The Banach Tarski Paradox and Amenability Lecture 20: Invariant Mean implies Reiter s Property. 11 October 2012

Similar documents
The Banach Tarski Paradox and Amenability Lecture 19: Reiter s Property and the Følner Condition. 6 October 2011

The Banach Tarski Paradox and Amenability Lecture 23: Unitary Representations and Amenability. 23 October 2012

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: WEAK AND WEAK* CONVERGENCE

A CHARACTERIZATION OF RELATIVE KAZHDAN PROPERTY T FOR SEMIDIRECT PRODUCTS WITH ABELIAN GROUPS

Overview of normed linear spaces

Functional Analysis HW #1

Chapter 14. Duality for Normed Linear Spaces

Continuity of convex functions in normed spaces

Recall that if X is a compact metric space, C(X), the space of continuous (real-valued) functions on X, is a Banach space with the norm

Introduction to Functional Analysis

1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer 11(2) (1989),

Reflexivity of Locally Convex Spaces over Local Fields

3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?

1.3.1 Definition and Basic Properties of Convolution

2 (Bonus). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?

THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515

It follows from the above inequalities that for c C 1

Problem Set 6: Solutions Math 201A: Fall a n x n,

An introduction to random walks on groups

ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2016: SOLUTIONS. = lim. F n

Continuity of convolution and SIN groups

Weak Topologies, Reflexivity, Adjoint operators

MAT 578 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS EXERCISES

l(y j ) = 0 for all y j (1)

(convex combination!). Use convexity of f and multiply by the common denominator to get. Interchanging the role of x and y, we obtain that f is ( 2M ε

GENERALIZED FUNCTIONS LECTURES. Contents

Notions such as convergent sequence and Cauchy sequence make sense for any metric space. Convergent Sequences are Cauchy

PCMI LECTURE NOTES ON PROPERTY (T ), EXPANDER GRAPHS AND APPROXIMATE GROUPS (PRELIMINARY VERSION)

MAT 449 : Problem Set 4

Notes for Functional Analysis

Normed Vector Spaces and Double Duals

THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 516

Spring -07 TOPOLOGY III. Conventions

Functional Analysis Exercise Class

Banach Spaces V: A Closer Look at the w- and the w -Topologies

It follows from the above inequalities that for c C 1

Notes for Functional Analysis

E.7 Alaoglu s Theorem

Functional Analysis Exercise Class

Combinatorics in Banach space theory Lecture 12

PROBLEMS. (b) (Polarization Identity) Show that in any inner product space

Reminder Notes for the Course on Distribution Theory

UNIFORM EMBEDDINGS OF BOUNDED GEOMETRY SPACES INTO REFLEXIVE BANACH SPACE

2.2 Annihilators, complemented subspaces

C.6 Adjoints for Operators on Hilbert Spaces

A NOTE ON COMPARISON BETWEEN BIRKHOFF AND MCSHANE-TYPE INTEGRALS FOR MULTIFUNCTIONS

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...

FURTHER STUDIES OF STRONGLY AMENABLE -REPRESENTATIONS OF LAU -ALGEBRAS

AMENABLE ACTIONS AND ALMOST INVARIANT SETS

Tools from Lebesgue integration

Five Mini-Courses on Analysis

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall F(x) = 1 x. f(t)dt. t 1 2. tf 2 (t)dt. and g(t, x) = 2 t. 2 t

Amenable groups, Jacques Tits Alternative Theorem

Dual Space of L 1. C = {E P(I) : one of E or I \ E is countable}.

Sobolev spaces. May 18

On the topology of pointwise convergence on the boundaries of L 1 -preduals. Warren B. Moors

Notes on Distributions

Spectral theory for compact operators on Banach spaces

ON SUBSPACES OF NON-REFLEXIVE ORLICZ SPACES

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 28 Oct 2016

Measurable functions are approximately nice, even if look terrible.

Functional Analysis I

7 Complete metric spaces and function spaces

Errata Applied Analysis

MATH MEASURE THEORY AND FOURIER ANALYSIS. Contents

2. Function spaces and approximation

MH 7500 THEOREMS. (iii) A = A; (iv) A B = A B. Theorem 5. If {A α : α Λ} is any collection of subsets of a space X, then

MATH 113 SPRING 2015

6.2 Fubini s Theorem. (µ ν)(c) = f C (x) dµ(x). (6.2) Proof. Note that (X Y, A B, µ ν) must be σ-finite as well, so that.

Linear Topological Spaces

(c) For each α R \ {0}, the mapping x αx is a homeomorphism of X.

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: COMPACT SETS AND FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SPACES. 1. Compact Sets

A SHORT INTRODUCTION TO BANACH LATTICES AND

Part V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall 2008

Analysis III Theorems, Propositions & Lemmas... Oh My!

