LUMINARY Memo #214 Revision 1

Similar documents
LUMINARY Memo #218. Summary. From the data presented in this memo, it is seen that the performance. From:

Approved- (2 I a-- Date /42.- R. R. RAGAN, EPUTY DIRECTOR INSTRUMENTATION LABORATORY

July 20, The day software bugs nearly lost us the moon. July 20, 2004

Semi-Analytical Guidance Algorithm for Fast Retargeting Maneuvers Computation during Planetary Descent and Landing

PRELIMINAJ3.:( 6/8/92 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION FOR THE DSPSE GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL CSCI. Prepared by

Written by capcom Saturday, 25 October :18 - Last Updated Saturday, 03 January :49

:, :::::::::;:;::::::::::: MSC AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION MSC INTERNAL NOTE NO. 70-FM-64. March 31, 1970

ADVANCED NAVIGATION STRATEGIES FOR AN ASTEROID SAMPLE RETURN MISSION

Apollo 10. The NASA Mission Reports. Compiled from the NASA archives & Edited by Robert Godwin. SUB G6ttingen

Lunar Landing Trajectory and Abort Trajectory Integrated Optimization Design.

21 Flight checklists Mission 1: Delta-glider to ISS

DARE Mission and Spacecraft Overview

PreLaunch Mission Operation Report No. M MEMORANDUM. To: A/Ad ministrator. From: MA/Apollo Program Director

7 Langley Research Center. c> / A SIMPLIFIED GUIDANCE SCHEME. by G. Kimball Miller, Jr. FOR ABORTING LUNAR LANDINGS NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-2504

Crew Exploration Lander for Ganymede, Callisto, and Earth s s Moon - Vehicle System Design (AIAA-2009

MOON AGE AND REGOLITH EXPLORER MISSION DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE 2017 Annual Technical Symposium

APPENDIX TLE TWO-LINE ELEMENT TRACKING

REVISED COORDINATES FOR APOLLO HARDWARE

Remembrances of Apollo. Dr. Ralph P. Pass

The Effect of Navigation State Selection on Fuel Dispersions for Powered Lunar Descent

Guidance Strategy for Hyperbolic Rendezvous

Overview of China Chang'e-3 Mission and Development of Follow-on Mission

Distance = Rate x Time Middle grades

SAFETY GUIDED DESIGN OF CREW RETURN VEHICLE IN CONCEPT DESIGN PHASE USING STAMP/STPA

The Kerbal Space Program

PROGRESS REPORT ON APOLLO PROGRAM

Advanced Descent Solution and Trajectory Generation Scheme for Precise and Safe Lunar Landing Mission

Performance. 7. Aircraft Performance -Basics

IS! C&& CODE) PROJECT APCLLO. A ERiEF II\TVESTIGATIOIV OF CSM WSCUE OF L;EM. MSC IiU'TEmiAL KOTE NO. 64-~~-2. Approved:

Analysis of optimal strategies for soft landing on the Moon from lunar parking orbits

Supplemental info for MCR : Change Science Orbit Period from 11 Days to 14 Days

Sliding Mode Control Strategies for Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers

Attitude Determination and Control

The NEAR Guidance and Control System

CryoSat Monthly Quality Report #93

SELENE TRANSLUNAR TRAJECTORY AND LUNAR ORBIT INJECTION

LOTNAV. A Low-Thrust Interplanetary Navigation Tool: The Trajectory Reconstruction Module

LUMINARY Memo #115. Now the CG matrix is computed throughout the braking and approach. A new lunar landing guidance scheme,

DETERMINATION OF SCIAMACHY LINE-OF-SIGHT MISALIGNMENTS

GP-B Attitude and Translation Control. John Mester Stanford University

ESSE Payload Design. 1.2 Introduction to Space Missions

Apollo 15 Trans-Earth Trajectory Reconstruction

New Worlds Observer Final Report Appendix J. Appendix J: Trajectory Design and Orbit Determination Lead Author: Karen Richon

