Name: Final Exam EconS 527 (December 12 th, 2016)

Similar documents
GS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 W2005

Bertrand Model of Price Competition. Advanced Microeconomic Theory 1

Oligopoly Notes. Simona Montagnana

EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018

4. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition

Department of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. May 2009

1 Oligopoly: Bertrand Model

Final Examination with Answers: Economics 210A

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2016

Oligopoly. Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 Spring 2009

ECON 255 Introduction to Mathematical Economics

Consumer theory Topics in consumer theory. Microeconomics. Joana Pais. Fall Joana Pais

Econ 101A Problem Set 6 Solutions Due on Monday Dec. 9. No late Problem Sets accepted, sorry!

Oligopoly Theory. This might be revision in parts, but (if so) it is good stu to be reminded of...

EconS Sequential Competition

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6

GARP and Afriat s Theorem Production

Introductory Microeconomics

Advanced Microeconomics

Recitation 2-09/01/2017 (Solution)

Midterm Exam, Econ 210A, Fall 2008

Recitation #2 (August 31st, 2018)

Microeconomic Theory-I Washington State University Midterm Exam #1 - Answer key. Fall 2016

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012

Theory Field Examination Game Theory (209A) Jan Question 1 (duopoly games with imperfect information)

Industrial Organization

Advanced Microeconomics

Basics of Game Theory

Hicksian Demand and Expenditure Function Duality, Slutsky Equation

Industrial Organization Lecture 7: Product Differentiation

MATH 446/546 Homework 2: Due October 8th, 2014

Utility Maximization Problem

ANSWER KEY. University of California, Davis Date: June 22, 2015

Notes I Classical Demand Theory: Review of Important Concepts

ECON 186 Class Notes: Optimization Part 2

Microeconomics I Fall 2007 Prof. I. Hafalir

Moral Hazard: Part 1. April 9, 2018

PhD Qualifier Examination

Static Models of Oligopoly

Advanced Microeconomics

Answer Key: Problem Set 3

Dynamic stochastic game and macroeconomic equilibrium

Utility Maximization Problem. Advanced Microeconomic Theory 2

Competitive Equilibrium

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid May Microeconomics Grade

Partial derivatives, linear approximation and optimization

Entrance Examination for M. A. Economics, Series 01. Time. 3 hours Maximum marks. 100

Answer Key: Problem Set 1

Problem Set 5: Expenditure Minimization, Duality, and Welfare 1. Suppose you were given the following expenditure function: β (α

Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 2: Demand Theory

Econ 101A Midterm 1 Th 29 September 2004.

Econ 101A Midterm 2 Th 8 April 2009.

Classic Oligopoly Models: Bertrand and Cournot

EE290O / IEOR 290 Lecture 05

Economics 101 Lecture 5 - Firms and Production

Game theory lecture 4. September 24, 2012

Lecture 7. Simple Dynamic Games

Durable goods monopolist

EC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 2

Industrial Organization, Fall 2011: Midterm Exam Solutions and Comments Date: Wednesday October

4: Dynamic games. Concordia February 6, 2017

Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 1 / Reny, 32

Econ 201: Problem Set 3 Answers

Bayesian Games and Mechanism Design Definition of Bayes Equilibrium

Economics 3012 Strategic Behavior Andy McLennan October 20, 2006

October 16, 2018 Notes on Cournot. 1. Teaching Cournot Equilibrium

Week 5 Consumer Theory (Jehle and Reny, Ch.2)

Rice University. Answer Key to Mid-Semester Examination Fall ECON 501: Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Part A

1 + x 1/2. b) For what values of k is g a quasi-concave function? For what values of k is g a concave function? Explain your answers.

Microeconomics II Lecture 4: Incomplete Information Karl Wärneryd Stockholm School of Economics November 2016

Wireless Network Pricing Chapter 6: Oligopoly Pricing

Online Addendum for Dynamic Procurement, Quantity Discounts, and Supply Chain Efficiency

Welfare Analysis in Partial Equilibrium.

Bayesian Nash equilibrium

Lecture 1. History of general equilibrium theory

Oligopoly. Firm s Profit Maximization Firm i s profit maximization problem: Static oligopoly model with n firms producing homogenous product.

Marginal Revenue Competitive Equilibrium Comparative Statics Quantity Tax. Equilibrium (Chapter 16)

Game Theory and Algorithms Lecture 2: Nash Equilibria and Examples

Question 1. (p p) (x(p, w ) x(p, w)) 0. with strict inequality if x(p, w) x(p, w ).

Monopolistic Competition when Income Matters

5. Externalities and Public Goods. Externalities. Public Goods types. Public Goods

Choice under Uncertainty

Microeconomic Theory -1- Introduction

5. Externalities and Public Goods

Homework #6 (10/18/2017)

University of Warwick, Department of Economics Spring Final Exam. Answer TWO questions. All questions carry equal weight. Time allowed 2 hours.

