An Introduction to the Stolz-Teichner Program

Similar documents
Equivariant de Rham cohomology and gauged field theories

1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results

Field theories and algebraic topology

10:30-12:00 (1) Elliptic Cohomology and Conformal Field Theories: An Introduction. (Prof. G. Laures) Example: Heat operator, Laplace operator.

Lecture 17: Invertible Topological Quantum Field Theories

On 2-Representations and 2-Vector Bundles

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 5 Oct 1999

h M (T ). The natural isomorphism η : M h M determines an element U = η 1

Supersymmetric field theories and generalized cohomology

Notes on p-divisible Groups

1 Categorical Background

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

Lecture 15: Duality. Next we spell out the answer to Exercise It is part of the definition of a TQFT.

IndCoh Seminar: Ind-coherent sheaves I

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection

RATIONAL COHOMOLOGY FROM SUPERSYMMETRIC FIELD THEORIES

Lecture 4 Super Lie groups

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory

Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models

Math 210B. Profinite group cohomology

Complexes of Hilbert C -modules

NOTES ON ATIYAH S TQFT S

Holomorphic symplectic fermions

Topological K-theory, Lecture 3

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

VERLINDE ALGEBRA LEE COHN. Contents

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7)

arxiv: v1 [math.at] 3 Oct 2016

Categorical techniques for NC geometry and gravity

Groupoid Representation Theory

The Structure of Fusion Categories via Topological Quantum Field Theories

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS

Derived Algebraic Geometry III: Commutative Algebra

NilBott Tower of Aspherical Manifolds and Torus Actions

Introduction to the Baum-Connes conjecture

LOCAL VS GLOBAL DEFINITION OF THE FUSION TENSOR PRODUCT

On algebraic index theorems. Ryszard Nest. Introduction. The index theorem. Deformation quantization and Gelfand Fuks. Lie algebra theorem

A Taxonomy of 2d TQFTs

THE H-PRINCIPLE, LECTURE 14: HAEFLIGER S THEOREM CLASSIFYING FOLIATIONS ON OPEN MANIFOLDS

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

Formal Homotopy Quantum Field Theories and 2-groups.

Patrick Iglesias-Zemmour

BRIAN OSSERMAN. , let t be a coordinate for the line, and take θ = d. A differential form ω may be written as g(t)dt,

Lecture 11: Clifford algebras

What is an elliptic object?

Structures in tangent categories

Math Homotopy Theory Spring 2013 Homework 13 Solutions

Groupoids and Orbifold Cohomology, Part 2

1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces

The Dirac-Ramond operator and vertex algebras

A homotopy theory of diffeological spaces

Math 535a Homework 5

something on spin structures sven-s. porst

BEN KNUDSEN. Conf k (f) Conf k (Y )

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

Derived Algebraic Geometry I: Stable -Categories

PICARD GROUPS OF MODULI PROBLEMS II

Supercategories. Urs July 5, Odd flows and supercategories 4. 4 Braided monoidal supercategories 7

Kähler manifolds and variations of Hodge structures

The Nori Fundamental Group Scheme

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, )

LOOP GROUPS AND CATEGORIFIED GEOMETRY. Notes for talk at Streetfest. (joint work with John Baez, Alissa Crans and Urs Schreiber)

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS

Higher Categories, Homotopy Theory, and Applications

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

Introduction (Lecture 1)

Categories and functors

Lecture 9: Sheaves. February 11, 2018

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

SM CATEGORIES AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS

Manifolds, Higher Categories and Topological Field Theories

What are stacks and why should you care?

Duality, Residues, Fundamental class

Takao Akahori. z i In this paper, if f is a homogeneous polynomial, the correspondence between the Kodaira-Spencer class and C[z 1,...

