Brian J. Morton Center for Urban and Regional Studies University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill June 8, 2010

Similar documents
APPENDIX I: Traffic Forecasting Model and Assumptions

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.

Trip Generation Model Development for Albany

Local Economic Activity Around Rapid Transit Stations

Westside Extension Los Angeles, California

Get Over, and Beyond, the Half-Mile Circle (for Some Transit Options)

2040 MTP and CTP Socioeconomic Data

BROOKINGS May

Urban Planning Word Search Level 1

Typical information required from the data collection can be grouped into four categories, enumerated as below.

The Built Environment, Car Ownership, and Travel Behavior in Seoul

Data Collection. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1

Economic Geography of the Long Island Region

Port Cities Conference: How Regional Planning can Help Support a Competitive Port. Christina DeMarco Metro Vancouver

Developing Built Environment Indicators for Urban Oregon. Dan Rubado, MPH EPHT Epidemiologist Oregon Public Health Division

Regional Performance Measures

THE LEGACY OF DUBLIN S HOUSING BOOM AND THE IMPACT ON COMMUTING

HORIZON 2030: Land Use & Transportation November 2005

Decentralisation and its efficiency implications in suburban public transport

Land Use and Zoning Page 1 of 10 LAND USE AND ZONING

GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Density and Walkable Communities

Regional Performance Measures

Figure 8.2a Variation of suburban character, transit access and pedestrian accessibility by TAZ label in the study area

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Transit Time Shed Analyzing Accessibility to Employment and Services

Chapter 12. Services

March 31, diversity. density. 4 D Model Development. submitted to: design. submitted by: destination

Speakers: Jeff Price, Federal Transit Administration Linda Young, Center for Neighborhood Technology Sofia Becker, Center for Neighborhood Technology

Developing the Transit Demand Index (TDI) Gregory Newmark, Regional Transportation Authority Transport Chicago Presentation July 25, 2012

2014 Certification Review Regional Data & Modeling

Regional Snapshot Series: Transportation and Transit. Commuting and Places of Work in the Fraser Valley Regional District

c. What is the most distinctive above ground result of high land costs and intensive land use? i. Describe the vertical geography of a skyscraper?

Geodatabase for Sustainable Urban Development. Presented By Rhonda Maronn Maurice Johns Daniel Ashney Jack Anliker

King City URA 6D Concept Plan

Transport Planning in Large Scale Housing Developments. David Knight

Regional Transit Development Plan Strategic Corridors Analysis. Employment Access and Commuting Patterns Analysis. (Draft)

Traffic Demand Forecast

Volume Title: Empirical Models of Urban Land Use: Suggestions on Research Objectives and Organization. Volume URL:

Changes in the Spatial Distribution of Mobile Source Emissions due to the Interactions between Land-use and Regional Transportation Systems

Lee County, Florida 2015 Forecast Report Population, Housing and Commercial Demand

Lee County, Alabama 2015 Forecast Report Population, Housing and Commercial Demand

Understanding Land Use and Walk Behavior in Utah

accessibility accessibility by-pass bid-rent curve bridging point administrative centre How easy or difficult a place is to reach.

Key Issue 1: Why Do Services Cluster Downtown?

PlaceTypes. How the built environment is measured. Variables Measures Levels. AREA TYPE + DEVELOPMENT TYPE = PlaceType

Los Alamos Planning Advisory Committee. Stephen Peterson March 19, 2007

Creation of built environment indices

Neighborhood Locations and Amenities

TRANSPORT MODE CHOICE AND COMMUTING TO UNIVERSITY: A MULTINOMIAL APPROACH

Transit Modeling Update. Trip Distribution Review and Recommended Model Development Guidance

SBCAG Travel Model Upgrade Project 3rd Model TAC Meeting. Jim Lam, Stewart Berry, Srini Sundaram, Caliper Corporation December.

Guidelines on Using California Land Use/Transportation Planning Tools

Land Use Modeling at ABAG. Mike Reilly October 3, 2011

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

Date: June 19, 2013 Meeting Date: July 5, Consideration of the City of Vancouver s Regional Context Statement

CLAREMONT MASTER PLAN 2017: LAND USE COMMUNITY INPUT

GIS for the Non-Expert

Travel behavior of low-income residents: Studying two contrasting locations in the city of Chennai, India

River North Multi-Modal Transit Analysis

Key Issue 1: Why Do Services Cluster Downtown?

Council Workshop on Neighbourhoods Thursday, October 4 th, :00 to 4:00 p.m. Burlington Performing Arts Centre

The Spatial Structure of Cities: International Examples of the Interaction of Government, Topography and Markets

Mapping Accessibility Over Time

Area Classification of Surrounding Parking Facility Based on Land Use Functionality

The Model Research of Urban Land Planning and Traffic Integration. Lang Wang

Subject: Note on spatial issues in Urban South Africa From: Alain Bertaud Date: Oct 7, A. Spatial issues

Chao Liu, Ting Ma, and Sevgi Erdogan National Center for Smart Growth Research & Education (NCSG) University of Maryland, College Park

Frequently Asked Questions

for sale HOLLYWOOD HILLS CENTURY CITY BEVERLY HILLS WEST HOLLYWOOD MELROSE AVE ROMAINE ST 843 NORTH LA BREA AVE WARING AVE WILLOUGHBY AVE

Advancing Urban Models in the 21 st Century. Jeff Tayman Lecturer, Dept. of Economics University of California, San Diego

Internal Capture in Mixed-Use Developments (MXDs) and Vehicle Trip and Parking Reductions in Transit-Oriented Developments (TODs)

