Lecture 18: Wave-Mean Flow Interaction, Part I

Similar documents
Lecture 10: Whitham Modulation Theory

Lecture 12: Transcritical flow over an obstacle

Dynamics of Strongly Nonlinear Internal Solitary Waves in Shallow Water

Nonlinear Waves: Woods Hole GFD Program 2009

INTERNAL SOLITARY WAVES IN THE ATMOSPHERE AND OCEAN

13.42 LECTURE 2: REVIEW OF LINEAR WAVES

Figure 1: Surface waves

Strongly nonlinear long gravity waves in uniform shear flows

Transcritical flow over a hole

Long-time solutions of the Ostrovsky equation

The effect of a background shear current on large amplitude internal solitary waves

Transactions on Engineering Sciences vol 9, 1996 WIT Press, ISSN

The Evolution of Large-Amplitude Internal Gravity Wavepackets

Alongshore Momentum Balance: Currents

Making Waves in Vector Calculus

Nonlinear Wave Theory

Concepts from linear theory Extra Lecture

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS WAVES IN THE OCEANS. Wolfgang Fennel Institut für Ostseeforschung Warnemünde (IOW) an der Universität Rostock,Germany

Making Waves in Multivariable Calculus

Introduction to Marine Hydrodynamics

SECOND-ORDER PARTIAL STANDING WAVE SOLUTION FOR A SLOPING BOTTOM

Review of Fundamental Equations Supplementary notes on Section 1.2 and 1.3

Generation of undular bores and solitary wave trains in fully nonlinear shallow water theory

Periodic Solutions of the Serre Equations. John D. Carter. October 24, Joint work with Rodrigo Cienfuegos.

Lecture 9: Tidal Rectification, Stratification and Mixing

Shallow Water Gravity Waves: A Note on the Particle Orbits

Generation of Secondary Solitary Waves in the Variable-Coefficient Korteweg-de Vries Equation

Unsteady undular bores in fully nonlinear shallow-water theory

The Whitham Equation. John D. Carter April 2, Based upon work supported by the NSF under grant DMS

Chapter 3. Shallow Water Equations and the Ocean. 3.1 Derivation of shallow water equations

Lecture 11: Internal solitary waves in the ocean

Rogue Waves. Thama Duba, Colin Please, Graeme Hocking, Kendall Born, Meghan Kennealy. 18 January /25

Breather propagation in shallow water. 1 Introduction. 2 Mathematical model

Salmon: Introduction to ocean waves

Dispersion in Shallow Water

On the Whitham Equation

Evolution of solitary waves and undular bores in shallow-water flows over a gradual slope with bottom friction

Undular Bores and the Morning Glory

The shallow water equations Lecture 8. (photo due to Clark Little /SWNS)

Lecture 7: Oceanographic Applications.

Lecture 1: Introduction to Linear and Non-Linear Waves

A simple model of topographic Rossby waves in the ocean

On Vertical Variations of Wave-Induced Radiation Stress Tensor

Algebraic geometry for shallow capillary-gravity waves

Generation of solitary waves by transcritical flow over a step. Citation Journal Of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, v. 587, p

Wave Current Interactions in Finite Depth

v t + fu = 1 p y w t = 1 p z g u x + v y + w

Bottom friction effects on linear wave propagation

Transcritical Flow Over a Step

Chapter 4 Water Waves

BOUSSINESQ-TYPE EQUATIONS WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS FOR NARROW-BANDED WAVE PROPAGATION FROM ARBITRARY DEPTHS TO SHALLOW WATERS

Lecture: Wave-induced Momentum Fluxes: Radiation Stresses

INTERNAL GRAVITY WAVES

Shoaling of Solitary Waves

Theory of linear gravity waves April 1987

The Basic Properties of Surface Waves

Notes on Nearshore Physical Oceanography. Falk Feddersen SIO

( ) where the phase! is given by! = kx + mz!"t. We also know

Resonant excitation of trapped coastal waves by free inertia-gravity waves

2017 年環境流體力學短期講座 Short Course on Environmental Flows

Stability and Shoaling in the Serre Equations. John D. Carter. March 23, Joint work with Rodrigo Cienfuegos.

