CHALMERS, GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET. EXAM for DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS. COURSE CODES: TIF 155, FIM770GU, PhD

Similar documents
CHALMERS, GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET. EXAM for DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS. COURSE CODES: TIF 155, FIM770GU, PhD

CHALMERS, GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET. EXAM for DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS. COURSE CODES: TIF 155, FIM770GU, PhD

CHALMERS, GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET. EXAM for DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS. COURSE CODES: TIF 155, FIM770GU, PhD

7 Two-dimensional bifurcations

CHALMERS, GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET. EXAM for COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY A. COURSE CODES: FFR 110, FIM740GU, PhD

MATH 415, WEEK 11: Bifurcations in Multiple Dimensions, Hopf Bifurcation

Practice Problems for Final Exam

TWO DIMENSIONAL FLOWS. Lecture 5: Limit Cycles and Bifurcations

Part II. Dynamical Systems. Year

1. < 0: the eigenvalues are real and have opposite signs; the fixed point is a saddle point

2 Discrete growth models, logistic map (Murray, Chapter 2)

B5.6 Nonlinear Systems

Mathematical Foundations of Neuroscience - Lecture 7. Bifurcations II.

PHY411 Lecture notes Part 4

B5.6 Nonlinear Systems

Chapter 1 Bifurcations and Chaos in Dynamical Systems

11 Chaos in Continuous Dynamical Systems.

THREE DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS. Lecture 6: The Lorenz Equations

Non-Linear Dynamics Homework Solutions Week 6

Edward Lorenz. Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Models Involving Interactions between Predator and Prey Populations

Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos

= F ( x; µ) (1) where x is a 2-dimensional vector, µ is a parameter, and F :

Lesson 4: Non-fading Memory Nonlinearities

STABILITY. Phase portraits and local stability

Nonlinear dynamics & chaos BECS

Continuous Threshold Policy Harvesting in Predator-Prey Models

Entrance Exam, Differential Equations April, (Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems) y + 2y + y cos(x 2 y) = 0, y(0) = 2, y (0) = 4.

PHY411 Lecture notes Part 5

One Dimensional Dynamical Systems

Bifurcation of Fixed Points

Problem Set Number 5, j/2.036j MIT (Fall 2014)

8 Example 1: The van der Pol oscillator (Strogatz Chapter 7)

Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos

Homework 2 Modeling complex systems, Stability analysis, Discrete-time dynamical systems, Deterministic chaos

Complex Dynamic Systems: Qualitative vs Quantitative analysis

Application demonstration. BifTools. Maple Package for Bifurcation Analysis in Dynamical Systems

APPPHYS217 Tuesday 25 May 2010

Chapter 3. Gumowski-Mira Map. 3.1 Introduction

EE222 - Spring 16 - Lecture 2 Notes 1

Example of a Blue Sky Catastrophe

LECTURE 8: DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS 7

Chapter 7. Nonlinear Systems. 7.1 Introduction

6.2 Brief review of fundamental concepts about chaotic systems

Boulder School for Condensed Matter and Materials Physics. Laurette Tuckerman PMMH-ESPCI-CNRS

Dynamical Systems and Chaos Part I: Theoretical Techniques. Lecture 4: Discrete systems + Chaos. Ilya Potapov Mathematics Department, TUT Room TD325

Stability of Dynamical systems

2.10 Saddles, Nodes, Foci and Centers

Chaos. Lendert Gelens. KU Leuven - Vrije Universiteit Brussel Nonlinear dynamics course - VUB

Solutions to Dynamical Systems 2010 exam. Each question is worth 25 marks.

BIFURCATION PHENOMENA Lecture 1: Qualitative theory of planar ODEs

Half of Final Exam Name: Practice Problems October 28, 2014

Mathematical Modeling I

A Novel Three Dimension Autonomous Chaotic System with a Quadratic Exponential Nonlinear Term

Dynamical systems tutorial. Gregor Schöner, INI, RUB

Lecture 38. Almost Linear Systems

Solutions for B8b (Nonlinear Systems) Fake Past Exam (TT 10)

+ i. cos(t) + 2 sin(t) + c 2.

arxiv: v1 [physics.class-ph] 5 Jan 2012

Introduction to bifurcations

Math 4200, Problem set 3

Problem Set Number 2, j/2.036j MIT (Fall 2014)

MATH 415, WEEK 12 & 13: Higher-Dimensional Systems, Lorenz Equations, Chaotic Behavior

Problem set 7 Math 207A, Fall 2011 Solutions

Lecture 6. Lorenz equations and Malkus' waterwheel Some properties of the Lorenz Eq.'s Lorenz Map Towards definitions of:

Limit Cycles II. Prof. Ned Wingreen MOL 410/510. How to prove a closed orbit exists?