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Successful Demonstration for Upper Stage Controlled Re-entry Experiment by H-IIB Launch Vehicle

Adaptive Backstepping Control for Optimal Descent with Embedded Autonomy

Science planning and operations for Mars Express

Generation X. Attitude Control Systems (ACS) Aprille Ericsson Dave Olney Josephine San. July 27, 2000

MSL DSENDS EDL ANALYSIS AND OPERATIONS

Lunar Orbit Propellant Transfer

Guidance and Control Algorithm Robustness Baseline Indexing

The post launch assessment review confirmed the following previous assertions about the mission status:

Improving Angles-Only Navigation Performance by Selecting Sufficiently Accurate Accelerometers

What is the InterPlanetary Superhighway?

Attitude Control Simulator for the Small Satellite and Its Validation by On-orbit Data of QSAT-EOS

THE TRAJECTORY CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR AKATSUKI RE-INSERTION INTO THE VENUS ORBIT

ESMO Mission Analysis

INDIRECT PLANETARY CAPTURE VIA PERIODIC ORBIT ABOUT LIBRATION POINTS

End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

NEW HORIZONS PLUTO APPROACH NAVIGATION

Upper Atmospheric Monitoring for Ares I-X Ascent Loads and Trajectory Evaluation on the Day-of-Launch

Autonomous Vision Based Detection of Non-stellar Objects Flying in Formation with Camera Point of View

ASTRIUM. Interplanetary Path Early Design Tools at ASTRIUM Space Transportation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation.

Prediction of Top of Descent Location for Idle-thrust Descents

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Feedback Control of Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers using Differential Drag

SOLVING THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS) MOTION CONTROL LONG-TERM PLANNING PROBLEM

SPACE SHUTTLE ROLL MANEUVER

Status of X-ray Astronomy Satellite Hitomi (ASTRO-H)

L-3 Avionics Systems SkyWatch Traffic Advisory System

Europe to the Moon. BHF 10 Feb 2005 SPC

The time period while the spacecraft is in transit to lunar orbit shall be used to verify the functionality of the spacecraft.

Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Preliminary Design Review James Black Matt Marcus Grant McLaughlin Michelle Sultzman

Adaptive Guidance and Control for Autonomous Hypersonic Vehicles

Asteroid Approach Final Report Foundations of Cyber Physical Systems. Kerry Snyder

Thermal And Near infrared Sensor for carbon Observation (TANSO) onboard the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) Research Announcement

Conjunction Risk Assessment and Avoidance Maneuver Planning Tools

Technical Description for Aventus NowCast & AIR Service Line

Earth Departure Trajectory Reconstruction of Apollo Program Components Undergoing Disposal in Interplanetary Space

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

LOCAL VERTICAL/LOCAL HORIZONTAL ATTITUDE CONTROL FOR SPARTAN SPACECRAFT. James R. Morrissey C. T. A. Incorporated Beltsville, Maryland, USA 20705

ASEN 6008: Interplanetary Mission Design Lab Spring, 2015

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Mission Design: A Pegasus Class Mission to a High Energy Orbit

SP-1291 June Mars Express. The Scientific Investigations

INNOVATIVE STRATEGY FOR Z9 REENTRY

Autonomous optimal trajectory design employing convex optimization for powered descent on an asteroid

MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: UMd Exploration Initiative U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

Flight and Orbital Mechanics. Exams

Gravity Turn Concept. Curvilinear Coordinate System Gravity Turn Manoeuvre concept Solutions for Constant Pitch Rate

FOR PROJECTS GEMINI AND APOLLO

Design and modelling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite operations

