WP 2 Romanian Report. Romanian Storage Capacity

Similar documents
WP2 country review Lithuania

History of Exploration and Exploitation of Geothermal Energy in the Zagreb Geothermal Area (Croatia)

STORAGE POTENTIAL OF POLAND (THE BALTIC BASIN) Adam Wójcicki & Jolanta Pacześna, PGI-NRI

BALOCHISTAN FOLDBELT BASIN

EGAS. Ministry of Petroleum

CO 2 GEOLOGICAL STORAGE POSSIBILITIES IN HISTRIA DEPRESSION - BLACK SEA (ROMANIA)

Deep geological structures as revealed by 3D gravity stripping: western part of the Moesian Platform, Romania

EGAS. Ministry of Petroleum

THE ANALYSIS OF SUBSIDENCE ON THE FOREDEEP AREA OF THE EAST CARPATHIANS FORELAND BASIN, SUPERADJACENT TO THE BÂRLAD DEPRESSION CIRIMPEI CLAUDIA

A STATIC 3D MODELING OF HYDROCARBONIC RESERVOIR WITH THE HELP OF RMS CASE study: THE SOUTH EAST ANTICLINE OF KHUZESTAN IRAN

Results of Preliminary Study of Shale Gas and Shale Oil Perspectives in Georgia

by Bogdan Popescu Zeta Petroleum (Romania) and Serban Veliciu - Center for Green Energy Information (Geneva)

2.1. Central Indus Basin:

Reservoir Management Background OOIP, OGIP Determination and Production Forecast Tool Kit Recovery Factor ( R.F.) Tool Kit

Sedimentary rocks. Mechanical Weathering. Weathering. Chemical weathering. Rates of weathering. Fossil Fuel Resources. Two kinds of weathering

Saulius Šliaupa, Rasa Šliaupienė (NRC, Lithuania) Uldis Nulle, Inara Nulle (LEGMC, Latvia) Alla Shogenov, Kazbulat Shogenov (IGTUT, Estonia)

Downloaded 09/15/16 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

IN POLAND. Adam WÓJCICKI. National Research Institute

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

Blocks 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 & 36/03 Southeast Offshore Vietnam

GEOLOGICAL AND HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON THE PHREATIC AQUIFER OF THE TARNAVA MICA RIVER FLOOD PLAIN AND TERRACES

Exploration, Drilling & Production

WP 4.1. Site selection criteria and ranking methodology. Karen Kirk

Understanding Earth Fifth Edition

P228 Geological Storage of CO2 Prospects in the Baltic States

Sequence Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Niobrara Formation, A Bench, Wattenberg Field, Denver Julesburg Basin, Colorado*

The development of a geo-database of caprock quality and deep saline aquifers distribution suitable to geological storage of CO 2 in Italy

1. Why we need transboundary storage? Emissions versus storage capacity CCS Legislation Results versus emissions and storage capacity

Available online at Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii Al. I. Cuza din Iasi Seria Geologie 59 (2) (2013) 61 68

entered a rapid development phase. Annual increased proven reserves are above 500 billion cubic meters (bcm) from 2003, and annual natural gas product

High-resolution Sequence Stratigraphy of the Glauconitic Sandstone, Upper Mannville C Pool, Cessford Field: a Record of Evolving Accommodation

IRAQ. Target Exploration. Geodynamic Evolutions of The Sedimentary Basins of. This study is a major reference for Petroleum

Potential Hydrocarbon Discoveries in Bjelovar Subdepression, Croatia By Tomislav Malvic 1 and Igor Rusan 2

eni s.p.a. upstream & technical services

The Importance of Malm-Neocomian Carbonate Buildups in the Hydrocarbon System of the Moesian Platform*

MIDDLE DEVONIAN PLAY MICHIGAN BASIN OF ONTARIO. Duncan Hamilton

Anthill Resources Yukon - An Update on the Einarson Project

P066 Duplex Wave Migration for Coal-bed Methane Prediction

Next steps for verifying European CO2 storage capacity Perspectives from the Baltic Region

WESTCARB Phase I Results Review

PROCEEDINGS, INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION Forty-First Annual Convention & Exhibition, May 2017

North Dakota Geological Survey

Depositional History and Petroleum Potential of Ombilin Basin, West Sumatra - Indonesia, Based on Surface Geological Data*

Block 43B - Onshore Oman

ANGOLA OFFSHORE LICENSING 2007 BLOCK 46

Poland Bełchatów: storage in an onshore saline aquifer

Lab 9: Petroleum and groundwater

Petrophysical Charaterization of the Kwale Field Reservoir Sands (OML 60) from Wire-line Logs, Niger Delta, Nigeria. EKINE, A. S.

