Section 5 Dynamics and Control of DC-DC Converters

Similar documents
ECE1750, Spring Week 11 Power Electronics

Part II Converter Dynamics and Control

Chapter 9: Controller design

Lecture 47 Switch Mode Converter Transfer Functions: Tvd(s) and Tvg(s) A. Guesstimating Roots of Complex Polynomials( this section is optional)

Chapter 11 AC and DC Equivalent Circuit Modeling of the Discontinuous Conduction Mode

The output voltage is given by,

ANALYSIS OF SMALL-SIGNAL MODEL OF A PWM DC-DC BUCK-BOOST CONVERTER IN CCM.

Regulated DC-DC Converter

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

Chapter 8: Converter Transfer Functions

Converter System Modeling via MATLAB/Simulink

Chapter 7 DC-DC Switch-Mode Converters

Feedback design for the Buck Converter

First Order RC and RL Transient Circuits

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

Chapter 3. Steady-State Equivalent Circuit Modeling, Losses, and Efficiency

7.3 State Space Averaging!

LECTURE 44 Averaged Switch Models II and Canonical Circuit Models

Lecture 50 Changing Closed Loop Dynamic Response with Feedback and Compensation

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

DESIGN MICROELECTRONICS ELCT 703 (W17) LECTURE 3: OP-AMP CMOS CIRCUIT. Dr. Eman Azab Assistant Professor Office: C

Estimation of Circuit Component Values in Buck Converter using Efficiency Curve

Lecture 46 Bode Plots of Transfer Functions:II A. Low Q Approximation for Two Poles w o

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review

LECTURE 8 Fundamental Models of Pulse-Width Modulated DC-DC Converters: f(d)

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

Section 1: Introduction

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques

34 Control Methods for Switching Power Converters

B. T(s) Modification Design Example 1. DC Conditions 2. Open Loop AC Conditions 3. Closed Loop Conditions

LAPLACE TRANSFORMATION AND APPLICATIONS. Laplace transformation It s a transformation method used for solving differential equation.

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Department of Electrical Engineering ANALYSIS OF DC-TO-DC CONVERTERS

Figure Circuit for Question 1. Figure Circuit for Question 2

0 t < 0 1 t 1. u(t) =

Some of the different forms of a signal, obtained by transformations, are shown in the figure. jwt e z. jwt z e

6.3. Transformer isolation

Power System Operations and Control Prof. S.N. Singh Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Module 3 Lecture 8

ET4119 Electronic Power Conversion 2011/2012 Solutions 27 January 2012

Switching Flow Graph Model

Homework Assignment 09

Electronic Circuits Summary

Lecture 17 Push-Pull and Bridge DC-DC converters Push-Pull Converter (Buck Derived) Centre-tapped primary and secondary windings

Fast-Slow Scale Bifurcation in Higher Order Open Loop Current-Mode Controlled DC-DC Converters

CMOS Comparators. Kyungpook National University. Integrated Systems Lab, Kyungpook National University. Comparators

Chapter 3 AUTOMATIC VOLTAGE CONTROL

ECE Spring 2015 Final Exam

Source-Free RC Circuit

ECE Networks & Systems

Homework Assignment 08

ECE2262 Electric Circuit

Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

The role of power electronics in electrical power utilization

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

Basic Electronics. Introductory Lecture Course for. Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics Chicago, Illinois June 9-14, 2011

ECE Branch GATE Paper The order of the differential equation + + = is (A) 1 (B) 2

Unit 8: Part 2: PD, PID, and Feedback Compensation

Lecture 12 - Non-isolated DC-DC Buck Converter

Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley

Lecture 120 Compensation of Op Amps-I (1/30/02) Page ECE Analog Integrated Circuit Design - II P.E. Allen

Homework Assignment 11

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIER APPLICATIONS

Studio 9 Review Operational Amplifier Stability Compensation Miller Effect Phase Margin Unity Gain Frequency Slew Rate Limiting Reading: Text sec 5.

