arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 6 Jul 2007

Similar documents
Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

Performance of muon and tau identification at ATLAS

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS MUON TRIGGER IN RUN 2

2 ATLAS operations and data taking

PoS(CORFU2016)060. First Results on Higgs to WW at s=13 TeV with CMS detector

Particle detection 1

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 2 Nov 2010

Heavy Hadron Production and Spectroscopy at ATLAS

The ATLAS Detector - Inside Out Julia I. Hofmann

Identifying Particle Trajectories in CMS using the Long Barrel Geometry

Muon Alignment at CMS

Discovery of the W and Z 0 Bosons

Status and Performance of the ATLAS Experiment

PoS(DIS 2010)190. Diboson production at CMS

Particle Identification: Computer reconstruction of a UA1 event with an identified electron as a candidate for a W >eν event

A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINING CHARGE AND MOMENTUM OF ELECTRONS AND POSITRONS USING CALORIMETRY AND SILICON TRACKING. Qun Fan & Arie Bodek

pp physics, RWTH, WS 2003/04, T.Hebbeker

Introduction. Tau leptons. SLHC. Summary. Muons. Scott S. Snyder Brookhaven National Laboratory ILC Physics and Detector workshop Snowmass, Aug 2005

V0 cross-section measurement at LHCb. RIVET analysis module for Z boson decay to di-electron

QCD cross section measurements with the OPAL and ATLAS detectors

Experimental Particle Physics Informal Lecture & Seminar Series Lecture 1 Detectors Overview

Physics object reconstruction in the ATLAS experiment

Introduction of CMS Detector. Ijaz Ahmed National Centre for Physics, Islamabad

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Tracking properties of the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT)

Study of the Optimum Momentum Resolution in the. CMS Muon System

ATLAS jet and missing energy reconstruction, calibration and performance in LHC Run-2

4. LHC experiments Marcello Barisonzi LHC experiments August

Measurement of charged particle spectra in pp collisions at CMS

Non-collision Background Monitoring Using the Semi-Conductor Tracker of ATLAS at LHC

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

Z 0 /γ +Jet via electron decay mode at s = 7TeV in

Lecture 2 & 3. Particles going through matter. Collider Detectors. PDG chapter 27 Kleinknecht chapters: PDG chapter 28 Kleinknecht chapters:

Conference Report Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

Future prospects for the measurement of direct photons at the LHC

The rejection of background to the H γγ process using isolation criteria based on information from the electromagnetic calorimeter and tracker.

(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

Recent CMS results on heavy quarks and hadrons. Alice Bean Univ. of Kansas for the CMS Collaboration

AIM AIM. Study of Rare Interactions. Discovery of New High Mass Particles. Energy 500GeV High precision Lots of events (high luminosity) Requirements

Recent Results from 7 GeV proton proton running at CMS

Theory English (Official)

Optimizing Selection and Sensitivity Results for VV->lvqq, 6.5 pb -1, 13 TeV Data

WW Same-Sign Double Parton Scattering CMS Experiment

Compact Muon Solenoid Surapat Ek-In École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

The ATLAS muon and tau triggers

Nuclear and Particle Physics 4b Physics of the Quark Gluon Plasma

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

2 The ATLAS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN

Arnaud Ferrari. Uppsala, April Department of Physics and Astronomy Uppsala University, Sweden. Advanced Particle Physics:

LHC Detectors and their Physics Potential. Nick Ellis PH Department, CERN, Geneva

7 Physics at Hadron Colliders

Detectors & Beams. Giuliano Franchetti and Alberica Toia Goethe University Frankfurt GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Analysis of W µν+jets

Last Friday: pp(bar) Physics Intro, the TeVatron

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. Commissioning of the CMS Detector

Chapter 2 Experimental Apparatus

Study and Simulation of the Radiation background of the ATLAS Experiment at CERN using the Monte Carlo method

Discovery potential of the SM Higgs with ATLAS

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 29 Feb 2012

HEAVY ION PHYSICS WITH CMS

Measurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC. Michele Cascella

Identification and rejection of pile-up jets at high pseudorapidity with the ATLAS detector

Higgs cross-sections

A glance at LHC Detector Systems. Burkhard Schmidt, CERN PH-DT

A Study of the Higgs Boson Production in the Dimuon Channelat 14 TeV

Boosted top quarks in the ttbar dilepton channel: optimization of the lepton selection

