INTRODUCTION MATERIALS & METHODS

Similar documents
INTERPRETATION OF THE GRAM STAIN

ENTEROBACTER AEROGENES UNKNOWN BACTERIA FLOW CHART UNKNOWN LAB REPORT, MICROBIOLOGY ENTEROBACTER AEROGENES

Comparison of FecalSwab and ESwab devices for storage and transportation of diarrheagenic

Microbiology. Definition of a Microorganism. Microorganisms in the Lab. The Study of Microorganisms

Originally published as:

ALKEN-MURRAY CORPORATION P. O. Box 400, New Hyde Park, NY TELEPHONE Fax

colony size color morphology haemolysis S. aureus S. epidermidis

ANTIMICROBIAL TESTING. E-Coli K-12 - E-Coli 0157:H7. Salmonella Enterica Servoar Typhimurium LT2 Enterococcus Faecalis

Considerations with Antibiotic Therapy PART

HAEMOPHILUS MODULE 29.1 INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES 29.2 MORPHOLOGY. Notes

EZ-COMP EZ-COMP For Training and Proficiency Testing Product Details

Tetracycline Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th November 2009

Figure 1. Kit for the collection of CSF.

Evaluation of the efficiency of Mxxxx as a barrier against microrganisms crossing

NUT-TTC/EMB Code 5541

System with a Conventional Broth System

AEROBIC BACTERIA GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIA. Tests S. aureus CNST S. saprophyticus Micrococcus species 6

Game plan Lecture Lab Prelabs

Laboratory Exercise # 7: Aseptic Technique

Overview of the major bacterial pathogens The major bacterial pathogens are presented in this table:

Rapid Test Methods. Bacteria Presumptive ID Additional Tests for Definitive ID

Telithromycin in vitro

Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus parainfluenzae

Fluids, Using Specific Antibody-Coated Staphylococci

Comparative Bacteriology Analysis: Source, cultivation, and preparation of bacterial samples:

Orbital Diagnostics: Rapid antibiotic sensitivity determination. Dr Robert J H Hammond

Experiences with the Coulter Counter in Bacteriology1

MICROBIOLOGY LAB #1 SAFETY RULES & GRAM STAIN METHOD

DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY COURSE OUTLINE - FALL 2014 LAB PROCEDURES AND MICROBIOLOGY AH 174 E- MAIL:

Interpretation of Gram Stains for the Nonmicrobiologist

Microbial Taxonomy. Classification of living organisms into groups. A group or level of classification

Most common dose (mg) 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1. Maximum dose schedule (mg) 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1 1g x 1

A Selective Medium for Bacillus anthracis

THE IDENTIFICATION OF TWO UNKNOWN BACTERIA AFUA WILLIAMS BIO 3302 TEST TUBE 3 PROF. N. HAQUE 5/14/18

THE JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE

ANALYSIS OF MICROBIAL COMPETITION

Development of a Lysis-Filtration Blood Culture Technique

Microchem Silliker Private Limited, A-513, Microchem House, TTC Industrial Area, Mahape, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra

Use of the 3M Molecular Detection System for Salmonella and Listeria spp.

Microbe Mission C Test

Pharmaceutical Microbiology Forum Newsletter Vol. 12 (4) Page 3 of 14 (NCIMB 8545, CIP NBRC. Salmonella enterica ssp typhimurium

_ + Discriminates aerobic organisms that produce catalase to degrade hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen

DIFFERENTIATING GRAM-NEGATIVE AND GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA

CLASSIFICATION OF BACTERIA

Labquality External Quality Assessment Programmes General Bacteriology 1 2/2014

Nitroxoline Rationale for the NAK clinical breakpoints, version th October 2013

Day 2 - Viewing a prepared slide of mixed bacteria on high power.