Flows Induced by 1D, 2D and 3D Internal Gravity Wavepackets

Fission of a weakly nonlinear interfacial solitary wave at a step

GFD 2013 Lecture 4: Shallow Water Theory

6 Two-layer shallow water theory.

Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Waves in Fluids

What we do understand by the notion of soliton or rather solitary wave is a wave prole which is very stable in the following sense

Travelling waves. Chapter 8. 1 Introduction

Internal Wave Generation and Scattering from Rough Topography

THEORETICAL AND NUMERICAL STUDY OF WAVE-CURRENT INTERACTION IN STRONGLY-SHEARED FLOWS

arxiv: v1 [math.na] 27 Jun 2017

Lecture 6: Derivation of the KdV equation for surface and internal waves

The effect of disturbances on the flows under a sluice gate and past an inclined plate

Application of linear combination between cubic B-spline collocation methods with different basis for solving the KdV equation

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

Salmon: Introduction to ocean waves

10 Shallow Water Models

13.1 Ion Acoustic Soliton and Shock Wave

Marine Hydrodynamics Lecture 19. Exact (nonlinear) governing equations for surface gravity waves assuming potential theory

Rogue Waves. Alex Andrade Mentor: Dr. Ildar Gabitov. Physical Mechanisms of the Rogue Wave Phenomenon Christian Kharif, Efim Pelinovsky

GENERATING AND ABSORBING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR COMBINED WAVE-CURRENT SIMULATIONS

Model Equation, Stability and Dynamics for Wavepacket Solitary Waves

Three-dimensional gravity-capillary solitary waves in water of finite depth and related problems. Abstract

Physics Letters A 374 (2010) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Physics Letters A.

Wave-Body Interaction Theory (Theory of Ship Waves) Lecture Notes for Graduate Course

COMPLEX SOLUTIONS FOR TSUNAMI-ASCENDING INTO A RIVER AS A BORE

Prof. dr. A. Achterberg, Astronomical Dept., IMAPP, Radboud Universiteit

B-splines Collocation Algorithms for Solving Numerically the MRLW Equation

u =c u u =g(x) u=f(x) tt xx

A new moving boundary shallow water wave equation numerical model

Derivation of Generalized Camassa-Holm Equations from Boussinesq-type Equations

Experimental study of the wind effect on the focusing of transient wave groups

Circular dispersive shock waves in colloidal media

SHIP WAVE CRESTS IN INTERMEDIATE-DEPTH WATER

A pseudo-spectral method for non-linear wave hydrodynamics

/01/04: Morrison s Equation SPRING 2004 A. H. TECHET

Nonlinear Waves over Dissipative Mud

CHAPTER 60. Shoaling and Reflection of Nonlinear Shallow Water Waves l? Padmaraj Vengayil and James T. Kirby

Dissipative effects on the resonant flow of a stratified fluid over topography

Lecture17: Generalized Solitary Waves

Transcription:

Lecture 18: Wave-Mean Flow Interaction, Part I Lecturer: Roger Grimshaw. Write-up: Hiroki Yamamoto June 5, 009 1 Introduction Nonlinearity in water waves can lead to wave breaking. We can observe easily that waves break as they come to a beach. The waves on a current also may break. In this lecture we derive modulation equations of water waves using Whitham s averaged Lagrangian method. Then we consider the interaction of nonlinear water waves with currents and slopping bottom topography (e.g. waves on a beach). Water waves in the linear approximation In the linear approximation, the surface elevation ζ for sinusoidal unidirectional waves is ζ(x,t) = acos θ, θ = kx ωt + α, (1) for waves of amplitude a, wavenumber k (> 0), and frequency ω. Here α is an arbitrary constant ensemble parameter. When there is no mean current the dispersion relation is ω = gk tanh(kh), () where g is the acceleration due to gravity and H is the mean water depth. If there is a constant horizontal mean current U, in the frame moving with the current (x = x Ut), the dispersion relation remains similar to (). Then, θ can also be written as θ = kx ωt + α = k(x + Ut) ωt + α = kx (ω ku)t + α, (3) so that the dispersion relation of water waves on a horizontal mean current, in the rest frame is ω = Uk + ω. (4) where ω is the intrinsic frequency (i.e. ω = ±[gk tanh(kh)] 1/ ), which has two branches. The total frequency ω is thus decomposed into the Doppler shift Uk and the intrinsic frequency ω. 178

