Solutions for Exercise session I

Similar documents
Correlation functions in optics; classical and quantum 2. TUW, Vienna, Austria, April 2018 Luis A. Orozco

Lasers & Holography. Ulrich Heintz Brown University. 4/5/2016 Ulrich Heintz - PHYS 1560 Lecture 10 1

Single photons. how to create them, how to see them. Alessandro Cerè

Lecture 9. PMTs and Laser Noise. Lecture 9. Photon Counting. Photomultiplier Tubes (PMTs) Laser Phase Noise. Relative Intensity

Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Single Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown and Twiss Photon Antibunching Setup

Laboratory 3&4: Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Single-Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup for Photon Antibunching

Laboratory 3: Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Single Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown, and Twiss Setup for Photon Antibunching

Single Photon detectors

Pulsed Lasers Revised: 2/12/14 15: , Henry Zmuda Set 5a Pulsed Lasers

Analytical Chemistry II

EE 472 Solutions to some chapter 4 problems

Signal regeneration - optical amplifiers

Quantum Electronics/Laser Physics Chapter 4 Line Shapes and Line Widths

Basics of Infrared Detection

Stimulated Emission. Electrons can absorb photons from medium. Accelerated electrons emit light to return their ground state

Quantum Optics and Quantum Information Laboratory

Lasers... the optical cavity

Experiment 3 1. The Michelson Interferometer and the He- Ne Laser Physics 2150 Experiment No. 3 University of Colorado

Quantum Electronics Laser Physics. Chapter 5. The Laser Amplifier

Unit-2 LASER. Syllabus: Properties of lasers, types of lasers, derivation of Einstein A & B Coefficients, Working He-Ne and Ruby lasers.

Detection of Single Photon Emission by Hanbury-Brown Twiss Interferometry

Radiation-matter interaction.

Quantum and Nano Optics Laboratory. Jacob Begis Lab partners: Josh Rose, Edward Pei

Supplementary Information: Three-dimensional quantum photonic elements based on single nitrogen vacancy-centres in laser-written microstructures

Chapter-4 Stimulated emission devices LASERS

Quantum Optics exam. M2 LOM and Nanophysique. 28 November 2017

EE485 Introduction to Photonics

OPTI 511R, Spring 2018 Problem Set 10 Prof. R.J. Jones Due Thursday, April 19

Visualization of Xe and Sn Atoms Generated from Laser-Produced Plasma for EUV Light Source

Squeezed Light for Gravitational Wave Interferometers

Contribution of the Hanbury Brown Twiss experiment to the development of quantum optics

Top Le# side TEST Right side bo.om

PHYSICS 359E: EXPERIMENT 2.2 THE MOSSBAUER EFFECT: RESONANT ABSORPTION OF (-RAYS

Single Semiconductor Nanostructures for Quantum Photonics Applications: A solid-state cavity-qed system with semiconductor quantum dots

Laserphysik. Prof. Yong Lei & Dr. Yang Xu. Fachgebiet Angewandte Nanophysik, Institut für Physik

Lasers and Electro-optics

The Hanbury Brown Twiss effect for matter waves. Chris Westbrook Laboratoire Charles Fabry, Palaiseau Workshop on HBT interferometry 12 may 2014

MEFT / Quantum Optics and Lasers. Suggested problems Set 4 Gonçalo Figueira, spring 2015

OPTI 511, Spring 2016 Problem Set 9 Prof. R. J. Jones

Laser Types Two main types depending on time operation Continuous Wave (CW) Pulsed operation Pulsed is easier, CW more useful

Chapter 17. λ 2 = 1.24 = 6200 Å. λ 2 cutoff at too short a wavelength λ 1 cutoff at to long a wavelength (increases bandwidth for noise reduces S/N).

January 2010, Maynooth. Photons. Myungshik Kim.

