BLOCKS OF THE GROTHENDIECK RING OF EQUIVARIANT BUNDLES ON A FINITE GROUP

Similar documents
The Ring of Monomial Representations

MODULAR SPECIES AND PRIME IDEALS FOR THE RING OF MONOMIAL REPRESENTATIONS OF A FINITE GROUP #

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009

Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules

LANDAU S THEOREM, FIELDS OF VALUES FOR CHARACTERS, AND SOLVABLE GROUPS arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 26 Jun 2015

Representations and Linear Actions

DUALITY, CENTRAL CHARACTERS, AND REAL-VALUED CHARACTERS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE

NAVARRO VERTICES AND NORMAL SUBGROUPS IN GROUPS OF ODD ORDER

Determination of Conjugacy Class Sizes from Products of Characters

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS

Character values and decomposition matrices of symmetric groups

On the Grothendieck Ring of a Hopf Algebra

Normal Supercharacter Theory

A note on the basic Morita equivalences

Modular representation theory

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

On Conditions for an Endomorphism to be an Automorphism

THREE CASES AN EXAMPLE: THE ALTERNATING GROUP A 5

FIXED POINT SETS AND LEFSCHETZ MODULES. John Maginnis and Silvia Onofrei Department of Mathematics, Kansas State University

Modular representations of symmetric groups: An Overview

LECTURE NOTES AMRITANSHU PRASAD

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

New York Journal of Mathematics. Cohomology of Modules in the Principal Block of a Finite Group

Conjugacy Classes in Semisimple Algebraic Groups (Revisions)

Math 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups

On the Irreducibility of the Commuting Variety of the Symmetric Pair so p+2, so p so 2

SEMI-INVARIANTS AND WEIGHTS OF GROUP ALGEBRAS OF FINITE GROUPS. D. S. Passman P. Wauters University of Wisconsin-Madison Limburgs Universitair Centrum

THE 2-MODULAR DECOMPOSITION MATRICES OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS S 15, S 16, AND S 17

ON SOME PARTITIONS OF A FLAG MANIFOLD. G. Lusztig

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.co] 7 Jan 2005

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

Shintani lifting and real-valued characters

CONJECTURES ON CHARACTER DEGREES FOR THE SIMPLE THOMPSON GROUP

`-modular Representations of Finite Reductive Groups

Noetherian property of infinite EI categories

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

Character Sheaves and GGGRs

The Major Problems in Group Representation Theory

EXTENSIONS OF ABSOLUTE VALUES

Landau s Theorem for π-blocks of π-separable groups

Zeta Functions of Burnside Rings for Symmetric and Alternating Groups

Odds and ends on equivariant cohomology and traces

A partition of the set of enhanced Langlands parameters of a reductive p-adic group

A PROOF OF BURNSIDE S p a q b THEOREM

On the classication of algebras

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

On exceptional completions of symmetric varieties

Primitive Ideals of Semigroup Graded Rings

Lifting to non-integral idempotents

A short proof of Klyachko s theorem about rational algebraic tori

Lifting Smooth Homotopies of Orbit Spaces of Proper Lie Group Actions

1 Rings 1 RINGS 1. Theorem 1.1 (Substitution Principle). Let ϕ : R R be a ring homomorphism

Mathematical Research Letters 3, (1996) EQUIVARIANT AFFINE LINE BUNDLES AND LINEARIZATION. Hanspeter Kraft and Frank Kutzschebauch

Maximal Class Numbers of CM Number Fields

A Version of the Grothendieck Conjecture for p-adic Local Fields

where c R and the content of f is one. 1

Pseudo Sylow numbers

COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA

Character Sheaves and GGGRs

RAPHAËL ROUQUIER. k( )

CHARACTERS OF SL 2 (F q )

On some modules associated with Galois orbits by Victor Alexandru (1), Marian Vâjâitu (2), Alexandru Zaharescu (3)

The Morozov-Jacobson Theorem on 3-dimensional Simple Lie Subalgebras

COUNTING SEPARABLE POLYNOMIALS IN Z/n[x]