3 Modulation equations of water waves Now suppose that the amplitude, wave number, frequency, mean current and mean depth vary slowly relative to the wave field. Then (1) is replaced by the Fourier series expansions as ζ(x,t) a(x,t)cos θ + a cos θ + O(a 3 ), (5) θ = φ(x,t) + α, k = φ, ω = φ t. (6) Here φ is the phase, and the ensemble parameter α is constant, and the coefficient a O(a ) depends on ω,k,u,h. It is convenient to introduce a velocity potential Ψ defined as Ψ = Ux Bt + Φ(θ,z), (7) where Φ is the wave component of Ψ, and B is related to the mean height of the waves. Now, Φ is expanded as Fourier series in the form Φ(θ,z) = A 1 cosh(kz)sin θ + A cosh(kz)sin θ + O(a 3 ), (8) where A 1 O(a) and A O(a ). This is because of the kinematic boundary condition at free surface Ψ z = ζ t + Ψ ζ. From (6), the equation for conservation of waves is, t + ω = 0. (9) The issue is to determine how the amplitude, wavenumber, frequency, mean current and mean depth vary (slowly) in space and time. The mean current U(x,t) and depth H(x,t) can be decomposed into background components u(x,t), h(x) and a wave-induced O(a ) component. The modulation equations for the wave amplitude, wavenumber, frequency, mean current and mean depth are found using Whitham s averaged Lagrangian method. The Lagrangian of the water wave system is (Whitham, 1974, chapter 13.) ζ L = h { Ψ t + 1 Substituting (7) into (10), we obtain [ ζ L = B + ω Φ θ 1 = h ( ) Ψ + 1 ( U + k Φ ) 1 θ (B 1 U ) H 1 gh + ghh ζ Φ ζ +(ω Uk) h θ dz 1 h [ ( ) Ψ + gz} dz. (10) z k ( Φ θ Note that ζ + h = H and ζ h = (ζ + h) (ζ + h)h. ( ) Φ gz] dz, z ) + ( ) ] Φ dz. (11) z 179

Averaging the Lagrangian (11) in α, we obtain L = 1 π Ldα = L (m) (U,B,H,h) + L (w) (E,ω,k,H), (1) π 0 E = ga, k = φ, ω = φ t, U = Ψ, B = Ψ t. (13) The functions L (m) (U,B,H,h) and L (w) (E,ω,k,H) are mean and wave components of averaged Lagrangian respectively. Mean : L (m) = (B )H U gh + ghh, (14) where Wave : L (w) = DE + D k E g + O(E 3 ), (15) D = ω gkt 1, D = 9T 4 10T + 9 8T 4, T = tanh(kh), ω = ω Uk. (16) These expressions are derived first by finding Ψ and thus L to get L. The coefficients A 1,A,a in (7) are obtained by solving the variational equations L A 1 = 0, L A = 0, L a = 0, (17) for A 1,A,a. The resulting Φ is then used to find Ψ (8), which is then re-substituted into L (11) and then L. See Whitham (1974, chapter 16.6) and Whitham (1967) for details. To obtain the modulation equations, the averaged variational principle δ Ldxdt = 0, (18) is used for variations in δe,δφ,δψ,δh, and we have δe : δφ : δψ : δh : L = 0, (19) E ( ) L ( ) L = 0, t ω t + ω = 0, (0) ( ) L ( ) L U = 0, t B U t + B = 0, (1) L H From (19), the dispersion relation is obtained as = 0. () D + k D E + O(E ) = 0. (3) g 180