On the homotopy invariance of string topology

Hungry, Hungry Homology

Conformal field theory in the sense of Segal, modified for a supersymmetric context

Atiyah classes and homotopy algebras

Mapping class groups of surfaces and quantization

Introduction to Chiral Algebras

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings

A users guide to K-theory

Lecture 5: Hodge theorem

CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS. Contents. 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R)

arxiv: v2 [math.ra] 14 Sep 2016

Representations and Linear Actions

POSTNIKOV EXTENSIONS OF RING SPECTRA

Nonabelian Poincare Duality (Lecture 8)

PART II.2. THE!-PULLBACK AND BASE CHANGE

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

Equivariantly Twisted Cohomology Theories

Math Homotopy Theory Hurewicz theorem

0.1 Spec of a monoid

Atiyah-Singer Revisited

Deformation groupoids and index theory

PREQUANTIZATION OF SYMPLECTIC SUPERMANIFOLDS

Algebraic Cobordism Lecture 1: Complex cobordism and algebraic cobordism

Transcription:

Intro to STP 1/ 48 Field An Introduction to the Stolz-Teichner Program Australian National University October 20, 2012

Outline of Talk Field Smooth and Intro to STP 2/ 48 Field

Field Motivating Principles Graeme Segal [3] had an idea for describing conformal field theory. Let E M be a vector bundle with connection. Make association to points: for x M we associate x E x For (piecewise smooth) paths γx y between points x and y we associate the parallel transport map, γ y x τ y x : E x Ey. Intro to STP 3/ 48 Field In this way, a 1-dimensional field theory over M may be viewed as a vector bundle with connection.

Field Motivating Principles Intro to STP 4/ 48 Field Segal suggested 2d-CFT over M are cocycles for some elliptic cohomology theory over M. The CFT is given by: and Loops Hilbert Space Conformal Surfaces Hilbert-Schmidt Operators Problem: Excision does not hold

Field Motivating Principles Intro to STP 5/ 48 Field Some results and conjectures to date in the Stolz-Teichner Program: 0-field theories over M = C (M) 0 1-field theories over M = Ω ev cl (M) 1-field theories over M = VB (M) 1 1-field theories over M = K(M) 2 1-field theories over M = TMF (M) (conjectured)

Field Motivating Principles Atiyah started this topological field theory business off [1]. Consider the following categories: Definition The d-dimensional bordism category, d-b, consisting of Objects: Closed (d 1)-manifolds (orientable) Morphisms: d-bordisms (oriented) Definition The category Vect of vector spaces Objects: Vector spaces (finite dimensional) Morphisms: Linear transformations Intro to STP 6/ 48 Field

Field Motivating Principles Intro to STP 7/ 48 Field Definition A d-dimensional topological field theory is a (symmetric monoidal) functor Basically: and (d 1)-dimensional manifolds Vector Spaces d-dimensional bordisms Linear Transformations

Field Motivating Principles Symbolically, the category of d-dimensional TFTs is d-tft := Fun (d-b, Vect R ). Here emphasises symmetric monoidal functors. Suffices to consider closed, connected objects = omit reference to symmetric monoidal structure. In the zero-dimensional case: Objects in 0-B is just Symmetric monoidal = unit unit, so R. Intro to STP 8/ 48 Field Morphisms in 0-B are points, thought of a bordisms. Thus pt λ Hom R (R, R) = R.

Field Motivating Principles Think of R as a discrete category Objects are real numbers λ. Morphisms are identity morphisms. Thus 0-TFT = R as discrete categories. Given by E E(pt) Objective is to obtain invariants of a space X by parametrising 0-TFT by X. Definition Define d-tft(x ) as functors d-b(x ) Vect. Here d-b(x ) is just d-b where objects and bordisms are equipped with a smooth map to X. Bordisms are defined up to diffeomorphism = map to X is diffeomorphism invariant, This is where all the invariant information about X is coming from. Intro to STP 9/ 48 Field

Field Motivating Principles In zero-dimensions: 0-B(X ) consists of Objects: X Morphisms: pt X. As discrete categories: 0-B(X ) = X. Then 0-TFT(X ) = Fun (0-B(X ), Vect) = Fun(X, R) = Maps(X, R). There is no smoothness condition on these maps! Hohnhold et. al., rectify this by adding smoothness and generalise by adding supersymmetry [2]. Idea is to consider families of objects. Intro to STP 10/ 48 Field