Tracking at the LHC. Pippa Wells, CERN

Drell Yan process at Large Hadron Collider

The ATLAS Detector at the LHC

Higgs Boson in Lepton Decay Modes at the CMS Experiment

Risultati dell esperimento ATLAS dopo il run 1 di LHC. C. Gemme (INFN Genova), F. Parodi (INFN/University Genova) Genova, 28 Maggio 2013

Tutorial on Top-Quark Physics

Experimental Methods of Particle Physics

The first Z boson measurement in the dimuon channel in PbPb collisions at s = 2.76 TeV at CMS

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 25. Particle Detectors

Measurement of the Higgs Couplings by Means of an Exclusive Analysis of its Diphoton decay

Measurement of the Inclusive Isolated Prompt Photon Cross Section at CDF

Concepts of Event Reconstruction

HERA e-p scattering events observed in the H1Detector. H1 Events Joachim Meyer DESY

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 20 Jan 2013

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Particle Detectors : an introduction. Erik Adli/Are Strandlie, University of Oslo, August 2017, v2.3

Transverse momentum and pseudorapidity distributions with minimum bias events in CMS at the LHC

Electroweak Physics at the Tevatron

What detectors measure

Hadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18

Last Lecture 1) Silicon tracking detectors 2) Reconstructing track momenta

Charged Particle Multiplicity in pp Collisions at s = 13 TeV

Top Physics at CMS. Intae Yu. Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Korea Yonsei University, Sep 12 th, 2013

ATLAS EXPERIMENT : HOW THE DATA FLOWS. (Trigger, Computing, and Data Analysis)

Excited Electron Search in the e eeγ Channel in ATLAS at S = 7 TeV

The LHC The Large Hadron Collider and ATLAS

Brief Report from the Tevatron. 1 Introduction. Manfred Paulini Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, California 94720

Hadronic vs e + e - colliders

ATLAS Calorimetry (Geant)

CMS Conference Report

Top quarks objects definition and performance at ATLAS

Transcription:

Muon Identification at ALAS and Oliver Kortner Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Föhringer Ring, D-005 München, Germany arxiv:0707.0905v1 [hep-ex] Jul 007 Abstract. Muonic final states will provide clean signatures for many physics processes at the LHC. he two LHC experiments ALAS and will be able to identify muons with a high reconstruction efficiency above 9% and a high transverse momentum resolution better than % for transverse momenta below 400 GeV/c and about % at 1 ev/c. he two experiments follow complentary concepts of muon detection. ALAS has an instrumented air-toroid mangetic system serving as a stand-alone muon spectrometer. relies on high bending power and momentum resolution in the inner detector, and uses an iron yoke to increase its magnetic field. he iron yoke is instrumented with chambers used for muon identification. herefore, muon momenta can only be reconstructed with high precision by combining inner-detector information with the data from the muon chambers. Keywords: ALAS,, LHC, muon, muon identification PACS: 9.30.-h, 9.30.Aj, 9.40.Gx INRODUCION he large hadron collider (LHC) will be the next hadron collider which will go into operation. From the year 00 on, it will collide protons at a centre-of-mass energy of ev with a luminosity between 33 cm s 1 and 34 cm s 1 [? ]. Many physics processes which are currently out of reach at the existing colliders will become accessible by the LHC. hese processes range from the production of the Higgs and new gauge bosons to the production of superpartners of the known fundamental particles. All of them, however, are highly obscured by QCD reactions. he QCD reactions are usually accompanied by multiple jets in the final state and leptons of low transverse momenta. herefore many of the interesting non-qcd processes can be detected in final states with leptons of high transverse momenta. Since muons lose very little energy on their passage through matter and are therefore the only highly energetic charged particles traversing the entire detector, muonic final states provide the cleanest signatures for the detection of new physics processes. 1500 00 H(130 GeV) ZZ 4 Z + A(300 GeV) + 500 PSfrag replacements Z ( ev) + 0 1 3 p (GeV/c) FIGURE 1. ransverse momentum distribution for muons from H, Z, A, and Z decays as predicted by Pythia [? ]. Figure 1 shows the transverse-momentum distributions of muons from the decays of Z bosons, standard-model Higgs bosons H with a mass of 130 GeV/c, supersymmetric Higgs bosons A with a mass of 300 GeV/c, and Z