From (1) we obtain where From () we obtain H t + Using (5) and (6), we obtain where [ ( UH + k E V = U + ka H, B = 1 U + gh gh + 1 )] (ω Uk) = H gkt t + (HV ) = 0, (4) A = L ω t (HV ) + (HV ) + ( 1 T T ( gh Uk) = E(ω. (5) gkt ) ke + O(E ). (6) ) + S = gh h, (7) S = k(f V A) + L (w) H L(w) H, L(w) F =. (8) Equation (0) can be written as A t + F = 0. (9) Now, (19), (9), (4), and (7) are the dispersion relation, the wave action equation, the mean flow and mean momentum equations of the modulation equations respectively. To these we add equation (9) for conservation of waves. t + ω = 0. (30) These equations are fully nonlinear. A is the wave action density and F is the wave action flux. In the linearized approximation (H h, U u) the dispersion relation (3) becomes D(ω,k,h) = 0, ω = ω + ku, ω = gk tanh(kh) (31) A = D E ω = E ω, F = c ga = (c g + u)a, (3) where c g = ω is the intrinsic group velocity. S is the radiation stress, which in the linearized approximation reduces to since for water waves, S = (kc g + h ω h ) A = ) (kc g ω A, (33) h ω h = kc g ω. (34) The equation for conservation of waves (30) becomes t + u = k u ω h h, Note that for steady backgrounds the frequency is conserved. ω t + u ω = k u t. (35) 181

4 Waves on a current Now we consider a unidirectional steady current u = u(x), with constant depth h. 4.1 Linear approximation In the linearized approximation (H h, U u), equation (30) becomes t + ω = 0, ω = uk + ω, ω = gk tanh(kh). (36) The steady solution is ω = ω 0 (constant), with k = k(x). The wave amplitude is obtained from the wave action equation (9), which reduces to A t + (c ga) = 0, c g = u + c g, A = E ω. (37) The steady solution has constant wave action flux F 0, c g A = c gc a tanh(kh) = F 0, c = ω k. (38) For simplicity, we now make the deep-water approximation kh, so that ω = gk, c g = c /. Suppose that u(x = 0) = 0 and the intrinsic phase speed is c = > 0 at x = 0. Then the steady solution of (36) is obtained as follows. Since ω = ω 0, Dividing (39) by k(x), we obtain u(x)k(x) + gk(x) gk(0) = 0. (39) u(x) + c (x) c (x) = 0. (40) Here we used c (x) = g/k(x), = c (0) = g/k(0). Then the solution of (40) is c (x) = c { } 1/ 0 ± u(x) +. (41) 4 The condition at x = 0 means we choose the plus sign. Note that the group velocity is c g (x) = u(x) + c = u(x) + 4 ± 1 { } 1/ u(x) +. (4) 4 Thus, for an advancing current u(x) > 0, x > 0, we must choose only the plus sign, and so c (x), c g (x) both increase as u(x) increases, while then k(x) = g/c decreases. Since c g c a = F 0, the wave amplitude decreases. For an opposing current u(x) < 0, x > 0, there is a stopping velocity at x = x c, u(x c ) = /4, and the waves cannot penetrate past this point, since c g (x c ) = 0. Instead the waves reflect, with the minus sign in (41, 4). Both c (x), c g (x) decrease as u(x) increases, while k(x) increases. Since c g c a = F 0 = c 0 a 0, the wave amplitude increases 18

from the initial value a 0, and a as x x c. Of course, this result is outside the linear approximation, and in practice the waves will break at x b < x = x c. Here we use an experimental breaking criterion, ak(x b ) = 0.44 (Miche, 1944); note that x b depends on a 0 and. Using (41, 4) and c g c a = F 0 = c 0 a 0, the wave steepness ak can be calculated as follows, where ak = a 0 k 0 (G 1 G ) 1/ G 1, (43) G 1 = 1 + ( u + 1 4) 1/, (44) G = u + 1 G 1. (45) The relation between u/ and ak (i.e. equation (43)) is shown as Figure 1. This rather simple theory has applications to the formation of giant (rogue, freak) waves in the ocean, for example on the Agulhas current. There are also applications to the modulation of water waves by an underlying internal solitary wave, whose surface current is u(x) = u 0 sech (Kx) say (Fig. ). To explore these further, we take a wave packet solution of the wave action equation (37) c g A = c g c a = c 0 a 0 b (t τ), τ = x 0 dx c g. (46) Here a 0 b(t) is the wave amplitude at x = 0, and we assume that the shape function b(t) is localized (e.g. Gaussian), varying from 0 to a maximum of 1 at t = 0. Then the waves break throughout the zone, x b < x < x c, over a time interval determined by the width of the packet. 4. Nonlinear effects In deep water, the wave-induced components of U,H are negligible and so the Lagrangian (1) becomes just (15) given now by ( ) L (w) ω E = gk 1 k E g + O(E 3 ), (47) where now ω = ω ku(x). The nonlinear dispersion relation (3) becomes ω = gk + k 3 E + O(E ). (48) Conservation of wave action (9) and conservation of waves (30) again yield for a steady solution ( t = 0) F = L(w) = F 0, ω 0 = ω + u(x)k, (49) where F 0, ω 0 are constants. When combined with (48) these yield two coupled equations for k, E in terms of u(x). Now the dispersion relation (48) depends on the amplitude, 183

