).

Local closure functions in ideal topological spaces 145 5. If A I, then Ψ Γ (A) = X Γ(X). 6. If A X, I I, then Ψ Γ (A I) = Ψ Γ (A). 7. If A X, I I, then Ψ Γ (A I) = Ψ Γ (A). 8. If (A B) (B A) I, then Ψ Γ (A) = Ψ Γ (B). Proof. (1) This follows from Theorem 2.6 (3). (2) This follows from Theorem 2.6 (1). (3) Ψ Γ (A B) =X Γ(X (A B)) (4) This follows from the facts: 1. Ψ Γ (A) = X Γ(X A). =X Γ[(X A) (X B)] =X [Γ(X A) Γ(X B)] =[X Γ(X A) [X Γ(X B)] =Ψ Γ (A) Ψ Γ (B). 2. Ψ Γ (Ψ Γ (A)) = X Γ[X (X Γ(X A))] = X Γ(Γ(X A)). (5) By Corollary 2.10 we obtain that Γ(X A) = Γ(X) if A I. (6) This follows from Corollary 2.10 and Ψ Γ (A I) = X Γ[X (A I)] = X Γ[(X A) I] = X Γ(X A) = Ψ Γ (A). (7) This follows from Corollary 2.10 and Ψ Γ (A I) = X Γ[X (A I)] = X Γ[(X A) I] = X Γ(X A) = Ψ Γ (A). (8) Assume (A B) (B A) I. Let A B = I and B A = J. Observe that I, J I by heredity. Also observe that B = (A I) J. Thus Ψ Γ (A) = Ψ Γ (A I) = Ψ[(A I) J] = Ψ Γ (B) by (6) and (7). Corollary 4.3. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. Then U Ψ Γ (U) for every θ-open set U X. Proof. We know that Ψ Γ (U) = X Γ(X U). Now Γ(X U) Cl θ (X U) = X U, since X U is θ-closed. Therefore, U = X (X U) X Γ(X U) = Ψ Γ (U). Now we give an example of a set A which is not θ-open but satisfies A Ψ Γ (A). Example 4.4. Let X = {a, b, c, d}, τ = {ϕ, X, {a, c}, {d}, {a, c, d}}, and I = {ϕ, {b}, {c}, {b, c}}. Let A = {a}. Then Ψ Γ ({a}) = X Γ(X {a}) = X Γ({b, c, d}) = X {b, d} = {a, c}. Therefore, A Ψ Γ (A), but A is not θ-open. Example 4.5. Let (X, τ) be the real numbers with the left-ray topology, i.e. τ = {(, a) : a X} {X, ϕ}. Let I f be the ideal of all finite subsets of X. Let A = X {0, 1}. Then Ψ Γ ({A}) = X Γ({0, 1}) = X. Therefore, A Ψ Γ (A), but A is not θ-open.

146 Ahmad Al-Omari, Takashi Noiri Theorem 4.6. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A X. Then the following properties hold: 1. Ψ Γ (A) = {U τ : Cl(U) A I}. 2. Ψ Γ (A) {U τ : (Cl(U) A) (A Cl(U)) I}. Proof. (1) This follows immediately from the definition of Ψ Γ -operator. (2) Since I is heredity, it is obvious that {U τ : (Cl(U) A) (A Cl(U)) I} {U τ : Cl(U) A I} = Ψ Γ (A) for every A X. Theorem 4.7. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. If σ = {A X : A Ψ Γ (A)}. Then σ is a topology for X. Proof. Let σ = {A X : A Ψ Γ (A)}. Since ϕ I, by Theorem 2.6(5) Γ(ϕ) = ϕ and Ψ Γ (X) = X Γ(X X) = X Γ(ϕ) = X. Moreover, Ψ Γ (ϕ) = X Γ(X ϕ) = X X = ϕ. Therefore, we obtain that ϕ Ψ Γ (ϕ) and X Ψ Γ (X) = X, and thus ϕ and X σ. Now if A, B σ, then by Theorem 4.2 A B Ψ Γ (A) Ψ Γ (B) = Ψ Γ (A B) which implies that A B σ. If {A α : α } σ, then A α Ψ Γ (A α ) Ψ Γ ( A α ) for every α and hence A α Ψ Γ ( A α ). This shows that σ is a topology. Lemma 4.8. Int(Cl(B)). If either A τ or B τ, then Int(Cl(A B)) = Int(Cl(A)) Proof. This is an immediate consequence of Lemma 3.5 of [5]. Theorem 4.9. Let σ 0 = {A X : A Int(Cl(Ψ Γ (A)))}, then σ 0 is a topology for X. Proof. By Theorem 4.2, for any subset A of X, Ψ Γ (A) is open and σ σ 0. Therefore,, X σ 0. Let A, B σ 0. Then by Lemma 4.8 and Theorem 4.2, we have A B Int(Cl(Ψ Γ (A))) Int(Cl(Ψ Γ (B))) = Int(Cl(Ψ Γ (A) Ψ Γ (B))) = Int(Cl(Ψ Γ (A B))). Therefore, A B σ 0. Let A α σ 0 for each α. By Theorem 4.2, for each α, A α Int(Cl(Ψ Γ (A α ))) Int(Cl(Ψ Γ ( A α ))) and hence A α Int(Cl(Ψ Γ ( A α ))). Hence A α σ 0. This shows that σ 0 is a topology for X. By Theorem 4.2 and Corollary 4.3 the following relations holds: θ-open open σ-open σ 0 -open Remark 4.10. 1. In Example 4.4, A is σ-open but it is not open. Therefore, every σ 0 -open set is not open.

