CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM

Similar documents
Math 530 Lecture Notes. Xi Chen

Algebra IV. Contents. Alexei Skorobogatov. December 12, 2017

7. Localization. (d 1, m 1 ) (d 2, m 2 ) d 3 D : d 3 d 1 m 2 = d 3 d 2 m 1. (ii) If (d 1, m 1 ) (d 1, m 1 ) and (d 2, m 2 ) (d 2, m 2 ) then

Step 1. Analytic Properties of the Riemann zeta function [2 lectures]

2.1 Derivatives and Rates of Change

CHAPTER 1 : DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. 1.1 The definition of a differentiable manifold

JUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER DIFFERENTIATION 2 (Rates of change) A.J.Hobson

Notes on Lie Groups, Lie algebras, and the Exponentiation Map Mitchell Faulk

REVERSIBILITY FOR DIFFUSIONS VIA QUASI-INVARIANCE. 1. Introduction We look at the problem of reversibility for operators of the form

1 Definition of the derivative

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 15, JULY 10

The planar Chain Rule and the Differential Equation for the planar Logarithms

FURTHER BOUNDS FOR THE ESTIMATION ERROR VARIANCE OF A CONTINUOUS STREAM WITH STATIONARY VARIOGRAM

NOTES ON EULER-BOOLE SUMMATION (1) f (l 1) (n) f (l 1) (m) + ( 1)k 1 k! B k (y) f (k) (y) dy,

Periods of quadratic twists of elliptic curves

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 3

PDE Notes, Lecture #11

REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 5

LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF ORDER 1. where a(x) and b(x) are functions. Observe that this class of equations includes equations of the form

Math 115 Section 018 Course Note

Rules of Differentiation

A. Incorrect! The letter t does not appear in the expression of the given integral

3. Prove or disprove: If a space X is second countable, then every open covering of X contains a countable subcollection covering X.

0.1 The Chain Rule. db dt = db

Examples of function spaces

SINGULAR PERTURBATION AND STATIONARY SOLUTIONS OF PARABOLIC EQUATIONS IN GAUSS-SOBOLEV SPACES

arxiv: v2 [math.cv] 2 Mar 2018

Homotopy colimits in model categories. Marc Stephan

Calculus of Variations

Define each term or concept.

Solutions Final Exam May. 14, 2014

Darboux s theorem and symplectic geometry

1 Lecture 20: Implicit differentiation

Math Chapter 2 Essentials of Calculus by James Stewart Prepared by Jason Gaddis

Sturm-Liouville Theory

ACTIONS IN MODIFIED CATEGORIES OF INTEREST WITH APPLICATION TO CROSSED MODULES Dedicated to Teimuraz Pirashvili on his 60th birthday

Munkres Chapter 9. The Fundamental Group

Cohomology of Stacks

Schrödinger s equation.

Cohomology of Stacks

Witt#5: Around the integrality criterion 9.93 [version 1.1 (21 April 2013), not completed, not proofread]

COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 2014

A Note on Exact Solutions to Linear Differential Equations by the Matrix Exponential

Zachary Scherr Math 503 HW 5 Due Friday, Feb 26

Similar Operators and a Functional Calculus for the First-Order Linear Differential Operator

Hungry, Hungry Homology

11.7. Implicit Differentiation. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

MAT 545: Complex Geometry Fall 2008

1 Lecture 13: The derivative as a function.

Euler equations for multiple integrals

The derivative of a function f(x) is another function, defined in terms of a limiting expression: f(x + δx) f(x)

ON THE OPTIMAL CONVERGENCE RATE OF UNIVERSAL AND NON-UNIVERSAL ALGORITHMS FOR MULTIVARIATE INTEGRATION AND APPROXIMATION

February 21 Math 1190 sec. 63 Spring 2017

Iterated Point-Line Configurations Grow Doubly-Exponentially

Differentiability, Computing Derivatives, Trig Review

Homotopy and homology groups of the n-dimensional Hawaiian earring

Table of Common Derivatives By David Abraham

Lecture 4 : General Logarithms and Exponentials. a x = e x ln a, a > 0.