Modeling Buck Converter by Using Fourier Analysis

(Refer Slide Time: 00:01:30 min)

EE348L Lecture 1. EE348L Lecture 1. Complex Numbers, KCL, KVL, Impedance,Steady State Sinusoidal Analysis. Motivation

L4970A 10A SWITCHING REGULATOR

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences

Lecture 17 Date:

Impedance Interactions: An

Switched Mode Power Conversion Prof. L. Umanand Department of Electronics Systems Engineering Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

Generalized Analysis for ZCS

Cross Regulation Mechanisms in Multiple-Output Forward and Flyback Converters

SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015

Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems

NADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

LECTURE 12 Lossy Converters (Static State Losses but Neglecting Switching Losses) HW #2 Erickson Chapter 3 Problems 6 & 7 A.

ECE Spring 2017 Final Exam

Modeling, Analysis and Control of an Isolated Boost Converter for System Level Studies

Georgia Institute of Technology School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Midterm-1 Exam (Solution)

Control Systems. EC / EE / IN. For

MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions

Review of Linear Time-Invariant Network Analysis

R a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies.

First-order transient

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions

Intro. Computer Control Systems: F9

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

I R TECHNICAL RESEARCH REPORT. Sampled-Data Modeling and Analysis of PWM DC-DC Converters Under Hysteretic Control. by C.-C. Fang, E.H.

Design and Control of a Buck Boost Charger-Discharger for DC-Bus Regulation in Microgrids

EECE251. Circuit Analysis I. Set 4: Capacitors, Inductors, and First-Order Linear Circuits

Q. 1 Q. 5 carry one mark each.

vtusolution.in Initial conditions Necessity and advantages: Initial conditions assist

Maria Carmela Di Piazza. Gianpaolo Vitale. Photovoltaic Sources. Modeling and Emulation. ^ Springer

EE Branch GATE Paper 2010

AC Circuits. The Capacitor

8 sin 3 V. For the circuit given, determine the voltage v for all time t. Assume that no energy is stored in the circuit before t = 0.

Research on Control Method of Brushless DC Motor Based on Continuous Three-Phase Current

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design

Transcription:

Section 5 Dynamics and ontrol of D-D onverters 5.2. Recap on State-Space Theory x Ax Bu () (2) yxdu u v d ; y v x2 sx () s Ax() s Bu() s ignoring x (0) (3) ( si A) X( s) Bu( s) (4) X s si A BU s () ( ) () (5) Y() s X() s DU() s (6) Y() s ( si A) BU() s (7) Gs () si ( A) B : transfer function matrix (8) For stability: roots of ( si ) A must be in the LHS plane. Y s si A BU s () ( ) () (9) y(t) can be found from inverse Laplace transformation of (9). Y(s) can be modified using compensators in such a way that the transient response of y(t) is faster than normally achieved, with small over or undershoots, and Dynamics and ontrol F. Rahman of D D onverters

with adequate stability for the expected variations of system parameters, and d(t). i L v Note that y could be which are the feedback signals, 0, and these are continuously regulated. Small Signal Analysis of the Buck onverter We consider that D varies with time as an arbitrary signal. With continuous conduction, voi() t D() t Vd where v is oi regarded as an averaged D voltage. Thus v () s V D() s oi d R sl V 0 VDs () d v oi R s R Figure 5. voi () s v oi is a PWM waveform Total impedance Dynamics and ontrol 2 F. Rahman f

Z() s RL slrc // R s (0) I L () s VDs d () Z() s () I 0 () s IL() s R RR s s (2) V () s I () s R 0 0 (3) V0 () s sr Vd Ds () 2 R RL L s s R L L (4) A more appropriate modeling method that is easily applicable to all converter circuits is the State-Space Averaged modeling approach which is described below. Dynamics and ontrol 3 F. Rahman of D D onverters

The State-Space Averaged Model Any linear time invariant system can be represented by a state-space model like x Ax Bu (5) y x Du x, ignoring feed forward. (6) For single output v x 0 (7) Power electronic circuits during T ON and T states can be OFF described by two sets of differential equations. Thus, when T is ON x Ax Bu (8) v0 x (9) When T is OFF x A xb u (20) 2 2 v0 2x (2) Dynamics and ontrol 4 F. Rahman of D D onverters

T is ON for dt and OFF for ( s dt ) s. The lower case d represents continuously variable D(t). Averaging x over the interval T using s where Thus T s s 0 ( ) ( ) 2 2 of allstate var iables dt and x T gives x Ad A d x Bd B d u (22) v d ( d) x 0 2 (23) A Ad A ( d ) 2 (24) B Bd B ( d ) 2 (25) d ( d ) 2 (26) x Ax Bu v o x (26a) Dynamics and ontrol 5 F. Rahman of D D onverters