MATH 614 Dynamical Systems and Chaos Lecture 24: Bifurcation theory in higher dimensions. The Hopf bifurcation.

Math 3301 Homework Set Points ( ) ( ) I ll leave it to you to verify that the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for this matrix are, ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

Math 331 Homework Assignment Chapter 7 Page 1 of 9

NBA Lecture 1. Simplest bifurcations in n-dimensional ODEs. Yu.A. Kuznetsov (Utrecht University, NL) March 14, 2011

MATH 215/255 Solutions to Additional Practice Problems April dy dt

Lecture 5. Outline: Limit Cycles. Definition and examples How to rule out limit cycles. Poincare-Bendixson theorem Hopf bifurcations Poincare maps

Classification of Phase Portraits at Equilibria for u (t) = f( u(t))

Research Article Hopf Bifurcation Analysis and Anticontrol of Hopf Circles of the Rössler-Like System

One dimensional Maps

Simplest Chaotic Flows with Involutional Symmetries

TWELVE LIMIT CYCLES IN A CUBIC ORDER PLANAR SYSTEM WITH Z 2 -SYMMETRY. P. Yu 1,2 and M. Han 1

Modelling in Biology

Computational Neuroscience. Session 4-2

154 Chapter 9 Hints, Answers, and Solutions The particular trajectories are highlighted in the phase portraits below.

BIFURCATION PHENOMENA Lecture 4: Bifurcations in n-dimensional ODEs

Chaotic motion. Phys 750 Lecture 9

APPM 2360: Final Exam 10:30am 1:00pm, May 6, 2015.

Math 216 First Midterm 19 October, 2017

Physics: spring-mass system, planet motion, pendulum. Biology: ecology problem, neural conduction, epidemics

UNIVERSITY of LIMERICK

Calculus and Differential Equations II

Lecture 3 : Bifurcation Analysis

A plane autonomous system is a pair of simultaneous first-order differential equations,

Fundamentals of Dynamical Systems / Discrete-Time Models. Dr. Dylan McNamara people.uncw.edu/ mcnamarad

Poincaré Map, Floquet Theory, and Stability of Periodic Orbits

Finding numerically Newhouse sinks near a homoclinic tangency and investigation of their chaotic transients. Takayuki Yamaguchi

Summary of topics relevant for the final. p. 1

MA 527 first midterm review problems Hopefully final version as of October 2nd

Numerical techniques: Deterministic Dynamical Systems

Bifurcation Analysis of Neuronal Bursters Models

DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS WITH A CODIMENSION-ONE INVARIANT MANIFOLD: THE UNFOLDINGS AND ITS BIFURCATIONS

Dynamics and Bifurcations in Predator-Prey Models with Refuge, Dispersal and Threshold Harvesting

Introduction to Dynamical Systems Basic Concepts of Dynamics

Homework for Math , Spring 2016

Transcription:

CHALMERS, GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET EXAM for DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS COURSE CODES: TIF 155, FIM770GU, PhD Time: Place: Teachers: Allowed material: Not allowed: January 14, 2019, at 08 30 12 30 Johanneberg Kristian Gustafsson, 070-050 2211 (mobile), visits once around 10 00 Mathematics Handbook for Science and Engineering any other written material, calculator Maximum score on this exam: 12 points (need 5 points to pass). Maximum score for homework problems: 24 points (need 10 points to pass). CTH 18 passed; 26 grade 4; 31 grade 5, GU 18 grade G; 28 grade VG. 1. Multiple choice questions [2 points] For each of the following questions identify all the correct alternatives A E. Answer with letters among A E. Some questions may have more than one correct alternative. In these cases answer with all appropriate letters among A E. a) Classify the fixed point of the two-dimensional dynamical system: ( ) 3 4 ẋ = Ax, where A =. 4 2 A. It is a saddle point. B. It is a stable spiral. C. It is an unstable spiral. D. It is a stable node. E. It is an unstable node. b) The normal forms of typical bifurcations for dynamical systems of dimensionality one are the following: Type saddle-node transcritical supercrit. pitchfork subcrit. pitchfork Normal form ẋ = r + x 2 ẋ = rx x 2 ẋ = rx x 3 ẋ = rx + x 3 How does the stability time of the fixed points close to a subcritical pitchfork bifurcation scale with the bifurcation parameter r? A. 1 r B. 1 r C. 1 D. r E. r 1 (10)