LOW-COST LUNAR COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION

2008 Annual C-FOQA Statistical Summary Report

APOPHIS EXPRESS, A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY FOR A HUMAN VISIT TO A NEO IN 2029

Technical Description for Aventus NowCast & AIR Service Line

Space Exploration Earth and Space. Project Mercury Courtesy of NASA Images

DARE Dynamic Abort Risk Evaluator Analysis Process Document

(. X-Zy6,- JF 1. HATIoN4L AERONAIRTCS AND SP#CE WIMINIs'rRATIm MANNED SMCECRAFT CEm'ER

Verified High-Order Optimal Control in Space Flight Dynamics

Ulrich Walter. Astronautics. The Physics of Space Flight. 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition

Transcription:

Massachusetts Institute of Technology C. S. Draper Laboratory Cambridge, Massachusetts LUMINARY Memo #214 Revision 1 To: Distribution From: Luminary Test Group Date: 6 April 1971 Subject: Level 6 for Luminary IE This memo includes a detailed description of 16 level 6 digital simulation tests which fall into the following general categories: 6.1.0 RENDEZVOUS 6.2.0 ABORTS FROM DESCENT 6.3.0 LUNAR SURFACE OPERATIONS, ALIGNMENTS, ASCENT 6. 4. 0 LANDING ON LUNAR SURFACE 6.5.0 SPECIAL TESTS The test initialization listed below apply to all the tests and any special initial conditions will be indicated in the particular test. (1) 1o IMU, Radar, State Vector Errors. (2) Normal Astronaut interface from Apollo 15 Data File. (3) Apollo 15 Operation Trajectory. (4) Apollo 15 Erasable Load. (5) 71/72 Ephemeris. (6) 0 TLOSS. (7) LM-10 Vehicle.

TEST 6. 1. 1 RENDEZVOUS This test is made to verify the nominal LM Active Short Rendezvous. Timeline I : TPI -38 TPI +45 1 LGC Idling P20 Rendezvous Navigation P34 Transfer Phase Initiation (TPI) P42 APS P35 Transfer Phase Midcourse (TPM) P41 RCS P35 Transfer Phase Midcourse (TPM) P41 P47 RCS LGC Idling Thrust Monitor LGC Idling Extended Verbs V47 Initialize AGS (R47) V48 Start DAP Data Load (R03) V63 Start RR/LR Self Test Routine (R04) V64 V67 V80 V82 V83 V93 V95 S-Band Antenna Routine (R05) W Matrix RMS Error Display Enable LM State Vector Update Request Orbit Param Display (R30) Request Rendezvous Param Display (R31) Enable W Matrix Initialization No Update of Either State Vector

I 1. 10% TLOSS during powered flights. 3

TEST 6, 2.1 ABORT AT 33 K. FT. Verify proper operation and ascertain performance of the DPS Abort Program P70 in Luminary revision 210. This test is run with ABORT discrete present before entering P63. Idle Program V48 DAP Data Load. V64 P63 V57 Set Abort Backup S-Band Antenna Routine (R05) Braking Phase Program State Vector Update Routine; LR Update (R12) Manual Throttle to 99% and ABORT at 33K ft. ATTITUDE HOLD P70 DPS Abort Program Switch to AUTO V64 V82 V83 P20 P32 LGC Idling Program S-Band Antenna Routine (R05) Orbital Parameters Display Routine (R30) Rendezvous Parameter Display Routine (R31) Rendezvous Navigation Program Coelliptic Sequence Initiation Program While in P70 the following exercises will be performed: I. Manual yaw maneuver to observe vehicle attitude control response to ACA when mode control is AUTO Monitor N76, N77, N85 via V16. I 1. Environment initialization A. Terrain profile with +1 errors. B. 10% TLOSS 2. CHANBKUP abort discrete set in. 4 -

