Existence of solutions for a problem of resonance road space with weight arxiv:0905.1016v1 [math.ap] 7 May 2009 Antonio Ronaldo G. Garcia, Moisés D. dos Santos and Adrião D. D. Neto 2 Abstract Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido UFERSA Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte UFRN In this work we use variational methods to show the existence of weak solutions for a nonlinear problem of the type elliptic. This problem was initially study by the authors Ahmad, Lazer and Paul (see [1]) considering the space Ω R n a bounded domains. In this work we extend your result now considering the domain R n. Indeed, the main theorems in this paper constitute an extension to R n of your previous results in bounded domains. Key words: Resonance, weight space, variational methods, elliptic equation Introduction In this work we obtain a result of existence of weak solution for the problem { u + u = λk h(x)u + g(x, u), on R n, n 3 u H 1 (R n (1) ) where h : R n R +, g : R n R R, are continuous functions satisfying the following conditions: 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification, 35J20 Email address: ronaldogarcia@ufersa.edu.br, mdantas@ufersa.edu.br and adriao@dca.ufrn.br (Antonio Ronaldo G. Garcia, Moisés D. dos Santos and Adrião D. D. Neto) URL: www.ufersa.edu.br and www.dca.ufrn.br (Antonio Ronaldo G. Garcia, Moisés D. dos Santos and Adrião D. D. Neto) 1 Departamento de Ciências Exatas e Naturais DCEN, CEP.: 59625-900, Mossoró-RN 2 Departamento de Engenharia de Computação e Automação DCA, CEP.: 59078-900, Natal-RN Preprint submitted to Ordinary Diffential Equation May 7, 2009
(i) h L 1 (R n ) L (R n ); (ii) There is a function Z L 1 (R n ) L (R n ) such that Z(x) > 0, x R n, and g(x, t) Z(x), (x, t) R n R. (2) Furthermore, λ k is the k-th eigenvalue associated with the problem { u + u = λh(x)u, on R n, n 3 u H 1 ( ) characterizing the problem (1) as a problem of resonance (see Definition 1.2 pg. 2 of [4]). Furthermore, we assume that g satisfies one of the conditions (g 2 + ) or (g2 ), this is, G(x, v(x)) d x ±, (4) v where v N λk the eigenspace associated with the eigenvalue λ k and G(x, ) = s 0 g(x, τ) dτ is the primitive of the function g(x, ). We find a weak solution for the problem (1) determining critical points of the energy functional associated Φ : H 1 (R n ) R defined by Φ(u) = 1 2 ( u 2 + u 2) d x λ k R 2 n u 2 h dx G(x, u) dx. R n R n In this work we generalized the result from Lazer-Ahmad-Paul in [1]. For this was necessary some theorics results once again that the domain considered here is no bounded. In a space no bounded no exists immersion compact of the Soboleve space H 1 (R n ) in L p (R n ). We contorted this working in spaces with weight. Problems at resonance have been of interest to researchers ever since the pioneering work of Landesman and Lazer [7] in 1970 for second order elliptic operators in bounded domains. The literature on resonance problems in bounded domains is quite vast; of particular interest to this paper are the works of Ahmad, Lazer and Paul [1] in 1976 and of Rabinowitz in 1978, in which critical point methods are applied. Recently, using other tecnic, Garza and Rumbos [4] do a result that is a extension to R n of the Ahmad, Lazer 2 (3)