Testing The Existence of Single Photons

Lab 3-4 : Confocal Microscope Imaging of Single-Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury-Brown and Twiss Set Up, Photon Antibunching

What Makes a Laser Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation Main Requirements of the Laser Laser Gain Medium (provides the light

2. NOTES ON RADIATIVE TRANSFER The specific intensity I ν

Paper Review. Special Topics in Optical Engineering II (15/1) Minkyu Kim. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Feb 1985

Observation of the nonlinear phase shift due to single post-selected photons

and another with a peak frequency ω 2

LABORATORY OF ELEMENTARY BIOPHYSICS

Name :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B. Tech (New)/SEM-1/PH-101/ PHYSICS-I

ATOMIC AND LASER SPECTROSCOPY

Lab 3 and 4: Single Photon Source

Conditional Measurements in cavity QED. Luis A. Orozco Joint Quantum Institute Department of Physics

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON

Astronomy 203 practice final examination

Chapter 5. Semiconductor Laser

In Situ Imaging of Cold Atomic Gases

MEASURING THE LIFETIME OF THE MUON

Lasers PH 645/ OSE 645/ EE 613 Summer 2010 Section 1: T/Th 2:45-4:45 PM Engineering Building 240

ECE 565 Notes on Shot Noise, Photocurrent Statistics, and Integrate-and-Dump Receivers M. M. Hayat 3/17/05

QUESTION BANK IN PHYSICS

Ultrafast Dynamics and Single Particle Spectroscopy of Au-CdSe Nanorods

LAB 3: Confocal Microscope Imaging of single-emitter fluorescence. LAB 4: Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup. Photon antibunching. Roshita Ramkhalawon

Optical and Photonic Glasses. Lecture 31. Rare Earth Doped Glasses I. Professor Rui Almeida


Mossbauer Spectroscopy

Quantum op*cs. Chris Westbrook Antoine Browaeys

Quantum Mechanica. Peter van der Straten Universiteit Utrecht. Peter van der Straten (Atom Optics) Quantum Mechanica January 15, / 22

1 Longitudinal modes of a laser cavity

I. Short answer The responses below include suggestions (not exhaustive) of points you might have raised in answering the questions.

Laser Types Two main types depending on time operation Continuous Wave (CW) Pulsed operation Pulsed is easier, CW more useful

Labs 3-4: Single-photon Source

Quantum correlations and atomic speckle

Confocal Microscope Imaging of Single emitter fluorescence and Observing Photon Antibunching Using Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup. Lab.

Metal Vapour Lasers Use vapoured metal as a gain medium Developed by W. Silfvast (1966) Two types: Ionized Metal vapour (He-Cd) Neutral Metal vapour

Single-photon NV sources. Pauli Kehayias March 16, 2011

Second Sound. University of California, Santa Cruz. September 12, 2006

A few Experimental methods for optical spectroscopy Classical methods Modern methods. Remember class #1 Generating fast LASER pulses

Molecular spectroscopy

(b) Spontaneous emission. Absorption, spontaneous (random photon) emission and stimulated emission.

Luz e Átomos. como ferramentas para Informação. Quântica. Quântica Ótica. Marcelo Martinelli. Lab. de Manipulação Coerente de Átomos e Luz

Engineering Medical Optics BME136/251 Winter 2017

Exploring the quantum dynamics of atoms and photons in cavities. Serge Haroche, ENS and Collège de France, Paris

Single Emitter Detection with Fluorescence and Extinction Spectroscopy

Measuring Cosmic Ray Muon Decay Constant and Flux

Supplementary Figures

Lab Experimental observation of singleemitter fluorescence and photon anti-bunching

Dept. of Physics, MIT Manipal 1

Hong-Ou-Mandel effect with matter waves

Experiment objectives: measure the ratio of Planck s constant to the electron charge h/e using the photoelectric effect.

Detecting high energy photons. Interactions of photons with matter Properties of detectors (with examples)


THREE MAIN LIGHT MATTER INTERRACTION

Theory of optically thin emission line spectroscopy

Frequency and time... dispersion-cancellation, etc.

