The Skeldar V-150 flight control system. Modeling, identification and control of an unmanned helicopter. Saab AB. Saab Aerosystems.

Similar documents
Chapter 6 Control Systems Design by Root-Locus Method. Lag-Lead Compensation. Lag lead Compensation Techniques Based on the Root-Locus Approach.

Lecture 8. PID control. Industrial process control ( today) PID control. Insights about PID actions

Lecture 8 - SISO Loop Design

Compensation Techniques

PID CONTROL. Presentation kindly provided by Dr Andy Clegg. Advanced Control Technology Consortium (ACTC)

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Root Locus Analysis

The Root Locus Method

Lag-Lead Compensator Design

Lecture 5 Introduction to control

Stability. ME 344/144L Prof. R.G. Longoria Dynamic Systems and Controls/Lab. Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin

Singular Value Analysis of Linear- Quadratic Systems!

MM1: Basic Concept (I): System and its Variables

Gain and Phase Margins Based Delay Dependent Stability Analysis of Two- Area LFC System with Communication Delays

Chapter 4. Simulations. 4.1 Introduction

Lecture 4. Chapter 11 Nise. Controller Design via Frequency Response. G. Hovland 2004

Ali Karimpour Associate Professor Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Control Systems Engineering ( Chapter 7. Steady-State Errors ) Prof. Kwang-Chun Ho Tel: Fax:

ECE-320 Linear Control Systems. Spring 2014, Exam 1. No calculators or computers allowed, you may leave your answers as fractions.

Module 4: Time Response of discrete time systems Lecture Note 1

Chapter 7. Root Locus Analysis

16.400/453J Human Factors Engineering. Manual Control II

Hover and Forward Flight of an Autonomous UAV

A Simplified Methodology for the Synthesis of Adaptive Flight Control Systems

Root Locus Contents. Root locus, sketching algorithm. Root locus, examples. Root locus, proofs. Root locus, control examples

Homework 12 Solution - AME30315, Spring 2013

MODERN CONTROL SYSTEMS

Sensorless speed control including zero speed of non salient PM synchronous drives

376 CHAPTER 6. THE FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN METHOD. D(s) = we get the compensated system with :

ME2142/ME2142E Feedback Control Systems

Stability Criterion Routh Hurwitz

Multivariable Control Systems

NONLINEAR H HELICOPTER HOVERING CONTROL AND IMPLEMENTATION USING CSIA

Root Locus Diagram. Root loci: The portion of root locus when k assume positive values: that is 0

Wolfgang Hofle. CERN CAS Darmstadt, October W. Hofle feedback systems

Chapter 10. Closed-Loop Control Systems

Design By Emulation (Indirect Method)

G(s) = 1 s by hand for! = 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 rad/sec.

State Space: Observer Design Lecture 11

ME 375 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Friday December 17, 2004

ECE 3510 Root Locus Design Examples. PI To eliminate steady-state error (for constant inputs) & perfect rejection of constant disturbances

CHAPTER 4 DESIGN OF STATE FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS AND STATE OBSERVERS USING REDUCED ORDER MODEL

CISE302: Linear Control Systems

SKEE 3143 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN. CHAPTER 3 Compensator Design Using the Bode Plot

ME 375 FINAL EXAM Wednesday, May 6, 2009

March 18, 2014 Academic Year 2013/14

Digital Control System

EE/ME/AE324: Dynamical Systems. Chapter 8: Transfer Function Analysis

Mechatronics Assignment # 1

Throttle Actuator Swapping Modularity Design for Idle Speed Control

Chapter 13. Root Locus Introduction

Behavioral thermal modeling for quad-core microprocessors

Use of Micro Spoilers for Control of Finned Projectiles

Lecture #9 Continuous time filter

1 Routh Array: 15 points

Analysis of Step Response, Impulse and Ramp Response in the Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor System

Robust Flight Control Design for a Turn Coordination System with Parameter Uncertainties

Efficient Simulation for Strongly Coupled Noise- Vibration-Harshness (NVH) R. S. Puri, D. Morrey, Oxford Brooks E. B.