We assume that the states x vary, or have perturbations, around a steady-state X. So that x X x (27) v V v o o o ~ d D d (28) u U u (29) Note that V d (= U ) may also have perturbations. However, we assume that V d remains constant, and our task here is to find how v o varies with variations in d. During steady-state, perturbations have died down, so that 0 AX BU (30) X A BU (3) V0 A BU (32) A, B and matrices are weighted average of A & A 2, B & B 2 and & 2 respectively. Now x X x 0 x x (33) Dynamics and ontrol 6 F. Rahman of D D onverters

Thus ~ ~ x A D d A 2 ( D d) X x ~ ~ B D d B 2 ( D d) U u (34) Neglecting products of small perturbations, and assuming V to remain constant, d x AD A D X x BD B D U 2 2 A A2 X B B2 U d ~ Note that n the steady-state, AX BU 0, (34a) x Ax A A X B B Ud 2 2 ~ (35) Similarly, ~ Vo vo D2 D X x 2X d ~ ~ ~ o v x Xd 2 (36) Also, Vo X (36a) Dynamics and ontrol 7 F. Rahman of D D onverters

From 34a and 36a V V 0 d A B, where U Vd (37) From 35 x Ax ( A A2) X ( B B2) U d x Ax ( A A2) X ( B B2) V d d ~ ~ xs () SI A A A2XB B2V d d s (38) Taking Laplace transform of 36 and replacing x s from (38), the following is obtained. A A2 X B B2 V d v 0() s SI A d () s (39) X Bu 2 Dynamics and ontrol 8 F. Rahman of D D onverters

Examples. Average state equations and v () 0 s ds () of a Buck converter v s ds () 2. Average state equations and 0() converter of a Forward v s ds () 3. Average state equations and 0() converter v s ds () 4. Average state equations and 0() converter of a Boost of a Buck-Boost State-Space Averaged Representation of the Buck onverter (or Forward onverter with N N2) L i L RL i dv dt c V d N N 2 T R R v Assume ideal switch and diodes Dynamics and ontrol 9 F. Rahman f

Let il x ; vc x2 During T on for loop : di dvc Vd L RLiR( il ) dt dt Vd Lx RL R( x x 2) () Also, for loop 2 v R i ( i i ) R L dv dv v R ir R dt dt or, (2) dv From (2), ( RR) v ir dt ( R R ) x x Rx (2.) 2 2 From () and (2.) RR RR L RR L R x LR ( R) LR ( R) x L V x 2 R x 2 0 R ( R) R ( R) d Dynamics and ontrol 0 F. Rahman of D D onverters

A Therefore: RR RR L RR L R LR ( R) LR ( R) R R ( R) R ( R) B L 0 We have y v0 R( il i) R( x x 2) RR R yv x x 0 2 RR R R y v RR R x 0 R R R R x 2 RR R RR RR During t off, ie during ( DT ) s, the circuit remains the same, except that D 2 conducting makes the input voltage to the secondary equal to zero. Thus A A B 2 2 0 2 Dynamics and ontrol F. Rahman of D D onverters

Now, A Ad A ( d) 2 A A and B Bd B ( d) 2 B Bd and, d ( d) 2 d ( d) In general, R R R and RR L 0. So that: R RL L L A R B L d 0 R Dynamics and ontrol 2 F. Rahman of D D onverters

For the 2x2 matrix a A a a 2 a 2 22 using the following formula:, the inverse can be found a22 a 2 a22 a 2 A det( A) a a a a a a a a 2 22 2 2 2 R RL L L A R A R L R RL R RL RL L L A R L R RL R RL RL L L A RL R L RR RL R RL L Dynamics and ontrol 3 F. Rahman of D D onverters