Intro to STP 11/ 48 Fibered category theory: Generalise the notion of a bundle over a space to a category-theoretic bundle over a category See [5] for more fibered category theory. Definition A functor p : B S is a fibration if pullbacks exist for every object in S. For example: the following functor is a fibration, F : Vector bundles Base space Field

Intro to STP 12/ 48 Definition Say a category B is fibered over a category S if there exists a fibration p : B S. For s S, the fiber B s over S is the subcategory B s = {(b, f ) B 0 B 1 : (b, f ) (s, id s )} where B 0 are objects and B 1 are morphisms. e.g. VB Man is fibration For S Man the fiber VB S = {bundles over S} A fibered functor F, between categories B and V, fibered over S, is a functor B V that preserves the fibration. Field

Intro to STP 13/ 48 Denote by Fun S (B, V) the category of fibered functors between fibered categories B and V over S. Objects: fibered functors Morphisms: (fibered) natural transformations. Theorem For a functor F : S op Set there exists a corresponding fibration F S. Proof is by construction, Field F = S Set = {(s, F(s)) and morphisms}. Fibration F S is given by the forgetful map.

Intro to STP 14/ 48 Key Point: For an object s S there exists a natural fibration p : s S. Given by thinking of s in terms of its functor of points s S(, s). Then apply theorem. Explicitly s = S S(, s) and the forgetful map s S is a fibration. Fiber is s t = S(t, s) for each t S. Motivation: If V S is a fibration, then Fun S (s, V) = V s. In particular, if V = s, for s S, then Field Fun S (s, s ) = s s = S(s, s ).

Smooth and Definition We define the d-dimensional family bordism category over M, d-b f (M), as a category with, for each manifold S, Objects: d-dimensional fiber bundles Y S with closed, connected fiber and smooth map Y M. Morphisms: bundle morphisms that are fiber-wise diffeomorphisms. Definition A smooth d-dimensional TFT over a manifold M is a fibered functor from d-b f (M) to R, Intro to STP 15/ 48 Field d-tft(m) := Fun Man (d-b f (M), R), where Man is the category of smooth manifolds.

Smooth and Proposition There exists a bijection 0-TFT(M) = C (M). Proof. Note that 0-B f (M) = M since, for each S, 0-B f (M) : S (S M) = M(S). Then for: 0-TFT(M) = Fun Man (0-B f (M), R), Intro to STP 16/ 48 Field 0-TFT(M) = Fun Man (M, R) = Man(M, R) = C (M).

Smooth and Intro to STP 17/ 48 Field For supersymmetric field theories: Generalises straightforwardly. Need to fiber over the category of supermanifolds. Defined for dimension 0 δ. Definition The 0 δ-dimensional family bordism category 0 δ-b f (M) is defined just as non-susy case, except bundles have 0 δ-dimensional fiber. Theorem: (WLOG) It suffices to consider product bundles of the form S R 0 δ S as objects.

Smooth and Definition The category of 0 δ-dimensional TFTs over M is defined as the following fibered functor category, 0 δ-tft(m) := Fun SM (0 δ-b f (M), R), where SM is the category of supermanifolds. Theorem There is a bijection, 0 1-TFT(M) = Ω 0 cl (M). Intro to STP 18/ 48 Field To explain this result we need a better understanding of 0 1-B f (M)

Approach For a supermanifold M SM, we can think of it as S M(S) := SM(S, M). where S varies over all supermanifolds. Note SM(, M) varies functorially (and contravariantly) for all S SM, i.e., for f : T S, SM(f, M) : SM(S, M) SM(T, M) given by φ φ f. Call SM(, M) the functor of points of M. Advantage: There exists a result to the effect (see [2]), SM(S, M) = Alg(C (M), C (S)) = Suffices to look at algebra homomorphisms between smooth functions! Intro to STP 19/ 48 Field

