LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS. Contents 1. Symplectic toric manifolds 1 2. Delzant s theorem 4 3. Symplectic cut 8

Similar documents
Delzant s Garden. A one-hour tour to symplectic toric geometry

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

Hamiltonian Toric Manifolds

LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM

Geometry and Dynamics of singular symplectic manifolds. Session 9: Some applications of the path method in b-symplectic geometry

ON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS

Monomial equivariant embeddings of quasitoric manifolds and the problem of existence of invariant almost complex structures.

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

Reduced phase space and toric variety coordinatizations of Delzant spaces

LECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES

LECTURE 4: SYMPLECTIC GROUP ACTIONS

Complex structures on 4-manifolds with symplectic 2-torus actions

A Convexity Theorem and Reduced Delzant Spaces

LECTURE 8: THE MOMENT MAP

LECTURE 6: J-HOLOMORPHIC CURVES AND APPLICATIONS

New constructions of Hamiltonian-minimal Lagrangian submanifolds

A DANILOV-TYPE FORMULA FOR TORIC ORIGAMI MANIFOLDS VIA LOCALIZATION OF INDEX

Symplectic Geometry Through Polytopes

Topology of symplectic torus actions with symplectic orbits

Research Article Symplectic Toric Geometry and the Regular Dodecahedron

arxiv: v4 [math.sg] 22 Jul 2015

arxiv: v1 [math.sg] 26 Jan 2015

A LITTLE TASTE OF SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: THE SCHUR-HORN THEOREM CONTENTS

A. CANNAS DA SILVA, V. GUILLEMIN, AND A. R. PIRES

Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics

arxiv: v2 [math.at] 18 Mar 2012

ON THE DENSITY FUNCTION ON MODULI SPACES OF TORIC 4-MANIFOLDS

7.3 Singular Homology Groups

Log-Concavity and Symplectic Flows

Higher codimension CR structures, Levi-Kähler reduction and toric geometry

A Note on Toric Contact Geometry

LECTURE 11: TRANSVERSALITY

Convex Symplectic Manifolds

Symplectic Reduction and Convexity of Moment Maps. Theo van den Hurk

Stratified Symplectic Spaces and Reduction

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

A little taste of symplectic geometry

arxiv: v1 [math.sg] 6 Nov 2015

Cohomology of the Mumford Quotient

Math 530 Lecture Notes. Xi Chen

LECTURE 1: LINEAR SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

Res + X F F + is defined below in (1.3). According to [Je-Ki2, Definition 3.3 and Proposition 3.4], the value of Res + X

arxiv: v2 [math.sg] 13 Feb 2008

Torus actions and Ricci-flat metrics

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE

LOCALIZATION AND SPECIALIZATION FOR HAMILTONIAN TORUS ACTIONS. Contents

Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds

CLASSIFICATION OF TORIC MANIFOLDS OVER AN n-cube WITH ONE VERTEX CUT

Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions

The rational cohomology of real quasi-toric manifolds

Symplectic Origami. A. Cannas da Silva 1,2, V. Guillemin 3, and A. R. Pires 3

Smith theory. Andrew Putman. Abstract

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS

arxiv: v4 [math.sg] 24 Jul 2011

10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces.

HAMILTONIAN TORUS ACTIONS IN EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY AND SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

M4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1

Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

Cohomological rigidity of 6-dimensional quasitoric manifolds

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

The Based Loop Group of SU(2) Lisa Jeffrey. Department of Mathematics University of Toronto. Joint work with Megumi Harada and Paul Selick

Crash Course on Toric Geometry

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

Notes for Functional Analysis

THE SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY OF PENROSE RHOMBUS TILINGS. Fiammetta Battaglia and Elisa Prato

Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order

Demushkin s Theorem in Codimension One

LECTURE 14: LIE GROUP ACTIONS

HAMILTONIAN ACTIONS IN GENERALIZED COMPLEX GEOMETRY

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 14 May 2001

Toric Varieties and the Secondary Fan

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

A PERSONAL TOUR THROUGH SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY AND GEOMETRY

Lecture III: Neighbourhoods

LECTURE 2: SYMPLECTIC VECTOR BUNDLES

Nicholas Proudfoot Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403

An Invitation to Geometric Quantization

BRST 2006 (jmf) 7. g X (M) X ξ X. X η = [ξ X,η]. (X θ)(η) := X θ(η) θ(x η) = ξ X θ(η) θ([ξ X,η]).