Figure 1: Wave steepness ak versus u/ ; a 0 k 0 = 0.1,0. (black, blue), where a 0 k 0 are wave steepness at x = 0. Wave breaking criterion ak = 0.44 (red dash), yields breaking for u / > 0.18,0.09. Figure : Breaking waves on the internal wave current u = u 0 sech (Kx), for u 0 / = 0., 0.1 (black, blue), where the red lines give the breaking zones for a 0 k 0 = 0.1,0. (upper, lower). This shows that the waves of a 0 k 0 = 0.1 (0.) will break when they are on Kx < 0.33 (0.94) if the waves are on internal wave current indicated by black line. 184

ω = ω (k,e ) as well as the wavenumber. Conservation of wave action flux becomes / L (w) WA = F 0, W = L(w) A = L(w) ω These are combined with (48) and (49), = E ω ω (1 + k E ω = u(x) + k + k A, (50) g ). (51) ω = gk + k 3 ω A, ω 0 = ω + u(x)k, (5) to yield two equations for k, A in terms of u(x). Note that for an opposing current u(x) < 0 (x > 0) there is now no stopping velocity, as W 0, A is not allowed. The equation of wave steepness ak in terms of u(x)/ is obtained by the same method used to derive (43), but is more complicated. For convenience, we define and Then the first equation of (5) is written as so A and W can be written as follows, A = (1 E ω + k E ), g W = s(ak) = ω k A, s 0 = s(a 0 k 0 ), (53) ŝ = g + s 0 g + s. (54) ω = k(g + s), (55) c a g (g + s) (1 + a k ), (56) = u + ω k + k A, = u + c + c a k g (g + s) (1 + a k ), = u + c [ 1 + a k g (g + s) (1 + a k ) ], (57) where c = ω /k = g + s/k. Because u(x = 0) = 0, A 0 and W 0 are written as From the second equation of (5), we obtain A 0 = a g 0 (g + s 0 ) (1 + a 0k0), (58) [ 1 W 0 = + a 0 k 0 g ] (g + s 0 ) (1 + a 0 k 0 ). (59) k 0 k = c + u. (60) 185

Using (54), k 0 /k can be written as ( ) k 0 c k = ŝ. (61) From (60) and (61), we obtain the quadratic equation for c / as and its solutions are Conservation of wave action flux can be written as Multiplying (64) by (60), we obtain Substituting (56)-(59) to (65), we obtain { u + c = [ 1 + a k g ( ) c ( ) c ŝ u = 0, (6) c = 1 ± 1 + 4ŝ(u0 / ). (63) ŝ WA = W 0 A 0. (64) ( c WA + u ) ( ) k0 = W 0 A 0. (65) k ]} { c (g + s) (1 + a k ) ] [ 1 + a 0 k 0 g (g + s 0 ) (1 + a 0k 0) }( a k g c (g + s) (1 + a k ) + u ) a 0k0 g (g + s 0 ) (1 + a 0k0), (66) where c / can be calculated by (63). Because s and ŝ are functions of ak, equation (66) describes the relation between ak and u/, and it is shown as Figure 3. 5 Waves on a beach In this section, we consider the waves on a beach. We recall that the full modulation equations are L(w) F = A t + F = 0, A = L(w) ω,, (67) H t + (HV ) = 0, V = U + ka H, (68) V t + V V + g ζ + 1 S H = 0, (69) S = k(f V A) + L (w) H L(w) H, (70) t + ω = 0, (71) 186