Heights of characters and defect groups

On p-monomial Modules over Local Domains

Zeta Function of the Burnside Ring for Cyclic Groups

DEGREE OF EQUIVARIANT MAPS BETWEEN GENERALIZED G-MANIFOLDS

Characters and triangle generation of the simple Mathieu group M 11

SEMISIMPLE SYMPLECTIC CHARACTERS OF FINITE UNITARY GROUPS

CHARACTER EXPANSIVENESS IN FINITE GROUPS

FOCAL SUBGROUPS OF FUSION SYSTEMS AND CHARACTERS OF HEIGHT ZERO

Irreducible subgroups of algebraic groups

RANK AND PERIOD OF PRIMES IN THE FIBONACCI SEQUENCE. A TRICHOTOMY

Generic Picard-Vessiot extensions for connected by finite groups Kolchin Seminar in Differential Algebra October 22nd, 2005

for all i = 1,..., k and we are done.

Representations of Totally Disconnected Groups

SPLITTING FIELDS OF CHARACTERISTIC POLYNOMIALS IN ALGEBRAIC GROUPS

Rings With Topologies Induced by Spaces of Functions

Artin s and Brauer s Theorems on Induced. Characters

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 16 Nov 2009

SELF-EQUIVALENCES OF THE DERIVED CATEGORY OF BRAUER TREE ALGEBRAS WITH EXCEPTIONAL VERTEX

Essays on representations of p-adic groups. Smooth representations. π(d)v = ϕ(x)π(x) dx. π(d 1 )π(d 2 )v = ϕ 1 (x)π(x) dx ϕ 2 (y)π(y)v dy

School of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5836 Galois Theory. Handout 0: Course Information

Decompositions of Modules and Comodules

Factorization of integer-valued polynomials with square-free denominator

Lecture 4 Super Lie groups

Math 250: Higher Algebra Representations of finite groups

CHARACTER DEGREE SUMS IN FINITE NONSOLVABLE GROUPS

arxiv: v2 [math.qa] 6 Nov 2008

ON VARIETIES IN WHICH SOLUBLE GROUPS ARE TORSION-BY-NILPOTENT

NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS

A Class of Z4C-Groups

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Solutions of exercise sheet 6

AN ALGEBRAIC APPROACH TO GENERALIZED MEASURES OF INFORMATION

z-classes in finite groups of conjugate type (n, 1)

Group Theory. 1. Show that Φ maps a conjugacy class of G into a conjugacy class of G.

SUMMARY ALGEBRA I LOUIS-PHILIPPE THIBAULT

Transcription:

NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 48 (2018), 157-163 BLOCKS OF THE GROTHENDIECK RING OF EQUIVARIANT BUNDLES ON A FINITE GROUP Cédric Bonnafé (Received January 20, 2015) Abstract. If G is a finite group, the Grothendieck group K G (G) of the category of G-equivariant C-vector bundles on G (for the action of G on itself by conjugation) is endowed with a structure of (commutative) ring. If K is a sufficiently large extension of Q p and O denotes the integral closure of Z p in K, the K-algebra KK G (G) = K Z K G (G) is split semisimple. The aim of this paper is to describe the O-blocks of the O-algebra OK G (G). 1. Notation, Introduction 1.1. Groups. We fix in this paper a finite group G, a prime number p and a finite extension K of the p-adic field Q p such that KH is split for all subgroups H of G. We denote by O the integral closure of Z p in K, by p the maximal ideal of O, by k the residue field of O (i.e. k = O/p) We denote by Irr(KG) the set of irreducible characters of G (over K). A p-element (respectively p -element) of G is an element whose order is a power of p (respectively prime to p). If g G, we denote by g p and g p the unique elements of G such that g = g p g p = g p g p, g p is a p-element and g p is a p -element. The set of p-elements (respectively p -elements) of G is denoted by G p (respectively G p ). If X is a G-set (i.e. a set endowed with a left G-action), we denote by [G\X] a set of representatives of G-orbits in X. The reader can check that we will use formulas like f(x) x [G\X] (or families like (f(x)) x [G\X] ) only whenever f(x) does not depend on the choice of the representative x in its G-orbit. If X is a set-g (i.e. a set endowed with a right G-action), we define similarly [X/G] and will use it according to the same principles. 1.2. Blocks. A block idempotent of kg (respectively OG) is a primitive idempotent of the center Z(kG) (respectively Z(OG)) of OG. We denote by Blocks(kG) (respectively Blocks(OG)) the set of block idempotents of kg (respectively OG). Reduction modulo p induces a bijection Blocks(OG) Blocks(kG), e ē (whose inverse is denoted by e ẽ). 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification 14E05. Key words and phrases: Grothendieck group, G-equivariant C-vector bundles. The author is partly supported by the ANR (Project No ANR-12-JS01-0003-01 ACORT).