and Paul result. In this paper, furthermore of resonance they obtain result on strong resonance. Resonance problems on unbounded domains, and in particular in R n, have been studied recently by Costa and Tehrani [2] and by Jeanjean [6], and by Stuart and Zhou [9] for radially symmetric solutions for asymptotically linear problems in R n. In all these references variational methods were used. Hetzer and Landesman [5] for resonant problems for a class of operators which includes the Schrödinger operator. The problem of resonance that we work can be see in [10] for bounded domain. We write in general the direction of our proposal, In the Section we define spaces with weight and show that this space is Banach. In the Section 2 we show two important results, a of immersions continuous and the other of immersion compact space of the space H 1 (R n ) in L p (R n, h d x). Finally, in the Section 3 we show the main result of this work that guarantees the existence of weak solution to the problem (1). 1. Spaces with weight In this section we define spaces with weight and show some properties involving these spaces. For this, start with the following: Definition 1. Let h : (0, + ) be a measurable function and 1 < p <. We define the space L p (, hdx) the space of all the measurable functions f : R n R such that R n f(x) p h(x) d x <, i.e, L p (, hdx ) := { f : R measurable In the that follow we denoted by } f(x) p h(x) d x <. ( ( u = u 2 + u 2) ) 1/2 ( d x and f = p,h f p h d x the norms in H 1 ( ) and L p (, h d x), respectively. ) 1/p Theorem 1. The space ( L p (, h dx); p,h ) with 1 p < is a Banach s space. 3
Proof. Let {u n } L p (, hdx) be a Cauchy s sequence. Then, give ǫ > 0 there exists n 0 N such that Define v n = h 1 p un, it follow from (5) that u n u m p,h < ǫ, n, m n 0. (5) v n v m L p ( ) < ǫ, n, m n 0. Since L p ( ) is a Banach space, there exists w L p ( ) with Defining, u(x) = w(x), note that h(x) 1 p u n u p,h = = v n n w (6) ( u n u p hdx R ( N ) 1 p ) 1 h 1 p un h 1 p p p u dx u n u p,h = ( v n w p dx = v n w L p (R ). N ) 1 p From (6), we have u n u p,h n 0, that is, u n Therefore, L p (, hdx) is a Banach s space. u in L p (, hdx). n From Theorem 1 we can conclude that ( L 2 (, hdx), 2,h ) is a Hilbert s space with the inner product (f, g) 2,h = hfg d x. 2. Auxiliary results In this section we show two auxiliary results important for we show that the problem (1) have weak solution. The first is a result of continuous immersion and the second a result of compact immersion, both of the space H 1 (R n ) in L p (R n, h dx). 4
2.1. A result of continuous immersion Theorem 2. If h L ( ), then applies continuous immersion H 1 ( ) L p (, hdx) for all p [1, 2 ] (2 = 2N/(N 2)) if N 3. Proof. For u H 1 ( ), we have ( u p hdx ) 1 p ) 1 h u (R p p d x N = h u L p ( ). Since h L ( ). From Sobolev s continuous immersion, we have H 1 ( ) L p ( ), p [2, 2 ], if N 3. Thus, there exists C > 0 such that u L p ( ) C u, u H1 ( ). Therefore, ( ) 1/p u p hdx C h u, u H 1 ( ). Considering C 1 = C h, we have ( ) 1/p u p hdx C 1 u, that is, u p,h C 1 u, u H 1 ( ) showing the continuous immersion. 5
2.2. A result of Compact immersion Lemma 1. Give ǫ > 0, there exists R > 0 such that u nj u L p (B c R (0),hdx) < ǫ 2, n j. Proof. Indeed, to R > 0 and using the Hölder inequality with exponents = 1, we get 1 + 1 γ 2 p B c R (0) unj u p h dx h L γ (B c R (0)). unj u p L 2 p (Bc R (0)) B c R (0) unj u p h dx h L γ (B c R (0)). unj u p L 2 ( ) and from the Sobolev s continuous immersions, we have B c R (0) unj u p h dx C h L γ (B c R (0)). unj u p. Consequently, h u nj u p d x C 1 h L γ BR c (0) (BR c (0)). (7) Follows the theory of measure that if h L γ ( ), γ [1, ), give ǫ > 0 there exists R > 0 such that ( ǫ ) p h L γ (BR c (0)) < 1. 2 C 1 Now, from result above and from (7), we obtain h unj u ( p ǫ ) p dx n j. BR c (0) 2 Therefore, unj u L p (B c R (0),h dx) < ǫ 2 n j (8) which show the lemma. 6