Figure 3: Wave steepness ak versus u/ ; a 0 k 0 = 0.1,0.,0.3 (black, blue,red); wave breaking criterion ak = 0.44 (red dash) yields breaking for u / > 0.7,0.1,0.13. The dash line is the linear solution for a 0 k 0 = 0.1. where and L (w) = DE D = + D k E g + O(E 3 ), (7) ω gk tanh(kh) 1, ω = ω Uk. (73) The mean momentum equation (69) has been rewritten. Suppose that h = h(x) 0 as x 0, and that there is no background current. Then the steady solution ( t = 0) of these modulation equations yields the dispersion relation (71, 73), constant frequency ω = ω 0, and constant wave action flux and zero mass transport, L(w) = F 0, V = U + ka H = 0, ω = ω 0 Uk. (74) Thus there is a mean Eulerian flow U = ka/h, opposing the Stokes drift due to the waves. The mean momentum equation (69) then yields the wave set-up ζ, g ζ + 1 S H = 0, From (74), S as known in terms of H, and so S = kf 0 + L (w) H L(w) H. (75) x 1 S H gζ = H dx = 1 S dh. (76) H H 187

To illustrate, first make the small amplitude approximation. Then ω ω 0, H h, so that the dispersion relation becomes ω0 = gk tanh(kh) and yields k = k(h), D = 0. The constant wave action flux condition reduces to c g a = c g0 a 0, (77) where subscript 0 indicates the values at the depth h = h 0 offshore. The expression (76) can be written as follows. At first, we consider the total derivative of D. Now D can be considered as D = D(k(h), h), so Because using (78) we obtain L (w) h = E dd dh = D h + D h D h, L (w) L (w) Using (80), 1 S h h becomes { 1 S h h = 1 kf 0 h h { Then, (76) becomes = 1 h = L (w) h. = E = 0. (78) D = F 0, (79) h = F 0 h. (80) ( h L(w) h )} F 0 h L(w) h L (w) h h, }, gζ h 1 S = h h dh, h L (w) = h dh, = L(w) h, = 1 ( 1 tanh ) (kh) ke, tanh(kh) = 1 ( sinh (kh) + cosh (kh) sinh(kh) cosh(kh) ) ke, = ke sinh(kh), (81) 188

so that, ka ζ = sinh(kh), (8) where ζ 0 = 0. This is always negative, and so is a set-down. In shallow water kh 0, c g (gh) 1/, and ( ) k 1/ ( ) h0 a 1/4 h0,, (83) k 0 h a 0 h so that, (8) can be approximated by ζ a 4h = a 0 h1/ 0. (84) 4h3/ Since this small-amplitude theory predicts infinite amplitudes as h 0, we must consider nonlinear effects. One option is to impose an empirical wave-breaking condition a/h = 0.44 (Thornton and Guza, 198, 1983), which defines the depth h = h b, beyond which there is a surf zone. Here, we shall examine nonlinear effects in h > h b in the shallow water approximation kh 0. Then the Lagrangian (7) becomes L (w) DE 9E ω 16gk H4, D ghk (1 + k H 3 ) 1. (85) This Lagrangian is only valid when ak k 3 H 3, that is, for a very small Stokes number (Stokes, 1847). Using the linear shallow water expressions (83) we require that S 0 = a 0 /k 0 h3 0 (h/h 0) 9/4, which must fail as h 0. Hence, we infer that in shallow water we need to use a new theory, valid for Stokes number of order unity, so we consider the Korteweg-de Vries model next. The Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation for weakly nonlinear long water waves, propagating on a constant undisturbed mean depth H, is given by (Mei, 1983, chapter 11.5.3) ζ t + c ζ 0 + 3 H ζ ζ + H 3 ζ 6 3 = 0, = (gh) 1/. (86) The KdV balance has linear dispersion, represented by H 3 3 ζ, balanced by nonlinearity, 3 represented by ζ ζ. To leading order, the waves propagate unchanged in form with the linear long wave speed = (gh) 1/. Nonlinearity leads to wave steepening, opposed by wave dispersion, resulting in the KdV balance and the well-known solitary wave ζ = a s sech [κ(x ct)], c 1 = a s H = κ H. (87) 3 The periodic wave solution of KdV equation (86) is ζ = a [ b(m) + cn (γθ;m) ], b = 1 m m E(m) mk(m), ω = θ t, a H = 3 mγ (kh), k = θ, (88) γ = K(m) π, (89) 189

