GeV neutrino mass models: Experimental reach vs. theoretical predictions RWR, Walter Winter Arxiv 1607.07880 PRD 94, 073004 (016) Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16
Theory of elementary particle physics > The Standard Model (SM) > Successful at describing all observed particle interactions at the LHC and preceding colliders > Shortcomings: Neutrino masses, dark matter, baryon asymmetry and etc. > Introducing sterile neutrinos Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page
Beyond the SM > Possible extension: The Neutrino Minimal Standard Model (numsm) [Asaka, Shaposhnikov (005); Canetti, Drewes, Frossard,Shaposhnikov (01); Drewes, Garbrecht (015); Hernandez, Kekic, Lopez-Pavon, Racker, Salvado (016)..] > N 1 is dark matter candidate with kev mass and total mixing U I 10 8 > N and N 3 with 100 MeV-100 GeV mass: Origin of neutrino masses and baryon asymmetry Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 3
numsm requirements and beyond 3 > numsm: Mass degeneracy M / M 10 for successful baryon asymmetry [Canetti, Drewes, Frossard, Shaposhnikov (01)] > We will consider 3 sterile neutrinos at the GeV scale: No mass degeneracy needed. [Drewes, Garbrecht (01)] > Essentially, we only need three Yukawa/mass matrices M l =vy l, M D I =vy I and M R which appear in the seesaw Lagrangian 1 C LSeesaw =L SM N I i N I Y I L N I M R N I N I h.c. to calculate the observables Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 4
Neutrino masses and mixing 1 > Seesaw mechanism m = M D M R 1 assumption M D M R 1 T M D and M N =M R with [Minkowski (1977); Gell-Mann, Ramond, Slansky (1979); Yanagida (1980); Mohapatra (1980); Schechter, Valle (1980)] H H * T > The PMNS mixing matrix U PMNS =U l U where U l := U l > The active-sterile mixing matrix > Decay rates depend on H 1 U I = U l M D M R U N I N I l X U I X =hadron [Gorbunov, Shaposhnikov (007)] > We will focus on the individual mixing element U I and total mixing U = U I I for sterile neutrino Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 5
Generic assumptions > We used the Casas-Ibarra parameterization M D=U PMNS m R M R [Casas, Ibarra (001)] m =diag m1, m, m3 and M R =diag M 1, M, M 3 with m1 [0,0.3]eV and M i [0.1, 80]GeV with M 1 M M 3 > Here T > The complex matrix R have to satisfy R R=1. This means it can be parameterized by rotation matrices with a complex angle [ c1 c13 s 1 c 13 s 13 R= s1 c 3 c 1 s 3 s 13 c 1 c 3 s 1 s 3 s 13 s3 c 13 s1 s 3 c1 c 3 s 13 c1 s3 s 1 c 3 s13 c 3 c 13 ] c ij =cos ij and sij =sin ij with Re ij [0, ] and Im ij [ 8,8] > where Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 6
Generic assumptions continued > Beside Casas-Ibarra parameterization, we investigated random matrices ye Y l= 0 0 0 0 y 0 0 y c1 c c3 M D =m D c 4 c 5 c6 c7 c 8 c9 > Again, M i [0.1, 80]GeV > M1 0 0 M R= 0 M 0 0 0 M3 with M 1 M M 3 O 1 comeplex numbers: ci =k i [0.,5] and arg c i = i [0, ] > Rescale m D so m 0.7eV and obey mass square differences Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 7
Flavor models > Flavor symmetric mass models in the Froggatt-Nielsen (FN) framework [Froggatt, Nielsen (1979)] [Plentinger, Seidl, Winter (007)] Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 8
Flavor models continued > We assume 0. since 8 4 5 4 mu : mc : mt : :1, md :m s : mb : :1 and me : m : m : : 1. > Additionally, this value also appears in the CKM mixing matrix and it can possibly explain the neutrino mass ratio due to m1 / m 3 = m1 : m :m3 : :1, m1 :m :m3 1 :1 : and m1 : m : m3 1:1 :1. (Normal hierarchy) (Inverted hierarchy) (Quasi-degenerate) > Again, M i [0.1, 80]GeV with M 1 M M 3, and O 1 complex numbers ci =k i [0.,5] and m 0.7 ev arg c i = i [0, ] Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 9