TEST 6. 2. 2 ABORT AT 7K FT. Verify operation and ascertain performance of the APS Abort Program (after DPS depletion in the DPS Abort Program) in Luminary revision 210. This test is run with the ABORT discrete present V48 V64 P63 V57 P64 Idle Program DAP Data Load Set Abort Backup S-Band Antenna Routine (R05) Braking Phase Program State Vector Update Routine; LR Update (R12) Approach Phase Program Manual Throttle to 99% and ABORT at 7K ft. ATTITUDE HOLD P70 DPS Abort Program Switch to AUTO ABORT STAGE at DPS depletion ATTITUDE HOLD P71 APS Abort Program Switch to AUTO V64 V82 V83 P20 P32 LGC Idling Program S-Band Antenna Routine (R05) Orbital Parameters Display Routine (R30) Rendezvous Parameters Display Routine (R31) Rendezvous Navigation Program Coelliptic Sequence Initiation Program While in P70, the following exercise will be performed (until DPS depletion): I. Monitor N76, N77, N85 via V16. 5 "

While in P71, the following exercises will be performed: I. Manual yaw maneuver to observe vehicle attitude control response to ACA when mode control is ATTHOLD. Monitor N76, N77, N85 via V16. I 1. Environment Initialization A. Terrain profile with +1 errors. B. 10% TLOSS 2. CHANBKUP abort discrete set in. (S

DAP TEST 6. 2. 3 ABORT AFTER TOUCHDOWN Verify operation and ascertain performance of the APS Abort Program (after a nominal Lunar Landing) in Luminary revision 210. This test is run with the ABORT present. Idle Program V48 P63 V57 P64 P66 Data Load Routine (R03) Set abort channel backup Braking Phase Program State Vector Update Routine; LR Update (R12) Approach Phase Program Vertical Phase Program (R. O. D. -Auto) ABORT STAGE at touchdown ATTITUDE HOLD P71 APS Abort Program Switch to AUTO V64 V82 Y83 P20 P32 LGC Idling Program S-Band Antenna Program (R05) Orbital Parameters Display Routine (R30) Rendezvous Parameters Display Routine (R31) Rendezvous Navigation Program Coelliptic Sequence Initiation Program While in P71, the following exercises will be performed: I. Manual yaw maneuver to observe vehicle attitude control response to ACA when mode control is ATTHOLD. Monitor N76, N77, N85 via V16. 7

HI. 1. Environment Initialization A. Terrain profile with +1 errors B. 10% TLOSS 2. CHANBKUP abort discrete set in It

3 TEST 6.3.1 LUNAR SURFACE OPERATIONS This test is made to demonstrate the LM IMU alignment capability for a nominal program sequence during the lunar surface stay. P68 Lunar Surface Confirmation Program P12 Ascent Program P57 AT=1 Lunar Surface Alignment to REFSMMAT (Recycle Gravity Determination) (Reject Noun 93) V41N72 Radar Designate P57 P57 V47 P06 P57 V64 V63 AT-2 Lunar Surface Alignment to REFSMMAT (Star and Planet) AT-2 Lunar Surface Alignment to REFSMMAT (2 stars) AGS Initialization Radar Selftest LGC Power Down Program AT- Lunar Surface Alignment to Landing Site (1 star, Spiral-Cursor marks) S-Band Antenna Routine P22 Lunar Surface Navigation (No Update Mode) V48 DAP Data Load P57 AT- Lunar Surface Alignment to Landing Site (1 star) V47 AGS Initialization Routine V48 DAP Data Load

V82 P12 Orbital Parameter Display Ascent Program (Terminate at TIG -5) /6

TEST 6, 3. 1,1 INFLIGHT ALIGNMENTS This test is made to demonstrate the LM IMU alignment capability for a nominal program sequence using the P57 sighting mark procedure and normal inflight mark procedure. V48 DAP Data Load V41N72 RADAR Designate P52 Alignment to REFSMMAT V48 P52 Select P57 Sighting Procedure (star-planet, DAP Data Load Cursor-Spiral marks) Alignment to REFSMMAT (2 stars, normal X-Y marks) P52 Alignment to REFSMMAT (Sun- Planet, normal X-Y marks) I 1. IMU errors to reflect docked coarse aligned IMU. //