c = ω k = { 1 + a [ m H m 3E(m) ]}, (90) mk(m) Here cn(x; m) is the elliptic function of modulus m where 0 < m < 1, and K(m), E(m) are elliptic integrals of the first and second kind. The amplitude is a and the mean value is 0. As m 1, this solution becomes a solitary wave, since then b 0 and cn (x) sech (x). As m 0, γ 1/, and it reduces to sinusoidal waves of small amplitude a m. This cnoidal wave (88) contains two free parameters; we take these to be the amplitude a and the wavenumber k. We now use the cnoidal wave expression (88) to evaluate the averaged Lagrangian (1), incorporating a mean current U, ( ) L (w) c = gh 1 G(m) E + O(E ), E = ga (91) where or G(m) = 8(< cn 4 (γθ;m) > b ), (9) G(m) = 8[EK(4 m) 3E K (1 m)] 3K m. (93) To leading order the phase speed c = W = (gh) 1/, while the wave action density, wave action flux and radiation stress now become, to leading order A = L(w) ω = G(m)E ω, F = ω(w) S = 3ω A = (U + c )A, (94) = 3G(m)E. (95) As before, we now seek the steady solutions ( t = 0), so again ω = ω 0 is the constant wave frequency, and to leading order kh 1/ = k 0 h 1/ 0 is constant. Next F = F 0 is the constant wave action flux, implying that, to leading order in wave amplitude, h 1/ G(m)a = constant. (96) Then using the expression (89) we find that a mk k h 3 and so finally we get that G(m) = K 4 m G(m) = constant h 9/. (97) The wave amplitude determined from (96, 97) is shown in Figure 4. As m 0, G 1, G m, and so m h 9/4, a h 1/4 which is the linear Green s law (Green, 1837) result. But, as m 1, G K 1, G K 3, a h 1. Wave set-up is found from (69, 95) and is given by gζ = 1 S h, S = 3ωA = 3G(m)E. (98) 190

Figure 4: The wave amplitude is determined from (96, 97). The plots are for an initial modulus m 0 = 0.1,0.5 (black, blue), while the linear solution ζ h 1/4 is the red curve. But since the wave frequency ω = k, = (gh) 1/ and the wave action flux A are conserved (see (96)), we readily find that ζ = a G(m) 4h = a 0h 1/ 0 G(m 0 ) 4h 3/, (99) This is just the linear law again, and is independent of how the wave amplitude varies. Note that for a 0 /h 0 1, m 0 0, G(m 0 ) 1. References [1] G. A. El, R. H. J. Grimshaw, and A. M. Kamchatnov, Evolution of solitary waves and undular bores in shallow-water ows over a gradual slope with bottom friction, J. Fluid Mech., 585 (007), pp. 13 44. [] G. Green, On the motion of waves in a variable canal of small depth and width, Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 6 (1837), pp. 457 46. [3] R. H. J. Grimshaw, Wave action and wave-mean flow interaction, with application to stratied shear flows, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 16 (1984), pp. 11 44. [4] C. C. Mei, The Applied Dynamics of Ocean Surface Waves, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1983. [5] R. Miche, Mouvements ondulatoires des mers en profundeur constante on décroisante form limte de la houle lors ds son déferlement. application aux digues marities, Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, 114 (1944), pp. 5 78, 131 164, 70 9, 369 406. 191

[6] G. G. Stokes, On the theory of oscillatory waves, Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 8 (1847), pp. 441 455. [7] E. B. Thornton and R. T. Guza, Energy saturation and phase speeds measured on a natural beach, Journal of Geophysical Research, 84 (198), pp. 9499 9508. [8], Transformation of wave height distribution, Journal of Geophysical Research, 88 (1983), pp. 595 5938. [9] G. B. Whitham, Non-linear dispersion of water waves, J. Fluid Mech., 7 (1967), pp. 399 41. [10], Linear and Nonlinear Waves, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1974. 19