Lattice Design in Particle Accelerators

Similar documents
Introduction to Transverse Beam Optics. II.) Twiss Parameters & Lattice Design

Lattice Design in Particle Accelerators Bernhard Holzer, CERN. 1952: Courant, Livingston, Snyder: Theory of strong focusing in particle beams

Lattice Design II: Insertions Bernhard Holzer, DESY

Lattice Design II: Insertions Bernhard Holzer, CERN

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Transverse Beam Dynamics II

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Introduction to Particle Accelerators Bernhard Holzer, DESY

Introduction to Transverse Beam Dynamics

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Practical Lattice Design

Transverse Dynamics II

E. Wilson - CERN. Components of a synchrotron. Dipole Bending Magnet. Magnetic rigidity. Bending Magnet. Weak focusing - gutter. Transverse ellipse

Transverse dynamics. Transverse dynamics: degrees of freedom orthogonal to the reference trajectory

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Accelerator Physics. Elena Wildner. Transverse motion. Benasque. Acknowldements to Simon Baird, Rende Steerenberg, Mats Lindroos, for course material

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

LECTURE 7. insertion MATCH POINTS. Lattice design: insertions and matching

Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Introduction to particle accelerators

Particle Accelerators: Transverse Beam Dynamics

Practical Lattice Design

Introduction to Accelerators

Introduction to Accelerator Physics 2011 Mexican Particle Accelerator School

Magnets and Lattices. - Accelerator building blocks - Transverse beam dynamics - coordinate system

PBL SCENARIO ON ACCELERATORS: SUMMARY

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

Longitudinal Dynamics

Putting it all together

Introduction to Transverse Beam Dynamics

Medical Linac. Block diagram. Electron source. Bending magnet. Accelerating structure. Klystron or magnetron. Pulse modulator.

COMBINER RING LATTICE

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **

HIRFL STATUS AND HIRFL-CSR PROJECT IN LANZHOU

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

Three Loose Ends: Edge Focusing; Chromaticity; Beam Rigidity.

An Introduction to Particle Accelerators. v short

TWISS FUNCTIONS. Lecture 1 January P.J. Bryant. JUAS18_01- P.J. Bryant - Lecture 1 Twiss functions

Conceptual design of an accumulator ring for the Diamond II upgrade

Engines of Discovery

Thu June 16 Lecture Notes: Lattice Exercises I

Bernhard Holzer, DESY-HERA-PETRA III / CERN-LHC

S1: Particle Equations of Motion S1A: Introduction: The Lorentz Force Equation

LIS section meeting. PS2 design status. Y. Papaphilippou. April 30 th, 2007

Beam Transfer Lines. Brennan Goddard CERN

Accelerator Physics Homework #7 P470 (Problems: 1-4)

Low Emittance Machines

Effect of Insertion Devices. Effect of IDs on beam dynamics

Low Emittance Machines

Lattices and Emittance

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

CI Courses / Winter 2016

Introduction to Collider Physics

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

Linear Imperfections Oliver Bruning / CERN AP ABP

Operational Experience with HERA

Lund/Barnard USPAS Problem 1

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 26 May 2017

Preliminary design study of JUICE. Joint Universities International Circular Electronsynchrotron

Small Synchrotrons. Michael Benedikt. CERN, AB-Department. CAS, Zeegse, 30/05/05 Small Synchrotrons M. Benedikt 1

Basic Mathematics and Units

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

Phase Space Study of the Synchrotron Oscillation and Radiation Damping of the Longitudinal and Transverse Oscillations

Introduction to Longitudinal Beam Dynamics

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

ELECTRON DYNAMICS WITH SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

The LHC. Part 1. Corsi di Dottorato Corso di Fisica delle Alte Energie Maggio 2014 Per Grafstrom CERN and University of Bologna

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

2008 JINST 3 S Main machine layout and performance. Chapter Performance goals

PBL (Problem-Based Learning) scenario for Accelerator Physics Mats Lindroos and E. Métral (CERN, Switzerland) Lund University, Sweden, March 19-23,