158 CÉDRIC BONNAFÉ A p-block of G is a subset B of Irr(G) such that B = Irr(KGe), for some block idempotent e of OG. 1.3. Fourier coefficients. Let IrrPairs(G) = {(g, γ) g G and γ Irr(KC G (g))} and BlPairs p (G) = {(s, e) s G p and e Blocks(OC G (s))}. The group G acts (on the left) on these two sets by conjugation. We set M(G) = [G\IrrPairs(G)] and M p (G) = [G\BlPairs(G)]. If (g, γ), (h, η) IrrPairs(G), we define, following Lusztig [3, 2.5(a)], { (g, γ), (h, η) } = 1 C G (g) C G (h) x G γ(xhx 1 )η(x 1 g 1 x). Note that { (g, γ), (h, η) } depends only on the G-orbit of (g, γ) and on the G-orbit of (h, η). 1.4. Vector bundles. Except from Proposition 2.3 below, all the definitions, all the results in this subsection can be found in [3, 2]. We denote by Bun G (G) the category of G-equivariant finite dimensional K-vector bundles on G (for the action of G by conjugation). Its Grothendieck group K G (G) is endowed with a ring structure. For each (g, γ) M(G), let V g,γ be the isomorphism class (in K G (G)) of the simple object in Bun G (G) associated with (g, γ), as in [3, 2.5] (it is denoted U g,γ there). Then K G (G) = ZV g,γ. (g,γ) M(G) The K-algebra KK G (G) = K Z K G (G) is split semisimple and commutative. Its simple modules (which have dimension one) are also parametrized by M(G): if (g, γ) M(G), the K-linear map defined by Ψ g,γ : KK G (G) K Ψ g,γ (V h,η ) = C G(g) { (h 1, η), (g, γ) } is a morphism of K-algebras and all morphisms of K-algebras KK G (G) K are obtained in this way. We define similarly block idempotents of kk G (G) and OK G (G), as well as p- blocks of M(G) Irr(KK G (G)).

BLOCKS OF THE GROTHENDIECK RING 159 1.5. Brauer maps. Let Λ denote one of the two rings O or k. If g G (and if we set s = g p ), we denote by Br Λ g the Λ-linear map Br Λ g : ΛC G (s) ΛC G (g) such that Br Λ g (h) = { h if h C G (g), 0 if h C G (g), for all h C G (s). Recall [2, Lemma 15.32] that (1.1) Br k g induces a morphism of algebras Z(kC G (s)) Z(kC G (g)). Therefore, if e Blocks(OC G (s)), then Br k g(e) is an idempotent of Z(kC G (g)) (possibly equal to zero) and we can write it a sum Br k g(e) = e 1 + + e n, where e 1,..., e n are pairwise distinct block idempotents of kc G (g). We then set β O g (e) = n ẽ i. It is an idempotent (possibly equal to zero, possibly non-primitive) of Z(OC G (g)). i=1 1.6. The main result. In order to state more easily our main result, it will be more convenient (though it is not strictly necessary) to fix a particular set of representatives of conjugacy classes of G. Hypothesis and notation. From now on, and until the end of this paper, we denote by: [G p / ] a set of representatives of conjugacy classes of p -elements in G. [G / ] a set of representatives of conjugacy classes of elements of G such that, for all g [G/ ], g p [G p / ]. We also assume that, if (g, γ) M(G) or (s, e) M p (G), then g [G/ ] and s [G p / ]. If (s, e) M p (G), we define B G (s, e) to be the set of pairs (g, γ) M(G) such that: (1) g p = s. (2) γ Irr(KC G (g)β O g (e)). Theorem 1.2. The map (s, e) B G (s, e) induces a bijection between M p (G) to the set of p-blocks of M(G).