In the functor of points approach we consider embedding given by, SM Fun(SM op, Set) M (S SM(S, M)). This embedding is known as a Yoneda embedding. Call a functor F Fun(SM op, Set) a generalised supermanifold. Generalised supermanifolds in the image of the embedding are representable. i.e., F is representable if it is naturally isomorphic to the functor of points of some N SM. Intro to STP 20/ 48 Field

Intro to STP 21/ 48 Field Denote by SM(, M) the inner Hom For S, T SM the inner Hom satisfies, SM(T, M)(S) = SM(S T, M). Thus SM(T, M) is a generalised supermanifold As it turns out SM(R 0 n, M) is representable! i.e., SM(R 0 n, M) = SM(, N) for some N SM.

For M SM, the odd tangent bundle ΠTM of M is constructed by reversing parity of the fibers of TM. Key point: C (ΠTM) = Ω (M). Local coordinates on ΠTM are (x i, dx i ), where x i are local coordinates on M. Moreover, and C (ΠTM) ev = C (ΠTM, R) = Ω ev (M) Intro to STP 22/ 48 Field C (ΠTM) odd = C (ΠTM, R 0 1 ) = Ω odd (M).

Intro to STP 23/ 48 Field Proposition For any M SM there exists an isomorphism as generalised supermanifolds ( T SM(R 0 1, M)(T )) = (T SM(T, ΠTM)). i.e., SM(R 0 1, M) = ΠTM More generally, it follows by induction that SM(R 0 δ, M) = (ΠT ) δ M

Intro to STP 24/ 48 Field The super-point R 0 1 admits a super-lie group structure: R 0 1 R 0 1 R 0 1 given by (η, θ) η + θ and a dilational action R R 0 1 R 0 1 given by (λ, θ) λθ

Definition The inner Diffeomorphism group of the super-point Diff(R 0 1 ) is the super-lie group-valued functor S Diff S (S R 0 1, S R 0 1 ). The S-subscript denotes compatibility with projection onto S. Diagramatically Diff(R 0 1 ) defines, for each S, the following commutative diagram S R 0 1 S R 0 1 Intro to STP 25/ 48 Field S

Lemma There exists an isomorphism of generalised super-lie groups, Diff(R 0 1 ) = R R 0 1 This means we may think of elements of Diff(R 0 1 ) as pairs (λ, θ) R 1 1. We have a diffeomorphism action on the super-point: given by R 0 1 (R R 0 1 ) R 0 1 Intro to STP 26/ 48 Field (η, (λ, θ)) (ηλ, θ) ηλ + θ.

Intro to STP 27/ 48 Field Diffeomorphism action on R 0 1 extends to an action on ΠTM In local coordinates (x i, dx i ) on ΠTM group action is µ : Diff(R 0 1 ) ΠTM ΠTM given by ( (λ, θ), (x i, dx i ) ) µ (x i + θdx i, λdx i ). On functions µ λ,θ : Ω (M) Ω (M)[θ] is given by Ω k (M) ω µ λ,θ (ω) = λk (ω + θdω).

Intro to STP 28/ 48 Theorem: 0 1-TFT(M) = Ω 0 cl (M). Recall that 0 1-TFT(M) := Fun SM (0 1-B f (M), R). Claim: 0 1-B f (M) is just the fixed point set of the diffeomorphism action on ΠTM. For each S SM we have commutative diagram Field S R 0 1 S S R 0 1 M

The 0 1-Dimensional Case Intro to STP 29/ 48 Commutativity implies SM(R 0 1, M) = ΠTM is invariant under diffeomorphism action. Hence 0 1-B f (M) = ΠTM/Diff(R 0 1 ). This is an equivalence as fibered categories. Then we find 0 1-TFT(M) := Fun SM (0 1-B f (M), R) = C (ΠTM) Diff(R0 1 ) = {ω Ω (M): µ λ,θ ω = ω} Field = Ω 0 cl (M).