CIV3703 Transport Engineering. Module 2 Transport Modelling

Development of modal split modeling for Chennai

The role of employment subcenters in residential location decisions

FSUTMS Framework for Integrating Land Use Modeling

Encapsulating Urban Traffic Rhythms into Road Networks

To Drive or Not to Drive:

Bishkek City Development Agency. Urban Planning Bishkek

Appendix B. Land Use and Traffic Modeling Documentation

New Partners for Smart Growth: Building Safe, Healthy, and Livable Communities Mayor Jay Williams, Youngstown OH

CITY OF CEDAR FALLS D O W N T O W N PA R K I N G S T U D Y P U B L I C W O R K S H O P D E C E M B E R 5,

THE MOST TRANSPARENT TREND in metropolitan areas is the decentralization of jobs and housing into

Changes in Land Use, Transportation System and the Mobility in Gifu by using Historical Map, Statistics and Personal Trip Survey Data

Developing Innovation Village, Baltimore

Module 3 Educator s Guide Overview

StanCOG Transportation Model Program. General Summary

Employment Decentralization and Commuting in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Symposium on the Work of Leon Moses

Overview of Improved Data and Tools for Integrated Land Use-Transportation Planning in California Caltrans Planning Horizons program November 7, 2012

Impact of Metropolitan-level Built Environment on Travel Behavior

A Hybrid Approach for Determining Traffic Demand in Large Development Areas

APPENDIX I - AREA PLANS

Transit Service Gap Technical Documentation

Urban Revival in America

TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL. Chapter 6

Palmerston North Area Traffic Model

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN RISK ASSESSMENT

Transcription:

Brian J. Morton Center for Urban and Regional Studies University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill June 8, 2010

1. TRANUS Highway vehicle technology Trips Mode choice Link-level traffic volumes and average speeds 2. Emission factors model Locations of employment and residences Emissions from highway vehicles, rail transit vehicles, and power plants Assess scenarios using integrated land usetransportation model 3. CMAQ Built environment Residential locational choice models Design future scenarios Ozone concentrations and population exposures Travel mode choice models Input-output model of Mecklenburg County Translate demand models and county s economic structure into model parameters Populate model s databases with baseline land use, employment, households, and transportation supply Calibrate land and travel demand parameters 2

Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail TWU Information FIRE etc. Professional etc. Educational Services etc. Arts, Entertain, etc. Other Services Public Admin. High-Income HHs Medium-Income HHs Low-Income HHs Commercial Land Other Business Sector Land Residential Land Central Business District Downtown Mixed Use Neighborhood Mixed Use Low-Intensity Mixed Use Single-Family Residential Large-Lot Residential Forest/Limited Development Large-Lot Industrial/ Undeveloped 3

Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade TWU Information FIRE etc. Professional etc. Educational Services etc. Arts, Entertain, etc. Households (by income) I-I HBW trips Other Services Public Admin. External HBW trips are specified in an exogenous trip matrix 4

Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade TWU Information FIRE etc. Professional etc. Educational Services etc. Arts, Entertain, etc. Households (by income) I-I HBO trips Other Services Public Admin. NHB trips are specified in an exogenous trip matrix 5

34 raw variables characterize built environment in census block groups Development, employment, population, housing, open space, tree canopy, floodplain Roads, intersections, bus stops Distances to supermarket, gas station, park, school Parcel value, ratio of building value to parcel value 5 factors: walkability, local/regional accessibility, property values, agglomeration (mixture of economic sectors), and industrial areas 8 neighborhood types 6

Neighborhood Types CBD Downtown Mixed Use Neighborhood Mixed Use Low-Intensity Mixed Use Single Family Residential Large-Lot Residential Forest/Limited Development Large-Lot Industrial/Undeveloped

Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade TWU Other Business Sector Land Information FIRE etc. Professional etc. Educational Services etc. Commercial Land Arts, Entertain, etc. Other Services Public Admin. Households Neighborhood Types (TRANUS attractors) Residential Land 8

Trip categories Home-based work H0me-based other Non-home based Modes Walk SOV Carpool Local bus and express bus Light rail, commuter rail, and bus rapid transit Next step: expressing the influence of neighborhood type on mode choice 9

< 9,500 links 21 link types 10

A link type may have mode-specific penalties Penalties amplify disutility of travel time. Penalties are greatest for SOV and carpool, and least for walk. This type of connector is walkfriendly (and transit supportive). 11

Unique zone (black color) Intense mix of office, retail, and entertainment High local/regional accessibility via all modes Bus transit center Walk friendly 12

Yellow zones Relatively small parcels Mixed land uses Downtown areas and older neighborhoods, including streetcar suburbs Walk friendly 13

Magenta zones Residential development Forested Inexpensive land Limited local/regional accessibility Not walk friendly 14

Many walk-friendly areas in and south of historical CBD 15

Far fewer walk-friendly areas in southern Mecklenburg 16

Land Use & Scenarios Brian Eun Joo Cho Tracy Hadden-Loh Daniel Rodriguez Shaopeng Zhong Transportation Elizabeth Shay Asad Khattak Brian and Daniel * Includes students and former students Neighborhoods Yan Song Bev Wilson Transportation Validation Asad Xin Wang Brian and Daniel Vehicular Emissions Chris Frey Nagui Rouphail Haibo Zhai 17

EPA STAR Grant R831835 (Bryan Bloomer) NCSU s ITRE & UNC for matching funds Joe Huegy, Mei Ingram, & Bing Mei at ITRE for travel behavior survey Twyla McDermott, Anna Gallup, & others with City of Charlotte & Mecklenburg County for data Vicki Bott (UNC-C) & Rebecca Yarbrough (CCOG) for help with neighborhood types TRANUS (Tomás de la Barra & Juancarlo Añez) Lincoln Institute for Land Policy research fellowship