ANSWER KEY 2 GAME THEORY, ECON 395

Cournot Competition Under Asymmetric Information

Economics th April 2011

Structural Properties of Utility Functions Walrasian Demand

Economics 401 Sample questions 2

Game Theory Review Questions

Lecture Notes for Chapter 12

Econ 58 Gary Smith Spring Final Exam Answers

EC487 Advanced Microeconomics, Part I: Lecture 5

Econ 5150: Applied Econometrics Empirical Demand Analysis. Sung Y. Park CUHK

Maximum Value Functions and the Envelope Theorem

Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 6: Partial and General Equilibrium

General Equilibrium and Welfare

Week 10: Theory of the Firm (Jehle and Reny, Chapter 3)

Transcription:

Name: Final Exam EconS 527 (December 12 th, 2016) Question #1 [20 Points]. Consider the car industry in which there are only two firms operating in the market, Trotro (T) and Fido (F). The marginal production cost is c>0 and the inverse demand structure for the two products is: p T = a βq T γq F and p F = a γq T βq F where β >0 and β 2 > γ 2 a. Discuss how a value of β>0 and γ=0 affects the demand structure. Provide some intuition. b. Calculate and draw the best response functions for quantity competition in differentiated products. c. Solve the Cournot game with differentiated product. Make sure you solve for the output level of each firm, market price and profits. Discuss how profits are affected by an increase on γ. d. Compare your results (profits and output levels) with the case in which firms sequentially decide their output level (Stackelberg game). Assume that leader firm is Trotro. Solution a. When β>0 and γ=0 these two products are highly differentiated, so a change in the price of Fido will have a negligible effect for Trotro. b. Trotro solves the following maximization problem: Hence the first order condition with respect to q H is: Max qt π T = (a βq T γq F ) q T cq T Solving for q H, we obtain Trotro s best-response function: By symmetry, Fido s best-response function is: π T q T = a bq T γq F c = 0 R T (q F ) = q T = a γq F c (A) R F (q T ) = q F = a γq T c (B) q T a-c/γ R F(q T) a-c/ R T(q F) a-c/ a-c/γ q F c. Substituting (B) into (A),

a c q T = γ a γq H c / 4β 2 4β 2 q T = (a c) γa + γ 2 q T + γc/ γ 2 q T 4β 2 q T γ 2 q T = (a c) γ(a c) Solving for qh, q T = ( γ)(a c) 4β 2 γ 2 And by symmetry, q F = ( γ)(a c) 4β 2 γ 2 Substituting the above quantities into the demand functions, Profits, p T = p F = a β π T = π F = (a β ( γ)(a c) ( γ)(a c) 4β 2 γ 2 γ 4β 2 γ 2 = a ( γ)(a c) 4β 2 γ 2 [β γ] ( γ)(a c) ( γ)(a c) ( γ)(a c) 4β 2 γ 2 γ 4β 2 γ 2 ) 4β 2 γ 2 Hence when γ increases firms profits decreases d. Operating by backward induction, Fido maximizes the following profit function Max π F = (a γq T βq F ) q F cq F Hence the first order condition with respect to q V is: Solving for q V, we obtain Valley s best response function: π F q F = a q F γq T c = 0 R F (q T ) = q F = a c γq H In the first stage, Trotro maximizes its profits considering Fido s BRF (I) Max π T = (a βq T γ ( a c γq H )) q T cq T Hence the first order condition with respect to q T is: Solving for q T, π T a c = a q q T γ T + γ2 q T β = 0 4β 2 q T 2γ 2 q T = 2aβ γ(a c)

q T = 2aβ γ(a c) (II) 2( 2 γ 2 ) Substituting II into I we obtain, q F = 2aβ γ(a c) a c γ[ 2( 2 γ 2 ) ] First, note that q T > q F in a sequential move game, second, comparing the results in part (d) with those in part (c) we obtain that Trotro will produce a higher output under the Stackelberg competition than Cournot. In the case of Fido, the firm will produce a higher output level under Cournot than Stackelberg competition. Question #2 [15 Points]. Consider the following Cobb-Douglas utility function u(x, y) = x 2 y Identify the Walrasian and Hicksian demands for goods x and y, that is, x(p, w) and h(p, u), respectively. In addition, using the Roy's Identity demonstrate that your result x(p, w) is correct. Solution In order to find the Walrasian demand, let us solve the UMP max x 2 y applying the Lagrangian we obtain, taking F.O.C s.t. x + p yy= w Γ = x 2 y λ( x + p y y w) x = 2xy λ = 0 (1) y = x2 λp y = 0 (2) λ = x + p y y w = 0 (3) Hence, from (1) and (2) we have that, x = 2 p y y, hence substituting it into (3) we obtain 2 p y y + p y y w = 0 y = w 3p y Therefore, the walrasian demands are x x (p, w) = 2w 3 and x y (p, w) = w 3p y In order to obtain the Hicksian demand, we need to solve the EMP min x + p y y s.t. x 2 y u applying the lagrangian we obtain Γ = x + p y y μ(x 2 y u)