Notes for Functional Analysis

The Bishop-Phelps-Bollobás property for operators

Aliprantis, Border: Infinite-dimensional Analysis A Hitchhiker s Guide

A spectral gap property for subgroups of finite covolume in Lie groups

Finite products sets and minimally almost periodic groups

ON VECTOR-VALUED INEQUALITIES FOR SIDON SETS AND SETS OF INTERPOLATION

3. (a) What is a simple function? What is an integrable function? How is f dµ defined? Define it first

4 Countability axioms

Applied Analysis (APPM 5440): Final exam 1:30pm 4:00pm, Dec. 14, Closed books.

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS HAHN-BANACH THEOREM. F (m 2 ) + α m 2 + x 0

MATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, Introduction

Lattice algebra representations of L 1 (G) on translation invariant Banach function spaces

COARSELY EMBEDDABLE METRIC SPACES WITHOUT PROPERTY A

Functional Analysis HW #3

MAT 771 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS HOMEWORK 3. (1) Let V be the vector space of all bounded or unbounded sequences of complex numbers.

TD 1: Hilbert Spaces and Applications

1 Inner Product Space

Functional Analysis, Stein-Shakarchi Chapter 1

Commutative Banach algebras 79

CONTENTS. 4 Hausdorff Measure Introduction The Cantor Set Rectifiable Curves Cantor Set-Like Objects...

MAT 449 : Problem Set 7

OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS. Lecture 3. Stéphane ATTAL

4 Hilbert spaces. The proof of the Hilbert basis theorem is not mathematics, it is theology. Camille Jordan

Fall f(x)g(x) dx. The starting place for the theory of Fourier series is that the family of functions {e inx } n= is orthonormal, that is

Transcription:

The Banach Tarski Paradox and Amenability Lecture 20: Invariant Mean implies Reiter s Property 11 October 2012

Invariant means and amenability Definition Let be a locally compact group. An invariant mean is a linear functional m : L () R such that: 1. m(f ) 0 if f 0 2. m(χ ) = 1 3. m(g f ) = m(f ) for all g and f L () Definition A locally compact group is amenable if it admits an invariant mean.

Invariant mean implies Følner Today we will finish proving: Theorem (Følner, reenleaf) Let be a locally compact group. Then admits an invariant mean if and only if satisfies the Følner Condition. In Lecture 18 we showed: satisfies the Følner Condition = admits an invariant mean and in Lecture 19 we defined a property of locally compact groups called the Reiter Property and showed: satisfies the Reiter Property = satisfies the Følner Condition So today we will show (most of) admits an invariant mean = satisfies the Reiter Property

The spaces L p () and L () Let be a locally compact group with Haar measure µ. Let 1 p <. Recall L p () := { f : R f is measurable and } f p dµ < L p () := L p ()/{measurable functions f = 0 µ a.e.} Then L p () is a normed linear space with norm (by abuse of notation) ( ) 1/p f p = f p dµ In particular, L 1 () is the space of (equivalence classes of) integrable functions on. Recall the dual space L () := { bounded linear functionals on L () } This is also a normed linear space, with the operator norm.

Continuity of the left regular representation For 1 p the group acts on L p () via g f (x) = f (g 1 x) g, f L p () and x It is an exercise to show: Lemma Let f L p (). The mapping g g f from L p () is continuous if 1 p <. This mapping is not necessarily continuous for p =. Definition Let UCB() be the subspace of L () given by UCB() = {f L () g g f is continuous} The action on L () preserves UCB(). If is compact or discrete, then L () = UCB().

Means on L () and UCB() Definition Let be a locally compact group. An mean on L () is a linear functional m : L () R such that: 1. m(ϕ) 0 if ϕ 0 2. m(χ ) = 1 Similarly we can define a mean on UCB().

Means on L () and L 1 () We proved in Lecture 19: Lemma Let M be the set of all means on L (). Then M is a subset of the unit ball in L (). That is, a mean is a bounded linear functional of norm at most 1. Lemma If f L 1 () and ϕ L () then f ϕ L 1 (). Corollary There is an isometric embedding L 1 () L (), so we may regard L 1 () as a subspace of L (). The embedding is f λ f where for ϕ L () λ f (ϕ) = f ϕ dµ

The set L 1 () 1,+ In Lecture 19 we also defined a subset of L 1 () whose image in L () consists of means by L 1 () 1,+ = {f L 1 () : f 1 = 1 and f 0} Lemma Every f L 1 () 1,+ defines a mean m f : L () R via: m f (ϕ) := f ϕ dµ

Density of L 1 () 1,+ in M Lemma The image of L 1 () 1,+ is weak dense in M. Let m M L (). By definition of the weak topology on L (), we need to show that there is a sequence {f i } i in L 1 () 1,+ so that for all ϕ L () m fi (ϕ) m(ϕ) Use: Theorem (Hahn Banach) Let M be a linear subspace of a Banach space X and let x 0 X. Then x 0 is in M (the closure of M) if and only if there does not exist f X such that f (x) = 0 for all x M but f (x 0 ) 0.