c) Which type(s) of bifurcation(s) does the system ẋ = 5 re x2 have? A. Saddle-node bifurcation B. Transcritical bifurcation C. Supercritical pitchfork bifurcation D. Subcritical pitchfork bifurcation E. No bifurcation occurs d) Each path A E in the -τ diagram below ( and τ are the determinant and trace of the stability matrix of dimensionality two) is obtained from τ and of a fixed point upon increasing a parameter. C B A D E Which of the paths corresponds to one of the fixed points in a normal form of the saddle-node bifurcation in dimensionality two? A. B. C. D. E. e) The figure below shows the phase portrait of the system: ẋ = y 3 ẏ = x y x What is the index of the fixed point at the origin? A. -2 B. -1 C. 0 D. 1 E. 2 2 (10)

f) Which properties hold in general for the Lyapunov exponents in a continuous dynamical system of dimensionality three with a strange attractor that is globally attracting? A. One Lyapunov exponent is negative B. One Lyapunov exponent is zero C. One Lyapunov exponent is positive D. The sum of all Lyapunov exponents is negative E. The sum of all Lyapunov exponents is zero 2. Short questions [2 points] For each of the following questions give a concise answer within a few lines per question. a) Write down the equations for a Hamiltonian dynamical system of your choice. For example, starting from Newton s second law of motion, F = mẍ, we have the Hamiltonian system ẋ = p m, ṗ = F b) What is meant by a catastrophe in the context of bifurcation theory? A catastrophe is a sudden change in the state of the system as a parameter is changed. For example, after a saddle-node bifurcation or a subcritical pitchfork bifurcation, the system quickly shifts to a distant attractor. c) Explain what the difference between a global and a local bifurcation is. Give two examples of global bifurcations. Bifurcations of cycles, infinite-period bifurcation, bifurcation of heteroclinic trajectories, bifurcation of homoclinic orbit,... d) Explain what is meant by a secular term in perturbation theory. When performing perturbation theory in a small parameter ɛ in a timedependent problem, it is common that the perturbation coefficients in ɛ grow without bound as t. Such terms growing without bound are denoted secular terms. e) What value does the maximal Lyapunov exponent of a stable limit cycle take? Explain why. The maximal Lyapunov exponent is zero. 3 (10) For a stable limit cycle

closeby trajectories are attracted, meaning all Lyapunov exponents are negative, except for the Lyapunov exponent along the cycle which must be zero due to periodicity (separations can neither grow nor shrink in the long run because after one revolution of the limit cycle, the separation is back to the original length). f) Explain why the transition from regular dynamics to chaos is typically very different in dissipative and in Hamiltonian dynamical systems. In dissipative systems the transitions usually occurs though a sequence of bifurcations of where attractors becomes unstable. In Hamiltonian systems there are no attractors and the thransition instead occurs in bifurcations where closed orbits break up. 3. Imperfect bifurcations [2.5 points] Consider the system ẋ = 2(4 + a + 3r) + (12 + a + 5r)x + (6 + r)x 2 + x 3 (1) where r and a are real parameters. a) The system (1) has one fixed point x which is independent of the parameters a and b. Find the value of this fixed point. Since one fixed point is independent of the parameters we can set the parameters to any value, for instance a = 3r 4 (removes the constant term) and furthermore r = 4 (removes the linear term), to obtain ẋ = 2x 2 + x 3 Solving this flow equal zero gives x = 2 and x = 0. Inserting these values in the original system, we find that x = 2 is a fixed point for all parameter values. b) Find and classify all bifurcations that occur in the system (1) when a = 0. Sketch the bifurcation diagram. Hint: It may be helpful to know that the shifted coordinate ξ = x +x, where x is the parameter-independent fixed point in subtask a), has the following dynamics ξ = (a + r)ξ + rξ 2 + ξ 3. The shifted system has fixed points at ξ 1 = 0, ξ 2 = 1 2 ( r ) r 2 4a 4r, ξ3 = 1 ( r + ) r 2 2 4a 4r. When a = 0 we have three fixed points if r < 0 or if r > 4, otherwise we have one fixed point. 4 (10)