QPR No. 80 VIII. NOISE IN ELECTRON DEVICES. Academic and Research Staff. Prof. H. A. Haus Prof. P. Penfield, Jr. Prof. R. P. Rafuse.

pickup from external sources unwanted feedback RF interference from system or elsewhere, power supply fluctuations ground currents

Counting Photons to Calibrate a Photometer for Stellar Intensity Interferometry

Physics 214 Midterm Exam Spring Last Name: First Name NetID Discussion Section: Discussion TA Name:

Transcription:

Solutions for Exercise session I 1. The maximally polarisation-entangled photon state can be written as Ψ = 1 ( H 1 V V 1 H ). Show that the state is invariant (i.e. still maximally entangled) after a rotation of 45. Hint: Express Ψ in terms of diagonally polarised photon states. The definitions of polarised light states in +45 and -45 are P = 1 ( H + V ) and M = 1 ( H V ), respectively. Entangled state in H/V basis is: Ψ = 1 ( H 1 V V 1 H ) Using the definitions of plus and minus 45 degree polarised light we have: H = 1 ( P + M ) and V = 1 ( P M ). Replacing H and V in the expression of Ψ we get: Ψ = 1 ( 1 1 (( P 1 + M 1 ) ( P M ) ( P 1 M 1 ) ) ( P + M )) Multiplying out the tensor product: Ψ = 1 ( 1 ( P 1 P + M 1 P P 1 M M 1 M ) ( P 1 P M 1 P + P 1 M M 1 M )) Finally some terms will cancel and we arrive at Ψ in the ±45 basis: Ψ = 1 ( M 1 P P 1 M ) The state is still entangled in this basis and shows the same correlations.. Exercise 4.13 form course book Quantum Optics. A helium-neon laser consists of a laser tube of length 0.3 m with mirrors bonded to the end of the tube. The output coupler has a reflectivity of 99%. The laser operates on the 63.8 nm transition of neon (relative atomic mass 1

0.18), which has an Einstein A coefficient of 3.4 10 6 s 1. The tube runs at 00 C and the laser transition is Doppler- broadened. On the assumption that the only loss in the cavity is through the output coupler, that the average refractive index is equal to unity, and that the laser operates at the line center, calculate: (a) the gain coefficient in the laser tube; (b) the population inversion density. (a) R = 0.99; L = 0.3 m; λ = 3.8 nm; A = 3.4 10 6 s 1 ; T = 00 C= 473 K; m = 0.18 1.67 10 7 kg. Laser oscillation equation: ( ) 1 R R 1 R ε e γl = 1 γ = ln, L where R 1 = 1 and ε = 1. The gain is hence γ = 0.017 m 1. (b) Equation for laser gain is: γ(ω) = λ N g(ω) 4 n τ setting n = 1 and τ = 1 we obtain for the population inversion A density: N = 4 γ. λ A g(ω) Line shape is given by Doppler broadening. At the line center g(ω) becomes: g(ω 0 ) = c λ m = 9.13 π c π k b T 10 11 (rad/s) 1. Finally we obtain for the population inversion density: N = 5.5 10 14 m 3. 3. Exercise 5.6 form course book Quantum Optics. (a) the mean photon number per pulse: The mean photon number ( n) per pulse is: n = E pulse, where E h ω pulse is the energy per pulse. E pulse = P N pulse, where P is the optical power and N pulse is the number of pulses per second. P P λ So we have, n = h ω N pulse = h π c N pulse = 4.0 10 7 (b) the standard deviation per pulse: The photon statistics of a laser is Poissonian, so n = n = 6.4 10 3.

4. Exercise 5.7 form course book Quantum Optics. The laser described in the previous question is attenuated by a factor 10 9. For the attenuated beam calculate: (a) the mean photon number per pulse: n = n old 10 9 = 0.04 (b) the the fraction of pulses containing one photon: From Poission distribution we have: P (1) = ne n = 0.04 e 0.04 = 0.038 (c) the the fraction of pulses containing more than one photon: P (n > 1) = 1 P (0) P (1) = 1 e n ne n = 7.8 10 4. One pulse in every 184 pulses has more than 1 photon. 5. Exercise 5.8 form course book Quantum Optics. Average photon number impinging on detector is: n = Φ T = 10 4, where Φ is the photon flux and T is the time interval. Average detected count rate N = η n = 10 3. (a) the light has Poissonian statistics: Mean photon number: N = 10 3. Standard deviation: From equation 5.56 we have: ( N) = η n = N. N = N = 44.7. (b) the light has super-poissonian statistics with n = n P oissonian : Mean photon number: N = 10 3. Standard deviation: ( N) = η 4 n+η(1 η) n = 0.3 n = 300. N = 56.6. (c) the light is a photon number state: Mean photon number: N = 10 3. Standard deviation:( N) = η(1 η) n = 0.16 n = 1600. N = 40.0. 6. Exercise 5.13 form course book Quantum Optics. An LED emitting light at 800 nm is driven b a 9 V battery through a resistor with R = 1000Ω. The LED has a quantum efficiency of 40% and 80% of the photons emitted are focussed onto a photodiode detector with a quantum efficiency of 90%. 3