Petroleum Systems (Part One) Source, Generation, and Migration

CO2 storage modelling and capacity estimates for the Trøndelag Platform a basin modelling approach

GEOELECTRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF MARINE INTRUSIONS ON THE ROMANIAN BLACK SEA SHORE

Study on the Four- property Relationship of Reservoirs in YK Area of Ganguyi Oilfield

Devonian Petroleum Systems and Exploration Potential, Southern Alberta, Part 3 Core Conference

ILLINOIS GROUNDWATER - BEDROCK

5 ORIGINAL HYDROCARBONS IN PLACE

REPP-CO2 Further developments at LBr-1. V. Kolejka (Czech Geological Survey)

Ministry of Oil and Minerals Petroleum Exploration & Production Authority BLOCK 85 (Al Uqlah North)

Applying Stimulation Technology to Improve Production in Mature Assets. Society of Petroleum Engineers

Opportunities in Oil and Gas Fields Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cretaceous, Dakota Formation, Terra Cotta Member South Side of I-70, Salina County, Kansas

Integrated well log and 3-D seismic data interpretation for the Kakinada area of KG PG offshore basin

Sediment and sedimentary rocks Sediment

REGIONAL GEOLOGY IN KHMER BASIN

Hydrocarbon Exploration in Morocco: Current Activities and Opportunities. H. Jabour

P1645 Fig 1: Licence P1645 Introduction

Ministry of Oil and Minerals Petroleum Exploration & Production Authority BLOCK 6 (Iryam)

Available online at Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii Al. I. Cuza din Iasi Seria Geologie 61 (1 2) (2015) 33 39

GEOLOGICAL LOG INTERPRETATION TUTORIAL

Hydrocarbon Processing Techniques

Bulletin of Earth Sciences of Thailand

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROLOGY

PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PARAMETERS VARIATION, IN RELATION WITH DEPTH AND ENE-WSW ORIENTATION OF EPICLASTICAL SEDIMENTS

NORTHEAST EL HAMD BLOCK

Section I: Multiple Choice Select the best answer to each question. Mark your final answer on the answer sheet. (1 pt each)

Reservoir Type and Main Controlling Factors of Reservoir Forming in Block T of South Buir Sag

Geoscience 001 Fall Rock Identification and Contextual Interpretation

The Ketzin Test Site (former CO 2 Sink-project)

Meandering Miocene Deep Sea Channel Systems Offshore Congo, West Africa

Official languages: French and Arabic.

Regional Capacity Estimates for Geological Storage of CO 2 in Deep Saline Aquifers Upper Miocene Sandstones in the SW part of the Pannonian Basin

COPYRIGHT. Optimization During the Reservoir Life Cycle. Case Study: San Andres Reservoirs Permian Basin, USA

Pyrenees Hold Clues to Frac

2D Seismic Interpretation and Well Log Analysis of Missakaswal Area, Upper Indus Basin, Pakistan

Pre Stack Imaging To Delineate A New Hydrocarbon Play A Case History

Core Technology for Evaluating the Bakken

5 IEAGHG CCS Summer School. Geological storage of carbon dioxide (a simple solution)

Geologic Considerations of Shallow SAGD Caprock; Seal Capacity, Seal Geometry and Seal Integrity, Athabasca Oilsands, Alberta Canada


SACCCS Test Injection Workshop

2. West Amer 2018 BID ROUND BLOCKS. Block Summary. Location : Located in the Middle of the Western flank of the Gulf of Suez. Total Area: 875.