A L R RL R L RR RL RR R L RR RL R RL RL R( R RL) L RR RL RR R L For the steady-state, from (37), we have V V 0 d V V 0 d A B L R RR RL RR R L d A BR L RL R( R RL) 0 R R RL R R R L V 0 RL RL R R R( R RL) d A B ; L Vd RR RL RR RL 0 V0 R L RL d V RR R L d L V0 R R d V RR R d L D From (39) v0() s ds () si A A A2 X B B2 V d 2 X Bu Dynamics and ontrol 4 F. Rahman of D D onverters

with I 0 0 ; R RL L L A R ; R ; A A2 0 Similarly ; 2 0 v0() s sr ds () 2 ( R RL) L s s R R L The denominator in the side brackets is of the form s 2 s. 2 2 0 0 Therefore, the transfer function Tp() s of the power stage and the output can be written as v () s s Tp() s V ds () s 2 s 2 0 0 d z z 2 2 0 0 where 0 L and ( R RL) R L 20 z. R Dynamics and ontrol 5 F. Rahman of D D onverters

20log0 db Vd d 0 z 40 4 0 5 0 6 0 0 o 90 o 80 o Figure 3: Bode Plot of a Buck converter Dynamics and ontrol 6 F. Rahman of D D onverters

State-Space Averaged Model of the Buck-Boost onverter T RON D V d L i L i R V 0 R L R Figure 5.4 During T ON, ie for 0 t DTs, D is Open di dt L L ilrl ilron Vd or, di R R V i dt L L L L ON d L R R V L L L ON d or x x () Also dv dt R v R dv dt dv R R v dt Dynamics and ontrol 7 F. Rahman f

dv v dt R R x2 x2 R R (2) dv R R yv R v x 0 2 dt R R R R R A B L 0 L R L 0 ON ; u Vd 0 R R R 0 R R ; During T off, ie DTS t TS, D is ON di dt dv dt L L RLiLVDR v or dil RL R dv v VD il (3) dt L L dt L L Dynamics and ontrol 8 F. Rahman of D D onverters

Also, dv dt R v R dv dt dv ( RR) v dt dv v dt R R (4) From (3) R x R x v v V L D L L R R L L R L VD x x v L L R R L R L VD x x x2 L L R R L (3.) dv R y v0 R v dt R R R y v x 0 2 R R Dynamics and ontrol 9 F. Rahman of D D onverters

A B 2 2 RL R L R R L 0 R R V d L ; 0 ; 2 0 R R R Using (36), v 0 can be written. Laplace transform of v 0 will give v () 0 s ds () Boost type converters generally produce a transfer characteristic of the form: s/ s/ v0() s Vd f( D) d() s as bs c z z2 2 There is a zero, 2 z, in the right-half s plane. The location of the zero, ie, its value depends on R and L. The quantity L is related to L and D by a non-linear equation. The RH plane zero has stability implication for high gains in the compensators. Dynamics and ontrol 20 F. Rahman of D D onverters

Figure 5.5 Figure 5.6 Dynamics and ontrol 2 F. Rahman of D D onverters

Dynamics of converter circuits. Figure 5.7 0 onverter small-signal gain = G c V D Dynamics and ontrol 22 F. Rahman of D D onverters

Model of a PWM Figure 5.8: Representation of the PWM ec e D V 2 Ts V tri, peak s tri, peak c Dynamics and ontrol 23 F. Rahman of D D onverters

Figure 5.9 Typical design of a forward converter using a lag-lead controller The controller G () s c K( s/ c ) ( s/ )( s/ ) c2 F Typically, it is desirable that 45 o m to o 60. Dynamics and ontrol 24 F. Rahman of D D onverters

c c 4 and 2 4 c c c is the bandwidth of the voltage controlled system. Normally, the existing system gain (PWM and converter) is not enough to guarantee the level of dynamic performance required of a power supply. The performance figure is roughly given by the 0 db crossover frequency oi in figure 5.6 for the buck converter. Additional gain is normally required to increase the 0 db cross-over frequency. This is supplied by the error amplifier of figure 5.5. Lag-lead, proportional + integral or other controllers may be used for the error amplifier. Figure 5.9 indicates the design of a lag-lead compensator for the outer voltage control loop. The Bode diagram of the uncompensated system is indicated by the dotted blue lines in Figure 5.9. c and c2 are the break-points of the zero and pole of this amplifier and F is the cut-off frequency of a filter (pole) which is normally located at a frequency which is lower than the switching frequency by a factor of 0 in order to filter out the switching frequency ripples. The 0 db cross-over frequency and the phase margin of the uncompensated system are not adequate. The 0 db crossover frequency c and the phase margin m2 of the compensated system are satisfactory. Note that in figure Dynamics and ontrol 25 F. Rahman of D D onverters