(a) Calculate the average drive current, given that the voltage drop across the LED is approximately equivalent to the photon energy in ev in normal operating conditions: h π c Photon energy is = 1.55 ev. Voltage drop at LED is 1.55V.Voltage λ across resistor is 9 1.55 = 7.45 V. Current is U = 7.45 ma. R (b) Calculate the Fano factor of the drive current for T = 93 K: F drive = ( i) Johnson ( i) Shot noise = 4 k b T f R e<i> f = 7.0 10 3. (c) Calculate the average photocurrent in the detection circuit: Average photocurrent is: < i photo >= η DET e Φ = η DET e <i drive> η e LED η optics =.15 ma. (d) Calculate the Fano factor of the photocurrent: F photo = η T OT F drive + (1 η T OT ) = 0.714. (e) Compare the photocurrent noise power in a 50Ω load resistor with the shot noise level for a bandwidth of 10 khz: Shot-noise power: P shot noise = e R L f < i >= 0.34 fw. F photo = P measured P photo = 0.714. P measured = 0.5 fw. 7. Exercise 6.9 form course book Quantum Optics. (a) A single atom is irradiated with a powerful beam from a continous wave laser which can promoto the atom to an excited state with a radiative lifetime of τ R. On the assumption that the excitation time is negligibly small, calculate the probability that the atom emits two photons in a time T. We assume that the atom has just emitted a photon at time t = 0 and is re-excited immediately. We have to find now the probability (P ( T )) that the atom emits a second photon within time T. This probability is given by the ratio of the number of atoms decayed within T to the total number of atoms: P ( T ) = N decayed ( T ) N all. Number of decayed atoms after T is given by spontaneous emission. N decayed ( T ) = N all N all e T τr, where τ r is the natural lifetime of the atom. The probability to emit two photons is hence given by P ( T ) = 1 e T τr. (b) In a Hanbury Brown-Twiss (HBT) experiment, single-photon counting detectors with a response time of τ D are connected to the start 4

and stop inputs of a timer. The finite response time of the detectors implies that two events separated in time by τ d will be registered as simultaneously. Use this fact, together with the result of part (a), to estimate the value of g () (0) that would be expected in such a HBT experiment. To evaluate the g () function events are categorised according to the time difference between the start (detector A) and the stop (detector B) trigger. The time difference is T. If the detector response time was zero then we would have a continuous distribution of T. However with a finite detector response time τ D, this is the smallest time interval we can distinguish. The g () function is hence discreet and can be represented as a histogram, where the minimum size of the bin-width is equal to τ D, see fig 1. All events registered in time by less than τ D will be counted towards the same bin. For example all events with τ D < T τ D will be in bin 1. Bin 0 is twice as large ( τ D to τ D ) as we cannot make the difference which detector fired first, hence this bin contains positive and negative T values. The number of events in bin 0 (N 0 ) is equal to the total number of photons (N tot ) times 50% (only events where the photons went to different detectors are registered) times the probability that the atom emitted two photons during the time 1 ( T = τ D ), so: N 0 = N tot (1 eτ D/τ r ). If we just take look at positive T values then right side of bin 0 has N 0 / counts. We now need to normalise this by dividing the counts in each bin by the counts of a bin with large T. Remember tat for large times the g () function is 1. The counts in a such a bin is equal to: 1 1 N 0 = N tot. The second factor of 1 comes from the fact that we can now distinguish between events where detector A fired first from when detector B fired first. After normalisation the number of events in bin 0 is given by: N0 = (1 e τ D/τ r ). This results implies that the g () will not be zero even when a single atom is investigated due to the time uncertainty of the detectors. 5

N Bin 0 Bin 1 Bin τ D ΔT Figure 1: Histogram of the g () function. 6