A Project to convert TLS Booster to hadron accelerator 1. Basic design. 2. The injection systems:

EFFECT OF THE FIRST AXIAL FIELD SPECTROMETER IN THE CERN INTERSECTING STORAGE RINGS (ISR) ON THE CIRCULATING BEAMS

Part II Effect of Insertion Devices on the Electron Beam

IOTA Integrable Optics Test Accelerator at Fermilab. Sergei Nagaitsev May 21, 2012 IPAC 2012, New Orleans

Beam losses versus BLM locations at the LHC

Overview. Basic Accelerator Principles : units and equations. acceleration concepts. storage rings. trajectory stability.

!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS

Lecture 2: Modeling Accelerators Calculation of lattice functions and parameters. X. Huang USPAS, January 2015 Hampton, Virginia

ÆThe Betatron. Works like a tranformer. Primary winding : coils. Secondary winding : beam. Focusing from beveled gap.

Part V Undulators for Free Electron Lasers

Minimum emittance superbend lattices?

Low Emittance Machines

MAGNET SYSTEMS FOR LARGE PARTICLE ACCELERATORS

LOW EMITTANCE MODEL FOR THE ANKA SYNCHROTRON RADIATION SOURCE

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

Hill s equations and. transport matrices

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Compressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.

Introduction to accelerators for teachers (Korean program) Mariusz Sapiński CERN, Beams Department August 9 th, 2012

Physics 598ACC Accelerators: Theory and Applications

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

The FFAG Return Loop for the CBETA Energy Recovery Linac

Introduction to Accelerator Physics

RING-RING DESIGN. Miriam Fitterer, CERN - KIT for the LHeC study group

Transcription:

Lattice Design in Particle Accelerators Bernhard Holzer, DESY Historical note:... Particle acceleration where lattice design is not needed 4 N ntz e i N( θ ) = * 4 ( 8πε ) r K sin 0 ( θ / ) uo P Rutherford Scattering, 906 Using radioactive particle sources: α-particles of some ev energy

Lattice design: design and optimisation of the principle elements of an accelerator... the lattice cells 95: Courant, Livingston, Snyder: Theory of strong focusing in particle beams

Lattice Design: how to build a storage ring High energy accelerators circular machines somewhere in the lattice we need a number of dipole magnets, that are bending the design orbit to a closed ring Geometry of the ring: centrifugal force = Lorentz force e * v * B = m v ρ mv e* B = = p / ρ ρ B * ρ = p / e p = momentum of the particle, ρ = curvature radius Bρ= beam rigidity Example: heavy ion storage ring TSR 8 dipole magnets of equal bending strength

Circular Orbit: defining the geometry α ds α = ρ dl ρ ds α = B* dl B* ρ field map of a storage ring dipole magnet The angle swept out in one revolution must be π, so for a full circle Bdl α = = π Bdl = π* B* ρ p q Nota bene: Δ 4 is usually required!! B B 0

Example HERA: 90 GeV Proton storage ring dipole magnets N = 46 l = 8.8m q = + e Bdl N * l * B = π p / q 9 π * 90 * 0 ev B 8 m 46 * 3* 0 * 8. 8m * s e 5. 5 Tesla

Focusing forces and particle trajectories: Equation of motion x'' + K* x = 0 K = k + / ρ K = k hor. plane vert. plane dipole magnet: ρ = quadrupole lens: k B p/ e focal length: f = k*l = g p / e Example: HERA Ring: Circumference: C 0 =6335 m Bending radius: ρ = 580 m Quadrupol Gradient: G= 0 T/m k = 33.64*0-3 /m /ρ =.97 *0-6 /m! For estimates in large accelerators the weak focusing term /ρ can in general be neglected

single particle trajectories y'' + K* y = 0 ρ y Solution for a focusing magnet y ' ys y K s K s K 0 () = 0 *cos( *) + *sin( *) y '( s) = y * K *sin( K * s) + y' *cos( K * s) 0 0 y y Or written more convenient in matrix form: = * y' y' s 0

atrices of lattice elements Hor. focusing Quadrupole agnet QF cos( K * l) sin( K * l) K = K sin( K * l) cos( K * l) Hor. defocusing Quadrupole agnet QD cosh( K * l) sinh( K * l) K = K sinh( K * l) cosh( K * l) Drift space Drift = s 0 = * * * *... lattice QF D QD D QF