Experimental constraints & future experiments > All realizations have to obey experimental constraints: Neutrino oscillation data, LFV, neutrinoless double beta decay, direct searches, loop corrections and Big Bang nucleosynthesis > Future experiments: DUNE, SHiP and FCC [Adams et. al. (013), Blondel, Graverini, Serra, Shaposhnikov (014), Alekhin et. al. (015); Anelli et al. (015)] > Sensitivity calculated under the assumption U ei : U I : U I =1:16 :3.8 > Focus on total mixing U I and individual mixing elements U ei and U I Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 10
Generic assumption Total active-sterile mixing for N1 > Casas-Ibarra parameterization can generate the whole parameter space [Drewes, Garbrecht (015)] > But still interesting to investigate the scatter plot of the mixing elements [RWR, Winter (016)] Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 11
Flavor models Total active-sterile mixing for N1 Total mixing is partially within reach [RWR, Winter (016)] Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 1
Generic assumptions - Individual mixing elements for N1 > No preference for particular mixing [RWR, Winter (016)] Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 13
Flavor models - Individual mixing elements for N1 > Structure in mass matrices leads to refined mixing [RWR, Winter (016)] > Therefore, channels such as N e /e K and N / K can resolve this mixing pattern Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 14
Summary > Sterile neutrinos are theoretically motivated and can solve many of the problems in the SM > Generic assumptions generates the whole parameter space > Predictions from flavor models are more refined in comparison to generic assumptions > Potential to exclude parameter space of models by measuring the total mixing > Important to measure the individual mixing elements Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 15
Back-up Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 16
Number of sterile neutrinos and consequences > The Lagrangian becomes 1 C LSeesaw =L SM N I i N I Y I L N I M R N I N I h.c. for Majorana neutrinos (Dirac vs Majorana particles) > Number of sterile neutrinos symmetries I and mass scale M R cannot be fixed by > I =1 : Only one of the active neutrinos gets a mass > I = : Minimal requirement to explain neutrino masses and baryon asymmetry > I =3 : All active neutrinos get masses and all oscillation experiments > I 3 : Different combinations of the above together with extra relativistic (including LSND) can be explained together with the baryon asymmetry. If LSND is dropped, dark matter can also be explained degrees of freedom in cosmology, neutrino anomalies etc. Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 17
New mass scale and Yukawas [Abazajian et al (01)] Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 18
Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism > Pictorial diagram of generating fermion mass terms with flavons acquiring universal VEVs v f and heavy fermions with universal mass M F Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 19
Experimental constraints > Neutrino oscillations o 31.9 1 35.91 5 o o o o 7.85 13 9.10 38.0 3 53.30 7.0 10 m 1 [ev ] 8.09 10 5 3 o.3 10 m 3 [ev ].6 10 3 [Gonzalez-Garcia, Maltoni, Schwetz (016)] > Lepton flavor violation Br e 5.7 10 13 Br 1.5 10 8 8 Br e 1.8 10 [MEG Collaboration (013)] Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 0
Experimental constraints > Loop corrections due to virtual heavy neutrinos [Pilaftsis (199)] > Neutrinoless double beta decay m 0. ev [GERDA Collaboration (013)] > Direct searches [CHARM (1995), DELPHI (1997), NuTeV (1999), NOMAD (001), PS191 (01) etc.. ] > Big Bang nucleosynthesis N 0.1s [Dolgov, Hansen, Raffelt, Semikoz (000), Ruchayskiy, Ivashko (01) ] Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 1
Complementary among experiments > Mixing for the lightest sterile neutrino Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page
Total mixing for N3 > FCC constrains the parameter space for heavier sterile neutrinos Rasmus W. Rasmussen Matter and the Universe 1-1-16 Page 3