Lab Exercise 5: Pure culture techniques

Neisseria meningitidis and Haemophilus influenzae Survey Brief

Supporting information

Validation of EUCAST zone diameter breakpoints against reference broth microdilution

THE GRAM STAIN OBJECTIVE/RATIONALE KEY POINTS

OUTLINE INTRODUCTION TO CLSI M35-A2 INTRODUCTION TO CLSI M35-A2 BENEFITS OF RAPID RESULTS

EUCAST. Linezolid Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th November 2005

The Effect of Static Magnetic Field on E. coli, S. aureus and B. subtilis Viability

Figure Page 117 Microbiology: An Introduction, 10e (Tortora/ Funke/ Case)

Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli Iron Transport Mutants

Gram negative bacilli

Bile Chrysoidin Glycerol Agar with MUG

Practical examination

Culture Medium for Selective Isolation and Enumeration of Gram-Negative Bacteria from Ground Meatst

Supporting Information

Gentamicin Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th February, 2009

Chapter 6 Microbial Growth With a focus on Bacteria

AOAC Method Comparison Study. Deli Turkey 1 CFU/25g & 5 CFU/25g

10ml. Set (4 poly and 17 monovalent, 2ml each)

Stability. Received for publication 1 August to be fl-lactamase-producing strains.

Laboratory Report. Thus both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, yeast, dermatophytes and mould are detected.

Performance Evaluation of Various ATP Detecting Units

ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF PLANT EXTRACTS IN FOOD PRODUCTS

Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology, January 2007 Vol. 16, No. 1

Killing of Bacillus Spores by High-Intensity Ultraviolet Light

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY GRAM STAIN

Toronto General Hospital ANTIBIOGRAM Emergency Department January 1, December 31, 2016

Project Title: Estimation of the area affected by animal feces in vegetable field under overhead sprinkle irrigation system

INTRODUCTION bioactive compounds Pigmentation chromobacteria water soluble water insoluble

In vitro the effect of intestinal normal flora on some pathogenic bacteria.

LGC Standards Proficiency Testing Technical Changes January Start Schemes 2016

Growth of Salmonella typhimurium in Skim

Microbiological Evaluation of the New VITEK 2 Neisseria-Haemophilus Identification Card

μ gyra parc Escherichia coli Klebsiella pneumoniae Pseudomonas aeruginosa E. coli gyra E. coli parc gyra parc gyra Escherichia coli E. coli E.

Candy Rutherford Hamilton Regional Lab Medicine Program St Joseph s Healthcare, Hamilton

3M Food Safety Technical Bulletin

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COMPLETION DOCUMENT

Product Catalogue 2015 Clinical and Industrial Microbiology

BIOL 3702L: MICROBIOLOGY LABORATORY SCHEDULE, SUMMER 2015

MICROBIAL BIOCHEMISTRY BIOT 309. Dr. Leslye Johnson Sept. 30, 2012

Synthesis of Silver-Treated Bentonite: Evaluation of its Antibacterial Properties

ID Membranes for Microbial Rapid Identification

The effects of agar concentration on the growth and morphology of submerged colonies of motile and nonmotile

Antimicrobial Activity of Cinnamic Acid, Citric Acid, Cinnamaldehyde, and Levulinic Acid Against Foodborne Pathogens

Estimating MU for microbiological plate count using intermediate reproducibility duplicates method

Antibacterial Activities of Thymol, Eugenol and Nisin Against Some Food Spoilage Bacteria

C.M. Harris*, S.K. Williams* 1. PhD Candidate Department of Animal Sciences Meat and Poultry Processing and Food Safety

Silver Nanoparticles Microbial Assessment by Adam Yang

Photobleaching resistant polymer supported hexanuclear molybdenum. iodide cluster for photocatalytic oxygenations and photodynamic

Update on the ISBT TTID study on establishment of bacterial reference strains for RBC

The Effect of Garlic (Allium sativum) Extract in Suppressing Microbial Growth Isolated from Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media by In Vitro

Isolation of marine bacteria, antagonistic to human pathogens

Concentrated Milk. Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin data generated by this study would enable the