Periodic Lattices In the case of periodic lattices the transfer matrix can be expressed as a function of a set of periodic parameters α,, γ cos μ+ αs sin μ βs sin μ () s = γs sin μ cos( μ) αs sin μ For stability of the motion in periodic lattice structures it is required that s+ L μ = s dt β () t µ = phase advance per period: trace( ) < In terms of these new periodic parameters the solution of the equation of motion is ys () = ε * β()*cos( s Φ() s δ) ε y'( s) = * sin( Φ( s) ) + cos( Φ( s) ) β { δ α δ }

The new parameters α,, can be transformed through the lattice via the matrix elements defined above. β C SC S β α = CC ' SC ' + S ' C SS ' * α γ C' S' C' S' γ S 0 Question: What does that mean????... and here starts the lattice design!!!

ost simple example: drift space C = C' S S' l = 0 particle coordinates x l x = * x' 0 x' l 0 x( l) = x + l* x ' x'( l) = x 0 0 0 ' transformation of twiss parameters: β l l β α = 0 l * α γ 0 0 γ l 0 β( s) = β l* α + l * γ 0 0 0 Stability...? trace ( ) = + = A periodic solution doesn t exist in a lattice built exclusively out of drift spaces.

Lattice Design: Arc: regular (periodic) magnet structure: bending magnets define the energy of the ring main focusing & tune control, chromaticity correction, multipoles for higher order corrections Straight sections: drift spaces for injection, dispersion suppressors, low beta insertions, RF cavities, etc...... and the high energy experiments if they cannot be avoided

The FoDo-Lattice A magnet structure consisting of focusing and defocusing quadrupole lenses in alternating order with nothing in between. (Nothing = elements that can be neglected on first sight: drift, bending magnets, RF structures... and especially experiments...) QF QD QF L Starting point for the calculation: in the middle of a focusing quadrupole Phase advance per cell µ = 45, calculate the twiss parameters for a periodic solution

βÿ wœ Š š œ GˆGm k jœ β Output of the optics program: Nr Type Length Strength β x α x φ x β z α z φ z m /m m /π m /π 0 IP 0,000 0,000,6 0,000 0,000 5,95 0,000 0,000 QFH 0,50-0,54,8,54 0,004 5,488-0,78 0,007 QD 3,5 0,54 5,488-0,78 0,070,8,54 0,066 3 QFH 6,00-0,54,6 0,000 0,5 5,95 0,000 0,5 4 IP 6,00 0,000,6 0,000 0,5 5,95 0,000 0,5 QX= 0,5 QZ= 0,5 0. 5* π = 45

Can we understand, what the optics code is doing? matrices QF cos( K* lq) sin( K* lq) K = Ksin( K* lq) cos( K* lq), Drift l = 0 d strength and length of the FoDo elements K = +/- 0.540 m - lq = 0.5 m ld =.5 m The matrix for the complete cell is obtained by multiplication of the element matrices = * * * * FoDo qfh ld qd ld qfh Putting the numbers in and multiplying out... FoDo = 0.707 8.06 0.06 0.707

The transfer matrix for period gives us all the information that we need!.) is the motion stable? trace( FoDo) =.45 cggy.) Phase advance per cell cosμ+ αsin μ βsin μ s () = γsin μ cos( μ) αsin μ cos( μ ) = * ( ) 0.707 trace = μ = arc cos( * trace( )) = 45 3.) hor β-function (, ) β = =.6 sin( μ) m 4.) hor α-function (,) cos( μ) α = = 0 sin( μ)