Local closure functions in ideal topological spaces 147 2. Let X = {a, b, c} with τ = {, {a}, {b}, {a, b}, {a, c}, X} and I = {ϕ, {a}} be an ideal on X. We observe that {a} is open but it is not σ 0 -open sets, since Ψ Γ ({a}) = X Γ({b, c}) = X X = ϕ. Also, {c} is not open but it is σ-open set, since Ψ Γ ({c}) = X Γ({a, b}) = X {b} = {a, c}. 3. Question: Is there an example which shows that σ σ 0?. Theorem 4.11. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. Then τ Γ I if and only if Ψ Γ (A) A I for every A X. Proof. Necessity. Assume τ Γ I and let A X. Observe that x Ψ Γ (A) A if and only if x / A and x / Γ(X A) if and only if x / A and there exists U x τ(x) such that Cl(U x ) A I if and only if there exists U x τ(x) such that x Cl(U x ) A I. Now, for each x Ψ Γ (A) A and U x τ(x), Cl(U x ) (Ψ Γ (A) A) I by heredity and hence Ψ Γ (A) A I by assumption that τ Γ I. Sufficiency. Let A X and assume that for each x A there exists U x τ(x) such that Cl(U x ) A I. Observe that Ψ Γ (X A) (X A) = A Γ(A) = {x : there exists U x τ(x) such that x Cl(U x ) A I}. Thus we have A Ψ Γ (X A) (X A) I and hence A I by heredity of I. Proposition 4.12. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space with τ Γ I, A X. If N is a nonempty open subset of Γ(A) Ψ Γ (A), then N A I and Cl(N) A / I. Proof. If N Γ(A) Ψ Γ (A), then N A Ψ Γ (A) A I by Theorem 4.11 and hence N A I by heredity. Since N τ {ϕ} and N Γ(A), we have Cl(N) A / I by the definition of Γ(A). In [3], Newcomb defines A = B [mod I] if (A B) (B A) I and observes that = [mod I] is an equivalence relation. By Theorem 4.2 (8), we have that if A = B [mod I], then Ψ Γ (A) = Ψ Γ (B). Definition 4.13. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. A subset A of X is called a Baire set with respect to τ and I, denoted A B r (X, τ, I), if there exists a θ-open set U such that A = U [mod I]. Lemma 4.14. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space with τ Γ I. If U, V τ θ and Ψ Γ (U) = Ψ Γ (V ), then U = V [mod I]. Proof. Since U τ θ, by Corollary 4.3 we have U Ψ Γ (U) and hence U V Ψ Γ (U) V = Ψ Γ (V ) V I by Theorem 4.11. Therefore, U V I. Similarly, V U I. Now, (U V ) (V U) I by additivity. Hence U = V [mod I]. Theorem 4.15. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space with τ Γ I. If A, B B r (X, τ, I), and Ψ Γ (A) = Ψ Γ (B), then A = B [mod I].