Theorem 3. If h L 1 ( ) L ( ), has the compact immersion if N 3. H 1 ( ) L p (, h dx), p [1, 2 ) Proof. Let (u n ) H 1 ( ) be a bounded sequence, using the fact that H 1 ( ) is a reflexive space there exists (u nj ) (u n ) such that Furthermore, u nj u L p (B R (0),h d x) = u nj u in H 1 ( ). ( B R (0) h unj u ) 1 p p dx h. u nj u L p (B R (0)). From Sobolev s compact immersions, we have H 1 ( ) L p (B R (0)), of where follows u nj u in n j Lp (B R (0)). Thus, give ǫ > 0 there exists n j0 such that u nj u L p (B R (0)) < ǫ 2 h, n j n j0, thus, we have u nj u L p (B R (0),h d x) < ǫ 2, n j n j0. (9) From Lemma 1 and (9), we have unj u p,h < ǫ, n j n j0 u nj showing the compactness. u in n j Lp (, h d x) 7
3. Main result 3.1. Preliminaries We consider the functional Φ : H 1 ( ) R such that Φ(u) = 1 ( u 2 + u 2 ) dx λ k u 2 h d x G(x, u) dx. (10) 2 R 2 N This functional is well defined in H 1 ( ), is of class C 1 (H 1 ( ), R) (see [3]) and its critical points are weak solutions of (1). We set the linear operator Lu = u λ k S(u), we have (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = ( (Lu) u + Lu.u) dx, thus, (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = ( (u λ k S(u)) u dx + (u λ k S(u))u dx, this is, (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = ( u 2 + u 2 ) d x λ k ( S(u) u+s(u)u) dx. (11) Moreover, considering S(u) = w, we have { w + w = hu, R N w H 1 ( ) ( φ w + φw) dx = uhφ dx, φ H 1 ( ). Fixing u = φ, ( S(u) u + S(u)u) dx = u 2 h dx. (12) Therefore, from (11) and (12), we have 1 2 (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = 1 ( u 2 + u 2 ) d x λ k 2 R 2 N 8 u 2 h dx
from which follows Φ(u) = 1 2 (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) G(x, u) dx. where Now, we fix the following orthogonal decomposition of X = H 1 ( ), X = X X 0 X +, X 0 = N λk, X = N λ1 N λ2... N λk 1 and X + = N λk+1 N λk+2... Proposition 1. If u X 0, then (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = 0. Proof. As we have seen that (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = ( u 2 + u 2 ) dx λ k u 2 h d x, since u X 0, it is solution of the problem { u + u = λk hu, of where, we have Fixing φ = u, showing that if u X 0. ( φ u + φu) = λ k u H 1 ( ) ( u 2 + u 2 ) dx = λ k uφh dx, φ H 1 ( ). (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = 0, u 2 h dx, Proposition 2. If u X, then there exists α > 0 such that this is, L is negative defined in X. (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) α u 2, 9
Proof. Let u X = N λ1 N λ2... N λk 1, be, then u = φ 1 + φ 2 +... + φ k 1 and u = φ 1 + φ 2 +... + φ k 1. Note that from (11) (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = ( u 2 + u 2 ) d x λ k ( S(u) u + us(u)) dx thus, (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = (u, u) H 1 ( ) λ k (S(u), u) H 1 ( ). (13) Provided that φ j satisfies { φj + φ j = λ j hφ j, From definition of the solution operator φ j H 1 ( ) S(λ j φ j ) = φ j therefore, S(φ j ) = 1 λ j φ j and S(φ j ) = 1 λ j φ j. From linearity of S, we have Thus, S(u) = S(φ 1 ) + S(φ 2 ) + + S(φ k 1 ) S(u) = 1 λ 1 φ 1 + 1 λ 2 φ 2 + + 1 λ k 1 φ k 1. (S(u), u) H 1 ( ) = (S(φ 1 ) + S(φ 2 ) + + S(φ k 1 ), φ 1 + φ 2 + + φ k 1 ) H 1 ( ) and provided that (φ j, φ k ) H 1 ( ) = 0, if j k, we obtain (S(u), u) H 1 ( ) = 1 λ 1 (φ 1, φ 1 ) H 1 ( ) + + 1 λ k 1 (φ k 1, φ k 1 ) H 1 ( ). 10
