PANDA Muon System Prototype

Similar documents
The experiment at JINR: status and physics program

STATUS OF ATLAS TILE CALORIMETER AND STUDY OF MUON INTERACTIONS. 1 Brief Description of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters

Performance of the ALICE Muon Trigger system in Pb Pb collisions

Experimental overview of the PANDA experiment

PoS(HCP2009)042. Status of the ALICE Experiment. Werner Riegler. For the ALICE Collaboration. CERN

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

PANDA FAIR. Anastasios Belias for the PANDA Collaboration GSI, Darmstadt, Germany. EXA2017, Vienna September 15th, 2017

Examples for experiments that can be done at the T9 beam line

Track measurement in the high multiplicity environment at the CBM Experiment

PoS(BORMIO2016)013. PANDA Forward Spectrometer Calorimeter. P.A. Semenov IHEP NRC KI S.I. Bukreeva IHEP NRC KI ITEP NRC KI

Overview of the PandaRoot Framework

PoS(KAON)049. Testing the µ e universality with K ± l ± ν decays

Information about the T9 beam line and experimental facilities

New Hadroproduction results from the HARP/PS214 experiment at CERN PS

THE FORWARD DETECTOR OF THE ANKE SPECTROMETER. SCINTILLATION AND CHERENKOV HODOSCOPES

Simulation and validation of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter response

The ALICE Inner Tracking System Off-line Software

Light ion recoil detector

Barrel time-of-flight (TOF) detector for the PANDA experiment at FAIR

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 19 Jun 2004

What detectors measure

Experimental results on the atmospheric muon charge ratio

Thin Calorimetry for Cosmic-Ray Studies Outside the Earth s Atmosphere. 1 Introduction

ATLAS EXPERIMENT : HOW THE DATA FLOWS. (Trigger, Computing, and Data Analysis)

Heavy Hadron Production and Spectroscopy at ATLAS

The NUCLEON Space Experiment Preliminary Results. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, , Russia

Efficiency of the CMS Level-1 Trigger to. Selected Physics Channels

Recent results at the -meson region from the CMD-3 detector at the VEPP-2000 collider

Particle production vs. energy: how do simulation results match experimental measurements?

Simulation of GEM-TPC Prototype for the Super-FRS Beam Diagnostics System at FAIR

PoS(TIPP2014)093. Performance study of the TOP counter with the 2 GeV/c positron beam at LEPS. K. Matsuoka, For the Belle II PID group

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 15 Oct 2004

B and Upsilon Cross Sections at HERA-B

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. First Physics at CMS

PAMELA: a Satellite Experiment for Antiparticles Measurement in Cosmic Rays

Digital Imaging Calorimetry for Precision Electromagnetic and Hadronic Interaction Measurements

COMET muon conversion experiment in J-PARC

Track Reconstruction and Muon Identification in the Muon Detector of the CBM Experiment at FAIR

MuSIC- RCNP at Osaka University

Aerial view of the FAIR construction site.

Vol. 5 (2012) Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement No 4 PANDA AT FAIR. Tord Johansson. representing the PANDA Collaboration

Threshold photoproduction of J/y with the GlueX experiment. Lubomir Pentchev Jefferson Lab for the GlueX collaboration

Muoproduction of exotic charmonia at COMPASS

Theory English (Official)

ALICE Detector Status and Commissioning

Performance of muon and tau identification at ATLAS

COMPASS Drell-Yan. Michela Chiosso, University of Torino and INFN. TMD ECT* Workshop April 2016

PAMELA satellite: fragmentation in the instrument

arxiv: v2 [hep-ex] 12 Feb 2014

HARP a hadron production experiment. Emilio Radicioni, INFN for the HARP collaboration

A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge

Measurements and Simulations of Single-Event Upsets in a 28-nm FPGA. Hans Calén, Tord Johansson, Karoly Makónyi, Pawel Marciniewski

Future prospects for the measurement of direct photons at the LHC

Non-collision Background Monitoring Using the Semi-Conductor Tracker of ATLAS at LHC

The Alice Experiment Felix Freiherr von Lüdinghausen

The PANDA experiment: Antiproton physics at FAIR

Study of transverse momentum dependent distributions from polarised Drell-Yan at COMPASS

The Hadron Production Experiment at the PS, CERN

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS MUON TRIGGER IN RUN 2

Status / Hadron Spectroscopy at COMPASS

The Fast Interaction Trigger Upgrade for ALICE

High resolution spectroscopy of hypernuclei with γ-ray detectors

PoS(KAON13)012. R K Measurement with NA62 at CERN SPS. Giuseppe Ruggiero. CERN

Calibration and Performance of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter During the LHC Run 2

