A Model-Free Adaptive Control of Pulsed GTAW

Similar documents
Development of Second Order Plus Time Delay (SOPTD) Model from Orthonormal Basis Filter (OBF) Model

Linear and Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Quadruple Tank Process

Research on Longitudinal Tracking Control for a Simulated Intelligent Vehicle Platoon

Creating a Sliding Mode in a Motion Control System by Adopting a Dynamic Defuzzification Strategy in an Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System

RESGen: Renewable Energy Scenario Generation Platform

DEPTH CONTROL OF THE INFANTE AUV USING GAIN-SCHEDULED REDUCED-ORDER OUTPUT FEEDBACK 1. C. Silvestre A. Pascoal

Simplified Identification Scheme for Structures on a Flexible Base

Modelling, Simulation and Control of Quadruple Tank Process

Theoretical and Experimental Implementation of DC Motor Nonlinear Controllers

Control of a Power Assisted Lifting Device

Substructure Finite Element Model Updating of a Space Frame Structure by Minimization of Modal Dynamic Residual

FREQUENCY DOMAIN FLUTTER SOLUTION TECHNIQUE USING COMPLEX MU-ANALYSIS

Section 7.4: Integration of Rational Functions by Partial Fractions

Model Predictive Control Lecture VIa: Impulse Response Models

Intelligent Positioning Plate Predictive Control and Concept of Diagnosis System Design

Direct and Indirect Robust Adaptive Fuzzy Controllers for a Class of Nonlinear Systems

Stability of Model Predictive Control using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Optimisation

NEURAL CONTROLLERS FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEMS IN MATLAB

Adaptive Fault-tolerant Control with Control Allocation for Flight Systems with Severe Actuator Failures and Input Saturation

Sources of Non Stationarity in the Semivariogram

FOUNTAIN codes [3], [4] provide an efficient solution

The Real Stabilizability Radius of the Multi-Link Inverted Pendulum

Classify by number of ports and examine the possible structures that result. Using only one-port elements, no more than two elements can be assembled.

The Linear Quadratic Regulator

Step-Size Bounds Analysis of the Generalized Multidelay Adaptive Filter

Simulation Based Analysis of Two Different Control Strategies for PMSM

Mathematical Models of Physiological Responses to Exercise

System identification of buildings equipped with closed-loop control devices

The spreading residue harmonic balance method for nonlinear vibration of an electrostatically actuated microbeam

Applying Fuzzy Set Approach into Achieving Quality Improvement for Qualitative Quality Response

AN ALTERNATIVE DECOUPLED SINGLE-INPUT FUZZY SLIDING MODE CONTROL WITH APPLICATIONS

AN ALTERNATIVE DECOUPLED SINGLE-INPUT FUZZY SLIDING MODE CONTROL WITH APPLICATIONS

Study on the impulsive pressure of tank oscillating by force towards multiple degrees of freedom

DESIGN AND SIMULATION OF SELF-TUNING PREDICTIVE CONTROL OF TIME-DELAY PROCESSES

Research Article Permanence of a Discrete Predator-Prey Systems with Beddington-DeAngelis Functional Response and Feedback Controls

Reducing Conservatism in Flutterometer Predictions Using Volterra Modeling with Modal Parameter Estimation

BLOOM S TAXONOMY. Following Bloom s Taxonomy to Assess Students

Sareban: Evaluation of Three Common Algorithms for Structure Active Control

Discussion of The Forward Search: Theory and Data Analysis by Anthony C. Atkinson, Marco Riani, and Andrea Ceroli

International Journal of Physical and Mathematical Sciences journal homepage:

arxiv: v1 [cs.sy] 22 Nov 2018

Discussion Papers Department of Economics University of Copenhagen

Nonlinear parametric optimization using cylindrical algebraic decomposition

Deakin Research Online

Multivariable Ripple-Free Deadbeat Control

Uncertainties of measurement

Lecture Notes: Finite Element Analysis, J.E. Akin, Rice University

Robust Tracking and Regulation Control of Uncertain Piecewise Linear Hybrid Systems