It follows from definition of inner product in H 1 ( ) that (S(u), u) H 1 ( ) = 1 ( φ 1 2 + φ 1 2 ) d x+ + 1 ( φ k 1 2 + φ k 1 2 ) dx λ 1 R λ N k 1 which implies this is, Furthermore, hence, k 1 λ k λ k (S(u), u) H 1 ( ) = ( φ j 2 + φ j 2 ) dx, R λ N j j=1 k 1 λ k (S(u), u) H 1 ( ) = λ k φ j 2. λ j (u, u) H 1 ( ) = (φ 1 + φ 2 + + φ k 1, φ 1 + φ 2 + + φ k 1 ) H 1 ( ) j=1 k 1 k 1 (u, u) H 1 ( ) = ( φ j 2 + φ j 2 ) dx = φ j 2. j=1 Now, we can to writer (13) of the follows way and using the fact that k 1 (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = j=1 ( 1 λ ) k φ j 2 λ j λ j λ k 1, j {1, 2,..., k 1} j=1 thus, (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) 1 λ k λ k 1 1 λ k λ j = k 1 ( 1 λ ) k φ j 2 λ j=1 k 1 ( 1 λ ) k k 1 φ j 2. λ k 1 j=1 11
Therefore, from where we have this is, and α > 0. (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) ( 1 λ ) k u 2 λ k 1 ( ) λk 1 u 2, λ k 1 (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) α u 2 < 0, u X \ {0} Proposition 3. If u X +, then there exists α > 0 such that (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) α u 2, this is, L is positive defined in X +. Proof. Suppose that u X + = N λk+1 N λk+2.... Then u = φ k+1 +φ k+2 +... We consider, u = φ j = lim N w N, where w N = N φ j, w N X +. We show that there exists α > 0 independent of N such that Indeed, note that (Lw N, w N ) H 1 ( ) α w N 2, N {k + 1, k + 2,... }. (Lw N, w N ) H 1 ( ) = ( N Lφ j, N ( N (Lw N, w N ) H 1 ( ) = (φ j λ k S(φ j )), consequently, (Lw N, w N ) H 1 ( ) = ( N φ j, N φ j ) H 1 ( ) ( N φ j ) N H 1 ( ) φ j ) λ k S(φ j ), Now, using the same reasoning from Proposition 2, we have (Lw N, w N ) H 1 ( ) = N 12 φ j 2 N λ k λ j φ j 2 H 1 ( ) N φ j ) H 1 ( ).
and noting that λ k λ k+1 we find 1 λ k 1 λ k. λ j λ k+1 Therefore, Thus, showing that (Lw N, w N ) H 1 ( ) (Lw N, w N ) H 1 ( ) ( 1 λ ) N k φ j 2. λ k+1 ( 1 λ ) k w N 2 λ k+1 where α = (Lw N, w N ) H 1 ( ) α w N 2, N {k + 1, k + 2,... }, (14) ( 1 λ k λ k+1 ). Using the fact that w N N u, we obtain w N 2 N u 2 and from continuity of L, we obtain L(w N ) N L(u). Consequently, (Lw N, w N ) H 1 ( ) N (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) thus, passing to the limit at (14) follows that (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) α u 2 Notation 1. In the that follows, we denoted by P, P 0 and P + the orthogonais projections on X, X 0 and X +, respectively. Lemma 2. If u = P 0 u+p + u X 0 X +, then (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = (LP + u, P + u) H 1 ( ). Proof. Suppose that (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = (L(P 0 u+p + u), P 0 u+p + u) H 1 ( ). Then (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = (LP 0 u + LP + u, P 0 u + P + u) H 1 ( ). Using the Proposition 1 and the fact that L is symmetric operator, we obtain (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = 2(LP 0 u, P + u) H 1 ( ) + (LP + u, P + u) H 1 ( ). 13
Note that (LP 0 u, P + u) H 1 ( ) = (P 0 u λ k S(P 0 u), P + u) H 1 ( ) hence, (LP 0 u, P + u) H 1 ( ) = λ k (S(P 0 u), P + u) H 1 ( ). Therefore, by the definition of operator solution, we obtain (LP 0 u, P + u) H 1 ( ) = (P 0 u, P + u) L 2 (,hdx) = 0, where the last equality we use the orthogonality of the projections. Thus, (Lu, u) H 1 ( ) = (LP + u, P + u) H 1 ( ). Proposition 4. Suppose valid the conditions (2) and (g 2 ). Then (a) Φ(u), u X. u + (b) Φ(u) +, u X 0 X +. u + Proof. (a) Suppose that u X. Using the fact that L is defined negative in X, we obtain Φ(u) 1 2 α u 2 G(x, u) dx. Note that for the mean value Theorem, we have G(x, u) G(x, 0) = G (x, s) u, s(x) [0, u(x)] or s(x) [u(x), 0], thus from (2) G(x, u) G(x, 0) Z(x) u therefore, G(x, u) dx u 1,Z, of where we have that Φ(u) 1 2 α u 2 + u 1,Z. From Theorem 3 follows that u 2,Z C 1 u, then Φ(u) 1 2 α u 2 + C 2 u consequently, Φ(u) u +, u X. (b) Suppose that u = P 0 u+p + u X 0 X +. Using the Lemma 2 has been Φ(u) = 1 (LP 2 +u, P + u) H 1 ( ) G(x, u) dx. Furthermore, since L defined positive in X + follows that Φ(u) 1 2 α P +u 2 [G(x, u) G(x, P 0 u)] dx G(x, P 0 u) dx. 14