Can we do it a little bit easier? We can: the thin lens approximation atrix of a focusing quadrupole magnet: QF cos( K * l) sin( K * l) K = K sin( K * l) cos( K * l) If the focal length f is much larger than the length of the quadrupole magnet, f = >> l kl Q Q the transfer matrix can be aproximated using kl = const, l 0 q q 0 = f

m k G Œ š ˆ Ÿ ˆ k ld = L/, L f % = f Calculate the matrix for a half cell, starting in the middle of a foc. quadrupole: = * * halfcell QD / ld QF / halfcell 0 0 ld = * * 0 f f % % halfcell ld l D f = ld l D + f f % % % for the second half cell set f -f

FoDo in thin lens approximation atrix for the complete FoDo cella l D l + l D D l D % % f f = * ld l D ld l D + f f f f % % % % ld l D l ( ) D + % % f f = ld ld ld ( ) 3 f f f % % % Now we know, that the phase advance is related to the transfer matrix by 4l l cos μ = trace ( ) = *( ) = f f D D % % After some beer and with a little bit of trigonometric gymnastics x = x x = x cos( ) cos ( ) sin ( / ) sin ( )

we can calculate the phase advance as a function of the FoDo parameter cos( μ) sin ( μ/ ) = = L sin( μ / ) = ld / f = f % Cell % l f% D sin( μ / ) = L Cell 4 f Example: 45-degree Cell L Cell = l QF + l D + l QD +l D = 0.5m+.5m+0.5m+.5m = 6m /f = k*l Q = 0.5m*0.54 m - = 0.7 m - L Cell sin( μ / ) = 0.405 4 f μ 47.8 β.4m Remember: Exact calculation yields: μ = 45 β =.6m

z ˆ GˆGm k š œš œ Œ FoDo ld l D l ( ) D + f f = ld ld l D ( ) 3 f f f % % % % % Stability requires: trace( ) < SPS Lattice 4 trace( ) = l D < f % f > L cell 4 m Gš ˆ Œ Šˆ Œ Ž ˆšG G Œ ˆ ŽŒ G ˆ ˆG œˆ Œ G Œ ŠŒ Œ Ž HH

Transformation matrix in terms of the Twiss parameters Transformation of the coordinate vector (x,x ) in a lattice ρ xs () x0 = s, s ' x ( s) x 0 x General solution of the equation of motion s s xs () = ε* β()*cos(() s φ s + ϕ) { } x'( s) = ε * α( s)cos( φ( s) + ϕ) + sin( φ( s) + ϕ) β() s Transformation of the coordinate vector (x,x ) expressed as a function of the twiss parameters β (cosφ + α sin φ) ββ sinφ β = ( α α)cos φ ( + αα )sinφ β(cos φ α sin φ) ββ β

% % % { ˆ š Œ G ˆ Ÿ ˆ GˆGm k ŠŒ a halfcell ld l D f = ld l D + f f k L Compare to the twiss parameter form of β (cos φ + α sin φ) ββ sinφ β = ( α α)cos φ ( + αα )sinφ β (cos φ α sin φ) ββ β In the middle of a foc (defoc) quadrupole of the FoDo we allways have α = 0, and the half cell will lead us from β max to β min β μ cos ˆ μ ββsin C S ˆ β = = C' S' μ ˆ β μ sin cos ˆ ββ β

% % Solving for β max and β min and remembering that. μ ld L sin = = % f 4 f μ ˆ + sin S ' β + ld / f = = = C ld / f μ β sin S C ' = ˆ ββ = % f = sin l D μ ˆ β = β = μ (+ sin ) L sin μ μ ( sin ) L sin μ!! The maximum and minimum values of the β-function are solely determined by the phase advance and the length of the cell. Longer cells lead to larger β typical shape of a proton bunch in the HERA FoDo Cell ( Z, X, Y)