LOW ENTHALPY GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR EXPLORATION IN THE APENNINES BURIED THRUST FRONT SOUTH OF PARMA

RELINQUISHMENT REPORT. License P1546 Block April 2009

Reservoir Rock Properties COPYRIGHT. Sources and Seals Porosity and Permeability. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

Relation between time variation of gravity field and vertical surface movements in the Pannonian basin

Risk Factors in Reservoir Simulation

Sedimentary Cycle Best Practice: Potential Eo-Oligocene Sediments in Western Indonesia*

Available online at GHGT-9. Elsevier use only: Received date here; revised date here; accepted date here

MODULE PREREQUISITES FOR HYDROCARBON ACCUMULATION

The placement of the Trans-European Suture Zone on the Romanian territory by electromagnetic arguments

CO2 Geological Storage, Hontomín site assessment. Ramon Carbonell

Transcription:

WP 2 Romanian Report Romanian Storage Capacity EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

Content 1. Romanian Sedimentary Basins 2. CO 2 Storage Possibilities in Deep Saline Aquifers 3. CO 2 Storage Possibilities in Hydrocarbon Fields 4. Romanian Case Studies EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

1. Romanian Sedimentary Basins EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

The major sedimetary structures within Romanian territory are: Pannonian Depression: Transylvanian Depression (TD) Pannonian Depression North (PDN) Pannonian Depression South (PDS) Moesian Platform: Moesian Platform West (MPW) Moesian Platform East (MPE) East Carpathians Paleogene Flysh (ECPF) Carpathians Foredeep: East Carpathians Foredeep (ECF) Diapir Fold Zone (DFZ) Getic Depresssion (GD) Moldavian Platform (MP) North Dobrogea & Predobrogean Depression (NDPD) EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

2. CO 2 Storage Possibilities in Deep Saline Aquifers EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

Structure Stratigraphic unit Formation Lithology Top depth (m) Permeabilit y (md) Moesian Platform and South Carpathians Foredeep Sarmatian Sarmatian Limestones and arenitic rocks 800 400 1000 Moesian Platform and South Carpathians Foredeep Cretaceous Cretaceous Sandstones and sandy limestones 2600 500 600 Moesian Platform and South Carpathians Foredeep Triasic Triasic Siliceous sands and sandstones 3200 40 700 Moldavian Platform and East Carpathians Foredeep Sarmatian Valea Seaca Limy sandstones 1420 0.3 160 Moldavian Platform and East Carpathians Foredeep Lower Bademian Bademian Limestones 1000 Transilvanian Depression Sarmatian Sarmatian Sands 1000 Pannonian Depression Pannonian Pannonian Silty sands 1200 EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

Structure/Zone Area (10 6 m 2 ) Thickness of aquifer (m) Net/gross ratio Effective Porosity CO 2 density (t/ m 3 ) Storage efficiency factor Total estimated CO 2 storage Capacity (Mt) Moesian Platform and South Carpathians Foredeep 38 70 20 0.65 0.04 5.2 Moldavian Platform and East Carpathians Foredeep 24 50 20 0.65 0.04 2.5 Transilvanian Depression 22 200 20 0.60 0.04 8.8 Pannonian Depression 15 70 20 0.60 0.04 2.1 Total estimated CO 2 storage capacity in deep saline aquifers (Mt) 18.6 EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

3. CO 2 Storage Possibilities in Hydrocarbon Fields EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

Geological Units Produced Mt oil Gm3gas Produced estimated % oil % gas Total Mt oil Gm3 gas Gt CO2 capacity Oil d. Gas d. Pannonian depr. 47 25 80 85 57 29 0,03 0,07 Transilvanian depr. 772 85 908 2,27 Barlad Depression 1 2 1 6 N. Dobrogean Pro. 6 13 6 13 East. Carpathians 377 90 85 90 560 100 0,34 0,25 Getic Deprssion 120 125 70 65 156 192 0,09 0,48 Moesian Platform 169 95 75 70 211 136 0,13 0,34 Total 720 1122 981 1384 0,59 3,41 Formation volume factor : Oil 1,5 Gas 0,005 CO2 density 0,5 Total 4,00 EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

4. Romanian Case Studies EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

Tataru Hydrocarbon Field EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

Location the MioPliocene Subzone in Muntenia on the internal flank of the Carpathian Foredeep Storage formation Miocene sands Structure faulted anticline oriented W E system of longitudinal and transversal faults several tectonic blocks Moetian divided in three sandy complexes Me II ( 140 150 m thick ) hydrocarbons Me int ( 25 30 m thick ) Me I ( 140 150 m thick) Pontian maximum thickness of 500 m Marls End of exploitation 2006 EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