Reiter s Property The group acts on L 1 () 1,+ via g f (x) = f (g 1 x) g, f L 1 () 1,+ and x Definition A locally compact group satisfies Reiter s Property if for every every ε > 0 and every compact subset K of, there is an f L 1 () 1,+ such that for all k K k f f 1 ε Today we ll prove: Theorem (Hulanicki 1965, Reiter 1966) Let be a locally compact group. If admits an invariant mean then satisfies Reiter s Property. using the proof in Bekka de la Harpe Valette.

Properties of the set L 1 () 1,+ Lemma L 1 () 1,+ is a convex subset of L 1 (). Proof. If f, g L 1 () 1,+ and t [0, 1] then tf + (1 t)g 0 and tf + (1 t)g 1 = tf + (1 t)g dµ = tf + (1 t)g dµ = t f dµ + (1 t) g dµ = t f 1 + (1 t) g 1 = 1 so tf + (1 t)g L 1 () 1,+ as required for convexity.

Properties of the set L 1 () 1,+ Lemma L 1 () 1,+ is closed under convolution, where (f g)(x) := f (y)g(y 1 x) dµ(y) for all f, g L 1 () 1,+ and x. Proof. We have f g 0. By Fubini s Theorem, since f and g are integrable ( ) ( ) f g dµ = f dµ g dµ hence f g 1 = f 1 g 1 = 1

Properties of the set L 1 () 1,+ Definition Let UCB() be the subspace of L () given by UCB() = {f L () g g f is continuous} Lemma If f L 1 () 1,+ and ϕ L () then f ϕ = f (y)(y ϕ) dµ(y) is in UCB(). Proof. Exercise.

Invariant mean implies Reiter Property Suppose admits an invariant mean m on L (). Then m restricts to an invariant mean on UCB(). Lemma For all f L 1 () 1,+ and all ϕ UCB(), m(f ϕ) = m(ϕ) Assuming the lemma, let {f i } i be a sequence in L 1 () 1,+ such that supp(f i ) {e}. Then for all ϕ L () and f L 1 () 1,+ lim i f f i ϕ f ϕ = 0 so since means are continuous and by the result of the lemma m(f ϕ) = lim i m(f f i ϕ) = lim i m(f i ϕ) Thus for all ϕ L () and all f, f L 1 () 1,+ m(f ϕ) = m(f ϕ) (1)

Invariant mean implies Reiter Property We have m : UCB() R an invariant mean. Fix a function f 0 L 1 () 1,+. Define a mean m on L () by m(ϕ) = m(f 0 ϕ) Then m(ϕ) 0 if ϕ 0 and m(χ ) = m(f 0 χ ) = m(χ ) = 1 by the lemma. For all f L 1 () 1,+ and ϕ L () we have by (1) m(f ϕ) = m(f 0 f ϕ) = m(f 0 ϕ) = m(ϕ). That is, m is a topological invariant mean on L (), meaning that m is a mean so that for all f L 1 () 1,+ and ϕ L () m(f ϕ) = m(ϕ).

Invariant mean implies Reiter Property Since L 1 () 1,+ is weak dense in the set of all means on L (), there exists a sequence {f i } in L 1 () 1,+ converging to m in the weak topology. That is, for all ϕ L (), m fi (ϕ) m(ϕ) Let f L 1 () 1,+. From the definition of convolution we get for all ϕ L (), m f fi (ϕ) = m fi (f ϕ) thus as m is a topological invariant mean m (f fi f )(ϕ) = m f fi (ϕ) m fi (ϕ) m(f ϕ) m(ϕ) = 0 In other words, (f f i f i ) converges to 0 in the weak topology on L 1 (), where we consider L 1 () as a subspace of L ().

Invariant mean implies Reiter Property Consider E = f L 1 () 1,+ L 1 () Since the set L 1 () 1,+ is convex, the set E is locally convex. Define Σ = {(f g g) f L 1 () 1,+ : g L 1 () 1,+ } E The set Σ is convex (check), and since (f f i f i ) 0 in the weak topology on each L 1 (), the closure of Σ in the weak topology on E (which is just the product of the weak topologies on each L 1 ()) contains 0. Since E is locally convex and Σ is convex, the closure of Σ in the weak topology is the same as the closure of Σ in the product of the norm topologies. So there exists a sequence {g j } j in L 1 () 1,+ such that for all f L 1 () 1,+ lim j f g j g j 1 = 0

Invariant mean implies Reiter Property There exists a sequence {g j } j in L 1 () 1,+ such that for all f L 1 () 1,+ lim j f g j g j 1 = 0 (2) Since each g j has bounded norm, this holds uniformly for f in compact (w.r.t. norm) subsets of L 1 (). Let Q be a compact neighbourhood of e. Let ε > 0. Fix f L 1 () 1,+. Since the map g g f is continuous from to L 1 (), the set {q f q Q} is compact in L 1 (). So by Equation (2) holding uniformly on compact subsets, there exists j such that for all q Q (q f ) g j g j 1 < ε Put g = f g j. Note that q g = (q f ) g j. Then for all q Q (q g) g 1 (q f ) g j g j 1 + (f g j ) g j 1 < 2ε We have established the Reiter Property.