Using again the mean value Theorem and (2), we have [G(x, u) G(x, P 0 u)] dx G(x, u) G(x, P 0 u) dx u P 0 u Z(x) dx [G(x, u) G(x, P 0 u) dx P + u 1,Z. Therefore, follows from the continuous immersion (see Theorem 2) that Φ(u) 1 2 α P +u 2 C P + u G(x, P 0 u) dx. (15) Now, using the condition (g 2 ), the fact that u 2 = P + u 2 + P 0 u 2 and analyzing the cases: (i) P 0 u + and P + u M. Using (g2 ) and doing the analysis in (15), we have Φ(u) +. u + (ii) P + u + e P 0 u K. Note that R G(x, P 0 u) dx G(x, P 0 u) dx N R N P 0 u Z(x) dx, that is, R G(x, P 0 u)dx K 1, K 1 R +. N Thus, doing the analysis in (15), we have Φ(u) u + +. (iii) If P + u + and P 0 u +. Again the condition (g2 ) and doing the analysis in (15, follows that Φ(u) which shows (b). u + +, Remark 1. If we had assumed the condition (g + 2 ) to (g 2 ) instead of the reasoning used was the same and the conclusions were the following: (a) Φ(u) (b) Φ(u), u X 0 X. u + +, u X +. u + 15
3.2. Weak solution to the problem (1) We are ready to state and prove the main result of our work. This result guarantees the existence of a critical point to the functional Φ, and therefore the existence of a weak solution to the problem (1). For we show the existence of weak solution for the problem (1) we use the theorem from the saddle of Rabionowitz. Theorem 4 (Saddle Point Theorem [8]). Let X = V W be a Banach space, of way that dim V <, and let φ C 1 (X, R) be a maps satisfying the condition of Palais-Smale. If D is a bounded neighborhood of the 0 in V such that a = max φ < inf φ b, (16) D W then c = inf max h Γ u D is a critical value of φ with c b, where φ(h(u)) Γ = { h C ( D, X ) h(u) = u, u D }. Theorem 5. If the conditions (g + 2 ) or (g 2 ) are true, then (1) has a weak solution, i.e., there exists u H 1 ( ) such that u is a weak solution of (1). Proof. As we already know that Φ C 1 (X, R), We show that Φ satisfies the Palais-Smale condition (PS), i.e, give the sequence (u n ) H 1 ( ) with Φ(u n ) c and Φ (u n ) 0 we have that (u n ) has been a subsequence convergent. Indeed, since Φ(u n ) = 1 2 (Lu n, u n ) H 1 ( ) G(x, u n ) dx, then (Φ (u n ))v = (Lu n, v) H 1 ( ) g(x, u n )v d x (Φ (u n ))v = (Lu n, v) g(x, u n )v d x. (17) 16
Furthermore, (Φ (u n ))v Φ (u n ) v where we have (Φ (u n ))v v, v H 1 ( ), for n large enough, since Φ (u n ) 0 Φ (u n ) 0 thus, Φ (u n ) 1. Now, our next step is to show that is bounded. Note that u n = P 0 u n + P u n + P + u n (18) (i) If v = P + u n, replacing in (17) follows that (Φ (u n ))P + u n = (Lu n, P + u n ) g(x, u n )P + u n d x. Note that using the same reasoning from Lemma 2, (Lu n, P + u n ) = (L(P u n ) + L(P 0 u n ) + L(P + u n ), P + u n ) = (L(P + u n ), P + u n ). Hence, using the fact that L is defined positive in X +, we have that Furthermore, P + u n (Lu n, P + u n ) = (L(P + u n ), P + u n ) From Theorem 2, we have that thus P + u n is bounded. α P + u n 2. Φ (u n )P + u n (Lu n, P + u n ) g(x, u n )P + u n dx P + u n α P + u n 2 P + u n 1,Z. P + u n α P + u n 2 C P + u n, 17