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP

NilBott Tower of Aspherical Manifolds and Torus Actions

LECTURE 9: THE WHITNEY EMBEDDING THEOREM

IGA Lecture I: Introduction to G-valued moment maps

Stable complex and Spin c -structures

We have the following immediate corollary. 1

Subgroups of Lie groups. Definition 0.7. A Lie subgroup of a Lie group G is a subgroup which is also a submanifold.

Comparison of the Weyl integration formula and the equivariant localization formula for a maximal torus of Sp(1)

12 Geometric quantization

The Atiyah bundle and connections on a principal bundle

arxiv: v3 [math.sg] 12 Jan 2017

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

arxiv: v3 [math.sg] 17 Jan 2012

Geometry of the momentum map

DISCRETE SUBGROUPS, LATTICES, AND UNITS.

From action-angle coordinates to geometric quantization: a 30-minute round-trip. Eva Miranda

Transcription:

LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS Contents 1. Symplectic toric manifolds 1 2. Delzant s theorem 4 3. Symplectic cut 8 1. Symplectic toric manifolds Orbit of torus actions. Recall that in lecture 9 we showed ker(dµ m ) = (T m (G m)) ωm. Proposition 1.1. Let (M, ω, T k, µ) be a compact connected Hamiltonian T k -space, then for any m M, then orbit T k m is an isotropic submanifold of M. Proof. The moment map µ is T k -invariant, so on the orbit T k m, µ takes a constant value ξ t. It follows that the differential dµ m : T m M T ξ t t maps the subspace T m (T k m) to 0. In other words, T m (T k m) ker(dµ m ) = (T m (T k m)) ωm. So T k m is an isotropic submanifold of M. Effective torus actions. Definition 1.2. An action of a Lie group G on a smooth manifold M is called effective (or faithful) if each group element g e moves at least one point m M, i.e. G m = {e}. m M (Equivalently, if the group homomorphism τ : G Diff(M) is injective.) Remark. If a group action τ of G on M is not effective, then ker(τ) is a normal subgroup of G, and the action τ induces a smooth action of G/ker(τ) on M which is effective. A remarkable fact on effective T k -action is 1

2 LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS Theorem 1.3. Suppose T k acts on M effectively. Then the set of points where the action is free, M = {m M G m = {e}}, is an open and dense subset in M. For a proof, c.f. Guillemin-Ginzburg-Karshon, Moment Maps, Cobordisms, and Hamiltonian Group Actions, appendix B, corollary B.48. An important consequence is Corollary 1.4. Let (M, ω, T k, µ) be a compact connected Hamiltonian T k -space, If the T k -action is effective, then dim M 2k. Proof. Pick any point m in M where the T k -action is free, i.e. (T k ) m = {e}. Then the orbit T k m is diffeomorphic to T k /(T k ) m = T k, and thus has dimension k. But we have just seen that T k m is an isotropic submanifold of M. So Symplectic Toric manifolds. k = dim(t k m) 1 dim M. 2 Definition 1.5. A compact connected symplectic manifold (M, ω) of dimension 2n is called a symplectic toric manifold is it is equipped with an effective Hamiltonian T n -action. Example. C n admits an effective Hamiltonian T n action, and thus is a symplectic toric manifold. (t 1,, t n ) (z 1,, z n ) = (t 1 z 1,, z n t n ), Example. CP n admits an effective Hamiltonian T n action, (t 1,, t n ) [z 0 : z 1 : : z n ] = [z 0 : t 1 z 1 : : t n z n ] and thus is a symplectic toric manifold. The image of the moment map is the simplex in R n with n + 1 vertices 1e 2 i and (0,, 0), where e i = (0,, 1,, 0). Example. The products of toric manifolds is still toric. Remark. A symplectic toric manifold is a special complete integrable system because for any X, Y t, {µ X, µ Y }(m) = ω m (X M (m), Y M (m)) = 0.

LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS 3 Delzant polytopes. According to the Atiyah-Guillemin-Sternberg convexity theorem, the image of the moment map is always a convex polytope in R n. The moment polytope of CP 1, CP 2 and CP 1 CP 1 are S 2 CP 2 CP 1 CP 1 Definition 1.6. A polytope R n is called a Delzant polytope if (1) (simplicity) there are n edges meeting at every vertex p. (2) (rationality) the edges meeting at p are of the form p + tu i, with u i Z n. (3) (smoothness) at each p, u 1,, u n form a Z-basis of Z n. Obviously the previous examples are Delzant polytopes. Delzant polytopes More examples of (0,1) (1,1) (0,0) (4,0) (0,0,1) (0,1,0) (0,0,0) (1,0,0) The following polytopes are not Delzant: (0,2) (2,2) (0,0) (3,0) (0,0,1) (0,1,0) (1,1,0) (0,0,0) (1,0,0) Remark. Suppose a Delzant polytope has d faces. Let v i, 1 i d, be the primitive outward-pointing normal vectors to the faces of, then can be described via a set of inequalities x, v i λ i, i = 1,, d Moment polytopes are Delzant. Now we are ready to prove Theorem 1.7. For any symplectic toric manifold (M, ω), its moment polytope is a Delzant polytope.

4 LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS Proof. Let m M be a fixed point of the Hamiltonian torus action, then p = µ(m) is a vertex of the moment polytope. We have seen from the proof of the Atiyah- Guillemin-Sternberg convexity theorem that the moment polytope near p is n {p + s i w i s i 0} i=1 where w 1,, w n are the weights of the linearized isotropic action of the torus on T m M. Thus satisfies the conditions (1) and (2). Suppose does not satisfy the condition (3). Let W be the Z-matrix whose row vectors are the vectors w i s. Then W is not invertible as a Z-matrix. We take a vector τ Z n such that W τ Z n. (If W is not invertible, we can take τ be any non-integer vector in the kernel of W. If W is invertible as an R-matrix but not invertible as a Z-matrix, then W 1 can not map all Z-vectors to Z vectors ). So we have w i, τ Z for all i. Recall that in a neighborhood of m, there exists coordinate system (z 1,, z n ) so that the action of T n is given by exp(x) (z 1,, z n ) = (e 2πi w 1,X z 1,, e 2πi wn,x z n ). So exp(τ) acts trivially on a neighborhood of m, but exp(τ) is not the identity element in T n. This contradicts with the fact that in a dense open subset of M the action is free. So satisfies (3). 2. Delzant s theorem Statement of main theorem. The main result is the following classification for symplectic toric manifold, which says that symplectic toric manifolds are characterized by their moment polytopes: Theorem 2.1 (Delzant, 1990). There is a one-to-one correspondence between symplectic toric manifolds (up to T n equivariant symplectomorphisms) and Delzant polytopes. More precisely, (1) The moment polytope of a toric manifold is a Delzant polytope. (2) Every Delzant polytope is the moment polytope of a symplectic toric manifold. (3) Two toric manifolds with the same moment polytope are equivariantly symplectomorphic. The proof is divided into several steps: Step 1: M toric = µ(m) Delzant. (Done as theorem 1.7.) Step 2: Delzant construct compact connected symplectic manifold M.

LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS 5 Step 3: Check M is toric and µ(m ) =. Step 4: (M 1 ) = (M 2 ) M 1 M 2. Construction of M from Delzant polytope. Now let be a Delzant polytope in R n. Suppose has d facets, then by the algebraic description one can find primitive outward pointing vectors v 1,, v d so that = {x (R n ) x, v i λ i, i = 1,, d}. By translation we may assume 0, and thus λ i 0 for all i. We shall construct M as the symplectic quotient of R d by a Hamiltonian action of a torus N of dimension d n. Step 2.a The (d n)-torus N. Let e 1,, e d be the standard basis of R d. Define linear map π : R d R n, e i v i Then since is Delzant, π is onto and maps Z d onto Z n. So we get an induced surjective Lie group homomorphism π : T d = R d /Z d T n = R n /Z n. Let N = ker(π). It is a (d n)-subtorus of T d. Note that from the exact sequence of Lie group homomorphisms 0 N i T d π T n 0 one gets an exact sequence of Lie algebras 0 n i R d π R n 0, and thus an exact sequence of dual Lie algebras 0 (R n ) π (R d ) i n 0. Step 2.b The Hamiltonian N-action on C d. The standard T d -action on C d is given by (e iθ 1,, e iθ d ) (z 1,, z d ) = (e iθ 1 z 1,, e iθ d z d ). The action is Hamiltonian with moment map φ : C d (R d ), φ(z 1,, z d ) = 1 2 ( z 1 2,, z d 2 ) + c. We choose c = λ = (λ 1,, λ d ). Since N is a sub-torus of T d, the induced N-action on C d is Hamiltonian with moment map ι φ : C d n. Step 2.c The zero level set Z = (ι φ) 1 (0) is compact. Let = π ( ). Then is compact. We claim