Intro to STP 30/ 48 Field It is natural to ask whether we can obtain higher degree de Rham cocycles. We can indeed! Recall the diffeomorphism action µ : Diff(R 0 1 ) ΠTM ΠTM which, on functions, is of the form Ω k (M) ω µ λ,θ (ω) = λk (ω + θdω) To obtain the higher degree cocycles, we need to pick out the multiplicative action.

Intro to STP 31/ 48 Consider the group homomorphism ρ : Diff(R 0 1 ) R We construct, to this homomorphism, the associated line bundle over ΠTM, L := ΠTM ρ R. It defined by the equivalence relation (g ζ, t) (ζ, ρ(g) 1 t) Field for g Diff(R 0 1 ), ζ ΠTM and t R.

Definition A 0 1-field theory of degree k over M, denoted 0 1-TFT k (M), is defined as, 0 1-TFT k (M) := Γ(0 1-B f (M), (ΠL) k ). Recall 0 1-B f (M) = ΠTM/Diff(R 0 1 ). 0 1-B f (M) (ΠL) k are defined by commutativity, ΠTM Diff(R 0 1 ) action ΠTM (ΠL) k Intro to STP 32/ 48 Field quotient ΠTM/Diff(R 0 1 )

Intro to STP 33/ 48 For k = 0 we find 0 1-TFT 0 (M) = C (ΠTM) Diff(R0 1 ) = Ω 0 cl (M) = 0 1-TFT(M). As such 0 1-TFT(M) is by definition untwisted. Parity of L is reversed since Ω k=odd (M) may be described as a vector space with odd variables. Proposition We have bijection Γ(0 1-B f (M), (ΠL) k ) = {µ g (ω) = ρ(g) k ω} Field for g Diff(R 0 1 ) and ω C (ΠTM) = Ω (M).

Intro to STP 34/ 48 Field Recall action µ : Diff(R 0 1 ) ΠTM ΠTM which, on functions, is of the form Ω k (M) ω µ λ,θ (ω) = λk (ω + θdω). Then µ λ,θ ω = λk ω ω Ω k (M) and dω = 0. Thus, 0 1-TFT k (M) = Ω k cl (M).

Intro to STP 35/ 48 Field Can generalise to Euclidean field theories Motivation: Put Riemannian structure on the bundles in the Bordism category specialise to flat Riemannian metrics. Consider subgroup Iso(R 0 1 ) Diff(R 0 1 ) consisting of reflections and odd translations, i.e., Iso(R 0 1 ) = {±1} R 0 1 We have group action Iso(R 0 1 ) on ΠTM, given by Ω k (M) Ω (M)[θ] with ω (±1) k (ω + θdω) Clearly Ω ev cl (M) is invariant under this action.

We define the 0 1-Euclidean bordism family category over M, 0 1-EB(M), just as 0 1-B f (M), replacing Diff(R 0 1 ) by Iso(R 0 1 ). We analogously have 0 1-EB(M) = ΠTM/Iso(R 0 1 ) We define 0 1-EFT(M) in the obvious way, 0 1-EFT(M) := Fun SM (0 1-EB(M), R). Theorem There exists a bijection Intro to STP 36/ 48 Field 0 1-EFT(M) = Ω ev cl (M)

Intro to STP 37/ 48 Field Defining twisted Euclidean field theories in the same way as for ordinary field theories yields the following theorem. Theorem There is a bijection More generally 0 1-EFT 1 (M) = Ω odd cl (M). 0 1-EFT ev/odd (M) = Ω ev/odd cl (M).

Let V M be a vector bundle with a flat connection (i.e. 2 = 0). Denote V -valued differential forms by Ω (M, V ) := Γ(M, V ) C (M) Ω (M). Then : Ω 0 (M, V ) Ω 1 (M, V ). Write d k : Ωk (M, V ) Ω k+1 (M, V ). flat = (d k )2 = 0. The pair (Ω (M, V ), d ) = Ω (M, V ) forms a differential complex. We define the k-th twisted de Rham cohomology group by H k (M, V ) = ker d k /im d k 1 Intro to STP 38/ 48 Field

Intro to STP 39/ 48 Field Motivation: A V -valued field theory reduces to the ordinary field theory if V is the trivial line bundle. Observation: Ω (M, V ) = Γ(ΠTM, π (V, )) where π : ΠTM M and π V ΠTM is bundle with connection π. If V = M R, then Γ(ΠTM, π V ) = C (ΠTM) = Ω (M) and π = d.