2 ODEs Integrating Factors and Homogeneous Equations

Math 328 Course Notes

THE DIVERGENCE. 1. Interpretation of the divergence 1 2. The divergence theorem Gauss law 6

Differentiability, Computing Derivatives, Trig Review. Goals:

ALGEBRAICALLY TRIVIAL, BUT TOPOLOGICALLY NON-TRIVIAL MAP. Contents 1. Introduction 1

CLARK-OCONE FORMULA BY THE S-TRANSFORM ON THE POISSON WHITE NOISE SPACE

Math Implicit Differentiation. We have discovered (and proved) formulas for finding derivatives of functions like

Witten s Proof of Morse Inequalities

Differentiation Rules. Oct

TEST CODE: PMB SYLLABUS

Outline. MS121: IT Mathematics. Differentiation Rules for Differentiation: Part 1. Outline. Dublin City University 4 The Quotient Rule

Implicit Differentiation

ALGEBRAIC AND ANALYTIC PROPERTIES OF ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS

1 Lecture 18: The chain rule

Fundamental group. Chapter The loop space Ω(X, x 0 ) and the fundamental group

Math Notes on differentials, the Chain Rule, gradients, directional derivative, and normal vectors

Proof of SPNs as Mixture of Trees

Math 225A: Differential Topology, Homework 4

Cauchy s Theorem (rigorous) In this lecture, we will study a rigorous proof of Cauchy s Theorem. We start by considering the case of a triangle.

Free rotation of a rigid body 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon Physics 611, Theoretical Mechanics 5 November 2012

4.2 First Differentiation Rules; Leibniz Notation

Derivatives and the Product Rule

MATH 120 Theorem List

MORE CONSEQUENCES OF CAUCHY S THEOREM

Linear Algebra- Review And Beyond. Lecture 3

Section The Chain Rule and Implicit Differentiation with Application on Derivative of Logarithm Functions

Math 341: Convex Geometry. Xi Chen

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY OF CURVES AND SURFACES 7. Geodesics and the Theorem of Gauss-Bonnet

f(x) f(a) Limit definition of the at a point in slope notation.

Analysis IV, Assignment 4

Algebraic Topology Homework 4 Solutions

8/28/2017 Assignment Previewer

x = c of N if the limit of f (x) = L and the right-handed limit lim f ( x)

Section 7.2. The Calculus of Complex Functions

Math 225B: Differential Geometry, Homework 6

LECTURE 1: BASIC CONCEPTS, PROBLEMS, AND EXAMPLES

Differentiation Rules Derivatives of Polynomials and Exponential Functions

Markov Chains in Continuous Time

arxiv: v2 [math.at] 29 Aug 2015

Math 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan

(a 1 m. a n m = < a 1/N n

Transcription:

CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM XI CHEN 1. Differential Forms, Integration an Stokes Theorem Let X be an open set in R n an C (X) be the set of complex value C functions on X. A ifferential 1-form is (1.1) ω = f 1 (x 1, x 2,..., x n )x 1 + f 2 (x 1, x 2,..., x n )x 2 +... + f n (x 1, x 2,..., x n )x n = f i x i for some f i C (X). Let { } (1.2) Ω X = Ω 1 X = f i x i : f i C (X). We can consier Ω X as a free moule generate by x 1, x 2,..., x n over the ring C (X). Let Ω X = C (X) an { } (1.3) Ω k X = k Ω X = fi x I : f I C (X), I {1, 2,..., n}, I = k where we use the notation x I for (1.4) x I = x i1 x i2... x ik for I = {i 1, i 2,..., i k } with i 1 < i 2 <... < i k. So Ω k X is a free moule over C (X) generate by x I. Obviously, Ω k X = for k > n an Ω k X is a grae ring (noncommutative without multiplicative ientity) with multiplication efine by the wege prouct (1.5) : (ω 1, ω 2 ) ω 1 ω 2. Note that (1.6) ω 1 ω 2 = ( 1) k 1k 2 ω 2 ω 1 for ω i Ω k i X. In particular, Ω 2k X is a commutative ring without multiplicative ientity. The wege prouct also gives us a pairing (1.7) Ω k X Ω n k X ω 1 ω 2 ω 1 ω 2 Ω n X = C (X). Date: January 18, 218. 1