Transcription:

Evaluation of Three Bacterial Transport Systems, The New Copan M40 Transystem, Remel Bactiswab And Medical Wire & Equipment Transwab, for Maintenance of Aerobic Fastidious and Non-Fastidious Organisms Nabeel Rishmawi, Issa Shomali, Musa Hindiyeh - Caritas Baby Hospital, Bethlehem, Palestine ABSTRACT It is well established that aspirates of fluids and exudates from suspected infected sites are superior to samples collected on swabs. However, because of the ease of using swabs, clinical microbiology laboratories continue to receive clinical samples on swabs. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the new Copan M40 Transystem [C-M40) (Copan Innovation Inc.) to the Remel BactiSwab [R-BS] (Remel) and Medical Wire & Equipment Transwab [MW-TS] (Medical Wire & Equipment Co. Ltd.). The survival of the following isolates in the three transport systems was evaluated: S. pneumoniae (ATCC 49619), H. influenzae (ATCC 49766), N. gonorrhoeae (ATCC 49226), N. meningitidis (ATCC 13090); L. monocytogenes (ATCC 19115), S. aureus (ATCC 25923); S. pyogenes (ATCC 19615); S. agalactiae (Clinical isolate); P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), M. catarrhalis (ATCC 25239), and E. coli (ATCC 25922). The procedure outlined by NCCLS guideline M40-P was followed to evaluate the three swabs. Briefly, 0.5 MacFarland standard of each organism freshly grown at 37 C for 18-24hrs was prepared. A 1:10 dilution of each organism was made and 100µl was used to inoculate each of the swabs in triplicate. The survival of the organisms at 20-25 C was determined at 0, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h. In triplicate, 100µl samples were used to quantify viable organisms on 5% SBA or Chocolate agar. With regard to the fastidious organisms, the C-M40 out performed the other two swabs with maintaining the viability of N. gonorrhoeae, and H. influenzae. Unlike R-BS and MW-TS swabs, which maintained the viability of N. gonorrhoeae for 6 hrs, CM-40 maintained the viability of N. gonorrhoeae for up to 24 hours. Furthermore, H. influenzae survived for up to 72 hrs in CM-40 while in the R-BS and MW-TS swabs H. influenzae survived for 72 and 24hrs, respectively. The survival rate of S. pneumoniae in CM-40, R-BS and MW-TS swabs was (6, 72, 72hrs, respectively). All three swabs maintained an increasing or stable number of non-fastidious organisms with time. In conclusion, C-M40 outperformed the other two swabs evaluated by maintaining the viability of two of three fastidious organisms for at least 24 hours. This time period should be sufficient for transport of specimens to the clinical microbiology laboratory without compromising organism recovery. INTRODUCTION Diagnosis of bacterial pathogens in patients samples largely depends on sample collection and transport to the laboratory. Failure to collect an appropriate patients sample can lead to patient misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. It is well established that aspirates of fluids, and exudates from suspected infected sites are superior to samples collected on swabs (1). However, because of the ease of using swabs, clinical microbiology laboratories continue to receive clinical samples on swabs. In addition, the gold standard for collecting some clinical samples (e.g.: throat) is swabs. With the advancements in technology, swab transport systems utilizing semi-solid medium have been developed for transporting patient samples. Moreover, swabs have been shown to protect both anaerobic and fastidious aerobic organisms (2, 3, 4). In this study we compared the performance of the new Copan M40 Transystem [C-M40) (Copan Innovation Inc.) to the Remel BactiSwab [R- BS] (Remel) and Medical Wire & Equipment Transwab [MW-TS] (Medical Wire & Equipment Co. Ltd.) in maintaining the viability of fastidious and non-fastidious aerobic microorganisms. MATERIALS & METHODS Bacterial Stains: The following bacterial strains were used: Haemophilus influenzae (ATCC 49766) Neisseria gonorrhoeae (ATCC 49226) Neisseria meningitidis (ATCC 13090) Moraxella catarrhalis (ATCC 25238) Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 19115) Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 49619) Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC 19615) Streptococcus agalactiae (Clinical isolate) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) page 1 of 6