Recall: for each S a 0 1-field theory is defined on objects in the bordism category, S R 0 1 S and φ SM(S, ΠTM). Consider the pullback bundle π V For each φ SM(S, ΠTM) we have π V φ = (π φ) V. Want to construct fibered category π V SM Intro to STP 40/ 48 Field with fiber π V S = {Γ(S, (π φ) V ): φ ΠTM S }

Intro to STP 41/ 48 Field Claim: π V ΠTM = Γ(ΠTM, π V ). Note that π V ΠTM = {Γ(ΠTM, (π φ) V ): φ ΠTM ΠTM } For φ ΠTM ΠTM it is cartesian it is an isomorphism If V is equipped with connection then π is connection on π V and π V ΠTM = Γ(ΠTM, π (V, )) = Ω (M, V ).

Definition Define a V -valued 0 1-dimensional field theory over M with (flat) connection by 0 1-TFT (M, V ) := Fun SM (0 1-B f (M), π (V, )) Then 0 1-TFT (M, V ) = Γ(ΠTM, π (V, )) Diff(R0 1 ) = Ω (M, V ) Diff(R0 1). Intro to STP 42/ 48 Field Theorem There exists a bijection, 0 1-TFT (M, V ) = ker. It remains to find Diff(R 0 1 )-action on sections.

Let ξ Γ(M, V ). Note that R 0 1 Thus ξ : ΠTM ΠTV. Φ ξ M V. In this way Diff(R 0 1 ) action extends to action on sections i.e., µ λ,θ : ΠTM ΠTM with µ λ,θ (ξ) := ξ µ λ,θ The generating vector field for Diff(R 0 1 )-action is d. This lifts to an action on sections iff is flat. Intro to STP 43/ 48 Field µ λ,θ (ξ) = ξ + θ ξ. e.g. if V M is trivial line bundle then is just d.

Intro to STP 44/ 48 Field For (λ, θ) Diff(R 0 1 ) we are given Then it follows that is given by µ λ,θ (ξ) = ξ + θ ξ, µ λ,θ : Ω (M, V ) Ω (M, V )[θ] Ω k (M, V ) ω (µ λ,θ )(ω) = λk (ω + θd k ω)

With this group action we find, ) 0 1-TFT (M, V ) := Fun SM (0 1-B f (M), π (V, ) = Ω (M, V ) Diff(R0 1 ) = ker. More generally we define V -valued 0 1-field theories of degree n by 0 1-TFT n (M, V ) = Γ(ΠTM/Diff(R 0 1 ), π (V, ) (ΠL ρ ) n ) Intro to STP 45/ 48 Field where ρ : Diff(R 0 1 ) R and L ρ = ΠTM ρ R is the associated line bundle over ΠTM.

Intro to STP 46/ 48 Field Theorem There exists bijection 0 1-TFT n (M, V ) = ker d n. Theorem follows from structure of Diff(R 0 1 )-action.

I Intro to STP 47/ 48 M. Atiyah, Topological Quantum Field Publications Mathématiques de I HÉS 68 (1989) 175 186 H. Hohnhold, M. Kreck, S. Stolz and P. Teichner, Differential forms and 0-dimensional supersymmetric field theories Quantum Topology, 2(1): (2011) 1 41 G. Segal, Elliptic Cohomology Séminaire Bourbaki 695 (1988) 187 201 S. Stolz and P. Teichner, Supersymmetric and Generalised Cohomology preprint (2008) Field

II Intro to STP 48/ 48 Field A. Vistoli, Grothendieck topologies, fibered categories and descent theory Fundamental Algebraic Geometry, Math. Surveys Monogr. 123, Amer. Math. Soc., Prov- idence, RI, 2005, 1104.