TEST 6. 3. 2 ASCENT FROM LUNAR SURFACE This test is made to verify LM performance for a nominal program sequence for Ascent from the Lunar Surface. P68 V48 P12 Lunar Surface Confirmation DAP Data Load Ascent Target for 1 n. m. out-of-plane Yaw LM 40 after the nominal pitch over V64 V83 V82 P20 S-Band Antenna Routine Request Rendezvous Parameter Display Request Orbital Parameter Display Rendezvous Navigation No state vector update V83 P34 Request Rendezvous Parameter Display TPI HI. 1. 10% TLOSS

TEST 6.4.1 LUNAR LANDING This test is made to verify LM performance during an automatic landing program sequence. This test will exercise the landing site redesignation option prior to PDI to update targeted landing site. throughout the landing. The 50 degrees is removed at PDI +3 min. The abort discrete is failed The LM is yawed left 50 degrees at PDI -3 min. N69 Landing Site Redesignation at PDI -10 min. V48 P63 V57 Down track -6865 ft. Cross track +417 ft. Altitude +380 ft. DAP Data Load Set ABORT Backup Discrete Braking Phase at PDI -5 min. LR Enable N69 Landing Site Redesignation at PDI +5 min. Down track +653 ft. Cross track +662 ft. N68 Monitor range, TGO, Velocity N92 Monitor throttle CMD, HDOT, H P64 P66 P68 Approach Phase Vertical Phase Lunar Surface confirmation I o 1. Terrain profile (+1 ) error * /5

TEST 6. 4. 2. 1 LUNAR LANDING This test is made to verify LM performance during a nominal landing program sequence. This test sequence exercises the landing site redesignation option in P63. The abort discrete is failed in P63, P64, P66. LM is yawed left 50 degrees at TIG -3 min. The 50 degrees is removed at TIG +3 min. V48 P63 N69 DAP Data Load Set ABORT BACKUP Braking Phase Landing Site Redesignation at TIG +30 sec. Down range 10 K ft. P64 P66 Cross range 5 K ft. Approach Phase Vertical Phase Entered at 700 ft. - Attitude Hold and ± ROD switch I 1. Terrain profile (+1 ) error.

TEST 6.4. 2. 2 LUNAR LANDING This test is made to verify LM performance using nominal program procedures. This test sequence exercises the landing site redesignation options in P63 and P64. The abort discrete is failed prior to P63. LM is yawed left 50 degrees at TIG -3 min. The 50 degrees is removed at TIG +3. V48 DAP Data Load Set ABORT Backup P63 Braking Phase N69 Land Site Redesignation at TIG +30 sec. Downtrack 20 K ft P64 P66 Crosstrack 20 K ft Approach Phase ACA: 2(-EL), 2(+AZ) Vertical Phase Enter at 700 ft. manually I 1. 10% TLOSS 2. Terrain profile (+1 ) error.

TEST 6. 4. 2. 3 LUNAR LANDING This test is made to verify LM performance using nominal program procedures. This test sequence exercises the landing site redesignation option in P64. LM is yawed left 50 degrees at TIG -3 min. The 50 degrees is removed at TIG +3. V48 P63 DAP Data Load Set ABORT BACKUP Braking Phase V57 LR Enable N68 Monitor Range, TGO, VI N92 Thrust Monitor P64 Approach Phase Redesignate ACA: 2(+EL), 2(-AZ) P66 Vertical Phase Entered at 700 ft. Attitude Hold and ± ROD increments I 1. Terrain profile (+1 ) error.