Transport Swab Systems: M40 Transystem [C-M40) (Copan Innovation Inc.) Remel BactiSwab [R-BS] (Remel) Medical Wire & Equipment Transwab [MW-TS] (Medical Wire & Equipment Co. Ltd.). Bacterial identification: The identification of all the bacterial strains used in the study was confirmed by the standard identification protocols as described by the Manual of Clinical Microbiology [5] (Murray el al. 7th edition). Agar Plates: 5% sheep blood agar plates (Cat # Hy-PD 049) and Chocolate Agar (Cat # PD-013) were purchased from Hy.Labs (Park Tamara, Rehovot, Israel). Bacterial strain cultures: All bacterial strains were cultured on the appropriate media (5% Sheep blood Agar or Chocolate Agar) for 18-24 hours at 37 C. Well isolated colonies were used for sample preparation. Some fastidious organisms required 48 hours incubation before sample preparation. Experimental Design: The NCCLS procedure M40-A was followed to evaluate the different transport swabs. Briefly, a 0.5 MacFarland (3 x 10 8 organisms/ml) standard of each organism freshly grown at 37 C for 18-24 hrs was prepared using BioMerieux Vitek Inc. colorimeter in 0.85% saline. A 1:10 dilution (3 x 10 7 organisms/ml) of each organism was made and 100µl (3 x 10 6 organisms/ml) was used to inoculate each of the swabs in triplicate. The survival of the organisms at 20-25 C was determined at 0, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h. At each of the time points, the viable organisms on the swabs were recovered in 1ml saline after vortexing of the swab for 30s, and 1:10, 1:100, and 1:1000 serial dilutions were made in sterile saline. In triplicate, 100-ul samples were used to quantify the organisms in each of the dilutions on 5% SBA or Chocolate agar. The organisms were spread over the agar surface with a plate spreader, and the plates were incubated at 37 C in 5% CO2 incubator. Data Analysis: Bacterial recovery was determined by counting the colonies recovered in each of the dilutions. The number of the organisms recovered is expressed as an average for triplicate samples evaluated and as a percentage of the baseline counts (counts at time zero). RESULTS - (Following Pages) page 2 of 6

RESULTS TABLE 1 RECOVERY OF FASTIDIOUS BACTERIA Haemophilus influenzae (ATCC 49766) C-M40 6.E+05 100 7.E+05 113 4.E+06 665 8.E+06 1217 179 R-BS 4.E+05 100 3.E+05 69 2.E+05 35 9.E+03 2 4.E+02 0 MW -TS 5.E+05 100 30 2.E+04 4 0.E+00 0 0.E+00 0 Neisseria gonorrhoeae (ATCC 49226) C-M40 6.E+04 100 20 2 3.E+01 0 0.E+00 0 R-BS 7.E+04 100 4.E+02 1 0.E+00 0 0.E+00 0 0.E+00 0 MW-TS 4.E+04 100 3.E+01 0 0.E+00 0 0.E+00 0 0.E+00 0 Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 49619) C-M40 8.E+04 100 3.E+03 3 0.E+00 0 0.E+00 0 0.E+00 0 R-BS 100 3.E+04 32 5.E+03 5 5.E+02 0 3.E+01 0 MW-TS 100 5.E+04 36 3.E+04 22 6.E+03 4 3.E+02 0 Neisseria meningitidis (ATCC13090) C-M40 6.E+04 100 5.E+04 96 6.E+04 97 205 1995 R-BS 9.E+04 100 5.E+04 56 6.E+03 7 0.E+00 0 0.E+00 0 MW-TS 100 2.E+04 20 2.E+01 0 0.E+00 0 0.E+00 0 0 1 (Log count olony C Figure 1: Recovery of Haemophilus influenzae (ATCC 49766) 0 1 (Log count olony C Figure 2: Recovery of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (ATCC 49226) Figure 3: Recovery of Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 49619) olony Count (Log 1 cfu/ml ) C 0 Figure 4: Recovery of Neisseria meningitidis (ATCC 13090) page 3 of 6