5.9, the error amplifier provides exactly the deficit in gain of the existing system at the desired cut-off frequency c. PWM with feed-forward The voltage controlled system (with output voltage feedback only) does not respond well (i.e., quick enough) to changes of V d in controlling V 0. Note that change in V0 must occur first before D can be changed by the error amplifier and the pulse-width modulator to remove the error in V 0 or to keep it at its reference value. PWM with feed-forward is often used to speed up the response to changes in V d. Figure 5.0 Dynamics and ontrol 26 F. Rahman of D D onverters

With the feed-forward scheme of figure 5.0, an increase (or decrease) in V d increases (or decreases) the peak value of the saw-tooth carrier. This in turn reduces (or increases) the duty cycle D appropriately, without waiting for V0 to change and show up in the feedback signal for V 0 at the input of the error amplifier. The delays in the feedback, controller and converter circuits are thus avoided. ontrol using inner current loop (urrent Mode control) ontrol of the output voltage using a single voltage loop does not fully protect the devices from over-current at start, when a large capacitor charging current may flow, when the load changes very fast or when the load is too high or short circuited. A better way is to control the current through the device(s), or the buck or boost inductor L, through a feedback loop inside the outer voltage loop. The inner loop normally acts much faster than the outer voltage loop, so that the inner loop predominates the outer loop in transient operation. In this way the inner loop establishes the inductor current according to the load demand. The inner current loop also keeps this current to a preset maximum value during transient operation, such as at start or when the load is short circuited by the uncharged capacitor. It thus protects the devices during starting and sudden abnormal working conditions. Because these currents also reflect the D Dynamics and ontrol 27 F. Rahman of D D onverters

level of the load current, the controlled level of current in the switch or the inductor L also represents the demanded current by the load. The structure of such a control system is indicated in Figure 5.. Figure 5. The switch, or the inductor current, can be sensed and fed back as indicated in Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2 Dynamics and ontrol 28 F. Rahman of D D onverters

Types of current controllers. Hysteresis band control: t on and t off according to hysteresis band settings. Figure 5.3 2. onstant toff control; t on according to il max or i sw max. Schemes and 2 have varying switching frequency. 3. onstant f s control; t on according to i L max or i swmax, t off according to T s. Switch turn-on occurs at preset clock times. This scheme is widely used. 4. ontinuous current control with PWM also widely used. This scheme controls the average level of current in the switch or in the inductors. 5. Adaptive hysteresis band control. The adaptation tends to keep the switching frequency over a narrow Dynamics and ontrol 29 F. Rahman of D D onverters

range. Difficult for the hysteresis band to be made fully adaptive. With continuous current control, the two-stage converter controller design reduces to an inner current controller and an outer voltage controller which are de-coupled. This means that inner loop has a much higher band-width than the outer loop, so that designs for each can be approached separately or independently. With the fast inner current loop, the representation of the outer voltage loop is now simplified, as indicated below for a buck converter. The inductor current is regulated by the inner current controller. The outer voltage loop compensator output defines the current reference for this current loop. Assuming that the inductor current reaches steady-state much quicker than the outer voltage loop, we can represent v 0 dynamics as Figure 5.4 Dynamics and ontrol 30 F. Rahman of D D onverters

Rc 0() () s src I s IL s IL() s RR ( R Rc ) s c s R( sr c ) V0() s I0() s R IL() s ( R R ) s c V0 () s R( sr c ) I () s s( R R ) ( T s) L c F With high bandwidth inner current loop, the current control loop is represented by IL() s ds () Ts Note our assumption: ( RR ) R T i c c i Gain and phase plots (Bode diagram) of an uncompensated Buck converter, the inner current controller, the PI voltage controller and the open-loop transfer function of the compensated voltage controlled system are indicated in Figure 5.5. It should be noted that with the inner current controller, the PI controller for the outer voltage loop can be designed with more favourable phase margin. In fact, with the inner current Dynamics and ontrol 3 F. Rahman of D D onverters

controller, the phase plot may not be needed as the phase lag of the voltage control system may have adequate phase margin to start with. Thus, a PI controller which gives zero steady-state error can be designed easily. Figure 5.5: Bode diagrams for a Buck converter. Dynamics and ontrol 32 F. Rahman of D D onverters