UNCERTAINTY FOCUSED STRENGTH ANALYSIS MODEL

Control Performance Monitoring of State-Dependent Nonlinear Processes

A Macroscopic Traffic Data Assimilation Framework Based on Fourier-Galerkin Method and Minimax Estimation

Uncertainty Evaluation of Toluene Determination in Room Air by Thermal Desorption Gas Chromatography

DIGITAL LINEAR QUADRATIC SMITH PREDICTOR

Online Solution of State Dependent Riccati Equation for Nonlinear System Stabilization

Lecture Notes On THEORY OF COMPUTATION MODULE - 2 UNIT - 2

Estimating models of inverse systems

Mixed Type Second-order Duality for a Nondifferentiable Continuous Programming Problem

Data-Efficient Control Policy Search using Residual Dynamics Learning

FRTN10 Exercise 12. Synthesis by Convex Optimization

Nonparametric Identification and Robust H Controller Synthesis for a Rotational/Translational Actuator

STABILIZATIO ON OF LONGITUDINAL AIRCRAFT MOTION USING MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL AND EXACT LINEARIZATION

Chapter 3 MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Expert Sets and its Application in Decision Making

FEA Solution Procedure

NEURAL CONTROL OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS: A REFERENCE GOVERNOR APPROACH

Fuzzy Control of a Nonlinear Deterministic System for Different Operating Points

Regression Analysis of Octal Rings as Mechanical Force Transducers

Solving the Lienard equation by differential transform method

Integrated Design of a Planar Maglev System for Micro Positioning

Curves - Foundation of Free-form Surfaces

Optimization in Predictive Control Algorithm

Discontinuous Fluctuation Distribution for Time-Dependent Problems

Dynamic Optimization of First-Order Systems via Static Parametric Programming: Application to Electrical Discharge Machining

Technical Note. ODiSI-B Sensor Strain Gage Factor Uncertainty

Hybrid modelling and model reduction for control & optimisation

Efficiency Increase and Input Power Decrease of Converted Prototype Pump Performance

Assignment Fall 2014

High speed analysis of high pressure combustion in a constant volume cell

QUANTILE ESTIMATION IN SUCCESSIVE SAMPLING

Chapter 4 Supervised learning:

Effects of Soil Spatial Variability on Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

Model reduction of nonlinear systems using incremental system properties

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ROBUST CONTROL TECHNIQUES FOR OTTO-CYCLE MOTOR CONTROL

Conditions for Approaching the Origin without Intersecting the x-axis in the Liénard Plane

Ted Pedersen. Southern Methodist University. large sample assumptions implicit in traditional goodness

Convergence analysis of ant colony learning

Optimal Control, Statistics and Path Planning

EVALUATION OF GROUND STRAIN FROM IN SITU DYNAMIC RESPONSE

Methods of Design-Oriented Analysis The GFT: A Final Solution for Feedback Systems

Simulation and Modeling of Packet Loss on α-stable VoIP Traffic

Approximate optimal solution of the DTHJB equation for a class of nonlinear affine systems with unknown dead-zone constraints

Essentials of optimal control theory in ECON 4140

Model Discrimination of Polynomial Systems via Stochastic Inputs

Propagation of measurement uncertainty in spatial characterisation of recreational fishing catch rates using logistic transform indicator kriging

Prediction of Transmission Distortion for Wireless Video Communication: Analysis

Oil production optimization of several wells subject to choke degradation

Comparison of Monte Carlo and deterministic simulations of a silicon diode Jose A. Carrillo Λ, Irene M. Gamba y, Orazio Muscato z and Chi-Wang Shu x N

FRÉCHET KERNELS AND THE ADJOINT METHOD

Formally Verified Approximations of Definite Integrals

A New Approach to Direct Sequential Simulation that Accounts for the Proportional Effect: Direct Lognormal Simulation

Transcription:

A Model-Free Adaptive Control of Plsed GTAW F.L. Lv 1, S.B. Chen 1, and S.W. Dai 1 Institte of Welding Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 00030, P.R. China Department of Atomatic Control, NAEI, Yantai, 64001 arry@sjt.ed.cn Abastract. A closed-loop system is developed to control the weld pool geometry, which is specified by the bacside weld width. The welding crrent and speed are selected as the control variables. A MISO ARX model is sed to model this dynamic process. Becase of ncertainties in the GTAW process, it is very difficlt to design an effective control scheme by conventional modeling and control methods. A model-free adaptive control algorithm has been developed to control the welding process. Simlation confirmed that the developed control system is effective in achieving the desired fsion state. 1 Introdction The dynamic identification and control of arc welding processes has been explored throgh a nmber of stdies. Advanced control techniqes sch as adaptive control have been sed to generate sond welds [1,]. Artificial intelligence methodology was developed for modeling and controlling the welding process. Nmeros exciting controls with perfect performance have been achieved. George E. Coo[3] stdied the application for the variable polarity plasma arc welding. A self-learning fzzy neral networ control system of topside width enabled adaptive altering of welding parameters to compensate for changing environments in Chen S.B. s stdy[4]. Y M. Zhang[5] sed a nerofzzy model to model the welding process. Based on the dynamic fzzy model, a predictive control system has been developed to control the welding process. Zhang G.J.[6] investigated feasible intelligent control schemes. A doble-variable controller was designed. In fact, it jst is a spervisory control, not considering the cople relationship of variables. Recently, a model-free adaptive control scheme has been explored, which based on information from the I/O data of the controlled plant[7,8]. The main objective of this research was to explore applications for mode-free adaptive control algorithm in arc welding control, and in particlar the GTAW MISO(many inpt simple otpt process. The organization of this paper is as follows: we first identify the doble inpt simple otpt dynamic model of the GTAW process for simlation of the GTAW process; the basic model-free adaptive control algorithm is presented; finally, the simlation of GTAW process is shown. T.-J. Tarn et al. (Eds.: Robot. Weld., Intellige. & Atomation, LNCIS 36, pp. 333 339, 007. springerlin.com Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 007

334 F.L. LY, S.B. Chen, and S.W. Dai GTAW Process Modeling GTAW process is controlled by a nmber of parameters, inclding the welding crrent, arc length, and welding speed. As we all now, the correlation between the weld pool and arc length may not be straightforward. Compared with the arc length, the roles of the welding crrent and welding speed in determining the weld pool and weld fsion geometry are mch more significant and definite. Ths we select the welding speed (v and the welding crrent (I as control variables. The controlled process can therefore be defined as a GTAW process in which the welding crrent and speed are adjsted on-line to achieve the desired bacside width (w b of the weld pool. A polynomial AtoRegressive with exogenos inpt or ARX model representation[9] is selected as the model representation in this stdy. For a mltivariable system with one otpt and m inpts, consider the ARX model below: 1 1 Aq ( y ( = B( q ( + e ( (1 The model belongs to linear-in-the-parameter model, therefore, the parameter estimation can be performed sing least sqare method. The model in eqation (1 can be represented y ( = Τ ( + e ( The identification is ths simplified by estimation the model parameters. There are n+nm parameters to be identified, and here m is the nmber of inpts which is welding crrent (I and welding speed (v respectively, so 1 is welding crrent, is welding speed, and m eqals. Thogh experiment data, we can determine approximately that the evalation of n is 5. ARX model of bacside weld width (w b with welding parameters (I and v is derived sing the least sqare method developed with the Matlab program. First we achieve fll parameter model, then a redced model can be derived sing statistic hypothesis testing method as follows: y ( = ay ( 1 + ay ( + ay ( 3 + ay ( 4 1 3 4 + ay ( 5 + b( 1 + b( + b( 4 5 11 1 1 1 14 1 + b ( 1 + b ( 3 + b ( 5 1 3 5 where A= [ a1 a a3 a4 a5] = [ 1.45-0.7935 0.4569-0.314 0.11518] B = [ b11 b1 b14 b1 b3 b5 ] = [ 0.0085696-0.3748 0.0039714-0.1686 0.003674-0.079501], y is the bacside weld width, 1 and are the welding crrent and the welding speed, respectively. The feasibility of this model is verified by comparing the simlation reslts with the Matlab program and actal otpts. The sqare sm of residals is 0.0303437.3 model-free adaptive control design (