TABLE 2 RECOVERY OF GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) C-M40 2.E+05 100 2.E+05 90 4.E+06 1761 7.E+07 28719 59949 R-BS 3.E+05 100 2.E+05 95 3.E+05 106 3.E+05 119 3.E+05 116 MW-TS 5.E+05 100 6.E+05 115 4.E+05 71 2.E+05 41 27 Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC 19615) C-M40 3.E+05 100 4.E+05 124 6.E+06 1839 4.E+07 13129 6.E+07 20789 R-BS 3.E+05 100 2.E+05 51 40 7.E+04 20 3.E+04 8 MW-TS 6.E+05 100 3.E+05 54 4.E+05 68 3.E+05 50 2.E+05 33 Streptococcus agalactiae (Clinical isolate) C-M40 2.E+05 100 2.E+05 117 2.E+06 1134 9.E+07 43015 60686 R-BS 4.E+05 100 3.E+05 78 5.E+05 133 3.E+05 95 30 MW-TS 6.E+05 100 6.E+05 97 175 7.E+05 107 6.E+04 9 Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 19115) C-M40 4.E+05 100 2.E+06 448 4.E+07 12292 5.E+07 13928 8.E+07 23222 R-BS 6.E+05 100 2.E+06 333 2426 2.E+07 3028 3.E+07 4998 MW-TS 100 98 5.E+06 360 5.E+06 357 685 Figure 5: Recovery of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) (Log10 Colony Count Figure 6: Recovery of Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC 19615) C olony 1 0 (Log count Figure 7: Recovery of Streptococcus agalacticae (Clinical isolate) Figure 8: Recovery of Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 19115) page 4 of 6

TABLE 3 RECOVERY OF GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA Moraxella catarrhalis (ATCC 25239) C-M40 100 67 2.E+05 175 3.E+06 1976 2.E+07 10793 R-BS 2.E+05 100 59 8.E+04 46 2.E+06 1091 6.E+06 3340 MW-TS 2.E+05 100 61 4.E+04 22 3.E+04 15 4.E+03 2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) C-M40 100 110 3.E+07 25046 91431 3.E+08 241410 R-BS 100 111 5.E+07 48026 2.E+08 213627 3.E+08 253807 MW-TS 100 9.E+04 86 86334 3.E+08 269154 92788 Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) C-M40 2.E+05 100 3.E+06 1698 2.E+08 145907 2.E+08 119713 2.E+08 122374 R-BS 2.E+05 100 2.E+06 966 9.E+07 38890 9.E+07 39596 59218 MW-TS 3.E+05 100 5.E+05 155 4.E+07 11507 5.E+07 15815 4.E+07 10317 Figure 9: Recovery of Morexella catarrhalis (ATCC 25239) Figure 10: Recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) (Log10 Colony count Figure 11: Recovery of E. coli (ATCC 25922) page 5 of 6