TEST 6.5.1 LM RCS DEORBIT BURN Verify proper operation and ascertain performance of the Erasable Memory RCS Guided Burn for LM Deorbit (P99) in Luminary revision 210. The procedure followed is that enumerated in Luminary Memo #211 Rev. 1 The following sequence is used in the test: LGC Idling Program V82 V48 P30 V48 V96 Orbital Parameters Display Routine (R30) DAP Data Load Routine (R03) External AV Targetting Program DAP Data Load Routine (R03) Extended Verb to Interrupt Integration and GOTOH V71 Universal Update - Block Address V71 Universal Update - Block Address V71 Universal Update - Block Address V71 Universal Update - Block Address V72 Universal Update - Single Address V5N26 Verification of P99 address V30 Request executive; call P99 V82 Orbital Parameters Displays Routine (R30) LGC Idling Program In the above sequence, the astronaut egresses from the LM after V96; so that the ground continues at the uplink sequence, V71. I 1. Approved procedure and uplink for P99 as enumerated in Luminary Memo #211 Rev. 1. 2. Environment Initialization A. CG and mass (fuel loadings, etc. ) as agreed upon with MPAD; Guidance and Performance Division. /7

TEST 6. 5. 3 ABORT STAGE AFTER TOUCHDOWN Verify operation and ascertain performance of the APS Abort Program (after a nominal Lunar Landing) in Luminary revision 210. The Auto Throttle Backup discrete is The Abort Backup discrete is clear. set during test sequence. LGC Idling Program V48 DAP Data Load Routine (R03) Set Auto Throttle Backup discrete P63 Braking Phase Program V57 State Vector Update Routine; LR Update (R12) P64 Approach Phase Program P66 Vertical Phase Program (R. O. D. - Auto) Abort Stage after Touchdown P71 APS Abort Program LGC Idling Program V64 S-Band Antenna Routine (R05) V82 Orbital Parameters Display Routine (R30) V83 Rendezvous Parameter Display Routine (R31) P20 Rendezvous Navigation Program P32 Coelliptic Sequence Initiation Program While in P71, the following sequences will be performed: I. Manual yaw maneuver to observe vehicle attitude control response to ACA when mode control is ATTHOLD. Monitor N76, N77, N85 via V16.

I 1. Environment Initialization A. Terrain Profile with +1 errors. B. 10% TLOSS 2. CHANBKUP abort discrete not set (abort discrete not present) H

TEST 6.5.4 LUNAR LANDING Verify operation and ascertain performance of a lunar landing sequence in which P66 is entered at 700 ft. landing proceeds from there. altitude and the The Auto Throttle backup discrete is set. LGC Idling Program V48 DAP Data Load Routine (R03) Set Auto Throttle Backup discrete P63 Braking Phase Program V57 State Vector Update Routine (LR Update; R12) N69 Downtrack 10k ft, crosstrack 5k ft at TIG +5 min. P64 Approach Phase Program P66 Vertical Descent Program (R. O. D. -ATTHOLD) P68 Landing Confirmation Program LGC Idling Program I 1. Environment Initialization A. Terrain profile with +1 error B. 10% TLOSS 2. CHANBKUP abort discrete not set (abort discrete not present)

TEST 6,5,5 DOCKED DPS PLANE CHANGE BURN Verify operation and ascertain performance of the plane-change burn while in the Docked Configuration. LGC Idling Programs V48 R03, DAP Data Load Routine; Load DAP for docked configuration V62 Display Total Attitude Error V77 P30 P40 V82 Rate Command and Attitude Hold External Delta- V Targetting Program DPS Burn Program Orbital Parameter Display Routine (R30) LGC Idling Program I 1. State Vectors, TIG, AV required to be supplied by MPAD at NASA/MS 2. Environment Initialization: CG and Mass (fuel loadings, etc. ) as given by MPAD at NASA/MSC. X\

TEST 6. 5, 6 DOCKED DPS TEI BURN Verify operation and ascertain performance of the TEI burn while in the Docked Configuration. LGC Idling Program V48 R03, DAP Data Load Routine; Load DAP for docked configuration V62 Display Total Attitude Errors V77 P30 P40 V82 Rate Command and Attitude Hold External Delta -V Targetting Program DPS Burn Program Orbital Parameter Display Routine (R30) LGC Idling Program I 1. State vectors, TIG, AV as required to be supplied by MPAD at NASA/MSC. 2. Environment Initialization: CG and Mass (fuel loadings, etc. ) as given by MPAD at NASA/MSC 0