148 Ahmad Al-Omari, Takashi Noiri Proof. Let U, V τ θ be such that A = U [mod I] and B = V [mod I]. Now Ψ Γ (A) = Ψ Γ (U) and Ψ Γ (B) = Ψ Γ (V ) by Theorem 4.2(8). Since Ψ Γ (A) = Ψ Γ (B) implies that Ψ Γ (U) = Ψ Γ (V ) and hence U = V [mod I] by Lemma 4.14. Hence A = B [mod I] by transitivity. Proposition 4.16. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. 1. If B B r (X, τ, I) I, then there exists A τ θ {ϕ} such that B = A [mod I]. 2. Let Cl(τ) I = ϕ, then B B r (X, τ, I) I if and only if there exists A τ θ {ϕ} such that B = A [mod I]. Proof. (1) Assume B B r (X, τ, I) I, then B B r (X, τ, I). Hence there exists A τ θ such that B = A [mod I]. If A = ϕ, then we have B = ϕ [mod I]. This implies that B I which is a contradiction. (2) Assume there exists A τ θ {ϕ} such that B = A [mod I], hence by Definition 4.13, B B r (X, τ, I). Then A = (B J) I, where J = B A, I = A B I. If B I, then A I by heredity and additivity. Since A τ θ {ϕ}, A ϕ and there exists U τ such that ϕ U Cl(U) A. Since A I, Cl(U) I and hence Cl(U) Cl(τ) I. This contradicts that Cl(τ) I = ϕ. Proposition 4.17. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space with τ I = ϕ. If B B r (X, τ, I) I, then Ψ Γ (B) Int θ (Γ(B)) ϕ. Proof. Assume B B r (X, τ, I) I, then by Proposition 4.16(1), there exists A τ θ {ϕ} such that B = A [mod I]. By Theorem 3.6 and Lemma 2.7, A = A X = A Γ(X) Γ(A X) = Γ(A). This implies that ϕ A Γ(A) = Γ((B J) I) = Γ(B), where J = B A, I = A B I by Corollary 2.10. Since A τ θ, A Int θ (Γ(B)). Also, ϕ A Ψ Γ (A) = Ψ Γ (B) by Corollary 4.3 and Theorem 4.2(8). Consequently, we obtain A Ψ Γ (B) Int θ (Γ(B)). Given an ideal topological space (X, τ, I), let U(X, τ, I) denote {A X : there exists B B r (X, τ, I) I such that B A}. Proposition 4.18. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space with τ I = ϕ. If τ = τ θ, then the following statements are equivalent: 1. A U(X, τ, I); 2. Ψ Γ (A) Int θ (Γ(A)) ϕ; 3. Ψ Γ (A) Γ(A) ϕ; 4. Ψ Γ (A) ϕ; 5. Int (A) ϕ; 6. There exists N τ {ϕ} such that N A I and N A / I.

Local closure functions in ideal topological spaces 149 Proof. (1) (2): Let B B r (X, τ, I) I such that B A. Then Int θ (Γ(B)) Int θ (Γ(A)) and Ψ Γ (B) Ψ Γ (A) and hence Int θ (Γ(B)) Ψ Γ (B) Int θ (Γ(A)) Ψ Γ (A). By Proposition 4.17, we have Ψ Γ (A) Int θ (Γ(A)) ϕ. (2) (3): The proof is obvious. (3) (4): The proof is obvious. (4) (5): If Ψ Γ (A) ϕ, then there exists U τ {ϕ} such that U A I. Since U / I and U = (U A) (U A), we have U A / I. By Theorem 4.2, ϕ (U A) Ψ Γ (U) A = Ψ Γ ((U A) (U A)) A = Ψ Γ (U A) A Ψ Γ (A) A = Int (A). Hence Int (A) ϕ. (5) (6): If Int (A) ϕ, then by Theorem 3.1 of [2] there exists N τ {ϕ} and I I such that ϕ N I A. We have N A I, N = (N A) (N A) and N / I. This implies that N A / I. (6) (1): Let B = N A / I with N τ θ {ϕ} and N A I. Then B B r (X, τ, I) I since B / I and (B N) (N B) = N A I. Theorem 4.19. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space with τ Γ I, where Cl(τ) I = ϕ. Then for A X, Ψ Γ (A) Γ(A). Proof. Suppose x Ψ Γ (A) and x / Γ(A). Then there exists a nonempty neighborhood U x τ(x) such that Cl(U x ) A I. Since x Ψ Γ (A), by Theorem 4.6 x {U τ : Cl(U) A I} and there exists V τ(x) and Cl(V ) A I. Now we have U x V τ(x), Cl(U x V ) A I and Cl(U x V ) A I by heredity. Hence by finite additivity we have Cl(U x V ) A) (Cl(U x V ) A) = Cl(U x V ) I. Since (U x V ) τ(x), this is contrary to Cl(τ) I = ϕ. Therefore, x Γ(A). This implies that Ψ Γ (A) Γ(A). Acknowledgement The authors wish to thank the referee for useful comments and suggestions. References [1] Al-omari, A., Noiri, T., A topology via M-local functions in ideal m-spaces. Questions and Answers in General Topology, 30 (2012), 105-114. [2] Janković, D., Hamlet, T. R., New topologies from old via ideals. Amer. Math. Monthly, 97 (1990), 295-310. [3] Newcomb, R. L., Topologies which are compact modulo an ideal. Ph. D. Dissertation, Univ. of Cal. at Santa Barbara, 1967. [4] Njåstad, O., Remarks on topologies defined by local properties. Anh. Norske Vid.-Akad. Oslo (N. S.), 8 (1966), 1-6. [5] Noiri, T., On α-continuous functions. Casopis Pest. Mat. 109 (1984), 118-126. [6] Veličko, N. V., H -closed topological spaces. Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 78 (1968), 103-118. Received by the editors March 1, 2013