Neutral particles energy spectra for 900 GeV and 7 TeV p-p collisions, measured by the LHCf experiment

The SHiP experiment. Colloquia: IFAE A. Paoloni( ) on behalf of the SHiP Collaboration. 1. Introduction

Status and Performance of the ATLAS Experiment

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 2 Nov 2010

Hough Transform Based Pattern Recognition for the PANDA Forward Tracking System. Heinrich-Buff-Ring 16 Via P. Giuria, 1 D Gießen I Torino

Status of the physics validation studies using Geant4 in ATLAS

Status of ATLAS and Preparation for the Pb-Pb Run

READINESS OF THE CMS DETECTOR FOR FIRST DATA

The Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the HERA-B Experiment

High-energy Gamma Rays detection with the AMS-02 electromagnetic calorimeter. F. Pilo for the AMS-02 ECAL Group INFN Sezione di Pisa, Italy

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. Commissioning of the CMS Detector

ALICE A Large Ion Collider Experiment

PANDA. antiproton Annihilation at DArmstadt

COMPASS Measurements of Asymmetry Amplitudes in the Drell-Yan Process Observed from Scattering Pions off a Transversely Polarized Proton Target

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

The Barrel DIRC Detector for the PANDA Experiment at FAIR

Likelihood Methods for Beam Particle Identification at the COMPASS Experiment

The ALICE Experiment Introduction to relativistic heavy ion collisions

A beam line for schools

Physics with PANDA at FAIR

Particle Identification: Computer reconstruction of a UA1 event with an identified electron as a candidate for a W >eν event

A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINING CHARGE AND MOMENTUM OF ELECTRONS AND POSITRONS USING CALORIMETRY AND SILICON TRACKING. Qun Fan & Arie Bodek

Particle detection 1

New Limits on Heavy Neutrino from NA62

Particle Identification Algorithms for the Medium Energy ( GeV) MINERνA Test Beam Experiment

Current Status of Luminosity Measurement with the CMD-3 Detector at the VEPP-2000 e + e collider

Physics studies to define the CMS muon detector upgrade for High-Luminosity LHC

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)522. The status of MICE Step IV

First Run-2 results from ALICE

PoS(DIS 2010)190. Diboson production at CMS

D + analysis in pp collisions

The CBM experiment - a status report

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

Measurement of the baryon number transport with LHCb

Transcription:

PANDA Muon System Prototype Victor Abazov 1, Gennady Alexeev 1, Maxim Alexeev 2, Vladimir Frolov 1, Georgy Golovanov 1, Sergey Kutuzov 1, Alexei Piskun 1, Alexander Samartsev 1, Valeri Tokmenin 1, Alexander Verkheev 1,, Leonid Vertogradov 1, Nikolai Zhuravlev 1 1 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia 2 INFN Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy Abstract. The PANDA Experiment will be one of the key experiments at the Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) which is under construction now in the territory of the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt, Germany. PANDA is aimed to study hadron spectroscopy and various topics of the weak and strong forces. Muon System is chosen as the most suitable technology for detecting the muons. The Prototype of the PANDA Muon System is installed on the test beam line T9 at the Proton Synchrotron (PS) at CERN. Status of the PANDA Muon System prototype is presented with few preliminary results. 1 Introduction PANDA (antiproton ANnihilation at Darmstadt) experiment is one of the four major scientific pillars of FAIR and is dedicated to perform fundamental research with antiproton beam with the momentum between 1.5 GeV/c and 15 GeV/c interacting with a fixed target inside the PANDA detector. The purpose of this experiment is hadron spectroscopy with the search for exotic particles and nucleon structure measurements for studying in-media effects of hadronic particles or hypernuclei. The envisaged physics program of the PANDA experiment requires large acceptance, high resolution for tracking as well as excellent particle identification and calorimetry. To obtain good momentum resolution the PANDA setup is divided into two parts: the Target Spectrometer (TS) based on a superconducting solenoid magnet surrounding the interaction point and the Forward Spectrometer (FS) based on a conventional dipole magnet for detecting particles emitted at forward angles. Muons are an important probe for J/ψ identification, semi-leptonic D-meson decays and the Drell- Yan process. To measure muons within a wide momentum range, from hundreds MeV up to 1 GeV inside PANDA the Muon System [1] will be installed. The PANDA Muon System uses a Range System (RS) technique to register muons in a laminated iron absorber. Mini Drift Tubes (MDT) [2, 3] with two-coordinate readout of track information (the wires and the orthogonal strips) are used for charged particle detection in the RS. The resolution of Muon System is enough to use it as a coarse sampling hadron calorimeter. The Muon System consists of four parts: a Barrel (13 sensitive layers), an Endcap (5 layers), a Muon Filter (4 layers) and a Forward RS (16 layers). In the barrel part the granularity of the iron absorber is 3 cm (6 cm for the first and last layers) while in other parts of the e-mail: alver@jinr.ru The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4./).

