ROBUST PASSIVE OBSERVER-BASED CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF SINGULAR SYSTEMS

Similar documents
Research Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components

Robust Input-Output Energy Decoupling for Uncertain Singular Systems

Fault Detection Observer Design in Low Frequency Domain for Linear Time-delay Systems

Output Stabilization of Time-Varying Input Delay System using Interval Observer Technique

ON POLE PLACEMENT IN LMI REGION FOR DESCRIPTOR LINEAR SYSTEMS. Received January 2011; revised May 2011

DISSIPATION CONTROL OF AN N-SPECIES FOOD CHAIN SYSTEM

Research Article Stabilization Analysis and Synthesis of Discrete-Time Descriptor Markov Jump Systems with Partially Unknown Transition Probabilities

Observer-based sampled-data controller of linear system for the wave energy converter

State Feedback and State Estimators Linear System Theory and Design, Chapter 8.

Delay-dependent stability and stabilization of neutral time-delay systems

Robust Output Feedback Control for Fractional Order Nonlinear Systems with Time-varying Delays

Research Article Delay-Dependent H Filtering for Singular Time-Delay Systems

LINEAR QUADRATIC OPTIMAL CONTROL BASED ON DYNAMIC COMPENSATION. Received October 2010; revised March 2011

Optimal algorithm and application for point to point iterative learning control via updating reference trajectory

FINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES. Danlei Chu, Tongwen Chen, Horacio J. Marquez

Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays

SYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Control and Dynamical Systems. CDS 110b

On Design of Reduced-Order H Filters for Discrete-Time Systems from Incomplete Measurements

IN many practical systems, there is such a kind of systems

1 (30 pts) Dominant Pole

LMIs for Observability and Observer Design

CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING

Minimal Input Selection for Robust Control

Delay-Dependent Stability Criteria for Linear Systems with Multiple Time Delays

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Control and Dynamical Systems. CDS 110b

STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR SYSTEMS WITH LARGE DELAY PERIOD: A SWITCHING METHOD. Received March 2011; revised July 2011

Adaptive synchronization of chaotic neural networks with time delays via delayed feedback control

Prashant Mhaskar, Nael H. El-Farra & Panagiotis D. Christofides. Department of Chemical Engineering University of California, Los Angeles

Delay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delays

Design of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone

Observability. It was the property in Lyapunov stability which allowed us to resolve that

Identification Methods for Structural Systems

Improved delay-dependent globally asymptotic stability of delayed uncertain recurrent neural networks with Markovian jumping parameters

IMPULSIVE CONTROL OF DISCRETE-TIME NETWORKED SYSTEMS WITH COMMUNICATION DELAYS. Shumei Mu, Tianguang Chu, and Long Wang

Topic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback

Correspondence should be addressed to Chien-Yu Lu,

Module 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems

The norms can also be characterized in terms of Riccati inequalities.

Linear Matrix Inequalities in Robust Control. Venkataramanan (Ragu) Balakrishnan School of ECE, Purdue University MTNS 2002

RECENTLY, the study of cooperative control of multiagent

Riccati Equations and Inequalities in Robust Control

FUZZY CONTROL OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS WITH INPUT SATURATION USING MULTIPLE MODEL STRUCTURE. Min Zhang and Shousong Hu

Research Article Observer-Based Robust Passive Control for a Class of Uncertain Neutral Systems: An Integral Sliding Mode Approach

Memory State Feedback Control for Singular Systems with Multiple Internal Incommensurate Constant Point Delays

POLE PLACEMENT. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19

Multivariable MRAC with State Feedback for Output Tracking

Graph and Controller Design for Disturbance Attenuation in Consensus Networks

6 OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN

Min-Max Output Integral Sliding Mode Control for Multiplant Linear Uncertain Systems

Model reduction for linear systems by balancing

ONGOING WORK ON FAULT DETECTION AND ISOLATION FOR FLIGHT CONTROL APPLICATIONS

STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR DISCRETE T-S FUZZY SYSTEMS

Pole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2

New Lyapunov Krasovskii functionals for stability of linear retarded and neutral type systems

Research Article Partial Pole Placement in LMI Region

BALANCING-RELATED MODEL REDUCTION FOR DATA-SPARSE SYSTEMS

STABILIZATION FOR A CLASS OF UNCERTAIN MULTI-TIME DELAYS SYSTEM USING SLIDING MODE CONTROLLER. Received April 2010; revised August 2010