160 CÉDRIC BONNAFÉ 2. Proof of Theorem 1.2 2.1. Central characters and congruences. If (g, γ) IrrPairs(G), we denote by ω g,γ : Z(KC G (g)) K the central character associated with γ (if z Z(KC G (g)), then ω g,γ (z) is the scalar through which z acts on an irreducible KC G (g)-module affording the character γ). It is a morphism of algebras: when restricted to Z(OC G (g)), it has values in O. If h C G (g), we denote by Σ g (h) conjugacy class of h in C G (g) and we set ˆΣ g (h) = v Z(OC G (g)). We have v Σ g(h) (2.1) ω g,γ (ˆΣg (h) ) = Σ g(h) γ(h). We also recall the following classical results: Proposition 2.2. If g G and γ, γ are two irreducible characters of C G (g), then γ and γ lie in the same p-block of C G (g) if and only if ω g,γ (ˆΣ g (h)) ω g,γ (ˆΣ g (h)) for all h C G (g). Proposition 2.3. Let (g, γ) and (g, γ ) be two elements of M(G). Then (g, γ) and (g, γ ) belong to the same p-block of M(G) if and only if Ψ g,γ (V h,η ) Ψ g,γ (V h,η) for all (h, η) M(G). 2.2. Around the Brauer map. As Brauer maps are morphisms of algebras, we have Br p g(e) = 1, and so e Blocks(kC G (g p )) (2.4) The family ( B G (g, e) ) (g,e) M p (G) is a partition of M(G). Now, let (g, γ) M(G) and let s = g p. If e Blocks(OC G (s)) is such that γ Irr(KC G (g)β O g (e)), and if σ Irr(KC G (s)e), then [2, Lemma 15.44] (2.5) ω s,σ (z) ω g,γ ( Br O g (z) ) for all z Z(OC G (s)).

BLOCKS OF THE GROTHENDIECK RING 161 2.3. Rearranging the formula for Ψ g,γ. If (g, γ), (h, η) IrrPairs(g) then (2.6) Ψ g,γ (V h,η ) = η(x 1 gx)ω g,γ (ˆΣg (xhx 1 ) ). Proof. By definition, Ψ g,γ (V h,η ) = x [C G (g)\g/c G (h)] 1 C G (h) = 1 x [G/C G (h)] x G η(x 1 gx)γ(xhx 1 ) η(x 1 gx)γ(xhx 1 ). Now, if x G is such that xhx 1 C G (g) and if u C G (g), then η ( (ux) 1 g(ux) ) γ ( (ux)h(ux)x 1) = η(x 1 gx)γ(xhx 1 ). So we can gather the terms in the last sum according to their C G (g)-orbit. We get Ψ g,γ (V h,η ) = η(x 1 C G (g) gx) C G (g) xc G (h)x 1 γ(xhx 1 ). x [C G (g)\g/c G (h)] But, for x in G such that xhx 1 C G (g), so the result follows from 2.1. C G (g) C G (g) xc G (h)x 1 = Σ g(xhx 1 ), Corollary 2.7. Let g [G/ ] and let γ, γ Irr(KC G (g)) lying in the same p-block of C G (g). Then (g, γ) and (g, γ ) lie in the same p-block of M(G). Proof. This follows from 2.6 and Proposition 2.3. 2.4. p -part. Fix (g, γ) M(G). Then it follows from 2.6 that, for all χ Irr(KG), (2.8) Ψ g,γ (V 1,χ ) = χ(g). Proposition 2.9. Let (g, γ) and (h, η) be two elements in M(G) which lie in the same p-block. Then g p = h p. Proof. By Proposition 2.3 and Equality 2.8, it follows from the hypothesis that χ(g) χ(h) for all χ Irr(KG). Hence g p and h p are conjugate in G (see [1, Proposition 2.14]), so they are equal according to our conventions explained in 1.6.