For the case r = 0, we have a triple root: ξ 1 = ξ 2 = ξ 3 = 0. For the case r = 4, we have a double root: ξ 2 = ξ 3 = 2. Since the number of fixed points changes, we can conclude that we have a pitchfork bifurcation between all three fixed points at r c = 0 and a saddle-node bifurcation between ξ 2 and ξ 3 at r c = 4. Differentiating the shifted flow with respect to ξ gives ξ ξ = a + r + 2rξ + 3ξ2. ξ 1 is stable when r < a and unstable for r > a. As a consequence, the pitchfork bifurcation at a = 0 is subcritical and the upper branch of the saddle-node bifurcation is stable. Sketching the bifurcation diagram (asymptotes x 1 r and x 1) verifies that the system has no other bifurcations (the corresponding bifurcation diagram for x is simply shifted by 2): c) Find and classify all bifurcations that occur in the system (1) when a = 1. Sketch the bifurcation diagram. When a = 1 the fixed points are located at ξ1 = 0, ξ2 = 1 2 ( r r 2 ), ξ 3 = 1 ( r + r 2 ). 2 Equivalently, we can reorder the second and third fixed points at r = 2 to obtain Sketch the bifurcation diagram: ξ 1 = 0, ξ 2 = 1 r, ξ 3 = 1. 5 (10)

We find that the system has two transcritical bifurcations, one at r c = 1 and one at r c = 2. 4. Linear stability analysis and phase portrait [1.5 points] Consider the following dynamical system where 0 a 1 is a real parameter. ẋ = ax 2 xy ẏ = y + x 2 (2) a) Identify all fixed points of the system (2) and classify them according to linear stability analysis for the parameter range 0 a 1. Fixed points: (x 1, y1) = (0, 0) and (x 1, y1) = (a, a 2 ). Jacobian matrix ( ) 2ax y x J(x, y) = 2x 1 ( ) 0 0 J(x 1, y1) = 0 1 tr J(x 1, y 1) = 1 det J(x 1, y1) = 0 ( ) a J(x 2, y2) 2 a = 2a 1 tr J(x 2, y 2) = a 2 1 det J(x 2, y 2) = a 2 According to linear stability analysis, the first fixed point is stable in the y-direction and marginally stable in the x-direction (in a linear system we would have had a line of stable fixed points). For the second fixed point, the discriminant (a 2 1) 2 4a 2 has a relevant zero when a 2 = 3 8, i.e. when a = 2 1. According to linear stability analysis, the second fixed point is therefore a center if a = 1, a stable spiral if 2 1 < a < 1, a stable degenerate node if a = 2 1 (J(x 2, y 2) is not multiple of the unit matrix), a stable node if 0 < a < 2 1 and the system only has one fixed point when a = 0. 6 (10)

b) Using the nullclines as a guide, sketch the phase portrait of the system (2) for the case a = 0. Describe in words how trajectories behave close to the fixed point. When a = 0, the nullclines corresponding to ẋ = 0 are x = 0 and y = 0 and the nullclines corresponding to ẏ = 0 are y = x 2 : When y < 0 then sign(ẋ) = sign(x) and ẏ > 0, i.e. all trajectories with x 0 will cross the line y = 0 trajectories, moving away from the fixed point in the x-direction. When y > 0 then sign(ẋ) = sign(x) and all trajectories will eventually get arbitrarily close to the fixed point. In conclusion, the fixed point is globally attracting, but all trajectories approach it from positive values of y. 5. Hopf bifurcation [2 points] Consider the following dynamical system where µ is a real parameter. ẋ = y ẏ = x + µy x 2 y 2y 3 (3) a) Show that the system (3) undergoes a Hopf bifurcation as µ passes zero. The system has a single fixed point at the origin. The Jacobian evaluated at the origin becomes J = tr J = µ det J = 1. ( 0 1 2) 1 2xy µ x 2 6y x=y=0 = ( 0 ) 1 1 µ The corresponding eigenvalues λ ± = (µ ± µ 2 4)/2 passes from negative to positive real part with a non-zero imaginary part as µ passes zero. Thus, we have a Hopf bifurcation when µ passes zero. 7 (10)