bosons with a mass of ev/c. As the masses of the resonances cover a range from 90 GeV/c to ev/c, the decay muons have transverse momenta from a few GeV/c to 1 ev/c. As a consequence, the detectors at the LHC must be able to detect and identify muons over this large transverse momentum range. (barn/gev) dσ/dp 1 1 c b t W Z/γ* π/k Shower muons 0 1 3 4 5 η <.7 1 3 4 34 dn /dp (khz/gev) at L= /(cm²s) 0 0 30 40 50 p (GeV/c) FIGURE. ransverse momentum dependence of inclusive muon cross sections for the ALAS experiment at the LHC [? ]. Yet the main source of muons are mesons as can be concluded from the inclusive muon cross sections in Figure. he cross sections presented there depend on the hermicity and density of the calorimeters of the detector; the detectors under discussion in this article have similar cross sections. Most of the muons with transverse momenta p < GeV/c are from the decays of charged pions and kaons in the final state of the initial proton-proton collision. At p GeV/c, decays of b and c mesons become the dominant source of muons. he inclusive cross sections for muons from W and Z decays are only comparable to the inclusive cross sections for muons from b and c meson decays in the region around 50 GeV/c. Muons from t quark decays are much rarer than from b and c decays. Charged pions are not only produced in the primary proton-proton collision but also during the absorption of the final state hadrons in the calorimeters. he pions in hadron showers, however, have lower transverse momenta than the primarily produced pions. Hence the shower muons, i.e. the muons from the decays of pions in hadron showers, are very soft so that most of them cannot escape the calorimeter and remain undetected. At the LHC, shower muons are insignificant as compared to muons from the decay of pions and kaons before their interaction in the detectors. Although the muons of all the different sources can be detected as muons by the particle detectors at the LHC, it has become common practice in muon identification to identify only those muons as muons which do not emerge from pion and kaon days or hadron showers. wo omnipurpose experiments will be operated at the LHC: ALAS (a toroidal LHC apparatus) and (the compact muon solenoid). Both experiments have a high muon detection and identification capability as will be explained in the present article. 5 HE ALAS AND MUON SYSEMS In the ALAS and detectors, muons are identified as those charged particles which leave a trace in the inner tracker which matches a charged track in tracking chambers mounted outside the calorimeters. Muons lose about 3 GeV of their energy on average during their passage through the calorimeters. he energy loss of muons is dominated by ionization up to muon energies of 0 GeV. As the energy lost in a single ionization is small, the overall energy loss has a small spread about its mean value. Above 0 GeV, direct e + e pair production, bremsstrahlung, and nuclear losses contribute significantly to the energy loss of muons [? ]. he latter two processes may relatively often lead to a single "catastrophic" energy loss comparable to the total muon energy. his causes a low-energy tail in the measured muon energy. Its spectrum still exhibits a peak with a σ of about 0% for E = 1 ev. he measured muon energies

