Towards The. Design of Super Columns. Prof. AbdulQader Najmi

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

Appendix G Analytical Studies of Columns

Steel Cross Sections. Structural Steel Design

CIV 207 Winter For practice

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

MECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 3

4.3 Moment Magnification

Local Buckling. Local Buckling in Columns. Buckling is not to be viewed only as failure of the entire member

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

It s a bird it s a plane it s Super Table! F y = 50 ksi F u = 65 ksi ASD LRFD ASD LRFD

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Introduction to Structural Member Properties

Critical Load columns buckling critical load

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

Stress Analysis Lecture 3 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced concrete columns when the ACI code is selected.

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Sample Problem 4.2

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:

CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS)

Durability of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Filled Steel Tubes under Eccentric Loads

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.

2010 NASCC / Structures Congress Orlando, Florida May 13, 2010

k 21 k 22 k 23 k 24 k 31 k 32 k 33 k 34 k 41 k 42 k 43 k 44

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

Serviceability Deflection calculation

[5] Stress and Strain

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 3 Torsion

= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

Hardened Concrete. Lecture No. 16

Mechanical Properties of Materials

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

CHAPTER 3 THE EFFECTS OF FORCES ON MATERIALS

MATERIALS FOR CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 2 Stress & Strain - Axial Loading

Role of Force Resultant Interaction on Ultra-High Performance Concrete

Conceptual question Conceptual question 12.2

NYIT Instructors: Alfred Sanabria and Rodrigo Suarez

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6

Chapter 9: Column Analysis and Design

Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections

Automatic Scheme for Inelastic Column Buckling

Engineering Science OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS

FLEXURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN METHODS FOR SRC BEAM SECTIONS WITH COMPLETE COMPOSITE ACTION

Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel

Mechanics of Solids. Mechanics Of Solids. Suraj kr. Ray Department of Civil Engineering

Description of geometric nonlinearity for beamcolumn analysis in OpenSees

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

December 10, PROBLEM NO points max.

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties

Nonlinear Analysis of Axially Loaded Concrete-Filled Tube Columns with Confinement Effect

Solid Mechanics Homework Answers

999 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD ORANGE, CALIFORNIA TITLE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS EXAMPLE BY R. MATTHEWS DATE 5/21/01

THROUGH PLATE-TO-ROUND HSS CONNECTIONS

of I Section Members

NOVEL FLOWCHART TO COMPUTE MOMENT MAGNIFICATION FOR LONG R/C COLUMNS

7.5 Elastic Buckling Columns and Buckling

SHEAR LAG IN SLOTTED-END HSS WELDED CONNECTIONS

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

CHAPTER II EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

SIMPLIFIED MODELING OF THIN-WALLED TUBES WITH OCTAGONAL CROSS SECTION AXIAL CRUSHING. Authors and Correspondance: Abstract:

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS

Question 1. Ignore bottom surface. Solution: Design variables: X = (R, H) Objective function: maximize volume, πr 2 H OR Minimize, f(x) = πr 2 H

Experimental Investigation of Steel Pipe Pile to Concrete Cap Connections

9.5 Compression Members

RODS: THERMAL STRESS AND STRESS CONCENTRATION

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES

EFFECT OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT ON FAILURE MODE OF RC BRIDGE PIERS SUBJECTED TO STRONG EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS

The Local Web Buckling Strength of Coped Steel I-Beam. ABSTRACT : When a beam flange is coped to allow clearance at the

FCP Short Course. Ductile and Brittle Fracture. Stephen D. Downing. Mechanical Science and Engineering

1.8 Unconfined Compression Test

TRANSVERSE PLATE-TO-SQUARE/RECTANGULAR HSS CONNECTIONS

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams

DESIGN GUIDES FOR HIGH STRENGTH STRUCTURAL HOLLOW SECTIONS MANUFACTURED BY SSAB - FOR EN 1090 APPLICATIONS

The science of elasticity

MIL-HDBK-5H 1 December 1998

ME 354, MECHANICS OF MATERIALS LABORATORY COMPRESSION AND BUCKLING

DETERMINATION OF DUCTILITY CAPACITY AND OTHER SECTION PROPERTIES OF T-SHAPED RC WALLS IN DIRECT DISPLACEMENT-BASED DESIGN

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST

(Round up to the nearest inch.)