Mathematics for Control Theory

Design of Discrete-time Repetitive Control System Based on Two-dimensional Model

Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft

Delay-Dependent Exponential Stability of Linear Systems with Fast Time-Varying Delay

Nonlinear Controller Design of the Inverted Pendulum System based on Extended State Observer Limin Du, Fucheng Cao

State estimation of uncertain multiple model with unknown inputs

Applied Mathematics Letters

Introduction to Modern Control MT 2016

Marcus Pantoja da Silva 1 and Celso Pascoli Bottura 2. Abstract: Nonlinear systems with time-varying uncertainties

Robust Anti-Windup Compensation for PID Controllers

Controller Design for Robust Output Regulation of Regular Linear Systems

System Identification by Nuclear Norm Minimization

Filter Design for Linear Time Delay Systems

Convex Optimization Approach to Dynamic Output Feedback Control for Delay Differential Systems of Neutral Type 1,2

ROBUST QUANTIZED H CONTROL FOR NETWORK CONTROL SYSTEMS WITH MARKOVIAN JUMPS AND TIME DELAYS. Received December 2012; revised April 2013

The ϵ-capacity of a gain matrix and tolerable disturbances: Discrete-time perturbed linear systems

Research Article Robust Tracking Control for Switched Fuzzy Systems with Fast Switching Controller

SLIDING SURFACE MATCHED CONDITION IN SLIDING MODE CONTROL

Rank Reduction for Matrix Pair and Its Application in Singular Systems

Stability, Pole Placement, Observers and Stabilization

Modern Optimal Control

CHATTERING-FREE SMC WITH UNIDIRECTIONAL AUXILIARY SURFACES FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEM WITH STATE CONSTRAINTS. Jian Fu, Qing-Xian Wu and Ze-Hui Mao

Research Article An Equivalent LMI Representation of Bounded Real Lemma for Continuous-Time Systems

Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 4 Passivity

Impulsive control for permanent magnet synchronous motors with uncertainties: LMI approach

Lecture 19 Observability and state estimation

Control Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli

Control Systems Design

Stability Analysis and H Synthesis for Linear Systems With Time-Varying Delays

Minimal Input and Output Selection for Stability of Systems with Uncertainties

Design of Observer-Based 2-d Control Systems with Delays Satisfying Asymptotic Stablitiy Condition

Problem Set 5 Solutions 1

Design of State Observer for a Class of Non linear Singular Systems Described by Takagi-Sugeno Model

A New Robust Decentralized Control Method for Interconnected Nonlinear Systems Based on State Extension and Adaptive Tracking

ROBUST STABILITY TEST FOR UNCERTAIN DISCRETE-TIME SYSTEMS: A DESCRIPTOR SYSTEM APPROACH

5. Observer-based Controller Design

Comparison of four state observer design algorithms for MIMO system

Results on stability of linear systems with time varying delay

A new robust delay-dependent stability criterion for a class of uncertain systems with delay

Multiple-mode switched observer-based unknown input estimation for a class of switched systems

Reliable H Filtering for Stochastic Spatial-Temporal Systems with Sensor Saturations and Failures

Distributed Adaptive Synchronization of Complex Dynamical Network with Unknown Time-varying Weights

Transcription:

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATON AND SYSTEMS SCIENCES Volume 5 Number 3-4 Pages 480 487 c 2009 Institute for Scientific Computing and Information ROBUST PASSIVE OBSERVER-BASED CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF SINGULAR SYSTEMS LI YANG 1 Abstract In this paper passive uncertainties are introduced and we deal with the robust passive observer-based control problem for a class of singular systems and then provide the sufficient conditions of the passive control for the closed-loop systems of this kind of systems whose controller is based on observer Finally two numerical examples are provided to show the usefulness and the feasibility of the presented approach Key Words passive control observer-based controller passive uncertainty 1 Introduction In the past decade dissipative system theory has played the important role in the control theory Passivation is one of the most important aspects of dissipation ie the energy supply rate is taken as the product of input and output and passivation represents the attenuation characteristic of the systems under the condition of bounded input In fact passivation is the advanced abstract of stability Therefore passive control problem are focused on by a lot of scholars [1 7 And the dissipative perturbation was proposed by Xie [8 Then dissipative uncertainties were discussed in robust control theory [9 This kind of uncertainties included the other kind of uncertainties description when some matrices are taken as the special forms and the dissipative uncertainties can include both the phase information and the gain information meanwhile the energy information of uncertainties are taken into account In the paper we introduced the passive uncertainties and discuss the passive observer-based control problem for a class of singular systems Then we establish the criterion of passivation for this kind of systems which is based on observer by matrix inequalities and we get the controllers of the systems meanwhile the closedloop systems and uncertainties are all passive Finally we testify the feasibility of the theorems by the numerical examples The paper is structured as follows In the next section Section 2 we introduce notations and review some important definitions and lemmas And then in Section 3 we discuss the passive observer-based control problem and design the controller In Section 4 passive uncertainties are proposed and robust passive control problem for singular systems with passive uncertainties is discussed Section 5 contains numerical examples by which we can testify the feasibility of the theorems The final Section 6 contains conclusions Received by the editors January 15 2008 and in revised form October 9 2008 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 35R35 49J40 60G40 480

ROBUST PASSIVE OBSERVER-BASED CONTROL FOR SINGULAR SYSTEMS 481 2 System Description Consider the following singular system (1) { Eẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t) y(t) = Cx(t) + Du(t) E is singular matrix A B C D are all known constant matrices of appropriate dimensions x(t) R n is state y(t) R n is output u(t) R n is input We assume that D are symmetry matrices and D is negative Next our purpose is to design passive controllers based on observer for system (1): (2) { E ˆx(t) = Aˆx(t) + Bu(t) + L(y C ˆx Du) u(t) = K ˆx(t) We introduce the error vector e(t) = x(t) ˆx(t) and the error dynamic equation is as follows: Eė(t) = (A LC)e Therefore the closed-loop system of system (1) via the controller (2) is (3) Ẽ x(t) = Ã x(t) Ẽ = and u y can be denoted as [ E 0 A LC 0 e 0 E Ã = x = BK A + BK x u = [ K K x y = [ DK C + DK x Definition 1 [10 For system (1) if there exists nonnegative storage function V (x) (V (0) = 0) so that the following inequality (4) V (t) u T y holds for any t 0 then system (1) is said to be passive In this paper we let the storage function be V (t) = x T E T P x Lemma 1 [11 S11 S For given positive symmetry matrix S = 12 S S 21 S 11 22 is r r dimensions then the following three conclusions are equivalent: (i) S < 0; (ii) S 11 < 0 S 22 S T 12S 1 11 S 12 < 0; (iii) S 22 < 0 S 11 S 12 S 1 22 ST 12 < 0

482 L YANG 3 Passive Observer-based Controller Design In this section a method is given to design passive observer-based controller for system (1) Theorem 1 For singular system (1) if the following inequality holds for any t 0 E T P = P T E 0 A (5) T P + P A T P T B 1 2 CT B T P 1 2 C 1 2 DT 1 2 D < 0 then system (1) is passive Proof: According Definition 1 we can get V u T y = (Ax + Bu) T P x + x T P T (Ax + Bu) u T (Cx + Du) = [ [ x T u T x Π u A Π = T P + P A T P T B 1 2 CT B T P 1 2 C 1 2 DT 1 2 D thus if inequality (5) holds system (1) is passivethis complete the proof For closed-loop system (3) we consider the storage function as the following V (t) = x T Ẽ T P x P = P 0 0 P Theorem 2 For system (1) if there is feasible solution X L W satisfying the following inequalities X T E T = EX 0 Ξ 11 W T B T + 1 2 (6) W T CX W T BW + 1 2 XT C T W Ξ 22 W T < 0 W W D 1 then controller (2) is passive controller for closed-loop system (3) K = W X 1 Ξ 11 = X T A T + AX L T L Ξ 22 = X T A T + AX + W T B T + BW 1 2 W T CX 1 2 XT C T W and the matrix L satisfies L = LCX Proof: For the closed-loop system