Muon System 6 cm (for better detection/absorption of muons with higher momenta). The aim of the Muon System is to identify the primary muons with maximal possible separation from background contamination originating mostly from primary low-momenta pions and secondary decay muons. 2 Range System Prototype To test and optimise different aspects of the PANDA Range System performance based on MDTs with two-coordinate readout, a Range System prototype of the Muon System has been constructed at JINR (Dubna) and installed at CERN. The prototype was placed at the end of the secondary particles test beam line T9 at the Proton Synchrotron. It consists of steel absorber plates, detecting layers of MDTs, strip boards, corresponding front-end electronics for wire and strip readout, trigger and data acquisition system (DAQ), high-voltage and low-voltage supplies, and a gas system. The prototype is designed as 4 in 1 device: the structure of absorber plates reproduces the different parts of the Muon System mentioned above. The physical dimensions of the prototype are 22 x 15 x 17 cm 3. The weight of the prototype is about 1 tons. The total number of readout channels is about 4, i.e. 2 for wires and 2 for strips. The prototype has equal spatial granularity in both coordinates 1 cm given by the wire pitch of MDT and the strip width. The wires and strips are running perpendicular to each other. The information is read out by the trigger and the data acquisition system of the COMPASS (CERN) experiment [4] adapted for the PANDA Muon System prototype. The main tasks of the beam tests are: 1) study the system response to all types of particles in the full energy range of PANDA; 2) test the algorithms for muon-to-pion separation; 3) tune the Monte Carlo (MC) model parameters. 3 Modeling of Muon System Prototype It is important to have the model of the Muon System prototype in PandaRoot package [5] for full MC simulation of PANDA setup. Transfer of the detector geometry from Computer-Aided Design (CAD) systems to particle transports MC codes like GEANT4 [6] and ROOT [7] is always an issue due to possible geometry description incompatibility. To describe the geometry of the existing prototype of PANDA Muon System, its model was developed using CATIA-GDML geometry builder package [8]. The package allows exchanging of the CAD-geometry to GEANT4 or ROOT compatible code using Geometry Description Markup Language (GDML) [9]. The geometrical model of the prototype consists of four parts as well as the real setup (see Sec. 2). Each part comprises detector layers consisting of 8-12 MDTs, which are separated by the absorbers of varying thickness. Each MDT consists of 8 sensitive elements, aluminium profiles and plastic envelope. In total, it equals to 24 layers. The geometrical model of the prototype was transferred and integrated into PandaRoot framework. Different colors represent different parts of the PANDA Muon System, see Fig. 1. Also new program classes (MdtPrototype, MdtPoint etc.) have been developed and can be added into PandaRoot framework. 4 Experimental Data and Results The main goal of the tests is calibration of the prototype as a particle identification (PID) device - for further use of this information for the Muon System. At the energies above 2 GeV the identification of muons versus hadrons is rather simple: the muon is represented by a straight track, the hadron gives obvious sample of a shower. It is demonstrated in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b) for the full depth of the 2

Figure 1. The geometrical model of the prototype in PandaRoot framework with hits (wire cells) fired by 5 GeV/c muon. Different colors represent different parts of the Muon System. prototype. The patterns (muon and hadron) were readout from the early version of prototype when it was equipped with only one-dimensional (wire) readout. It is important to mention that since 217 we have equipped the prototype with the second coordinate (strip) readout system. Fig. 2(c) shows the muon track sample (6 GeV/c) for two-coordinate readout (wires and orthogonal stripes) obtained for the barrel structure of prototype. (a) (b) (c) Figure 2. (a) Muonic sample, (b) hadronic sample: 5 GeV/c with one-coordinate readout (wires only), one bar represents one fired MDT cell (1 cm); (c) two-coordinates readout (wires - left, strips - right) for 6 GeV/c muon momentum; the particles on the figures enter the prototype from top. The goal of 217 test beam runs was aimed to identify low energy particles (by measuring their time-of-flight (TOF) in a beam) and study the corresponding response in the prototype structure. Two test beam runs have been conducted in 217. The prototype was pre-tested on cosmic rays and then it was installed at the end (focus) of the T9/PS test beam line and experimental data were collected. Two scintillation counters of the TOF system have been mounted into the beam line (at the distance 26 m of each other) which allowed observing three timing peaks in a beam (electrons, muons and pions). Fig. 3 shows results of particles separation. The beam momentum was set up to GeV/c. Setting the selection criteria for the time-to-digital converter (used by DAQ system) channel numbers allow separating events to two different data samples (with µ and π-mesons) interesting for further analysis. The obtained data sets were processed, converted to a root format and analysed. At the same time MC simulation of events with muons and pions with the same momentum was performed using prototype geometrical model in the PandaRoot framework. FairBoxGenerator generator is used [5]. To study the prototype response to different particles and find the way to separate the signal muons from background pions at low energies the set of variables has been investigated. As an illustration, Figs. 4(a) and 4(b) show the normalized distributions of events containing muons (green line) and 3