A Model-Free Adaptive Control of Plsed GTAW 335.1 Universal Process Model The following general discrete MISO nonlinear systems is considered = 0,1,, ( 1 ( n m ( 1 y ( + 1 = f Y, (, U, + 1 Where stands for discrete time y+ represents a one-dimensional state otpt is an inpt variable Y n = { y(,, y( n} (3 are the sets of system otpts m U = { (,, ( m} n and m are the orders of otpt y ( and inpt ( f ( is a general nonlinear fnction are the sets of system inpts Following assmptions are made abot the controlled plant: 1. When the system is in the steady state, it satisfies the condition that if ( = ( 1, then y ( + 1 = y (. The nonlinear fnction f ( has a continos gradient with respect to control inpt (. From the assmptions above, we have ( n m 1 1 1 ( n m 1 y ( + 1 y ( = f Y, (, U, + 1 f Y, ( 1, U, n m n m (, (, 1, 1 (, ( 1,, 1 ( n, ( 1, m ( 1 1 1, 1 n 1, ( 1, m, = f Y U + f Y U + + f Y U + f Y U Let n m n 1 m 1 ( ( 1 f Y, ( 1, U, + 1 f Y, ( 1, U, = ξ ( + 1 And sing the mean vale theorem in the Calcls, we obtain n m n m (, (, 1, + 1 (, ( 1,, + 1 (, ( 1,, 1 Τ n m = f Y 1 [ ( ( 1 U + ] f Y U f Y U

336 F.L. LY, S.B. Chen, and S.W. Dai where ( -1 = ( -1 + θ ( ( ( -1 we have, θ satisfies 0 θ 1. Therefore, ( 1 Τ ( [ ] y ( + 1 y ( = f ( -1, + 1 ( ( -1 + ξ ( + 1 (4 If ( ( -1 0, let ( ( ( = ( -1 f ( -1, 1 ( ( -1 ( ( -1 + + ξ ( + 1 Then eqation (4 can be written as [ ] Τ y ( + 1 y ( = ( ( ( -1 (5 where ( can be considered a psedo gradient of model (5. Note that when the system is in a steady state, becase of ( ( - 1 = 0, we have y ( + 1 = y (, so in this case, (5 is a valid expression. Eqation (5 is called niversal model.. Model-Free Adaptive Control Algorithm (..1 Estimation of the Psedo Gradient It is clear that the necessary condition that the niversal model (5 can be sed in practice is that the estimation of (, denoted as (, is available in real-time, and is sfficiently accrate. Considering the control action is nown, define the cost fnction Τ J( ( = y ( + 1 y( ( ( 1 + µ ( ( 1 (6 where ( -1 = ( -1- ( -, becase at the moment ( is naccessible we sbstitte ( 1 for it, y ( + 1 is the desired otpt of the controlled plant, µ is positive weighting constant which constrains the change of the psedo gradient ( ( 1. By sing (5, the minimization of the cost fnction (6 gives estimation ( η µ ˆ( = ˆ( 1 + ( 1 + ( 1 (7