ROBUST PASSIVE OBSERVER-BASED CONTROL FOR SINGULAR SYSTEMS 483 V u T y [ A LC 0 = x T BK A + BK T [ P x + x T T A LC 0 P BK A + BK x K x T T [ DK C + DK x K T = x T [ Ξ11 Ξ12 Ξ 21 Ξ22 x Ξ 11 = A T P + P T A C T L T P P T LC K T DK Ξ 12 = K T B T P + 1 2 KT C + K T DK Ξ 21 = P T BK + 1 2 CT K + K T DK Ξ 22 = A T P + P T A + K T B T P + P T BK 1 2 KT C 1 2 CT K K T DK Therefore if Ξ X T 0 < 0 the closed-loop system is passive Then multiply 0 X T to Ξ X 0 < 0 from the left side and from the right side X = P 0 X 1 Let L = LCX we can obtain inequality (6) according to complementary Schur theorem Thus if X W L is one of feasible solutions of (6) the passive feedback controller is given by K = W X 1 and matrix L satisfies L = LCXThis complete the proof 4 Robust Passive Observer-based Controller Design Consider the following systems with uncertainties Eẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t) + L i=1 H iω i (t) (7) y(t) = Cx(t) + Du(t) z i (t) = F i x(t) + F ui u(t) + L j=1 F ωijω j (t) ω i (t) R ki and z i (t) R hi are uncertain variables H i F i F ui and F ωij are all known constant matrices of appropriate dimensions Definition 2 For system (7) if the uncertain variables ω i (t) and z i (t) satisfy the following inequalities: (8) < ω i z i > T 0 i = 1 2 L then the uncertainties of system (7) are said to be passive If we denote ω = the inequality (8) can be rewrited as ω 1 ω L z = (9) < ω z > T 0 z 1 z L

484 L YANG In order to be simple we introduce the following signals F = Ω i = F 1 F L F u = F u1 F ul F ωi = 0 0 1 2 F T i IT i 0 0 1 2 F T ui IT i 1 2 I 1 if i 2 I 1 if ui F ωi1 F ωil 2 (I if ωi + Fωi T IT i ) H = [ H 1 H L Fω = [ F ω1 F ωl I T i = [ 0 1 I hi 0 i+1 0 L i = 1 L The next purpose is to design passive controller based on observer as controller (2) for singular system (7) so that the closed-loop system and the uncertainties are passive Then the error system of system (7) via observer (2) is (10) Eė = (A LC)e + Hω and the closed-loop system of system (7) via the observer (2) is (11) Ẽ x = Ã x + Hω H = [ H H Theorem 3 For system (7) if there is feasible solution X L W satisfying the following inequalities X T E T = EX 0 Γ 11 Γ 12 2HΛ X T F T W T (12) Γ T 12 Γ 22 2HΛ X T Fu T W T 2ΛH T F X 2ΛH T F u X 2F ω Λ 2ΛFω T 0 < 0 W W 0 D 1 then controller (2) is passive for system (7) K = W X 1 Γ 11 = X T A T + AX L L Γ 12 = W T B T + 1 2 W T CX Γ 22 = X T A T + AX + W T B T + BW 1 2 W T CX 1 2 XT C T W and matrix L satisfies L = LCX

ROBUST PASSIVE OBSERVER-BASED CONTROL FOR SINGULAR SYSTEMS 485 Proof: For closed-loop system (11) V u T y [ A LC 0 = ( BK A + BK [ x + Hω) T P x + x T A LC 0 P T ( BK A + BK x + Hω) K x T T [ DK C + DK x K T = x T Θ11 Θ 12 x + ω [ Θ 21 Θ T H T P 22 H T P x + xt P T H P T ω H Θ 11 Θ 12 P T H = ζ T Θ 21 Θ 22 P T H ζ H T P H T P 0 ζ T = [ x T ω T Θ 11 = A T P + P T A C T L T P P T LC K T DK Θ 12 = K T B T P + 1 2 KT C + K T DK Θ 21 = P T BK + 1 2 CT K + K T DK Θ 22 = A T P + P T A + K T B T P + P T BK 1 2 KT C 1 2 CT K K T DK And if ζ T Ω i ζ 0 inequality (8) holds ie the uncertainties of system is passive Therefore according S-procedure [11 if there exist λ 1 0 λ L 0 inequality L (13) Θ λ i Ω i < 0 holds then i=1 (14) ζ T Θζ 0 and inequality (9) holds too ie the uncertainties of system and the closed-loop system (11) are both passive The inequalities (13) is equal to 11 12 P T H 1 2 F T λ (15) = 21 22 P T H 1 2 F u T λ < 0 H T P 1 2 λf HT P 1 2 λf u 1 2 λf ω 1 2 λf ω T 11 = A T P + P T A C T L T P P T LC K T DK 12 = K T B T P + 1 2 KT C + K T DK