(ii) Again, considering v = P u n in 17, we obtain (Φ (u n ))(P u n ) (Lu n, P u n ) + g(x, u n ) P + u n dx, from which follow that (Φ (u n ))(P u n ) α P u n 2 + P u n 1,Z thus, consequently, Thus, P u n is bounded. Now, from (i) and (ii) has been P u n Φ (u n )P u n α P u n 2 + C 1 P u n P u n α P u n 2 C 1 P u n. u n P 0 u n = P + u n + P u n K, K R +. (19) For another side, we can write Φ(u n ) = 1 2 (L(u n P 0 u n ), u n P 0 u n ) [G(x, u n ) G(x, P 0 u n ) dx G(x, P 0 u n ) dx we have that, G(x, P 0 u n ) d x = 1 R 2 (L(u n P 0 u n ), u n P 0 u n ) Φ(u n ) N [G(x, u n ) G(x, P 0 u n )] d x. Now, since L = I λ k S, we have that L is bounded, thus (L(u n P 0 u n ), u n P 0 u n ) L(u n P 0 u n ) u n P 0 u n L u n P 0 u n 2, 18
and from (19), we obtain (L(u n P 0 u n ), u n P 0 u n ) C, C R +. Note that G(x, P 0 u n ) d x 1 R 2 (L(u n P 0 u n ), u n P 0 u n ) + Φ(u n ) + N + [G(x, u n ) G(x, P 0 u n )] dx therefore, G(x, P 0 u n )dx C 1, C 1 R +. Hence, using the condition (g 2 ) we can conclude that P 0u n is bounded. Note that the orthogonality of the projection, we have that u n 2 = P 0 u n 2 + P u n 2 + P + u n 2, showing that (u n ) is bounded. We know that (Φ (u))v = ( u v + uv) dx (ψ (u))v, u, v H 1 ( ) where thus Therefore, ψ(u) = ( ) λk 2 u2 h + G(x, u) d x, ( (Φ(u)), v) H 1 ( ) = (u, v) H 1 ( ) ( (ψ(u)), v) H 1 ( ). ( (Φ(u)), v) H 1 ( ) = (u (ψ(u)), v) H 1 ( ) and consequently, (Φ(u)) = u (ψ(u)). Considering T(u) = (ψ(u)), we have that (Φ(u)) = u T(u). Therefore, (Φ(u n )) = u n T(u n ) u n = (Φ(u n )) + T(u n ). 19
Now, since T : H 1 ( ) H 1 ( ) compact (see Appendix C of [3]), there exists (u nj ) (u n ) such that T(u nj ) n j + u and using the fact that Φ (u n ) 0 Φ (u n ) 0 φ(u n ) 0 Φ(u n ) 0, passing to the limit in u nj = (Φ(u nj )) + T(u nj ) we find u nj u nj showing that Φ satisfies the conditions (PS). Finally, we have that Φ C 1 (H 1 ( ), R), and Φ satisfies the condition of Palais-Smale and using the Proposition 4 we can apply the Theorem from the saddle of Rabionowitz with V = X and W = X 0 X + and ensure the existence of a critical point for Φ, therefore, a weak solution for the problem (1). References [1] S. Ahmad, A. C. Lazer, and J. L. Paul, Elementary critical point theory and pertubations of elliptic boudary-value problems at resonance, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 25, (1976), pp. 933 944. [2] D. G. Costa and H. Tehrani, On a class of asymptotically linear elliptic problems in R n, D. Diff. Eqs., (2001), pp. 470 494. [3] M. D. dos Santos, Existência de soluções para uma classe de problemas elípticos via métodos variacionais, master s thesis, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande - UFCG, 2005. [4] G. L. Garza and A. J. Rumbos, Resonance and strong resonance for semilinear elliptic equations in R n, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, (2003). 20
[5] G. Hetzer and E. M. Landesman, On the solvability of a semilinear operator equation at resonance as applied to elliptic boundary value problems in unbounded domains, Journal of Differential Equations, 50 (1983). [6] L. Jeanjean, On the existence of bounded palais-smale sequences and application to a landesman-lazer type problem set on R n, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburg, (1999), pp. 787 809. [7] E. M. Landesman and A. C. Lazer, Nonlinear pertubations of linear elliptic boundary value problems at resonance, J. Math. Mech., (1970), pp. 609 623. [8] P. H. Rabinowitz, Minimax methods in critical point theory with applications to partial differential equations, Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, Number 65 AMS, 1984. [9] H. S. Stuart, C. A. and Zhou, Applying the mountainpass theorem to an asymptotically linear elliptic equation on R n, Comm. Part. Diff. Eqs., (1999), pp. 1731 1758. [10] M. Willem, Minimax theorems, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, Birkhäuser, 24 (1996). 21