in the tail of the distribution can be recovered by means of the energy detected along the muon trajectory in the calorimeter. he energy of a muon at the exit of the calorimeters is therefore equal to the energy of the muon plus its well calculable energy loss in the calorimeters with a relative accuracy of about 1% for muon energies above GeV. FIGURE 3. Sketch of the ALAS detector on the left and the detector on the right. Both ALAS and have the capability of measuring the energies of the muons in the muon systems. hey differ, however, in accuracy as the designs of the detectors follow different strategies. Sketches of the ALAS and detectors are shown in Figure 3. Both detectors have the typical structure of collider detectors: an inner tracking detector in a solenoidal magnetic field surrounded by electromagnetic and hadron calorimeters which are themselves enclosed in a muons system. he muon system of ALAS [? ] is designed to be able to measure muon momenta with high accuracy independently of the inner detector. It uses a system of eight superconducting air-core toroid coils, which produces a toroidal magnetic field of 0.4 on average in the muon system. he air-core structure was used to minimize the amount of material the muons have to traverse in the muon spectrometer, hence to minimize multiple scattering of muons in the muon spectrometer. he deflections of the muons in the barrel part of the spectrometer are measured by three layers of tracking chambers with.5 m interspace. he inner and outer layers are attached to the toroid coils, the middle layer is mounted in the middle of the coils. he endcap part of the muon chambers consists of three disks of tracking chambers at m interspace with the two inner disks enclosing the endcap toroid system (see Figure 3). he sagittae of curved 0.5 m muon trajectories in the spectrometer are of the order of p [GeV/c], thus 0.5 mm for p = 1 ev/c. In order to measure the sagitta of 0.5 mm for 1 ev muons with an accuracy of %, ALAS uses monitored drift-tube chambers which have a spatial resolution better than 0.040 mm. An optical alignment system is used to monitor the geometry of the muon spectrometer with 30 m accuracy. Since the monitored drift-tube chambers have a maximum response time of 700 ns and are therefore slow compared to the 5 ns bunch-crossing frequency of the LHC, resistive-plate chambers in the barrel part and thin-gap chambers in the endcap part of the muon spectrometer are used for triggering. he trigger chambers have a response time below ns and are therefore capable of assigning the measured muons to the correct bunch crossing. he muon spectrometer is capable of detecting muons up to pseudorapidities of.7. In the design of the detector great emphasis is given on a very high momentum resolution of the inner detector. he momentum resolution is inversely proportional to the bending power inside the inner detector. A magnetic field strength of 4 in the inner detector is achieved by amplifying the magnetic field with a large iron yoke embedding the superconducting solenoid coil. For comparison: as ALAS abstains from an iron yoke, the magnetic field in the inner detector of ALAS is only. he return yoke of the solenoid is instrumented with four layers of muon chambers. As the momentum resolution of the muon system is dominated by multiple scattering of the muons in the iron yoke, tracking chambers with a lower spatial resolution ( 70 m) than in ALAS can be used. Drift-tube chambers with 400 ns response time are used in the barrel part of the muon system, cathode strip chambers with 50 ns response time in the endcaps. Like in ALAS, fast trigger chambers are needed to identify the detected muons with the right bunch crossing of the LHC. Resistive-plate chambers are used throughout the whole muon system for triggering. he muon system has a pseudorapidity coverage of.4. he muon momentum resolutions which can be achieved in stand-alone mode of the ALAS and barrel muon systems are shown in Figure 4. he ALAS muon spectrometer has a high transverse momentum resolution between and 4% for transverse muon momenta p 300 GeV/c. he p resolution reaches % for p = 1 ev/c. Energy loss fluctuations only influence the momentum resolution at very low p. he resolution has a lower limit of %

contribution to resolution (%) 1 1 4 0 otal Chamber resolution Chamber alignment Multiple scattering in the spectrometer Energy loss fluctuations Multiple scattering in the muon system 4 Chamber resolution 3 0 3 contribution to resolution (%) 1 1 otal FIGURE 4. Momentum resolution of the barrel muon system in stand-alone mode. Left: ALAS [? ]. Right: [? ] (the contributions to the resolution are estimates by the author of this article). caused by multiple scattering in the muon spectrometer. For p > 300 GeV/c the curvatures of the muon trajectories in the muon spectrometer are so small that the intrinsic spatial resolution of the chambers and the limited accuracy of the chamber alignment dominate the momentum resolution of the spectrometer. In the muon system, the transverse momentum resolution is limited by the chambers resolution for high values of p, but multiple scattering of the muons in the iron yoke is the dominant contribution to its transverse momentum resolution up to p =400 GeV/c. he transverse momentum resolution is proportional to the amount of multiple scattering and inversely proportional to the bending power of the magnetic field in the muon system. he amount of multiple scattering is about times larger in than in ALAS, but the bending power of the magnetic field is 5 times larger in than in ALAS such that, overall, the stand-alone transverse momentum resolution is only 3 times worse than in ALAS. resolution (%) 0 0 1 1 1 stand alone combined ALAS ALAS resolution (%) 4 4 0 0 0 00 1 stand alone combined ALAS 0 00 FIGURE 5. Momentum resolution of the ALAS and detector after combining the momentum measurements of the inner detectors and the muon systems [? ][? ]. Left: Momentum resolution for muons in the barrel region. Right: Momentum resolution for muons in the endcap region.