taking F.O.C x = 2μxy = 0 (4) y = p y μx 2 = 0 (5) λ = x2 y u = 0 (6) Hence, from (4) and (5) we have that x = 2 p y y, hence substituting it into (6) we obtain Therefore the hicksian demands are Finally, using the Roy s Identity we know that y = u1/3 2/3 4 1/3 ( ) p y h x (p, u) = 2 1/3 u 1/3 ( p y ) 1/3 and h y (p, u) = u1/3 4 1/3 ( 2/3 ) p y Hence, we first need to identify the indirect utility function, v(p,w). Substituting, xx(p,w) and xy(p,w) into u(x,y) we obtain v(p, w) = ( 2w 2 ) ( w ) = 4w3 3 3p y 27p 2 x p y Hence, v(p, w) = 8w3 27p 3 x p y v(p, w) w = 12w2 27p 2 x p y And 8w3 27p 3 x p y 12w 2 = 27p 2 x p y 2w 3 = x x (p, w) Question #3 [20 Points]. Let us examine the Market for Lemons model discussed the last week of class. Consider that the owner of the good used car must sell her car because she is leaving the country. In addition, assume that the market price of used and new cars are exogenously given by p U = UG 4, and p N = N G, respectively. Analyze the problem of the buyers, the problem of the lemon used-car seller and the 4 problem of the good used-car seller and show that nobody buys a used car. Clearly identify your assumptions and discuss the results. Solution Under these prices, we seek to characterize the demand and supply patterns of our agents. New buyers (who do not yet own a car): Recalling our assumption that NL = UL = 0 and N G > U G > 0, if a new buyer buys a new car, then his or her expected utility is Vb = 0.5N G + - p N = 0.25N G. In contrast, if a new buyer 0:5NL buys a used car then Vb = 0.5U G +0.5U L -p U = 0.25U G : Hence, under the assumed prices, new buyers buy new cars.

Good-used-car sellers: The question simply assumes that good-used-car owners must leave the country and therefore sell their good-used cars. Lemon-used-car sellers: If a lemon-used-car seller sells his or her lemon and buys a new car, then Vs;L = 0.5N G - p N + p U = 0.25N G + 0.25U G. In contrast, if she or he buys a used car then Vs;L= 0.5U G - p U + p U = 0.5U G. By assumption N G > U G, and 0.25N G + 0.25U G > 0.5U G, since 0.25N G >0.25U G. Hence, lemon-used-car sellers buy (and sell) new cars. Altogether, under the assumed prices, nobody buys a used car. Question #4 [15 Points]. Assume that the market for Green Tea is composed by two leading firms: Asian (Brand A) and Lupita (Brand L). The direct demand functions facing each producer are given by q A (p A, p B ) = 100 2p A + p B and q B (p A, p B ) = 60 2p B + p A Note: The demand functions are not symmetric (i.e., they have different intercepts). Assume zero production cost (c A = c B = 0) and solve the following problems: (a) Suppose that the two firms merge. However, they decide to keep selling the two brands separately and charge, possibly, different prices. Compute the prices p A and p B which maximize joint industry profit and the aggregate industry profit. Question #5 [10 Points]. Define and discuss the Independence Axiom (IA). Provide an example in which the IA is NOT violated. Definition: A preference relation satisfies I.A. if, for any three lotteries, L, L and L, and α (0,1) we have L L if and only if α L+(1- α )L α L +(1- α)l. Question #6 [20 Points]. The certainty equivalent of a lottery is the amount of money you would have to be given with certainty to be just as well-off with that lottery. Suppose that your von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function over lotteries that give you an amount x if Event 1 happens and y if Event 1 does not happen is U(x, y, π) = π x + (1 π) y where π is the probability that Event 1 happens and 1 π is the probability that Event 1 does not happen. a. If π = 0.5, calculate the utility of a lottery that gives you $10,000 if Event 1 happens and $100 if Event 1 does not happen. b. If you were sure to receive $4,900, what would your utility be? c. Given this utility function and π =.5, write a general formula for the certainty equivalent of a lottery that gives you $x if Event 1 happens and $y if Event 1 does not happen. d. Calculate the certainty equivalent of receiving $10,000 if Event 1 happens and $100 if Event 1 does not happen.

Solution a). 5 10,000 + 5 100 =.5 100 +.5 10 = 55 b) If you were sure to receive $4,900, then you receive $4,900 in both events. π 4,900 + (1 π) 4,900 = 70, where π can be any probability. c) (.5x 1 2 +.5y 1 2) 2 d) Using the equation in part c) (.5x 1 2 +.5y 1 2) 2 = (.5(10,000) 1 2 +.5(100) 1 2) 2 = 3,025