2 XI CHEN We have the ifferential operator : C (X) Ω X efine by (1.8) f = f x 1 x 1 + f x 2 x 2 +... + f x n x n for f C an can extene to Ω k X Ωk+1 X by (1.9) (f I x I ) = f I x I. So we can think as an operator on n (1.1) It satisfies Leibniz rule k= Ω k X n Ω k X. k= (1.11) (ω 1 ω 2 ) = ω 1 ω 2 + ( 1) k ω 1 ω 2 for ω 1 Ω k X an (1.12) 2 =. An (1.12) shows that inuces a complex (1.13) Ω X on Ω X with (1.14) im(ω k 1 X Ω 1 X Ω 2 X Ω k X) ker(ω k X... Ω n X Ω k+1 X ). Definition 1.1. Let X an Y be open sets in R n an R m, respectively. For a C function F : Y X, we have a ring homomorphism (1.15) F : C (X) C (Y ) sening f to f F an corresponingly a homomorphism of moules (1.16) F : Ω k X Ω k Y efine by (1.17) for F = (F 1, F 2,..., F n ). F (f I x i1 x i2... x ik ) = (f I F )F i1 (y 1, y 2,..., y m ) Clearly, F satisfies (1.18) (F G) = F G (F ω) = F (ω) F i2 (y 1, y 2,..., y m )... F ik (y 1, y 2,...y m ) for all C functions F 1 : Y X an F 2 : Z Y an all ω Ω X. For a measurable subset M X an an n-form ω Ω n X, we efine the integral (1.19) ω = fx 1 x 2...x n for ω = fx 1 x 2... x n. M M

CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM 3 For a C map F : Y X, a measurable subset M Y an an m-form ω Ω m X, we have a well-efine integral M F M. Theorem 1.2 (Stokes Theorem on Cubes). Let D n = { x i 1 : i = 1, 2,...n} R n be the n-cube, F : D X be a C map an ω be an (n 1)-form on X. Then (1.2) (F ω) = F ω = ( 1) i (Fi,ω Fi,1ω) D n D n D n 1 where F i,t : D n 1 X are the maps given by (1.21) F i,t (x 1, x 2,..., x n 1 ) = F (x 1, x 2,..., x i 1, t, x i,..., x n 1 ). Proof. Let (1.22) F ω = Then (1.23) (F ω) = an (1.24) (F ω) = D n = = f i x 1 x 2... x i... x n. D n ( 1) i+1 f i x i x 1 x 2... x n ( 1) i+1 f i x i x 1 x 2... x n ( 1) i+1 f i x 1 x 2...x n D n x i ( 1) i (f i (x 1, x 2,..., x i 1,, x i+1,...x n ) D n 1 f i (x 1, x 2,..., x i 1, 1, x i+1,...x n ))x 1 x 2... x i...x n = ( 1) i (Fi,ω Fi,1ω). D n 1 Although F an ω are C in the theorem, we just nee them to be C 1 in orer for (1.2) to hol. For a C 1 map F an a C 1 form ω, we can erive this from the theorem by approximating F an ω using a sequence of C functions F m an forms ω m uner C 1 -norm. For approximating continuous functions by smooth functions, we quote Stone-Weierstrass Theorem:

4 XI CHEN Theorem 1.3 (Stone-Weierstrass Theorem). Let X be a compact Hausorff space, C(X, C) be the complex-value continuous functions on X an S be a subset of C(X, C) which separates points. Then the complex unital -algebra generate by S is ense in C(X, C). 2. Homotopy Version of Cauchy Integral Theorem Let X an Y be two topological spaces. We say two continuous maps f : X Y an g : X Y are homotopy if there exists a continuous function F : X [, 1] Y such that F (x, ) f(x) an F (x, 1) g(x). We consier a close curve : S 1 X, which is a continuous function from the circle R/Z to X. Alternatively, we can regar it as a continuous function : [, 1] X satisfying () = (1). Two close curves 1 : S 1 X an 2 : S 1 X are homotopic if there exists a continuous function F : S 1 [, 1] X such that F (t, ) 1 (t) an F (t, 1) 2 (t). Alternatively, we can regar F as a continuous function F : [, 1] [, 1] X satisfying (2.1) F (t, ) 1 (t), F (t, 1) 2 (t) an F (, s) F (1, s). For a continuous complex function f(z) on an open set G C an a C 1 curve : [, 1] G, we efine 1 (2.2) f(z)z = (f(z)z). We nee to be piece-wise C 1 (more generally rectifiable) in orer for the integral to converge. However, we can efine the integral for continuous curves by 1 (2.3) f(z)z = lim f(z)z = lim α (f(z)z) α α α if the limit exists for α C ([, 1], G), where α is the C norm. As it turns out, when f(z) is holomorphic, f(z)z only epens on the homotopy type of. So the right han sie (RHS) of (2.3) always converges for f(z) holomorphic. Theorem 2.1 (Cauchy Integral Theorem, Homotopy Version). Let f(z) be an analytic function on an open set G C with f (z) continuous. If 1 : S 1 G an 2 : S 1 G are two homotopic close curves on G, then (2.4) f(z)z = 1 f(z)z. 2

CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM 5 Proof. Since f(z) is analytic, we have f/ z = an hence ω = (f(z)z) = (f(z)) z ( ) f f (2.5) = z + z z z z = f z z = z on G for ω = f(z)z. Let F : D 2 = [, 1] [, 1] G be a continuous function satisfying (2.1). If F is C, then by Stokes Theorem 1.2, = F (ω) = F (ω) = F (ω) D 2 D 2 D 2 (2.6) 1 1 = (F1,ω F1,1ω) + (F2,ω F2,1ω) ( 1 1 ) = f(f (, s))f (, s) f(f (1, s))f (1, s) ( 1 + f(f (t, ))F (t, ) = ω 1 ω. 2 1 ) f(f (t, 1))F (t, 1) By Stone-Weierstrass theorem 1.3, we can fin a sequence of C functions F n : S 1 [, 1] G such that (2.7) lim n F F n =. Let α 1,n (t) = F n (t, ) an α 2,n = F n (t, 1). Then (2.8) lim 1 α 1,n = lim 2 α 2,n = n n an (2.9) ω = α 1,n ω α 2,n for all n by (2.6). We claim that for every continuous close curve : S 1 G, there exists r > such that (2.1) f(z)z const for all C close curves β : S 1 G satisfying β < r. By the compactness of [, 1], we can fin r > such that (2.11) {z : z (t) < r} G β for all t [, 1]. For two C close curves β 1 an β 2 satisfying (2.12) β 1 < r an β 2 < r,