Cogging torque reduction of Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (IPMSM)

arxiv: v1 [cs.sy] 24 May 2018

FUZZY-PID ALGORITHM CONTROL FOR HELI2DOF ABSTRACT

EE Control Systems LECTURE 14

Performance Improvement of Direct Torque Controlled Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive by Considering Magnetic Saturation

Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Modeling, Dynamics and Control III Spring 2002

Sliding Mode Control of a Dual-Fuel System Internal Combustion Engine

Flight Dynamics & Control Equations of Motion of 6 dof Rigid Aircraft-Kinematics

Non-linear Dynamic Inversion

On the Vibration Behavior Study of a Nonlinear Flexible Composite Beam Under Excitation Forces via Nonlinear Active Vibration Controller

Closed loop control of a flap exposed to harmonic aerodynamic actuation. Clara M. Velte Robert Mikkelsen Jens N. Sørensen Teodor Kaloyanov Mac Gaunaa

Multi-layer Flight Control Synthesis and Analysis of a Small-scale UAV Helicopter

6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 6: Steady-State Errors Prof. Joel L. Dawson S -

Chapter 9: Controller design. Controller design. Controller design

Electro-Hydraulic Piston Control using Neural MRAC Based on a Modified State Observer

6.447 rad/sec and ln (% OS /100) tan Thus pc. the testing point is s 3.33 j5.519

Analysis of Stability &

PIM Digital Redesign and Experiments of a Roll-Angle Controller for a VTOL-UAV

DETERMINATION OF THE POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY IN CAPACITIVE DIGITAL ACCELEROMETERS USING THEORY OF LIMIT CYCLES

The state variable description of an LTI system is given by 3 1O. Statement for Linked Answer Questions 3 and 4 :

Aggressive Maneuvering Flight Tests of a Miniature Robotic Helicopter

Today s Lecture. Block Diagrams. Block Diagrams: Examples. Block Diagrams: Examples. Closed Loop System 06/03/2017

into a discrete time function. Recall that the table of Laplace/z-transforms is constructed by (i) selecting to get

Feedback Control System Fundamentals

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dynamics and Control II

Friction-induced Vibration in Lead Screw Systems

THE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL TWO-DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM SEMISTRONGLY STABILIZING CONTROLLERS. Tatsuya Hoshikawa, Kou Yamada and Yuko Tatsumi

Sensorless Speed Control including zero speed of Non Salient PM Synchronous Drives Rasmussen, Henrik

Reduction of Multiple Subsystems

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Control and Dynamical Systems

Contents lecture 4. Automatic Control III. Summary of lecture 3 (II/II) Summary of lecture 3 (I/II) Lecture 4 Controller structures and control design

MM7. PID Control Design

Eigenstructure Assignment for Helicopter Hover Control

Modeling and Simulation of a Two-Mass Resonant System with Speed Controller

Lecture 10 Filtering: Applied Concepts

Stability regions in controller parameter space of DC motor speed control system with communication delays

Sensorless PM Brushless Drives

EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 1 Solution (Fall 2010) Wenjie Chen and Jansen Sheng, UC Berkeley

Figure 1: Unity Feedback System

EE 4443/5329. LAB 3: Control of Industrial Systems. Simulation and Hardware Control (PID Design) The Inverted Pendulum. (ECP Systems-Model: 505)

( 1) EE 313 Linear Signals & Systems (Fall 2018) Solution Set for Homework #10 on Laplace Transforms

Chapter 8. Root Locus Techniques

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2004 Homework 4 Solution November 14,

Transcription:

The Skeldar V-5 flight ontrol ytem Modeling, identifiation and ontrol of an unmanned heliopter Ola Härkegård LiTH, November 8, 27 Organization Saab AB Saab Aeroytem Aeronauti Flight Control Sytem Aerodynami & Flight Mehani F G 2