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF LARGE RC CIRCULAR HOLLOW COLUMNS

Transcription:

Towards The Design of Super Columns Prof. AbdulQader Najmi

Description: Tubular Column Square or Round Filled with Concrete Provided with U-Links welded to its Walls as shown in Figure 1

Compression Specimen U-Links are used to Confine Concrete

What is a Super Column? Large Forces Sustains Large Axial Strains Has A Unique Type of Failure

Super Column Failure: By Plastic Buckling of the steel Tube. Not by the Crushing of Concrete. Concrete does not fail In fact: Concrete deforms inside the buckled tube shape depicting its exact inside shape with no signs of cracking!!!

3 Million pounds Apparatus Newmark Lab - University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Author among professors from Civil and Mechanical Engineering Departments.

Test Specimen fitted with all sorts of measuring devices

Concrete reshaped No signs of cracks

Summary of Test Results Square Specimens Circular Rectangular Specimens Group-1 Circular Specimens Specimens group-4 Group- Group-3 Specimen C1- C1- C1- cc- cc- cc- cc- CC CC- REC- REC REC- 000 040 030 000 040 030 00-000 00 000-045 035 Spacing of - 40 30-40 30 0-0 - 45 35 U-Links (mm) Ultimate 1104 1568 160 130 1693 1744 1947 70 390 1900 80 306 Load (kn) f m a x. f c 0.85 1.73 1.83 0.86 1.87 1.98.43 0.78 1.77 0.85 1.58 1.63 f c = 30 MPa f c = 3.7 MPa f c = 7.1 MPa f c = 3.4 MPa A 1 7 5 4 0 m m A 1 9 6 5 m m c c c c A 3 7 8 4 0 m m A 0 m m f f y (shell) =30 MPa (shell) = 355 MPa y f (shell) = 454 y y f (shell) = 367 MPa Dia. of U-link = 8 mm Dia. of U-link = 8 mm MPa Dia. of U-link = 10 mm f (link) = 335 MPa f Dia. of U-link = (link) = 335 MPa y y y 10mm f (link) = 486 MPa f y (link) = 486 MPa Summary of the results.

Test Results at Newmark Laboratories Control Specimen 1 kips # (Control) tra ns verse strain average axial strain Strain, concrete a xial s train average overall s train Imbedment Avg rebar Avg axial Avg trans Avg overall 1 kips Fig. 14 : Load Axial Strain Steel Tube, Axial strain of concrete (imbedment), Transverse strain of tube, Average overall strain of specimen (Control Specimen) Applied load, P (kips)

Stra 3/8 U-Links 50 kips ----5.1 ksi added =0% #3 (3/8" rebar) ave rage transverse s rtain average axial stra in embedment s train in, Imbedment average overall s train 147 kips Avg rebar Avg axial Avg trans Avg overall Fig. 15: Lo a d a verage tra nsverse strain, a verage axial strain (tu be), e mbe dment strain (concrete), a verage overall strain Applied load, P (kips)

½ U-Links 81 kips ----5.7 ksi added =3% #4 (1/" rebar) Strain, Imbedment Avg rebar Avg axial Avg trans Avg overall 1503 kips Applied load, P (kips)

5/8 U-Links 360 kips ---- 7.3 ksi added =30% #5 (5/8" rebar) Strain, Imbedment Avg rebar Avg axial Avg trans Avg overall 158 kips Applied load, P (kips)

Filled Composite Rectangular AISC Specifications Columns P P F A 0.85f A no p y s c c P P 0.75 u c n c P P P p P y no p p r p p b / t.6 E F y r b / t 3.00 E F y b / t 5.00 E F y P F A 0.7f A y y s c c P no.5 P F A 0.7f A y cr s c c P e F 9E s b t cr P u P no 0.75P no 0.658 Pe P u 0.75 0.877P e EI eff. E s I s C 3 E c I c A s C 3 0.6 0.9 A c A s E w 1.5 c c f c P EI ef f. e KL