6 XI CHEN we have a C homotopy E : S 1 [, 1] G efine by (2.13) E(t, s) = sβ 1 (t) + (1 s)β 2 (t). So we have (2.14) ω = ω. β 1 β 2 Therefore, we have (2.1). Consequently, (2.15) ω = lim ω = lim ω. 1 β 1 β n α 1,n Similarly, (2.16) 2 ω = an (2.4) follows from (2.9). lim ω = lim ω β 2 β n α 2,n Corollary 2.2. Let f(z) be an analytic function on an open set D C. Then f(z)z exists for all continuous curves : [, 1] D. Proof. We have prove it for close. In case that () (1), we fin a C curve β : [, 1] D such that () = β() an (1) = β(1). We let { (2t) if t 1/2 (2.17) α = β(2 2t) if 1/2 < t 1 Then α is close an hence α f(z)z exists. Therefore, (2.18) f(z)z = f(z)z f(z)z exists. α We say that a topological space X is simply connecte if every close curve in X is homotopic to a fixe point p X. We say that two topological spaces X an Y are homotopic if there exists continuous function f : X Y an g : Y X such that g f is homotopic to 1 X an f g is homotopic to 1 Y. In other wors, f an g are homotopy inverse to each other. We say a topological space X is contractible if there is a point p X such that f : {p} X an g : X {p} are homotopy inverse to each other. Obviously, every contractible space is simply connecte. A set X R n is star-shape if there exists a point p X such that the line segment (2.19) pq = {(1 s)p + sq : s 1} X for all q X. A star-shape set X is contractible an hence simply connecte by the homotopy F : X [, 1] X (2.2) F (q, s) = (1 s)p + sq. β

CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM 7 Every convex set is star-shape an hence simply connecte. We call 3. Homology Version of Cauchy Integral Theorem (3.1) n = {(t, t 1,..., t n ) : t k = 1, t k for k n} R n+1 k= the n-simplex. The k-th face α k : n 1 n is the map (3.2) α k (t, t 1,..., t n 1 ) = (t, t 1,..., t k 1,, t k,..., t n 1 ). For a topological space X, we let C n (X) be the free abelian groups generate by continuous maps f : n X, i.e., { a } (3.3) C n (X) = m i f i : m i Z, f i C( n, X). We have a group homomorphism : C n (X) C n 1 (X) inuce by (3.4) f = ( 1) k f α k k= for all f C( n, X). One can check that (3.5) 2 =. So efines a complex on C (X) an the n-th homology group of X is (3.6) H n (X) = ker(c n(x) C n 1 (X)). Im(C n+1 (X) C n (X)) Let G be an open set in C. For an analytic function f(z) on G an C 1 (X), we efine a (3.7) f(z)z = m i f(z)z i if = m i i with i : 1 = [, 1] G continuous. Theorem 3.1 (Cauchy Integral Theorem, Homology Version). Let f(z) be an analytic function on an open set G C with f (z) continuous. If C 1 (G) satisfies = an = in H 1 (G), then (3.8) f(z)z =. Proof. Since = an = in H 1 (G), by the efinition of H 1 (G), = σ for some σ C 2 (G). It suffices to show that (3.9) f(z)z = σ for all continuous maps σ : 2 G.

8 XI CHEN Let α : [, 1] 2 be the close curve (, 3t, 1 3t) for t 1/3 (3.1) α(t) = (3t 1, 2 3t, ) for 1/3 t 2/3 (3 3t,, 3t 2) for 2/3 t 1. Clearly, (3.11) σ f(z)z = σ α f(z)z. Since 2 is contractible, α is homotopic to a point in 2. Hence σ α is homotopic to a point in G. Then by the homotopy version of CIT, we have (3.12) f(z)z = f(z)z =. σ The avantage of the homology version of CIT is that it is very easy to verify two curves are homologous by triangularization. For example, let G = C\{z 1 z 2 }. It is easy to see that σ α (3.13) 1 = 2 + 3 in H 1 (G) by Figure 1, where i are the circles (3.14) { z = R}, { z z 1 = r 1 } an { z z 2 = r 2 }, respectively, oriente counter-clockwise with r 1 +r 2 < z 1 z 2 << R. Then we can conclue (3.15) f(z)z = 1 f(z)z + 2 f(z)z 3 for all analytic functions f(z) on G. 632 Central Acaemic Builing, University of Alberta, Emonton, Alberta T6G 2G1, CANADA E-mail aress: xichen@math.ualberta.ca

CAUCHY INTEGRAL THEOREM 9 1 2 3 Figure 1. The sum of the bounaries of all triangles, oriente counterclockwise, is 1 2 3