162 CÉDRIC BONNAFÉ Proposition 2.10. Let s G p and let σ, σ Irr(KC G (s)). Then (s, σ) and (s, σ ) lie in the same p-block if and only if σ and σ lie in the same p-block of C G (s). Proof. The if part has been proved in Corollary 2.7. Conversely, assume that (s, σ) and (s, σ ) lie in the same p-block. Fix h C G (s). Then s C G (h). Let η s,h : C G (h) K be the class function on C G (h) defined by: { 1 if g p and s are conjugate in C G (h), η s,h (g) = 0 otherwise. It follows from [1, Proposition 2.20] that η s,h O Irr(KC G (h)). Therefore, by 2.6 and Proposition 2.3, (#) ( η s,h (x 1 sx) ω s,σ (ˆΣg (xhx 1 )) ω s,σ (ˆΣ g (xhx 1 ) )) 0. xhx 1 C G (s) Now, let x G be such that xhx 1 C G (s). Since x 1 sx is also a p -element, η s,h (x 1 sx) = 1 if and only if s and x 1 sx are conjugate in C G (h) that is, if and only if x C G (s)c G (h). So it follows from (#) that ω s,σ (ˆΣ g (h)) ω s,σ (ˆΣ g (h)) for all h C G (s). This shows that σ and σ lie in the same p-block of C G (s). 2.5. Last step. We shall prove here the last intermediate result: Proposition 2.11. Let (s, e) M p (G) and let (g, γ), (g, γ ) B G (s, e). Then (g, γ) and (g, γ ) are in the same p-block of M(G). Proof. We fix σ Irr(KC G (s)e). It is sufficient to show that (g, γ) and (s, σ) are in the same p-block of M(G). For this, let (h, η) M(G). By Proposition 2.9, we have g p = s, so C G (g) C G (s). So 2.6 can be rewritten: Ψ g,γ (V h,η ) = η(y 1 gy)ω g,γ (ˆΣ g (yhy 1 )). y [C G (g)\c G (s)xc G (h)/c G (h)] yhy 1 C G (g) Now, let x [C G (s)\g/c G (h)] and y [C G (g)\c G (s)xc G (h)/c G (h)] be such that yhy 1 C G (g). Then yhy 1 C G (s) and so xhx 1 C G (s). Moreover y 1 sy is conjugate to x 1 sx in C G (h). Finally, it is well-known (and easy to prove) that η(y 1 hy) η(y 1 sy) (see for instance [1, Proposition 2.14]). Therefore: ( ) Ψ g,γ (V h,η ) ( η(x 1 sx) ω g,γ xhx 1 C G (s) y [C G (g)\c G (s)xc G (h)/c G (h)] yhy 1 C G (g) ) ˆΣ g (yhy 1 ).

BLOCKS OF THE GROTHENDIECK RING 163 Now, let x [C G (s)\g/c G (h)] be such that xhx 1 C G (s). Then, by definition of the Brauer map, ( ) Br O g (ˆΣ s (xhx 1 )) = ˆΣ g ((zx)h(zx) 1 ). z [C G (g)\c G (s)/(c G (s) C G (xhx 1 ))] z(xhx 1 )z 1 C G (g) But (zx) z [CG (g)\c G (s)/(c G (s) C G (xhx 1 ))] is a set of representatives of double classes in C G (g)\c G (s)xc G (h)/c G (h). So it follows from ( ) and ( ) that Ψ g,h (V h,η ) η(x 1 ( sx) ω g,γ Br O g (ˆΣ s (xhx 1 )) ). xhx 1 C G (s) Using now 2.5 and 2.6, we obtain that as desired. Ψ g,h (V h,η ) Ψ s,σ (V h,η ), Proof of Theorem 1.2. Let (s, e) and (s, e ) be two elements of M p (G) such that B G (s, e) and B G (s, e ) are contained in the same p-block of M(G) (see Proposition 2.11). Let σ Irr ( KC G (s)e ) and σ Irr ( KC G (s )e ). Then (s, σ) and (s, σ ) are in the same p-block, so it follows from Proposition 2.9 that s = s and it follows from Proposition 2.10 that γ and γ are in the same p-block of C G (s), that is e = e. This completes the proof of Theorem 1.2. References [1] C. Bonnafé, On the character ring of a finite group, Publ. Math. Univ. Franche- Comté, (2006), 5-23. [2] I. M. Isaacs, Character Theory of Finite Groups, Pure and Applied Mathematics 69, Academic Press, New York-London, 1976. [3] G. Lusztig, Leading coefficients of character values of Hecke algebras, in The Arcata Conference on Representations of Finite Groups (Arcata, Calif., 1986), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 47, Part 2 (1987), 235-262; Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1987. Cédric Bonnafé Institut Montpelliérain Alexander Grothendieck (CNRS: UMR 5149), Université Montpellier 2, Case Courrier 051, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 MONTPELLIER Cedex, FRANCE cedric.bonnafe@umontpellier.fr