Figure 3. Results of particle TOF separation (identification): three peaks correspond to electrons, muons and pions. pions (black triangles) as a function of the last number of triggered (fired) layer in the prototype in data and MC, respectively. Distributions in data and MC have a similar shape, although they are different in numerical terms. The experimental data permit us to make an initial / preliminary rough estimate of the pion-to-muon separation at low ( GeV) momentum. So, the overlap of the pionic and muonic spectra after layer # 7 (to keep high efficiency for muon registration, 93%) gives us 22% of pion contamination. Whereas for the MC model we have contamination of pions 27% at 99% of muon efficiency. We assume now that the observed difference is caused by the secondary muons present in the beam due to pion-to-muon decay, and we plan to discriminate them in further runs by direct measurement of incoming momenta at the final focus of the beam. The depth of particle penetration will be used for particle identification in the Muon System at low ( 1 GeV/c) momenta. Normalized Number of Events.6.3.1 data π-sample µ-sample Entries 4751 Mean 4.337 RMS 2.437 Entries 767 Mean 8.585 RMS 1.451 2 4 6 8 1 12 Layer number Normalized Number of Events.6.3.1 MC π-sample µ-sample Entries 9841 Mean 4.679 RMS 2.473 Entries 19827 Mean 9.2 RMS.634 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 Layer number (a) (b) Figure 4. Normalized distributions of events with muons (green line) and pions (black triangles) as a function of the last hitted layer in the prototype: (a) in data; (b) in MC. Some methodical tests have been also performed in 217 using muon samples with the momenta of 2.5 GeV/c. For instance, the efficiency of particle s registration by MDT as a function of applied high voltage and the input current threshold was obtained, see Fig. 5(a). The detection efficiency of muon by single MDT at the operating voltage and current threshold (225V and 1µA) is 92%, which corresponds to its geometrical efficiency. Fig. 5(b) shows the counting rate of MDT (normalized to trigger rate) as a function of the voltage and the current threshold. These two plots indicate rather good high voltage operational plateau of MDTs with the small threshold ( 1µA) of about 15 2 Volts. 4

Efficiency 1.9.8.7.6.3 Threshold = 1 µa Threshold = 2 µa.1 Threshold = 3 µa 25 21 215 22 225 23 235 24 (a) Voltage, V Counting rate.8.7.6.3.1 Layer 1, Threshold = 1 µa Layer 1, Threshold = 2 µa Layer 1, Threshold = 3 µa 19 2 21 22 23 24 Voltage, V Figure 5. (a) MDT efficiency and (b) MDT counting rate as a function of voltage and current thresholds. (b) 5 Summary The geometrical model of the PANDA Muon System Prototype is done and ready to be implemented into the PandaRoot package. It is used to perform MC simulations of events with muons and hadrons. Also in 217, two test beam runs were conducted at CERN for the PANDA Muon System prototype. It allowed making experimental tests and estimate the muon-to-pion separation in data and MC at low energy. The PANDA Muon System prototype will be modified for 218 test beam run. Authors would like to thank Dr. S. Belogurov and E. Ovcharenko - for help with modeling of the PANDA Muon System prototype, I. Konorov - for help and advising on DAQ system and V. Malyshev - for the participating in the beginning of the work. Authors are particularly grateful to L. Gatignon for the multiple and fruitful discussions of the beam features. The work is partially carried out with the financial support of FAIR-Russia Research Center. One of the authors (A. Verkheev) also would like to acknowledge support by JINR, grant for JINR Young Scientists and Specialists no. 17-21-1. References [1] PANDA Collaboration, TDR for the: PANDA Muon System http://www.fair-center.eu/fileadmin/fair/publications_exp/muon_tdr.pdf. [2] V. Abazov et al., Instrum. Exp. Tech. 53, 356-361 (21). [3] V. Abazov et al., Instrum. Exp. Tech. 53, 648-652 (21). [4] H. Fischer et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 49, 443-447 (22). [5] https://fairroot.gsi.de/. [6] S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A 56, 25-33 (23). [7] R. Brun and F. Rademakers, Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A 389 81-86 (1997). [8] S. Belogurov et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 513, 223 (214). [9] R. Chytracek et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 54, 2892-2896 (26). 5