he situation improves significantly after the combination of the momentum measured by the muon system with the momentum measured by the inner detector (see Figure 5). achieves an overall p resolution between 0.5 and % for p 300 GeV/c due to the high bending power and the high resolution of the inner detector system. he bending power in the ALAS inner detector is about half as big as in and the combined muon momentum resolution is about twice poorer than in. he bending power of the magnet is much smaller in the endcaps than in the barrel part of the muon system which makes the stand-alone muon momentum resolution worse. he measurement of the momentum of muon flying into an endcap is totally determined by the inner detector. ALAS profits from its high stand-alone performance and achieves a better combined momentum resolution than for high p muons in the endcaps. MUON RACK-RECONSRUCION AND IDENIFICAION All high momentum tracks which are recorded by the muon system of ALAS and are muon tracks. Both experiments follow the same track reconstruction strategy. Figure illustrates the track reconstruction steps in case of a muon with p > GeV/C in the barrel part of the ALAS muon spectrometer. As the trigger chambers have a much lower granularity and simpler geometry than the precision chambers, their hits can easily be used to define a so-called "region of activity" through which the muon must have passed. In the second step of the track reconstruction, straight segments are reconstructed in the precision chambers within the region of activity. he local straight segments of the region of activity are then combined to a curved candidate trajectory which is finally refined by a global refit of the hits lying on the candidate trajectory. he combination of the trajectory found in the muon system with a matching trajectory in the inner detector serves two goals: (1) the improvement of the momentum resolution, especially in case of where the stand-alone muon momentum resolution is poor compared to the momentum resolution of the inner detector; () the rejection of muons from pion and kaon decays. he mother pions and kaons of the muons have decays lengths of a few metres. hus most of them leave a long trace in the inner detector before they decay. Since considerable parts of the energies of the mother pions or kaons are carried away by neutrinos, the energies of the decay muons is significantly lower than the energies of their mothers and the momentum of the inner-detector track is in mismatch with the muon-system track. herefore muons from pion or kaon decays can be rejected by requiring a good match of the corresponding inner-detector and muon-spectrometer trajectories. FIGURE. rack reconstruction in the barrel of the ALAS muon spectrometer. he procedure described above cannot be applied to muons of p < GeV/c because their trajectories do not extend to the outermost layers of the muons systems. In case of, they are absorbed by the iron yoke before; in case of ALAS, the magnetic field in the spectrometer is strong enough to bend them away from them. So the reconstruction starts with a low-momentum inner-detector track in the same solid angle as segments found in the muon system, extrapolates it to the muon system, and the segments lying on the extrapolation are selected. he number of these segments, their length and position must be compatible with the momentum of the inner-detector track. his requirement rejects muons from pion and kaon decays. Pions and kaon decaying in the calorimeters deposit much more energy in the calorimeters than muons which are minimum ionizing particles. One therefore also requires that

the energy deposited along the extrapolated inner detector trajectory in the calorimeters is compatible with the muon hypothesis. Monte-Carlo studies [? ][? ] show that an efficiency > 0% and a fake rate < 0.5% can be achieved for muons of p > 5 GeV/c in both experiments. Figure 7 summarizes the muon identification efficiency of ALAS and. he two experiments achieve the same track-reconstruction efficiency, namely about 90% for 5< p < 0 GeV/c and > 9% for p > 0 GeV/c at a fake rate<0.5%. muon efficiency (%) 0 0 0 40 0 ALAS 0 0 5 15 0 5 30 35 40 p (GeV/c) FIGURE 7. Muon identification efficiency of ALAS[? ] and [? ]. his result is particularly difficult to achieve in case of ALAS. Simulations [? ] show that, different from, a sizeable amount of low-energy neutrons leaks out of the calorimeters into the muon spectrometer. hese neutrons excite nuclei in the entire experimental hall of ALAS such that the muon spectrometer is operated in a huge neutron and γ background. his background leads to occupancies of up to 0% in the precision chambers, but less than 0.3% in the trigger chambers due to their much shorter response time. he low occupancy of the trigger chambers is responsible for a reliable determination of the regions of activity in the track reconstruction in the muon spectrometer. est-beam studies [? ][? ] and Monte-Carlo simulations [? ] show that efficient track reconstruction in the precision chambers is possible under these circumstances. SUMMARY Leptonic and especially muonic final states are best suited for physics discoveries at the LHC. he two omnipurpose experiments ALAS and which will be operated at the LHC are capable of detecting and identifying muons with an efficiency > 90% and a fake rate < 0.5% over a wide muon momentum interval of 5< p < 1 ev/c. Both experiments achieve a p resolution<% over the whole momentum range. ACKNOWLEDGMENS he author would like to express his thanks to Eric Lancone, Stefane Willoc, and Kerstin Müller for providing him information about the muon reconstruction and identification strategies in ALAS and.