Beam dimension: Optimisation of the FoDo Phase advance: In both planes a gaussian particle distribution is assumed, given by the beam emittance ε and the β-function σ = εβ HERA beam size In general proton beams are round in the sense that ε x ε y So for highest aperture we have to minimise the β-function in both planes: r = ε xβ x + ε yβ y typical beam envelope, vacuum chamber and pole shape in a foc. Quadrupole lens in HERA

v š Ž Œ m k ˆšŒ ˆ ˆ ŠŒ r = ε xβ x + ε yβ y search for the phase advance µ that results in a minimum of the sum of the beta s μ μ (+ sin ) * L ( sin ) * L ˆ β + β = + sin μ sin μ ˆ β + β = L sin μ d ( L ) = 0 dμ sin μ 0 βges( μ) 0 0 8 6 4 0 0 30 60 90 0 50 80 0 μ 80 L *cos μ = 0 μ = 90 sin μ

Electrons are different electron beams are usually flat, ε y - 0 % ε x optimise only β hor μ L( + sin ) d ( ˆ d β) = = 0 μ 76 dμ dμ sin μ 30 30 4 β max( μ ) β min ( μ ) 8 red curve: β max blue curve: as a function of the phase advance µ 0 6 0 36.8 7.6 08.4 44. 80 μ 80

Orbit distortions in a periodic lattice field error of a dipole/distorted quadrupole ds Bds δ ( mrad) = = ρ p/ e the particle will follow a new closed trajectory, the distorted orbit: () s x() s = β * β() s cos( φ() s φ() s πq) ds sin πq ρ( s) % % % o % * the orbit amplitude will be large if the β function at the location of the kick is large β(š~ ) indicates the sensitivity of the beam here orbit correctors should be placed in the lattice * the orbit amplitude will be large at places where in the lattice β(s) is large here beam position monitors should be installed

Orbit Correction and Beam Instrumentation in a storage ring Elsa ring, Bonn *

Resumé:.) Dipole strength: p Bds = N * B0 * leff = π q l eff effective magnet length, N number of magnets.) Stability condition: Trace( ) < for periodic structures within the lattice / at least for the transfer matrix of the complete circular machine 3.) Transfer matrix for periodic cell () s = cos μ+ α( s)sin μ β( s)sin μ γ()sin s μ cos( μ) α()sin s μ α,β,γ depend on the position s in the ring, µ (phase advance) is independent of s 4.) Thin lens approximation: QF 0 = f Q f Q = k l Q Q focal length of the quadrupole magnet f Q = /(k Q l Q) >> l Q

5.) Tune (rough estimate): Tune = phase advance in units of π s+ L μ = s dt β () t μ ds πr Q: = N* = * o * R π π = β( s) π β β R, β average radius and β-function Q R β 6.) Phase advance per FoDo cell (thin lens approx) μ sin = L Cell 4 fq L Cell length of the complete FoDo cell, f Q focal length of the quadrupole, µ phase advance per cell 7.) Stability in a FoDo cell f > (thin lens approx) 4 Q L Cell 8.) Beta functions in a FoDo cell (thin lens approx) ˆ β = μ (+ sin ) sin μ L Cell β = μ ( sin ) sin μ L Cell L Cell length of the complete FoDo cell, µ phase advance per cell

Conclusion: * the arc of a storage ring is usually built out of a periodic sequence of single magnet elements eg. FoDo sections * a first guess of the main parameters of the beam in the arc is obtained by the settings of the quadrupole lenses in this section * we can get an estimate of the beam parameters using a selection of rules of thumb Usually the real beam properties will not differ too much from these estimates and we will have a nice storage ring and a beautifull beam and everybody is happy around.

And then someone comes and spoils it all by saying something stupid like installing a tiny little piece of detector in our machine

INSERTIONS INSERTIONS