A Model-Free Adaptive Control of Plsed GTAW 337 ( y ( ˆ ( 1 ( 1 where η is a sitable small positive nmber... Design of Model-Free Adaptive Control The model-free adaptive control is described as follows: Assme that the observed data { ( 1, y( } ( = 1, are nown, and the expected otpt y ( + 1 at (+1th time is given. Find a controller (, sch that the otpt of the system y+ ( 1 matches y ( + 1. In order to achieve a robst control, it is reqired that the following cost fnction is minimized: J( ( = y ( + 1 y( + 1 + λ ( ( 1 where λ is the weight. The analytic soltion is ( ( ρ λ ( ( = ( 1 + ( + ( y ( + 1 y( (8 where ρ is called a control parameter, which selection is closely related to the convergence of the control law. Eqation (8 is called the basic form of the model-free adaptive control law. 3 Simlation of GTAW Process Having analyzed the GTAW process and developed the GTAW MISO model (, we will demonstrate the effectiveness of the model-free adaptive control algorithm developed in GTAW process. Following are several steps that describe how the model-free adaptive algorithm wors. 1. For the observed inpt otpt data { ( 1, y( } and the developed niversal model (5, we can obtain ( which is the estimation of psedo partial derivative (, sing least sqares algorithm.. For the desired otpt y ( + 1, we have ( ( ρ λ ( ( = ( 1 + ( + ( y ( + 1 y( Then a new set of data { ( 1, y( } can be achieved, applying the control action ( to the GTAW process (here we se the model (.

338 F.L. LY, S.B. Chen, and S.W. Dai 3. Repeat steps 1 and above to generate a serial of data { ( 1, y( }. The desired bacside weld width was chosen as y = 5 mm. On selection the initial estimation of psedo partial derivative as = [ ] (0 0.5 0. Τ, Fig. shows the convergence procedre of the psedo partial derivative. Fig.3 and Fig.4 show the response of the system nder the model-free adaptive control with η = 1, µ = 1, ρ = 1 and λ = 5. Fig. 1. Psedo partial derivative Fig.. Control inpts Fig. 3. Bacside weld width

A Model-Free Adaptive Control of Plsed GTAW 339 4 Conclsion Becase arc welding is characterized as inherently variable, nonlinear, time varying and having a copling among parameters. Also the variations in the welding conditions case ncertainties in the dynamics. So it is very difficlt to design an effective control scheme by conventional modeling and control methods. It is has been shown by simlation that this process has been sccessflly controlled sing the model-free adaptive algorithm. Meanwhile this control method only needs the observed inpt otpt data, ths the MISO GTAW model developed is jst sed to simlate. Ths, the developed model-free adaptive control provides a promising technology for GTAW qality control. Acnowledgement This wor is partially spported by the National Natral Science Fondation of China nder Grand No. 60474036 and the Key Fondation Program of Shanghai Sciences & Technology Committee nder Grant No. -&. References 1. Kovacevic R., Zhang Y.M., (1997 Real-time image processing for monitoring the free weld pool srface. ASME Jornal of Mnfactring Science and Engineering 119(5:161-169.. Song J.B., Hardt D.E. (1994 Dynamic modeling and adaptive control of the gas metal arc welding process. ASME Jornal of Dynamics Systems, Measrement, and Control 116(3:405-410. 3. George E. Coo, Robert Joel Barnett, Kristinn Andersen, Alvin M. Strass (1995 Weld modeling and control sing artificial neral networs. IEEE Transactions on Indstry Applications 31(6:1484-1491. 4. Chen S.B., W L., Wang Q.L., Li Y.C. (1997 Self-learning fzzy neral networ and compter vision for control of plsed GTAW. Welding Jornal 76(5:01s-09s. 5. Y M. Zhang, Radovan Kovacevic (1998 Nerofzzy model-based predictive control of weld fsion zone geometry. IEEE Transactions on Fzzy Systems 6(3:389-401. 6. Zhang G.J., Chen S.B., W L. (005 Intelligent control of plsed GTAW with filter metal. Welding Jornal 84(1:9s-16s. 7. Zhongsheng Ho, Wenh Hang (1997 The model-free learning adaptive control of a class of SISO nonlinear systems. Proceedings of The American Control Conference 343-344. 8. Zhi-Gang Han, Xingho Y (004 An adaptive model free control design and its applications. Indstrial Informatics, 004.INDIN 04. 004 nd IEEE International Conference on 43-47. 9. Li Yanjn, Zhang Ke (005 Xitong bianshi liln ji yingyong. Gangfang Gongye Ch Ban She.