Airraft JAS 39 Gripen Shar Filur Skeldar V-5 3 Skeldar V-5 Unmanned heliopter for urveillane Under development Baed on APID-55 by CybAero 3.3 m 5 kg 4 2

Level of ontrol UAV pilot. Break point lit 2. High level ommand Heading, peed, altitude Adjut poition Guidane Path generation Flight Control Sytem Control 5 Deign loop Deired dynami Wind enitivity Heliopter dynami Atuator Senor Requirement Model Flight Deign parameter Deign method Controller Evaluation Analyi Simulation 6 3

Atuator 3 main rotor ervo: pith (yli pith) roll (yli roll) vertial (olletive pith) Throttle ervo: RPM Tail rotor ervo: yaw 7 Senor AHRS-GPS Rate gyro Aelerometer Magnetometer GPS Senor fuion Angular veloity Orientation Veloity (relative ground) Poition Radar altimeter Air-data ytem 8 4

Dynami 9 Modeling Air flow Aerodynami & flight mehani. Phyial modeling Linkage Engine 2. Sytem identifiation Flight data Σ: 26 th order nonlinear ro-oupled ytem Blak box model Model truture 5

Rotor dynami Flapping equation β + β + + d β = ψ Parametrization β = β + β inψ + β ( ) ( ) oψ Tip-path-plane (TPP) dynami: Ω blade pith angle body rotation 2π-periodi β + β β + β + dβ β + β + dβ + ( + d) 2β β + 2β + β β = u = u = u β Redued TPP-dynami β + β + ( + d) β = u β + β + dβ 2β β = u β + β + dβ + 2β + β = u β = u β = β τ β = β τ + u 2 u 2 Firt order dynami from input to rotor di orientation 2 6

Body dynami Pith moment F M ( k + hf) β Ditane to.g. M Spring ontant Pith dynami β M q& = J 3 Coupled rotor body dynami Mehanial feedbak Inreae tability Swah plate Stabilizer dynami Blade dynami Body dynami Pith rate Ue Ue enor enor feedbak intead? Mikado virtual flybar 4 7

Sytem id pith dynami. Etimation q 2-2 5 55 6 65 7 dpith. -. 5 55 6 65 7 Time 2 nd order ytem G 2. Validation q.4 dpith 4 Real data Model.2 G 2 -.2 29 295 3 35 Time -2 288 29 292 294 296 298 3 32 34 36 Time 5 Open loop pith dynami Kinemati u G rotor q θ g v x Moment equation Fore equation 6 8

Control deign Nonlinear ontrol MIMO ontrol Contrained ontrol Referene feedforward Adaptive ontrol Linear SISO feedbak 7 Control law Referene following Feedforward turn oordination limb yaw k r k f r k i y Remove tationary error K Artifiial damping In pith: q, θ v x, x 8 9

Feedbak Open loop dynami u G rotor q θ g v x LQ deign. Hover 2. Flight: u = k q k θθ k v k x k x q u = k q kθθ k v k v q v v x x i Are LQ robutne propertie retained? 9 Feedforward DOF ontroller Contain integral ontrol G r e F H y Nie truture BUT... lim e = lim E = lim t + FG = lim FG = Overhoot No good! 2

Solution: Set-point weighting Modified PI-ontroller ( r y) + k ( r ) u = kp β i y Set-point weight β Example: G =, kp =.3, ki =. 3 loed loop pole: -.94, -.34.4 Step Repone Pole-Zero Map.2 β =.5 Amplitude.8.6.4 β =.74 β = Imaginary Axi -.5.2 2 4 6 8 Time (e) - - -.8 -.6 -.4 -.2 Real Axi 2 Conluion Many ontrol tool ueful if you know them identifiation, LQ, phae diagram, Nyquit theorem, model redution, feedforward, anti-windup, bumple tranfer,... Dynami intuition valuable Saab need more ontrol dotor F G 22

23 2