Where: P u 0.75P no 0.658 Pe P no A c c (1) P P F A 0.85f () no p y s EI ef f. P (3) e KL EI eff. E s I s C 3 E c I c C 3 0.6 A A s 0.9 A c s P no P e A c E c EI eff E s F y I s K L f c w c C 3 P p A s c nominal strength elastic buckling load area of concrete modulus of elasticity of concrete effective stiffness of composite section modulus of elasticity of steel minimum yield sress of steel moment of inertia of steel shape effective length factor laterally unbraced length concrete grade weight of concrete per unit volume coefficient related to filled composite compression member P no for compact sections area of steel shape 0.75

AISC Code Calculations AISC Eqn. 1-9b HSS 8 8 1 / L eff. 1.7 t 0.93 1 0.465" des. s ft p b / t.6 no p y s c c f c B t des B i E s F y F 7.84 8 0.465 7.07 9000 46 E y A c I c 49.98 08.1 P no A 13.5 56.75 P in EI eff. e P e b / t 14. P P F A 0.85f K L A 0.009 I 15 in 4 E c w 1.5 f c Compact section AISC Equation I-9b Page 16.1-87 10889.9 954.10 P no P Pe n P no 0.658 5144 950.6 Effective Stiffness EI eff. E s I s C 3 E c I c A C 3 0.6 s A A 0.9 c s f c Unconfined C 3 1.55 0.900 Newmark Lab -Illnois 158 EI eff. 4588904 1503 147 #3 U Link 3/8 inches spacing 1.5 inches added 50 kips 7.84 1.00 1 1.0

F y y E s 1 E s 1 1st secant modulus of steel (E steel ) f c f " enhanced stress attained of concrete f c n E s 1 E E s c c s nd secant modulus of steel at n y f E c nd secant modulus of concrete at n y n A T F y n E s 1, E s 1, A E N F f A n E c A E I c A s 1 A... (steel units), A... (steel units), P s T ct s n L N n A E T A ct A s (steel units) s A T I (b t ) (b t ) L I s...(steel units), I ct 3 s...(steel units) n N 1 r T s s y c c I (b t ) 4 I s T...(steel units) n 1N A (b t ) A s T...(steel units) n N r T I T...(steel units) A T

Non-Linear Transformation Calculations Applies to: Linear, plastic and Strain Hardening Stages U 3 8 f c f c HSS 8 8 1/ s f c E 75 387 46 9000 13.5 8 0.465 50.0 0.5 cs I s A s s 1 A T I T r A N y cs 1.17 7.84 143 E b t 15 0.18 T N E ct I 0.0016 0.43.69.51 0.5 s 1 0.60 E 3 s 1 1.67 I nf T b t 4 I s b t (b y (E s 1 ) I T t ) n N 1 P P n 9.11 n L I cs 1 1N A b t E 147 147 s s 1 A L r T.89 147 1.03 T n N nf y HSS 8 n E s 1 E s F y E s 1 A s 1 b t A c A cs 1 f c E cs L (ft) 1.91 n y E P n A F s y f c A c Beams: Coumns: P n A T l n y n [ y F y E s 1 E s constant ]

Multi-Cell Column Cross-sections Four Cell Cross-Section Four Cell Cr oss-section Three Cell Cross-Section Figure :9 Suggested Layouts of the multi-cell Columns Five Cell Cross-Section Two Cell Cross-Section

CONCLUSION The strength of a compression cell is linked to the U-Links provided, the use of square tubes ensures a uniform confinement of concrete. The ultimate strains attained in the compression cells together with the large inertia properties of multi-cell cross-sections results in high design moments close to plastic moments when considering large unsupported lengths. The failure of such columns will tend to be linked to plastic buckling of steel tubes rather than of crushing in concrete.