b) Consider the case µ = 0 in the system (3) and classify the fixed point at the origin. When µ = 0 linear stability analysis implies that the fixed point at the origin is a center. However, non-linear terms may destroy the center and to classify the fixed point we must consider the effect of the nonlinear terms. Consider the time evolution of the radial coordinate r = x2 + y 2 : ṙ = xẋ + yẏ r = xy + y( x + µy x2 y 2y 3 ) r = y2 r (µ x2 2y 2 ). When µ = 0, we have ṙ < 0 for any non-zero values of r. Consequently, the origin is a stable spiral. c) Consider the case µ = 1. Using the Poincaré-Bendixon theorem, show that the system (3) has at least one closed orbit. Consider once again the time evolution of the radial coordinate r = x2 + y 2, now with µ = 1: ṙ = y2 r (1 x2 2y 2 ). First, rewriting ṙ = y2 (1 r r2 y 2 ) and let r = 1 gives ṙ = y4 0 r at r = 1. Second, rewriting ṙ = y2 (1 + r x2 2r 2 ) and let r = 1 2 gives ṙ = x2 y 2 0 at r = 1 r 2. Thus, no trajectory starting within 1/ 2 r 1 can leave this region (a trapping region) and since there are no fixed points in the region, the Poincaré-Bendixon theorem gives that we must have at least one closed orbit in the region. 8 (10)

6. Fractal dimension of a weighted Cantor set [2 points] The generalized fractal dimension D q is defined by with D q 1 1 q lim ln I(q, ɛ) ɛ 0 ln(1/ɛ) I(q, ɛ) = N box k=1 p q k (ɛ). Here p k is the probability to be in the k:th occupied box (box with p k 0) and N box is the total number of occupied boxes. Consider a set S n where n labels the generation. Start with S 0 being the unit interval. S n is obtained by dividing each interval in the set S n 1 into two subintervals. Upon each division, allocate a fraction α (assume 0 α 1) of the probability to be in the original interval to the left subinterval, and a fraction 1 α to the right subinterval. The figure below illustrates the first few generations S 0, S 1, S 2 and S 3 : p = 1 p = α p = 1 α p = α 2 p = α(1 α) p = α(1 α) p = (1 α) 2 The probability to be in different intervals is displayed in the text below the intervals. The height of an interval illustrates the relative probability to be in that interval for the case α = 2/3. In what follows, consider the fractal dimension of the set S obtained by iterating n. a) Evaluate the generalized fractal dimension D q of S for the case α = 1. When α = 1, the leftmost interval has all probability at each generation. The set becomes a single point with fractal dimension D q = 0. b) Evaluate the generalized fractal dimension D q of S for the case α = 1 2. When α = 1, all intervals have equal probability at each generation. 2 Hence S n is equivalent to the unit interval at any generation and the fractal dimension becomes D q = 1. 9 (10)

c) Evaluate the box-counting dimension D 0 of S for 0 < α < 1. Since all intervals have non-zero probability when 0 < α < 1, the box counting dimension that does not take into account of the probability to be at different intervals, must be equal to unity, i.e. D 0 = 1 for 0 < α < 1. d) Evaluate the generalized fractal dimension D q of S for general values of α. Hint: To verify your result, you can check that the results in subtasks a), b) and c) come out correctly and that your result is symmetric upon replacing α 1 α. Consider intervals of length ɛ = 2 n at generation n. At each iteration, subintervals takes either takes probability α times previous probability, or 1 α times previous probability. It follows that there will be ( ) n m intervals having the probability α m (1 α) n m with m = 0,..., n. We use this information to evaluate I(q, ɛ) = We obtain N box k=1 p q k (ɛ) = n m=0 ( ) n [α q ] m [(1 α) q ] n m = (α q + (1 α) q ) n. m D q 1 1 q lim ln I(q, ɛ) ɛ 0 ln(1/ɛ) = 1 1 q lim ln [(α q + (1 α) q ) n ] n ln(2 n ) Consistency check when α = 0: Consistency check when α = 1/2: D q = 1 ln [2 q + 2 q ] 1 q ln 2 D q = 1 ln 1 1 q ln 2 = 0 = 1 ln [2 1 q ] 1 q ln 2 Consistency check for q = 0 and 0 < α < 1: = ln 2 ln 2 = 1 = 1 ln [α q + (1 α) q ]. 1 q ln 2 D q = ln [1 + 1] ln 2 = 1. 10 (10)