DISCUSSION In this study new Copan M40 Transystem outperformed the other two swabs systems (Tables 1-3). The new Copan M40 Transystem Amies Gel transport swab is flushed with Nitrogen gas and packed in this modified atmosphere. The Copan M40 Transystem maintained the viability of the fastidious organism H. influenzae for 72 hours (Fig. 1). Indeed the number of viable H. influenzae was maintained through 72 hours. On the other hand, the Remel BactiSwab maintained the number of viable organisms for 24 hours, and drops by 1 & 3 logs was observed at at 48 and 72 hours, respectively (Fig. 1). Medical Wire & Equipment Transwab maintained the number of viable H. influenzae for 6 hours; this was followed by 0.5 log reduction at 24 hours, and no viable organisms were maintained after 24 hours (Fig. 1). Copan M40 Transystem also out performed the other two swabs in maintaining the viability of N. gonorrhoaeae (Fig. 2). Copan M40 maintained viable organisms for 48 hours; however, there was a 3 log reduction at 48 hours. The other two swabs maintained viable organisms for 6 hours; however, there was 2 and 3 log reduction in the number of viable organisms (Fig. 2). No viable organisms were maintained at 24 and 48 hours. The Copan M40 Transystem also out performed the other two swabs in maintaining the viability of N. meningitidis (Fig. 3). Copan M40 maintained constant number of viable organisms for 72 hours, while the other two swabs maintained a viable number of organisms for 24 hours (Fig. 3). There was one log reduction in the number of viable organisms in the Remel BactiSwab at 24 hours, while there was a 3 log reduction in the number of viable organisms in the Medical Wire & Equipment Transwab. Copan M40 Transystem did not perform as well in maintaining the viability of S. pneumoniae (Fig. 4). Copan M40 maintained viable organism for 6 hours with 2 log reduction in the number of viable organisms. No viable organisms were detected after 6 hours. On the other hand the two other swabs maintained viable S. pneumoniae for 72 hours (Fig. 4). About three log reduction was observed after 72 hours incubation. Upon repeat testing of the three swabs with two clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae, similar results were obtained. All three swabs performed similarly with regard to maintaining the viability of gram-positive organisms, except for the S. pyogenes (Table 2). The Copan M40 increased the number of viable organisms by 2 logs at 72 hours while there was one log reduction in the number of viable organisms in the RemelBactiSwab (Fig 6). Similar results were also obtained for the three swabs for maintaining the viability of non-fastidious gram negative organisms (Table 3), except for M. catarrhalis, where one log reduction in the number of viable organisms was observed after 72 hours in the Medical Wire & Equipment Transwab swabs (Fig 9). Other factors should be considered in the evaluation of specimen transport swabs. Ease of use, cost effectiveness, durability and specimen absorption. All three swabs were easy to use, inexpensive, and did not break when dropped. Sample absorption by the Copan M40 Transystem was much better than the other two swabs. The Medical Wire & Equipment Transwab had a problem with maintaining the semi-gel in the bottom of the tube, while the other two swabs did not have this problem. CONCLUSION Copan M40 Transystem swabs outperformed the other swabs evaluated for maintaining the viability three of the four fastidious organisms evaluated. H. influenzae N. gonorrhoeae N. meningitidis Remel Bactiswab & Medical Wire & Equipment Transwab outperformed Copan M40 Transystem in maintaining viability of S. pneumoniae All three swabs maintained the viability of non-fastidious gram-positive and gram-negative organisms up to 72 hours Flushing with nitrogen and packaging in this modified atmosphere appears to maintain the viability of the fastidious organisms We rank Copan M40 Transystem as the best swab followed by Remel Bactiswab, and lastly, the Medical Wire & Equipment Transwab REFERENCES 1. Perry, J. L. (1989) Factors influencing transfer of bacteria from collection / transport systems to culture media. Clin Lab Sci. 1989; 2 340-341. 2. Perry, J. L. (1997) Assessment of swabs transport systems for aerobic and anaerobic organisms recovery. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25, 2020-2022. 3. Hindiyeh, M., V. Acevedo, and K. C. Carroll. (2001). Comparison of three transport systems (Starplex StarSwab II, the new Copan Vi-Pak Amies agar gel collection and transport swabs, and the BBL port-a-cul) for maintenance of anaerobic and fastidious aerobic organisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 377-380. 4. Farhat, S. E., M. Thibault, and R. Devlin. (2001). Efficacy of a swab transport system in maintaining viability of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39, 2958-2960. 5. Murray, P.R., E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, R. H. Yolken. (1999). Manual of Clinical Microbiology 7th edition. page 6 of 6