6 LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS Claim I: Im(π ) Im(φ) =. According to this claim, Z = (i φ) 1 (0) = φ 1 (ker(i )) = φ 1 (Im(π )) = φ 1 ( ). So Z is compact since the map φ proper. Proof of claim I:. Obviously = π ( ) Im(π ). By the definition φ, Im(φ) consists of those points y with y, e i λ i. For any x, π (x), e i = x, v i λ i. So π ( ) Im(φ), and thus Im(π ) Im(φ). Conversely suppose y = π (z) = φ(w). Then z, v i = π (z), e i λ i. In other words, z. It follows Im(π ) Im(φ). Step 2.d N acts freely on Z. For z Z d, let I z = {i z i = 0}. Then (T d ) z = {t T d t i = 1 for i I z }. Claim II: The restriction map of π, π : (T d ) z T n, is injective. This implies N z = N (T d ) z = i(n) (T d ) z = ker(π) (T d ) z = ker(π (T d ) z ) = {1}. So the action is free. Proof of claim II. Suppose z Z = (ι φ) 1 (0), i.e. φ(z) ker(ι ) = Im(π ). Then φ(z) Im(π ) Im(φ) =. So one can find x so that φ(z) = π (x). Thus i I z z i = 0 φ(z), e i = λ i π (x), e i = λ i x, v i = λ i. In other words, x is a point in the intersection of facets whose normal vectors are v i. As a consequence, we see that the set of vectors {v i i I z } are linearly independent. Now let [t], [s] (T d ) z. If π([t]) = π([s]), then π(t) π(s) = i I z (t i s i )v i Z n. It follows that t i s i Z for i I z. So [t] = [s].

LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS 7 In conclusion, we see that M = C d /N = Z/N is a compact symplectic manifold of dimension 2d 2(d n) = 2n.. Remark. Since M is constructed via C d which is Kähler, with more works one can prove that M is actually a Kähler manifold. The moment polytope of M is. We need to show that M admits a Hamiltonian T n action which is effective. The action is actually very natural: Step 3.a Hamiltonian T n -action on M. Suppose z is a point such that φ(z) = π (x) for a vertex x of. Then from the proof of claim II we see that dim(t d ) z equals the number of facets of that meets at p, i.e. So by claim II, the map dim(t d ) z = n. π : (T d ) z T n is bijective. By identifying T n with (T d ) z we get an embedding j : T n T d with π j = Id. So T n acts on C d in a Hamiltonian way, with moment map j φ. Moreover, this T n - action commutes with the N-action we constructed above. Thus by the reduction by stages arguments (presented by Chao en last time), we get an induced Hamiltonian T n -action on M, whose moment map µ satisfies µ pr = j φ j, where pr is the projection from Z to M, and j is the inclusion from Z to C d. Step 3.b The above T n -action is effective. Since the T d action is effective, this induced T n -action is also effective. Step 3.c The moment polytope of M is. µ(m ) = µ pr(z) = j φ j(z) = j φ((i φ) 1 (0)) = j (ker(i )) = j (π ( )) = (π j) ( ) =.

8 LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS Equivariantly symplectomorphic toric manifolds. Step 4.a If (M 1, ω 1, T n, µ 1 ) and (M 2, ω 2, T n, µ 2 ) are two equivariantly diffeomorphic toric manifolds, then µ 1 (M 1 ) and µ 2 (M 2 ) differ by a translation. In fact, if we let Φ : M 1 M 2 be the equivariant diffeomorphism. Then Φ µ 2 is also a moment map for the T n -action on M 1, because d Φ µ 2, X = Φ d µ 2, X = Φ ι XM2 ω 2 = ι XM1 ω 1. So there exists a constant ξ t so that Φ µ 2 = µ 1 + ξ. It follows that µ 2 (M 2 ) = Φ µ 2 (M 1 ) = µ 1 (M 1 ) + ξ. Now suppose (M 1, ω 1, T n, µ 1 ) and (M 2, ω 2, T n, µ 2 ) are two symplectic toric manifolds with µ 1 (M 1 ) = µ 2 (M 2 ). We would like to prove that there exists an equivariant diffeomorphism that sends M 1 to M 2. Step 4.b If µ 1 (M 1 ) = µ 2 (M 2 ), one can construct by induction a diffeomorphism that intertwines the torus actions and moment maps. Step 4.c Show that the cohomology class of ω is determined by the moment polytope. Step 4.d Apply Moser s trick. For more details, c.f. Kai Cieliebak s notes, P. 40-45. Student presentation 3. Symplectic cut