Field X coordinates Z coordinates WOC [mbsl] Etage [m] Porosity [%] Avg water saturation [%] Avg permeability Tataru 480047.6639 5348964.1206 711 456 18 26 40 Initial pressure [atm] Initial temperature [º C] Boi [m 3 /m 3 ] Bgi [m 3 /m 3 ] O.O.I.P [kt] O.G.i.P (solved) [Mm 3 ] Producible oil [kt] Producible solved gases [Mm 3 ] CO 2 storage capacity [Mt] 40 31 1.05 0.0242 409 13 41 2 15 EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

No. Powerplant Location Longitudes Latitudes Annual emission [Mt] 1 S.C. Termoelectrica S.A. SE Doicesti SE Doicesti 25º23'36.13 44º59'48.31 0.192023 2 S.C. Petrotel Lukoil S.A. Teleajen 26º03'30.48 44º57'10.07 0.850224 3 S.C. Dalkia Thermo River SRL Point of Brazi Brazi 25º59'16.48 44º53'14.85 0.340204 4 S.C. Electrocentrale Bucharest SA SE Bucharest Bucharest West PP Bucharest 28º58'56.43 44º25'40.45 0.645957 5 S.C. Electrocentrale Bucharest SA SE Bucharest Grozavesti PP Bucharest 26º03'49.48 44º26'43.47 0.304473 6 S.C. Electrocentrale Bucharest SASE Bucharest Bucharest South PP Bucharest 26º09'16.54 44º24'35.45 1.489860 7 S.C. Electrocentrale Bucharest SA SE Bucharest Progresu PP Bucharest 25º53'16.48 44º53'14.85 0.678890 EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

Ghercesti Malu Mare Hydrocarbon Field EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

Location near the city of Craiova western part of Moesian Platform Structure anticlines oriented N S and W E Reservoir formation Middle Jurasic Formation (Dogger) Dogger I sands, limy sandstones, siliceous sandstones, limestones, dolomites, marls, shales and siderites width of 130 m at Simnic and 40 90 m at Malu Mare Dogger II mixed character breccias, micro conglomerates, siliceous sandstones, marls, limy sandstones The Pontian marly deposits of 150 200 meters thickness 30 50 meters of marly sands 20 30 meters of greyyellowish marls EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

Hydrocarbons Dogger complexes I and II Dogger I has a narrow oil band situated around the big gas cap throughout the three structures Free gas deposits are known in both complexes. Ghercesti structure four gas cap oil deposits and an oil deposit in Dogger I Carcea structure five gas cap oil deposits in Dogger I Malu Mare structure three free gas deposits and a cap gas deposit in Dogger I six free gas deposits in Dogger II Pontian formation five faults: Ghercesti, Carcea, Malu Mare and Urechesti sand bed (230 m thick) free gases in sands EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

Field Ghercesti, Dg I Carcea, Dg I Malu Mare, Dg I Malu Mare, Dg II X coordinates 298104.84 298586.10 298706.40 Z coordinates 5256299.27 5248587.40 5246659.42 WOC [m] 1584 1592 1587 GWC[m] 1573 1575 GOC[m] 1575 1575 1578 Etage [m] 190 180 100 100 Porosity [%] 22 16 14 13 Initial pressure [atm] 158 158 158 158 Initial temperature [ºC] 70 70 70 70 Boi [m 3 /m 3 ] 1.32 1.32 1.32 Bgi [m 3 /m 3 ] 0.0062 O.O.I.P [kt] 2235 2569 225 O.G.i.P (cap) [Mm 3 ] 1089 948 32 629 O.G.i.P (solved) [Mm 3 ] 408 435 35 931 Producible oil [kt] 457 716 54 Producible cap gas [Mm 3 ]] 79 232 Producible solved gases [Mm 3 ] 495 683 14 CO 2 storage capacity [Mt] 9.59 8.75 2.44 3.56 EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009

No Powerplant Location Longitudes Latitudes Annual emission [Mt] 1 S.C. Energy Complex Rovinari S.A. Rovinari 23º09'05.55 44º55'47.53 6.103822 2 S.C Govora Power Plant SA Ramnicu Valcea 24º17'12.25 45º03'05.72 1.585185 3 S.C. Energy Complex Turceni S.A. Filiasi 23º24'30.93 44º40'32.60 6.837217 4 S.C. Energy Complex Craiova S.A. SE Isalnita Isalnita 23º24'30.93 44º24'16.51 3.756033 5 S.C. Energy Complex Craiova S.A. SE Craiova II Craiova 23º48'44.79 44º20'54.34 2.022746 EU GeoCapacity Final Conference, Copenhagen, 2122 October 2009