486 L YANG 21 = P T BK + 1 2 CT K + K T DK 22 = A T P + P T A + K T B T P + P T BK 1 2 KT C 1 2 CT K K T DK X T 0 0 X 0 0 Then multiply 0 X T 0 to < 0 from left side and 0 X 0 from 0 0 2Λ 0 0 2Λ right side X = P 1 λ = diag{λ 1 λ L } and Λ = λ 1 Let L = LCX we can obtain inequality (12) according to complementary Schur theorem Thus if X W L is one of feasible solutions of (12) the strictly passive feedback controller is given by K = W X 1 and matrix L satisfies L = LCX This complete the proof 5 Numerical Example Example 1 The parameters of system (1) are as follows: 1 0 13 0 1 1 5 0 E = A = B = C = 0 1 0 5 1 2 0 5 D = 1/16 0 0 1/16 By using tool box of Matlab we can get X = 06789 0 W = 00173 03418 78909 18899 60326 67591 then we can obtain the controller based on observer as (2) 114821 55294 14641 00253 K = L = 83821 197756 01928 70714 Example 2 The parameters of system (7) are just as the Example 1 and the other parameters is as follows: 4 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 2 05 0 1 H = F = 1 0 0 005 1 15 1 2 F u = 0 1 2 1 F ω = 0 1 1 2 1 0 5 1 3 0 0 2 0 1 3 2 By using tool box of Matlab we can get X = 09609 0 W = 01400 03667 33192 86038 45631 73541 and λ 1 = 05670 λ 2 = 06007 then we can obtain the controller based on observer as (2) K = 00358 234606 L = 18269 200529 16269 16668 11104 119858

ROBUST PASSIVE OBSERVER-BASED CONTROL FOR SINGULAR SYSTEMS 487 6 Conclusion We discuss the robust passive observer-based problem for a class of singular systems then we give the method to design passive state feedback controllers based on observer and it may bring forward a feasible way to design observer and make the closed-loop system dissipative for singular systems but this kind of controller is designed by matrices inequalities method thus we can not gain the necessary conditions References [1 Li Zhihu Shao Huihe Wang Jingcheng Dissipative control for linear time delay systems Control Theory and Applications 200118(5): 838-842 [2 Xinzhuang Dong Qingling Zhang Passive Control of Linear Singular Systems Journal of Biomathematics 2004 19: 185-187 [3 Xinzhuang Dong Qingling Zhang Passive Control of Linear Singular Systems Journal of Biomathematics 2004 19: 185-187 [4 Xinzhuang Dong Qingling Zhang Robust passive control for singular systems with timevarying uncertainties Control Theory and Applications 2004 21: 517-520 [5 Fridman E Shaked U On Delay-Dependent Passivity IEEE Transactions Automatic on Automatic Control 2002 47: 664-669 [6 Guan Xinping Hua Changchun Duan Guangren Robust Dissipation Control of Uncertain Time-Delay Systems[J Systems Engineering and Electronics 2002 24(1):48-51 [7 Yang Li Zhang Qingling etc Robust Inpulse Dissipative Control of Singular Systems with Uncertainties Acta Automatica Sinica 2007 33(5): 554-556 [8 Shoulie Xie Lihua Xie Robust Dissipative Control for Linear Systems with Dissipative and Nonlinear Perturbation[J Systems & Control Letters 1997 29(5):255-268 [9 Liu Fei Su Hongye Chu Jian Robust Strictly Dissip ative Control for Linear Discrete Time- Delay Systems[J Acta Automatica Sinica 2002 28(6):897-903 [10 Yang Li Zhang Qingling etc Robust Dissipative Control for a Class of Singular Time-delay Systems with Uncertainties Control Theory and Application 2007 24(6): 1038-1042 [11 Yu Li Robust Control-Linear Matrix Inequality Method[M Tsinghua Press 2002 1 College of Mathematics Liaoning University Shenyang 110036 China E-mail: yangli2923@163com